1989-038-RES WHEREAS, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION HAS FUNDING AVAILABLE FOR ASSISTANCE FOR UPDATING AIRPORT
RESOLUTION NO. 89-038
WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration has available
funding for assistance for updating airport master plans; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris deems it to
be in the best interest of the citizens of Paris to seek such
assistance in order to update the master plan for Cox Field,
utilizing the Federal Aviation Administration funds available for
such purpose; and,
WHEREAS, the form of application for such grant assistance
in the amount of approximately $40,500.00, which will require
matching City of Paris funds in the amount of approximately
$4,500.00, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which should in all
things be approved; and,
WHEREAS, Bucher, Willis & Ratliff, Consulting Engineers,
Planners and Architects, have made a proposal for development of
an Airport Master Plan, in the form of a contract for
professional services, attached hereto as Exhibit B, which should
in all things be approved; and,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS:
1. That the form of application, attached hereto as
Exhibit A, for a grant in the amount of $40,500.00 requiring a
local match of $4,500.00 for the updating of the airport master
plan for Cox Field is in all things approved.
2. That Eric S. Clifford, Mayor of the City of Paris, be,
and he is hereby appointed as the Authorized Official of said
project and is authorized and directed to execute on behalf of
the City of Paris the application for grant in the form attached
hereto as Exhibit A.
3. That Michael E. Malone, City Manager of the City of
Paris, be, and he is hereby appointed as the Certifying
Representative of said project and is authorized and directed to
execute on behalf of the City of Paris, FAA Form 424 included in
the City of Paris' Application for Grant, attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
4. That Earl Smith, City Engineer of the City of Paris, be
and he is hereby appointed as Proj ect Director and is hereby
authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the City of Paris
all reports, communications, assurances and documents necessary
for the completion of said project.
5. That W. E. Anderson, Director of Finance, be, and he is
hereby authorized and directed to serve as the Financial Officer
for said project and to receive and distribute funds in
accordance with the grant agreement or award as appropriate; and,
HI<' T'I' FTlR'I'HRR RESOLVED. That the form of contract for
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF LAMAR
I, Mattie Cunningham, hereby certify that I am the duly
appointed, qualified and acting city Clerk of the City of Paris,
Pari s, Texas, and as such I have in my possess i on in the Cffi ce of
Ci ty Cl erk of the City of Pari s, a 11 of the Ordi nances, Reso 1 uti ons,
and Minutes of the City Council of the City of Paris, and that the
foregoi ng Reso 1 uti on No. 89-038 is a true and correct copy of the
original of said instrument, which was passed by the City Council on
the 10th day of April, 1989.
~~"~:::~~~~J
MATTIE CUNNINGHAM, CITY CL RK
City of Paris, Paris, Texas
AGREEMENT FOR PLANNING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made this
Hundred and Eighty-Nine.
day of
in the year Nineteen
BY AND BETWEEN Paris, Texas, hereinafter called the City; and
Willis & Ratliff, Consulting Engineers, Planners and Architects of
Texas hereinafter called the Consultant.
Bucher,
Tyler,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Consultant, for the considerations
hereinafter set forth, agree as follows:
The City recognizes
Airport. The Consultant
required to complete the
a need to prepare a Master plan for the
has been selected and agrees to perform the
Plan as per the following Articles:
Municipal
services
ARTICLE I
. PROJECT SCOPE OF SERVICES
The project services will be done in accordance with the "Scope of
Services" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
ARTICLE II
TIME SCHEDULE
The performance of this Agreement is contingent and valid only on the
receipt by the City of Paris of a grant from the Federal Aviation
Administration to prepare the. Airport Master Plan. After receipt and
acceptance of the grant offer, the Consultant agrees to proceed with the
project immediately upon execution by both parties of this Agreement and
receipt of a Notice to Proceed from the City, and to assign such personnel as
required to complete the scope of services within twelve (12) months after the
Notice to Proceed, exclusive of City and F.A.A. review.
ARTICLE III
COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT'
The City agrees to
for the services stated
($45,000) .
pay the Consultant in monthly payments in compensation
above, the lump sum of Forty-five Thousand Dollars
Payment shall be made to
days after receipt of monthly
tion of each portion of work.
the Consultant by the City within thirty (30)
billings from the Consultant following comple-
EXHIBIT fJ
ARTICLE IV
STANDARD DOT TITLE VI ASSURANCE
During the performance of this Contract, the Consultant for itself, its
assignees and successors in the interest agree as follows:
1. Compliance with Requlations: The Consultant shall comply with the
regulations relative to nondiscrimination in Federally-assisted
programs of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended
from time to time, (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations),
which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this
Contract.
2. Nondiscrimination: The Consultant, with regard to the work per-
formed by it during the Contract, shall not discriminate on the
grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection or
retention of subcontractors, including procurements or materials and
leases of equipment. The Consultant shall not participate either
directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Sec-
tion 21.5 of the regulations. The Consultant shall abide by the
City's Affirmative Action Plan and the Texas statutory requirements
in regard to discrimination. '.
3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Includinq Procurements of Materials
and Equipment: In all solicitations either by competitive bidding
or negotiation made by the Consultant for work to be performed under
a subcontract including procurements of materials or leases of
equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be noti-
fied by the Consultant of the Consultant's obligations under this
Contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the
grounds of race, color, or national origin.
4. Information and Reports: The Consultant shall provide all informa-
tion and reports required by the Regulations or directives issued
pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records,
accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be
determined by the City or the Federal Aviation Administration to be
pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders and
instructions. Where any information required of a Consultant is in
the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish
this information, the Consultant shall so certify to the City or the
Federal Aviation Administration as appropriate, and shall set forth
what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the Consultant's non-
compliance with the nondiscrimination provlslons of this Contract,
the City shall impose such Contract sanctions as it or the Federal
Aviation Administration may determine to be appropriate, including,
but not limited to:
a. Withholding of payment to the Consultant under the Contract
until the Consultant complies, and/or
b. Cancellation, termination or suspension of the Contract, in
whole or in part.
6. Incorporation of Provisions: The Consultant shall include the pro-
visions.of paragraphs 1 through 6 in every subcontract, including
procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempted by
the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto. The Con-
sultant shall take such action, with respect to any subcontract or
procurement, as the City or the Federal Aviation Administration may
direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions
for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event a Consultant
becomes involved in or is threatened with litigation with a
subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the
Consultant may request the United States to enter into such litiga-
tion to protect the interest of the United States.
ARTICLE V
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
1. Chanqe in Scope: The. scope of services described herein shall be
subject to modification - or supplement only upon the written
agreement of the contracting parties and the F.A.A. Any such
modification in the scope of the work shall be incorporated in this
Agreement by supplemental agreement.
2. Termination: The right is reserved by the City to terminate this
Agreement upon the completion of any of the phases included in the
work, or at any time, should the City deem that further work is not
warranted. In such an event, written notice shall be given to the
Consultant, and payment shall be made for the completed Contract
services. The City further reserves the right to terminate the
Contract any time, upon written notice, in the event the services of
the Contractor are unsatisfactory, or upon failure to prosecute the
services with due diligence or to complete the services within the
time limits specified by this Agreement or should the City deem that
the project must be curtailed for other causes; provided, however,
that in any such case, the Contractor shall be paid for the services
rendered up to the time of termination.
3. Arbitration: Arbitration of all questions in dispute under this
Agreement shall be at the choice of either party, and the dispute
will finally and conclusively be settled by the decision of the
arbitrators, one to be appointed by the City, one by the Contractor,
and a third to be chosen by the two appointed. In case these three
arbitrators thus chosen fail to agree, two additional arbitrators
shall be appointed by the presiding judge of the United States Court
of Appeals having jurisdiction over the region which includes
Paris, Texas. The majority decision of these arbitrators shall be
binding upon both parties. Arbitrators shall be men capable by
training and experience to understand and pass upon the problems to
be considered. No one shall serve as arbitrator who has or has had
any financial or pecuniary interest with any of the parties. No
arbitrator shall be an advocate for either of the parties.
4.
Bindincr Upon Successors: This Agreement shall be binding upon
undersigned parties, their successors, partners, assigns, and
representatives.
the
legal
5. Ownership of Documents: All original drawings shall be submitted to
and become property of the City.
6.
Disclaimer Statement: The Consultant agrees that all final
lished documents and reports shall contain on the inside front
the required disclaimer statement as applicable at the time of
preparation.
pub-
cover
their
7.
Quarterlv Procrress Reports: Quarterly
submitted to the City and 'the F.A.A. by
(5) days following the beginning of each
progress reports will be
the Consultant within five
quarter.
8. Procurement Standards: The Consultant understands and agrees that
the type of instruments used, (i.e., fixed price contracts, cost
reimbursable contracts, purchase orders, incentive contractors,
etc.), shall be appropri?te:for the particular procurement and for
promoting the best interest of the Airport Master Plan Study under
the Airport Improvement' Program (A.I.P.). Furthermore, the
Consultant certifies that the "cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost"
method of contra6ting shall not be used. Standards identified in
Attachment 0 of OMB Circular A-102 will be utilized as attached and
incorporated herein.,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, the
day and year first above-written.
ATTEST:
, CITY OF PARIS
By:
Eric S., Clifford~ Mayor
City Clerk
BUCHER, WILLIS & RATLIFF
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & ARCHITECTS
By:
Jaroes Ray Flemons Pa~tner
o:.~g crrH:U:"AR no. A..~C2
ATiAC~""DT 0 - RE'![~o:
. .
, .
PRCCL:RUPIT STAr:r~RDS
1. Aoel icabil itv.
A. This Attac~~ent establishes standards and guidelines for the proc"re-
ment of supplies, equipment, construction, and services for Federal
assistance programs. These standards are furnished to ensure that
such materials and services are obtained efficiently and econc~ically
and in ccmpl iance with the provisions of appl icable Federal lalv and
Executive orders.
8. No addi t i anal procurenent requi rements or subordi nate regul at ions
shall be imposed upon Grantees by Executive agencies unless specific-
al 1y required by Federal law or Executive orders or authorized by the
Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy. This prohibition is
not appl i cab 1 e to payme'nt cond it ions issued in accordance wi th
Treasury Circular, 1075, ind1vidual Grantee requirements pursuant to
Section 10 of the basic circular, or the provisions of this or other
01,18 ci rcu 1 a rs .
C. ,Provisions of current subordinate requirements not confonning to this
Attachment shall be rescinded by Grantor Agencies unless approved by
the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP).
2. Grantee/Granter ResoonSibility.
A. These standards do not relieve the Grantee of any contractual res pon-
sibil ities under its contracts. The Grantee is responsible, in
accordance with good administrative practice and sound business judg-
ment, for the settlement of all contractual and administrative issues
arising out of procurements entered into in support of a grant.
These include, but are not limited to: source evaluation, protests,
disputes, and claims. Executive agencies shall not substitute their
jud~:::ent for that of the Grantee unless the matter is primarily a
Federal concern. Viol'ations of law are to be referred to the local,
State, or Federal authority having proper jurisdiction.
8. Grantees shall use their own procurement procedures which reflect ap-
plicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that procure-
ments for Federal Assistance Programs conform to the standards set
forth in this Attachment and applicable Federal law.
3. Grantee Procurement Imorovement.
Executive a~encies a~/arding Federal grants or other assistance which re-
quire or allow for procurement by the recipients are enccura~ed to assist
recipients in improving their procurament capabilities by providing them with
technical assistance, training, publicaticns, and other aid.
4. P"',:,,:'::,,,:-,::"-: :</'3::i :;lQ'/i~"/S.
A. Exec~~ive agencies are ,encouraged to perform re'/ie':,s of their gra~:-
ees' prcc~rement systems if a ccntinuing relationshi~ with tee
Grantee is anticipated or a substantial amount of the Federal assis:-
ance is to be used for procurement and review of individual Contracts
is antici~ated. The purpose of the review shall be to determire:
(I) whether a Grantee's procurement syste~ mee~s the standards pre-
scribed by this At~achment or other criteria acceptable to the OF?? ,
such as provisions of the model procurement code for State and local
goverrment and (2) whether the Grantee's procurement system should be
cercified by the re'/iewing agency. Such a revie'lI will also give an
agency an opportunity to give technical assistance to a Grantee to
remedy its procurement system if it does not fully comply. In addi-
tion, such a review may provide a basis for deciding whether the
Grantee's contracts and related procurement documents should be
subject to the Grantor's prior approval, as provided by Section 6.
B. In conducting procurement system reviews, Grantor Agencies will eval-
uate a Grantee's procure~ent system in terms of whether it camplies
I~ith the standards prescribed by this Attachment and represents a
fair, efficient and effective procurement system. To the minimum
extent feasible, revie':lers' will rely upon State or local evaluations
and analyses performed by agencies or organizations independent of
the Grantee contracting activity.
C. ,,'hen a Federal Grantor Agency campI etes a procurement review, 1t
shall furnish a report to the Grantee, with a copy to OF?P.
D. All agencies should normally rely upon the resultant findings or cer-
tification for a periOd of 24 months before another review is
perfomed.
E. Re'/ie'tls shall be conducted in accordance with standards and guide-
lines approved or issued by OFPP.
F. The revie~'ls authorized by Section 6 are waived if a Grantee's pro-
cure~ent system is certified. '
5. Protest P,~cedures.
Grantor agencies may develop an administrative procedure to handle cc~-
plaints or protests regarding Grantee contractor selection actions. The
procedure shall be limited as follows:
A. No protest shall be accepted by the Grantor Agency until all adr.lin-
istrative remedies at the Grantee level have been exhausted.
O. Reviel'/ is limited to:
1. Violations of Federal law or regulations. Violations of State or
local la\'1 shall be under the juriSdiction of State or local auth-
orities.
2. Violations of Grantee's protcst proccdurcs or failurc to rcview a
ccr.1plaint or protest.
6. Gr~~:cr ~evje~i of Prc~cse~ ron~~!C:5.
Federal Grantor pre-al'lard revie'd and apprO'la! of the Gnntee's prooose-:
contracts and related procurement dccu",ents, suc~ as recuescs fer proposals
and invitations 'for bids, is per.:1itted only under the follo',ling c;rc~Cl-
stances:
A. The procurement is expected to exceed 510,000 and is to be awar~ed
without cQ;1eetition or only one bid or offer is received in response
to sol icitation;
B. The procurement expected to exceed 510,000 specifies a "brand name"
product; or
C. The Grantee's procurement procedures or operation fails to CQ;101y
with one or more significant aspects of this Attachment. The Grantor
Agency shall notify the Grantee in writing, with a copy of such
notification to the OFPP.
7. Code of Ccnduct.
Grantees shall maintain a f1ritten code or standards of conduct which
shall govern the performance of their officers, emplcyees or agents engaged
in the award and administration of contracts supported by Federal Junds. No
employee, officer or agent of the Grantee shall participate in selection, or
in theal~ard or administration of a contract supported by Federal funds if a
conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. Such a conflict
would arise when:
A. the employee, officer or agent;
B. any member of his immediate family;
C. his or her partner; or
D. an organization I',hich employs, or is about to employ, any of the
above, has a financial or other interest in the finn selected for
a~la rd.
The Grantee's officers, employees or agents shall neither solicit nor ac-
cept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value fran contractors,
potential contractors, Or parties to subagreements.
Grantees may set minimum rules where the financial interest is not sub-
stantial Or the gift is an unsolicited item of intrinsic value.
To the extent pe~itte-j by State or 1001 1 a 1'1 or re']ulations, such stan-
dards of conduct shall provide for penalties, sanctions, or other disciplin-
ary actions for violations of such standards by the Grantee's officers,
employees, or agents, or by contractors or their agents.
a. Pr~cure~ent Procedur~s.
The Grantee shall establ ish prCc~rcment procedures which pr,,'lide tr.~:
proposed prccuremenc actions shall be reviewed by Grantee officials to,avoid
the ;::.:r~h~S2 cr :':r1;:ecess~r/ or dU;Jlicati'/e items. Ccnsideration shculd :c
given to ccnsol idJtion or breaking out to obtain a more economical purchas~.
,ihere appropriate, an analysis 'shall be made of lease-versus-purc~ase al tu-
natives, and any other appropriate analysis to dete~~ine which approach would
be the most econanica1. To foster greater eccnany and efficiency, Gran:e~s
are encouraged to enter into State and local Intergoverr.m~ntJI agreements ~or
procurement or use of common goods and serlices.
9. Contr~ctiro I,lith Small and ;~inority F'i,.",s. Hemen's Eusiress Er.te~~r'se
ana Laocr Sunclus Area Fi~s.
A. It is national policy to award a fair share of contracts to small and
minority business finns. Accordingly, affinndClve steps must be,
taken to assure that sma II and mi nori ty busi nesses are ut i 1 i zed \'I~en
possible as sources of suppl ies, equipment, construction and ser-
vices. Affinnative steps shall include the following:
1. Including qualified small and minority businesses in solicitation
lists.
2. Assuring that small, and minority businesses are solicited when-
ever they are potent i a I sources.
3. ,;hen eccnCfi1ically feasible, dividing total requirements into
smaller tasks or quantities sa as to pennit maximum small and
minority business participa~ion.
4. ~.'here the requirement pennits, establ ishing del ivery schedules
I.hich will encourage participation by small and minority busi-
ness.
5. Using the services and assistance of the Small Business Adminis-
tration, the Office of Minority Business Enterprise of the
Department of Commerce and the Community S~rvices Administration
as requi red;'
6. If any subcontracts are to be let; requiring the prime contractor
to take the affinnative steps in 1 through 5 above.
B. Grantees shall take similar appropriate affinnative action in support
of women's business enterprises (WEE).
C. Grantees are encouraged to procure goods and services from labor sur-
plus areas.
D. Grantor agencies may impose additional regulations and recuiremen:s
in the foregcing areas only to the extent speCifically mandated by
statute or presidential direction.
10. Selection Prrcedures.
A. All prOCUne~ent transactions, regardless of whether by sealed bids or
by ne~otiation and without regard to dollar value, shall je conducted
In a manner that provides maximum open and free ccmpetition con~is:.
ent vii th this Attachment. Procurec:cnt prccedures shall not restr1ct
or elir:1inJte concetiticn. Exar.:ples of what is considered to c:e
restrictive of ccmcetition include, but are not 1 irnited to: (I;
~lacing unreasonable require:".ents on fi~s in or=er for them :0
qUJlify to do business, (2) nonconoetiti'le practices bet"/een fir"1s.
