Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Paris shall meet in regular session
at 5:30 p.m. on Monday, September 23, 2024. The meeting will be held at the City Council
Chamber, 107 E. Kaufman Street, in Paris, Texas. One or all Council Members may be
attending remotely, but the feed will be available for live viewing at
httl s:// grist.,e�ov/fublic. The matters to be discussed and acted upon are as follows:
Opening Agenda
1. Call meeting to order.
2. Invocation.
3. United States Pledge of Allegiance & Texas Pledge of Allegiance.
4. Citizens' forum.
(Persons desiring to address the Council must limit their presentation to no more than two minutes. Unless
an item is posted on the Agenda, the Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits the Council from responding to any
comments other than to refer the matter to a future agenda, to an existing policy, or to a staff person with
specific factual information. Claims against the City, Council Members, or employees, as well as individual
personal appeals are not appropriate for citizens' forum.)
If necessary, the City Council may convene into Executive Session under Chapter 551 of the Texas
Government Code regarding any item on this agenda.
Consent Agenda
Items on the Consent Agenda are approved by a single action of the Council, with such approval applicable
to all items appearing on the Consent Agenda. A Council Member may request any item to be removed from
the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item.
5. Approve minutes from the meetings of August 26, 2024, September 9, 2024, and
September 10, 2024.
6. Receive reports and/or minutes from the following boards and commissions:
a. Paris Economic Development Corporation (6-25-2024 & 7-12-2024)
b. Planning & Zoning Commission (8-5-2024)
c. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Board (8-8-2024)
d. Main Street Advisory Board (8-13-2024)
e. Historic Preservation Commission (8-14-2024)
f. Building and Standards Commission (8-19-2024)
7. Receive July monthly financial report.
8. Receive August drainage report.
9. Receive demolition and code enforcement activity reports.
10. Approve the Final Plat of the Ricardo Ramirez Estates Addition, Lot 1, LCAD 15973,
located at 610 W. Austin.
11. Approve the Final Plat of the River Oaks Subdivision Phase II, Lots 1, 2, 3, Block B, LCAD
403262 and 104885, located in the 3000 Block of Aikin Dr.
12. Approve the Final Plat of the Rodriguez 98 Addition, Lot 1, Block A, LCAD 15469,
located at N.W. 7t" & Henderson.
13. Approve the Final Plat of the Ranches at Twin Lakes Addition, Lots 1-59, LCAD 71680,
71923, 715679, 70238, 70240 and 403541, located in the ETJ.
14. Approve the refund of funds remaining in RAM's original donation of $300,000.00 in the
amount of $108,722.16 in accordance with the January 24, 2024 MOU amendment.
15. Approve an agreement in the amount of $24,255.00 with Baker Tilly for services related
to recruitment of a Finance Director; and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute
same.
Regular Agenda
16. Receive a presentation from CARDS about the solid waste collection process and progress.
17. Discuss and act on a Resolution Amending the Tax Abatement Agreement between the
City of Paris and Lionshead Specialty Tire & Wheel, LLC.
18. Discussion and act on an Ordinance Amending Division 2, "Planning and Zoning
Commission," of Chapter 2 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Paris, Texas, to
formally reduce the number of members from nine to seven members.
19. Discuss and act on an agreement with LT Wings for construction of an access road, to be
funded by LT Wings, LLC; and authorize the Interim City Manage to execute all necessary
documents.
20. Discuss and act on an Ordinance approving a negotiated settlement between the Atmos
Cities Steering committee and Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division regarding the
Company's 2024 Rate Review Mechanism filing; declaring existing rates to be
unreasonable; adopting Tariffs that reflect rate adjustments consistent with the negotiated
Settlement; finding the rates to be set by the attached Settlement Tariffs to be just and
reasonable and in the public interest; approving an attachment establishing a benchmark
for Pensions and Retiree Medical Benefits; requiring the Company to reimburse ACSC's
reasonable ratemaking expenses; determining that this Ordinance was passed in accordance
with the requirements of the Texas Open Meetings Act.
21. Discuss and act on meeting dates in November and December.
22. Discuss and act on a request from the TIRZ Board to approve an expenditure for the
retention of a consultant to assist the Board with strategies for reviewing and possibly
amending the Project and Finance Plans for TIRZ No. 1
23. Consider and approve future events for City Council and/or City Staff pursuant to
Resolution No. 2004-081.
24. Adjournment.
Certification
1 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board in the City Hall Annex, 150 First
St. SE, Paris, Texas and on the City's website at www.pAristexas.gov, no later than 5:30 p.m. on September
20, 2024.
Janice Ellis, City Clerk
Special Accommodations
This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for special
accommodations or interpretive services must be made forty-eight (48) hours prior to this meeting. Please
contact Janice Ellis at (903) 784-9248 or jellis@paristexas.gov for assistance.
Item No. 5
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
August 26, 2024
The City Council of the City of Paris met for a regular session at 5:30 p.m. on Monday,
August 26, 2024, at the City Council Chamber, 107 E. Kaufman, Paris, Texas.
Present: Mayor: Mihir Pankaj
Mayor Pro -Tem: Gary Savage
Council Members: Shatara Moore, Rebecca Norment, Alix Putnam
and Rudy Kessel
City Staff: Rob Vine, Interim City Manager; Janice Ellis, City
Clerk; Gene Anderson, Finance Director; Rich
Salter, Police Chief; M.A. Smith, Public Works
Director; Osei Amo-Mensah, City Planner;
Thomas McMonigle, Tom Hunt, Municipal Judge;
Fire Chief; Todd Mittge, City Engineer; Danny
Rowell, Interim Utilities Director; and Clyde
Crews, Fire Marshal
Absent: Council Member: Mickey Ellis
Opening Agenda
1. Call meeting to order.
Mayor Pankaj called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
2. Invocation.
Finance Director Gene Anderson gave the invocation.
3. United States Pledge of Allegiance & Texas Pledge of Allegiance.
City Council led the United States Pledge of Allegiance and the Texas Pledge of
Allegiance.
4. Citizens' Forum.
Alvin Atwood, 2419 Bonham — expressed that he was glad about the Council's dialogue
with each other. He also said a lot of people from out of town were buying property and letting
it grow up.
Zion Tarrones, 1095 Culbertson — he said a new skate park needed to be built and he had
a petition of over 300 signatures who were in favor of this.
Regular Council Meeting
August 26, 2024
Page 2
Tommy Haynes, 3095 Abbott Lane — he spoke in support of a COLA for retirees and
said there were a narrow window for the updated service credit.
Danny Huff, 625 Beaver Creek Road — he spoke in support of the increase of police pay
and said it would help with recruitment and retention.
Consent Agenda
Mayor Pankaj inquired of Council Members if they wished to pull any items from the
consent agenda for discussion. There being none, a Motion to approve the consent agenda was
made by Council Member Kessel and seconded by Council Member Moore. Motion carried, 6
ayes — 0 nays.
5. Approve minutes from the meeting of August 12, 2024.
6. Receive reports and/or minutes from the following boards and commissions:
a. Historic Preservation Commission (4-11-2024 & 5-8-2024)
b. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone "TIRZ" Board (7-11-2024)
c. Main Street Advisory Board (7-9-2024)
d. Airport Advisory Board (5-16-2024)
e. Paris Public Library Advisory Board (6-12-2024 & 7-17-2024)
f. Building & Standards Commission (7-15-2024)
7. Receive June monthly financial report.
8. Approve RESOLUTION NO. 2024-037: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT (AFA) WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION FOR A TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES SET-
ASIDE (TASA) PROJECT; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
9. Approve the Final Plat of the Jose Hernandez Addition CB 133, Lots 1 and 2, Block A,
LCAD 16170 and 16172, located in the 900 Block of W. Sherman.
10. Approve the Final Plat of the Martinez Addition CB 53, Lot 1, LCAD 14244, located at
373 N.W. 5th
11. Close out the contract with Pro Tech Track & Tennis, Inc. for the Pickleball Court
Construction Project, accept the completed project, and authorize final payment in the
amount of $189,979.99.
Regular Council Meeting
August 4
Page
12. Discuss and act on ORDINANCE i:.ORDINANCE
TEXAS,COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS,
TEXAS,NO. 17 10 OF THE CITY OF PARIS, AS AMENDED,,
TO ALLOW 4 s FOR MIXED USE IN ..
SERVICENEIGHBORHOOD
ADDITION,#17543, LOCATED AT A
PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, A SAVINGS
CLAUSE, A PENALTY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
City Planner Osei Amo-Mensah explained the applicant was requesting a SUP to allow
for a new business "Sage Aesthetics," « Planning and Zoning
recommended approval subject to approval of interior fire wall separations and/or fire sprinkler
system improvements by the Building Official and Fire Marshal,prior
of Occu-oancv. Mr. Amo-Mensah said City Staff also recommended approval
Mayor Pankaj opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak about
this item, to please come forward. With no one speaking, ayo antra closed the public
hearing.
MooreA Motion to approve this item was made by Council Member Shatara
carried,seconded by Council Member Kessel. Motion
13. Discuss, conduct a public hearing and act on ORDINANCE4
ORDINANCE
ORDINANCEAMENDING ZONING r PARIS,
i L TEXAS,
AS HERETOFORE
AMENDED, REZONE PROPERTIES LOCATED
WITHIN HISTORIC
(HD-2), OTHERWISE KNOWN
ASSINGLE-FAMILY
CHANGESDWELLING DISTRICT NO. I (SF -1); DIRECTING
OFFICIALTHE ZONING M, PROVIDING ,4 REPEALER i'
CLAUSE;CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, A SAVINGS CLAUSE, A PENALTY
AND PROVIDING DATE.
Mr. Amo-Mensah said Staff was directed to send this to the Planning and Zoning
Commission for consideration, andthe Commission unanimouslyrecommended
approval of the amendment. He said Staff also recommended approval.
Mayor
Pankaj openedthe public hearingand wishing to speak '
forward.this item, to please come
Council. She said it cost those living in the Historic District a lot of money anytime they made
changes to theirand the changeo Single Family would help their neighborhood. Robert
Spain, 655 S. Church — spoke in favor of Single Family and said they had for
years to get this done. He also said they were very interested in protecting the Historic District.
Regular Council Meeting
August 26, 2024
Page 4
Sims Norment, 606 S. Church, he spoke in support of Single Family Dwellings. With no one
else speaking, Mayor Pankaj closed the public hearing.
A Motion to approve this item was made by Mayor Pro -Tem Savage and seconded by
Council Member Norment. Motion carried, 6 ayes — 0 nays.
14. Receive quarterly report on demolition projects.
Code Enforcement Supervisor Robert Talley said this was to have been a quarterly report
however, the report would cover January through August. Mr. Talley's presentation including
identification of substandard structures, identifying the owner and/or lienholder, notify the
owners and/or lienholder, place an orange sticker on the structure and publish the violation notice
in the Paris News. He explained that once the steps were taken, Staff would present photos and
commentary to the Building and Standards Commission, the Commission asks questions and if
the owner or lienholder was present at the meeting they were given the opportunity to speak with
the Commission, then the Commission would deliberate and place Orders upon the structure.
Mr. Talley said after the Orders were issued, they would be sent to the owner and/or lienholder
and filed with he County Clerk and once the allotted time required by law had passed, and if
there was no appeal to District Court, a request to remove utility services was given, a final non-
compliance notice was sent to the owner and/or lienholder, once the utility services were
removed the structure would be placed on the demolition list and after the structure was
demolished, a bill would be sent to the property owner and/or lienholder. He also said if the bill
was not paid, a lien would be filed with the County Clerk against the property.
Mr. Talley reported that from 2020 to the present, approximately 255 structures had been
presented to BSC for demolition and of those, 162 structures had been demolished. He said
currently there were 55 structures remaining on the demolition list. Mr. Talley said the City
demolished 45 structures during the 2023-24 budget year and since January, were responsible
for demolishing 29 structures.
Council Member Norment said the cost of publishing notices was expensive and asked
if that was required. Mr. Talley said it was required by State Law. Council Member Putnam
asked about the cost of one demolition and Mr. Talley said on an average it was $2,500 to $3,000.
Council Member Norment asked if they could take down more if that had more staff. Mr. Talley
said they could. Mayor Pro -Tem Savage said with current staff, they had one crew but with
more staff they could add another crew. Mr. Talley said during wet months, they were not able
to take down as many houses. Mayor Pro -Tem Savage said that meant there was approximately
$40,000 worth of work they were not able to get done so in the summer months, and they should
be taking down more structures. Mr. Talley said he would go back and look at numbers to
determine if they were leaving money on the table, because he did not think it was that much.
Mayor Pro -Tem Savage said Council gets a lot of phone calls on these dilapidated structures and
asked Mr. Tally if they needed more money. Mr. Talley said with more money, they could take
down more structures. Mayor Pro -Tem Savage asked staff to look at other legal ways to notify
property owners instead of the newspaper. Mr. Talley said staff would do that, and would reach
out to other cities. Council Member Norment inquired if they could use both the abatement and
demo team at the same time with no additional costs to the City, and Mr. Talley answered in the
Regular Council Meeting
August 26, 2024
Page 5
affirmative. Mayor Pankaj asked about specific challenges and Mr. Talley said more education
was needed for people to understand which houses and do and do not meet the standards for
demolition.
15. Discuss and act on RESOLUTION NO. 2024-038: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, AMENDING THE GUIDELINES AND
CRITERIA ON THE 5 IN 5 HOUSING INFILL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM;
MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Mr. Amo-Mensah explained that on March 11, 2024, the City imposed a moratorium on
the Housing 5 -In -5 Program to review the efficiency and effectiveness of the program. He said
the following major changes/amendments were made: 1) lower limit to a single structure which
would allow a smaller contractor or investor to participate in the program; 2) setting a cap of 10
dwelling units per contract -limits conflicts with building and fire codes; 3) reducing incentives
for multi -dwelling units on same lot -encourages and promotes more single-family infill projects;
4) restructured reduced permit/plan review/tap fees -reductions better correlate to staff workload;
5) clarified and state zoning policy to reduce confusion and align with the City's comprehensive
plan. No zoning change unless there is a substantial change in neighborhood or compatible with
he future land use map, as determined by the Director of Planning & Community; 6) included
matrix to simplify and increase consumer understanding; and 7) developer must be 80%
complete, as determined by the Building Official, with any awarded in -fill
agreement/development prior to the submission of a new application.
Following a brief discussion. a Motion to approve this item was made by Mayor Pro -
Tem Savage and seconded by Council Member Putnam. Motion carried, 6 ayes 0 nays.
16. Discuss and act on ORDINANCE NO. 2024-028: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, ADOPTING A REVISED AND
CONSOLIDATED WATER CONSERVATION/DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS 11.1271 AND
11.272 OF THE TEXAS WATER CODE AND APPLICABLE RULES OF THE
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; MAKING OTHER
FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; REPEALING ALL
PRIOR DROUGHT CONTINGENCY AND WATER CONSERVATION PLANS IN
CONFLICT HEREWITH; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS
RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE, A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, A SAVINGS CLAUSE, A PENALTY CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Interim Director of Utilities Danny Rowell said updates to the Drought
Contingency/Water were required by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality every
five years.
A Motion to approve this item was made by Council Member Putnam and seconded by
Council Member Kessel. Motion carried, 6 ayes — 0 nays.
Regular Council Meeting
August 26, 2024
Page 6
17. Discuss and act on any necessary edits to the proposed budget for FY 2024-2025.
Interim City Manager Rob Vine reviewed the budget timeline beginning with the August
12 meeting wherein City Council heard a presentation regarding the proposed FY24/25 budget.
Mr. Vine said City Council conducted two budget workshops on August 19 and August 22. Mr.
Vine said edits made included an increase in police salaries, updated service credits and a COLA
for retirees. He also said there was a decrease in the City Attorney's budget, property tax was
adjusted to the di-minimis rate, a couple of revenue items were adjusted because they were low.
Mayor Pro -Tem Savage said he recently met with Mr. Vine and Mr. Anderson and said
most of the Council had expressed they wanted the community development coordinator re-
classified because the salary did not reflect the job responsibilities this person was doing. He
also said this employee had been overlooked several times, and this had been mentioned for at
least three years. Mayor Pro -Tem Savage said he did not want to wait until the next budget year.
Mr. Anderson said it was his understanding that a job description for this position was being re-
written and once they had that, they could come back with a budget amendment.
A Motion to approve the edits as discussed was approved by Mayor Pro -Tem Savage and
seconded by Council Member Moore. Motion carried, 6 ayes — 0 nays.
18. Discuss and act on RESOLUTION NO. 2024-039: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024, ON THE CITY MANAGER'S PROPOSED BUDGET FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS
RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Mr. Anderson said a public hearing on the proposed budget was required by Section 48
of the City Charter and Section 102.006 of the Local Government Code. He said the City Council
needed to pass a resolution calling for a public hearing on the 2024-25 budget on September 9,
2024.
A Motion to approve this item was made by Council Member Kessel and seconded by
Council Member Norment. Motion carried, 6 ayes — 0 nays.
19. Discuss and act on RESOLUTION NO. 2024-040: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING TO
RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CITY'S PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX
RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND
PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Mr. Anderson said a public hearing on the proposed City tax rate was required by Chapter
26 of the Texas Tax Code, and a resolution calling for the public hearing on September 9 needed
to be approved.
Regular Council Meeting
August 26, 2024
Page 7
A Motion to approve this item was made by Council Member Moore and seconded by
Council Member Putnam. Motion carried, 6 ayes — 0 nays.
20. Consider and approve future events for City Council and/or City Staff pursuant to
Resolution No. 2004-081.
No future events were referenced.
21. Adjournment.
There being no further business, a Motion to adjourn was made by Mayor Pro -Tem
Savage and seconded by Council Member Norment. Motion carried, 6 ayes - 0 nays. Mayor
Pankaj adjourned the meeting at 6:58 p.m.
MIHIR PANKAJ, MAYOR
JANICE ELLIS, CITY CLERK
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
September 9, 2024
The City Council of the City of Paris met for a regular session at 5:30 p.m. on Monday,
September 9, 2024, at the City Council Chamber, 107 E. Kaufman, Paris, Texas.
Present: Mayor: Mihir Pankaj
Council Members: Shatara Moore, Mickey Ellis, Rebecca Norment,
Alix Putnam and Rudy Kessel
City Staff. Rob Vine, Interim City Manager; Stephanie Harris,
City Attorney; Janice Ellis, City Clerk; Gene
Anderson, Finance Director; Rich Salter, Police
Chief; M.A. Smith, Public Works Director; Osei
Amo-Mensah, City Planner; Thomas McMonigle,
Fire Chief; Tom Hunt, Municipal Judge; Todd
Mittge, City Engineer; Danny Rowell, Interim
Utilities Director; and Clyde Crews, Fire Marshal
Absent: Mayor Pro -Tem: Gary Savage
Opening Agenda
1. Call meeting to order.
Mayor Pankaj called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
2. Invocation.
Finance Director Gene Anderson gave the invocation.
3. United States Pledge of Allegiance & Texas Pledge of Allegiance.
City Council led the United States Pledge of Allegiance and the Texas Pledge of
Allegiance.
4. Citizens' Forum.
Danny Huff, 625 Beaver Creek Road — he expressed appreciation to City Council for the
kind words they had spoken about the employees and retirees. He especially thanked them for
the COLA for retirees and pay increase for police officers.
Tommy Haynes, 3095 Abbott Lane — he thanked City Council for restarting the COLA
for retirees.
Carolyn Williams, 44th Street S.W. — she said she had a problem with taxes increasing.
Regular Council Meeting
September 9, 2024
Page 2
Brian Brumley, Lamar County — he said he had 70 rental homes and thanked the Mayor
and others who helped him in getting trash issues resolved.
Consent Agenda
Mayor Pankaj inquired of Council Members if they wished to pull any items from the
consent agenda for discussion. There being none, a Motion to approve the consent agenda was
made by Council Member Moore and seconded by Council Member Norment. Motion carried,
6 ayes — 0 nays.
5. Approve minutes from the meetings of August 19, 2024 and August 22, 2024.
6. Receive reports and/or minutes from the following boards and commissions:
a. Paris Visitors and Convention Council (6-25-2024)
b. Board of Adjustment (7-2-2024)
7. Approve RESOLUTION NO. 2024-041: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, TO NAME THE CITY OF PARIS SPORTS
COMPLEX PICKLEBALL COURTS IN HONOR OF CITIZEN SUE HAYS;
MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Re alar A Benda
8. Receive an update from Garver about the construction and progress of the WWTP
Project.
Justin Rackley with Garver Engineering firm gave a presentation regarding the progress
of Phase I and Phase II of the Wastewater Treatment Plant improvements project. Mr. Rackley
began with the construction timelines for both Phase 1 and Phase 2. He said final completion
for Phase 1 was estimated for August 14, 2025, and estimated final completion for Phase 2 was
April 14, 2026. He depicted photographs and drawings of the pre -construction site, construction
phasing, proposed site overview, aeration basins, blower building, primary clarifiers, the MLSS
splitter, RAS/WAS pump station, final clarifiers, and the septage receiving and recycle flow
PUMP.
9. Conduct a public hearing on the advisability of the creation of the Forestbrook Public
Improvement District No. 1 and the proposed improvements to be constructed in such
District.
Interim City Manager Rob Vine explained that the resolution had been passed to accept
the PID creation petition, a professional services reimbursement agreement had been approved
and tonight was posted for a public hearing only. Mr. Vine said an ordinance approving issuance
and sale of Special Assessment Revenue Bonds and an Ordinance levying PID assessments and
approving a final service and assessment plan and related agreement would need to be approved
Regular Council Meeting
September 9, 2024
Page 3
at some time. He also said Staff recommended that the public hearing be opened and that it
remain open until a later date.
Mayor Pankaj opened the public hearing and continued the public hearing until a later
date.
10. Conduct a public hearing on the City's proposed tax rate for FY 2024-2025.
Finance Director Gene Anderson said a hearing on the proposed City tax rate was
required by Chapter 26 of the Texas Tax Code.
Mayor Pankaj opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak about
this item, to please come forward. With no one speaking, Mayor Pankaj closed the public
hearing.
11. Conduct a public hearing on the City Manager's proposed budget for FY 2024-2025.
Mr. Anderson said a public hearing on the proposed City budget was required by Section
48 of the City Charter and Section 102.006 of the Local Government Code.
Mayor Pankaj opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak about
this item, to please come forward. With no one speaking, Mayor Pankaj closed the public
hearing.
12. Discuss and act on ORDINANCE NO. 2024-029: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE
ENSUING FISCAL PERIOD BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2024 AND ENDING
SEPTEMBER 30, 2025, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARTER OF THE CITY
OF PARIS; APPROPRIATING THE VARIOUS AMOUNTS THEREOF; MAKING
OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT;
PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Mr. Anderson said the proposed FY2024-25 City budget was filed with he City Clerk on
August 12th and presented to the City Council on August 12d'. He also said on August 196 and
August 22"d, the City Council held budget workshops and discussed the proposed budget and
changes were made to the document. Mr. Anderson said the Ordinance summarized revenues
and expenses for all budgeted City funds and departments as amended by the City Council, and
provided for certain transfers to be made between various City funds.
