1993-126-RES WHEREAS, the Water shed Plan Agreement Watershed became effective on the 6th day and, for Pine of
RESOLUTION NO.
93-126
WHEREAS, the Water shed Plan Agreement
Watershed became effective on the 6th day
and,
for Pine
of March,
Creek
1964;
WHEREAS, the Supplemental Watershed Agreement No. I
became effective on the 11th day of August, 1971; and,
WHEREAS, the Supplemental Watershed Agreement No. II
became effective on the 9th day of July, 1984; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris
receipt of Supplemental Watershed Agreement No. Ill,
form attached hereto as Exhibit A, which affects Lake
a City of Paris water supply source; and,
is in
in the
Crook,
WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interest
City of Paris that Lake Crook be maintained in such a
as to continue to serve the City of Paris as a part
water system; NOW, THEREFORE,
of the
manner
of its
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS,
that Supplemental Watershed Plan Agreement No. III for Pine
Creek Watershed, Lamar County, Texas is hereby approved
subject to Lake Crook being maintained by the City of Paris
as a part of its water system so long as the same shall be
needed; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor Pro Tem of the
City of Pairs, Don Shelton, be, and he is hereby authorized
and directed to execute on behalf of the City of Paris said
Supplemental Watershed Agreement No. III in the form of
Exhibit A attached hereto.
Passed and adopted this 13th day of December, 1993.
ATTEST:
B~~;;1~y,~~t City Clerk
2~~
..... T7' "IT______ r"..:+-.... ^...................,.,O'l7-
,-
/
SUPPLEMENTAL WATERSHED AGREEMENT NO. III
FOR PINE CREEK WATERSHED, TEXAS
by
EXCHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE
Since the original Waters~ed Agreement became effective on the 6th
day of March, 1964, and subsequent supplements since, it has become
necessary to modify that agreement in order to facilitate the
completion of the plan.
Grade Stabilization Structures (GSS)-IOI and 104 are no longer
applicable to existing conditions. Erosion has been effectively
reduced at the locations of these two planned structure sites.
Studies indicate that the expected benefits from the two structures
would not accrue. Therefore, GSS-10l and 104 are hereby deleted from
the watershed plan.
Paragraph 3 of the watershed agreement is changed to read:
Works of
ImDrovement
Sponsoring
Local
Orcranization
(percent)
SCS
(percent)
Estimated
Construction
Cost
(dollarsl
Lake Crook
Modification 0 100 170,100
Basic Fish and
Wildlife Facilities 50 50 75,300
15 Floodwater Retarding
Structures 0 100 1,763,500
7.06 miles of Channel
Work 0 100 567,800
4 Grade Stabilization
Structures 0 100 359,300
EXHIBIT A
"
Paragraph 4 of the watershed agreement is changed to read:
Sponsoring Estimated
Works of Local Engineering
ImDrovement Orcranization SCS Service Cost
(percent) (percent) (dollarsl
Lake Crook
Modification 0 100 20,300
Basic Fish and
Wildlife Facilities 100 0 8,200
15 Floodwater Retarding
Structures 0 100 329,200
7.06 miles of Channel
Work 0 100 60,500
4 Grade Stabilization
Structures 0 100 48,200
All other terms, conditions, and stipulations of the watershed
agreement not modified here remain the same and are agreed to:
Signed:
President
c{ff:ffl17~/
Don Shelton, Mayor Pro Tem
State Conservationist
Conservationist
Lamar Count v WCID No.3
Sponsor
Date
Lamar Soil and Water
Conservation District
Sponsor
Date
Lamar Co. Commissioners
Court
Sponsor
/'1./ t. /9}
Date .
Citv of Paris
Sponsor
Date
Soil Conservation Service
USDA: SCS
Date