(3) organizational conf1 icts of interest, and (4) unnecessary ex-
perience and bonding requirements.
e. The Grantee shall have ~Iritten selection procedures which shall
provide, as a minimum, the following procedural requirements:
1. Solicitations of offers, l'lhether by ccmpetitive sealed bids or
c~cetitive negotiation,shalJ:
a. Incorporate i clear and accurate description of the technical
requirements for the material, prc::uct, or service to be
prccured. Such description shall not, in ccr.1pe:itive pro.
curements, contain features which unduly restrict caneeti-
tion. The description may include a statement of the
qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be
procured and, when neces sa ry, sha 11 set forth those mi nir.1ur.1
essential chancteristics and standards to \1hich it must con-
for.:! if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product
s~ecifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it
is impractical or uneconcrr.ical to make a clear and accurate
description of the technical requirements, a "brand name or
equa l" descri pt i on may, be used as a means to defi ne the
perf o r.:1a nce or other salient requirements of a procurement.
The specific featur~s of the named brand which must be met by
offerors shall be clearly stated.
b. Clearly set forth all requirements which offerors must ful-
fill and ~Il other factors to be used in evaluating bids or
proposal s.
2. Awards shall be made only to responsible contractors that possess
the potential ability to perform successfully under the terms and
conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration shall be
given to such matters as contractor integrity, conpl iance with
public policy, record of past performance, and financial and
technical resources.
11. ~ethcd of P~~cure~ent.
Procurement under grants shall be made by one of the foIl OI.i ng methods,
as described herein: (a) small purchase procedures; (b) conpetitive sealed
bids (formal advertising); (c) canpetitive negotiation; (d) noncanpetiti'Je
negotiation.
A. Smell purchase procedures are those relatively simple and infor"':1al
procurel"ent methods that arc sound and aPcroeri ate for a procure!"en:
of se~lices, supplies or other preperty, ccsting in the a99regate not
mere than 510,000. Grantees shall cernpty I.lith State or local sr.1all
purchase dollar limits unccr 510,COO. [f sr.1all purchase proced~r=s
are used for a procur~!"ent undJr a grJnt, price or race quouti:ns
shall be obtained fro" an adcQuatenur.1ccr cf q~al ified sourc~s.
8. In c:Jc:e:~:j'/e sealed bids (fo","d] dd'/er':isir.,), sealed bid~ ar,
pu~licly solicited and a firm-fixed-price con~rJct (lu~o sum or unl':
price) is al'/arded to the responsible bidder '..,hose bid, confOr::1i,"'l
"ith all the material tems and conditions of the invitation for
bids, is 10,~les:: in price.
1. In order for formal advertising to be fea$ibl~, apprc~riate con-
ditions must be present including, as a mini~um, the follo~ing:
a. A c~plete, adequate and realistic specification or purchase
description is available.
b. Two or more responsible suppliers are willing and able to
c~pete effectively for the Grantee's business.
c. The procurement lends itself to a finn-fixed-price contract,
and selection of the successful bidder can appropriately be
made principally on the basis of price.
2. If fomal advertising is used for a procurement under a grant,
the following requirements shall apply:
a. A sufficj~nt time prior to the date set for opening of bids,
bids Shall be solicited frem an adequate number of ~nown sup-
pliers. In addition, the invitation shall be publicly adver-
tised.
b. The invitation for bids, including specifications and pertin-
ent attachments, shall clearly define the items or services
needed in order for the bidders to properl y res pond to the
invitation.
c. All bids shall be opened publicly at the time and place
stated in the invitation for bids.
d. A firm-fixed-price contract a\~ard shall be made by written
notice to that responsible bidder whose bid, conforming to
the invitation for bids, is 100~est. Where specified in the
bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation
costs and life-cycle costs shall be considered in determining
~Ihich bid is lowest. Payment discounts may only be used to
determine low bid when prior experiences of the Grantee indi-
cate that such discounts are generally taken.
e. Any or all bids may be rejected I'/hen there are sound docu-
mented business reasons in the best interest of the program.
C. In ccmpetitive negotiation, proposals are req!.:ested from a number of
sources and the Request for Proposal is publicizea, negotiations are
nOr::1ally conducted with more than one of the sources submitting of-
fers, and either a fixed-price or cost-reimbursable ty~e contr~ct ;s
a~/araed, as apprtlpriate. Canoetitive ne<Jotiation may be used if con-
ditions are not appropriate for the use of for:~al ad'iertising. If
ceree,:i: he negotiation is used for a procur~!Cer.t under a grant, the
follol'ling requirer.lencs shall apply:
t. Pr:::s.lls shall be solicited fro~ an adecuate number of qualif:e'1
sources to permit reasonable canpetition consistent I<ith t~e
nature and requirements of the prccuremen:. The Recuest for Prc-
posals shall be publicized and reasonable requests by other
sources to canpete shall be honored to the ma^lmum extent
practiCJble.
2. The request for proposal shall identify all significant evalua-
tion factors, including price or cost where required and their
relative importance.
3. The Grantee shall provide mechanisms for technical evaluation of
the proposals received, determinations of responSible offerors
for the purpose of written or oral discussions, and selection for
contract a~lard.
4. Award may be made to the ,responsible offeror whose proposal will
be most advantageous to the procuring party, price and other
factors cons idered. Unsuccessful offerors shoul d be notifi ed
pr071ptly.
5. Grantees may utilizecanpetiti'le negotiation prccedures for
procurement of Archite'.:tural/Engineering professional services,
Vihereby cO:1petitors' qualifications ar2 evaluated and the most
qualified canpetitor is selected, subject to negotiation of fair
and reasonable compensation.,
D. NoncQ:lpetitive negotiation is procurement through solicitation of a
proposal fran only one source. or after solicitation of a number of
sources, cO:1petition is determined inadequate. Noncc:npetitive nego-
tiation may be used ...hen the award of a centract is infeasible under
small purchase, canpetitive bidding (formal advertising) or competi-
tive negotiation proc2dures. Circumstances under ~fhich a contract
may be al'/arded by noncanpetitive negotiation are I imited to the
follol'ling:
1. the item is available only fran a single source;
2. public exigency or emergency Vihen the urgency for the requirement
~lil1 not permit a delay incident to competitive solicitation;
3. the Federal Grantor Agency authorizes noncanpetitive ne~otiation;
or
4. after solicitation of a number of sources, canpetition is deter-
mined inadequate.
E. Additional innovative procurement methods may be used by Grantees
with the approva I of the Grantor Agency. A ccpy of such approva I
sha 11 be sent to OFPP.
12. Contr!:t' Pr'cinn.
The cost plus a percenU~e of CaS: and percent.!<]e of ccns:r';ctien ccs:
r:le':hod of ccntracting shall not be use'J. Grantees shall perfor.:1 scone for.:1 of
ccs: cr ~rice crJljsis in ccnnec:icn ',lith ever'J prccurerner: ac:icn includ:c'J
contrcc: modl fiCJ,ions. Ccsts or prices based on est ir:lJted ces:s for COc-
trac:s unedr grants shall be al1c\'/e~ onl'J to the extent thac costs incurre-:
or cost estimates included in negotiated prices are consistent '"ith Feder~l
cost prinCiples. ,,'
13. Grentee Procurement Pecords.
Grantees shall maintain records sufficient to detail the si~r.ificant his-
tery of a prccure!Cent. These records shall include, but are not necessarily
lir;1ited to, info~ation pertinent to the following: raticnale for the methcd
of procure::-ent, selectien of contract type, contractor selection or rejec-
ticn, and the basis for the cost or price.
14. Centract Provisions.
In addition to proviSions defining a sound and complete procurement con-
tract, any recipient of Federal grant funds shall include the following con-
tract provisions or conditions in all procurement contracts and subcontracts
as re~~ired by the provision, Fed~ral law or the Grantor Agency.
A. Contracts other than small purchases shall contain provisions or con-
ditions I"hich l'Iill allcl'l for administrative, contractual, or legal
re::-edi es in instances l'Ihere contractcrs vi 01 ate or breach contract
te~s, and provide for such sanctions and penalties as may be appro-
priate.
8. All contracts in excess of S10,000 shall contain suitable proviSions
for termination by the Grantee including the manner by which it will
be effected and the basis fer settlement. In addtiion, such con-
tracts shall describe conditions under l'Ihich the contract may be ter-
minated for default as well as conditions where the centract may be
temi nated because of ci rcumstances beyond the control of the con-
tractor.
C. All contracts awarded in excess of SlO,OOO by Grantees and their
contractors or subgrantees shall contain a provision requiring com-
pliance with Executive Order 11246, entitled "Equal Employment Oppor-
tunity", as amended by Executive Order 11375, and as supplemented in
Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR Part 60).
D. All contracts and subgrants far construction or repair shall include
a pro'/ision for compliance with tr.e Cepeland "Anti-Kic~back" Act (13
use 874) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR,
Part 3). This Act prevides that each contractor or subgrJntee shall
be prohibited frem inducing, by any means, any person employed in the
construction, cCT.loletlon, or repair of pUblic l'/ork, to give up any
part of the cCT.lpensation to which he is othenlise entl tled. The
Grantee shall report all suspected or reported violations to the
Gr.:ntor Agency.
E. !-Iher. required by the Federal grant pregrJm legislation, all construe-
ticr. centrac:s in e.~cess of 52,000 al"arded by Gran':ees and suc~rc::t-
~shall Include a pro'lisicn for ec.':Ipliance with the Da'lis.2"c~:1
Ac: ~~0 ~:: 275d ~o d-7) dS suoalc~~~ted by Oe:ar:xent of LJbor r~~J-
IJticns (29 CFR, Part 5). Under thiS Act, contrJctors shall be r~-
qui red to pay wages to labor~rs and mechanics Jt a rat~ no: less t~Jn
the minimum "ages specifie1 in a wage deter::linaticn mace by :~e
Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors shall be reouire1 :0
pay wages 'not less often than once a '''e~~. The Gr:ant~~ shall place a
copy of the current prevailing \vage deter-nination issue1 by the De-
part::1ent of labor in each solicitation, and the al'/ard of a contract
shJll be conditioned upon the acceotance of the \'Iage deteninHion.
The Grantee shall report all suspected or reported violations to the
Grantor Agency.
F. ,,11ere applicable, all contracts a"arded by Grantees and subgnntees
in excess of 52,000 for ccnstruction contracts, and in exc~ss of
52,500 for other contracts which invohe the emoloyment of mechanics
or laborers, shall include a provision for canpliance \yith Section
103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (~O
USC 327 -330) as suppl e!::ented by Department of Labor regu1 at ions (29
CFR, Part 5). Under Section 103 of the Act, each contraotor shall be
required to cOTIpute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the
basis of a standard work day of 3 hours and a standard work week of
40 hours. Work in excess of the standard wor~ day or work week is
per-::1issible provided that the \./orker is compensated at a rate of not
less than 1-1/2 times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in
exces s of 8 hours in any c~ I enda r day or 40 hours in the' Iyork l'leek.
Section 107 of the Act is applicable to construction work and
provides that no laborer or me~hanic shall be required to work in
surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary,
hazardous, or dangerous to his health and safety as determined under
construction safety and health standards prcmulgated by the Secretary
of labor. These requirer.1ents do not apply to the purchase of sup-
plies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open
market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intel-
ligence.
G. The contract shall include notice of Grantor Agency requirements and
regulations pertaining to reporting and patent rights under any con-
tract i nvol vi ng research, developmental, experimental or demonstrJ-
tion work with respect to any discovery or invention which arises or
is developed in the course of or under such contract, and of Grantor
Agency requirements and regulations pertaining to copyrights and
rights in data.
H. All negotiated contracts (except those a"arded by small purchase pro-
cedures) awarded by Grantees shall include a provi sian to the effect
that the Grantee, the Federal Grantor Agency, the Canptroller General
of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representa-
tives, shall have access to any books, documen,s, papers, and records
of the contractor which are directly pertinent to that specific con-
tract, for the purpOSe of making audit, examination, excer~ts, and
transcriptions.
Grantees shall require ccntr~ctcrs to maintain all rec~ired rec:r-::
for thr~~ ye~rs after GranCces make fi na 1 ;:ayr::en~s and J II o,~Er
pend i ng mac Cers are closed.
I. eontr;c~s, subcontr"cts, and subgrants of amount; in exc~ss cf
5100.::)0 shall contJin a provision "hich req'.Jires c:mDli~nce ,..lith all
a6plic,,~le standar:s, orders, or requirerr:ents issued under Secticn
305 of the Cl~dn Air Act (42 use 1857[hJ), Sec':ion 508 of the Cle~n
\;ater Act :(33 USC 1368), Executive Orcer 11733, and En'/ircnmen:;j
Protection Agency regulations (40 CF;l, Part 15), "~hich prohibit the
use under non-exempt Federal contracts, grants or loans of facilities
included on the EPA List of Violating Facilities. The pro'/isicn
shall recuire reporting of violations to the Grantor .l.gency and to
the U.S. EPA Assistant Administrator for Enforcement (EM-:29).
J. Contracts shall recognize mandatory standards and policies relating
to energy efficiency which are contJined in the State energy conser-
vaticn plan issued in canpliance with the Energy Policj' and Cen-
servation Act (P.L. 94-165).
Grantor Agencies are permitted to require changes, remedies, changed
conditions, access and record retention and suspension of work
cl auses approved by the Offi ce of F edera 1 Procurement Po Ii cy.
15. Contract Administration.
GrJntees shall maintain a contract administration system insuring that
contractors perfom in accordance with the tenns, conditions. and. specifica.
tions of their contracts or purchase orders.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
COX FIELD
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Element 1 - INVENTORY
Task 1.1 Review Existincr Data
Existing data will be assembled from local, state, regional and fed-
eral sources and reviewed to provide a basis for the forecasts of
aviation demand.
Task 1.2 Aerial Photos
Aerial photos will be flown of the airport and approach areas.
Task 1.3 Determine Land Ownership and Restrictions
The existing
City and the
shown on an
report text.
airport property limits will be determined from the
County Register of Deeds. The property limits will be
"Existing Facilities" drawing to be included in the
Easements (if any) will also be shown and described.
Task 1.4 Inventorv Workshops -- Interview Business and Industrial Firms
A series of workshops will be conducted to ensure that adequate
input is receivd from all groups. Executives of firms in Paris
which rely or would rely on general aviation transportation will be
interviewed to determine specific needs in terms of airport
facilities and services. Area travel agents and other interested
groups will also be invited to attend. An immediate based aircraft
demand resulting from improved facilities will be identified in this
task and reported.
Task 1.5 Inventorv Workshop -- Pilot and Recristered Aircraft Owner Interviews
Aircraft owners and pilots will
airport improvement priorities.
the text.
be interviewed to determine local
These responses will be reported in
Task 1.6 Wind Analvsis
A wind rose will be prepared to indicate wind coverage at both 12
and 15 MPH for various runway alignments.
Element 2 - DEMAND FORECASTS
Task 2.1 Aircraft and Activitv
Forecasts will be prepared for based aircraft, aircraft operations
(activity), aircraft mix (types of aircraft), instrument approach
activity, and air passengers at Paris for the short (1989-1995),
intermediate (1996-2000) and long (2001-2010) range periods.
population forecasts, F.A.A. registered aircraft data, and
data sources will be utilized.
City
other
Element 3 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
Task 3.1 Identification of Reauired Facilities bv Phase
Airport requirements at Cox Field, based on the demand forecasts,
will be identified by phase (short, intermediate and long-range) and
presented in tabular form. Specific facilities, based on F.A.A.
criteria, safety and efficiency, to be addressed at Paris include
the following:
Runway improvements (including strength and length requirements,
and crosswind runway improvements)
Taxiway development including lighting
Aircraft parking and tiedowns
Airport lighting modifications and improvements
Property acquisition (ff any)
Property dispersal (if any)
Easement acquisition (if any)
Terminal building requirements
Auto parking
Hangars (T-type and conventional)
T-Hangar Taxiways
FBO facilities
Air freight and cargo requirements
Navigational aids, including Instrument Landing System (I.L.S.)
Automatic Weather Observation System Requirements (A.W.O.S.)
Grading requirements
Drainage (Storm sewer system)
Fencing
Marking
Fuel Facilities
Task 3.2 Evaluation of Develooment Alternatives
A preliminary Airport Layout Plan and report based on careful
deration of all alternatives will be prepared to graphically
cate the Consultant's general development recommendations.
report will be submitted to the City and the F.A.A. prior to
following meeting.
consi-
indi-
This
the
Task 3.3 Meetina
A preliminary report will be prepared and submitted to the City and
the F.A.A. A meeting (City/Consultant) will be conducted to discuss
the forecasts, relationships between local industry and the airport,
development alternatives and design alternatives available to sat-
isfy current and future demands. A preliminary Airport Layout Plan
will be discussed at this meeting.
Task 3.4 F.A.A. Review
Following completion of F.A.A. review, the preliminary report will
be discussed with the F.A.A. in Fort Worth.
Element 4 - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
An environmental assessment will be prepared in accordance with
F.A.A. Order 5050.4A entitled "Airport Environmental Handbook".
Impacts to both the human and natural environments will be assessed.
Economic and social factors, aircraft noise and land use patterns
will be considered in the human environmental analysis. Air
quality, water, vegetation, wildlife, waterfowl, and natural
resources will be considered in the natural environmental analysis.
A project Public Hearing will be offered following completion of the
preliminary environmental assessment report. If a public hearing is
requested in writing, the City will advertise and give notification
(local newspaper) of the public hearing at least thirty (30) days
prior to the hearing. The' City will then hold the hearing with the
assistance of the Consultant. All comments received up to and
during the hearing will be included in the public hearing transcript
to be prepared by the City. The Consultant will respond to all
comments and questions submitted prior to and during the hearing.
These responses will be included, in the final Environmental
Assessment which will be prepared in accordance with F.A.A. Order
5050.4A. The preliminary assessment with input from the City,
F.A.A. personnel, Executive Order 12372 Agencies, the public
hearing, and Consultant response will constitute the final
Environmental Assessment Report. This final report will be submit-
ted to F.A.A. to initiate review.
