The URL can be used to link to this page

09 - Love Civic Center Project WRA Architects-Phase I Conclusions Proposed Amendment to Contract for Phase II WorkItem No. 9 TO: Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem & City Council FROM: Grayson Path, City Manager SUBJECT: LOVE CIVIC CENTER PROJECT WRA ARCHITECTS — PHASE I CONCLUSIONS PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PHASE II WORK DATE: July 12, 2021 BACKGROUND: At the February 8, 2021 City Council meeting, the City Council awarded a Professional Services Contract to WRA Architects, Inc. to perform Phase I services for the Love Civic Center Restoration Project. This project consisted of analyzing the original WRA Assessment from 2017, speaking with City and Chamber of Commerce Staff, analyzing the building, and developing new cost estimates to assist us with narrowing down our focus for future work given our finite set of available funding from the original bond. STATUS OF ISSUE: Working with City and Chamber Staff, WRA has completed Phase I and produced the attached Stakeholder Study Booklet complete with background information, statistical information, situational assessment, but most importantly a series of cost estimates for each of the known projects that we wish to pursue with restoring the Love Civic Center. There is more work than we can afford, particularly with HVAC, but using their analysis, we have been able to narrow the focus down to the following priorities (in no particular order): restroom renovations, roof repairs, lighting upgrades, flooring finish upgrades, ceiling tile replacement, security upgrades, fire alarm upgrades, door and window upgrades, ADA accessibility upgrades and painting. Specific work will still need to be identified within each of these categories, but using the cost estimates provided by WRA Architects, we wish to engage them now with designing and bidding phases. To accomplish this, an Amendment to the Professional Services Contract has been prepared and is ready for your approval tonight. If approved, we expect to have this project ready for contractor bidding by Spring 2022 and final work done in Fall 2022. City Staff will perform day-to-day oversight as the list of projects are not complex enough to warrant an Architect representative onsite for inspection and observance. We are also looking to work with WRA Architects, Inc. to assist us with hiring a Contractor -at -Risk. This would be a general contractor hired up front before the work is designed who the Architect and City can consult with. When you design and construct a building from the ground -up (brand new), it is relatively straight forward as you do not have any existing conditions to worry about. But when it comes to a restoration, it is advantageous to work with a contractor up front to help us walk through potential issues during design to help avoid numerous change orders due to unforeseen issues during the project (without knowing what is behind the walls, even the best plans could be wrong, so an experienced contractor can help us avoid these issues). This Contractor -at -Risk would then be tasked with obtaining their own sub- contractors pursuant to Texas Procurement Requirements for Contractor -at -Risk. BUDGET: For their services, WRA Architects will charge a not -to -exceed 8.5% of an estimated $1.1 million construction project. If the project comes in less than $1.1 million, then their fee will be less. This is a typical arrangement with an Architectural firm. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the Amendment #1 to the Professional Services Contract with WRA Architects, Inc. for Phase II services for the Love Civic Center and authorize the City Manager to sign. 2. Request more information to be brought back at a future City Council meeting. 3. Reject the Amendment #1 and advise City Staff as to next steps. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the Amendment #1 to the Professional Services Contract with WRA Architects, Inc. for Phase II services for the Love Civic Center and authorize the City Manager to sign. l [-„ % CHAMBEROF COMMERCE pl;�, .., 11, P I \IIGXAS Municipal Facility Master Plan Phase 1 - Stakeholder Study b � k. A R C..H I T E C.T.V. � R,E 43VJJ Stakeholder Study Booklet April 16',2021 WRA,, Vl114rchRecAs ° 'IM�117 IAehlit IIDulvp, SlIl�ke 1800, DaRa' m Texas 75251�� 14-,,',111150 w0077 [,Po,,re intentionall Y.Bankl City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center Chapter 1 - Executive Summary.................................................................... 