Council Member Putnam asked if they could first review item 13. A Motion to move
item 13 up on the agenda was made by Council Member Putnam and seconded by Council
Member Norment. Motion carried, 6 ayes — 0 nays.
After discussing and voting on item 13, Mayor Pankaj redirected City Council to item
12. There being no further discussion on item 12, a Motion to approve this item was made by
Regular Council Meeting
September 9, 2024
Page 4
Council Member Kessel and seconded by Council Member Norment. Motion carried, 5 ayes —
1 nay, with Council Member Putnam casting the dissenting vote.
13. Discuss and act on ORDINANCE NO. 2024-030: AN ORDINANCE REGARDING
THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM BENEFITS
AND AUTHORIZING: (1) NON -RETROACTIVE REPEATING COLAS FOR
RETIREES AND THEIR BENEFICIARIES UNDER TMRS ACT §853.404(F) AND
(f-1); AND (2) ANNUALLY ACCRUING UPDATED SERVICE CREDITS.
Mr. Anderson said in 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance 2004-051 which
repealed the automatic granting of COLAs and employee Updated Service Credits (USC). He
also said in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, City Council granted COLAs and USCs. Council
Member Putnam expressed concern with approving these items because it would cost the City
1.1 million dollars. She said the police department increase was very much needed, and they
had another year to make a decision about the retiree COLA and the USC. Mayor Pankaj said
the COLA and the USC were both very much needed, citing the number of vacant positions at
the City. He said he believed it would be very beneficial in hiring and retaining employees, as
it would make the City more competitive.
A Motion to approve this item was made by Council Member Kessel and seconded by
Council Member Moore. Motion carried, 5 ayes — 1 nay, with Council Member Putnam casting
the dissenting vote.
Mayor Pankaj redirected City Council to item 12 for a vote.
14. Discuss and act on ORDINANCE NO. 2024-031: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, DISANNEXING PORTIONS OF
FOUR PARCELS OF PROPERTY EQUALING APPROXIMATELY 170 TOTAL
ACRES AND LOCATED ON OR AROUND COUNTY ROAD 22500 (LCAD#s 71112,
71113, 70422 and 70423) WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF PARIS
CONTINGENT UPON EXECUTION OF A DISANNEXATION AGREEMENT WITH
THE PETITIONER; APPROVING SAID DISANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAME; ADJUSTING CITY
BOUNDARIES OT REFLECT NEW CITY LIMITS; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS
AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; PROVIDING A REPEALER
CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
City Attorney Stephanie Harris reminded City Council that they had discussed this at two
previous Council meetings, and answered questions from City Council. Council Member
Norment said that she was pro-business but would never be for disannexation because it did not
help pro -growth inside the City limits. She also emphasized the fact that the State did not support
disannexation per Ms. Harris. Council Member Moore said she favored it because it would be
more tax dollars for Chisum ISD. Council Member Kessel said because of the corner property,
this property would not be developed for housing and he thought it was important to keep the
project moving. Council Member Putnam said she had received some history about
Regular Council Meeting
September 9, 2024
Page 5
disannexations from the City Attorney and this was the first time a company had requested for
disannexation from the City, and that she was not in favor of it. Council Member Putnam asked
Council to make sure to ear mark the $400,000.00 the company was paying to the City, if the
disannexation was approved so that the funds did not get lost. Mayor Pankaj said he was also
pro-business, and was in favor of this disannexation.
Subject to the disannexation agreement being executed by Nexus, a Motion to approve
this item was made by Council Member Moore and seconded by Council Member Kessel.
Motion carried, 4 ayes — 2 nays, with Council Members Norment and Putnam casting the
dissenting votes.
15. Discuss downtown trash ordinance, and provide direction to staff.
Mayor Pankaj said Council Member Norment placed this item on the agenda. Council
Member Norment said she understood that the City did not have an Ordinance addressing the
trash and trash bins downtown, and there was a lot of growth downtown. Mayor Pankaj said
they needed to take steps to make downtown beautiful and asked how Council wanted to move
forward. Council Member Norment suggested they form a committee and Council Member
Putnam volunteered to serve on the committee. Council Member Norment also suggested they
ask volunteers from the Paris Downtown Association. Mayor Pankaj said they may want to
involve Main Street Coordinator Cheri Bedford with regard to possibly doing a survey.
16. Receive presentation about a PEG Channel, discuss and provide direction to City Staff.
Public Information Officer Jon McFadden explained that prior to 2005, Texas cities could
issue franchise agreements to wire -based cable television. He said subsequently Senate Bill 5
created Chapter 66 of the Texas Utilities Code, providing a State issued cable and void franchise
agreement and ending local CATV franchises. Mr. McFadden explained that Chapter 66
addressed Public, Educational Government (PEG) channels provided on a CATV system, and
Municipal PEG channels offered televised meetings, videos about services, emergency
information and bulletin board content. Mr. McFadden reported that after Chapter 66 took effect
and existing local franchise agreements expired, Texas cities could choose to accept a 1% PEG
and Paris chose to do so. Mr. McFadden explained capital costs for operation of a PEG channel,
and that the City must utilize the channel for at least eight hours daily, or the cable system could
reclaim the channel for other programming. He said there was no cost for the use of a channel
for PEG programming. Mr. McFadden reported that as of September 3, 2024, the PEG fund
contained $865,231. Mr. McFadden said the PEG channel would improve the City's ability to
share information with citizens, particularly adults 65 and up. He said a PEG channel would be
another tool for sharing information and could reach many people who were not internet or social
media users. He also said equipment purchased for PEG could be used for other purposes when
not in use for PEG programming.
It was a consensus of City Council that Mr. McFadden move forward with establishing
a PEG Channel and bringing back a channel use agreement.
Regular Council Meeting
September 9, 2024
Page 6
17. Consider and approve future events for City Council and/or City Staff pursuant to
Resolution No. 2004-081.
Mayor Pankaj reminded Council of the short meeting scheduled for Tuesday at 5:30 p.m.
18. Adjournment.
There being no further business, a Motion to adjourn was made by Council Member Ellis
and seconded by Council Member Norment. Motion carried, 6 ayes - 0 nays. Mayor Pankaj
adjourned the meeting at 6:36 p.m.
MIHIR PANKAJ, MAYOR
JANICE ELLIS, CITY CLERK
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
September 10, 2024
The City Council of the City of Paris met for a special session at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday,
September 10, 2024, held at the City Council Chamber, 107 E. Kaufman, Paris, Texas.
Present: Mayor: Mihir Pankaj
Mayor Pro -Tem: Gary Savage
Council Members: Mickey Ellis, Rebecca Norment, and Alix Putnam
City Staff: Rob Vine, Interim City Manager; Gene Anderson,
Finance Director; Skylar Unger, Deputy City
Clerk; M.A. Smith, Public Works Director; Osei
Amo-Mensah, City Planner; and Danny Rowell,
Interim Utilities Director
Absent: Council Member: Rudy Kessel
1. Call meeting to order.
Mayor Pankaj called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Mr. Anderson gave the invocation
and City Council led the United States Pledge and the Texas Pledge.
2. Citizens' Forum.
No one spoke during Citizens' Forum.
3. Discuss and ratify the property tax increase reflected in the budget as required by Chapter
26 of the Texas Tax Code.
Finance Director Gene Anderson said pursuant to Local Government Code Section
102.007(c), the City Council was required to take a separate vote to ratify any property tax
increase reflected in the 2024-2025 Budget. He said the 2024-25 Budget would raise
$636,414.00 more in property tax revenue than last year and that $159,347.00 of this amount
comes from property taxes on new property.
A Moton to ratify the property tax increase was made by Mayor Pro -Tem Savage and
seconded by Council Member Moore. Those voting in favor were Mayor Pankaj, Mayor Pro -
Tem Savage, Council Member Ellis, and Council Member Norment. Council Member Putnam
voted against this item. Motion caried, 5 ayes — 1 nay.
4. Discuss and act on ORDINANCE NO. 2024-032: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, FIXING THE TAX RATE AND THE
TAX LEVY AND LEVYING AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE CITY OF PARIS
FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2024 UPON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN
September 10, 20
Pagel
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS
RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF
ORDINANCES
■ HEREWITH; PROVING
�.. SAVINGS
♦ '..
PROVIDING!♦ SEVERABILITY♦ AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
I]'
#.!!' . ..Y.' # �# / •' �� 1,.1 # . #'.. 1 �� �, . !, 1 *sass* � '
! r # ! • # - ' : ! 111. !' 1 ! - ! !' ', ! 11 ! .
FundsInterest & Sinking # debt payments
A Motion that the property tax rate be increased by the adoption of a tax rate of $0.46120
effectively a 5.71 percent ease in the tax rate was .#- by !Member-
againstseconded by Council Member Ellis. Those voting in favor were Mayor Pankaj, Mayor Pro -Tem
Savage, Council Member Ellis, and Council Member Norment. Council Member Putnam voted
!' # '!
There being no further business, a Motion to adjourn was made by Mayor Pro -Tem
Savage and seconded by CouncilR." Moore. Motioncarried,1 nays.
Mayor R... sass. •.
adjourned the meeting at 5:38 p.m.
SKYLAR UNGER, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Item No. 6
S
R,,�vlAs,,I
T A
ECONOMIC DEVNLOPMENTCORPOPAMN
Where i`exans Reach hlig,ler
PARIS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
MONTHLY MEETING
Paris City Council Chambers
107 East Kaufman St.
Paris, Texas 75460
Tuesday, June 25, 2024
5:30 P.M.
MINUTES
Board Members Present:
Josh Bray, Chairman
Curtis Fendley, Vice Chairman
Chase Coleman, Secretary/Treasurer
Erik Roddy
Ex -Officio Members Present:
Mihir Pankaj, Mayor
Grayson Path, City Manager
Dr Stephen Benson, PJC President
Staff Present:
Maureen Hammond, Executive Director
Adam Cawthon, Executive Assistant
Jenna Thurman, Research Assistant
Legal Council:
Casey Gain, PEDCAttorney
Guest(s) Present:
Doug Harris, Assistant City Manager
Reginald Hughes, Former Mayor
Paul Strahan, Cox Air Field
Erik Simien, Cong. Pat Fallon's Office
Call to Order
Chairman Josh Bray called the monthly board meeting of the Paris Economic Development Corporation
to order at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 25, 2024,
Invocation
Mr. Roddy gave the invocation.
Welcome and O enirr Remarks,
Chairman Bray opened by expressing appreciation to everyone in attendance. Mr. Bray reminded the
Board that the July PEDC Board Meeting had been canceled and that any business needing to be
conducted would be handled at the July 12th PEDC Planning Meeting.
Citizens' Input
Chairman Bray invited those present to speak during the Citizens' Input. No one came forward, and
Chairman Bray closed citizens' input.
Page 1 of 5
.... , .�.� ,� k -, �.; �,. "� � �.' C C � � �,m�,� :�.�'. ,� V ,� ;�� „, m'tun � ., � ,� , � dGnw n>a"" '�.�..., �f nus✓ nyn ,.. �"' � � 1 I>' ���%�//,,,,¢..
f
f
ECONtlMIC OL'V�IOPidENT CORPORATION
Where 'reXanS Read! Higher
Recognition of Former Ma or Re inald Hu hes
Former Mayor Reginald Hughes was presented awards for his service to the City of Paris and support of
the Paris Economic Development Corporation by Erik Simien of Congressman Pat Fallon's office and by
Executive Director Maureen Hammond.
Discuss and Consider A.pproval of the April 16 2024 Meeting Minutes,
Chairman Bray presented the April 16, 2024, meeting minutes for review and discussion.
Mr. Fendley made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Mr. Coleman seconded the motion.
Vote: 4 -ayes to 0 -nays
Discuss and Consider A1arovalof the Ma 1� 3 2024 Seecial Meeting Minutes
Chairman Bray presented the May 13, 2024, special meeting minutes for review and discussion.
Mr. Fendley made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Mr. Coleman seconded the motion.
Vote: 4 -ayes to 0 -nays
Discuss and Consider Arrroval of the A aril 2024 Financial Statements
Secretary and Treasurer Chase Coleman presented the financial reports ending April 30, 2024. Total
assets were reported to be $10,184,025. Total liabilities were reported to be $2,173,624, leaving the
PEDC with a total net position of $8,010,401. Mr. Coleman continued with the income statement for the
month of April, citing the reported total revenue as $183,114.
Mr. Coleman proceeded by presenting total expenditures and net income for the month. He concluded
this portion of the report by stating that the PEDC continues to have an exceptional year for revenue
and that there were no extraordinary expenses for April.
Mr. Coleman opened the floor to questions regarding the April financial report. There were no
questions.
Mr. Bray took a motion to approve the April financial report. Mr. Fendley made a motion to approve the
financial report as presented. Mr. Roddy seconded the motion.
Vote: 4 -ayes to 0 -nays
Presentation b Paul Strahan on Cox Field Air ort
Airport Manager Paul Strahan opened his presentation on Cox Field Airport with a review of the status
of the airport. He stated that the airport is projected to begin a 120 day runway construction project in
early July 2024 and construction of a new fuel farm is projected to begin in fiscal year 2025.
Mr. Strahan continued his presentation, stating that future visions for the airport include construction of
new airfield lighting, additional taxi lanes, and additional aircraft T -hangers and private hangars. He
noted that acquiring funding from TxDCT for these projects continues to be a challenge, and that the
average timeline for each project is 3 to 5 years.
4
Mr. Strahan concluded his presentation by noting future opportunities for the airport, which include a
rental car service, cargo operations, updates to the aircraft repair shop, addition of an avionics shop,
and a restaurant on site.
Page 2 of 5
BRIS
TEXAS
.A.MIC DEVELOPMENT COnPORATION
Where Texans Reach Highee
Mr. Strahan opened the floor to questions regarding the presentation on Cox Field Airport. Ms.
Hammond asked what portion of the 1,600 acre airport currently has infrastructure. Mr. Strahan
provided response, stating that of the 1,600 acres of airport property, less than 200 acres have
infrastructure and that creating infrastructure throughout the property continues to be a challenge. Ms.
Hammond asked a question regarding the size of the airport in relation to other airports in the state of
Texas. Mr. Strahan provided response, noting that the size of the Cox Field Airport is larger than the
average airport in Texas. Mr. Bray asked a question regarding the ability to land aircraft at the airport
during the runway construction project and if notice would be provided. Mr. Strahan provided response,
stating that a notice would be provided for pilots prior to construction. There were no further questions.
Presentation bv Dow Harris on the Wastewater Treatment Facilit
Assistant City Manager Doug Harris opened his presentation on the Wastewater Treatment Facility by
providing a brief history of the facility. He explained that two construction packages are currently in
progress and have been divided due to funding. Mr. Harris elaborated on construction package one,
stating that construction began in Spring of 2023 and is estimated to conclude in April 2025. He
continued, noting that package two is scheduled to begin construction on August 22, 2024 and
estimated to conclude in April 2026. Mr. Harris provided clarification, stating that package one is
focused on construction at the water treatment facility and package two is focused on the influent line
to the treatment facility.
Mr. Harris continued the presentation by recalling a commonly asked question regarding the additional
capacity available for potential industries, to which he noted is approximately 1.5M gallons per day. He
elaborated, stating that the current daily average is 3.9M GPD and that the treatment facility has a
permitted maximum capacity of 7.25M GPD. Mr. Harris further explained that should the average daily
capacity reach 75% of the facility's permitted maximum capacity for three consecutive months, the City
of Paris would be required to begin engineering design and allocating funding for upgrades to the
treatment facility.
Mr. Harris concluded the presentation with a second commonly asked question regarding pretreatment
requirements for industries, which he noted is regulated at a federal level. He added that an industry
could either install a pretreatment center at its facility or send untreated water to the City of Paris
facility, which would be subject to a surcharge for treatment.
Mr. Harris opened the floor to questions regarding the presentation on the Wastewater Treatment
Facility. Mr. Bray asked a question regarding the water line capacity to industries and whether water line
improvements or facility improvements would be required to increase capacity. Mr. Harris provided
response, stating that the current water lines are in poor condition and that construction package two is
focused on addressing this issue. Mr. Bray asked an additional question regarding the amount of
additional capacity that will be available after the completion of construction. Mr. Harris provided
response, stating that completion of construction is projected to increase additional capacity beyond the
current estimated 1.5M GPD, however it will not exceed the 7.25M GPD permitted maximum capacity of
the facility. There were no further questions.
Update and Discussion on 2024-2025 Draft Bud et
Ms. Hammond presented the preliminary 2024-2025 Draft PEDC Budget. She noted that the Budget
would be presented to the board for approval during the July 12, 2024 PEDC Planning Session, and that
all feedback on the preliminary draft would be collected through early July.
Page 3 of 5
INNZZ===Z'
,"' fi
S T E X A S
R,Aaa' R
-11 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Where Texans ReaCh Higher
Chairman Bray opened the floor to questions regarding the 2024-2025 Draft Budget. There were no
questions.
Update and Discussion on 2023-2025 PEDC Plan of Work
Ms. Hammond presented the preliminary 2023-2025 PEDC Plan of Work, reminding the Board that in
accordance with the PEDC Bylaws, the PEDC is required to submit a plan of work alongside the 2024-
2025 budget. She expressed that no action would be taken at this meeting and requested that all board
members review the Plan of Work and provide feedback prior to the July 12, 2024, PEDC Planning
Session. She concluded by noting that the 2023-2025 Plan of Work would be presented to the board for
approval during the Planning Session.
Chairman Bray opened the floor to questions regarding the 2023-2025 Plan of Work. There were no
questions.
Report and Updates by -Executive Director Maureen Hammond
NW Industrial Park EDA Grant: Ms. Hammond noted that weather had been more favorable recently,
allowing contractors to make considerable progress on construction. She presented aerial views of
current construction in the NW Industrial Park, stating that forms are projected to be set on all areas in
the coming weeks.
Paris Housing Market Analysis 2023: Ms. Hammond reported that Catalyst Commercial had completed
the housing market analysis. She noted that a presentation of the analysis would be presented to City
Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission during a joint workshop scheduled for July 11, 2024.
TIRZ Zone 1: Ms. Hammond reported that during a previous TIRZ meeting in June, the advisory board
took action to appoint a subcommittee to move forward with engaging a TIRZ consultant. She concluded
by noting that the PEDC Board would be informed as the process moves forward.
Mr. Bray opened the floor to questions regarding the report and updates by Executive Director Maureen
Hammond. There were no questions.
Convene into Executive Session:
1) Pursuant to Section 551.087 of the Texas Government Code to (1) discuss or deliberate
regarding commercial or financial information that the governmental body has received
from a business prospect that the governmental body seeks to have to locate, stay, or
expand in or near the territory of the governmental body and with which the governmental
body is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) to deliberate the offer of a
financial or another incentive to a business prospect described by Subdivision (1), to wit:
a) Project Lightening
b) Project Blue Fire
c) Project Clydesdale
Page 4 of 5
NMI
���i��YIiIi " m Y =if
' p�� ^., � 4� ��� _ <, � f �, � o � �o� . f ii 1� i 5! U
i(j �d IIlfil�„09
i TEXAS
• '"'�`� ONOMICOEVE4OPMENY CORPORATION
here Texans Reach 1.1tgl'90
2) Pursuant to Section 551.072 of the Texas Government Code to discuss and deliberate the
purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property.
Chairman Bray convened the Board into Executive Session at 6:11 p.m.
Reconvene into O en Session and Consider Action on Items Discussed in the Executive Session
Chairman Bray reconvened the Board into an Open Session at 6:27 p.m.
Chairman Bray took a motion to approve items discussed in Executive Session. Mr. Fendley made a
motion to allow Ms. Hammond authorization to enter negotiations and execute all agreements with
Atmos Energy regarding the contract discussed in Executive Session. Mr. Coleman seconded the motion.
Vote: 4 -ayes 0 -nays
Discuss Future A enda Items
Chairman Bray opened the floor to discuss future agenda items. No items were brought forward for
discussion.
Closin Remarks,
None
Adiourn
Mr. Fendley made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Coleman seconded the motion.
Vote: 4 -ayes to 0 -nays
Chairman Bray declared the meeting adjourned.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:27 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Zrl
Adam Cawthon
Executive Assistant
Paris Economic Development Corporation
Page 5 of 5
i
TEXAS
.��� ECpHtlMlG Df:bEtOPiAEWY CORPORATION
Where 7i?xans Reach Iligher
PARIS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BOARD PLANNING SESSION
Paris City Council Chambers
107 East Kaufman St.
Paris, Texas 75460
Friday, July 12, 2024
11:00 A.M.
MINUTES
Board Members Present: Staff Present:
Josh Bray, Chairman Maureen Hammond, Executive Director
Curtis Fendley, Vice Chairman
Chase Coleman, Secretary/Treasurer
Dr A.J. Hashmi
Stephen Terrell
Erik Roddy
Mark Homer
Ex -Officio Members Present:
Mihir Pankaj, Mayor
Legal Council:
Casey Gain, PEDCAttorney
Adam Cawthon, Executive Assistant
Jenna Thurman, Research Assistant
Guest(s) Present:
Robert Vine, Interim City Manager
Doug Harris, Assistant City Manager
Shatara Moore, Council Member
Alix Putnam, Council Member
Rudy Kessel, Council Member
Call to Order
Chairman Josh Bray called the board planning session of the Paris Economic Development Corporation
to order at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, July 12, 2024.
Welcome and O enin Remarks
Chairman Bray opened by expressing appreciation to everyone in attendance, including City Council and
Staff.
Page 1 of 5
0 ENZE-=11 Y1"i
11M.ISM
Yrl
^^'^°'� ECONOYA�C OEVEiO�MENY CORPORATION
where Texans Reach digger
Citizens' Input
Chairman Bray invited those present to speak during the Citizens' Input. No one came forward, and
Chairman Bray closed citizens' input.
Discuss and Action on 2024-2025 PEDC Budgets
Mr. Coleman presented the proposed 2024-2025 PEDC Budgets. Proposed revenue included $1.8 million
in sales tax and $150,000 in interest income. He reported a total estimated income of $1,950,000.
Mr. Coleman continued by reporting on expenses. Most budget expenses remained the same or had
slight increases or decreases. Total proposed budget expenses for 2024-2025 were reported at
$3,365,095.00 in comparison to last year's budgeted amount of $2,254,208.64. Mr. Coleman noted that
the increase was primarily due to the addition of incentive obligations for Project Blue Fire.
Mr. Roddy made a motion to approve the proposed 2024-2025 Budgets. Mr. Terrell seconded the
motion.
Vote: 7 -ayes to 0 -nays
Discuss and Action on 2023-2025 PEDC Plan of Work
Ms. Hammond Reported on the 2023-2025 PEDC Plan of Work.