Two (2) copies of the "draft" environmental assessment will be
provided to F.A.A. for review. Ten (10) copies of the "final" envi-
ronmental assessment will be provided to F.A.A. for distribution and
coordination. The final environmental assessment will be published
separately as an independent document and capable of standing alone.
Element 5 - AIRPORT PLANS
Task 5.1 Airoort Lavout Plan
A photo base will be prepared. Existing and ultimate proposed
facilities will be indicated in accordance with Southwest Region FAA
guidelines. The rationale utilized to develop the Airport Layout
Plan will be fully documented in the report text.
Task 5.2 Terminal Area Plan
The Terminal Area Plan will be prepared on an expanded scale with
identification of recommended improvements by phase. Placement of
structures, taxiways, aircraft parking areas, clearances, auto park-
ing, and perhaps related commercial facilities will be indicated in
detail.
Task 5.3 Approach Plan
The Approach Plan will be traced over a U.S.G.S. base map. The
purpose of this plan is for utilization by the City in preventing
airport airspace obstructions and can be included in a future zoning
ordinance.
Task 5.4 Approach and Clear Zone Drawinqs (two sheetsl
Plan and profile views of the current and ultimate approach and
clear zone areas will be prepared to provide information to ensure
continued obstruction-free approaches to the runways. '
Task 5.5 Area Land Use Photo (Off-Sitel
A high altitude photo will be taken at the time of the layout plan
photos. This photo will be reproduced at scale of 1" = 1000' to
show the area surrounding the airport. Existing land use, the air-
port approach areas, existing airport property limits, City limits,
planning area; etc. will be identified. Potential conflicts with
respect to obstructions and aircraft noise (if any) will be reported
as well as recommended methods to resolve present conflicts and
avoid future conflicts.
Task 5.6 Airport/Industrial Development Site Plan
On the same photo base used for the Airport Layout Plan, the Airport
Industrial Site Plan will identify land use within the airport
property. Existing lease areas, additional areas available for
'lease, and potential industrial development sites will be
identified.
Element 6 - FINANCING
Task 6.1 Schedule of Priorities
Information
pilots will
importance.
obtained from local industries, business firms, and
be related to physical improvements in order of local
A general phasing program will be formulated.
Task 6.2 Cost Estimates
Development costs will be estimated for each development item.
Quantities, unit costs, total cost and probable local costs will be
established for each item for each of the three phases. The items
included in each phase will be adjusted based on total cost. 8-1/2"
x 11" drawings will be prepared, to readily indicate each phase of
development.
. ,
Task 6.3 Pavement Manacrement Plan
Specific uses of the pavement areas will be addressed to
long-term and short-term requirements. A scheduled
management/maintenance plan will be prepared.
determine
pavement
Task 6.4 Financial Plan
The airport's development history will be researched to identify
land credit opportunities, if any. Recommendations for increasing
airport revenues will be identified based on the Consultant's exper-
ience at other similar airports. A method of financing each devel-
opment phase will be formulated with emphasis on solving current
problems economically. A project to alleviate current deficiencies
will be assembled and a preapplication for federal assistance will
be prepared, if requested.
Task 6.5 Economic Imoact Assessment & Develooment Plan
A detailed economic impact study will be performed to indicate the
importance of the'airport and airport-related industrial development
to the Paris/Lamar County area economic base. Direct and indirect
benefits will be quantified. Direct benefits will include airport
employee payrolls and direct local purchases by airport commercial
and 'operational activities. A multiplier will be developed to
quantify the indirect or "spinoff" benefits which flow through the
community as a result of payroll and direct purchases.
An analysis of the Community will be conducted to identify those
elements that the City of Paris can promote to gain an advantage in
the City's economic development program. In addition, the primarily
physical factors associated with industrial development (as iden-
tified in Task 5.6) must be communicated through on organized
development team. Recommendations on economic development
strategies, team organization, marketing, and networking will be
addressed in this task.
Element 7 - MEETINGS AND FINAL REPORT
Task 7.1 Meetincrs
Two meetings in addition to Task 3.3 will be required. These are
not scheduled at particular times but will be held when required.
Task 7.2 Final Reoort
A final report will be assembled from the information developed in
previous work tasks, edited, and printed in ten (10) preliminary
copies for review. These copies will be submitted to the local
review committee and F.A.A. to be reviewed for thirty (30) days. If
no comments are received during that period, thirty (30) copies of
the final report will be printed and submitted to the City of Paris.
Each final report will contain reduced copies of the plan drawings.
In addition, five (5) sets of full-size prints of the drawings will
be submitted to the City along with the original mylar tracings.
The final environmental assessment will be published separately and
be capable of standing alone. Ten (10) copies will be submitted to
F.A.A. for distribution and coordination.
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
COX FIELD
PARIS, TEXAS
COST/ TOTAL OVERHEAD (118%)
WORK ITEM MANHOURS HOUR LABOR & PROFIT (15%) EXPENSES TOTAL
STAGE 1
Element 1 - Inventorv
Task 1.1 Review 8 $19.50 $ 156 $ 207 $ 600 $ 963
16 12.00 192 255 447
Task 1.2 Aerial Photos 24 9.00 216 287 503
Aircraft & Lab. 1,800 1,800
Task 1.3 Property/Restrictions 16 12.00 192 255 447
Task 1.4 Bus. Interviews 8 12.00 96 128 224
Task 1.5 Pilot Interviews 8 12.00 96 128 224
Task 1.6 Wind Analysis .-ll 12.00 192 255 -i1l
TOTAL, Element 1 96 $ 1,140 $ 1,515 $2,400 $ 5,055
Element 2 - Demand Forecasts
Task 2.1 Aircraft & Activity 15 19.50 293 390 683
~ 12.00 311 414 725
TOTAL, Element 2 41 $ 604 $ 804 0' $ 1,408
Element 3 - Facilitv Recruirements
Task 3.1 Requirements 40 19.50 780 1,037 1,817
8 12.00 96 128 224
Task 3.2 Alternatives 40 19.50 780 1,037 1,817
Task 3.3 Meeting 8 19.50 156 207 600 963
8 34.00 272 362 200 834
8 12.00 96 128 224
Task 3.4 F.A.A. Review J 19.50 156 207 363
TOTAL, Element 3 120 $ 2,336 $ 3,106 $ 800 $ 6,242
Element 4 - Environmental Assessment
Initial Coordination 2 19.50 39 52 91
6 12.00 72 96 168
Review of Facility Requirements
& Phases 2 19.50 39 52 91
6 12.00 72 96 168
Area Environment (FIELD) &
Site Analysis 8 19.50 156 207 600 963
16 12.00 192 255 447
Evaluate Alternatives 4 34.00 136 181 317
16 19.50 312 415 727
COST/ TOTAL OVERHEAD (118%)
WORK ITEM MANHOURS HOUR LABOR & PROFIT (15%) EXPENSES TOTAL
Affected Environment 8 19.50 156 207 363
16 12.00 192 255 447
Environmental Consequences
Specific Impacts 6 19.50 117 156 273
10 12.00 120 160 280
F.A.A. Coordination 16 19.50 312 415 727
F.A.A. Site Inspection 16 19.50 312 415 600 1,327
Review Coordination 4 34.00 136 181 317
Clerical 20 7.00 140 186 600 926
Public Hearing 8 19.50 156 207 363
-1&. 12.00 192 255 447
TOTAL, Element 4 180 $ 2,851 $ 3,791 $1,800 $ 8,442
STAGE I
Element 5 - Airport Plans
Task 5.1 Airport Layout Plan 16 19.50 312 415 727
64 12.00 768 1,021 300 2,089
Task 5.2 Terminal Area Plan 16 12.00, , 192 255 447
48 9.00 432 574 100 1,106
Task 5.3 Approach Plan 4 1~.00 48 64 112
20 9.00 180 239 100 519
Task 5.4 Approach & Clear Zones 10 12.00 120 160 280
100 9.00 900 1,197 100 2,197
Task 5.5 Area Land Use Plan 4 19.50 78 104 182
28 9.00 252 335 200 787
Task 5.6 Industrial Site Plan -l1 24.00 768 1. 021 ---1.QQ 1. 989
TOTAL, Element 5 342 $ 4,050 $ 5,385 $1,000 $10,435
Element 6 - Financina
Task 6.1 Priorities 8 19.50 156 207 363
16 12.00 192 255 447
Task 6.2 Cost Estimates 8 19.50 156 207 363
Task 6.3 Pavement Management 28 18.00 504 670 1,174
Task 6.4 Finance Plan 10 24.00 240 319 559
Task 6.5 Economic Impact -iQ. 12.00 480 638 1.118
TOTAL, Element 6 110 $ 1,728 $ 2,296 $ 4,024
Element 7 - Meetinas & Final Report
Task 7.1 Meetings (2) 16 34.00 544 724 600 1,868
16 19.50 312 415 1,200 1,927
Task 7.2 Final Report 40 19.50 780 1,037 1,817
(Review) 8 34.00 272 362 634
(Edit) 16 15.00 240 319 559
(Typing) 30 7.00 210 279 489
(Printing) 2,100 2,100
TOTAL, Element 7 126 $ 2,358 $ 3,136 $3,900 $ 9,394
TOTAL PROJECT 1,015 $15,067 $20,033 $9,900 $45,000
"'--"
7~ (Q!L~lt @J!l ~~:mtIl~
March 31, 1989
Federal Aviation Administration
Airports Division, ASW-610
4400 Blue Mound Road
P. O. l3ox,1689
Fort Worth, Texas 76101
RE: Cox Field-Paris Texas
Airport Master Plan
Application for Federal
Assistance AlP (Airport
Improvement Program)
Oear Sirs:
The City of Paris is interested in ,proceeding with the preparation
of an updated Airport Master Plan to provide gUidance for the continued
development of Cox Field. Our current plan \1aS prepared in 1972 and is
now out-of-date. With recent changes in FAA design criteria and
policies and because of the changing character of aviation nationwide,
it is important that we re-evaluate our airport development program.
The plan will enable us to establish prioritip.s and to assemble a
detailed phased improvement plan. '
Enclosed are the forms required for our application for federal
assistance. The City is hereby requesting a federal grant of $40,500.
This grant is to be matched with $4,500 of City funds. The City has
ad~quate funds on hand for this project and it is our desire to advance
the planning study promptly so that we may be eligible for future
A.J.P. construction funding.
,
The enclosed preapplication has been prepared by Bucher, Willis &
Ratliff, Consulting Engineers, Planners and Architects. Should you
have any questions or require additional information to process this
application, please contact Mr. Ray Flemons at Bucher, Willis &
Ratliff, 214-581-7844.
Very truly yours,
Eric S. Clifford
Mayor
P.O. BOX 1037 . PARIS, TEXAS 75460 . 214-785-7511
CYl-l!RIT t,
PART I
FAA "FORM 424
OM8 Aoon::N~ No. QJ..46....<<'()o
FEDERAL ASSIST ANC 2. APPU. L HUMBER 3. "'E L NUMBER
CANTS J.
APPIJ. CAnoN
1. TYPE CATION IDENn.
OF 0 NQna; OF I><TENT {OPTIC<'<ALJ 1DE1m- b.DATE . FlEA b. OA TE
FlEA liOTE.: TO BE
SUBJ.CI5SX)N 0 You _<-l "'1 ASSIGNED Y= _r' "'1
(MU'i y- PREAPI'UCA noN . ;;0.4 :.H ASSIOHED
1'"P''''' [] APl'UCA noN 1; 89 BY STATE 19
....-C.'""" J
[.".~
B 14M.
.(. LEGAL APf'UCVfTJAEOPlEHT .S. EMPLOYER IDENTIACA TlON NUMBER (E1N)
L ~ N4mo City of Paris ..
b. Qroormtlon Unit City ..
c. StrM1/P.O. Box P. O. Box 1037 ffio. L NUMBER WillJJoJ..uJ
~ GRAM
d. 01y . Paris ~. Coumy. " Lamar
f.Sl&~ Texas g. ZlP Code. 75460 (F""" CFDAI MULTIPLE 0
..
h. Contact Pwxlo (N~",., Earl Smith, City Engineer b. TIT1..E Airport
dTc/~,No.J 214:"785-75l1 Improvement Program
< 7. TTTl.E (;IF APPUCANrS PROJECT (UN S<<'tion IV 01 t:hC:& torm to prov;de . 1l.mITl.IIY do-..."""I:i...... 01 tlie e. TYPE OF APPUCANT/AEOPIENT
~
d proioc1.l '-'- ---_ C>ooz
~ -- "-< """"'f~~
Z Preparation of Airport l'.aster Plan for Cox Field c-.-- .......... """-'" -
~ -- ......-.r_
~ ~(~):
~ [-00,
,--""'" Erour ___Im.n- ~
~
~
"
~ O. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT (NtlJrWG o{dJia. C'Ot/"rid. U4La..~L' '0. .ESTIMATED NUMBER 11. TYPE OF ASSIST ANa;
1 OF PERSONS BENEFmNG .-...- .... ----
Lamar County. and part of adjacent'tounties ,. ~0twIl [-"'-
g 50,000 Co-'- u-_ rn
,... -.
::{ 1:1. PflOf'OSED AJNOING 13. CCNGRESSIOIW. OISTRICTS OF: ". TYPE OF AP1'UCA noN
I .-...- 0;.......-. [ . .
.00 . L APPUCANT b. PROJECl'. .. .. ~ C)........C~
.. FECERAl s 40,500 i Lc_~,- []
4,500 01 01
b. APPUClJfT .00 17. TY?EOFOWiGE (,., {k./~I
1 e. PROJECT .-.......- "'-' ~(~):
STATE .00 ". PROJECT START ---- "'-'
OATE DURA noN 0:-....- a.- N/A
Y.... -'" ...., ~a.-
'-. .... lOCAL .00 ,~
I 1; 89 07 IS , 1 ? """',.,.
.. OTI-iE"A .00 "18. DATE DUE TO Entw~ DTI
YN' _<-l oIq ;nc"'I<<Jwf~"
,I. To<o/ Is 45,000 .00 i FEDERAL AGENCY. . ';89 04 15 I
i 19. FEDERAl. AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST Federal Aviation Administration 20. E):ISTING FElJERAI. GRANT
100NTlACATlON NUMBER
L ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT {IF APPROf'RIA TEl . Ib. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT (IF KNOWN) N/A
Airports Division -ASH-610 Mr. John Anderson
Co ADDRESS 4400 Blue Mound .. 21. REMARKS ADDEO
Road
P.O. Box 1689 76101 IXl Y.. o No
Fort Worth TX
6 22. To~l:>e:Jtojmy~aod~, L YES. nilS NOTICE Of INTENT/PREAPPLJCATION/APPLICATION WAS MAOE AVAILABLE TO niE STATE
niE data .. "'" pc...",..,.oon/ll>POcatlon EXECUTIVE OROE1l'2f6 ffiOCESS FOR REVIEW ON:
~ It'I true and eornc1.. J:T)I doa.lmerrt ha . DATE Anr; 1 ] 9119
il APPLJCANT.
~ OORTIFlES boo<1 0Xf """"""'d by .... oo.-.~'"
~ THAT~ body 0(.... -=*" 1Ind.... ~ b. NO. PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E.O. 12372 0
~ ril """'*t""" .... .- .....-.nceoo
if the. .:::...~ . OR ffiOGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW 0
~ 23. L TYPm NAME mo TIT1..E b. SIGNATURE
t; OORTIFYING -Michaer E. Ma 1 one, City Manager . '
::{ REffiE.
SENT A T1Y<
2'. APPIJC),. Y..,. _010 oIq . 2'. FEOERAI.~CA T10Ii 1~F1CA noN NUMBER 12tl. FE:DERAI. GRANT loomACA TION
TION
REC8YED 1;
27. ACTION TAKEN 28: FUNOING . YN' fTtfHI(Jr "'1 30. Ynv !'HHtllt "'''
~ Cl L AWARDED ,.' STARTING
211. ACT10H OA TE. 19 DATE 19
l! ~ Cl b. REJECTED L FEDERAL s . .00 31. CONTACT FOR AOOITIOHAL lNFORMA. 32- rtGl'motftlt "'''
~ Cl Co REruRNED FOR nON (tlUf'tll rut.ti lI(cp/totw I'lllmOcrJ . ENDING
AMENDO.<ENr b. APl'I.JCANT .00 OATE 19
1 d. REruRNED FOR Co STATE .00
~''".i E.O. 12372 SUBMISSJON 33. REMARKS AlJOED
BY APPUCANT TO Q. LCClJ.. I .00
:l STATE I
Cl .. OEf'ERREO .. OTHER .00
0. I. WlTliC<'\A WN I. TOTAL s .00 0 DNa
Y..
.
PART II
PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION
v.:_ :c:r::':17;.:C::,i::;;: ~;;:;'''.;S;::C"7'':'7,C:~
;~;:C:i'\":'i.. ;....:.:. ;;\.,;~; ':'C:.::,'l:::" "':","!A ;:':.'i
;'."i ..... j;' ~ : 11.
PART II
PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION
SECTION A
,Item 1.
Does this assistance request require Stote, local,
regional, or other priority raring?
Yes
Item 2.
Does this assislance request require State, or loco/
advisory, educational or health clearances?
Yes
Item 3.
Does this assistance request require clearinghouse revi~w
in accordance with OMB Circular A-95?
X Yes
No
(Attoch Comments)
Correspondence initiating this review are
attached. Comments have been forwarded to
F.A.A. and are now on file.
Item'4.
Does this assistance request require Stote, local,
regional or other planning approval?
Ye,
x
No
Check one: State 0
Local 0
Regional 0
X No Location of plan
Name of Federal Installation
X No Federal Population benefiting from Project
Nome of Federal Installation
Location of Federal Land
X No Percent of Project
Item 5.
Is rhe proposed project covered by an approved
comprehensive plan?
Yes
Item 6.
Will the assistance requested
installation?
serve a Federal
Yes
Item 7.
Will the assistance requested
ar installation?
be on Federal land
Yes
Item 8.
Will the assistance requested have an
on the environment?
impact or effect
Yes X
No
Item 9.