04 Chapter 2 - Site Evaluation............................................................................. 05 Chapter 3 - Project Goals, Values and methodology .................................. 06 Project Methodology ITEM I Define Project Goals/ kick off Meeting ITEM II Stakeholder's Document ITEM III Preliminary Survey and Basemap Complete ITEM IV Program and schematic design ITEM V Project Budget (Draft) ITEM VI Design Development ITEM VII Construction Documentation ITEM VIII Construction Administration Chapter 4 - Facts and Data Analysis............................................................. 08 City Information Project Code Research Zoning Ordinance Research Chapter 5 - Probable Cost (Based on Sketches)............................................13 Chapter 6 - Preliminary Sketches................................................................... 16 Chapter7 - Next Steps..................................................................................... 20 Chapter 8 - Acknowledgements..................................................................... 21 Chapter9 - References.................................................................................... 21 _c M IARC HITECT kiRE� City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center Mr. Path, Thank you for the opportunity to collaborately partner with the city of Paris in your efforts to effectively plan for meeting current and future municipality facility needs. In close collaboration with the city stakeholders, WRA Architects and Caffey Architecture was tasked to evaluate the current state of the Love Civic Center. The current phase is the first step in the renovation process which recognizes the building's deficiencies as well as the needs of the community. The next phase of the project will be to narrow down the scope and select which renovations are desired in order to stay within the allowable budget. Currently, the City of Paris, TX Love Civic Center is below building code standards and is due for an upgrade to building systems and architectural renovations. The scope of the project was determined based on code requirements, accessibility needs, as well as aesthetic upgrades. After meeting with city representatives, the main areas of focus are restroom upgrades, flooring upgrades, painting, roof repairs, and building security. The following pages in this document give a more detailed look into our findings as well as a cost estimate for the work. Sincerely, Mary O'Brien, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C Principal, WRA Architects H. y CTURE U�, P it I S4 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center The Love Civic Center is a landmark building for the City of Paris and sits on 15.25 acres with 570 parking spaces. The building is in use throughout the year for a variety of events including gun shows, home shows, vaccine distribution, weddings, and performing arts as an example. The original building was designed by Denney Architects and built in 1993. The structure consists of 29,000 SF and, for it's age, is in good condition. There are deficiencies related to the age and constant use of the building that are in need of repair. The site surroundings are in usable condition with some exceptions including settlement cracks in sidewalks, creating a trip hazard per ADA accessibility. The site drainage is in fair condition, given that is sheet flows into the draignage swale at the west end of the site. The design team understands that the existing structure is in constant use by the community and there are patrons who visit the building as well as the neighboring veterans memorial site on a regular basis. The community welcomes the collaboration between the two sites, however there are security concerns of access to the entire civic center. The staff works deligently to supervise any visitors and ensure the facility remains safe. ICC �flt III, „'.._- NITE CTUI�,E.. YI..;� ' IIT" !