Mr. Homer made a motion to approve the 2023-2025 Plan of Work. Mr. Fendley seconded the motion.
Vote: 7 -ayes to 0 -nays
Discussion on O en Meetin sand Records Protocol b Cit Attorne Ste hanie Harris Cit of Paris
Ms. Harris was unable to attend the meeting. Discussion on Open Meeting and Records Protocol was
tabled for a later date.
Overview of Plan of Work Accomplishments 2020 — 2024 b Executive Director Maureen Hammond
Ms. Hammond provided a presentation and review of the PEDC's Plan of Work accomplishments
spanning the last four years. This presentation included a list of initiatives encompassing the retention
and growth of jobs in Lamar County, the attraction of new employers and industry, the cultivation of an
entrepreneurial ecosystem, support of workforce development programs, expansion of the community's
land and building assets, the encouragement of a unified vision for the City of Paris, Lamar County, and
the PEDC, and the exploration of additional internal and external funding mechanisms.
Key highlights included the followin
• Launched a new unified joint brand in partnership with the City and Chamber of Commerce
• Established a formal site visitation program in partnership with PJC and surveyed employers
representing 4,300 employees
• Developed and launched a new website
• Acquired 123 -site on Loop 286 for non -rail users
Page 2 of 5
loffm=11 1I�.�(I�� � I�..o...�.. n�i� �•rY„��� �it w; � � U 1ITIMI. �^^� /IdblNil Oi�� �Ufl 1 wY a mp � � �Ppp, �( �� l kky j u"�IU�1��^�V� �k�; 0�I �.1...... �y� �, �..ri/�I��+t��lfliyrl��Vi��,.1�. �� ���U�Mdio��i�M7�l����*If��l% ��r�������I/�j����I /%�'�%�����/////%,
X iI i I'����1 �1fN19�pNiii llt llfi11111'i 4/llJ1!!'�%i% t
�1N3�ARIS TEXAS
....a!�CIONOINIC DBVHLd PMENT CORPORATION
Where Texans Reach l-li h�.v
• Acquired 200 -acre site on Loop 286 with potential for rail
• Rezoned and performed Phase I environmentals on all properties
• Developed and implemented a new social media marketing strategy
• Developed and implemented quarterly newsletters
• Secured $1.3 million in federal funding through the Economic Development Administration
• Partnered with the City to get 12 -inch waterlines to both industrial parks
• Supported 13 project announcements representing:
o Retention of 585 jobs
o the creation of 835 new jobs
o $423 million in capital investment to Paris and Lamar County
o Total jobs supported = 1,410
Hammond expressed her gratitude to the Board for their ongoing support, dedication, and commitment
of time to both her and the organization.
Discussion and Possible Action on Financial Position and Forecastin& b ;,Secretary Treasurer Coleman
Mr. Coleman presented the financial position and forecasting of the PEDC. Following his presentation,
Mr. Coleman provided commentary, stating that over the past four years, the organization has achieved
significant milestones, including the announcement of 13 projects, land acquisitions, and expenditures
to prepare properties to be site ready. However, these efforts, combined with Project Blue Fire, will
place considerable strain on cash flow for the next five to seven years. This limited cash availability will
greatly impede the organization's ability to actively pursue new projects, make land acquisitions, and
implement capital improvements within its existing industrial parks.
OverviewDiscussion and Possible Action on Land and !Aildin s includin but not limited to:
11
Ms. Hammond presented an overview of the PEDC land inventory and noted the following challenges:
20 -acre site on West Campbell St
• A large amount of clearing is necessary.
• The water main serving the site is 6 inches and may not be suitable for industries with high
water demand.
• The land is adjacent to a residential area.
40 -acre site at NW Industrial Park
• A minor floodplain running through the center of the property could restrict development.
• A flood study is needed for the site.
115 -acre site at Gene Stallings Business Park
• No onsite sewer is available.
• Rehabilitation and construction of a new rail system is required.
Page 3 of 5
P":"I:i, oe,1 , I , I' V�I��fUNNUUIII .,.I E X /\IS
ECONOMIC OEVEIOIPMENT CORPORATION
Where Texans ReaCh Higher
200 -acre site at SW Industrial Park
• No onsite sewer is available.
Rehabilitation and construction of a new rail system is required.
An existing blue -line stream flows north to south through the property. The property is not
considered a FEMA floodplain; however, the property is a USACE jurisdiction for wetlands and
waters. A USACE permit is achievable for certain uses.
123 -acre site on SE Loop 286
• Nearest water line is a 6 inch line northwest of the site. The nearest 10 inch water line is east of
the property, at the intersection of Loop 286 and Collegiate Drive.
• No onsite sewer is available.
• Timeframe for the implementation by TxDOT of a 4 -lane expansion to Loop 286 South is
potentially 10 or more years.
Initial utility costs for water and sewage are expected to be significant.
PEDC Board Member Roundtable and Discussion
Ms. Hammond continued with a point of discussion involving the challenges of Cox Field Airport. She
noted that while the most valuable asset of the airport is the availability of land, its lack of infrastructure
continues to be a challenge. Ms. Hammond provided an example, stating that the PEDC was unable to
submit on a recent request for information due to the lack of infrastructure and length of its primary
runway. She further explained that the timeframe to secure approval from the FAA to proceed with
infrastructure improvements is approximately three years. Mr. Bray reiterated Hammond's remarks
stating that infrastructure improvements and FAA approval is a critical need in preparing the land for
potential industries. Mr. Homer asked a question regarding the steps needed to begin the approval
process. Mr. Vine provided response, stating that a master plan to extend the runway would need to be
drafted prior to the submittal for FAA approval. Mr. Roddy provided commentary, noting that
infrastructure improvements to the property should be the primary focus. Mr. Roddy asked a question
regarding the ability to connect water lines to the City of Reno's water supply. Mr. Harris provided
response, explaining that water lines connected to the Lamar County Water Supply currently surround
the property.
Dr. Hashmi continued with another point of discussion involving the percentage of sales tax revenue the
PEDC receives. He noted that an additional quarter cent of sales tax revenue would allow the PEDC to
continue its core mission and allow for improvements for potential industries, in light of the
organization's current financial constraints. Mr. Fendley added that it could also be designated to
acquiring land either by the City or PEDC for industrial use or be allocated to the prioritization of PEDC
industrial projects and improvements. Mr. Bray added that improvements to the highways and signage
leading into the city of Paris are also needed to increase the city's appeal to potential industries.
Mr. Bray asked Mr. Pankaj to facilitate a discussion with the Paris City Council about the potential
reallocation of tax dollars and to reconvene with the PEDC Board at a later date. In response, Mr. Pankaj
agreed to begin discussions with the council and coordinate a joint meeting.
Page 4 of 5
"is TEXAS
� CONOMICDEVELOPM9NTCOAPORAT90N
where-rexnns Reach Higher
Mr. Bray opened the floor to discussion regarding the future direction of the PEDC.
Mr. Bray noted that as lead generation slows and cash flow becomes tighter, the PEDC may want to
broaden its focus to include areas such as entrepreneurship. Mr. Homer emphasized that prioritizing the
retention and expansion of existing industries should remain a key goal for the PEDC. Mr. Fendley
echoed Mr. Homer's sentiment, reinforcing the importance of business retention and expansion efforts.
Mr. Roddy suggested that the PEDC's focus could be expanded to a more regional approach to attract a
bigger workforce. Mr. Terrell mentioned that constructing a speculative building and a new PEDC office
could help attract investors to the area. He also proposed that the PEDC consider marketing beyond
Lamar County, highlighting that a broader outreach could bring in additional talent and industry.
Furthermore, Mr. Terrell pointed out that the City of Paris and Lamar County could enhance the overall
appeal of the city's entrances, citing the importance of regularly maintaining traffic medians as an
example. Mr. Coleman stressed the necessity for improved infrastructure on PEDC properties in
anticipation of future economic growth. Lastly, Dr. Hashmi referred back to points he made in earlier
discussions.
Ms. Hammond thanked all in attendance for their input and expressed her excitement for the upcoming
year.
Mr. Bray closed roundtable discussions by thanking Ms. Hammond for her continued support of
economic development during the last four years.
Adlourn
Chairman Bray declared the meeting adjourned.
The meeting was adjourned at 1:24 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Adam Cawthon
Executive Assistant
Paris Economic Development Corporation
Page 5 of 5
=MZZ
��� .� II �� �.. � �, ,�, O, �� O � "� � � .� i �cf6� ,M� ''4ry•..:'1r� �a�ilr (� ��� � � ���i��//i;;,
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
AUGUST 05, 2024
The Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Paris.held a regular meeting at 5:30 p.m, in the
City Hall, Council Chambers, 107 East Kaufman, Paris, Texas.
Board Members Present: Adam Bolton, Chance Abbott, Clifton Fendiey, Tylesha
Ross -Mosley, Larry Walker, Robert Spain, Chad Lindsey
City Representatives: Osei Amo-Mensah, Director Planning & Community
Development; Triniti Frazier, Community Development
Coordinator, Steve Hodges, Engineer Tech; Clyde Crews,
Fire Marshal; Stephanie Harris, City Attorney; Robert Vine,
Interim City Manager
Board Member(s) Absent: N/A
1. Chairman Clifton Fendley call the meeting to order at 5:30p.m.
2. Citizens' forum.
(Persons desiring to address the Planning and Zoning Commission must limit their presentation to no more than two
minutes. Unless an item is posted on the Agenda, the Texas Open Meetings Act prohibits the Commission from
responding to any comments other than to refer the matter to a future agenda, to an existing policy, or to a staff person
with specific factual information. Claims agamstthe City, Council Members, or employees, as well as individual personal
appeals are not appropriate for the citizens' forum.)
The citizens' forum was declared open.
3. Approve minutes from the meeting of July 15, 2024.
A Motion to approve the minutes was made by Board Member Adam Bolton and seconded
by Board Member Chance Abbott. Motion carried, 7 ayes — 0 nays.
4. Conduct a public hearing to consider and take action regarding the petition of Deanna Griffin
on behalf of Nathan Bell Property Management & Rentals, LLC in conjunction with TM&D
LLC for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) Mixed Use in a Neighborhood Service District (NS), in
the Simpson Place Addition, Lot 1, LCAD 17543, located at 2031 Clarksville Street.
Mr. Amo-Mensah presented this item stating that the applicant is seeking a SUP to operate a
business part-time with tenant use of the property as temporary housing. The property owner
has granted the applicant permission to occupy the property for live/work subject to City
approval. The current zoning is Neighborhood Service, and the property has been used for
various businesses. Building and Fire staff have worked with the applicant to meet the
requirements of the Building and Fire codes in reference to the live/work SUP application.
One input form was received in favor of the use. Staff recommends approval with the
condition that the interior fire wall separations and/or fire sprinkler system improvement be
made in satisfaction of the Building Official and Fire Marshal prior to issuance of Certificate
of Occupancy.
The public hearing was declared open. Nathan Bell states the tenant operates in Sherman
and other places. When she comes to Paris, she needs a place for work and temporary
housing. Bell states he is already receiving calls from citizens that want this item
approved. With no one speaking the public hearing was declared closed.
A Motion to approve the specific use permit with conditions was made by Board Member
Chad Lindsey and seconded by Board Member Adam Bolton. Motion carried, 7 ayes — 0
nays.
5. Conduct a public hearing to consider and take action regarding the petition of the City of
Paris to rezone the Historic Overlay District No. 2 (HD -2) which includes the following
districts: Central Area (CA), Two -Family Dwelling District (2F), Multiple -Family. Dwelling
District No. 1 (MF -1), Planned Development (PD) and Commercial District (C) to a Single -
Family Dwelling District No. I (SF -1).
Mr. Amo-Mensah presented this item stating that at the City Council meeting held on June
10a' during citizen's forum that Curtis Fendley and Linda Knox requested that city council
consider a change to restrict building permits for multi -family dwellings in the Historic
District of South Main and Church Streets. Staff was directed to review and report to Council
about the concerns raised by residents on Church Street. Amer hearing the report from staff,
City Council directed the case to P&Z at its June 24, meeting to consider rezoning the entire
Historic Overlay District No. 2 (HD -2) to a One -Family Dwelling District No. 1 (SF -1). Mr.
Amo-Mensah states that the issue before the Commission is to determine whether to rezone
just the Church Street area between Sherman and Long Street to prevent duplexes or multi-
family development or should the boundary cover the entire HD -2 Historic District as
requested. Arno-Mensah states that staff would like the opportunity to hold a neighborhood
stakeholder meeting so we can come back to P&Z with the proper boundaries for rezoning.
The public hearing was declared open. With no one speaking the public hearing was
declared closed. Commissioners discussed. Attorney Harris states it doesn't seem
appropriate to rezone the entire historic district and come back with something more targeted.
The alternative is to pass the petition to approve the zoning of the entire district and
everything there will be a legal nonconforming use. Abbott states if the item is denied then an
applicant can come in tomorrow to develop a duplex. Lindsey asked if a moratorium can be
put into place while this is figured out. Harris states those are disfavored and that you would
have to make findings that it is related to insufficient infrastructure for development.
Commissioners agreed that rezoning the entire HD -2 District to SF at this time as to prevent
any applications for duplex or multi -family until staff can review further and hold
stakeholder meetings for input on creating a different boundary. Harris states this is not best
practice, but it would allow staff more time to review and get the stakeholder meetings
scheduled.
A Motion to approve the zoning change to SF -1 as presented for the entire HD -2 District
was made by Board Member Larry Walker and seconded by Board Member Robert
Spain. Motion carried, 7 ayes.— 0
6. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat of the Josue Hernandez Addition CB
133, Lots 1 and 2, Block A, LCAD 16170 and 16172, located in the 900 Block of W
Sherman.
Steve Hodges presented this item stating the applicant requests approval of a Preliminary plat
in order to build a single-family structure. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat
with the following conditions:
1. The submission to and tentative approval of a preliminary plat by the Commission
shall be a condition precedent to the preparation of a final plat. Chapter 9A, V Final
Plat:
a. Any conditions of approval for the preliminary plat and master plat shall be
revised before final approval of final plat.
2. All land, buildings, or structures located within the City of Paris, Texas, shall be
used, placed, and erected in conformance within the zoning regulations prescribed for
the zoning district in which such land or building is located... Chapter 9B, 7:
Compliance Required:
a. Zoning for affected plats shall be corrected or rezoned. Existing zoning is
shown as MF -2 on this plat but is currently zoned MF -1 and SF -3.
Skipper Steeley from the audience asked if he could speak on this item. Commissioner
Fendley advised there is no public hearing on this item.
A Motion to approve the preliminary plat with conditions was made by Board Member Chad
Lindsey and seconded by Board Member Adam Bolton. Motion carried, 7 ayes — 0 nays.
7. Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of the Josue Hernandez Addition CB 133, Lots
I and 2, Block A, LCAD 16170 and 16172, located in the 900 Block of W Sherman.
Steve Hodges states this is the same plat with same conditions to finalize.
A Motion to approve the final plat with conditions was made by Board Member Chad
Lindsey and seconded by Board Member Adam Bolton. Motion carried, 7 ayes — 0 nays.
8. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat of the Ricardo Ramirez Estates Addition,
Lot 1, LCAD 15973, located at 610 W Austin.
Steve Hodges the applicant requests approval of a Preliminary plat to build a single-family
structure. This was a non -platted City Lot and Block parcel. Staff recommends approval with
no conditions.
A Motion to approve the preliminary plat was made by Board Member Chad Lindsey and
seconded by Board Member Tylesha Ross -Mosley. Motion carried; 7 ayes — 0 nays.
9. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat of the River Oaks Subdivision Phase II,
Lots 1, 2, 3, Block A, LCAD 403262 and 104885, located in the 3000.Block of Aikin Dr.
Steve Hodges states that the applicant requests approval of a preliminary plat in order to
build single-family structures. This is the Second Phase of a previous Subdivision. Staff
recommends approval with no conditions.
A Motion to approve the preliminary plat with conditions was made by Board Member
Chad Lindsey and seconded by Board Member Adam Bolton. Motion carried, 7 ayes — 0
nays.
10. Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of the Martinez Addition CB 53, Lot 1, LCAD
14244, located at 373 NW 5"'.
Steve Hodges states the applicant requests approval of a final plat in order to build a single-
family structure. This was a non -platted City Lot and Block. Staff recommends approval of
the final plat with the following conditions:
1. The submission to and tentative approval of a preliminary plat by the Commission
shall be a condition precedent to the preparation of a final plat. Chapter 9A, V Final
Plat: a. Any conditions of approval for the preliminary plat and master plat shall be
revised before final approval of final plat.
2. The number of lots and blocks, in accordance with a systematic arrangement....
Chapter 9A, V Final Plat, subsection 5. a. Lot and block shall be shown on the plat.
Lot I Block A is recommended for this plat.
3. Location of proposed lots, streets, alleys...., Minimum finished floor elevations for
each lot.... Chapter 9A, V Final Plat, Subsection 8. a. Minimum Finished Floor
Elevation of the proposed structure shall be shown on the final plat.
A Motion to approve the final plat was made by Board Member Chad Lindsey and
seconded by Board Member Adam Bolton. Motion carried, 7 ayes — 0 nays.
11. Request items for future agendas.
Commissioners discussed and agreed to reschedule the orientation and training. Due to
the Labor Day holiday being Monday Commissioners agreed to meet on Thursday,
September 05, 2024, for the regular meeting with orientation and training to follow.
12. Adjournment.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:10 p.m.
APPROVED THE 5th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024.
Chairperson
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING FOR
TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE TIRZ BOARD
PARIS TEXAS
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 107 E. KAUFMAN ST PARIS TEXAS
THURSDAY., AUGUST 8 2024
3:00 O'CLOCK P.M.
Members present: Cody Head, Chairman; Thomas McMonigle, Secretary; Maureen
Hammond, Reeves Hayter, Miles Mathieu, and Pam Norwood
Members absent: Dillon Cecil
City Staff: Rob Vine, Interim City Manager; Osei Amo-Mensah, Director of
Planning and Community Development; Skylar Unger, Deputy City
Clerk; and Cheri Bedford, Main Street Coordinator
1. Call meeting to order.
Chairman Cody Head called the meeting to order at 3:00 P.M.
2. Citizens' input.
No one came forward during citizens' input.
3. Approve minutes from the meeting on July 11, 2024.
A Motion to approve the minutes as presented was made by Ms. Hammond and seconded by Mr.
McMonigle. Motion carried 6 ayes — 0 nays.
4. Accept resignation of Rob Vine from the Board of Directors.
Chairman Head thanked Mr. Vine for his Board service and expressed enthusiasm about working with
him as Interim City Manager.
A Motion to accept the resignation of Rob Vine from the Board of Directors was made by Mr.
McMonigle and seconded by Mr. Hayter. Motion carried 6 ayes — 0 nays.
5. Welcome new Board members.
Chairman Head welcomed Pam Norwood, Reeves Hayter, and Miles Mathieu to the TIRZ Board,
expressing his gratitude for their willingness to serve and his anticipation of working with them.
6. Elect Vice -Chair of the Board.
Chairman Head stated that with Mr. Vine stepping into the Interim City Manager role and resigning
from the Board, a new Vice -Chair needed to be elected and opened the floor for nominations.
Ms. Norwood nominated Miles Mathieu to serve as Vice -Chair and Mr. McMonigle seconded. Motion
carried 6 ayes — 0 nays.
Miles Mathieu will serve as the Vice -Chair of the Board.
Page I of 2
7. Receive update from and provide direction to staff regarding authorizing the retention of a consultant to
assist the Board with strategies for reviewing and possibly amending the Project and Financing Plans for
TIRZ No. 1.
Director of Planning and Community Development, Osei Amo-Mensah, stated that the sub -committee
had met twice and went over the list of consultants. Of the 8 consultant groups who were contacted, 2
responded; Forked Pine Consulting and Capex Consulting Group. Forked Pine Consulting has submitted
a Comprehensive Proposal, and the committee is still waiting on a Comprehensive Proposal from Capex
Consulting Group. Chairman Head stated that he hoped to present the proposals to the Board at the next
meeting and act if possible. Mr. Mathieu inquired whether a scope was included with the proposals, and
Ms. Hammond replied that a general scope was provided. Chairman Head stated that he felt it would be
beneficial to send the proposals to all of the board members when they are received. Mr. Amo-Mensah
said he would send them to each member. Ms. Hammond stated that both groups that responded are
more than capable of completing the requested scope and that she was encouraged.
8. Discuss and possibly act on changing the meeting time for board meetings.
Chairman Head said he brought this item before the Board after being approached by citizens who wanted
to attend the meetings. He noted that, as a board responsible for overseeing taxpayer funds, they should
not schedule meetings earlier than 4:00 P.M. to accommodate more citizen involvement. Ms. Hammond
and Mr. Hayter recommended 4:00 as the new meeting time and the rest of the Board members agreed.
A Motion to move the meeting time for board meetings from 3:00 to 4:00 was made by Ms. Norwood and
seconded by Ms. Hammond. Motion carried 6 ayes — 0 nays.
9. Request future agenda items.
Mr. Hayter inquired about the adoption of the new Bylaws and whether the TIRZ board had to adopt them
separately. After following up with City Attorney, Stephanie Harris, it was determined that the TIRZ board
did not need to adopt the new Bylaws because the City Council had already done so.
Mr. Hayter also inquired about larger maps of each sub -zone. Deputy City Clerk, Skylar Unger, stated
that she could provide that information and would forward it to the board.
10. Adjournment.
There being no further business, Chairman Head adjourned the meeting at 3:12 P.M.
...�....... ... . . . ..... ... . .
Miles Mathieu, Vice Chairman an
Page 2 of 2
MINUTES OF THE MAIN STREET ADVISORY BOARD
PARIS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
107 E. KAUFMAN
PARIS TEXAS 75460
TUESDAY AUGUST 13 2024
Present: Board Members: Glee Emmite, Melissa Jones, Tyrone Hayden,
Becky Semple, Kim Kalina, Mary Hart, Kevin
Moore
City Representatives: Cheri Bedford, Main Street Manager;
Osei Amo-Mensah , Director of Planning and
Community Development
Citizens: Ryan Matthews
Not present: William Walker
Vice Chairman Emmite called the meeting to order at 4:30pm.
1. Citizen forum:
No one presented at citizens forum.
2. Welcome New Members
Bedford introduced new members: Kim Kalina, Kevin Moore and Mary Hart.
3. Review minutes from the July meeting:
A motion was made to approve the July meeting minutes by Hayden. Motion was
seconded by Moore. 7 ayes, 0 nays
4. Building Improvement Grant reimbursement of $5000 for 39 N Main Street - Ryan
Matthews, Paris Brewery. - Matthews went over the projects that had been completed, most
under budget. Progress photos were also shared. Bedford informed the board that
Matthews had completed all the requirements to receive the funding. Jones made a motion
to award the reimbursement of $5000 to Matthews. Hart seconded. Motion passed
unanimously.