WiJlrhe assistonce requested Couse the displacement of
individual 1 families, businesses, or farms?
'Ye5
X
Ilem 10.
I s there other reI ated F edera I ass i stance on th i s
proiec:t previous, pending, or anticipated?
Yes X No
Pog_ 2
Name of Governing Body
Priority Rating
x
No
Nome of Agency or
Board
x
No (Attach Documentation)
Nome of'Approving Agency
Dote
See instruction for additional information to be
provided,
No
Number of:
Individuol s
Families
Businesses
Forms
See instructions for additional information 10 be
provided.
FAA Form 5100.100 16-711 SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100.10 PAGES I THRU 7
z
!'1
...
-<
~
...
~
i
i
o
-<
z
o
;:
-<
;;
-<
-'
-<
~
w
o
w
u.
. !J
0
<
.;
0 "0 ~ 0 0 0
, .. 0 0 "0 0 0
. ... 0 .. ~ 0 0
, - ^ ... ^ ^
0 . V) V) V)
. ""I "" "" ""
~
, ~ ~
'" ~ ~ ~
~
.
. ~
,-
> ~
. :.~ .
~ ,
.
- z
.
, ~ ~
. 'i"
z ~ ~ ~
i:! "
z :f
0 >- u. ~
'" w :(
f- <( '"
<( '" 0 ~
'" '" ~ ~ '" <
"" ::J W "
0 ~ .... v C
~ <
u.. .... 0 <( , ~ ~ ~
z u u.
W ~ 0
'" ~~ V) .... ..
f- ^ w 0
W c l " '" '" ,
::J .
'" , < c 0:
<D U.
. ::J
0 ~ z E
:::J I . <D 0
..
al . I <3
<( - ~ ~ <Xl ,
I ~
,
Z < Z
- 0 ~ 0
-
- ~ " ~
.... 0 S .... - ~ ~
f- u .. - 0 U
"" w " i~ 0 w
-<( ~ V) ~
"- w ~ .
u. 0
"" p, 0 0
0 0 ~
H 0 0
~ ~ ^ .
...: V) V)
I "" '"
0
; ;: ...
1 z ~ - ~ ~ ~ <
<
f ~ ...
~ ;: -
u. f, .
v, c
~
<
...
.
~ v
~
" :G "
= = :i
~ ;;;
... ~
.. ~ ~ ~ ~
u u =
~ :; > ~ ii ;;; E
P, e tl 0 :.
li~~ ~ e '2 ~ u
,'- ~ '" ~ " " " u -"
ci: u 13 <D ~ tl f
H ~ e ~ ~ tl i5 t ~
< -' ~ " -' E
, v e ~ E ~
~u. -< ...: <( tl 0 = '" = c. ;;; :;; ... " <( ~ v
.... ~ ~ e !;; '5 " .... o.
<3 :;; = e ~ <5 'i5 r
0 E .;:: a 0 0 0 0
(l. ~ 6 .... -" 0::
.... 0 >- w ~ u u .... ,
. u.
-' '" ..; ~ .n .D .. .d U -d ,; -' ... .d ,- ,- ..i ~ .
-
u.
M
,
o
(l.
~
.
-
o
z
<
.
-
,
z
z
o
F
-<
>-
'"
o
0..
~
'"
>-
u.
o
>-
~
"
>-
'"
-<
0..
W
o
Z
0.
>=
~
'"
...
"
z
'i
0.
~
Z
0.
>=
~
;;:
~
.J
~
'"
W
0.
W
...
~ . ~
.J I~ I~ ...
~ , '" '" !
... ~ ~ , N :J
0. 0. ~ ~ 0. I
... ~ ...
..! . 0 I- i::: t- -
..; .; ~ U .! I
UJ
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 I
~ a:
IU a.
u UJ ~
'" '"
:J . lor :r: ~ 0.
0. , '" I:? t- IU '"
~ , N N ?:;
'" 0. ~ ~ N u.. ~
w ~ ~ ...
z n 0 ~ ~ 0 0. "
... Q
0. ~ ~ UJ '"
';: I u w
~ ~ ~ ~ z .. ~ ~ C
...: "
..J z 0.
,-
...: 0. -
co z Z U
:J 2
IU . ... 0. 0
'" '" lor '"
UJ ... 0 , '" 0 0 w z ;:: ~
~ , N '" 0. C
U N '"
... UJ 0. ~ ~ N u.. :J u ...:
'" ~ UJ ~ ... IU '" ~
::::J " , 0' :J ~
Z N 0 ~ ~ UJ ... - '" a.
0 ~ ~ .! 0 ;:
'" :r: 0 u.. , ...c
UJ V> UJ u
'" ...: ~ ~ UJ ~ ~ z . a
~ ~ . I
u z "
..J t- i ~
...: 0 V> UJ
'" ... UJ 0 '-' " UJ
UJ z t- ; Z 0 . >
< '" '" 0 .
0 V> N '" ::::J ::::J I
~I~ ~ ...: , N :;; . t-
UJ ~ ~ N u.. CO ~
U , !!! ~ ...:
u.. 0.
UJ ..J ... '" ... '" I
. , 0 ~ ~ ,
z il", '" - ~ ~ ...: e UJ " '"
0 " 0 '" :r: ...:
z u.. UJ t- ~ z I
~
0 ~ ~ 0 . '"
I ~ ~ I ~ ~ UJ ~
I " ...:
u 0 u.. . '"
Z z : u.. u.. 3- '-'
2 0 >- 0 Z 0
t- t- V> 0 '"
, 0 0 0 UJ a.
U I U - 0 0 0 t-
UJ I UJ ~ '" '" 0 t- U >
V> V> . ...: UJ -
. 0 -<t '" '" V> t-
o -<t -<t t- '"
I ... V> ...:
~ ~ UJ a.
t-
IE UJ
'-' E
.
I{ 0 .
::::J .
OJ ~
I ;
. !
<3 UJ <3
., '" . !
'M Z
... 0
'" t-
o.. U I
..., UJ .
.
0. V> . . I
It ... . ,
, ~ I
; ~ ~ U
~ 1 u
"r< .J ... .J .J : ~
~ ~ ... ~ < ;; ,
U ... , ... ... .~ " E
0. . . 0. 0. 1 .
... ... Z ... ... 0. '"
~ ~ .; - ~ ~ :: " ~ N ..; .: c - N ~
N N N N
o
<
.
o
,
.
,
o
z
0.
;::
...
I-
'"
~
~
'"
....
..
0.
I-
%
w
i!
'"
...
0-
W
0.
"
Item 3
APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
PART II
Clearinghouse review is required. Copies of correspondence initiat-
ing this review are included. Comments will be forwarded to F.A.A.
on receipt.
, ,
PART III
PROPOSED DESCRIPTION OF WORK
"
.......~: ...
AND BUDGET INFORMATION
SCOPE OF SERVICES
COX FIELD
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Element 1 - INVENTORY
Task 1.1 Review Existinq Data
Existing data will be assembled from local, state, regional and fed-
eral sources and reviewed to provide a basis for the forecasts of
aviation demand.
Task 1.2 Aerial Photos
Aerial photos will be flown of the airport and approach areas.
Task 1.3 Determine Land Ownership and Restrictions
The existing
City and the
shown on an
report text.
airport property limits will be determined from the
County- Register "of Deeds. The property limits will be
"Existing Facilities" drawing to be included in the
Easements (if any) will also be shown and described.
Task 1.4 Inventorv WorkshoPS -- Interview"Business and !ndustrial Firms
A series of workshops will be conducted to ensure that adequate
input is receivd from all groups. Executives of firms in Paris
which rely or would rely on general aviation transportation will be
interviewed to determine specific needs in terms of airport
facilities and services. Area travel agents and other interested
groups will also be invited to attend. An immediate based aircraft
demand resulting from improved facilities will be identified in this
task and reported.
Task 1.5 Inventorv Workshop -- pilot and Reqistered Aircraft Owner Interviews
Aircraft owners and pilots will be interviewed to determine local
airport improvement priorities. These responses will be reported in
the text. '
Task 1.6 Wind Analvsis
A wind rose will be prepared to indicate wind coverage at both 12
and 15 MPH for various runway alignments.
Element 2 - DEMAND FORECASTS
Task 2.1 Aircraft and Activitv
Forecasts will be prepared for based aircraft, aircraft operations
(activity), aircraft mix (types of aircraft), instrument approach
activity, and air passengers at Paris for the short (1989-1995),
,
"0_..
intermediate (1996-2000) and long (2001-2010) range periods.
population forecasts, F.A.A. registered aircraft data, and
data sources will be utilized.
City
other
Element 3 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
Task 3.1 Identification of ReQUired Facilities bv Phase
Airport requirements at Cox Field, based on the demand forecasts,
will be identified by phase (short, intermediate' and long-range) and
presented in tabular form. Specific facilities, based on F.A.A.
criteria, safety and efficiency, to be addressed at Paris include
the following:
Runway improvements (including strength and length requirements,
and crosswind runway improvements)
Taxiway development including lighting
Aircraft parking and tiedowns
Airport lighting modifications and improvements
Property acquisition (1f any)
Property dispers~l (if any)
Easement-acquisition (if any)
Terminal building requirements
Auto parking ,
Hangars (T-type and conventio~al)
T-Hangar Taxiways
FBO facilities
Air freight, and cargo requirements
Navigational aids, including Instrument Landing System (I.L.S.)
Automatic Weather Observation System Requirements (A.W.O.S.)
Grading requirements
Drainage (Storm sewer system)
Fencing
Marking
Fuel Facilities
Task 3.2 Evaluation of Development Alternatives
A preliminary Airport Layout Plan and report based on careful
deration of all alternatives will be prepared to graphically
cate the Consultant's general development recommendations.
report will be submitted to the City and the F.A.A. prior to
following meeting.
consi-
indi-
This
the
Task 3.3 Meetinq
A preliminary report will be prepared and submitted to the City' and
the F.A.A. A meeting- (City/Consultant) will be conducted to discuss
the forecasts, relationships between local industry and the airport,
development alternatives and'design alternatives available to sat-
isfy current and future demands. A preliminary Airport Layout Plan
will be discussed at this meeting.
Task 3.4 F,A.A. Review
Following completion of F.A.A. review, the preliminary report will
be discussed with the F.A.A. in Fort Worth.
Element 4 - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
An environmental assessment will be prepared in accordance with
F.A.A. Order S050.4A entitled "Airport Environmental Handbook".
Impacts to both the human and natural environments will be assessed.
Economic and social factors, aircraft noise and land use patterns
will be considered in the human environmental analysis. Air
quality, water, vegetation, wildlife, waterfowl, and natural
resources will be considered in the natural environmental analysis.
A project Public Hearing will be offered following completion of the
Preliminary environmental assessment report. If a public hearing is
requested in writing, the City will advertise and give notification
(local newspaper) of the ~ublic hearing at least thirty (30) days
prior to the hearing. The City will then hold the hearing with the
assistance of the,Consultant'. All cormnents received up to and
during the hearing will be included in the public hearing transcript
to be prepared by the City. The Consultant will respond to all
cormnents and questions submitted prior to and during the hearing.
Thes€, responses will be included 'in th€ 'final Environmental
Assessment which will be prepared in accordance with F.A.A. Order
SOSO.4A. The preliminary assessment with input from the City,
F.A.A. personnel, Executive Order 12372 Ag€ncies, the public
hearing, and Consultant response will constitute the final
Environmental Assessment Report. This final report will be submit-
ted to F.A.A. to initiate review.
Two (2) copies of the "draft" environmental assessment will be
provided to F.A.A. for review. Ten (10) copies of the "final" envi-
ronmental assessment will be provided to F.A.A. for distribution and
coordination. The final environmental assessment will be published
separately as an independent document and capable of standing alone.
Element 5 - AIRPORT PLANS
Task 5.1 Airoort Lavout Plan
A photo base will be prepared. Existing and ultimate proposed
facilities will be indicated in accordance with Southwest Region FAA
guidelines. The rationale utilized to develop the Airport Layout
Plan will be fully documented in the report text.
Task 5.2 Terminal Area Plan
The Terminal Area Plan will be prepared on an expanded scale with
identification of recommended improvements by phase. Placement of
structures, taxiways, aircraft parking areas, clearances, auto park-
ing, and perhaps related commercial facilities will be indicated in
detail.
Task 5,3 Aooroach Plan
The Approach Plan will be traced over a ,U.S.G.S. base map. The
purpose of this plan is for utilization by the City in preventing
airport airspace obstructions and can be included in a future zoning
ordinance.
Task 5.4 Aooroach and Clear Zone Drawinqs (two sheets)
Plan and profile views of the current and ultimate approach and
clear zone areas will be prepared to provide information to ensure
continued obstruction-free 'approaches to the runways.
Task 5.5 Area Land Use Photo (Off-Site)
A high altitude photo will be taken at the time of the layout plan
photos. This photo will be reproduced at scale of 1" = 1000' to
show the area surrounding the airport. Existing land use, the air-
port approach areas, existing'airport property limits, City limits,
planning area, etc. will be identified. Potential conflicts with
respect to obstructions and aircraft noise (if any) will be reported
as well as recommended methods to resolve present conflicts and
avoid future conflicts.
Task '5.6 Airoort/Industrial Development Site Plan
On the same photo base used for the Airport Layout Plan, the Airport
Industrial Site Plan will identify land use within the airport
property. Existing lease areas, additional areas available for
lease, and potential industrial development sites will be
identified.
Element 6 - FINANCING
Task 6.1 Schedule of Priorities
Information obtained from local industries, business firms, and
pilots will be related to physical improvements in order of local
importance. ' A general phasing program will be formulated.
Task 6.2 Cost Estimates
Development costs will be estimated for each development item.
Quantities, unit costs, total cost and probable local costs will be
established for each item for each of the three phases. The items
,included in each phase will be adjusted based on total cost. 8-1/2"
x 11" drawings will be prepared, to readily indicate each phase' of
development.
Task 6.3 Pavement Manaqement Plan
Specific uses of the pavement areas will be addressed to
long-term and short-term requirements. A scheduled
management/maintenance plan will be prepared.
determine
pavement
Task 6.4 Financial Plan
The airport's development history will be researched to identify
land credit opportunities, if any. Recommendations for increasing
airport revenues will be identified based on the Consultant's exper-
ience at other similar airports. A method of financing each devel-
opment phase will be formulated with emphasis on solving current'
problems economically. A project to alleviate current deficiencies
will be assembled and a preapplication for federal assistance will
be prepared, if requested.
Task 6.5 Economic Imoact Assessmen~ & Deve100ment Plan,
A detailed economi.c impact study will be performed to indicate the
importance of the airport and airport-related industrial development
to the Paris/Lamar County area economic base. Direct and indirect
benefits will be quantified: Direct benefits will include airport
employee payrolls and direct local purchases by airport commercial
and operational activities. A multiplier will be developed to
quantify the indirect or "spinoff" benefits which flow through the
community as a result of payroll and direct purchases.
An analysis of the Community will be conducted to identify those
elements that the 'City of Paris can promote to gain an advantage in
the City's economic development program. In addition, the primarily
physical factors,associated with industrial development (as 'iden-
tified in Task 5.6) must be communicated through on organized
development team. Recommendations on economic development
strategies, team organization, marketing, and networking will be
addressed in this task.
Element 7 - MEETINGS AND FINAL REPORT
Task 7.1 Meetinqs
Two meetings in addition to Task 3.3 will be required. These are
not scheduled at particular times b~ will be held when required.
Task 7.2 Final Reoort
A final report will be assembled from the information developed in
previous work tasks, edited, and printed in ten (10) preliminary
copies for review. These copies will be submitted to the local
review committee and F.A.A. to be reviewed for thirty (30) days. If
no comments are received during that period, thirty (30) copies of
the final report will be printed and submitted to the City of Paris.
Each final report will contain reduced copies of the plan drawings.
In addition, five (5) sets of full-size prints of the drawings will
be' submitted to the City along with the original mylar tracings.
.......
The final environmental assessment will be published separately and
be capable of standing alone. Ten (10) copies will be submitted to
r:A.A. for distribution and coordination.
),....:-.,.'
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
COX FIELD
PARIS, TEXAS
COST/ TOTAL OVERHEAD (118%)
WORK ITEM MANHOURS HOUR LABOR & PROFIT (15%) EXPENSES TOTAL
Affected Environment 8 19.50 156 207 363
16 12.00 192 255 447
Environmental Consequences
Specific Impacts 6 19.50 117 156 273
10 12.00 120 160 280
F.A.A. Coordination 16 19.50 312 415 727
F.A.A. Site Inspection 16 19.50 312 415 600 1,327
Review Coordination 4 34.00 136 181 317
Clerical 20 7.00 140 186 600 926
Public Hearing 8 19.50 156 207 363
-1.2. 12.00 192 255 447
TOTAL, Element 4 180 $ 2,851 $ 3,791 $1,800 $ 8,442
STAGE I
Element 5 - Airport Plans
Task 5.1 Airport Layout Plan 16 19.50 312 415 727
64 12.00 768 1,021 300 2,089
Task 5.2 Terminal Area ~lan 16 12.00.. ....192 255 447
48 9.00 432 574 100 1,106
Task 5.3 Approach Plan 4 12.00 48 64 112
20 9.00 180 239 100 519
.ask 5.4 Approach & Clear Zones 10 12.00 120 160 280
100 9.00 900 1,197 100 2,197
Task 5.5 Area Land Use Plan 4 19.50 78 104 182
28 9.00 252 335 200 787
Task 5.6 Industrial Site Plan -1Z. 24.00 768 1, 021 -1.QQ 1.989
TOTAL, Element 5 342 $ 4,050 $ 5,385 $1,000 $10,435
Element 6 - Financinq
Task 6.1 Priorities 8 19.50 156 207 363
16 12.00 192 255 447
Task 6.2 Cost Estimates 8 19.50 156 207 363
Task 6.3 Pavement Management 28 18.00 504 670 1,174
Task 6.4 Finance Plan 10 24.00 240 319 559
Task 6.5 Economic Impact ...iQ 12.00 480 638 1. 118
TOTAL, Element 6 110 $ 1,728 $ 2,296 $ 4,024
Element 7 - Meetinqs & Final Report
Task 7.1 Meetings (2) 16 34.00 544 724 600 1,868
16 19.50 312 415 1,200 1,927
Task 7.2 Final Report 40 19.50 780 1,037 1,817
(Review) 8 34.00 272 362 634
(Edit) 16 15.00 240 319 559
(Typing) 30 7.00 210 279 489
(Printing) 2,100 2.100
l'OTAL, Element 7 126 $ 2,358 $ 3,136 $3,900 $ 9,394
TOTAL PROJECT 1,015 $15,067 $20,033 $9,900 $45,000
. PART IV
PROGRAM NARRATIVE
PART IV
PROGRAM NARRATIVE
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
COX FIELD
PARIS, TEXAS
1. Oblective: The purpose of this project is to prepare an Airport Master
Plan, modified for local conditions, to guide in the development of Cox
Field, Paris, Texas. The specific objectives of the study are: (1) to
prepare forecasts of based qircraft, aircraft operations, and passen-
gers; (2) to determine the facilities required over the plan period to
meet the aviation demands of the area; (3) to determine the monetary
requirements for necessary improvements to airport facilities; and (4) to
determine measures necessary to ensure the compatabi1ity of the airport
with the surrounding community. As part of the Master Plan, a complete
Environmental Assessment will be performed followed by a public hearing
to consider the economic, social and environmental effects of airport
development.