� �"i Y W W City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center The project milestones outline the upcoming deadlines expectant by the team. Each Milestone will be in a form of submission to the city. Upon approval, the project will transition into the next milestones. Durations are prone to fluctuations based on city approval processes. PHASE I ITEM I Define Project Goals/ kick off Meeting .............................. 03/01/2021 ITEM II Stake holders Document and Presentation ....................... 04/01/2021 PHASE II (Upon Approval) ITEM III Preliminary Survey and Basemap...................................... TBD ITEM IV Program and schematic design .......................................... TBD ITEM V Project Budget (Draft) ......................................................... .......................... TBD ITEM VI Design Development......................................................... TBD ITEM VII Construction Documentation .......................................... TBD ITEM VIII Construction Administration ......................................... TBD A. Preliminary Assessment of Owner's Development Objectives. Provide a preliminary assessment of the Owner's Development Objectives and identify constraints and opportunities that will impact them. B. Identify, discuss, and prioritize values and goals that will impact the Project, including institutional purposes, growth objectives, and cultural, technological, temporal, aesthetic, symbolic, economic, environmental, safety, sustainability, and other relevant criteria. A. Gather available previous studies, data, reports, surveys, or other documents which have a direct bearing on the Site Evaluation and Project Feasibility Services. B. Available reports on existing facilities, site surveys, construction documents, and other owner documents, including existing program material, if any. C. Preliminary determination of space requirements, space relationships and circulation, including consideration of special requirements, such as ambient environment, safety and security, furnishings, flexibility and site information, where appropriate 0I�(, i�jl ""AAR ,,- CT ifE., P� i��.. 1 �� T a 6 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center Upon Approval from the city, The Design team will initiate Phase II. The phase II milestones are as follows. Duration and deadlines are to be determined based on approval of Phase I submissions. A. To include a preliminary survey of the project site locating adjacent roads, utilities, drainage patterns, and structures B. Drone video and 3D map generation C. Planning GIS level city map indicating all current properties and facilities D. Space inventory of existing spaces (spreadsheet) A. Develop agreed program and space utilization B. Kick off meeting with consultants C. High level specifications D. Submission of schematic design for approval from stakeholders A. Budget determined based on schematic design B. Review schedule, take corrective action required C. Submission to stakeholders for approval A.Establish design for the project based on schematic design B. specify materials, structural details and cased opening C. Submission to stakeholders for approval A. Finalized design from design development is approved B. Complete set of architectural drawings along with specifications C. Submission to stakeholders for approval D. Submission of drawings to contractors for Bidding and submission to the city for permits A. Attend and participate in all site meeting B. Host owner, contractor and architect meetings through construction C. Maintain and overview construction schedule and work with contractors on providing any additional information CJI E 7 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center STATE CONTI Paris, To Coordinates: Counties: Founded: Incorporated: Area: Total Land: Water: Population: City: Density: 33°39'45"N 95°3252"A Lamar 1840 1916 37.07 sq mi 35.19 sq mi 1.88 sq mi 25,171 706.08 sq mi NE'9G}tiM)RMO0.".; D CON "r E: T �Ak , c ff,E P R I S 8 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center Solar Analysis n. y Winter Spring Prevamng 5-N Prevailing s Average Wind Speed v Wind Speed MPH 15 13 it i% Gj g j S / � Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Summer Fall Prevailing s Prevalling 5 Wind Analysis �.RCH,TEC 1R 1l. i 4� N City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center (1001 11 1G /Ik ) IIIA