5. Main Street Advisory Board Purpose Statement - A copy of the updated Purpose Statement
was given to the board for review and approval. Moore made a motion that the Board
adopt the new purpose statement. Hart seconded. Motion unanimously passed.
6. Main Street Advisory Board Accountability - Each board member was given a copy of the
accountability form. Hart, being new to the board, stated that she was grateful to know
what the expectations and responsibilities are.
7. Election of Officers: Emmite nominated Jones to remain as secretary. Jones nominated
Emmite for Chairman. Emmite also nominated Hart for Vice -Chairman. There was no
other nominations.
8. Coordinators Report - Coordinator Bedford provided each board member with a Main
Street Binder, including all pertinent information concerning the Main Street Project.
Bedford encouraged members to familiarize themselves with the information, as well as the
Main Street America and Texas Main Street websites. Bedford introduced Director Amo-
Mensah, who briefly spoke to the board. Bedford promoted a small business webinar on
building a digital footprint, happening on August 22, at 2:OOpm. Also a small business
development meeting was announced for September 24, at 6:OOpm.
9. Hart made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Hart seconded. Motion passed. Board
adjourned at 5:42 p.m.
10. Following adjournment, the Board took a brief walking survey tour. Bedford gave an
informative tour, explaining the plans for 1st Street, the Plaza, the Farmers Market,
Future agenda items:
No future agenda items discussed.
Chairman
MINUTES rvOF,THE REGULAR MEETING
ME„ETING
OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
F ..-..µ.
107 E KAUFMAN ST
PARIS. TEXAS 75460
WEDNESDAY Amu ust 14„ 2024
4:00 P.M.
coc <Ar -'t, m v m vvr� P t4 -T- Y"`1j
Present: Commission Members: Ryan Matthews
Matthew Coyle
Roxann Hadley
Linda Knox
Kelsey Turk
Glee Emmite
Absent:
Millicent Kee — (Alternate)
Tracy Dougherty
City Representative: Duke McGee, HPO Staff Liaison
Osei Amo-Mensah, Director of Planning &
Community Development
Guest:
1. Call meeting to order
No Guests were present
The meeting was called to order by the chairman at 4:04 PM
2. Citizens forum
No one came forth to speak during the Citizens Forum
3. Approval of June Minutes
No minutes to approve — item skipped
4. Welcome New Members
New members Commissioner Hadley, Knox, Turk and Emmite were introduced
5. Review and act on the following incentive applications for the property located in HD-1, Tax
ID # 16556- 1032 Church Street, Randy Hider
A. Fagade Grant reimbursement
B. Verification and Tax Exemption Agreement for the Construction of Historically
Compatible Structure (Residential)
Commission discussed the final structure.
A motion was made by Commissioner Emitte, seconded by Commissioner Turk that Item
5.A. the Fagade Grant Reimbursement be approved. Motion carried: Ayes 6; Nays 0
A motion was made by Commissioner Coyle, seconded by Commissioner Knox that Item
S.B. the Verification and Tax Agreement be approved. Motion carried: Ayes 6; Nays 0
5. Election of officers: Chairman, Vice Chairman, Secretary
CHAIRMAN– Commissioner Matthews was nominated by Commissioner Emmite and
seconded by Commissioner Turk, the nomination was approved. Ayes 6, Nays 0.
VICE CHAIRMAN– Commissioner Coyle was nominated by Commissioner Matthews and
seconded by Commissioner Knox, the nomination was approved. Ayes 6, Nays 0.
SECRETARY– Commissioner Knox was nominated by Commissioner Coyle and seconded by
Commissioner Hadley, the nomination was approved. Ayes 6, Nays 0.
6. --CONSENT AGENDA—
[Items appearing oil this consent agenda may be approved by a single vote of the
Commission, with such approval applicable to all items appearing on said agenda. If any
Commission member desires to discuss and consider separately any item appearing on the
consent agenda, that Commission member may do so by requesting that the item be
removed.from the consent agenda and considered as a separate item.]
Discussion and possible action regarding the following structures considered by code
inspectors to be in violation of Article III of Chapter 7 of the Code of Ordinances of the City
of Paris, Paris, Texas, entitled "Substandard and Dangerous Buildings and Structures," to
determine,whether such buildings or structure„s_can be rehabilitated and designated on the
National_Reaister of Historic Places._as a recorded Texas Historic Landmark. or as historic
P_rQVe as„desi,rn,a,,,ted b_�. the Cite Council of the Cite 9f Paris.
A. 2845 Lewis Lane, Essent PRMC Addition 306 #2
B. 832 Provine, City Block 75-A, Lot 7A & 8
C. 1124 S Church, City Block 158-A, Lot 2
D. 1445 & 1431 W Sherman, City Block 229, Lot 13 & 14
E. 129 W Washington, City Block 156, Lot 6
F. 910 W Cherry, City Block 83, Lot 36
G. 623 SE 61h, City Block 162, Lot 5
Commissioner Turk made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Hadley, to approve to
remove Item G. 623 SE 6” Street from the Consent Agenda. Motion carried: Ayes 6; Nays 0
Commissioner Turk made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Hadley, to approve the
remaining items on the Consent Agenda. Motion carried: Ayes 6; Nays 0
7. Coordinators Report
a. Review Share Point/MyGov
In the future, agenda items will be shared via SharePoint/MyGov instead of Dropbox
Discussed information need in SharePoint.
b. Briefing on Paris Development Code
The confusing language is being updated and coordinated with the Design Standards
c. Discuss Share Point/MyGov
S. Future Agenda Items
Commissioner Emmite would like to have more information on the process for structures are
placed on the Consent Agenda.
Need for a sub committee on properties that are removed from the consent agenda
Adjourn:
A motion was made by Commissioner Hadley seconded by Commissioner Coyle to
adjourn. Meeting was adjourned at 4:50 PM
Ryan atthews, Chairman CVlcko—C, Wt/Z� N
MINUTES OF THE BUILDING AND STANDARDS COMMISSION MEETING
OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
AUGUST 19, 2024
The Building and Standards Commission of the City of Paris met for a regular session at 3:00 p.m.
on Monday, August 19, 2024, at the City of Paris Council Chambers, 107 E. Kaufman St., Paris,
TX 75460.
Present: Board Members: Chris Fitzgerald
Kim Walker
Brandon Kearney
A.W "Plug" Clem
Chris Dux
Alexander Moore
City Representatives: Robert Talley — Code Enforcement
Jacie Sparks — Code Enforcement
Nicki Brown — Code Enforcement
Cade Oats — Assistant Fire Marshal
Clyde Crews — Fire Marshal (until 3:30 PM)
Osei Amo-Mensah, AICP — Director of Planning &
Community Development (until 3:30 PM)
Duke McGee — Building Official; Assistant Director
of Planning and Community Development (until
3:30 PM)
Absent Board Members: Ken Kohls
Call meeting to order.
Chris Fitzgerald, Vice Chairman, called the meeting to order at 3:07 p.m.
2. Approve minutes from the meeting of July 15, 2024.
Motion made by A.W "Plug" Clem, seconded by Chris Fitzgerald, to approve
minutes. Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
Public Hearing to consider presentations by City of Paris Code Inspectors and owner(s)
and/or lien holder(s) of the below properties who have been given notice of a violation of
Chapter 4, Article 4.03 entitled "Substandard and Dangerous Buildings and Structures;"
Chapter 7, Article 7.04 entitled "Weeds, Junk, and Other Objectionable, Unsightly, or
Unsanitary Matter on Private Premises;" Chapter 8, Article 8.10 entitled "Outdoor
Storage;" Code of Ordinances of the City of Paris, Paris, TX:
A. 623 SE 6a'; City of Paris, Block 163, Lot 5
Owner: Roddy Cal & Mickie Dudley; 935 SE 6a', Paris, TX 75460
Pulled by Historic Preservation Commission.
Building and Standards Meeting
August 19, 2024
Page 2
B. 910 W Cherry; City of Paris, Block 83, Lot 36
Owner: Celestine Thomas; C/O Rita Dixon; 8700 Stonebrooke Parkway, Box 1996,
Frisco, TX 75034
Robert Talley stated that the back of structure is separating and there is missing and
deteriorated wood throughout structure. The roof is damaged. Parts of the ceiling and
roof joints are falling. Structure is sinking and bowing. The fence on the back of
property is broken. There is also a fallen tree on the property.
There was discussion amongst the board, Mrs. Rita Dixon, and Robert Talley
regarding heirship, the value of the property, and the timeline she will need to sell this
property.
Robert Talley's recommendation: Declare a nuisance, removal of fallen tree,
repair fence, and secure the structure within 14 days, or city has a right to do so.
Demolition of structure within 30 days or city has the right to do so.
Motion made by Kim Walker, seconded by Chris Dux, to repair fence, secure
structure and remove fallen tree within 14 days, or the city has the right to do so. Also
to come back before the commission in 90 days for an update. Motion carried
unanimously. 6-0
2605 W Houston; Sperry's Yd Addition, Block 1, Lot 8
Owner: Frank Eugene Middleton Jr; Guy Edward Middleton & Patricia Wortham,
2605 W Houston, Paris, TX 75460
Robert Talley stated that there has been no contact with the owner. There is a
gentleman named Craig Reynolds who is living on a camper on the vacant lot. There
is junk and rubbish such as tires, sheet metal litter and trash, lumber, buckets and
other scattered items on property. There is also a porch that was built for the camper
on the property as well.
Mr. Reynolds, was present to speak on behalf of the property. He stated he pays rent
to a Mr. Gaither who says he is related to the owner. Mr. Talley explained to them
that they can only live in a camper two weeks out of the year if they are working on
the structure, which the property in question is a vacant lot. There was discussion
amongst the board, Robert Talley, and Mr. Craig Reynolds regarding the ownership,
city permits, and legality of living in a camper inside city limits.
Robert Talley's recommendation: Declare a nuisance, removal of camper and
vacating property within 30 days, or city has the right to do so, and removal of junk
and rubbish within 30 days, or city has the right to do so.
Motion made by Chris Fitzgerald, seconded by Chris Dux, to follow staff
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
Building and Standards Meeting
August 19, 2024
Page 3
E. 129 W Washington; City of Paris, Block 156, Lot 6
Owner: Don King Barton & Janie M Barton; Maris Briggle, 265 27th NW, Paris,
TX 75460
Robert Talley stated that squatters have moved a shed onto the property without the
owner knowing. They are residing in the structure. There is junk and rubbish all over
the property.
There was discussion amongst the board, Robert Talley and Mr. King Martin
regarding the eviction process and the liabilities as a property owner.
Robert Talley's recommendation: Removal of shed, removal of junk and rubbish
and vacating the property within 30 days, or city has the right to do so.
Motion made by Chris Dux, seconded by Kim Walker, to follow staff
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
C. 100 NW 3rd; City of Paris, Block 20, Lot A
Owner: Blake & Hinkle Office Building LLC; David Alarid, 25 NW 1St St., Paris,
TX 75460
Robert Talley stated that there was a fence put on the property as a barricade but
since, it has deteriorated and is falling apart. It is unsightly and is now considered
junk and rubbish.
There was discussion amongst the board and Robert Talley regarding the Historic
Preservation Commissions requirements for fencing and this fence does not meet
them.
Robert Talley's recommendation: Declare a nuisance, removal of fence, junk and
rubbish and barricade within 30 days or city has right to do so.
Motion made by Kim Walker, seconded by Chris Fitzgerald, to follow staff
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
D. 100 NW 3rd; City of Paris, Block 9, Lot A
Owner: Blake & Hinkle Office Building LLC; David Alarid, 25 NW 1St St., Paris,
TX 75460
Robert Talley stated that there was a fence put on the property as a barricade but
since, it has deteriorated and is falling apart. It is unsightly and is now considered
junk and rubbish. There was discussion amongst the board and Robert Talley
regarding the Historic Preservation Commissions requirements for fencing and this
fence does not meet them.
Building and Standards Meeting
August 19, 2024
Page 4
Robert Talley's recommendation: Declare a nuisance, removal of fence, junk and
rubbish and barricade within 30 days or city has right to do so.
Motion made by Chris Dux, seconded by Kim Walker, to follow staff
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
F. 415 Shady Oaks; Shay Oaks, Block 3, Lot 11
Owner: Leslie P Bridgers; 415 Shady Oaks Ln, Paris, TX 75460
Robert Talley stated that there has been no contact with the owner. Someone is
living in a camper in the front yard. They have no sewer hookup and they have an
extension cord ran to the camper.
Robert Talley's recommendation: Declare a nuisance, removal of camper within
30 days, or city has right to do so.
Motion made by Chris Fitzgerald, seconded by Kim Walker, to follow staff
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
G. 832 Provine; City of Paris, Block 75-A, Lot 7A & 8
Owner: Jesse Hall; 865 NE 5th, Paris, TX 75460
Robert Talley stated that there is a shed that has been moved onto the property.
They were getting power to the shed from a generator that was found in the house
next door. The house has fire damage, foundation damage and missing windows. It
looks like they started to repair but have since stopped working on it. The roof is
starting to sag.
Robert Talley's recommendation: Declare a nuisance, removal of shed and vacate
property within 30 days or city has right to do so. Also secure main structure within
14 days, or city has the right to do so.
Motion made by Chris Fitzgerald, seconded by Chris Dux, to Demolish main
structure within 60 days, remove the shed on property and vacate within 30 days, or
city has the right to do so. Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
Building and Standards Meeting
August 19, 2024
Page 5
H. 1124 Church St., City of Paris, Block 158-A, Lot 2
Owner: Virgil N Kelley; Gimmi S Allen, 1124 S Church, Paris, TX 75460
Robert Talley stated a tree had fallen on the structure causing it to push off its
foundation. The owner could potentially still be residing there. The whole front of
the structure is crushed.
Robert Talley's recommendation: Declare a nuisance, demolition and vacate
within 30 days or city has right to do so.
Motion made by Chris Dux, seconded by Brandon Kearney, to follow staff
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
I. 1145 & 1431 W Sherman; City of Paris, Block 229, Lot 14
Owner: Jimmy Lane; 1431 W Sherman, Paris, TX 75460
Robert Talley stated the structure has demolition orders on it already but the tenant
will not leave. He brought this back for vacate orders. The property has junk and
rubbish as well as junk vehicles and a junk boat.
Robert Talley's recommendation: Declare a nuisance, remove all junk and
rubbish, remove all junk vehicles including boat, and demolition of all structures
including sheds within 30 days or city has right to do so.
Motion made by Kim Walker, seconded by A.W "Plug" Clem, to follow staff
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
K. 2845 Lewis Lane; Essent PRMC Addition 306 # 2, Block B, Lot 1
Owner: Essent PRMC LP; 330 Seven Springs Way, Brentwood, TN 37027
Physical Therapy Building:
Robert Talley stated this building has busted windows and plant life on the interior
of the structure. There is graffiti throughout the structure as well as junk and
rubbish.
Pavilion:
Robert Talley stated that the siding (stucco) is buckling and the roof is collapsing.
There are busted out windows and doors. The structure is unsecure.
Robert Talley's recommendation: Declare a nuisance, demolition of the Pavilion
and the Physical Therapy building within 30 days or city has right to do so.
Motion made by Kim Walker, seconded by A.W "Plug" Clem, to follow staff
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. 6-0
Building and Standards Meeting
August 19, 2024
Page 6
4. Adjournment.
There being no further business, a motion to adjourn w' made by Chris Fitzgerald, Vice
Chairman, at 4:55 p.m. j
Item No. 7
memorandum
TO: Mayor, Mayor Pro -Tem, and City Council
Robert Vine, Interim City Manager
FROM: Gene Anderson, Finance Director
SUBJECT: JULY 2024 FINANCIAL REPORT
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND: Section 69 (3) of the Paris City Charter requires the Finance Director to submit
to the City Council through the City Manager a monthly statement of receipts and disbursements.
STATUS OF ISSUE: This report updates the City Council on the City's financial activities through
the month stated in the subject line.
BUDGET: Not affected by this report.
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to receive the monthly financial report.
City of Paris
July 2024 Financial Report Comments
Net to Date Comparison of Revenues:
I. The operations and maintenance property tax and related collections reported are 1.09% more than
what was reported in 2023. Current tax collections this year are 97.46% of the tax levy vs. 97.54%
last year.
2. Sales taxes are up 3.75% from last year ($323,556).
3. Hotel occupancy taxes are up 12.09% compared to last year ($121,643).
4. Franchise fees are down 3.73% compared to last year ($112,478). This is due to a significant
decrease in the payment from Atmos.
5. Permit fees are up 107.05% from last year ($285,546). This increase is due to new commercial
permits.
6. Municipal Court fines and related fees are down 11.86% compared to last year ($24,656).
7. Other revenue includes leases, interest, copy fees, birth & death certificates, library fees, mixed
beverage tax, and other minor revenues. This revenue is up 15.69% ($379,522). This is due to
higher interest income and miscellaneous revenue.
8. Sanitation fees are up 4.76 0.55% ($8,439).
9. EMS fees are up 30.42% compared to last year ($858,284).
10. Lamar County EMS contributions are up 6.05% (21,461) compared to last year.
11. Total General Fund revenues are up 7.21% compared to last year ($1,950,965). General Fund
revenues equal 97.83% of the budget with the City being 83.33% through the budget year.
12. Total General Fund expenditures are up 5.03% ($1,119,453) compared to last year. General Fund
expenditures to date equal 75.20% of budget with the City being 83.33% through the budget year.
13. Sewer revenue was up 16.98% ($1,360,262).
14. Water revenue was down 0.80% ($58,734).
15. Other revenue sources are down 4.63% ($34,565).
16. Total Water & Sewer revenues, ignoring transfers and adjustments, are 7.91% above last year
($1,266,962) and represents 82.32% of the total budget.
17. Total Water & Sewer expenses are 5.47% above last year ($509,589) at this point and represent
46.77% of the total budget (78.43% adjusted for debt payments.) while the City is 83.33% through
the budget year.
18. The Airport Fund has overcome the deficit reported last month with summer activity boosting
revenue as expected.
19. The Sanitation Fund shows in this report to be operating at a deficit, but this is a timing issue. There
is a pending revenue transfer from the Water Billing Office which collects the sanitation fees to the
Sanitation Fund which will eliminate the deficit shown in this report.
Departmental Expenditure Summary:
At this point the City is ten months or 83.33% through the budget year. It is important to remember that
expenditures do not occur equally throughout the year. For example, capital expenditures and
association memberships are one-time expenditures that if made early in the fiscal year can produce a
distorted expenditure percentage. Within the General, Water & Sewer, Airport, and Sanitation Funds
there were six departments whose expenditures were over 83.33%.
1. City Council -113.98%. The overage amounts to $58,392 and was due to consultant costs and
the housing assessment study. The City will receive reimbursement on 2/3 of the study.
2. City Manager -87.58%. The overage amounts to $32,457 and was due to salary & benefits,
furniture, publications, insurance, and minor apparatus.
3. Paris Band -102.78%. The overage amounts to $4,484 and was due to payments to band
members.
4. Library -86.94%. The overage amounts to $30,501 and was caused by supplies, technical
processing, annual insurance payment, travel, furniture, and maintenance agreement.
5. Water Treatment Plant -85.94%. The overage amounts to $94,454 and was caused by lab
chemicals and filtration plant costs.
6. Sanitation -90.18%. The overage amounts to $94,537 and was due to CARDS payments.
General comments to the City Council:
1. Over 99% of all the City operational activity takes place in the General Fund, the Water & Sewer
Fund, Airport Fund, or the Sanitation Fund. The other funds are special purpose funds with
limited activity and usually with legal restrictions on what their money can be spent on. For that
reason, I normally only comment on the activity of the General Fund, Water & Sewer Fund,
Airport Fund, and the Sanitation Fund. However, if circumstances merited it, I would make
comment on activity in one of the other funds.
2. 1 try to anticipate questions you might have about the report and comment on those points.
After you receive your packet and review the monthly report, if you have questions about the
report, please let the Manager know (or me if you can't reach the Manager) before the Council
meeting, if possible, in case I must research the answer to your question. That does not prevent
you from asking the question at the meeting if you wish to make a point, but it does help
prevent questions coming up that I can't answer on the spot and possibly delay the Council in
making a decision.