2. Benefits Anticipated: Adequate information. upon which to evaluate air-
port development alternatives is not now available. The results of this
planning study will enable the City to determine the current and future
aviation demand at the airport and guide development of facilities, by
phase, to safely meet these demand~ most economically and with respect to
current FAA development criteria and standards.
Our original Airport Master Plan was developed in 1972, and is now
out-of-date. Since that time, there have been significant changes in
F.A.A. design criteria and policy and significant changes in the
. character of aviation throughout the Country. The City has been
successful in our efforts to maintain industrial growth and aircraft
operations by businesses appear to be above average. Currently, the
airport has approximately 40 based aircraft, with an estimated 22,000
annual operations.
3. Prolect Approach: (See detailed Scope of Services, attached.)
4. Geoqraphical Location: The airport is located approximately five miles
to the east of the City of Paris in Lamar County, Texas.
5. Force Accounts: This study will be accomplished entirely by consultant
services. No force account work will be performed.
6. Sponsor's Representative: Earl Smith, City Engineer of Paris at
214-785-7511, shall be the City's representative for this project.
.;
PART V
ASSURANCES AND
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 CORRESPONDENCE
~
V1oo..-v... _"
~ ----
--
-
Part V . Assurances
AJrport and P~nnlng A~ncy Spon$ars
~ COole No ,1<Q-006.l
... o.nenl.
1. TheM usu~ sh&i1 e.. compj-.d Wlt!\ 111 the per'.ot'rNra 01 the 100000wm," grlnt .'Or"".."I.5.
I. ~ o.v.lop'ne(\l, '''"pon pI~ nn,,",,". II'd r<liw pn:w;rlm imple mtnUtion g~nts to lvpot1 s;x>nI01"S
b. ~t~ avport IIy1lem plln"'n<;/ grwnU to plann"'9 l~nc,.S.
2. n..u usurw~ Ire ~Ulred 10 pe sub,""t~ .s P-In of the P10Ieel ~pli~hon by sponsors r...~tJng "'I'ds ~ the P'O'<IS''''''
01 the AJr;x><1'1'd AJrway Improvt".,.nl Ac1 01 t 9820' ,..,. AY1II>on Sllety lrod No,w Ab.1te~nl Ac1 011979 A$ us~ I'>er.,n. tr">t II""
-po..oIic: .~ncy spon~ muns. pUbl'" ~ wrt1'l conlrol 01 I !)UbhC'\JS4 I"pon, ri"4 t.rm -pnv"" spoo"$Or" "..,.,1111 I p"""11 Own.,
01 . pvOllC'US4 &1"",n. Ind fM lenn ~. ~ !)UbliC ~ ~ lrod p<1vall Ipcln.so,S.
3. n..u .uurlOUS ~l><llrl 'll<lUlfed 10 e.. submrTtl<l "P-In 01 ri"4 P<otKI Il)pliul>an by ~ ~r wl'tich is Ilolh I ~blic I~ncy InO
. pl&nnl"9 I~ncy 'll<lutStJng turodS 10' "1'9"I~ II"",n SYlttm p~n""'g une.r ri"4 prt)vISJCI1S of the "'"",n .rod A,rw.y
~lmenl.A.l:t oj 1~2
.. Upon acapllnc. olltlt gllnl oHtr by ri"4 sponsor. ~ lSS/JrlrQ1 I,. , .00. po. "~in II'd Il>ecomt pan of the g~nt Ig,"mant
.. Duf"allon and ~plkabil~y.
. "
1. AIrport c.Yllopmenl or Hoi.. l'ro<tIram Imp..".,.ntation Pr.oie~ UnderUiln by I PUblic Agency S90nlOr. n,. larms.
c:onclrt>OnS lrod IUUllnc.. oi II'>e grlnl 19rHm<inl Sl\.l1I "m~ln In tuM tor.:. Ind t"eel t!\roughOVl the uwfujlifl 01 ri"4 flclli~n
de'v.~ or I'QVIP~nt aCI::\Ulrt<!lor In II'PO" d4vtlOQmlnl Of r'lOlS' program im~rT"4nl.ltion proj.ct, 01' t11r~t 1'tl4 I.lHful hi.
01 the p1c,tC1lllms InSI~lIad wlt!\ln IllCllily uroder I nOIH progrlm Impl.",.ntllion pro,~. bul in 1/'Iy ..,enl nollo IICmtwlnty (20)
yotl" from Ihl dllt OIICC.pllnc. 011 grant o"tr 01 F~arl' furodslor ll>t p<o,tct. Howt'tr. tl'le" Shall e.. no limrt CI1ll>t durllion of
the 1'53Urlncl IQllt"lSI excluSIve f1Q~U or t~. 'erms. conditIons. and assurances wIth "sped to r..1 r>t'OQerty .cq'.llr~ wt11\ F~{a'
funds. Furttltrmort. t". dYfilitlon of ttlt C"",I RIl;r'ils ASsuranc. 1t\.I1I ~ a.s lpt'Cl/it'd In m. IS$.lJflne.l .
2. ~ c.YtlOpment or HolM PrQ'Orlm Implamentl1lon PTo~ta UnderUitn by I PTtwt.o 5ponlOr. TI'4 p<tUding par.g,aph
1 aJJQ Ipplles 10 I pnYIII sponsor IIClpl tnll tnl uMfullil1 oj pro,tcl rttms ""I~II~ wltrl,n a faC1llty Of tl'le uMlullilt 01 flcllilies
dev'elope.<j or 'Qulpment ac~ul('d undtr Jr'l Jlrpor1 Cltvllopm,nl Of noli' pro.;ram Impllmlnl1tlon pro,e<=t sh,all t>t t'\O),eSJ thin 10
l'U" trom II>t 0111 olll'>e ICClpllnCI 01 FtdllllllO lor tnt prottct.
3. AJrporl Planning Undlrllkln by I Sponsor. Untl" oml""'" s~lll~ In thl glint Igr~mtn\. only A$.urlne.. 1.2.3,5, a. I J.
1'. lno 30 In s.ctlon C IOPly 10 pllnnl"9 prOllels. TI'>e \arms. corodlllons lrod USUllnCIS 01 the grlnt IgrH".,.nlSt\lll "~In In lull
Iorea and IHeel dunng Iht hll 01 II'>e protlC\.
C. ~ c.rtlfleation. Tnt sponsor ha'lby "","S Ind ctnrl~s, wrtn nnptc1to tn,l glint 1Il~1.
1. 0."...1 Ftdtral Roquillments. It w,lI comply wrlh all IPpliCIOIt F.oellllaws, r'9ullllons. IItcullYe oroors. poliCl". gUlolhnes
and rtQUlflments IS IMy r"~lalo tnl ~1iC1llon, ~tPllnel &nd uSl of F.oe'"llunos 10' tnls p'OjtCllncludlng oul nol IImlttd to Inl
!oIlOwlng:
Ft<HlIl I.lgllllllon
I,
b.
C.
d.
t.
f.
g.
h.
i.
I.
k.
\.
m.
n.
o.
p..
Q. -.
r.
s.
1.
FIOII" AVllllon Act of li5I' ~g U S.C 1J01." soo.
0Ivl,.8Icon ACI - ~O U.S.C. 27a(l). "soo.'
F I<lll I' FI" !.lbor Stlndardl AC\ of 'i31. 2i U.S.C. 201," IIQ.
Hltcn AC1' 5 U S.C. 1501." 110.'
Unllorm RalOCltlon ASSllllnCI Ind RUI PrOPlny ACQUISIIIOn ~OIICilS Act of 1970 . ~2 U 5 C
Nlltonl' HlllorlC PrlSlfvltlon Act 01 I~' SaCllon 106. 1a U.S C HO (II'
ArcnlOloglclI Ind H,stOflC PrlSlfvlllon ACI OlliH. la U S.C ~ai tnrougn 'aiC.'
Flooo OIIlSIIl ProteCllon Act 011i73. StCllon 102111" ~2 U.S.C. ~Ol21'
IItnlbllollllOn ACI of 1973.29 U.S i:: 79-4
C/YIIII,gnts Act 011M4" Tilll VI . ~2 U.S C. 2000d Inrougn d'~.
Av'"tlon Slflly Ino NO," Ablllm,nt Act 01 1979. U U.S.C. 2101, '1110.
AgI OllCflmlnlllon Act 011975. ~2 U.S.C. al01. 'I "0.
ArCntllctulI' 81"'"SAC\ 01Ii6a,'2 U SC. ~151, tl SOO.'
Airpon lnd A"wly Improvamtnl ACl of li12..9 U.S.C. 2201," 110
PowlfPllnt Ino InduSlrl" Fual USt Act of 1971 . 5~tlon .ro . ~2 U 5 C. 8373'
Contllcl WO" ,",ours Ino Slllly Sllnoares ACI' ~O U.S,C. 327. "IIQ ,
COP""nd AnllklckblCk ACI. 11 U.S.C. '74.'
Nlllonll Env"onmlnlll POliCY ACI of liei..2 U.S.C. .321, '1110'
Enolnglllo So.CilS Act of 1973. 16 U.S.C. &61(1). II IIq'
S,ng" AudllAct 01 I~' 31 U.S.C. 7501." 110.'
'.j
'SOl. II "0
~~ l.lw'l OQ 0"10( J.C"OIy 10 pt.IM~ ~otK'IJ.
E~ ero., 12:37<. ~
yo.;.. ~ :;01 C't'Or"1: 0--=7' ilr-3
~I R.<oulltiOn.
L 48 CF/\ Psn21 . Nondlscnmlnltlon in Ftdelllly-,l,uil1ad Pr~,"l'!\l or th4 O'Plrtm.nt 0/ Tllnlp><rt.t,on.
EHletult,on of Titll Viol tl1. Civil ,q'ghu A;:t 0/1164.
... CFl'I PII1 23. PI11ICZ;>lllon 'Jy ),llnorTty !UII.-. Entorp"" In 04~rt".,.nl 01 TllnlPOrtlllon Progrlms.
., CF~ Pin 2S. Uniform F\.loe.atlon 1M R....J Proper1y Ae.t:l..UI~~~I~n.Lot ~ed'(.1 ano F.a.rIUy-AUI.I.d
fl'n>vr 1m S.
21 CFA Plrt 1 . PrlXlduru for Prtd-tLlrminltion of Wl~ RIII$.
2t CFR plrt 3 - CQntracl.Ora 01 S<.lbIContllelOfl on Public Build,ngs 01 Publ,c WO<kl Finan.,." In Wl1ol. or Plrt Oy
L~nl or Gr.ntl from U.S. ,
2t CFR Plrt 5 - LICor Sllnd.,ds ProYilions ApplieaCi, 10 Contrae1s Cowling F'dorllly Financ~ Ind A$''':IO
Cof\lln..rc:tlon.
041 C'R Part 27 . Non-DiscrimInation on It'll SUIS of HlndiClp in Progr~ms and Activiti~ R.c.iving or B.ntldlng
from F-.der.1 Firu.ncl.a1 AUlltlncl,
., CFR Pin 50 - OfficI 01 F~"'"l Contracl Complilnc. Pr~lIms. EquII Employm.nl OpportUMy. alPlrtmlnl
01 L.lbor (FI"d".'lnd Fed.rllJy-~rst.d Connlctlng Requlr,mlnts).
I. U CFA Pin 1SO. A"P>Ort NoiH Compll'b,lity PI.nning.
j, R...rvtd.
om.:. 01 ~1TM<11 lnd ~t Clreular,
L ~7. c.:.t ~ Ao:I>i>Ul>'" 10 Granu lrod Controcu ""th SI~I. Il1d ~I GOYlmrr>enIS.'
b, A.' 02 . Urvfcrm R~,,"'"rr>ents lor .o.u.sunc. to SLlII lrod ~i GoYlmrr>ents:
C. ....121- A.l.Ols 01 Slale ~ l.oeaJ ~ts.
II.
e.
d.
..
f.
II-
h.
OWl Ckcul.rs A.17 and .4.:'02 centlrn requi"mlflll.!Or Itlll Incf lOCI I go....rnm.nta rllCaiving ~t<Hfll .....ilt.ne.. Any
requlfem4nt 'Iv!4"d upon IUt, Ind IOC-Il gc.,..mmtnu by fn... two Clrcullt"S .",11 alia be Ipplie.ablt 10 privatI sponsors
~.,;ng '..0.(11 uallt.nCI und4r I~ Airpor1 and Airw.y Impfo.....m.nt Act 011112. .'
~rlC USurl",," 'lqIJir~ 10 e.. inelue.d In granllgr".".nu Cy ~y oj me aboYI ~W1. r~u~tionJ 0< cirCl.l~n orl in<:Orpo<ll~.
by ~ in the g1ll'll I9r"",l1lt.
2. ~Ibillty lnd Allthorlty of the SponlOr. .
L ~olic All'ncy Spo<'llOr: M has 1f9111Ul1">Onty to Illpiy 10' me gran!, 'and to Iinanea Ind carry out the PfClXlUd prot.ct; tI\.Ill
IlNOlulion, mohon 0< Jim,lar K1Jon ha.s CoHn duly IOoPI~ or pasHd u an offio.ol K1 of the lPlliiant"a ;<>Vlm,"9 body
~ m. /Ihn<;/ 01 II'>e ~"eaIJOn. JnCludl"9 Iii uroderSlirodi"9S lrod UIUranetS alnl&.n-.d lI'4flln, .nd cfule1I"9 Ind
lumenZI"9 Ihe person <<nl,h'd IS IN oMiclal rtpros.n'aIIYI olltll Ippl~n110 1e1ln COIlMC1ion wrItl the ~heaoon Ino 10
~ J.Ud"I aOOlhO".11 lI"IfOfTT'l.ahon &S /TI.Iy be ftqUlfl'd.
b. "nut. SponlO1: /1 hu l&9alluthOntylO Ipply lor m, grlnland 101lnanCI Ind earryou1 II'>e p'09OSId protKlll1d comply ",'Ih .iI
lemna. con<llllons. ~nd usurlnclS 01 m,s grant IgrUmlnl II SI1~iI dOS'9nlll an officill r09'lunl&lI~. and sllail "' WfTtIn<;/ 0""01
and lutl'>o<1ze Ihlt ~n 10 hie ltlJs ~p"eallon. Il'ldudlng Iii underst~rodln<;/S and usurances ~ therein; 10 act In
co.. ><<1>011 Wlm me ~pI~llon; Il1d to pnov.oe SlJCI'llOdll>Ol1l1lnlormlllOn U may e.. r...UII~.
3. S90n1O( Ifund AYlillbility. /1 hIS suffICient fundS IYllllbl. 101 m~1 pcln>an 01 IN ptOleel COilS ",t1lch Ire not to e.. PaJd ~y thl
lJM~ SI~les. II h~s sufflcilnllunos ~YII~ta 10 lSlure oper~oon ~nd m~'nll1lanc. ollllms lunoeo under th. granllgr"m'nl
wtuc::h It Will own or control.
.. Good Titl.. II holds gOOd Itllt. sallsla010rj 10 me s.cret.ry. 10 me I~ndlng 1111 of Ihl II'POn or Sill therlOf. or ""iI g'v, ISSUflnc.
"~fIClOry to I1>t s.crel~ry mil gOOd lille ..,ii e.. lCl:IWId,
Fo< l101S1 program ,mpll",."tltJon prOlfe11 10 be eam~ OuI on In, property 01 tl'>e spOnsor. iI /'\oldS gOOd Itlll SlllsllC:Ory 10 Ihl
s.cfll~ry 10 t!\lf conlOn Of me property upon wruen F~erlllunos ",," e.. upen~ or ",," ;'Y'lSlur~ncllo tho s.cfl,ary Il1al;OOO
l11ta ",,/1 e.. OOI~"'Id,
5. """""'ln9 /\Ig~ts Ind Po....".
... 11 WI/I not taX, or permit Iny 1C1lon wt''hct'l W()uld' oOt:rlrl to Olcrlv, II ot any ot Itll flg"IS It"td POWlfS nl'C.uary 10 D4r1orm 1ny or all
01 I.... I.rms. conO'trons, Ind lllurane.. '" lflI grant ~;r"mant Wlt/'\oul II'>e ..nilln ~prOVII of II'>e s.cflllry. Ino w,It ICI
promplly 10 &<:<lUll.. '"IJngursh or modi"" I"Y OUISI~rodln<;/ "9nls or Clllml 01 n<;jt11 01 Oll1orS wtllell wou/Q 'nt.norl ""to sucn
pen~nc. by Ill. ~sor. Th,S SI1lfl Pc oona In I mAI\Mr ~pllll" 10 ll\t s.cTlt1ry.
b, M ""f1 nol Sill. Ieue. tnc.Jmcl1 or O1I'4"",,U Iranslor or dlsp:l,. ollny pan 01 ItS Irtta or other Int"..~ in the oroOlrty Sl10wn on
Exhlb'IA 10 thiS IPllI~t>Ol1 or. lor 1110<,. pTOgllm "";;lamanll1lon prOfeel, thll pclnlon olll'>e ProQerty upon wtllcn FtdlrlllundS
ha~ t><<n ..~. 10< t!\. OUllt>an 01 t!'\e I'rms, COI'ldII>QnS. 11'10 IQur&neas In me granl IQrHINnl "II/'\oul ~croyal cy In.