I I ,,G I:I Uk,1 I I A",' S A degree day represents the difference between the mean daily temperature and the control temperature, 65°. Example: If the mean temperature for a given day is 85° this equals 20 cooling degree days. .,584 Heating IlfDe ree ��ly 650 450 250 50 -150 n b liar pr May Jun -350 -550 -750 (1001 11 1G /Ik ) IIIA I I ,,G I:I Uk,1 I I A",' S A degree day represents the difference between the mean daily temperature and the control temperature, 65°. Example: If the mean temperature for a given day is 85° this equals 20 cooling degree days. City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center When the dewpoint and the temperature are high it is commonly referred to as high relative humidity. High tempera- tures tell our body to sweat, and relative high humidity inhibits evaporation of the sweat, creating human discomfort. Rainfall hi Inches Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 CA, P f.. 'f i 11 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center City FY Population Staff HE Staff / pop Effective Rate Debt Rate Van Alstyne 2020 4,928 45.5 108.3 $0.55 $0.10 Anna 2020 151010 102.5 146.4 $0.54 $0.14 Prosper 2020 25,630 216.5 118.4 $0.49 $0.15 Princeton 2020 16,547 108 153.2 $0.62 $0.28 Melissa 2019 12,000 57 210.5 $0.57 $0.17 Celina 20201 17,942 168 106.81 $0.63 $0.19 (City of Anna, TX, n.d.) (Town of Prosper, TX, n.d.) (City of Princeton, TX, n.d.) (City of Melissa, TX, n.d.) (City of Celina, TX, n.d.) (City of Melissa, TX, n.d.) The city has adopted the following recommended regional amendments from the North Central Texas Council of Governments: (1) 2015 International Residential Code—Regional Amendments. (2) 2015 International Building Code—Regional Amendments, Option B. (3) 2015 International Existing Building Code—Regional Amendments. (4) 2015 International Fire Code—Regional Amendments, Option B. (5) 2015 International Plumbing Code, 2015 edition. (6) 2015 International Mechanical Code, 2015 edition. (7) 2015 International Fuel Gas Code, 2015 edition. (8) 2015 International Energy Conservation Code, 2015 edition. (9) 2014 National Electrical Code, 2014 edition. (10) 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act (11) 2012 Texas Accessibility Standards (12) 2014 ICC -500 (13) Code of Ordinances of City of Paris, Tx. Site 1 - PLI- Public Land and Institution district Permitted use within District - Utility and Service Buildings, Exhibit Areas and Fairgrounds C. �N -` '�S12 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center The probable cost provided have been escalated to current day inflation and take into account labor cost. If options are provided, the first of the options have been included in the estimate. Please reach out to the design team if you would like any elaboration. * Indicates that the section is elaborated separately and is custimized as per needs at the time of this document publication. City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center CA, 1 13, 1 S 14 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center 0�,.. �u _. `GMITECT C.O., � m �� p it I S 15 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center Below is a break down of the Probable cost for the HVAC systems only. Indicated are the units broken down by their tonnage and the year of manufacture. Based on the assesment provided by WRA, units older or close to 15 years of life need to be replaced. Units that need to be replaced today are indicated in red and have been included in the total estimate. Other units to be replaced in the near future are indicated by orange and units indicated in green are in good condition and are exempt from replacement. New controls for the entire building have been included in the estimate at the rate of $4.00 per SF of the building. The total estimate indicated here has been added to the total estimate provided in the previous sheets. 