City of Paris
General Fund Recap
July 2024
Current Year to Date
Prior Year to Date
Netto Date
FY2024
FY2023
Taxes Collected
$
8,243,958.33
$
8,154,311.68
$
89,646.65
Sales Tax
$
8,930,523.57
$
8,606,966.97
$
323,556.60
Hotel/MotelTax
$
1,126,964.24
$
1,005,320.98
$
121,643.26
Franchise Fees
$
2,900,395.35
$
3,012,873.71
$
(112,478.36)
Permits
$
552,285.08
$
266,738.16
$
285,546.92
Court Fees
$
183,073.14
$
207,730.13
$
(24,656.99)
Other Revenue
$
2,797,084.67
$
2,417,562.56
$
379,522.11
Sanitation
$
185,518.17
$
177,078.55
$
8,439.62
EMS Fees
$
3,679,255.94
$
2,820,971.71
$
858,284.23
Lamar County EMS
$
376,036.30
$
354,575.00
$
21,461.30
Total Revenues
$
28,975,094.79
$
27,024,129.45
$
1,950,965.34
Total Expenditures
$
23,357,229.67
$
22,237,775.76
$
1,119,453.91
Net To Date
$
5,617,865.12
$
4,786,353.69
$
831,511.43
Prior Year to Date
Current Year Budget
Current Month Actual
Prior Year Month Actual
Current Year to Date
FY2024
July 2024
168,573.11
July 2023
190,500.00
FY2024
203,900.00
$
26,648.87
$
4,273.88
$
217,135.84
r
$
103,829.42
$
47,591.19
$
667,618.06
'
$
34,167.73
$
25,269.18
$
316,150.8✓:
)urt
$
19,848.08
$
17,560.58
$
213,249.35
7,660,330.00
$
17,159.54
$
16,182.78
$
179,022.94
',Auditing
$
77,394.08
$
286,088.91
$
422,246.22
$
$
761,094.26
$
539,677.97
$
6,007,623.46
$
$
421,850.76
$
416,249.17
$
4,665,576.27
)evelopment
$
139,955.95
$
125,603.22
$
1,123,107.57
2,544,784.00
$
36,865.97
$
18,357.48
$
310,620.06
474,902.00
$
25,089.61
$
18,185.38
$
206,886.59
eation, ROW
$
166,170.62
$
161,660.59
$
1,173,291.63
$
23,050.00
640,576.99
$
842,999.00
$
799,835.00
;hways
$
163,679.67
$
133,642.48
$
1,032,610.28
lic Lighting
$
48,399.92
$
35,318.61
$
387,674.55
$
24,484.64
$
27,279.55
$
299,503.85
ledical Service
$
577,845.90
$
306,365.39
$
3,703,373.86
$
22,844.13
$
20,793.10
$
23,692.53
$
48,943.93
$
59,381.49
$
732,972.16
roses
$
61,779.55
$
55,554.42
$
1,674,873.57
$
-
$
(73,358.57)
$
2,778,052.63
$
2,241,676.80
$
23,357,229.67
Prior Year to Date
Current Year Budget
Prior Year Budget
FY2023
FY2024
FY2023
168,573.11
$
190,500.00
$
203,900.00
501,993.98
$
762,223.00
$
618,106.00
318,457.92
$
418,188.00
$
402,097.00
189,694.51
$
273,021.00
$
251,997.00
166,445.05
$
219,071.00
$
205,321.00
649,826.92
$
661,212.00
$
732,719.00
5,625,375.80
$
7,660,330.00
$
7,257,141.00
4,493,510.87
$
5,664,697.00
$
5,594,674.00
1,192,097.66
$
1,685,684.00
$
1,649,428.00
322,365.60
$
418,884.00
$
396,933.00
186,961.59
$
258,963.00
$
232,470.00
1,188,758.47
$
1,410,031.00
$
1,486,128.00
822,602.91
$
2,544,784.00
$
1,276,173.00
380,862.89
$
515,289.00
$
474,902.00
292,050.31
$
401,450.00
$
370,001.00
3,604,644.65
$
5,016,435.00
$
4,422,181.00
21,433.48
$
23,050.00
$
23,050.00
640,576.99
$
842,999.00
$
799,835.00
1,493,273.02
$
2,040,739.00
$
2,061,234.00
136,929.86
$
50,000.00
$
40,000.00
(158,659.83)
22,237,775.76
$
31,057,550.00
$
28,498,290.00
City of Paris
Water & Sewer Fund Recap
July 2024
Current Year To Date
Prior Year To Date
Net To Date
FY2024
FY2023
Water Revenues
$
7,199,954.06
$
7,258,688.48
$
(58,734.42)
Sewer Revenues
$
9,366,677.64
$
8,006,415.17
$
1,360,262.47
Other Revenues
$
7111330.03
$
745,895.48
$
(34,565.45)
Total Revenues
$
17,277,961.73
$
16,010,999.13
$
1,266,962.60
Total Expenditures
$
9,816,365.66
$
9,306,776.26
$
509,589.40
Debt
$
6,645,390.00
$
6,294,134.61
$
351,255.39
Net To Date
$
816,206.07
$
410,088.26
$
406,117.81
Fund
penditures-May 2024
Current Month Actual
Prior Year Month Actual
Current Year to Date
Prior Year to Date
Current Year Budget
Prior Year Budget
May2024
May 2023
FY2024
FY2023
FY2024
FY2023
e
igand Collectin
$
$
8,858.83
267,513.17
$ 9,646.37
$
$ 101,096.33
$
95,531.74
$ 123,628.00
$ 117,995.00
auction
$
270,973.18
248,677.72
$ 2,409,905.80
$
2,312,585.03
$ 2,908,540.00
$ 2,758,811.00
ribution
$
116,887.94
$ 287,089.56
$ 3,110,553.01
$
2,767,708.48
$ 3,619,463.00
$ 3,335,856.00
ntenance
$
$ 106,978.33
$ 1,237,448.77
$
1,283,724.70
$ 1,765,305.00
$ 1,693,625.00
42,996.78
$ 34,331.51
$ 609,582.65
$
606,753.64
$ 959,441.00
$ 849,852,00
:erTreatment
$
211,837.95
$ 237,011.73
$ 2,001,735.68
$
1,859,149.81
$ 2,518,560.00
$ 2,434,667.00
's
$
29,939.09
$ 33,118.14
$ 346,043.42
$
381,322.86
$ 477,423.00
$ 460,242.00
$
949,006.94
$ 956,853.36
$ 9,816,365.66
$
9,306,776.26
$ 12,372,360.00
$ 11,650,548.00
City of Paris
Cox Field Airport Recap
July 2024
Current Year to Date Prior Year to Date
FY 2024 FY 2023
Airport Revenue
$
881,039.03
$
989,168.04
Airport Expenses
$
858,778.56
$
806,581.77
Net To Date
$
22,260.47
$
182,586.27
City of Paris
Sanitation Fund Recap
July 2024
Current Year to Date Prior Year to Date
FY 2024 FY 2023
Sanitation Revenues
$
1,149,279.34
$
1,055,767.72
Sanitation Expenses
$
1,244,491.22
$
1,047,365.79
Net To Date
$
(95,211.88)
$
8,401.93
Item No. 8
erts, Ditches & Intakes
RESS STREET PROBLEM ACTION
19TH NE DITCH CLEANED DITCH
19TH NE DITCH CLEANED DITCH
13TH NE & TUDOR DITCH ICLEANED DITCH
DATE
08/08/24
08/08/24
erts, Ditches & Intakes
RESS STREET PROBLEM ACTION DATE
LOCK
W SHERMAN
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE 108/22/24
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
---------------------------
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
iCHECK INTAKE
,INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
erts, Ditches & Intakes
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
erts, Ditches & Intakes
RESS ISTREET
PROBLEM !ACTION
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
DATE
erts, Ditches & Intakes
RESS ISTREET
PROBLEM ACTION
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
NTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
DATE
erts, Ditches & Intakes
RESS STREET PROBLEM ACTION DATE
16TH NE & JOHNSON
JOHNSON
DITCH
CLEANED DITCH
DITCH
CLEANED DITCH
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
INTAKE
CHECKINTAKE
08/08/24
erts, Ditches & Intakes
RESS ISTREET PROBLEM ACTION DATE
MEADOWLARK
DITCH
CLEANED DITCH
08/22/24
MEADOWLARK
DITCH
CLEANED DITCH
08/22/24
MEADOWLARK
DITCH
CLEANED DITCH
08/22/24
SHERWOOD
DITCH
CLEANED DITCH
08/22/24
Item No. 9
Code Enforcement Report: Au nst 2024
Cases Worked: 326
Cases Completed: 285
Lots Abated: 200
Other Work by Abatement Crew:
Removed Fallen Trees and Brush — 2 days
Removed Tires — 2 days
Removed Illegal Dumps — 4 days
Repaired/Serviced Equipment — 2 days
Cut Blind Corner -4 days
Worked Downtown — 2 days
Demolition Report: Auust 2024
There were 12 properties presented to the BSC in August:
623 SE 6th
100 NW 3rd
129 W Washington
832 Provine
1445 W Sherman
2605 W Houston
910 W Cherry
CB- 20, L- A
415 Shady Oaks
1124 S Church
1431 W Sherman
2845 Lewis Ln
There were 4 structures demolished in August, 2024:
127 SE 16th
1364 W Houston
1518 W Houston
1813 W Houston
Memorandum Agenda Item 10
TO: Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
City Council
FROM: Todd Mittge, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of the Ricardo Ramirez Estates
Addition, Lot 1, LCAD: 15973, located at 610 West Austin.
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND
The applicant requests approval of a Final Plat to build a Multi -family structure.
This was a non -platted City Lot and Block parcel.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the following condition:
1. Location of proposed lots, streets, alleys...., Minimum finished floor elevations for each
lot.... Chapter 9A, V Final Plat, Subsection 8.
a. Minimum Finished Floor Elevation of the proposed structure shall be shown on the
final plat.
v Cn [mMllhq Pavnrd e-v- CIIAINLIW FENCE
O.P.R.LCT -OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, -- BARBED HIRE FENCE
L `R CWHTY, TIX,[5
NATER LINE
R.P.R.LCT - REN. PROPERTY REGARDS, -+ UNDROUND
RMIMATE/ r-v r v-v v i LAMAR CWMY. T!%A9-.-v-u- ERG
APP
r r r v APPROXIMATE/ v r v v I LOCATION OF V NC O.R,L.C.T. - DEED RECOROS,_ SANITARY 5ENER LINE
LOCATION OF 12' CI VLAMAR COUNTY, TEXA5 -o• a.•- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
.E. UTILITY EAB@tENi' (BY THIS PUT) ASPHALT
B.L. BUILDING LINE (BY TIAs PLAT)
iNN ROD FOUND = METE
W K4L7FMANS7FEL7 I -gg IIjI ®'>r FOUND IN caur+ETE ......... ...........
-- TII -22BB � �- -- DAL F.• i MWN 's cERn TE
I ^ I C11L I WHEREAS Rlcvrdo
Rvminsara
N. h th. ew M
1 o el of I M elluW.tl I lAar Co-y. T aa. and b.lnp
I men PaalnularW dR-1- of lolls.:
CALLED 0.40 ACRES B.Inp a 0.14 1- Mxl 0r Pvn.l 01 land W-IN M M. LI— MOM( Survey, Ab.MCI No. ])8, Loma,
p JUSTIN HENDERSON, ET UX
j V of I Courtly, TM I.. ontl b.Inq .1I of Mat a.rmln vall.d 0.143 acn Mal of (and ca nv.y.d I— Floyd WEL-H,
MA
V I I (FILE NO. 211438 -2024 O.P.R.L.C.T.) I to Rlcartb M1IM Mop, by Gen-I WO MDN DMIN, m MCOMNI in FII. No. 203731-2023, OfOaiol Public
y- ��By9 R.oa... Lamar Geanly, T..,(B.adap. en baa.a w xA. s3 (Solt), r..a. xaah E. -2,a.
IV d I a' I CAL P v I =d by GPs. Am ana ahMnOn shorn han It 9dd), end b.lnp men I+oNeulody d.NHb.d by
ui o a m.l.. aaa bwnaa I. mlmw.:
LUCY COLEMAN STOKES o I 2 m �L BEGINNING at a 1/2• ISI and bund of th. SoWhr Isms of wid 0.141 acn imcl, of Ih. SOWh... t
(VOL. B91, P. BI N I oomx of a haat o1 lend mnr.yad tv Mary D.• Sm.a, by a.•d oa rwerd.d In velum• 859, Pap• )SI, Dwtl
R.aartl. Lamar Ceu M,. T..... and In Ih. N P.. e1 W 1ua11e SM 1
LL I THENCE Il HH, 1 tlwnp 5/ minuh. 10 .wond, 1.05 W11h Ih, W7/ 1 of .aid 0.14] acn Ho ontl wIM I
V M• Earl Iln• I wld sRm Iro.h a tll.farm If 123.05 1..1 M a I/2• Mn retl f1. that Ih. NU..
.r or .aid 0.143 oan +row, m M. NwM.aa wm.r of cam sn..a Mn. ana n . swM Fla. w an
�Ei as >• I I I I ROYCE LODGES2850-gi oll.y. I
(FLE.P. 142350-2017 oI
YY APPROXIMATE O. P.R.L.C.T.) THENCE Nerfn E9 d of Id minuh. 42 ..Gana. OD 1.1 M. North It,, o} It .d . 1. tract and
Pt e� F j J y D LQ-J�TIGN OF b' PVG I I— the AANI Nn. or -Id ally, a " 11* * of 50.00 f111 M a 1/1" non Fla fountl v1 1M Norine1M
I—, I ,am 0.143 sen troN ona In Ih. W..t 112• of I8cl ffl-I .UH FIM .. vonv,ytl to Cary Lynn
T •tA <R PC � � W ��.1 al, by d..d oa rw0n.tl in Rh No. 063372-2008, 011lmel Publie R.rortla. Lamer CounW T.Kv.:
4P�P0• y I -- I i �� THENCE south DO a.qn.. 54 m num. 49 .d. Eo.1, w M Ih. Ea Nl 01 w d 0. ooh Mol ana MN,
--- M. Wil iln.val m Was , So tllrl ., dl a 05 .1 to wlnl 1vr com.r al M. 6a'IM1.a.I , " i.
Mold a
a 1 �� wld 0.11! a n Inch al IM S1. 1 dlsl v r If .aid Gvp Mm, and In lh. Nedh Ne. al W wslM s., o
T h I Fv from whiClr an •%" bund cut In 11. beak e1 wr Dwn B-1, B3 I..,... 1S minuh. IB wond. Wpl a
\ SECOND TRACT d'sl.np at 0.65 110 ontl 1m sola POMC for ob m a T-Po.1 Iound bNo-, Noah 27 d.pn•, 59 m(,.t..
p `T E-; DAN, LLC uODna. W.ah o dhtanp 01 217 Ipl:
ALLEY (DEED EASP 50.D0') I THENCE SouM 88 d.9rp. M9 mina}.. 42 ..Gond. W.4, IN n 1h, SIIM 111, of Nil 0.113 acn Irocl ontl
-SII L'NIMPROI/EO (FILE NO. 200091-2022 O.P.OPR.L.GT.) bR
I CMF„ 891 4 w II rIM Ih. Me Iln. ai W AwNn SI-I a dhlen,. of 50.00 f 10 1M POINT OF BEGINNING and CONTAINING
CIAIL-.- I 50.00 F a FIRST TRACT y �'�q i� 9.252 couch feet or 0.14 acres of ana.
U I TIGHTURIBAN, LLC Ti.. B II M R.ghd d P f I nal Land Sun.y.r In Ih. Ski. of T.Rw, do h.pby 1IHIfy Thal I
H .� FILE NO. 200091-2022 O.P.R.LC.T.) I,. p .-I fhh plot 1 t IN. ground w y ane Mal Me monum.nl..horn Ih.rpn w.n
Qf d l/., I a.d hd., ,, W of .up.M.mn InvbMoMd,1 c. wPh M. PI,HIng RUIn ontl
p i tlo h CRY 1 FROM. La ,
r C-1 T.xa..
V W0. ] p1R 9AI OfNIARY 'H?s Idyll 110111
M7 I
G�jO I w4 5;107 S O� Jtt{DO I 11Ftl81f"1 ANTJu IIIALf P11W aIIII IOR NI
MMCIWd zzK^ N O 4 Nm.. �y;g I I Pe WOOED fY Iglgou 0lPo
MLLAVIp iO NO.H AE:H S N- F _fi�IUOx 1GRY1 IPf (IRM If
a LL g= EGISTEREDRPROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
TINA m SECOND TRACT 111 STATE OF TEXAS NO. 6746
p v w 0. W a ZONED MF 1 p GARY LYNN 6055, ET Al
O Y Ci P.i � MULTIPLE 1-LT 4 w LL)- (FILE NO. 063372-2008 O.P.R.L.C.T.) `
M DNE wi N o M O I I I NOW. THEREFORE. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS•
[ iJ DISTRICT I 2 a
j I = O v M W OI I THAT, Rh 0.Dmlr.z NON, doMM n,nby adopt MIs plot dlalyy vllon ihs hw.in above tlawrM.a property
r o. Rloorde RamMz E.M1.., an OddNlOn }v In. GN of Ppd., Iumar Cau . T.Ka., ontl ONlool.. b 1M1.
z I cpm 1. om
PO/HYDE ,Ap. MOILD ,Y b.1 vii W p PUDIIa ap rer.pr m nn.l., res ,enc . .ms snprn n• f n. ror a old canto p1
BEG/NN/NG v" ' anr� 1O . 0111 a.. ,1 ar a.ta9 .am. ler . purpoa. o CH mohillninp. addbg or
200 nm n en of OI .1p Wb. ml.m. INMUN .-IM. .-H-PI, I quanM.. M. w0rkmvn,Mp
°'tl`' a CAL ana me .dal. ae.a in Ib wwlruall0n ana U.-M.- 01 watp mvina, mom. and .Dw1
'-4C ]!- AJ (GEED -57)",I DEED 150') pvdnq WIII b. w Pl.i.a ..U, 0 P,ded of on. (1) ywr from M. cat. of aopPMnp o} M, Rnal P.
EEO 50' EO 51) DEED 51) P /^.
-= APPR IMATE YMnap, my nand. Inla In. _ do, of 2024
a
-. . -�%�" y' o %589'09 42 W rM p 1 d ocAT o we f
_ wAusrrNsnerV s0 DR -
APPRO%_M TE r (DEED WET 5000') v APFR 07ATE )L RIwMo Ramlr.z Nvry
o1TlplIti I
�
a . a SUBSCRIBED TO AND SWORN BEFORE 4E, a tory Pubik In and tar M. Slat. 01
(GEED I80.05� T �I (DEED SD') T (DEED 100')
FOUND WT IN I p I (.EEO T.1)BUIRa a r , ihl 1h. _day 1 ... 2024.
BACK OF CURB BEARS (FILE NO. 093843-2011 e I o
AO SB]'15'16•W 0.85' I O.P.R.L.C.T.) w
T-POST FOUND BEAR B o I I N bry Publk „••••••••.......,...
N2)59'4B-W 2.47' I I I F. 161OM MCBRO0C1 X uoiES
p (FILE NO. EDD( McB OOM L.0 T.)
_ LIMIT OF STUDY[ (REF. VOL. 541, P. BBB D.R.L.C.T.)
FT I -- BFIWNOS ARE 819ED N NAD OT Ew11A TFK15 NORM ODE M 4NE, AS ORSORYED BY OP3. MU AND DUGANCB SHM
-� I _ a ;RDx OT Gr /2 WN IRON R� Wpx A YE�
S , ALL lCT CORx[Ie xY,v1 . ,[T , W CM STAMPED ',Y_UNF'.
t= (,. DeLEON ET UX N I I <v 37 xD EAmr1xT nEcow ,roes WM xp1 w Tess or ON oR TxB RRM coxclRMno TxD PROP[Rn.
411N[ moPEAR sNCxx xLuax WM 9URYLYw psN ox O[[IB MD/OR MOAL D[9CRPTWM OnAINLD rNRWON NORMIL
CALLED CAR ACRES f (FILE NO. 15IMB-2016 L t ISIESLURCN I0.0CwUR6 THERE .M w 011 DDCUNEnS RECOMID/UNRCWI9TD THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBIECT. AND THB
WERNA YATES, ET VIP �I I S I I I�� O.P.R.L.C.T.) o I 1UN 11 N0 MAY 11-1 oM 111 OF Au 11 A' F or THE "EMECT As - xuLRN.
Z I a ZZ ZZ ALWVNEI A.. SAWARY SEWER A. SHOMN NEP[ON ARE MPRORwATL IN LOCATON AND DMCED Iwr THE ea YAPtl
(FILE .P. 185542-2021 O {, W u F H Znl[ AREA iIDON [IEYATION SHOWN NFREOx B r04 ALL WDDMIL SPACE OF MFW CONZIRUCl10N NOT IOUIDG n A RD00
O. P. R. L.C.T.) Y1I I I J I W i « WTARD MFA MO BZVARD -,1 A .111 OF TWELYE 111)NS, IMOVE TIRE AYERACa CNN ME "1" 01 MC AGAND"I
v IIOlJ]MAY OR TOP Oi 1pR10 CUR, "oh' T ROAG_ AWACEM M
< GL tl
Z Ja FEDERICO CHAVE2, ET U% FLOOD -1 T:
') < < ILL IF <I I I I THE PROPERTY IS SIXIWN M BONG LOCATED, IN ZONE K BY FLOOD INSURANCE RAl[ MM W. p2]]CO]2DC. GAPED
J L D < (FILE N0.138278-1016 I 5
/18/2011. IT IS SHOWN AS WO BEING LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD NAZAND AREA INUNDATED BY IoM-YEAR FLOGD.
-F� I I IY ��. O. P. R. L.C.T.)
}` Ut 3
APPROXIMATE LOCATION � j� G.
APPROXIMATE LOCATION J ( p
OF ZONE % - 0.15 ANNUAL < OF ZONE X - 0,25 ANNUAL
< i OIRVER,dAPPLICANT
CHANCE FLOOD HA RD I I APPROXIMATE `` I I CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD -_ p
LOCATION OF M�Y i I 8208 Northweitt O S st ,,t
ZONE AE -
RFINAL PLAT
1G
REGULATORY 1A
1 1 I I LCODWAY I COO: R TX 76432
I I I ""Pham JWz= as 48448 `p RICARDO RAMIREZ ESTATES
BEING LOT 9, BLOCK 119-A
AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF PARIS
LAMAR COUNTY, TEXAS
I (7-c,s=E j. i em 0.14 ACRES
b
610 W AUSTIN ST ,
ChalDnon, nh al Paa. DoR� .._ _.... ................ LHS PARIS, TEXAS BY-LINE
ana zamnp ca 1pt { 1 SURVEYING LLC
H
...
:rh,r ' IoATE Ge/1e/1024 B n T )saw
"' r uL[• I-=1M'
Ph.(9D3)A siw
SCALE 0 120 - )� s ,
0 4D 8 � 3 SDzs-ssa ,w. byr ap.re�ypy3aam
Mayor, u°Pry I purls Ovt. - VICINITY MAP � ICLIENT: 111-DO RAMIREZ
SHEN 9„ -
NOT TO SCALE "T" (TECHNICIAN: AMN
Me''morandum Item No. 11
TO: Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
City Council
FROM: Todd Mittge, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of the River Oaks Subdivision II,
Lots 1, 2, and 3. Being part of River Oaks Subdivision Block B Lot 4 and 5,
LCAD: 104885 , on Aikin Drive. No address has ever been assigned.
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND
The applicant requests approval of a Final Plat in order to build single-family
structures. This is the Second Phase of a previous Subdivision.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat with the following condition:
1. Location of proposed lots, streets, alleys...., Minimum finished floor elevations for each
lot.... Chapter 9A, V Final Plat, Subsection 8.
a. Minimum Finished Floor Elevation of the proposed structure shall be shown on the
final plat.
Final Plat
River Oaks Subdivision
Phase H
0.826 Acres
Pan of City Block #294
City of Paris, Lamar County, Texas
The mdrpLt elQofu7mI, IWy
,noh1p&QfPa=O�P
ylev.6mlMd b th. My C—&ofP kTrr, w ft_6, or
. 2M41mdit Clry C..W lyflt[t.9 ed wtMnmd
Wii n lietby'evd Brcky Kerby ate arc
Vd. 11119, Page 211 OPR
bean
Pbcr, Wvretmmdeetvts Imt; rabo#v amdtxd dsthfm vnd4 nil
Ithm pmj ftyis—io the
vuP or pK vmd odd ComoB fthl—b igd the Mqm.—me
p-- N 4827'06' W
0.13'
ttooep[erce mdeafby dpdog bb tins u bedu#b— wh—lbaL
N 89'3 6'36" E""t'a}
270.07'
r
_..—..—.. �.N
70.00'
11 130.01'
M, slb t"www
r =fen eeod power ti-
ine
–"_--
S I
01.12'
h
tt
n
'1
Pone, Ta 754E l
Ch4mr PI®ivy inti ZoWn &.'6"Norm:.3-5173311
_
art
P
(q awBgg n,
Riser Oaks Subdivision I#ux 1
� ..............
t1 LOt 2
3
River Ovkv Subdkbim Plvrse 1
RI«kA-Ld}
0214 Acres 0.214 Ac e&
�
g' 0398 Acres
BlpckB-LLL4
env.374U
9331 2 aq ft 9332 B sq ft
�'+ aq ft
17325 2
Rev.37+D
1 I
... �...... ""
w
$ w
bl
w0 t
tl
e ep
Dmma cement
.n 111 Vd. 623, Page 14 DR tV
4
a WL7,'V LLC.
n 1 Dao #19}121L2t1220PR r`
Y
25' builJing seNock Ilse O
ih
___
_ -POB
Z
.______70.x.-______. .. �_______7D.�.____I'_
jry N
____129.62'_______________,
_iil.QQ___.-----
5 u tility_eavement
S 89'37 43 W 269.82'
25 00'
ct�mfe ABdelAhe aoW 5sr
The mdrpLt elQofu7mI, IWy
,noh1p&QfPa=O�P
ylev.6mlMd b th. My C—&ofP kTrr, w ft_6, or
. 2M41mdit Clry C..W lyflt[t.9 ed wtMnmd
thtm eempbd0edediremafvamb,Oe04.rvemrte.pablle
1?1 xry h Currently Zoned SFJtont-F—dyDwelling]
Pbcr, Wvretmmdeetvts Imt; rabo#v amdtxd dsthfm vnd4 nil
Ithm pmj ftyis—io the
vuP or pK vmd odd ComoB fthl—b igd the Mqm.—me
ttooep[erce mdeafby dpdog bb tins u bedu#b— wh—lbaL
0" yi" copped iro pin Ioune
aurveY Ilse
Owned Dcvckt
am ii" i n pin /ound
– eenwnt/bullding 11h
City Ewbe:3 tpfyY'p1ewB,Tmr
M, slb t"www
r =fen eeod power ti-
ine
–"_--
P.O. Box 6792
Apr am
Pone, Ta 754E l
Ch4mr PI®ivy inti ZoWn &.'6"Norm:.3-5173311
■- chnen Ilnk p�Oet tound
— .— IAm
,7'eau
P
(q awBgg n,
or
ofP b.
