Loading...
824 NE 3rd Street - Variance granted for 3' to front yard setbackw MMS DECISION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS RE: Variance Request Audrey Bills 824 NE 3rd St Paris, TX 75460 ACTION REQUESTED: Variance of 3' to front yard setback The above -reference request was gant `d,J denied / granted in part and denied impart) by the City r e of Paris Zoning Board of Adjustment ("Board") on 09/07/2021 by a vote of ..._. in favor of the application and against the application with (.) abstaining. On this date, the Board found that the request met the conditions set forth in Section 9-501 of the City of Paris Zoning Ordinance Area Regulations. Appeal: Any interested person wishing to appeal this Board decision is required to file a petition for Writ of Certiorari in a district court, county court or county court at law within ten (10) days of the date this decision is filed in the Board's office consistent with section 211.011 of the Texas Local Government Code. The Board of Adjustment here by approves the variance request based upon the following findings of fact. Board of Adjustment Recommended Findings of Fact 1. Although there are no unique conditions or features of the property, the house is constructed in the middle of the lot making it impossible to construct a two -car attached carport on the north side of the lot without a variance. 2. Substandard building setbacks are prevalent in the surrounding properties of this area. 3. The literal compliance with Sections 9-501 & 9-601 of the Zoning Ordinance would cause unnecessary hardship given the fact that dwelling was previously constructed in the middle of the parcel without room for a 2 stall wide carport without a variance. 4. The granting of the variance will not violate the spirit or the intent of this article, but it will allow a structure to be permitted adjacent to the neighboring property line. 5. The condition or feature which creates the need for the variance does result from the property owner's own actions. There is room to construct an accessory carport structure in the rear yard without a variance. 6. The variance by the applicant is not solely for personal convenience, financial hardship, or other reasons unrelated to the property, but physical convenience with the structure in the proposed location would be favorable to the land owner where requested. 7. The proposed use of a new attached carport accessory structure for the single-family dwelling is a permitted addition to the principal residential use of the property in the 2F Zoning District. This decision was filed in the Board's office on 09/07/2021. C�Ji' -11-11111- ............... . . . Chairman, Board of Adjustment Secretary to the Board