1 �--_� AA CHITE CTURE9 Co -i p < i S 16 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center The preliminary sketches are diagrammed to show the location for upgrade or renovation. The denoted call outs refer to the line items in the probable cost sheet that indicate line item estimate for change. Y. . — — — — — — — — — — — — --- - H. L@LOVE CIVIC �E CENTER CIVIC RESTORATION CACEM PROJECT f�cxre crone 17 _ IDs" .i i S 17 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center KEY PLAN LOVE CIVIC CENTER two"Fl-I CIVIC RESTORATION CIM PROJECT �.. C,.v J� •RONITECTURE 1111 ;�1 S 18 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center I As% C.q -IWARCHITECTU fjOIm i .4F "I IMF WEST ELEVATION 9 U9B KEYED NOTES ' EXTERIOR DIAGRAM LOVE CIVIC CENTER CIVIC RESTORATION CUM PROJECT p R I S 19 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center Based on the information provided in the stakeholders document, the design team is looking for direction of change and edits to the proposal. Upon approval of information submitted to the city in the stakeholders document and phase II proposal, the design team will progress through the design milestones outlines in Chapter 3 phase II Jil", 1 V 01INyr I� P R 1 S 20 City of Paris, Texas Love Civic Center This project is greatly enhanced by the active participation of city staff at all levels who were all generous in sharing of their time and knowledge. City Staff Grayson Path, City of Paris - City Manager Paul Allen, City of Paris - Chamber President Bryan Glass, City of Paris Gina Crawford, City of Paris Randy Nation, City of Paris Consultant Team Mary O'Brien, WRA Architects Nandita Rajakumar, WRA Architects Laura Caffey, Caffey Architecture 1. American Institute of Architects (AIA). (n.d.). AIA B203-2005 O -A Site Evaluation &Planning. 2. Whole Building Design Guide - Architectural Programming. (n.d.). Retrieved from National Institute of Buidling Sciences: https://wwwwbdg.org/design-disciplines/ architectural -programming 3. Code of Ordinances. (2019). paris. 4. City of Paris, Tx. (n.d.). Retreived from http://www.paristexas.com/the-chamber/ 5. City of Anna, TX. (n.d.). Retrieved from https:/lwww.annatexas.gov/ArchiveCenter/ ViewFile/Item/ 1026 6. City of Celina, TX. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.celina-tx.gov/880/Approved-Budgets 7. City of Melissa, TX. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.cityofmelissa.com/Departments/ Finance/Financial%20Transparency/2018-19%2OBudget%2OAdopted%2OFinal%2001.30.18. pdf 8. City of Princeton, TX. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://princetontx.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2019/ 12/PrincetonTX-FY20.pdf 41"* - H I TE C TORE �� C'..011 ; R i IS 21 P RISEXAS LAMACOUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE N E. ............ _CT WIZA Architects wraard fltects.coin i II `2 �3 IIVleilit Dilve, Sulte'1800 eXas 11 T,:i251 , 7510 0 0 77 THE STATE OF TEXAS § Professional Services Contract COUNTY OF LAMAR § Amendment #1 THIS AMENDMENT to the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT is entered into on this 12th day of July, 2021, by and between the CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, a municipal corporation located in Lamar County, Texas, (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), acting by and through its City Manager or his designee, and WRA Architects, Inc. ("hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT") whose address is 12377 Merit Drive, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75251. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, CITY desires to obtain architectural services from CONSULTANT related to the Love Civic Center Restoration Project; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is an architectural firm qualified to provide such services and is willing to undertake the performance of such services for CITY in exchange for fees hereinafter specified; and WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT entered in to a Professional Services Contract on the 811 day of February, 2021, for Phase I services for the Love Civic Center Project; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has satisfactorily completed Phase I services; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to proceed with Phase II services from CONSULTANT for the Love Civic Center; NOW, THEREFORE, THAT IN CONSIDERATION of the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter stated, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: I. Professional Services Contract The terms and conditions as provided in the Professional Services Contract remain in full force and effect, except as amended in this Amendment #1. II. Scone of Services CONSULTANT shall perform such services related to the Love Civic Center Restoration Project specifically including, but not necessarily limited to, the tasks enumerated more fully in Attachment "A" hereto entitled "Scope of Work" (hereafter referred to as the "Project"). Services not set forth in Attachment A shall be additional services and should CONSULTANT perform such additional services as permitted in the Professional Services Contract shall entitle CONSULTANT to payment of additional compensation. Attachment "A" is hereby incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof as if written word for word. However, in case of conflict in the language of Attachment "A" and the Professional Services Contract, the terms and conditions of the Professional Services Contract shall be final and binding upon both parties hereto. III. Payment for Services Total payment for services described herein shall be a sum not to exceed eight and half percent (8.5%) of actual construction costs estimated at $1.1 million. All other terms and conditions of Section III of the Professional Services Contract remain in full force and effect. IV. Term and Time of Performance This Amendment #1 shall begin on the date first written above, and shall terminate when CITY has approved the Project as being final or otherwise terminates this Contract as provided herein. The CONSULTANT shall commence services upon execution of this Amendment #1. Unless terminated, or unless the Scope of Services and Time of Performance are changed in accordance with Article XV of the Professional Services Contract, the CONSULTANT shall complete the Scope of Services provided under Article II by September 30, 2022. All other terms and conditions of Section V of the Professional Services Contract remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands by their representatives duly authorized on the day and year first written above. -------------------SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS ---------------------- Architectural Services Contract — Amendment #1 WRA Architects, Inc. Page 2 of 8 ATTEST: Janice Ellis City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: STEPHANIE HARRIS City Attorney CITY OF PARIS By: GRAYSON PATH City Manager Date Signed: WCArefitects, Inc. U3 Name: Mary O'Brien, AIA Title: Principal -in -Charge Date Signed: 7/6/2021 [Remainder of page left blank intentionally] Architectural Services Contract — Amendment #1 WRA Architects, Inc. Page 3 of 8 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF LAMAR BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for said County, Texas, on this day personally appeared GRAYSON PATH, City Manager of the CITY OF PARIS, a Texas Municipal Corporation, known to me to be the person who's name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he has executed the same on the City's behalf. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS THE DAY OF 20 Notary Public Lamar County, Texas My commission expires THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of „m m , 20 , by in his capacity as of _ a Corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same on behalf of and as the act of GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS THE DAY OF , 20 Notary Public My commission expires Architectural Services Contract — Amendment #1 WRA Architects, Inc. County, Texas Page 4 of 8 Attachment "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES PHA5.E.11 PROGRAMMING, DESIGN, PROCUREMENT AND CONSULTATION SERVICES Mr% Grayson Fath, June 24, 2022, cilv IV'anapr Proposal for ArchitecturaW Engineering Services 13�E I'street "'anis.,, TX 754V3, Re: Proposal for City of Paris, TX Civic Center 11: ,D ea; WRA .41Ic1kAeqAs, fin:, is plea'seed tr"� V'Pmsent th("' foihn"dng fkn Enginee!Hng ser "'Ices to �hfr 41,114,"oi Flaw', lt":Nas for the pr<!sject� A/E Fee; The, Er"Phileoing !3enice lett f�,x thk jjamject vdfl be petcentage, ot Construction! r,-,oM. basei �,nii the I�,wdgd, axId scope a:aufltned hi 0-te pgopos,-,i] For phase 2 of the renovations to the Love Civic Center, with a construction budget of approximately $1.1 million, we, propose an architectural services fee of, not to exceed, eight and half percent (8.5%) of actual construction costs. J,pJ.gjg t ovall'on to the T�'ie pge,�ject consists es�gn and ot a rEnx Q'I%ic („c ntr.rCrra':,rleo.S al 2D25 5, C(Alegkitt',, Dr, lkmis,'l X 75460. :'iss beeni e:orrhpleted and hic,haded prt,rgjjain,in6ng and to estat'Aid'i the; ,,,,aiosarid is the Ch,44Centfn Pk% ase 2%011, be based on th:(andhigs ril"fr,ne sjpiecificaH,,,, 41ejiltufed in 13, 1! 