I light Pole
lf—Y
pped
C.r 10YA .red.
Oi—tmdmmy IbW d.Wimfo6ev, dm
s ,+k✓r^''
Nodty Ft6lJq SnyeafT'm,r__..,,,, ,......, ......__
um cnnv
Iiefrvmmn begun.
cell S l l m oink'Ilutilitie,
Ficw N-- O.W Anes
Sitwmd within,M limns of the Ciy ufpuru, iv IM
Cuumynf Lantan Sm,eof Texas, vp—'ftlte Joseph Lech
Survey #524 and being a tins of InN cwveyul n W1,7, Ur
by decd n—u ie Doc.#195128-'_c22 ufit,, Off7,dd Nbli
R—IMI ofvoid 0—Y uM S. , id —1 W.gJnwn.
Phew B F_D-6p—., M1M Rionf 9thdivivm
Phen 1 mcunkd in H-374-0 oft PW RmnNs ofavid
C.—Y..
ourcy and 5lnu:.
Beginning m v ri"inn pin huntl orJm.Snmhwe,t.,nnr
A
oftMW,I.I,C tinct unJ Ming 1M Srtmhauwvnnuf n,3
in eirKk nfemJR' Ol Suhd Pb: ]amt being,n
the Nanbuundvy I f AM. Dr 15tf gm fwnyy
Thence Nrt°4 (IrW J of 13329na 1} inn
ren fwnd e, fM Nnrdtw'c,rcnme nF the WL7, U.0 toe, std
the NunenN currxa of Lu 3 arc] hang in tM Suudr —w y
line of a cellod I nese tmc,cumey" to Wnyne Ker y and
Becky Kerby by decd record.] in Vnl. I849. Peg, 711 11,W d
Mf ci.J Public Ru—!
Thence N 993E3E E ,h d271J.D1'l,gm
N -h—, rmer ofh W171dCtrxr, fmm wbihvchain
,ilk pont fuutW M N W27 fA W, dnmvice ul'tl I wd
be tag the Nnnhw - f La 4 m Bkak Bufv:dd Raen
Ovkv Subdtautnn Pha 1
In,.. s11"3712 E da--fW',,IVW
bun pm found'lthr Gmthrnat m -Wft WL7, LLf tmu
and the Southwest comm of nail Lut4 wW being in the Nun
buutvlury line of Aikiu Drive;
]fianceS89']7'43" W ukmg.mdwritn di—u1
269.87 to the point of Mgimting vnd wtwhing 11876 aura of
land.
Nac:
1?1 xry h Currently Zoned SFJtont-F—dyDwelling]
Ithm pmj ftyis—io the
Him ie Diopt
Felne Building Develop—will nvvc Finished FI.,rEkvakns vhmnn on Site Plan
0" yi" copped iro pin Ioune
aurveY Ilse
am ii" i n pin /ound
– eenwnt/bullding 11h
�= X4' iron Ptn round
®- ±h' iron found
r =fen eeod power ti-
ine
–"_--
re !�D STEp
pn
Q = hob -n concrete eat
0-
®• boa d'art t lourq
– ntlergrauM telephon
sr alar
'
�r HAYDF 1
�p
■- chnen Ilnk p�Oet tound
tl1 : tNephone pedestal
® m fro hydrant
P
(q awBgg n,
®my hghwW m.,ker found
0a 3h iron Pn
I light Pole
36PVY".
pped
C.r 10YA .red.
pob >• point or begnoir,%
s ,+k✓r^''
Iln/2tV'4
H 4 ,aler RPLSMSE9Y sore
1, Hay'don Foatcr. Rcge[cmd PmmvakuW LmJ $,uvcyor,Na. WJ9
m n,mnr sanity rMt tna pmt and.>•rmtwming Deld rcx..
mpmnnma r an IM Fnn,na w�,ay male wormy dk„t
sulw-rvinim. ReaemeM1 nfrsnNed Jrxvmmna wxs mndennty Frcthc
purpwc ufdctcrm'ning tM boundary of duo pmperty mW,M
ado n'ng pnrcek 0.ecmd drmamvtls NM1nthan thnu•vMwnmthn
urvcy ,my cvivt vnd nncumMrthin pmpury.TMrc tlucantappnvtn
M any cncmvchmcnn tRMr Jmv thorc drown hucunT M mwv due
npfvnrm M in n Floral xmtc acmNing to tM Fl.d invuntn,v
R. Map M4R277CI132DC for lam,rvCrrmtty, Tevvn Refcmnm
cruris% _,he North M,u Nvey line of Aikn D,i.e wJ Mtngd,pvuA
u.s89"1 8 W. Ma I.ding Mvxtumenbi dthe mootm,ofIM
Referent W Si,, g .W F.. #j0jW tes pmv dud w:n dt,s suvuy
F�stcr LutW Surveying Fvmp10191]?5
Item No. 12
t
TO: Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
City Council
FROM: Todd Mittge, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of the Rodriguez 98 Addition, Lots
1, City Block 98, Lot 1. LCAD: 15469, 913 711 NW & Henderson Street.
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND
The applicant requests approval of a Final Plat in order to build a single family
structure. This was a non -platted City Lot and Block.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat with no conditions.
OF TEXAS
ITY OF LAMAR
Before me, the undi nYgned authority, a Notary Public In and tar the mid County and State, on this
ersonal appeared going in "' " ""_"""—'' knotvll to me to De the persene whose names
bsa!bed t heforesimmenidndseknowiidged jo me thetthey to='tetlsemetrconstderatiun
ex seed
Given under my hand antl seal of office. this day of _._ .AD 2024
Notary Public, State of Texas
Owner and Developer
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
16051st Street NE
Paris, Texas 75460
(903)495-8367
FINAL PLAT
�'�� 9tf W'aa V
LOT 1, BLOCK A
1.244 ACRE
N
�t
FIELD NOTES OF LOT 1 OF THE RODRIGUEZ 98 ADDITION
E
All that cede n tract o parcel of land situated within the Corporate Limits of the City of
Parte, In Lamar County. Texas: part of the Larkin Rotten Survey, Abstrect No. T78.
.�
ntlbeing a part of Lot i in Block 98 ofthe CW of Paris, as shown on the -recorded Plat,
�^1��T�,T T'a'y'
-+IENDERSON STREET (Ba row -WD
4
Page 4, fthe Lots. Blocks, and Additions Records of the City of Pans('), and also being a
Ians..se.. '
I '
part of the celled 13.595 acre tract of land tlese scifind In a Dead t JoAntonio Rodnguez,
r
and recorded In Document 1-2017, of the Official Pu blk Record, of Lamar County. and
^ =: a10'E `-
N89'S .f
being more padicu iuly described as tltwa, to coil:
160.0001 -------
s
1" 50'
Beginning at a 112-rebar (set) for a comer in a South Line of Henderson Street NW, same being
(hem Northerly Northwest comer ofeeld 13.595 acne tract, and same also being the Northwest
>
connmr'fa called 313' x 339' tract of land described in a Deed to Enna Vre
emue, LLC, and mcord-
I I H
ed In Document 192073-2022, of the Official Public Records of Lamar County;
Thence N 89.53' 1 VE with a North Line of mid 13.595 acre tract and with a Scutal, Line of said
Hendmsen Street, a distance of 160.00a, to a 1l2'rebar (set) for a mrner in a South Line of
Mid Henderson Street, and same being in a North Line of said 13.595 acre tract;
Zonin g "— PO-----'
"_ .�—•�—' ,
Thence S 01'24'12"W over said 13.595 acre tract, a distance of 338.82T, to a 112 rebar (sell
for a corner within sem 13.595 acre tract.
w__ ______ _
---- --""----'"-" ' O
The S 89' S3' 1R W over said 13.595 acre bact, a distance of 160.000. to a 12" caber
rd)rota mmm, same being an Inside mer o
( rnf said 13.595 sate tract, and sumo elm being
the Southeast tamer of said 313' x 339' tract:
I
Thence N 01' 24' 12' E with a West Line of said 13.5% acre timctantl wlih the East Line of seid
SIT, 339' tract, a dimunce of 336,827, to the Plena of Beginning and cenfaining 1244 saes of Ian.
ur
N It 1.244 acre Pcoo I u
Lot 1, Block A rveyore note:
Booc
utility locations per City Base
Map 9-7-22 AC
The bearing, noted herein are Need upon the most Northerly West Line of said 13.595 acre
Roddguez tact, being N 01'24' 12' E.
o min0 55,
z°� I and actual locations have not
been field verified
I, Wendell J. Moore, Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 5723, State of Texas, cedly that
the above Plat and Field Notes depict
hjOh I
and represent an actual survey made on the ground and under
my supervision and completed July 18, 2024,
Il
'i
*a" I �"•• i
I I
We tl IIJ Moore RPLS 5723
f I Q)b
Engineering Firm lO a ENG7577204
! I
for hammnca only, not a legally binding documentI
I I
L� C m
. S 89'53'10' W
Acommuce
160.00a `al
The undeml d, the C' Clerk
City City
the C' Paris, Texas,
1 y scow Ler
of of hereby certifea that the bre, 202 ,pled'
to I
was submitted to the City Council of Parie, Texas, an the day of 2024, and said
City Council by formal action then and there accepted I, and said City Council diner aWhor-
his mut
laed the Mayor b nolo acceptance thereof, by signing his name as herein below wbsmibetl.
a b
.per's Cedlficate
City Clark, City of Pads, Texas date
(w)-_ ,,.., hereby certify as them:
(1) That I (we) own in fee the property which is the subject of this plat. M the event of liens or
Approved
encumberamcee,I(we) have provided Procter lender concurrence for this development:
Charm Planning8,2 Commission
(2) That I (m) have caused this plat to be prepared, that it 1, authentic, and accurate to the
ng tlale
best of our knowledge;
(3) That I (we) do hereby dedicate the atresia, alley,, easements, water and sewer utiliUm,
antl drainage facilities provided within or for this developm,nL t the City of Paris. Texas:
end
(4) That I(we) warrent to workmanship and materials used i n the benstructlon of all water.
App d ,.d. ......... ,,,,,,,,,"
and drainage facilities, an pavements, for a period of one year horn the data of
plat approval by the City.
Mayor, City or Paris, Texas data
OF TEXAS
ITY OF LAMAR
Before me, the undi nYgned authority, a Notary Public In and tar the mid County and State, on this
ersonal appeared going in "' " ""_"""—'' knotvll to me to De the persene whose names
bsa!bed t heforesimmenidndseknowiidged jo me thetthey to='tetlsemetrconstderatiun
ex seed
Given under my hand antl seal of office. this day of _._ .AD 2024
Notary Public, State of Texas
Owner and Developer
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
16051st Street NE
Paris, Texas 75460
(903)495-8367
FINAL PLAT
�'�� 9tf W'aa V
LOT 1, BLOCK A
1.244 ACRE
Item No. 13
Memoran�dum
TO: Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
City Council
FROM: Todd Mittge, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of The Ranches at Twin Lakes
Addition, Lots 1-59, LCAD 71680, 71923, 715679, 70240, and 403541, Located
in the ETJ.
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND
The applicant requests approval of a Final Plat in order to subdivide existing lots
and develop in the ETJ. The owner is creating 59 lots, approximately 10 Acres
each in the subdivision for single family homes. City of Paris is required to
consider plats in the ETJ per County Code and our current Subdivision
Ordinance. This is being been approved by the PNZ and is being considered
concurrently by the County Commissioners Court.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat with no conditions.
---------
--t 7. AND -M. BEFORE HE, . —1 Public M ad
fm Lie Stole of T-
-1 .tidae —1-
------ --- — ---
----------------- ---
_1
21 TM.9
IE
Z��EE
—E
—11— 1a Tore
=In= E"Ew—' 4TE :4 5 2 6 —,*T
I'll —1 111 DE111 I
,A- — - —1 - - . —1 -- . . .
ld (-1
d--
I 4tl 1,
—T I
—_ - - ----------------
x' lv'Al Pb"f
l'OR Rl:'VlUll NJIF"'Pol";F"',� CiNt-'l,
FINAL PLAT
THE RANCHES
AT TWIN LAKES
J. THOMAS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. .936
P THO
_ MASSU9VEY. ABSTRACT NO. 937
r . LAT 'SlJRVRY, ABSTRACT NO. 533
IMF
R
AN ADDITION IN THE ETJ OY PARIS.
LAMAR COUNTY, TEXAS
SHEET 3 OF 3
NIGNWAT 74 1 BY LIVE
012LE PPUCANT
TWEN LAKES
W. LLC
................ .
(Coni u9-I�"zaeRUB°9
Z. -1
A. um tI
LOT 56
m.ol ACRES ,I \
11 LOT 55
10.01 ACNES
Id
1 lDT 54
1001 ACRES
5'1
1111 oll
10.01T4.
ALRE9 }9��✓ �I i ZNpy ''� . IAT�I \� ��
LOT 32✓'_�„L.
' IBA, ACRES
��°` ✓✓ LOTS
T oer c,,'"' Lm\`
lo.Bl ACR:s
_,F ..
Ip.BI ACRES ,�"� �
..w .. o
F�I� LOT
dli� wl 1e.s.r r.+'�,',A'•6 } a'! '^•✓ 10.81 ACRES,
XX
6/ r
fi \\ \ \\ .✓
TO AI ACRES
'— — — \ '3 ✓"') � p'3' "\ Ar"t aAr ",� LIRE „��) � )C �,
LOT
+I
ACRES 10.01 TIE ACRf,N:a°125Or
10.01 S
LOT Rs 11 � ,
I i
I�I 10.01T ACRES — ...!
1
fERE NOS �'o'aR�c).B
/
/
y u nuE
e� 7., r"'r / u xeo• tt E tseo 5
LOT ]
a0[Ili.
r � 9eP1 1
LOA
T37 "r" 1 1 1? SSrs913 E - ¢
MOT
t
mow.,, _ ul saslxs eaa
�. 4y,G y Jr, L1a N]E383 'W B1
Ll m.0 T I
CNEs 1•i �."'q'y"11 4
LT. 513]C50 a ( I30 >4
)a uB"lsar 1�.W %9 BB ,
S�i q 'r1Y� .F�'/ .L1M1 L9eS450!E ST 199
t r� tY�F:LI 35JOD 05^N 1 1'
�O
* S e lOT e9 \NY. �y d 1 LPO I ^N SO3
10.01 A[Rf3
it
„d A1 L11 sarse 5o'w Imp?,�
JE> /E \ ,La] 501•tx aY m,tsQ„1
slxs'.
t,oeSSP 7—
(rl[Iin�nK MbT x�ce �I� �1vdr�11
/ ”,/R3��,LdR"R FJ JAL i:alAA
Ct 119 5x 3.59 98 PST3e' 951 35 a91V 119 N
C2 65 >D A# Y 39)
Ca 9109 _t 49Ve 11 N 599Ry'R 0160
p POC RRO
I,vm�E�H SIT A j 2 1ff.e
-,C • E5
1013
5
FINAL, PbAT
THE RANCHES
AT TWIN LAKES
J. THOMAS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 936
R. THOMAS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 937
C. LATIMER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 533
AN ADDITION IN THE ETJ OF PARIS.
LAMAR COUNTY, TEXAS
SHEET 2 OF 3
C CR 21800 A
�
HIGHWAY �V LI46
TEXAS SURV EVINO LLC
eu I
7—
AMAGe 1NO I10 LAIS ,���nV e
Item No. 14
TO: Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and City Council
Robert G. Vine, Interim City Manager
FROM: Stephanie H. Harris, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Return of donated funds as provided in the Amendment to Memorandum of
Understanding between the City of Paris and the RAM Foundation
DATE: September January 22, 2024
BACKGROUND: In December of 2021, the RAM Foundation (RAM) made a sizeable donation
of $300,000.00 to the city for the use in the city's HOME program to further RAM'S program of
making affordable housing available to the city's residents. In conjunction with that donation, the
parties entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) which provided that the city would
continue its annual funding for the program and would exhaust those budgeted funds prior to
accessing the donated funds. The MOU also provided that after the expiration of three years, RAM
would be able to review the use of the donated funds, and, if less than half of the funds had been
used, recoup all of the unused funds. In January of this year the city and RAM amended the MOU
to read in pertinent part:
RAM reserves the right to recoup portions of the RAM funds which
the City has neither expended nor dedicated to a particular future
HOME or HANC project, such recouped funds to be used by RAM
for other affordable housing initiatives. In order to exercise this
right, RAM shall make written request to the City, and the City shall
determine whether unexpended and undedicated funds are available
to honor the request. If funds are available, the City shall promptly
return the requested funds to RAM. RAM has the right to inquire as
to the balance of any donated funds at any time, and the City will
respond promptly to any such request.
Since the city's acceptance of the donation and the execution of the MOU, the city has not had
occasion to tap into the donated funds. At the time the above amendment was approved and
executed, RAM requested that the city refund $191,227.84, and the city provided that refund.
STATUS OF ISSUE: On September 11, 2024, RAM requested in writing the return of any
unexpended and undedicated funds under the terms of the amendment. The remaining balance of
the donation is $108,772.16, funds which RAM intends to use in its own housing initiative.
BUDGET: No impact.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the refund of funds remaining in RAM's original donation of
$300,000.00 in the amount of $108,772.16 in accordance with the January 24, 2024 MOU
amendment.
RAM FOUNDATION
September 11, 2024
City of Paris
ATTN: Stephanie Harris
135 SE 1St Street
Paris, TX 75460
RE: HOME Program
Dear Stephanie:
This letter is provided as a written request regarding the Amendment to Memorandum of
Understanding dated December 15, 2021, between the City of Paris, Texas and the RAM
Foundation and the funds originally submitted to the City. The RAM Foundation would like to
formally request the recoupment of all RAM funds which the City has neither expended nor
dedicated to a particular future HOME or HANC project.
We appreciate your cooperation. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Mandeep Chatha-Homer
Executive Director
PO Box 1339 817-404-2429 2305 Clarksville Street
Paris, Texas 75461 director@ramfoundation.net Paris, Texas 75460
AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
DATED DECEMBER 15, 2021 BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS AND THE
RAM FOUNDATION
WHEREAS, the on or about December 15, 2021, the City of Paris, Texas ("City') and the RAM
Foundation (RAMI, collectively referred to as the "Parties," entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding (the "MOU") to set forth the terms a of the use of funds to be donated by RAM to
the City to assist in alleviating the need for affordable housing within the corporate limits of City;
and
WHEREAS, to that end, RAM donated the sum of $300,000.00 under the terms and conditions
set forth therein to be used by City in the administration of the HOME programs for the provision
of affordable -income housing; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2021, the City Council of the City of Paris, Texas accepted RAM's
donation by Resolution No. 2021-049; and
WHEREAS, the MOU was a non-binding document setting out the anticipated roles and
responsibilities of the Parties to effectuate the intent of the donation from RAM Foundation; and
WHEREAS, the MOU provided that RAM could recoup unused portions of the donated funds on
or after the third anniversary or the execution of the MOU; and
WHEREAS, as of the date of execution of this Amendment, the City has not had cause to draw
upon the donated funds; and
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to provide for RAM's recoupment of unused portions of the
donated funds for the purposes of its own affordable housing initiatives:
THEREFORE, to that end, the Parties hereby agree to amend the MOU (this
"Amendment) as follows:
Pare�aph 22.1 o is hereb amended to read as follows:
2.1 ...
(b) RAM reserves the right to recoup portions of the RAM funds which the City
has neither expended nor dedicated to a particular firture HOME or HANC
project, such recouped funds to be used by RAM for other affordable
housing initiatives. In order to exercise this right, RAM shall make written
request to the City, and the City shall determine whether unexpended and
undedicated funds are available to honor the request. If funds are available,
the City shall promptly return the requested funds to RAM. RAM has the
right to inquire as to the balance of any donated fiords at any time, and the
City will respond promptly to any such request.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date
below their signatures.
Foundation
Title:
Date:
City of Paris, Texas
15
By: Grayson Path
Title: City anager t
Item No. 15
Memorandum
TO: Mayor, Mayor Pro -Tem, & City Council
FROM: Robert Vine, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Discuss and Approve Agreement with Executive Search Firm Baker Tilly to
conduct a search for a Finance Director
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND: The City has advertised on its own and contracted with Strategic Government
Resources to create an informational brochure and share it with their clients to recruit a Finance
Director in anticipation of the retirement of current Finance Director Gene Anderson at the end of
this calendar year. These efforts have been unsuccessful to date.
STATUS OF ISSUE: The City has contracted with Executive Search Firm Baker Tilly to conduct
a search for the position of City Manager and has an opportunity to work with this firm to recruit
a Finance Director as well. At the request of Council, Staff has secured a proposal from Baker
Tilly for this recruitment effort (See Attachment A).
BUDGET: $24,255.00 will be pulled from the General Fund to cover this expense.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the agreement with Executive Search Firm Baker Tilly to
conduct a search for a new Finance Director in the amount of $24,255.00.
ba arta
Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP
205 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2800
Chicago, IL 60601
www.bakertilly.com
September 18, 2024
Robert Vine
City of Paris, Texas
135 SE 1 st Street
Paris, TX 75460
Dear Mr. Vine:
This letter agreement (the "Agreement") documents the City of Paris, Texas ("you/r" or "Client") engagement of
Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP ("we" or "Baker Tilly") to conduct an executive search for Finance Director (the
"Project"). This Agreement defines the parties' respective obligations for the Project.
