1996-005-RES WHEREAS, ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS IN COOPERATION WITH THE TEXAS NATURAL
RESOLUTION NO. 96-005
WHEREAS, the ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS IN
COOPERATION WITH THE TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERV A TION
COMMISSION provides funding for Solid Waste grants; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris is desirous of processing
a grant application for FY 1996 Solid Waste Grant, Category 4: Other Solid
Waste Management Projects, at a total cost of $71,640.96, with $24,322.92 to be
provided by grant and $41,786.84 to be provided by the City of Paris in the form of
local matching funds and $5,531.20, monetary equivalent, in the form of in-kind
services; and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Paris did execute an application
on January 4, 1996, which execution should be in all things ratified; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PARIS:
1. That the application made to the ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS IN COOPERATION WITH THE TEXAS NATURAL
RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION for a FY 1996 Solid Waste Grant,
Category 4: Other Solid Waste Management Projects, in the amount of
$24,322.92, being approximately 44% of the estimated cost of the proposed
projects, with the City of Paris providing $41,786.84 in funds and $5,531.20,
monetary equivalent, in the form of in-kind services is hereby ratified and the form
of such application is approved.
2. That Michael E. Malone, City Manager of the City of Paris, be, and
he is hereby appointed as the Authorized Representative, of said project and the
execution of the application for grant in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A on
January 4, 1996, is hereby ratified.
3. That Thomas E. Haynes, be, and he is hereby appointed as Project
Director and is hereby authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the City of
Paris all reports, communications, assurances, and documents necessary for the
completion of said project.
4. That W. E. Anderson, Director of finance, be, and he is hereby
authorized and directed to serve as the financial Officer for said project and to
receive and distribute funds for purposes of the other solid waste management
projects.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of January, 1996.
Eric . Clifford, Mayor
ATTEST:
--
~
(\
.,
!-- ,
\
\,
The Ark-Tex Council of Governments
In Cooperation with the Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission
FY 1996 SOLID WASTE GRANT APPLICATION FORM
Category 4: Other Solid Waste Management Projects
GENERAllNFORMA TION
Name of Applicant: City of Pnri,
Total amount of grant funding requested: $ 24,322.92
Check the type of project proposed:
A. Installation of Scales at Landfills
Platform truck scales and electronic data-recording equipment
Installation expenses
B. Citizens Collection Stations
Site preparation and facility construction, including slabs, paving, awnings,
attendant shelters and sanitation facilities, fencing and lighting, and.
containment berms
Equipment, such as dumpsters or roll-off containers, and recycling
containers
Protective gear
Printing, advertising, signage, and postage
Administrative expenses, including salaries/fringe benefits and office
supplies
C. Special Clean-up and Recycling Events
Collection sacks and protective gear
Printing, advertising, signage, postage, and T-shirts/caps for volunteers
Administrative expenses, including salaries/fringe benefits, office supplies,
travel, and indirect costs
Removal of dilapidated houses and recycling the debris
x
1
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATION
., certify, as an authorized representative of the applicant, that the information
contained in this grant application is, to be the best of my knowledge and
understanding, true and accurate. ..
Sig
Michael E. Malone
Typed Name
City Manager
Title
January 4. 1996
Date
, .:' ~ I
i'r:,h : i,~:
:.'
:. .~
,.
,
!
,t
, ".
',". .
~ ( ,', " ;" ':', ;
t.
,~ "',
..I".J
.. ;:", ;d.\
fl': ':: i ';: ,'1 ~" ,,';:
"f' ,~. ;:, :; ,';\:'J
,,;':~ .,:'1; ",'j" ~ '/',.;
. (:~: ~':'Y.I :~; ,';:
'i!':.,'(1';
!:,)d'1,t:;:"'~,"1;~q' li:~t).~j
'!;:'(1rf;;',' ,,!(~rtcjl"ibr:t~;
"'..
3
L
"
I
We shall document the results of the proposed proj ect by
measuring the total number of yards that will be going to the
landfill.