S<<rttlry. If Ihl IflltS/or" " fOUnd by the s.crtl~ry 10 e.. tllQlbl. Undel ri"4 "'rpor1and "',..;,~y Improy,m,nl Act 0/ 1 S!2 :0
"s~me 11'>e. OOI'9lllons of Ih, grlO1 '9"em,nl Il1d to hlY' thl powor, IUthonty, lrod Iin~noi~1 rllO<.lrCIS 10 Clrry ou.! 111 'uC.'
Obl~"hons. the s,oons.or SI'lIJllnUr1 m ttl-I etlntflC1 0( ~~nllrlnsl.rnf'l.9 or dISQOSU'I'9 of tn. spor'lOs(s Inllr'$1. ~na m.~e
~ IJpon If'l' IfIMI1,rH. III 01 me f,rms. condlllons. Ind usuranc.. COt'l!..llnl'd In l1'Il, grant I'gfHm.nl
-
,1.4 '''''''1ClOolOQ II..., PI9I' 01 6
c. For rJl row ;>,co"l,.. ,~nl~liOn C'~S .-f\><h lrt 10 e.. u"..d oul ~y anoIN' ..n~ 01 '0:..11 9<'vooomeo.1 ~ Irt 00 ~oo.-.f
owned by I uNI 01 \oc.I1 ..,...,T""'i'I\ Clf:Wf lNf1 tr-. ....... ~. ~ """ ..-- ...., Ir\ .... _,- i MlI'l lMl ~. e..c.o. "
ClTltI"tl<l$e ~if>ed by the ~I"1, N1 ......m.rrt sNlI oOloiIl" ~ go.+..r>ef1l ., .... Io&mI -.ms, co otu'i. rod
~ N111'W'd e.. ~ 10 ~ ~ J( ~ av.ctly 10 the FAA let a gt&rll1O ~ lhIl'OU program m;;le"...nl..lIlOn
".q.et. Thal ...,~I ar>d cN~ thertl0 "....1 be YIIs1~C1cry \0 It'4 s.atu"1 "MIl ta.<1 J11~ 10 .mOf~ ~ ~"""'nl
~ the \oc.I1 go.,..mmerrt ~!hI,. II ~i 'IOI~'~ Mil'!.... ~ oI....agMmV>l.
d. For roisf ~Im tT,y..,nenunCl1 prq.cu \0 be carried oul on privately ~ poopeny, . w enar rTtlll11lQlh"">erJI Wllt1 the
_ 0I1NJ ~ w1\id1 rd...o., p,ovis>ons ~II;.. . .... s.crlt~"1 " ""II like steps 10 onto<ce trI4 '9'~ agll""lhI
P<-9'ITJ owner _or lhI<. i, subatlntslll'C<l-<:om;. ..lnee Wllt1 tl\e lerma al the ""'_,1.
.. W!hI ~ is 1 privall ~ ~ ""lIlIkl slopS ~tis1lC1o"1 10 IN $<<rot.a"1 Ie 1f'ISlJ" trl&t!hl airpon win COl"1In.Je 10 tuncllon
&II publie.uw 1Jrp;:lt1 in &CCOrdince WTt't'o ~S, .J$,.surln<:'S lor tt)I d\,lflt)On 01 ttw$ol USl.J(Irx:.t!
.
1. r 111 arrIf'9O".,.nl IS mlde lor man~gl,..,.nl lrod opelll>an of thl Ilrport by any ...."cy Of penon other trl&n !hi won..,' 0< In
t<T'4)loy" 01 tno 'peln.., r. !hi won"" ""II rtU"'t su11ie1ent "9h1. &!rod lutr>onty 10 "SUfl INt the airpon ....1 e.. O\>Irll~ lrod
rnal'Uln-.d in Iccord~nCl Wllt1 the "'r;x><1 lrod AI""IY Improvtm4nl Ac1 01 , N2, the nlgu~lic:n$ arod tne limns. ~itions anc
-..raroas ., the grant .,..-..ment Ind I/'I.1l1lnsyfl INt Wc:I\ atUflgtment ~ rlClu,," o:mpIi&nea ri"4f.......m.
.. CQnI~CY with L..oc.al Plana. The proje<:1 IS 'lI,onlbly con,;stlnl Wllt1 plans (Illsting 11 the llme 01 Il./l:lmUion 01 Itlli
l;lPIic:.llion) of publiC I~ne~ tn~II'" lulhOru.d by tho Slllaln wl'lIeh the prote<:1IS 'o:..It~ \0 plan fo< the o-velopmenl 01 tl'>e 1111
~ ri"4 &1"",n. For r<liw pn:w;flm implemenl..llion pr~eu, omer lh.II'll&nCl acqu~, 10 e.. ClIm-.d 0U1 on propeny not
owned by the airpon Ind over w1'1leh propeny Inoln" publiC Igol"l!:Y hu I~nd US4 CX)r'lttol or 1lIlI\onty, the ~ wn ~lln !fom
MCh aud'l agency I wnnln decllrltlon tnlt Sl.lchlgency suPQOris tne prot<<t lrod the prqect it rusor.atlty CO<lIlSllm W1\t\ the
89'f'CY'1 pl&nl ~"rdlng !he propeny.
. ..
7. C4nlkMnllon 01 Lo~llntll'lst. U hu glvln 1111 conS/derl\lon to tnl Inllrtsl of communttes '" or nUr ~ the projKI may be
'o:..It~.
.. C4naullltlon .~h U"'I, In maklng.1 d~lslon 10 u~n~kt Iny Ilrpo.n o-velopml;\t ptojec1 under tht A,rport lrod JJrwlY
~nl Ac1 01 1982. It h.ls urodtn..ln rllsonlblt aln~u""tlons Wllh InlC1~ pan... USl<"\l ri"4 ..rportll wN:l'l the prqect II
~. .
bllc Hearings. In prottC1S Involving thlloelllon olin Ilrpon. In II"",n ,unwlY. 0< I m~IOr I1J".,.IY txl.nsion. ~ h.ls IHord~ lI\e
opponunJIy 10' publiC nUfI"9S 10' tho purpose 01 eonSldtflng tht tconomlC, 110<:111, lrod InVllonmenl~ltntCtS of"" II"",n 0' I1J".,.IY
kx.atlon and Its conSIstency Wltl"l1l"l' ,;o~rs and OOI'<;1I.....S 0/ sue" ptlnnlng as h.as t4-tn c:.arn.d out by ~ communIty tt sttlll. """"n
r.quesl~ by I,," 5~1I1I"1, submll I copy ollh' Irln~f1p' 01 SuCh hUflng' \0 II'>e s.<:rtll"1
10. AJr aild Wa.I" QU.llity Sl..Indardl, In protlCts Involving II"",n 1Oc:~lIon. I mljor I1Jn"'ly utln~ion, 0' I1J".,.IY 'o:..Illon ~ w,lI ptovtOt
lor lI\e Gover1>Or of tne SIIIO In w1'1ICh me protKI IS 1oe~1~ 10 e.nlly In wntl"9 10 !he s.cr1t~"1 tnll the pt~C1 w,lI be 'o:..I1~.
dUlQr>td. conStruC1ld. Ind operal~ '0 " 10 eomply WTtn IppliCable '" and watl' qUll1Iy 11..Ind&,da. In any CUI """'ft SlJCh
SlltlOl1dS nlvl nOI Ctln IPproyta Ind w1'1t1'l ~pll~lo a" arod Willi qUlllty stlrodlldS noVI bHn promuiglt~ by I"" AdmlnlSlra.
lOr 01 the EnVllonmenl1l IO'OlectlOn Agtncy, CtndlClbOn snlll e.. Cbtllnl<1 from SUCh AdmlnlstrltOr NoIICI of clnlllQbOn or 'efuyl to
certlly 1/'1.111 e.. p'ovldlO ;."thln S/Ily ~YI a"er t1\I prot<<t Illph~llon hU bHn ree.lv~ by Iht s.c"l..Iry
1 1, Local AppfOyal. In prOllClS Inyolvlng I,," CX)r'lstru<:lIon or txl.nSlOn 01 any runwly II Iny g.".rallvllllon Ilrpon 'o:..I1~ UlnOI I
.". Mpartll"9 !'NO counllU .,lIhln a SI"9" 11I10, ~ h.lS rKllvl<1 ~provll Icr Iht PfotKllrom Iht governing body 01111 vllllges
inc:orpo'"I~ u1>O" II'>e I~.... of mil SI..III wN:l'l art IOe.st~ tnt,,",y wlln,n fivl mllea 01 I,," r>tarlSt bOund&"1 of lhI airport.
12. 1,""lnll o.Yllopment '"--quiaillS. For protlClS w1'1lcn InCluoa t.,mlnll devllopmenl II ~ ~bliC Ii"",n. ~ h.ls, on the ~It 01
Sl.lbmlnll of I"" p'ottCI gr~nt IppllClllon, IlIlnt 1~ltly t<lUlcm.nl r.qU"l<1lo< Ctnrtl~llon of suCh ..'pon u~, secuon 612 01 ml
FtOtI'll AYIIlIon Act 01 19S4 Ind ~II Iht SKuflly eQulpmtnt 't<lwtO Cy rull or ''9U,"llon, Ind hU provided lor ICl:ftS 10 ml
PIsseng" tnpllnlng Ind depllnlng 1"" 01 SlJeI\ .."",n 10 puun'Otrs Inpll11ln'O or cepl~nlng from I"efln Otnef mln I" ~"Ie'
&1rc:1III.
". ~lI11t I)'SLlm. Audll. and JIIIecordkHplng JIII~ul.......,tl.
I. "1/'1.111 k"p III prOiec1lCCO\JnlS lrod raCOldS w1\>en fully dlKIOII tne Imount &!rod dllPOSlllcn by I"" ,ociCtOnt 01"" pfoc:ms cf thl
9"1111, II'>e ICI..II COSI 011,," prOI~lln conneetlon wlln whlcn tht g"nl IS 'Olyen cr US~. lrod tht amount Ind nalull ct tnll porIlcn 01
ltle eCSt 01 t1\I protlC1 SlJppll~ by omer sou'elS. ano suCh omt' hnlnCIIII~ds perMlnl 10 t1\I prq<<I. The lCCOYntS and
r'W'CCrdS In III DlIt:'C1. In accordane. ""Itr'I 1M IC;01.,mllng system IMJ,1 wllllwllt~t. an .MK'tIV' It..ICllt In aeeot"ncl 'MtrI tn.e U S
GeMIII Ac:ounMg O11ICI PU01ICltlon tnUUta QUIO.MIS 1001',nlnCIIII/lC' CompIJlnc, ....udlrs 01 1'. <larllly A$~Wt<l P~'"ml
b. " snlll mlkt Ivlll~blt IC Itl. $<<'tll"1 Ind Iht Comptroller Gtneral cf 111' UruI~ 5lalts. 0< lny 01 their duly aUIMnad
I"IOI'l'Mntlhvts. lor tl"'4 I)uf"POH olllJdlt and uamll'\.ahon, any bOOks. doc:vrnents. p.apers. and fKOflU of If'\t1 rKI~nllr"l'l .r.
~.. 04-r11 to tne grin!. The SKrlllry may f.-QUlre tnalln lQ~fOcnll. IYdlt be ccnd\IC1~ Oy I flCll'llnt. In .ny e.&U: in w1"lle1'l1n
.lCIfOe, tOtn! luOll IS maoe al mt leCounlS 01 I sponlO< 1111\1"9 10 me dllPOSI1>On 01 t1\I proeHds of I granl 0' rll~\I"9 10 Inl
~ n et:n"'<<'= wnr. "O'!'ld' h '7W1 _as ~ Of ~, I J/II~ I.. I ~.-d CDI;Jy 01 S<.>Ch WOol wnr. h ~r c..-~r '"
0/ h l.nl.Id 5 IA Ie! rex _ ltI.ltl 6 /TXl<"I11'<S lc4I.; -. '\j It'>e CleM ol It-. ftac.aJ rut let wr..:n It'>e IU:ll1 W u rr.&o<l.
II, IIIInlmum W~ !\aUs. ." IN! ~. " 011 CXl111'r1C'~ in uce-s.s oj $2,000 /or WQT1t CI1 I1Ty prq<<tS ~ unoer h ~
~~ wI'>tc1'l iI'''o/'rt Iabo'. ~ lst.tbl<Sl'l"'9 minimum r~l" of wa~s.lo.e.. ~Ie"",r>ed by the s.cr.1.a'l' 01 Lobo<..,
~ WT1l1,..,. Olvi.-Blcon Acl, LS &J"""....o.d ('0 U S.C 27~ - ~.~). wtllCt\ contrlO1M shaJJ ~y 10 IluJIed ilfld urukJll.-:l
lalla. and J<.dl me'IIIT'JIT1 m., ltIall be sat..:! ., h ~ /or bods and J/ll1I be IndlJOl<l '" ~~s 01 bI<1s 10' C'le won<.
11. V~ l'roI"'I~. ".!NII in>:/ude. in &11 CCI1lTlO1s lor wor1< CI1lny pro,<<U ~ u,..,., the grant ~rHmenI wtlW::h ~
I&bot', II.ld'\ pt"QV1~lonS IS af' n.c.ss~ry 10 l{'\J.Yr. t/'\It. in tn. .mp~ymenl 01 Labor (lJ.c.pl in '1IOJfrvt, Idmlnlstrltf'l1. II'ld
supe~ ~lOn5). p<Yitr~ stl~1I e.. g....... III Yller&ns al C'le Vietnam.... and dls.oble-d YWllrll1. U dehnl(j In $<<lIon
S I S(C)(l} and (2) olthl Alrpon lrod AJrw.y Improv."..,.,nl Ac1 of 1982 HO'!Wv.r..tnu prellrene. 'h~1I apply only wtl". 111. ,ndJY<lUals
.... 1'o'UIl:>l< and qU~II>ed 10 .,.nonn !he wQn< 10 whil:t\ !he emploY'T,.nl ,.wll.. .
11. Conformity ID F'1lnl 1r>dSp.cltlcatJonl. "will UICI.I1. the prOfIC1 subjlC1lo p(ans, sp<<:lliations. and sct'4dula, ~prov~ by
C'le s.cnory. SudI plln.. opectfi~t>O<\.. and scneduln Sf\all e.. suomr!t~ to C'le s.crll~ry pnot to ~rr,.nt a1 Sltl
prtplfaUon, constru01lOn, 0< other per10~ncl under It\Is grlnl ~re.m.nl. and. upon IP9novll by lhe s.c.ltlry. &hIli be
. oc:orpo.lta<l into !hIS grlnllgrHment. Any mod~I>On.IO the IWrovld p(ans. ~I>Ons, and sd>..:Iu'-. Sf\~1I llso e.. SUlljIC1
so ,""""aJ by ltle s.crelAry ~nd Incorporltlon Into the grlnt Igr..rr,.nt.
17. ~ 1n1P9C1lon Ir>d Approyel. "will I)<1OYlOI Ind malnlAin oornpelenl t<<hnicalaupelYi$ion II the COf1S1f\JC1iC11 litl
~ the P'0ie<:110 IUure mal t!>I wQr1< conlorms WTtt\ t!>I plans. l;)IC1~tions, lrod ~ule5 IWroY~ by C'le s.erwl.lry lor
\tie pl"Of<<1. " sIl~1I sUbjlC1.lh. construction wer1< CI1 lI1y ptOi~ comainl(j in an IP\)I'OYe<l ptot<<1 appIiC.Ilion to ~ and
tIPl>'OYII by t1\a Secrellry Ind suCh worle sIlllI Clln Iccord~nce with r'9uIIUCI1S Ind prOCe<lur.. ptesenbe<l by the :;..:rotlry SudI
regulatlOl'1S and. procadures snlll r.qu"1 suel\ cosi Ind progress "pelnl"9 by t1\e sponsor 0< lpoI1aC1s of such PTOiICt u lhe
s.cr.lAry shill deem nacI"lry. .
11. Plannl~ Pro~tl. In C~"Y'''9 OYI pllnnlng ptOj~IS:
a. " .,.;H ellC\lla IN prcjlC1 in. IeCOr~nc. With the Ipprov~ ptogram .".rTlliv. conlAjr>ed in the P1Ol1Ct IWliC.Ihon 0< willi
rrodllic.a1JOf"\S 'lmlllrly IpprC.....C1
~. "...Ii'furnish the Secretlry Wlm Such peCiodlC repelns IS rl1:lurred pen~lnl"9 to tl'>e pi~nnl"9 P<OfIO ~nd pl~nnl"9 wor1< ~CTrYIIIIS,
C. "MU incJuo. In aU puOhs~d mil'flll pr.p.ared In conn'Kt.on wllh tM pl.nnu''9 prOlKt I noliGa U'\at tt'4 ~1'n..1 w&,s pr.p.art-d
under I grlnl provldeo Oy the Unilld SI~le.
d. "....11 mike SUCh mlllrr~1 ~Vlli~ble for Ulmlnll,on oy the publre, Ind Igr"s Ihll1>O mllerrll prepared wrtt! furodS une.r this
prOfIC1 sIllil e.. suOlect 10 copyrrgnlln the U~lIed 511115 or any other country.
e. "....11 ~ the Secr.llry unrestn01~ lutnorlly 10 publrsll. dISCION. cllstnbule. and ot!'4f'WIN UN Iny 01 the mate nil ptlparld In
conne<:1lOn With IhlS granl.