Scope, Objectives and Approach
The scope and phases of this engagement are as follows:
ME
Phase I Task 1_7 Develop the candidate profile and define the advertising and marketing
T!
strategy.
Task 2 — Identify qualified candidates that meet the profile.
Phase Task 3 — Screen and submit Task 4 — Conduct reference list of recommended
and dsemifinalists to client.
hse II
academic verifications. A criminal and/or
credit history report may also be conducted at this Phase or at the conclusion of Phase
III, as specified by you.
Phase III Task 5 — Final process/on-site interviews with finalists.
Task 6 — Assist Client in making offer, which may be made contingent upon the
successful completion of a background check as specified by you.
Conclusion Acceptance of offer by candidate.
Project Timing and Budget
The Project will commence upon your execution of this Agreement and will remain in effect for the period
necessary for successful completion of the Project.
1. Edward Williams will lead the Project, and other professionals will be involved as required. The all-inclusive
professional fee to complete the Project is $24,255 (the "Fee") and includes the cost of professional
services by the Project Team Leader and the project support staff, and all project -related expenses such as
advertising, candidate background and reference checks, and travel expenses for on-site visits by the
Project Team Leader. Travel expenses incurred by candidates for on-site interviews with the Client are not
Baker Tilly US, LLP and Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP, trading as Baker Tilly, operate under an alternative practice structure and are
members of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities.
2024 Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP
the responsibility of Baker Tilly and shall be handled directly by the Client. The Client will make payments
upon receipt of an invoice submitted by Baker Tilly. Payment to Baker Tilly is due upon receipt. All invoices
will be forwarded to the Client for processing unless otherwise directed. For reporting purposes, Baker
Tilly's tax identification number is 99-1405547.
2. The Fee will be billed in four installments; 30% of the Fee will be billed upon execution of this Letter; 30% at
the implementation of Phase I; 30% at the implementation of Phase Il; and the final 10% upon acceptance
of offer by the candidate. The Fee is not contingent. If you terminate this engagement before completion,
Baker Tilly shall invoice you for any unpaid portion of the Fee.
3. If Client requests Baker Tilly to perform additional services beyond the services described above, such as
conducting an employee/community survey or making additional on-site visits, such additional services
shall result in additional fees. For an employee/community survey, the additional fee shall be $1650. For
additional on-site visits (beyond the three on-site visits which include four consulting days) described above,
the additional fee would be an hourly rate of $300 plus expenses.
Client's Obligations
1. You agree that you are responsible for candidate selections and that you will not discriminate against any
candidate on the basis of age, race, creed, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, disability,
marital status or any other basis that is prohibited by federal, state or local law.
2. If you decide to not hire a candidate as a result of a criminal or credit history report, you agree to
comply with the FCRA with regard to any pre- or post -adverse action notices and requirements.
3. You agree to respond to drafts of documents and reports in a timely manner. Failure to do so on your part
will protract timelines and can negatively influence the outcome of the process.
Management's Responsibilities
It is understood that Baker Tilly will serve in an advisory capacity with Client. The Client is responsible for
management decisions and functions, and for designating an individual with suitable skill, knowledge or
experience to oversee the services we provide. The Client is responsible for evaluating the adequacy and
results of the services performed and accepting responsibility for such services. The Client is responsible for
establishing and maintaining internal controls, including monitoring ongoing activities.
The procedures we perform in our engagement will be heavily influenced by the representations that we
receive from Client personnel. Accordingly, false representations could cause material errors to go
undetected. The Client, therefore, agrees that Baker Tilly will have no liability in connection with claims based
upon a failure to detect material errors resulting from false representations made to us by any Client personnel
and our failure to provide an acceptable level of service due to those false representations.
The ability to provide services according to timelines established and at fees indicated will rely in part on
receiving timely responses from the Client. The Client will provide information and responses to deliverables
within the timeframes established in this Agreement unless subsequently agreed otherwise in writing.
The responsibility for auditing the records of Client rests with the Client's separately retained auditor and the
work performed by Baker Tilly shall not include an audit or review of the records or the expression of an
opinion on financial data.
The executive search for the Financial Director is considered a non -attest service. As a part of this service, we
will not perform any management functions or make management decisions on your behalf.
Baker Tilly US, LLP and Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP, trading as Baker Tilly, operate under an alternative practice structure and are
members of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities.
2024 Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP
In connection with our performance of this non -attest service, you agree that you will:
Continue to make all management decisions and perform all management functions.
Designate an employee with suitable skill, knowledge, and / or experience, preferably within senior
management, to oversee the services we perform.
- Evaluate the adequacy and results of our non -attest services.
Establish and maintain internal controls, including monitoring ongoing activities related to the non -attest
function.
Terms and Conditions
1. To the extent allowed under applicable law, the aggregate liability (including attorney's fees and all other
costs) of either party and its present or former partners, principals, agents or employees to the other party
related to the services performed under this Agreement shall not exceed the fees paid to Baker Tilly under
the portion of this Agreement to which the claim relates, except to the extent finally determined to have
resulted from the gross negligence, willful misconduct or fraudulent behavior of the at -fault party.
Additionally, in no event shall either party be liable for any lost profits, lost business opportunity, lost data,
consequential, special, incidental, exemplary or punitive damages, delays or interruptions arising out of or
related to this Agreement even if the other party has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
2. Each party recognizes and agrees that the warranty disclaimers and liability and remedy limitations in this
Agreement are material bargained for bases of this Agreement and that they have been taken into account
and reflected in determining the consideration to be given by each party under this Agreement and in the
decision by each party to enter into this Agreement.
3. Neither this Agreement nor any rights or obligations hereunder shall be assigned or delegated by Baker
Tilly without your prior written consent. This Agreement shall be modified only by a written agreement duly
executed by you and Baker Tilly. Should any of the provisions hereunder be found to be invalid, void, or
voidable by a court, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, Baker Tilly may assign and transfer this Agreement to any successor that acquires all or
substantially all of the business or assets of Baker Tilly by way of merger, consolidation, other business
reorganization, or the sale of interests or assets.
4. Copies of all hard copy documents associated with the recruitment will be retained for three (3) years from
the anniversary date of the hiring of the candidate. Retention of records beyond three (3) years must be
requested in writing before the conclusion of the Project.
5. Baker Tilly US, LLP and Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its subsidiary entities provide professional
services through an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional
Conduct and applicable laws, regulations and professional standards. Baker Tilly US, LLP is a licensed
independent CPA firm that provides attest services to clients. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its
subsidiary entities provide tax and business advisory services to their clients. Baker Tilly Advisory Group,
LP and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its
subsidiaries and Baker Tilly US, LLP are independent members of Baker Tilly International. Baker Tilly
International Limited is an English company. Baker Tilly International provides no professional services to
clients. Each member firm is a separate and independent legal entity and each describes itself as such.
Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and Baker Tilly US, LLP are not Baker Tilly International's agents and do
not have the authority to bind Baker Tilly International or act on Baker Tilly International's behalf. None of
Baker Tilly International, Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP, Baker Tilly US, LLP, nor any of the other member
firms of Baker Tilly International has any liability for each other's acts or omissions. The name Baker Tilly
and its associated logo is used under license from Baker Tilly International Limited.
6. FORM 1295: Baker Tilly, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas, will execute and file Form
1295, notice of interested parties, which can be found on the website of the Texas Ethics Commission at
..
7. MANDATORY ANTI -DISCRIMINATION AND OTHER PROVISIONS: Baker Tilly acknowledges this
Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate. Pursuant to Section
Baker Tilly US, LLP and Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP, trading as Baker Tilly, operate under an alternative practice structure and are
members of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities.
2024 Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP
2271.002 of the Texas Government Code, Baker Tilly certifies that either (i) it meets an exemption criterion
under Section 2271.002; or (ii) it does not boycott Israel and will not boycott Israel during the term of the
Agreement. Baker Tilly acknowledges this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this
certification is inaccurate. Pursuant to SB 13, 87th Texas Legislature, Baker Tilly certifies that either (i) it
meets an exemption criterion under SB 13, 87th Texas Legislature; or (ii) it does not boycott energy
companies, as defined in Section 1 of SB 13, 87th Texas Legislature, and will not boycott energy companies
during the term of the Agreement. Baker Tilly acknowledges this Agreement may be terminated and
payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate. Pursuant to SB 19, 87th Texas Legislature, Baker Tilly
certifies that either (i) it meets an exemption criterion under SB 19, 87th Texas Legislature, or (ii) it does not
discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association, as defined in Section 1 of SB 19, 87th
Texas Legislature, and will not discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association during the
term of this Agreement. Baker Tilly acknowledges this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld
if this certification is inaccurate. Pursuant to Subchapter F, Chapter 2252, Texas Government Code, Baker
Tilly certifies that Baker Tilly is not engaged in business with Iran, Sudan, or a foreign terrorist organization.
Baker Tilly acknowledges this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is
inaccurate.
Acknowledgment
If this Agreement correctly sets forth your understanding, please sign below and return one copy to us for our
files. We look forward to working with you on this important project.
Sincerely,
Anne Lewis I Managing Director
Client Signature:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Baker Tilly US, LLP and Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP, trading as Baker Tilly, operate under an alternative practice structure and are
members of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities.
2024 Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP
Item No. 16
VATY , 17 mo � M
To: Mayor, Mayor Pro -Tem & City Council
FROM: Interim City Manager Robert G. Vine
SUBJECT: Receive Presentation on the transition to CARDS for the Commercial Solid
Waste Services and Discuss
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND: On September 20, 2023, the City entered into a Municipal Solid Waste
Collection, Transportation and Disposal Contract (for residential and commercial) with CARDS.
This agreement listed CARDS as the sole residential collector of solid waste beginning February
1, 2024, and designated them as the sole commercial collector beginning on September 1, 2024.
STATUS OF ISSUE: CARDS is in the process of establishing their commercial services per the
agreement and will provide an update on their progress.
This item also includes an opportunity for Council Members to discuss the transition, ask questions
of the CARDS representative, address concerns, and share information related to commercial
collection for the purpose of obtaining the expected level of service outlined in the initial
agreement.
BUDGET: Discussion Only
RECOMMENDATION: Presentation and discussion only.
Item No. 17
M ,, .
_rR#T.. rii
TO: Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and City Council
Robert G. Vine, Interim City Manager
FROM: Stephanie H. Harris, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Amendment of Tax Abatement Agreement dated June 27, 2002 between the City and
Lionshead Paris, LLC
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND: The City entered into a Tax Abatement Agreement (the "Agreement") with
Lionshead Paris, LLC (the "Owner") on June 27, 2022. Under the terms of the Agreement, the
City grants the Owner a seven year de-escalating tax abatement on a $20,000,000.00 investment
in the construction of a manufacturing and distribution facility for the assembly and distribution
of tire and wheel assemblies. Owner also pledged to create 15 full-time equivalent positions. The
Agreement specifies that the improvements were to be completed by December 31, 2023.
STATUS OF ISSUE: The owner has requested an extension of the completion deadline from
December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024. As of this writing, the improvements are substantially
complete.
BUDGET: No impact.
RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt a resolution approving an amendment to the Tax
Abatement Agreement with Lionshead Paris, LLC extending the completion of improvements date
to December 31, 2024.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO A TAX ABATEMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARIS AND LIONSHEAD PARIS, LLC;
MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris did heretofore, on the 10th day of
January, 2022, in Resolution No. 2022-002, elect to be eligible to participate in tax abatement
agreements in order to maintain and enhance the commercial and industrial economic and
employment base of the Paris area for the long term interest and benefit of the City and its
citizens; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council readopted said guidelines on January 8, 2024 in
Resolution No. 2024-001; and
WHEREAS, on or about June 27, 2022, the City entered into a Tax Abatement
Agreement (Agreement) with Lionshead Paris, LLC ("Owner") pursuant to its authority
under Chapter 212 of the Texas Tax Code; and
WHEREAS, said Agreement provides a deadline of December 31, 2023 for Owner to
complete of the improvements set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, Owner has requested an extension of said deadline until December 31,
2024;and
WHEREAS, the Owner has substantially completed said improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the city and its
citizens to amend the Agreement to provide said extension;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS,
TEXAS, THAT:
Section 1. The findings set out in the preamble to this resolution are hereby in all
things approved and are incorporated herein for all purposes.
Section 2. That the terms of the Amendment to the Tax Abatement Agreement
between the city and Lionshead Paris, LLC and the property the subject thereof meet the
City's Guidelines and Criteria for Tax Abatement adopted by the City of Paris by Resolution
No. 2024-001 and will lead to the economic development of the Enterprise Zone.
Section 3. That the terms and conditions of the proposed Amendment attached
hereto as Exhibit A, having been reviewed by the City Council of the City of Paris and found
to be acceptable and in the best interests of the City of Paris and its citizens, be, and the same
are hereby, in all things approved.
Section 4. That the
• is hereby authorized to execute the Amendment and
all other documents in connection therewith on behalf of the City of Paris substantially
ric r4e te-r-tisg-id co-tiditio-ts set forth in the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibil
Section 5. That the planned use of the property the subject of the amendment will
not constitute a hazard to public safety, health, or morals.
Section 6. That this approval and execution of the Amendment on behalf of the
City is not conditioned upon approval and execution of any other tax abatement agreemen-o
• any other taxing entity.
Mijir Pankaj, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janice Ellis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Stephanie H. Harris, City Attorney
Exhibit A
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF LAMAR
AMENDMENT TO TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARIS,
TEXAS AND LIONSHEAD PARIS, LLC DATED JUNE 27, 2022
This Amendment (the "Amendment") to a Tax Abatement Agreement (the
"Agreement") to a tax abatement granted by the City Council of the City of Pairs is entered
into by and between the CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, a municipal corporation, situated in Lamar
County, Texas, acting by and through its authorized officer whose signature appears below
(hereinafter called "City"), and LIONSHEAD PARIS, LLC, acting by and through its
authorized officer whose signature appears below (hereinafter referred to as "Owner").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris, Texas did heretofore, on the 27th day
of June, 2022, in Resolution No. 2022-047 grant to Owner the Agreement attached hereto as
Exhibit A and attached hereto by reference as if fully set forth herein; and,
WHEREAS, Owner has requested an extension of the deadline to complete the
Improvements required therein;
WHEREAS, construction of the Improvements is substantially complete; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City of Paris and
its citizens to extend deadline by which Owner must complete all Improvements from
December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024 and to extend the Abatement Period so as provide
owner with the full Abatement Period contemplated in the Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Chapter 312 of the Texas Tax Code and the
Guidelines and Criteria for Tax Abatement adopted in Resolution No. 2022-002, the parties
hereto do mutually contract and agree as follows:
Section 1.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:
1.1 The effective date of this Agreement is the 27th day of June 2022, with the tax
abatement being effective from and after January 1, 2024 2025. or January 1St of the
year immediately following the completion of construction, and terminating on
December 31, 2030 2031 (an abatement period of seven (7) years (the "Abatement
Period")). Said Abatement Period will terminate on December 31, 2938 2031, regardless of
when Owner completes the Improvements described in Sections II and III herein below.
Section 10.1 and 10.2 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows;
10.1 Initial Report: The Owner further agrees that it will, by April 15, 2024
2025, provide the City with a sworn report, written on Owner's letterhead and signed by
a designated representative of Owner, which contains the following information relating
to the improvements completed in the year 2023 2024:
(a) A copy of the printout from the Lamar County Appraisal District showing the
market value of the Property as of January 1, 2022, prior to the construction
of the Improvements;
(b) Detailed description of the Improvements;
(c) A detailed description of any miscellaneous items of office equipment and
the actual cost of such added office equipment;
(d) A copy of or identification of plans and specifications of constructed
improvements and the location of the same for inspection by City's
certification team;
(e) A detailed list of and the actual cost of added machinery and equipment;
(f) The actual cost of capital Improvements; and,
(g) The date of substantial completion of the Improvements as defined in
paragraph 3.1 hereof.
10.2 Annual Report on Compliance for Each Year of the Abatement Period:
In addition to the report required in Paragraph 10.1 hereinabove, Owner further agrees
that by April 15th of each year of this Agreement beginning in the year 2025 2026, it will
provide the City with an annual sworn report which shall certify, in writing, that it is in
compliance with each applicable term of this Agreement. Such annual report shall be
furnished in the form attached hereto asi it 5 and incorporated herein by reference
and shall reflect the prior fiscal year. Owner shall attach thereto copies of the employer
reference summary page of its Texas Workforce Commission Employer's Quarterly
Reports for the calendar year immediately preceding the date of the annual report
required by this section, and the report shall contain a sworn statement signed by the Plant
Manager or an Officer of the Company certifying that the information provided in the
summary page is a true and valid report filed with the Texas Workforce Commission.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective
as of the date set forth below.
WITNESS our hands this — day of 2024.
THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
By
.._. Mihir Pankal,......._....._� �.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Janice Ellis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Stephanie H. Harris, City Attorney
LIONSHEAD PARIS, LLC
2
ATTEST:
Title:
Date:
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF LAMAR
TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT
This Tax Abatement Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into by and between the
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, a municipal corporation, situated in Lamar County, Texas, acting by
and through its authorized officer whose signature appears below (hereinafter called "City"),
and LIONSHEAD PARIS, LLC, acting by and through its authorized officer whose signature
appears below (hereinafter referred to as "Owner").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris did heretofore, on the 10th day of
January, 2022, in Resolution No. 2022-002, elect to be eligible to participate in tax abatement
agreements in order to maintain and enhance the commercial and industrial economic and
employment base of the Paris area for the long term interest and benefit of the City and its
citizens; and,
WHEREAS, under the Texas Enterprise Zone Act (Texas Government Code Chapter
2303), and the Redevelopment and Tax Abatement Act (Texas Tax Code Sec. 312.2011) the
designation of an area as an Enterprise Zone also constitutes designation of the area as a
reinvestment zone (the "Reinvestment Zone"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the 2020 Census, the Property within City of Paris, Lamar
County, Texas, is included within an Enterprise Zone, as is shown in the print-out from the
Office of the Governor of the State of Texas on its website in Exhibit IL attached hereto and
made a part hereof for all purposes; and
WHEREAS, Owner has agreed to make the Improvements specified herein, said
Improvements related to the construction of a manufacturing and warehousing facility for
the assembly and distribution of tires and wheel assemblies; and
WHEREAS, the Owner has agreed to create and maintain at least fifteen (15) full-time
equivalent employment positions; and
WHEREAS, the contemplated use of the Improvements as hereinafter defined, in the
amount as set forth in this Agreement upon and within the Property, and the other terms
hereof are consistent with encouraging development of said Enterprise Zone in accordance
with the purposes for which it was created and are in compliance with the City's policy on
tax abatement incentives and the ordinance creating such Enterprise Zone adopted by the
City and all applicable laws; and
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Chapter 312 of the Texas Tax Code and the
Guidelines and Criteria for Tax Abatement adopted in Resolution No. 2020-002, the parties
hereto do mutually contract and agree as follows:
0
W
rrA-"111Y.t
2030 (an �batement period of seven (7) years (the "Abatement Period")). Said
Abatement Period will terminate on December 31, 2030, regardless of when Owner
completes the Improvements described in Sections 11 and III herein below
IL
The "Property" - Area to be Improved
2.1 The Improvements defined in paragraph III below and made the subject of t
Agreement shall be located on the Property located in Paris, Lamar County, Texas Plant ar
described in Exhibit 2. attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, whi
Property is within the Enterprise Zone. I
3.1 The Owner shall construct and operate an assembling andwarehousing plant
including approximately 120,000 square feet under roof to be used in its business of
assembling tire and wheel assemblies (herein called the "Improvements") at the Property
located in Paris, Lamar County, Texas, which Improvements are more particularly described
cff—A.Aarter n-offf-Wt-sA==
oil1 (41
L Me bildil EM UUMPIMeLl PFLUF LU JWMVM�-�,=,TT!Mv
said improvements shall be described in the City's Certificates of Completion defined in
Section X, "Reporting Requirements." For the purposes of the default provision of this Tax
Abatement Agreement (Section V), the Improvements will be deemed completed upon the
issuance by the City of Certificates of Occupancy for the structures included in the
Improvements, Once Owner has applied for said Certificates of Occupancy, the City shall not
unreasonably delay the issuance of same. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, Owner
shall have such additional time to complete the Improvements as may be required in the
event of "force majeure" if Owner is diligently and faithfully pursuing completion of the
Improvements. For this purpose, "force majeure" shall mean any contingency or cause
beyond the reasonable control of Owner including, without limitation, acts of God, any
natural disaster, war, riot civil commotion, insurrection, governmental or de facto
governmental action unless caused by acts or omissions of Owner, fires, explosions,
accidents, floods, and labor disputes or strikes.
3.2 The Owner agrees and covenants that it will diligently and faithfully, in a go
and workmanlike manner, pursue the completion of the Improvements. As good a
valuable consideration for this Agreement, Owner further covenants and agrees that
construction of the Improvements will be in accordance with all applicable state and local
laws, codes, and regulations, or Owner will procure a valid waiver thereof. In further
consideration, Owner shall thereafter, from the date a Certificates of Occupancy for the
structures on the Property are issued or the Improvements are completed as agreed until
the expiration of this Agreement, continuously operate and maintain the Property and the
Improvements as a tire and wheel assembly and warehousing plant.
IV.
Consideration
Jobs
4.1 The City has provided in its Guidelines and Criteria for Tax Abatements, that
in order to be eligible for a tax abatement, a new employer must make a minimal capital
investment of $1,000,000.00 and create at least ten (10) new jobs. Owner herein has
committed to a minimum investment of $20,000,000.00, and has committed to creating at
least fifteen (15) and up to forty (40) new full-time equivalent with benefits positions with
an estimated direct payroll of approximately TWO MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS
($2,000,000.00). These fifteen (15) full-time equivalent with benefits positions shall be
created and staffed within one (1) year of the City's issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
4.2 In order to qualify for the tax abatement provided for herein, Owner must both
create said fifteen (15) full-time equivalent positions according to the above schedule and
retain those positions throughout the remaining years of the abatement period.
V.
Default
5.1 In the event that (a) the Improvements for which an abatement has been
granted are not completed in accordance with this Agreement or the expenditure for the
Improvements does not meet the amount required herein; or (b) Owner allows its ad
valorem taxes owed the City to become delinquent and fails to timely and properly follow
the legal procedures for protest or contest of any such ad valorem taxes; or (c) Owner fails
to create and retain the required full-time equivalent positions set forth herein and on the
schedule set forth herein; or (d) Owner materially breaches any of the other terms and
conditions of this Agreement, then this Agreement shall be in default. In the event the Owner
defaults in its performance of either (a), (b), (c), or (d) above, the City shall give the Owner
written notice of such default. If the Owner has not cured such default within sixty (60) days
of said written notice, this Agreement may be modified.or terminated by the City. Notice
shall be in accordance with paragraph 13.3. As damages in the event of default, in accordance
with the requirements of Section 312.205 (a)(4) of the Tax Code of the State of Texas, all
taxes which otherwise would have been paid to the City without the benefit of abatement,
together with interest to be charged at the statutory rate for delinquent taxes a determined
by Section 33.01 of the Tax Code of the State of Texas, with all penalties permitted by the
Property Redevelopment and Tax Abatement Act and the Tax Code of the State of Texas, shall
be recaptured and will become a debt to the City and shall be due, owning, and paid to the
City within sixty (60) days of the expiration of the above-mentioned applicable cure period
3
as the sole remedy of the City, subject to any and all lawful offsets, settlements, deductions,
or credits to which Owner may be entitled.