5 4,,i!f dte Stxat�Ahoi&`s Saak�et, I"L h! t° III fa! gely s'covsts Of aestnl"XXYI 142410%1„3fioins' root r'('q:hare 's"Vri PrliraP, tq,gu"-Ies, flk°x�)6ng' fini!�ih �qgradeg B Puff,' )'Vay, Cswid(,�rs and orliereni,,:e R0139,11s Pas c6hng We r4a!pPa<',errient, sec�iNty upgrades, fire allann 4upgnsdes, andwhi&upguades, AD,A accessibih',,y,: upgradei,and exteidr'a11 k0edrnjx"dnfirlt}"' Q J N,",ar N S'vj'N/'7, 7!2",'f T �"'Q'fpc' Architectural Services Contract — Amendment #1 WRA Architects, Inc. Page 5 of 8 WRA k pmud W the fact ffiat c'tta basic se0hw4ces fee includes the 4C19�1St seivices ht the firtdt.hsby, A parflat, flst of standaid as Mwe 3D Ww 3D kw% EAMM OWWMg SPU au arc hhwt DQin FF&E C000dirwkr,, "'kssnral,,Ce' Cwmaa DmIlei vus - Plam and Spec Mcadons Noon NsanuM 0 13i,6ldwq V',,,,Jn, k uw e"Wdyt 1"m6mbg Mmmaln Dmvmwt,,�,, 0 001 EngkwvlQ Engweedng if's ('Life ar""J" Fire 5,4,-stennns fcbmQ MWmaum ENMg,,,2 Mv Mge Syewn DeQ, ;QMMkM3bMwn MMM401 Dmj"' FoMewle CanwhOg and Men Eksyn, 1 wdKye AmMwme wt 4 4MOn Do4n Rooi'(��.orisidflng artd I)esign ccesslibO,4'T''v ADAAl (9°" t, VVayfindirlg Design Zon,'nrig . . ... � Cmumahn MWMwakn r'Zkne I ut ',,Alal ran",, flrte 1,.woject se,,,,r,,,kes are nat ui)6!,wt1,"9e,, .'Ikrchitects' saqseoQmpmmbHq and cmimushima" Wh be ckq Muld the,,y, 1w reqihed: 149bwida9y �!Ae MM, cMl en&ewhig ca Wke' Met rnodificaflonis air,kd VOW Wkq and any adw mnwhwl doln ser,,ISP es n!�'qp,6tef,:l fo,%y thoe citry, testing irw,'Jtldir% asloes= uzny,', geowdMus immolson and knwkaHort rnaterW �,estli'C& II IVAC Wt md bWwwe kammNAM& and Thms Amen hil Starx1aids pi[an moietv 1 he Ardh,,itect vviH assist 4,11 the t 4 these Architectural Services Contract — Amendment #1 WRA Architects, Inc. Page 6 of 8 Antic d Schedule: `3elea�Akuii of Aa [dte,,u:tuvai Finrn July 2021 PrcTuan,,,frnirig and Ne - Ida siSt"I CvrrYp4,led 'n'mna fliwase Stakef'mkfer's Bou Met khemak DeMp and EAQ DewkpmeM Cat-riplete Septembe� '2C),21, (2 n'icrithsl Cf!mstiuction 0octerients l:w"ber 3021. (3 manQ'I Period Ctwnptet(,,a hWmh 202. 0 maKs), consuixuan Sipternlx!022�,6 WtRMBww&pV' M'Iej'x.:w OFVT�em Mtn G AWWON Badc NO, 1 bamW cwt pemenmg of conshucdon cmt pmpns Wgs W51" WH be bz�',aerl an flie cost unUf due mclu',fl cr d5t �s WaWkhed, nes herrW aCc �rrI DO,, Design� ()1e,,,,fa1op'nent --------- 300111 WwWon Dcwurnent",-- 3 5%a BWd&gTNgWWUon Pho conmMuml Phase !SdyElcept as r6puM whvmhe W dhe Ofir evAmbRect agreemml, pqnmM to adMW Modwk subms wW be pwo=i,,aA fle houOy 'ti"vhich icWk1w, fhese rates sl"iall oke amwQ almd & aan%me uth nomid KaW Wom pmcHcn cl dw 1�0=1111 ratA,,',,,s to be dewmked as nseded H! be II eadzed asul ideMlaed as Elsic Senkes, R5w&wwWe EVeme cndrJ�J'Nonal Sewtces. Llrdie;ss, ot+ta,nkxhe sal(CL staternerits ,,i,4H be sOmMmEd a%m Ow be., mmomNs h bun ddlowL Flayrrjer'9Ts)wfll! 1a4;°,lvlthiri thirty 90,'� days AWNg reQ of Ae sWwmwnt, Neme Modze and rdwn a Qwd cq)y to thk,-, offlce if ace:,epta[-de. IN ajj,,qp,-o,,,ec,,4 it k, undeStxxd,,:i Umt a WW agieernent estabHsk", alapkcable tiarrm aind �4°uWuo.kulttrnWe'a ax 101 me�kluW1.,"a Architectural Services Contract — Amendment #1 WRA Architects, Inc. Page 7 of 8 2 1 0,004,ti"'mar Associates1';o"foO!hC'H 111' . ..... . ........ F Wd 4Dbse4 Sec�f,etinrW!Y\Iad Rots:'SSNIR, ratA,,',,,s to be dewmked as nseded H! be II eadzed asul ideMlaed as Elsic Senkes, R5w&wwWe EVeme cndrJ�J'Nonal Sewtces. Llrdie;ss, ot+ta,nkxhe sal(CL staternerits ,,i,4H be sOmMmEd a%m Ow be., mmomNs h bun ddlowL Flayrrjer'9Ts)wfll! 1a4;°,lvlthiri thirty 90,'� days AWNg reQ of Ae sWwmwnt, Neme Modze and rdwn a Qwd cq)y to thk,-, offlce if ace:,epta[-de. IN ajj,,qp,-o,,,ec,,4 it k, undeStxxd,,:i Umt a WW agieernent estabHsk", alapkcable tiarrm aind �4°uWuo.kulttrnWe'a ax 101 me�kluW1.,"a Architectural Services Contract — Amendment #1 WRA Architects, Inc. Page 7 of 8 Archl,,tect: Mary O'Brien WPA Architects, Inc. signako e ap�� _Date Sig,Fiat ure Date Architectural Services Contract — Amendment #1 WRA Architects, Inc. Page 8 of 8