We plan to demolish twenty-four (24) dilapidated houses in
the city of Paris by transporting the remains of the
dilapidated houses to a collection site and use a tub grinder
to reduce the amount that goes to the landfill by fifty-five
percent (55%).
By taking the total number of yards which we estimate to be
6,912 yards and reducing it to 3,162 yards by using the tub
grinder, we will save a net of $22,502.08 on this project.
We estimate that the removal of twenty-four (24) dilapidated
houses will benefit 3,600 citizens in northwest Paris.
EVALUATION OF CONSISTENCY WITH
REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The proposed project must be consistent with the regional solid waste
managemen! (J'an approved by TNRCC in order to receive grant funding. In the space
bel?w, specifically state each goal, objective, or other component of the regional plan
which supports the proposed project. Please attach additional pages if needed.
",'1 '
Goal Number 1 utilize grant funds for local plans to-
reduce solid waste in landfills.
Goal Number 3A -Develop integrated solutions to the
collection of dilapidated housing waste.
Goal Number 3B -pursue a market for sawdust from the tub i"
grinder that can be used as fuel.
Goal Number 5 Discourage illegal dumping by
dilapidated houses and end up with clean lot. Also
collecting area for processing demolished houses
grinder.
removing
provide
in tub
,
Goal Number 6 - Develop integrated solutions to regulate
construction/demolition waste.
.I
'.;;
5
C. PROJECT COST EVALUATION (0-20 Points)
In the space below, provide an evaluation of the costs associated with the
proposed project, based on specific questions listed in the scoring criteria.
Please attach additional pages if needed. .
"
"
ii'
;, .....,:~~,(..<I ,.~:-,.,:..<lj~
Listed below is the proposed total cost of the project.
We estimate that each house will require twenty-four (24)
loads per house for twenty-four (24) houses or 576 total
loads in a twelve (12) yard truck.
576 loads x 12 yard truck = 6,912 total yards
Of the 6,912 yards, we estimate 1,912 yards
straight to landfill because it is not suited
because of metal, concrete, asphalt, shingles,
or 27% will go
for tub grinder
etc.
This leaves us with 5,000 yards to grind.
,;,
5,000 yds. to grind in 20 hrs. at 250.00 per hr.- $5,000.00
After tub grinder we will have 1,250 yds. left
that goes to landfill at $7.82 per yd. - $9,775.00
Trucking the 1,250 yds. of sawdust will cost
$17.50 per load or 104 loads - $1,822.92
The 1,912 yards that went straight to landfill
cost $60.00 per load or 159 loads - $9,560.00
The 1,912 yards cost $7.82 per yard to go to
landfill -$14,'951.84
Taking the 5,000 yards from 24 housing sites
to collection area (12 yards per load @ $60.00
per load)
-$25,000.00
Total Cost
$66,109.76
If all 6,912 yds. had gone 6,911 x 7.82 $54,051.84
straight to landfill and no 576 loads @ $60=34,560.00
tub grinc!-ing it would cost-nnn------------------- $88,611. 84
$22,502.08
So Savings Is
9
GRANT BUDGET SUMMARY
Please provide the following breakdown of the total amount of grant funding being
requested:
BUDGET CATEGORY GRANT FUNDING .
1. Personnel/salaries $
2. Fringe benefits $
3. Travel $
4. Supplies $
5. Equipment $ 24,322.92
6. Construction $
7. Contractual (other than for construction) $
8. Other $
I"." Total direct charges (sum of 1-8) $ 24,322.92
9. Indirect charges * $
"Total grant funding requested (sum of 1- $ 24,322.92
9)
,
,)1
If applicable, please provide the following information:
. What is your fringe benefit rate:
%
. What is your indirect charge rate:
%
. Identify the budget categories to which your indirect rate is applied:
. Any indirect charges must be in accordance with an approved cost allocation plan, or in
accordance with the Indirect Cost Computaton Table contained in the current UGCMS, which is
available from your COG. If you have an approved cost allocation plan, please enclose
documentation of your approved indirect rate.