I. II ....11 granllhl S~rellry lhe rrghlto diUQproyeltle sponsors employment of so.<:rlie consultants ~nd!helr S/JbeonlrlCt0l'110 dO
III or Iny pin 01 IhlS pro/eel ilS w.1I ill Itle rr'OhtlO d,gpprove the prOpOSed SCOpe Ind cost Of proleUlonl1 serviCIS.
g. "Will granl the Stcrel~ry Ihe nghl 10 diU,pprOYllhe UN 01 me SpOnson omplOy"S 10 do III or Iny p~n 01 lhe prOie<:1.
h. "urodmtlr'ods Ind Igrlft Itlat tne Sectetary.. ~II 01 thIS prOie<:1 grlnl or the s.erellry.s IPprOYli ot Iny pi InnIng mll.rrll
~IOPId U pin 01 ml5 gran I does not constllula or Imply Iny usurancl or commltrr,.nl on the p~n ollh. s.erollry 10 acproye
II1Y pending Or fUlure applrcltlOn for I Flderal Ilrpon grlnt
11. Operstlon and Mllntltllnce.
~. It WIll sUll.lCly operlle ~rod mllnllln Ih. Ilrpon Ind III f~CIIII'" thereon Of COnnlC1ld Iharew'IM. WIth due r'9lrd 10 Cllm~llc Ind
flood Co<'dll>Ons. Thellrwn Ind 1IIIICilllllS whiCh Ire nec15Ury 10 sarvelhe uronlulrCl1 users Of thelJrpon. Othtr thin IICllltlU
Ow~ or controlled Oy!l'll Unlleo Sllll.. 1"111 oe OOtrll.cllt all tlm.. In II'" and HNIC.ICI, eonoluon and In IccorcanCI ...,lIn
the minimum SlAn~rdS U mlY O' r.quII~ or prescn!ad by IPpllCIOIe Flderll, SI~lIlnd 1000llgencIIs for m~lnl.nlnCI 1M
~rlllOn. tt WIll not c.a!-lM Of permll any activity or lC'tlon l,.,.rl'Ol"l .tllen WO\J~ rn1.r"f"1 wlln ItS u.s.e lor Alrpon purpos.s
In lunheranea Of IhlS US<./rlne., t1\e soonsor Will ~ve m IHIC1 II III limes IrTlngemants lor _
(1) Ooerltl"9 the alrpon.s uron~uIJC~IIICllrllll whanover r.qWId.
(2) PromPlly mlrklng Ind IrgMtlng MiIllrds roSl.lltlng Irom IrrpOn conditIOnS, 1n>:IUd'''9 'ampOrary corodltlons. II1d
(3) Promptly nOlltylng Ilrmln ot ilny condlhon IHrchng uron~ullc~1 uW 01 Ihl Ilrpon.
Notlll"9 COf1l1inl<1l>erem stull e.. r:onSlr\Je<lIO rl(lWI fhll the "'rpon e.. oo.<lted 10< ..ron~utlC~1 use dunng tlmporlry perrOd.
- anow. IIood or otl\ef CllmahC concllllons mlerler. ....IM SI.ld1 ~1I>On and maml"'anCI. Funhef. I'iCI",ng her'ln S!\~" 01
~ U ,.qUln"9 Ihe m~tnl.nanc., '1P1Jr. rnlorltlOn. 0( rlPlae_1 of any SlT\JClure 0< flQlrty whiCh IS S/JbSl~n\ll"y
dama9~ or d.stroyed due 10 In 101 01 Ood 0' 01n.. COrodillon or ellcumsllnc. e..yond thl conf'OI of tho .~nl0r
.....1 ~__ tt___,fV'<.>.
b. "~~Iy ~ril1 and rN>f1t61f1 1'0<04 pnogrim ~I"'" ~ IT\.Ii II ~ 0< conlr~ Upel~ ~ FtOeflJ tunos /'~'"
bMnuptndtd
"0. Haurll !lemavllll"d ~Ion. ~... ~u&WIy del' end ~ ~ MM.I ~ 10 ~ Iinpot1 by ~, ~.."".
roloeItl"9, IN""I"9, Ot ir;/t'~n<;/ (j( alhor"WlS4 mrtJgllJ.... UISllng &1rpot1 I\u.on:lS Ind by pt"""'b1"oO :r.e HUbllsnmenl 0< C"UI"", at
!vt\n Il1port h&Z1~.
21. ~ ul'd UN. K "'" lM.I ~!a 1Ctoon. ~ ~ acloptlOn o1l~ 1.1....,. 10 the Ult<"J1 r..~~. 10 rUtTlO1 m.
~ 01 iJI'Id ldjaconllO 0(" ~ ImtT'4Ql.l1 YlOMy olltlt 1Ir;x><11O II;lIY1\l4S &nd PUr;lO$t5 Cl:lmpI~co. ,..,It\ ~ IIrpoon ~rltJon.s,
~"'illandi"9 Ind ~klOM OllllCflh ]n IOdllion, rl the ~" 10< ""'H pnogrlm ""P1e",.nl~lion. rl wllIl'lOl e.uSl 0' pemnrl.ny
el'\ange '" I&nd UN, wrthln J\J lu~SdIC1""'. ltltl ...." 'ldlJCa fM ClO<T1PI~blhty, .""., ~ to rr.e lirpon, 01 ~ ro04 comp.r~o.lrry
P<"09r&m rNUlJr.. upo.n which FIde'"] tvnds NV' e..n u~
22. E CQuQml( Hond f$erlm iN t10~.
I. K ",U INkl J\J Ilrpoon Iv."~ora .." In .inponlor "",bl", U04 on lall lrod rlU<lN~ lonno .nd WTlI'<>ul Ur'ljuSI diwl"""ll>an to III
~, lr.lnd.I. Ind ~UIS 01 ..ron.ul~/ ......
b. .In arry ag_menl. contIlC/. I..... oro~r "'......ment une.r whictll "'ilh1 0< priY1~ II m. Ilrpon IS grwnl~ 10 any pel"3On. hrm.
Of OO<1>O<lli(ln 10 r:ondu<:1 or ~~ ,n any "'roNuliuII01lYJty lor turT\lSt\ing HT'<lCeS 10 the pvbiic .t m. Ilrpon. ~ spo<1$O' will
~ &nd Il'Ifo<u ~lons r.qulnng I1lI contrlO1or _
(1l 10 ~ 501jd II"""IS on . f.ir, .qual, &nd not ~Ultly dr.s.:nmu'\ltof)' baW Ie all ~ ll'MIrool, and
(:I) 10 d'w~ I~II. r..son~b]'. .nd not ur'ljullly discnm"'~ICf)' pt~ 10< tlc:Il unn Of 1It'Vie1. pnov;dld.lt\~1 tr'4 conlt.01or may III
WlOwId 10 m.k. rU.>onIll" lrod nondISCTlm'''''IOf)' daco<JnlS. roo'llS, 0< _ sunllar types 01 pno:a r~ 10 volume
putd'laStrs.
Co Each liz~'b~..d operaror II In\, Ilrpon owned by tn. SpotUOf sh.1I1l1 wbjlCllo ri"4 "'me ratlS. IMI. nln~]s. arod O1/wr cIIIngas
....... unrlormry IPp/I~O]t 10 III Olhlr tiz~'bU~ Operltors ""kl"9 the 501",. 0< lI'T\l~r uus of Sl./dIII1j)On and u1JiLzing m.
Ioa.t'ne Of JlmIJ" laclltll.S
d, !ad> ait e.mar USI"9 lucn Ilrpon Sl\.l1I1\'vl m. "9hlIO 1It'Vie1 ILWII or to .... .ny r.z~.basId ~,.lor mal ia .uthoriz~ 0<
pelTMtld by th. IIrpon 10 sa"'. Iny "' ~rnar .1 sucn I'rpon-.
~. Eaen Ilf ~rrrtr \,I5t~ 5ue" 'Irpen {wh'f"" IS . lenan!. nont.n,nl, 0( subt,nanl Ollnothl, Itf carrar t'N.n1) ...n.1I btt s.vbjK1 to
IUC" nondls.Gflmlnltory and 5Y05t.a/"ltJ~/ly complraOJ. rul.s. r'gY]l.lIons. condItIons. '11'5, 1M'. r.n!t'!.,and other eh&rg.s u .r,
appllClbleto III Sucrl air eam,rs w''''nen mIke $Imll., us. ot !ve" Ilrport Ind wtllch \JtlliZI Slmlla' lacIlItles. svbj.C110 ,."sonabr,
da.aaI1allOns SUCI\ IS l.n.nIS or I'lOnlln~nIS. lrod COmbln-.d puun9" arod oargo IhghlS 0( .11 ~rgo fI>grils Classlh~hon 0<
ll.ltus IS I,nanl sn~1I n011ll unrlUonlb/y wlIM'1d by any "rpol1 ptOvJdId ~n," ~rr..r UlUmea OOI'9l\!Ol1l SUbS~nlllfly Jltf111~r
10 ttlOM IIrtlay Imposta on Iln~nl ." ~mt". .
1. M willl'lOllUrCIU or grlnt Iny flgl\t or 1)nY1~ whICh OI)t1'.tlS 10 provlnt ~ny pel"3On. lirm, or COfpelrallon 0I)t1'1t1"9 IIIcrllt on Ihl
'It)lOn from perlormlng .ny """CII on III own .,rcr.n "'lh J\J own omplOy"S (Including. but n>:1 Ilmilld 10 mllnllnanea. rtpa",
and lva"ng) lM.III m~y CI\OO.. 10 perform.
g. In the tyll'lllh~llhl soon50r 11,,'1 ""CIltl any 01 m. r>ghtl'rod PTlvlilglI "I."ea to In II\IS auurancI. II'>e "'''''''" InvOlvld Will
be prOvided on tn, $Imt COMOltlons I' WOUk2 &p9ty IQ t~ hJmlsnln~ ot SIJC" servas oy conHIC1ors or ccnc.'U..lonllf" 011'"
aoonloOt ~r I"'S' prOVlllOnS
h. The ~r m.y Imlll/ln Such la". .qUII. and I'lOt unlultly dilcnmln.lOry condillons to III m'l by III usars of I11.lrrpol1 IS m~y
be """''''''f)' lor lTlI sal. ana .HICllnl opernon of IN IIrpon.
i. The ~r m~y prOhlbrl or limlllny grvll'l type. klrod, or Olus of _onlutl~1 UII or I". IIIpell1 II such I0110n IS necllsary lor tl\,
"f. opeflllOn 01 ,..,. IIrpol1 cr """''''''f)' to If"" lTlI CiY1] 'YI~lIan ~I 01 ll'MI PUbilC.
%:l. EJcll.IaIw "l9hll. I] ",II permit no Uc;!UIIY' "9hl lor ri"4 ult 01 tn, llroo<l by any Plr-tQns provldln9, or Inllrodln9 10 provJ(lI.
Hror\lullCll II"',CIS 10 11\. puOhC ~or PUrpoll1 of lI\ll para9raph, me p'OVldln9 01 llMeIS .t In I~pon by I Slngl' hZId'bu'd
opefllor Sl\.l1I nOI III ecnstru~ IS In tlClusrv- nMI rl bOm 01 m. 10/lOwIng 1llQ1y: (11 II WOIJId e.. unrtlsonably costly,
buroensome. Of Imptle1l:. . me" Ihln onl hz. .~ OQcral.. 10 orOYla, sucn 5'''''''IS, Ind (2) II allOwl"9 moll I11&Jn cr.a
hZ~'IlIMd ooerator 10 r ..,. 1uet1 1I"'",os .. I r.qw. me rl<lu01iOl'1 cl L ...1 IUI~ pUTSu.nt 10 an Ulltlng agr"manl
l:>ef. Uln 14,;d'\ &.Ingl. fi.lc... .. ...a-d 0Qtf110r Ind 5.,.... jUl)O".
IUl1IItr ~r"s 111'111...,11 nol. I1lh" d"ffily or rrod"ffily. iran! Of permltlny pelsen. "rm or Corporallon rnl ..cIUJiVI ngnlII Il\t
IHpon. 0< Illni Otl'ler "rpoon n>:w ownld or ~Irollld Oy 11,10 CQnduC1lny llroNullCIII01lvlllts. Including. bul nOlllmllld 10 Ch.ntr
t!w;hts, pdQt Ira","'9, ,'rct.h rll'll~1 &!rod S>g1\l,"lng, IITI,] pt\Ol09rlP~Y. crOll dulb"9, IIN] 1<1v.ni"n9 lrod SUl'>1YI"9, III CIII,.,
ooe-rltJonl. 1~ln 1.1'" and Mt'V~.s, ...'" Of 'V1.alJon ~If~\,lm ptoauctl wnetnel or nee conducted in conlvncnon Wltrl etn"
H~~IIIC1IVlly. r~II and mllnt'tl.IIOU oJllrctlK. Wit Of IIrc:r.h panl. and Illy Oltll1 ICUY1I11S whICh bt<:~uII 01 th," dlltCI
rNllOt\SI1rp 10 11\. Ol)t"liOl'l oIlrrorlll Cln e.. ''9ardl<l IS In HrCl1lul",~] 1IC1Ml'y, &nd mal rl ....11 IIrrT11nlll any tlCfUSIV' n9nllo
~,\ T__ ..__ ........
cot'ldud an HronaU1lCal 1C'~Y ."'OW e:<Jstl~ al sucn in""",n ~Io<. \I'~ grlnl 01 Iny u.w~1'O! ....-.der :N AJi?O'1 V'.d I-,ro"
mp<~ ,A.c1 oi 1982.
'. F.. In>d ~ tal S tru<: tu", "'>W\lI ~ a 1M &rid r tnUl =1 COt'tWl.nt Wl1t1 As.sur If'C:I z:z &rid 2.:J. 10( the I u::1rtl15 1M
.~ -.... ~ \1'>4 I/f?O<1 UM'l w!\d1..,1I ~ko \1'>4 ilrpot1 IS "II.",,~~ .. pelu.!>l4.s'lOor Iho OfcumslArocos I"'II"'}
1llN1 ~w II1pon. ~ ll'ItO ac=.Jn1 WCflIIClO11 IS Itle volume of vlHic and eox.omy oj ~, ~ p,on 01 tr'>t F.o.,.1
&tWo of 111 airpo.n OO'rtloplT>enl, IIrpot1 pWl1\l"9 or nocu pro;rlm ImplomenlalJOn P1OIe<:1 tor wt1>Ctl1 ~ "~de urode' tr'>t AJrpcn
InCI ~y mprovlmentAd 011982, 1l"4 F.oeral Mpor1Ac1 01' Itle "'rporIln::l AJrwry Dt-v9~1 Ad 0/1970 INII to<! ~ In
ll'>e ~ ba54 ., e:s~iS/1"", ,",. ~I". &rid cN~ lor UM" oi It\.Il I/rpcn
25. Alrpoc1~. n t1\O IIr;:on" unOOr,..,. conlrol 01 I PUbliC Ig.ncy, III rlYln~ ~,...rllld by 1T'4 Upo.r1..,1I be'~ ~y rllor
the ~~t 0( operllJnog COS1.5 olt~. Ilrpcn, ri"4 \O:.I11Jrpon lySllm, or o~, ic>Q111J:11Ju., which 11. owr4d 01' Qp>efT!!d by It'ro OWT'ff
0< Ol'>e'lIex of ltlo 3I"",n Ind dllOC1ly rolll!d 10 1M I01uol l"nsiXl~~lon 01 pu~" or propony PrOV>6ed. """'ev.r. It\.Il "
~1"\13 01 u.sUr.lnces tn o.bt otll19ilJons pr'vlOUSly l.$sued by me own.r 0( OC4fltO{ of ltl't &n'POrt. 0/ ~ In QO\'lmlnQ
SUM", controIlin9 tho owner ex 0901110(' linancln<;/, prOV>oa lor tr">t u04 01 ~ ,.....,,"". ~om ~ny 01 the alrpo.r1 OWr>Or 0< O9O"lor S
lao~, rodudl"9 11"\. "rpcn. 10 suooon nol only II'>e IIroon but ~I", tho ,'"",n ""',..., 0( O9OrIlO(S QeOCIII deel OClI'9ollJOf\5 or oth.r
taeUil>es, theI1 Il'\ls IJlT\I~Don on the use 01 III rovonu.. g'''''''I~ by ll'>e &lrpo.r1 sl\aJl nol apply.
2t. "-~ and lnap.<:tJOM. "will wemlllo th4 s.cllllry sud1lnnUII or '~Ial ~I lrod 0l'>e'1I6o<u "fI)OrtS IS th4 SeerOl~ry
may ru~t>y roq"".I. For 3I"",n d.volopmenl pro,OC1S. rt will ~I", ~ko ri"4 &lrpcn &rid oJ ai'POn reeo<dl Ind documentJ
lIfecting the al"",n. includln<;/ OH<Is. lea".. O9OrlII011 lrod U04 'gr"menIS, regulatiCl1s .nd octler inaln.""."I., aYIJI~ lor
~n by any duly ~\Jttlonz~ 19inl 01 II'>e s.crOllry upon r"~~lo r.q"".1. For r<liw p<1)grvn im9IementallOn projecl$. rl ""n
aI$O maJ<. rlC<l,aS Ind ooeumantJ rwl~llng to fM P1Ole<:10nd c:onllnul<1 oompliana Wlt!1 ~ I.rms, ccndrtJons. &rid usuranc.. of ml
Il'anl "O'Hmem IncJual"9 dHdS. Ie...,. IgrHmerils. regullhons. lrod otl'>er Instruments, Irti~~ lor f'SI)eC1JOn by any duly
1IUtI'oon.t~ .gent ol1/1e SKfll~ry Upeln iluon~b" 'eQUI51.
V. U.. 01 ~t AI=ort, """II m.kl IVIII~ble III of l!\a Ilolol..s of thl ~1'POn OOY9!oped ""th F_ril fina__II"'I.!I~ &rid
all thot-l U$.l~ fOf landlng.111d tlkeot'f 01 Ilfcratt 10 th. Unlleo Slll.S for US'. Oy Go~mrT"4nt IlfcraJt in c:ommo.n WIth ott\er Im:ra" It
alt t.rmes wrthovt ct\..lf9'. ue.pl. If me us. by Government .1lfcr..tt 1$ subsiinhal. cn.r~ /'T\Iy be mad. 'Of . r'JiSOr'laO~ shire.