Please be sure to complete any of the following detailed budget sheets which
are applicable (please pull out those sheets which are not applicable).
11
PROJECT SUMMARY
Complete the following project summary to the best of your ability. Please note
that the project summary is based on the scoring criteria stated in the request for
proposals. Please refer to the specific questions listed in the scoring criteria when
completing the project summary. Please be detailed, but provide clear and concise
information. The project summary consists of four sections, A through 0, each with
'a maximum value of 25 points.
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (0.20 Points)
In the space below, provide a description of the proposed project, based on
specific Questions listed in the scoring criteria. Please attach additional
pages if needed.
The proposed project
dilapidated houses and
a tub grinder..
is needed to remove and demolish
reduce this demolition waste by using
Our goal is to remove and demolish twenty-four (24) houses.in
Paris using a collection center and tub grinder.
This project will benefit the citizens of Paris in many ways
such as remove blight from the neighborhood, reduce crime,_
improve safety, make a healthy environment, discourage
illegal dumping, and improve the property value of the
neighborhood.
We anticipate 3,600
of the twenty-four
section of Paris.
citizens who will benefit by the removal
(24) dilapidated houses in the northwest
"
In 1995, we experimented and removed twenty-two (22) houses
in northeast Paris by moving the dilapidated houses to a
collection site and renting a tub grinder to reduce the waste
by fifty-five percent (55%).
We expect a savings of $22,502.08 in the proposed twenty-four
(24) houses to be demolished by using the tub grinder to
reduce waste by fifty-five percent (55%) before putting into
the landfill.
7
I
3
.'
,
J'
,
i
I
!
"
il"
I
,
I
I
L:..
Ii
i'
!
"
;:':
What is the TOTAL COST of the proposed project, considering
the total grant funding requested, any matching funds being
provided by the applicant, and the monetary equivalent of any in-
kind services being provided by the applicant:
$ 71.640.96
','
,:
!",
, "'1,'
f'
" ",;....".i..':\...
".,:.,,,:,-,
..!"j"
'I
ii'
;1
Ii
;;;~..!, '. ". ,.:.
13
. .
"
,',' ,,'1'\"
'.,
',~ p. .1:,11
.'il;
'" "J\\ ,', "
;i~ nun '~.\\~\ L.
'>J} \..\.;,\:.~\~;,~:\' \'
.' .~'. ,~,,'.',_ ",,.. """_'''_' 0'" ".'"
!
: :"":'1'" i~:u',~,:1!
"......-"J,
;{l'(J:i"'r0'd'~
j
i
I
'.-' ...,.."" '.'1
,.' ". "~'" '. :.i::~::!,~,:' ,E~:t
,
':~I:::1'.'(';tqnl"';I'
.'...~."-.,."""'....",...........,,
~ t:' ,j i :f:"\ 1\1 ~:':i
..
,
!
.. 1
.~ r. t f: :'j f\':': 1
I
-" ,.-~..., ~"'~"-'-"~'-'" ~ ..-,
. '''I 'J' 'r,itl'T,;J I
",..........::.,,:_...,;~1
:flQ:l'.,;l'iij-""\:
i
.
,
I
...,..,,- --'J
. ~::!~j~.t~!:
-,.......,.....-.".""",
. ,
DETAilED BUDGET SHEET 4: Grant-Funded Supplies
, ;',"!(:
This budget sheet should be completed if any expenses are entered for supplies on.
Line 4 of your Grant Budget Summary.
Supplies are consumable items that generally have a useful life of less than one year,
and have a IlDiJ. cost of less than $1,000. (Expenses for food and beverages are not
allowable. Further, any items which are not routinely used in conducting normal
business over the year should be listed under the "other" budget category,)
In the space' below, please list the general types of supplies you intend to purchase
with grant funding:
"(.".1"
.i; I,"j'
,
17