~IIO such uso. lor 1110 cost 01 operali"9 Ind mllnl"nlng Ihe -,"1101015 used. Unless ome....... "'''rmln-.d by ri"4 s.crli.ry,
0( Olt\erwise ag'~d to by the sp>ansor 1M the uSing ~g.ncy. SUbSI'~Ii~1 USI olin lI'POn by govlmmenl ~ralrt w1I' e.. consodet~ 10
uS1 wtIen optrallons of 5uCl"lIIfcr3tt Jf' In ':lCI5S of those wnrct'!. In m. opInion of tM SKr'l.ary, WOU1d unduty ll'T1ltf1t,. wllh use of
..".. L&ndH"'.g afUS by otl"ler lult'lOrlZI'd IlferaH. 0( c:Iunng tiny Cllendl' month thJit _
I. Fiv. (5) or more govemmlnl alfcriltt are r~u!ar!y based at lhe alfport or on I.lnd adJac.nl [h,,,to; or
b. The tot~1 nume..r of movemlnlS (counlin9 UCh Ilndlnq U I movemonl) 01 9C've<nmanl lI1crlN I' 300 0< ""'", Of me gross
aa:umullllvl WI/9111 of govlmmenl lI1croN uSing th. lJ'POn (11'>e 101~1 movemonl' 01 gove1M1ef1t 1Jn:tlrt mulllpi..., by grou
.....h1.5 of Sl.lCl1 IJrcrl"J IS In uc.ss of Iovo mllloon pelund..
21. Und lor ~tdefll Faciliti... It wllllumlSh ""thouI eostto t~ F~er~1 Govemmenl for uso In connec1iOn with Iny &lr VIHle control or
a/f naVl9lhon actlvlll'S. or wllm.r.r.portlng and communahon IctlvIll'S rttaltd 10 air lrlt11c contrct. any .rlU of land or wltlT, or
ISIIII Il10'tln. or ngl1lln bUilding. 011111 SpelnlOr IS th. ~rltlry conSiders neclssary or dlSlI~lIlor conSlrucllOn. operltlon. Ina
maml.nlnc'll F.d.ral tx~n50 of SP~c. or laclltllU lor suell Durp>asu Sucn 111 IS or Iny p>anlon thOleof Will e.. m'dl IvllllblllS
prov~ Met'tn WIU"\ln lour montns ~1tlr reeatpt of ~ wntten reQu.st from IMt S1t<:rtlJI)'
29. Alrpon Loyoul PI.n. iI wliI'HP UP 10 dill 1t.1I I,mu In Ilrpcn I~youl Plln of Ihl 1I100n ,l1Owlnql 1) Ilourodar". Of Ih. IIrpcM 100
III proOOS-l'd IOdltrons 11"Ier.to. '09"1"1.r Wltn tJ"l1 bO\Jndlf.e. ot all oHsrt. arelS own.-d or ccmrollltd Oy IN s.pons.o, lor alf~X'"
pu"",SIS Ind propos..a addlloons l~ff'lo; 12111'>e toc~lIon Ind n.lu1l 01 all ulslInq 1110 prOpelsed ~Irpon flcllilles 1110 SIru01U1lS
ISud1 IS n.mwlYs, IUlw,yS. .p'ons. IIrmln.1 bUildings. hlnql11 Ind rOldSI. lneludlnq III proDOsed ortans.ons arod r~u01l0nS of
.xlstlng Ilrpor11IClhll.5, and (31 me k)uhon of IU 'Jlltlng Ind proQOSed nonavlo1tlon a"13 Ina of aU.Jlstlng lmprovem."tJ t1"l'feon
SuCh al'POn lIyoul pl~n Ind ucn .mlndment, 1IVlSlOn, or modlloc~1I0n Il1ereof. SI1~1I e.. SUOiOC1l0 Ih. .pgnoVll of the ~1I1'ry
W'M1Cn IOCfOVII ,nlll C>e hld.ne~ Oy tn, sl~nlfu" 01 . duly lulnonzl'd r,gr...ntlhv. 01 T1'\. Secrtllry Ot'lIM face of In. Ilrpcn
I~YOlJt plal1. The spon",r will nOI ~.. or permn .ny Ch.ngos or Iiltrlllons In th. "'POn or In Iny ollIS laolllles otl'>er t~ln In
conlormlty Wl1t1 the &lrpoM ilyoul pl~n U SO ~Drovld by tho ~1I11ry If wc~ ch."9U or liI.rlHons m'9l11Idy.rs&jy aNtct th4
Ullty, Ulllity, Of lffic!et1cy ollhl Ilrpcn.
:)0. CIYII ~19htl. ~ ""II comply ..,th sucn rule. IS "" D,omul9.led 10 'UU1l11111 no o&r$On snlll 011 1110 9rouna. 01 'IC.. crMd. oolor.
"111Qnll orr91n, WI, 19'. or 1"IanCllcaC O' UCh..ld'(J from ClnlClPllln91n .ny IctJv.ty c.of"lOuC:lto wrD'l Of oe~frtlnq Irem luf"ldS rec'lv.d
)m IIlIS grin\. ThiS I.lsuranc. 001'91111 th. s.ponsor 10' Ih. caned dunnq wniC~ F~trlllJnll1Cl~II.lSist~nc. IS IIllna.d 101M
ptogram, tlCI'p! whir, In, Ftd,raJ hnanclll ,JiUISU,nC'15 to prOVKlt. or Is,ln In.lorm Of ~rs.oMII pro~rty or r,.1 pfo~rty or rMl,r,,,
~f'1(l 01 SlrUt!urts or rmpro....m.nts tnerl'Q.n, rn wl"ucn c..aH I~ ISI1"Hlne. OCh9J.1IS In. s.ponSOl O(.any transllft_lor ttl. Jon~,r 01
the 1c:1Qw'n<;/ penOCls. (') l!\a penOCl dUlin<;/ wt1iC1\ ,..,. ptopeny IS us&<! lor I purpo.. lor wnlCh F_rallinancill UIIst.nCt "
Uleno.d, 0< 10< .nOll'>er purpoW InVOlVln<;/ m. prOYISlQn of IImlllr ..rv.e1S or benel~s or (2) ml penOCl dun"9 wI1IC~ II'>e SiXln,or
'"I~ln. OWTltrlhlO 01 pel'UUIOn of ri"4 proptny
STANDARD DOT TITLE VI ASSURANCES
......
The City of Paris ,. '~.;.: .:., (hereinsfter referred to ,as the Sponsor)
hereby agrees that as a condition to receiving Fedara1 financial assistance from the
Department of Transportation (DOT), it will comply with Title .VI of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.).and all requirements imposed by 49 CFR Part 21, _
Nondiscriminstion in Federslly Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation
Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereinsfter referred to as the
"RegUlations") to the end tha.t no person in the United States shsll, on the ground of
race, color, or nitional origin, be excluded from psrticipation in, be denied the benefits
of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which
the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and will immediately take any messures
necessary to effectuate this sgreement. Without limiting the above general assurance I the
sponsor agrees concerning this grant that:
.'
1. Each "program" and "facility" (as defined in Sections 21.23(e) and 21.23(b)) will be
conducted or opersted in compliance with all requirements of the Regu1stions.
"
, .
..
2. It will insert the clauses or:Attachmeni; 1 of this assurance in every contn.ct su.bject
tc the Act.and the Regu1stions.
3. Where Federal financial assistance is received to construct a facility, or part of a
facility I th~ assurance shall extend to the entil;'.e .facility and facilities operated in
connection therewith.
4. Where Federal ~inancia1 assistance is in the form or for the acquisition of real
property or an interest in real property, the assurance shsl1 extend to rights to space
on, over, or under such property.
5. It will include the appropriate clauses .set forth in Attachment 2 of this assurance,
as a covenant running with the land, .in any future deeds, lesses, permits, licenses I and
similsr agreements entered into by the sponsor with other parties:
(a) for the subsequent transfer of real property scquired or improved with Federsl
financial assistance under this Project; snd
(b) for the construction or use of or access to spsce on, over, or under real proparty
acquired or improved with Feders1 financis1 assistance under this Project.
6. This sssurance obligates the Sponsor for the period during which Feders1 financisl
'~ssistance is extended to the progra"'l except where the Federal finsncial assistance is to
provide, or is in the form of personal Property or real property or interest therein or
structures or improvements thereonl in which CSse the sssurance obliga tes the sponsor 0:-
any transferee for the longer or the fOllOWing periods.
(a) tha period during which the p~oparty is used f~r a purpose for which Federal
finsncia1 assistance is extended I or for another purpose inVOlving the provision of
simi1sr services Or benefits, or
(b) the
prope.::ty.
period during which the sponsor retains owne:-ship or possession of the
.,-
-1-
7. It will provida'for such methods of administration for the program as are found by ti
Secretary of Tr~nsportation or the.official to whom he delegates specific authority to
give reasonable guarantee that it, other sponsors, subgrantees, contractors,
subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest, .and other participants or Federal
',_. financial assistance under such program will comply with all reCJ.uirements imposed or
pursuant to the Act; the Regulations, and this assurance.
8. It agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regarc
to any matter arising under the Act, .the Ragulations, and this assurance.
THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose .of obtaining Federal
financial assistance for this Project and is binding on its contractors, the sponsor,
subcontractors,.. transferees, successors in interest and other participants in the
Project. The person or persons whose signatures appear below are authorized to sign this
assurance on behalf of the Sponsor.
04-10-89
DATED
. ,
.-
The City of Paris. .
(Sponsor)
By
(Signatura of Authorized Official)
,
Er.i c.. S., Cl i fford, ~ayor
-2-
CONTRACTOR CONTRACTUAL REQU__..<:!1EllTS
ATTACIlMEllT 1
During the performance of this contr'ict, the contr'ictor, for itself, its assignees and
successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contr'ictor") agrees as follows:
1. Compliance with Regulations. Thecontr'ictor shall comply with the Regulations
relative to nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the Department of
Transporta tion (hereinafter 1 II DOT II ) Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, .3.8
they may be amended from time to time (herein'ifter referred to as the Regulations), which
are herein incorporated by reference and.made a part of this contract.
2. Nondiscrimination. The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it durin,
the contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in
the S8 lee tion and retention of subcontractors; including procurements of ma terials and
leases of equipment. The contractor shall not participate either directly or indirectly
in the discrimination prohibited by section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment
practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations.
3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment
In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the contractor
,
for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials or
leases of equipment, each pote~tia1 subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the
contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the Regulations
relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.
4. Information and Reports. The contractor shall provide all information and report:
required by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto and shall permit access
to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may
be determined by the Sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to be pertinent
to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders, and instructions. Where any
inform'ition required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails
or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to the sponsor or
the FAA, as appropriate I and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the
information.
5. Sanctions for Noncompliance. In the event of the contractorls noncompliance with
the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the sponsor shall impose such contract
sanctions as it or the FAA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
a. Withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until tho
contr~ctor complies, and/or
b. Cancellation, termination I or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part.
6. Incorpora tion of Provisions. The con trec tor shod 1 include the provisions of
paragraphs 1 through 5 in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and
leases of equipment, unless exempt by the. Regulations or directives issued pu~su~~t
the t"~to. The cont!:'3.ctor sh3.11 t3.ke such sction with respect to soy sub con tr::ic t or
procure;ne:Jt as the sponsor or the FAA ;!BY direct as a means of enforcing .such provisioCl'
including s~nctions for noncompliance. Provided, how~ver, thst in the event a contr~~t
becomes involved in, a:: is threataned with, litig3.tLon with a subcontractoc or suppli-=::, is
a result of such direction, the contr3.cto"C' may r3quest the sponsor to enter into Such
li tig3. tion to .?rotet::t the .interests of the spons.:>:' 9.01, in addition, the cont!:".'3.":: tor ::l:J.j'
request the United States to enter into sU0h litig3.tion to protect the inteC'-3sts of .~he
Uni tad States.
-3-
CLAUSES FOR DEEDS, LICENSES, LEASES, PERlUTS OR SIMILAR INSTRUMENTS
ATTACHMENT 2
The following clauses shall be included in deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar
instruments entered into by the spcnsor pursuant to the provisions of Assurances 5(a) and
5(b) .
1. The (grantee, licensee, lessee, permitee, etc., as appropriate) for himself, his
heirs, person~l representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as ~ part of the
consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree (in the case of deeds and leases add
"as a covenant running with the land") that in the event facilities are constructed,
.maintained, or otherwise operated on the said property described in this (deed, license,
lease, permit, etc.) for a purpose for which a DOT program or ~ctivity is extended or for
another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the (grantee,
licensee, 1easee, permitee, etc.) shall maintain and operate such facilities and services
in compliance with all other requirements imposed pursuant to 49 CFR Part 21,
Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation, and
as said Regulations may be amended.
, 2. .The (grantee, licensee, lessee, permitee, etc., as appropriate) for himself, his
personal representatives, sucessors in interest, a~d assigns, as s part of the
consideration hereo'f, does hereby covenant and..agree (in the case of deeds and leases add
"as a covenant running with the land") that: (1) no person on the grounds of race, color,
or national origin sh~ll be excluded from -participation in, denied the benefits of, or be
otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities, (2) that in the
construction of any improvements on, over, or under such land and the furnishing of
services thereon, no person on the grounds of race, colorl or national origin shall be
excluded from particip~tion in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to
discrimination, 0) that the (grantee, licensee, lessee, permitee, etc.) shall use the
premises in compliance with ell other requirements imposed by .or pursuant to 49 CFR Part
21, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation,
and as said Regulations may be amended.
-4-
STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION
\-::-
There has been no opposition received by the City of Paris in regard to
the proposed plan described herein.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCEDURE STATEMENT
The procedures outlined in Executive Order 12372 have been followed. The
correspondence requesting review by interested agencies is attached. No com-
ments have. been received to date.
STATEMENT OF RELOCATION
AND
DISPLACEMENT OF PERSONS
The proposed Airport Master Plan as outlined in the Application for
Federal Assistance (GSA Standarfr.Fprm 424) will not involve the relocation of
any persons, residences;'.b~~inesses o.r structures.
STATEMENT OF.
PUBLIC HEARING COMPLIANCE
'.
The requirements for advertising
lined in Part 152.73 of the Federal
detailed Environmental Assessment and
of the Paris Airport Master Plan.
and conducting a public hearing a.s out-
Aviation Regulations were reviewed. A
Public Hearing will be performed as part
FBO CONSULTATION
The City of Paris has decided to develop an Airport Master Plan to guide
in future development of airport faciiities. In making the decision to under-
take this project, the City has consulted with all the appropriate Fixed Base
Operators with offices or facilities on the existing airport as required by
Section 8(b) of the Airport and Airways Improvement Act of 1982, as amended.
CERTIFICATION OF LOCAL FUNDS
It is the City's desire to prepare an
the applicationr and the City does have
general fund to support the local cost.
Airport Master Plan as described in
adequate funds available from the
Eri.cS". Cl'i ffo~d~ Mayor
04-10-89
Date
PARIS TEXAS
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY STATEMENT
It.is the policy of the City of Paris to encourage the participation of
disadvantaged business enterprises in the contracts and programs it funds with
federal assistance monies. . Paris has in the past, as. a matter of both
principle and law, established an Affirmative Action Program to ensure that no
person is discriminated against on the bases of race, color, creed, national
origin or sex in any program associated with Paris. This policy is to ensure
that disadvantaged business enterprises receive a fair percentage and fair
dollar volume of the contractual business done by the City.
This policy will be implemented by the structures of a Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise program under the prOV1S10n of 49CFR Part 23, with specific
emphasis on Rules 23.43 and 23.45. All provisions of this regulation will be
strictly adhered to as well as wholeheartedly endorsed and practices by the
City, its agent and emp.loyees. ' , , .
As a first step in implementing this program, copies of the plan will be made
available to members of the City Council, and disadvantaged business organiza-
tions. Notice of its availability will be mentioned in the local media.
Dated this
10th
day of Apri 1
, .'i989..
\-
. ~ ...... h". :..l.'.~'r'.~.-i.:}.. -'.. "
Eric S. Clifford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Mattie Cunningham , City Clerk
\.
\-
-r-&- (ClI''I['l( (f)~EI ~A.\IRm~\
"1"'- ;;;;.I~~~ ~~ ~:~__....~~
p
March 31, 1989
Ark-Tex Council of Governments
Attn: Mr. Jim Goerke
P. O. Box 5307
Texarkana, Texas 75505
RE: Executive Order 12372 Review
Airport Master Plan
Paris, Texas
, "
Dear Mr. Goerke:
This is to advise you that the City of .Paris is hereby glvlng
notification of its intent to submit an application for a grant under
the Airport Improvement Program (A.I.P.)..for... development of an Airport
Master Plan for the Cox Field. The pr.o9ram is administered by the
Federal Aviation Administration, De.partment of Transportation. A copy
of the grant applicationis attached.
This notification is in compliance with
Order 12372 wherein any state or local
notify the State Clearinghouse of its
as.s i stance.
the provision.s of Executive
subdivision is required to
intent to request federal
Please forward your review and comments to Mr. Earl
Engineer, City of Paris, P. O. Box 9037, Paris, Texas
Your prompt reply will be appreciated.
Smith, City
75461-9037.
Sincerely,
Eric S. Clifford
Mayor
P.O. BOX 1037 . PARIS, TeXAS 75460 . 214-785.7511
-r-fk. (CIIlri}PW (Qa~l ~A\OOII$1
--- ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~:~-_....~~
~
March 31, 1989
Texas Office of Budget and Planning.
P. O. Box 12428
Austin, Texas 78701
Re: Executive Order 12372 Review
.Airport Master Plan
Paris, Texas
Gentlemen:
This is to notify you that the City of Paris plans to submit an
appl ication for a grant under the Airport Improvement Program for .the
deve 1 opment of an Ai rport Master Pl an for Cox Fi e 1 d. The program is
administered by the Federal Aviation ..~dministration, Department of
Transportation. Two (2) copies of the grant application are attached.
"
This notification is in compliance with
Order 12372 wherei n any state or 1 oca 1
notify the State Clearinghouse of its
assistance.
the provi s ions of Executi ve
subdivision is required to
intent to request federal
Please forward your review and comments to ~1r. Earl
Engineer, City of Paris, P.O.. Box .9037, Paris, Texas
Your prompt reply would be appreciated.
Smith, City
75461-9037.
Sincerely,
Eric S. Clifford
Mayor
I~
I
P.O. BOX 1037 . PARIS, TEXAS 75460 . 214-785-7511