VI.
Tax Abatement
6.1 Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and subject to the rights
and holders of any outstanding bonds of the City, a portion of ad valorem Property taxes
from the Property otherwise owed to the City shall be abated. Said abatement shall be an
amount equal to the following percentages of the taxes assessed upon the increased value of
the Improvements made by Owner to the Property described in Section III of this Agreement,
over the value in the year which this Agreement is executed (the "Base Value"), in accordance
with the terms of this Agreement and all applicable state and local regulations or valid
waivers thereof, provided that the Owner shall have the right to protest or contest any
assessment of the Property and said abatement shall be applied to the amount of taxes finally
determined to be due as a result of any such protest or contest;
Year 1
100%
Year 2
100%
Year 3
75%
Year 4
75%
Year 5
50%
Year 6
50%
Year 7
25%
For the purposes of this Agreement, the Base Value of the existing real property shall be
deemed to be the value as shown on the tax rolls of the Lamar County Appraisal District as
of January 1, 2022.
6.2 The abatement granted herein shall be subject to and governed by the Criteria
and Guidelines for Tax Abatement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit .4....and
incorporated herein by reference, save and except that, in the event of a conflict between the
requirements of Ex Ibit4 and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control.
6.3 Owner covenants and agrees that subsequent to the date of this Agreement,
any application by Owner for a new tax abatement for equipment or real property located
within the Property and the Enterprise Zone applicable to this Agreement shall be subject to
and governed by the City's Criteria and Guidelines for Tax Abatement in effect at the time of
the new application.
VII.
No Conflict of Interest
7.1 The Owner represents and warrants that the Property does not include any
Property that is owned or leased by a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
4
City of Paris, nor by a member of the City Council approving, or having responsibility for the
approval of, this Agreement.
VIII.
Conditions
8.1 The terms and conditions of this Agreement are binding upon and enforceable
against and with respect to the successors and assigns of all parties hereto.
8.2 It is understood and agreed between the parties that the Owner, in performing
its obligations hereunder, is acting independently; the City assumes no responsibility or
liability in connection therewith to third parties; and Owner agrees to indemnify and hold
the City harmless therefrom. It is further understood and agreed among the parties that the
City, in performing its obligations hereunder, is acting independently; the Owner assumes
no responsibility or liability in connection therewith to third parties; and, to the extent
permissible by law, the City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Owner therefrom.
IX.
Compliance Provisions
9.1 Civ s Richt of Access to Records: The Owner agrees that the City, its agents
and employees, shall have the reasonable right of access to records concerning the Owner's
investment in the Improvements for the purpose of conducting an audit of the Project
Improvements and Project costs. Any such audit shall be made only after giving the Owner
at least fourteen (14) days advance written notice and will be conducted in such a manner
as to not unreasonably interfere with the operation of the facility. Upon request, the Owner
will provide the City with a detailed Asset Report with•an itemized list of assets placed into
service from the date of execution of this Agreement to the date of completion. The Asset
Report will provide for each asset a unique serial and/or other identification number (if
available), the date on which the asset was capitalized, the acquisition amount, and the
accumulated depreciation amount. At the City's request, the Owner will provide actual
invoices to support the amounts shown on the Asset Report.
9.2 Cm's Rights of Access to Property: The Owner further agrees that the City,
its agents and employees, shall have reasonable right of access to the Property to inspect the
Improvements in order to insure that the construction of the improvements is in accordance
with this Agreement and all applicable state and local laws and regulations or valid waiver
thereof. After completion of the Improvements, the City shall have the continuing right to
inspect the Property to insure that it is thereafter maintained and operated in accordance
with the Agreement during the term of the Agreement. All inspections will be made only
after giving the Owner written notice at least seventy-two (72) hours in advance, and such
inspections shall be conducted in such a manner so as not to interfere with the operation of
the facility. Representatives of the City inspecting the Property and Improvements shall be
accompanied and by one (1) or more representatives of the Owner and shall sign an
Agreement promising to maintain the confidentiality of any information they obtain in
connection therewith except for the purposes of assessing and collecting ad valorem taxes
and verifying or enforcing compliance with this Agreement, or as otherwise required by lai2
Said representative shall also be required to observe any facility rule and regu ad
he
,I Pri rWein shall be construed as limitin
Isms wN son 4 sunwag Irgi 11 1111 . I I
10.1 Initial RgUgM The Owner further agrees that it will, by April 15, 2024;
provide the City with a sworn report, written on Owner's letterhead and signed by
499!g2ii re7)i:P-sP-x�-21hw *N, -w-kP-.rA0d6j in UJ*
the improvements completed in the year 2023:
(a) A copy of the printout from the Lamar County Appraisal District showing the
market value of the Property as of January 1, 2022, prior to the construction
of the Improvements;
tb) Detailed description of the Improvement?,
c) A detailed description of any miscellaneous items of office equipment anl,
the actual cost of such added office equipment;
(d) A copy of or identification of plans and specifications of constructed
improvements and the location of the same for inspection by City's
certification team;
(e) A detailed list of and the actual cost of added machinery and equipment;
(f) The actual cost of capital Improvements; and,
(g) The date of substantial completion of the Improvements as defined in
paragraph 3.1 hereof.
turnisned in e 5 in
and shall reflect the prior fiscal year, Owner shall attach thereto copies of the employer
reference summary page of its Texas Workforce Commission Employer's Quarterly
Reports for the calendar year immediately preceding the date of the annual report
'A -f� U 5R.- it 1"*6�iiiii lorl,?, ---4 tatem—e—n—ts—i G,�ned-bv, th e Plant
Manager or an Officer of the Company certifying that the information provided in the
summary page is a true and valid report filed with the Texas Workforce Commission.
10.3 The reporting requirements and deadlines set forth herein are an integral
and material part of this Agreement, and Owner acknowledges that failure to timely
submit any report or sworn statement required herein is a breach and default of this
Agreement as set forth hereinabove. Owner further agrees to timely submit said reports
and/or sworn statements without prompting by the City.
10.4 Owner shall submit all compliance reports required to by this section via
certified mail, return receipt requested, to:
City of Paris
c/o Office of the City Attorney
P.O. Box 9037
Paris, Texas 75461-9037
Alternatively, said reports may be delivered personally to the Office of the City Attorney at
135 SE 1st St., Paris, Texas 75460.
Xl.
City's Certificate of Completion
11.1 Within thirty (30) days of receipt of each Annual Report on Improvements
required by paragraph 10.1 hereinabove, or as soon thereafter as practicable should the City
require additional information from the Owner, the City shall:
(a) review same for compliance with the terms of this Agreement;
(b) verify that the Improvements identified in the Report and required by the
terms of this Agreement have been completed;
(c) and, if the required Improvements have been made, deliver a Certificate of
Completion in the forms attached hereto as EXh hi o and executed by the
Mayor to the Chief Appraiser of the Lamar County Appraisal District. The City
shall attach to said Certificate of Completion a copy of the information
provided by Owner in its Annual Report on Improvements as an identification
of the Improvements upon which the tax abatement is to be granted.
11.2 In the event that the City requires additional information in order to conduct
the review and verification contemplated by paragraph 11.1 hereinabove, the City shall
notify the Owner of same as soon as is practicable, but no later than thirty (30) days after
receipt of the Annual Report on Improvements.
11.3 Nothing in this section shall prohibit the City from exercising its right to declare
Owner in default or Owner's right to cure same in accordance with the terms of Section V
hereinabove.
N
12.1 This Agreement was authorized by resolution of the City Council at iu,
the Agreement on behalf of the City.
12.2 This Agreement was entered into by Lionshead Paris, LLC pursuant to the
authority granted to the authorized official whose signature appears below.
12.3 This Agreement shall constitute a valid and binding Agreement between the
City and Owner when executed in accordance herewith, regardless of whether any other
taxing unit executes a similar Agreement for tax abatement.
awj' V1 ILS COnUiLlOnS UF LU uniF Lne ULJ Uj' MaK111j; any promise or
representation not contained herein.
13.2 This Agreement, except by operation of law, shall not be assigned or
transferred by Owner, without the prior written consent of City, which consent shall be a -v
the sole discretion of the City.
13.3 Any written notice required or permitted under the terms of this Agreement
shall be given and be deemed to have been duly served if either (1) delivered in person, or
(2) deposited certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid in the United States
mail, addressed to the designated representative of the respective parties which are
designated as follows:
OWNER:
Lionshead Paris, LLC
M6-
305 Steury Ave.
Goshen, IN 46528
0
CITY:
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
Attn: City Manager
P.O. Box 9037
Paris, TX 75461-9037
With a copy to:
City Clerk, City of Paris, Texas (address same as above)
City Attorney, City of Paris, Texas (address same as above)
13.4 If any term or provision of this Agreement shall be declared unconstitutional or void
by any court of competent jurisdiction, the constitutionality and validity of the remainder of
said Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and to this end the terms and provisions of this
Agreement are declared to be severable.
13.5 This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding between the parties, and any
other understandings or agreements shall be canceled and superseded by this Agreement
upon the date of execution hereof. None of the terms of this Agreement shall be waived,
discharged, altered or modified in any respect, except by an Agreement in writing signed by
both parties and specifically referring to this Agreement. The captions in this Agreement are
included for convenience only and shall not be taken into consideration in any construction
or interpretation of this Agreement or any of its provisions. This Agreement is performable
in Lamar County, Texas, and shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of Texas. The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to, bind and
inure to the benefit of the City, Owner, and their respective successors, and permitted
assigns, if any.
13.6 Venue for any actions arising under this Agreement shall lie exclusively in the courts
of Lamar County, Texas for any State Court action, and in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas for any federal court action.
13.7 Owner and the City have both contributed to the drafting of this Agreement, and no
ambiguity, if any, contained in this Agreement shall be construed against either party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as
of the date set forth below.
WITNESS our hands this day of 2022.
THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
Mayor
V1
ATTEST:
ce Ellis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
........................................... .
Step B :nie H. Harris, City Attorney
LIONSHEAD PARIS, LLC
Title:
ATTEST:
Title:
10
ATTEST:
Janice Ellis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Stephanie H. Harris, City Attorney
LIONSHEAD PARIS, LLC
By:
Date: .M�.°
,f
ATTR ",ST
Title:
10
LIST OF EXHIBITS:
2020 Designation of Enterprise Zone which includes the Property
2. Map of the Property and Property Description
3. Description of Improvements
4. Resolution No. 2022-002; Criteria and Guidelines for Tax Abatement
5. FORM: Certificate of Completion
6. FORMS; Certificates of Compliance
11
WWI
1. 2020 Designation of Enterprise Zone which includes the Property
2. Map of the Property and Property Description
3. Description of Improvements
4. Resolution No. 2022-002; Criteria and Guidelines for Tax Abatement
5. FORM: Certificate of Completion
6. FORMS: Certificates of Compliance
IF
N
.L
cc
CL
nm
^W^
♦i
�YrJ
L
0
1
1
N
c
0
N
N
�L
i
N
c
W
Wl0
L
H
io
Field Notes
Being a 19.58 acre tract of land in the Francis Morrison Survey, Abstract No. 592 and the John
Herrington Survey, Abstract No. 436, in the City of Paris, Lamar County, Texas; being all of the former
Lot 1, Block A of Northwest Paris Industrial Park, as recorded in Envelope 386-C, L.C.P.R.; and being
part of that certain tract of land described in deed to Paris Economic Development Corporation, dated
November 18, 2003, recorded in Vol. 1403, Pg. 53, L.C.O.P.R, said 19.58 acre tract of land is more
particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap found in the south right-of-way line of Loop Highway 286
(width varies according to Vol. 36I, Pg. 157 and Vol. 557, Pg. 643, L.C.D.R.) for the northwest corner of
Lot 2 of said Block A and the most northerly northeast corner of the herein described tract, from which a
1/2 -inch iron rod with cap found in the south right-of-way line of Loop Highway 286 for an angle point in
the north boundary line of said Lot 2 bears North 71 deg. 22 min. 13 sec., a distance of 175.65 feet;
1.) THENCE South 22 deg. 09 min. 59 sec. East, along the west boundary line of said Lot 2, a distance
of337.75 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap found for the southwest corner of said Lot 2;
2.) THENCE North 68 deg. 59 min. 47 sec. East, along the south boundary line of said Lot 2, a distance
of 215.09 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap found in a curve to the right in the west right-of-way line of
30th Street NW (80 feet wide according to Env. 386-C, L.C.P.R.) for the southeast corner of said Lot 2'
3.) THENCE along the west right-of-way line of 30th Street NW as follows: with said curve to the right
having a radius of 915.00 feet, a central angle of 26 deg. 51 min. 10 sec., an are length of 428.83 feet, and
a chord that bears South 17 deg. 21 min. 51 sec. West, a distance of 424.92 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod
with cap found for the end of said curve to the right; South 30 deg. 49 min. 42 sec. West, a distance of
22.81feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap found for the beginning of a curve to the left; with said curve to
the left having a radius of 1030.00 feet, a central angle of 18 deg. 07 min. 28 sec., an arc length of 325.82
feet, and a chord that bears South 21 deg. 42 min. 43 sec. West, a distance of 324.46 feet to a 1/2 -inch
iron rod with cap found for the end of said curve to the left and the beginning of a curve to the right; with
said curve to the right having a radius of 14.00 feet, a central angle of 89 deg. 22 min. 15 sec, an are
length of 21.84 feet, and a chord that bears South 56 deg. 56 min. 07 sec. West, a distance of 19.6 feet to a
1/2 -inch iron rod with cap found in the north right-of-way line of Park Street (80.00 feet wide at this point
according to Env. 386-C, L.C.P.R.);
4.) THENCE North 77 deg. 39 min. 34 sec. West, along the north right-of-way line of Park Street, a
distance of35.95 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap found for an interior corner of Northwest Paris
Industrial Park;
5.) THENCE along the most westerly south boundary line of Northwest Paris Industrial Park as follows:
North 76 deg. 48 min. 33 sec. West, a distance of 83.99 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap found for the
beginning of a curve to the left; with said curve to the left having a radius of 2240.00 feet, a central angle
of 15 deg. 56 min. 17 sec., an arc length of 623.11 feet, and a chord that bears North 84 deg. 36 min. 51
sec. West, a distance of 62 1. 10 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap found for the end of said curve to the
left; South 87 deg. 25 min. 49 sec. West, a distance of 126.44 feet to a found 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap;
North 85 deg, 54 min. I 1 sec. West, a distance of 100.12 feet to a found 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap; North
89 deg. 38 min. 23 sec. West, a distance of 127.67 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap found in the
monumented east right-of-way line of 34th Street NW (monumented width varies; no dedication found)
for the southwest corner of Northwest Paris Industrial Park;
6.) THENCE along the monumented east right-of-way line of 34th Street NW and the west boundary line
of Northwest Paris Industrial Park as follows: North 02 deg. 39 min. 40 sec. East, a distance of 266.74
feet to a found 1/2 -inch iron rod; North 01 deg. 50 min. 56 sec. East, a distance of 110.98 feetto a point in
a curve to the right in the south right-of-way line of Loop Highway 286 for the northwest comer of said
Block A, from which a found 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap bears South 01 deg. 50 min. 56 sec. West,
distance of 0,29 feet, and a TxDOT Type I concrete monument found in the south right-of-way line of
Loop Highway 286 bears South 50 deg. 53 min. 46 sec. West, a distance of 190.74 feet;
7.) THENCE along the south right-of-way line of Loop Highway 286 as follows: with said curve to the
right having a radius of 2697.79 feet, a central angle of 15 deg. 34 min. 25 sec., an are length of 733.29
feet, and a chord that bears North 60 deg. 42 min. 32 sec. East, a distance of731.04 feet to a TxDOT Type
I concrete monument found for the end of said curve to the right; North 68 deg. 19 min. 28 sec. East, a
distance of 386.24 feet to a set 1/2 -inch iron rod with cap stamped "RPLS 5469"; North 71 deg. 22 min.
13 sec. East, a distance of 24.73 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 19.58 acres of land.
LIONsHE.AD
Lionshead Specialty Tire & Wheel LLC (Lionshead), a family-owned business, is experiencing significant
growth in the manufacturing sector. Our headquarters is located in Goshen, Indiana with rapidly growing
production facilities in Indiana, Texas, North Carolina, Idaho, Georgia and Minnesota. We specialize in the
development, manufacturing, and distribution of tire and wheel assemblies and component parts for the
recreation vehicle, marine, livestock, cargo, and utility trailer industries.
Our intense focus on customer experience and satisfaction levels is made evident in our customer service
and quallty products. We make it a priority to reinvest in new products and services to consistently
provide the best value exchange in a constantly changing environment.
At Lionshead, we focus on being best -in -class by providing a first-class working environment, retaining
and developing talented employees, operating our business with integrity and character, valuing our
employees by helping them become the best version of themselves, and giving back to our community.
We are excited for the opportunity to be part of the City of Paris and Lamar County and serving the
towable trailer and recreational vehicle industry throughout Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas,
Kansas and Louisiana. The organization plans to build a 120,000 sqft plant in Paris, Texas. This green -field
development will include investments in property, plant and equipment over $20,000,000 and bring over
40 new jobs to the area over a 5 -year period.
We believe the environment in which our team members work is an important part of our corporate
culture. This includes an emphasis on state-of-the-art humanities and space that supports employee
welfare. This includes the thoughtful use of windows to bring natural light into every work area,
cleanliness throughout, terrazzo floors, personal lockers, an inviting employee lunch room, expansive
bathrooms, focus on safety, and Lionshead provided complementary uniforms and personal protective
equipment. Lionshead also offers every team member competitive pay, benefits (medical, dental, vision),
matching 401k, performance Incentives that subsidizes food and Lionshead SWAG and many other
unique cultural approaches that are rarely seen in a manufacturing environment.
Upon breaking ground, we expect the project will take approximately 18 -months to complete. Our
overall investment in the City of Paris and Lamar County is expected to be the following:
Overall Capital Investment
Land
$0
Building
$16,500,000
Equipment
$6,500,000
Total Capital
$23,000,000
Average Annual Salaries $2,000,000
4M
[,',,) ET��1,,,H noir
SALES AND STAFFING PROJECTIONS
Sales Asys (monthly)
Sales $ (monthly)
Sales Asys (yearly)
sales $ (yearly)
Personnel - Operations
Total Production
Personnel sales
To to/ Sales
Personnel • Salaries
Operations
Sales
Total Labor
STAFFING DETAILS
Texas Economic Development
X7024
2025
2026
2027
2028
15,556
17,778
20,000
22,222
24,444
$2,333,333
$2,666,667
$3,000,000
$3,333,333
$3,666,667
186,667
213,333
240,000
266,667
293,333
$28,000,000
$32,000,000
$36,000,000
$40,000,000
$44,000,000
30
32
35
37
40
4
4
4
4
4
$1,404,360
$1,483,400
$1,601,960
$1,681,000
$1,799,560
$477,000
$477,000
$477,000
$477,000 _
$477,000
$1881360
6,960,400
$2,078,960
$2,158,000
$2,276,560
STAFFING DETAILS
Avg Salary
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Operations
Plant Manager
$
90,000
1
1
1
1
1
Asst Plant Manager
$
70,000
1
1
1
1
1
Shipping Receiving Manager
$
55,000
1
1
1
1
1
CDLA Drivers
$
67,500
4
4
4
4
4
Production
$
39,520
14
16
19
21
24
Production - forklift
'$
41,600
3
3
3
3
3
Receiving Staff
$
39,520
4
4
4
4
4
Receiving/Shipping forklift
$
41,600
2
2 m
2
2
Total production
30
32
35
37
40
Sales
Regional Sales Manager
$
130,000
2
2
2
2
2
Market Analyst
$
67,000
1
1
1
1
1
Regional Sales Director
$
150,000
1
11
1
1
TotolSa/es
4
4
4
4
4
personnel- Salaries
Operations
$ 1,404,360
$ 1,483,400
$ 101,960
$ 1,681,000
$ 1,799,560
Sa les
$ 477,000
$ .m, m 477,000
$ 477,000
$ 477,D00
$ 477,000
ToItallabor
$ 1,881,360
$ 1,960,400
$ 2,078,960
$ 2,158,000
$ 2,276,560
Average salary per employee
$ 55,334
$ 54,456
$ 53,307
$ 52,634
$ 51,740
Average per hour basis
$ 26.60
$ 26.18
$ 25.63
$ 25.30
$ 24.88
2
w r
LIONSHEAD
Building
Building $ 15,000,000
Building Contingency (10%) $ 1,500,000
Total Building $ 16,500,000
Equipment and Furniture (3 -year Investment)
Items
Qty
Total
Air Compressors - Nitrogen System & Components
1
$
1,477,896
Airline Piping
1
$
300,000
Belt Conveyor (Prep Conveyors)
6
$
59,407
Roller Conveyor (Prep Conveyors)
1
$
25,786
Camera Security System
1
$
2,229
Morrisette - Shrink Wrap Machine
2
$
69,943
Landmark Security System
1
$
40,907
L/A Wheel Systems Inflation Machines_
2
$
800,000
Forklift Toyota 5000#
2
$
66,520
Forklift Toyota 6500#
1
$
39,000
Baler for Recycables
2
$
60,750
Office furniture/Breakroom/Conf. Room
1
$
246,114
FMH Stationary Conveyors (Receiving)
2
$
418,040
Tire Mounters
9
$
135,000
Big Ass Fans
1
$
54,559
Gorbel Crane- Lift Assist
1
$
59,681
A/V Equipment
1
$
12,859
ITSetup (Cable and lnternetnet Wiring&Equipment)
1
$
65,782
Cell Phone Coverage/Boosters - Teledata
1
$
27,802
Door Security system _ -
1
$
70,091
Guard Rails/Safety Gates/Pole Potectors
2
$
12,500
Production Work Tables/Podiums
1
$
9,375
Tools and Production Equipment
1
$
9,375
' Kitchen Appliances
1
$
6,250
Floor sweeper
1
$
27,723
Printers - Gordon Flesch
1
$
22,500
Pool Cars
2
$
100,000
Truck / Trailer (4)
4
$
11000,000
S®lar Panels
1
$
750,000
Contingency
$
500,000
Total Equipment and Furniture Investment
6,470,087
TOTAL ESTIMATED CAPITAL INVESTMENT
$
22,970,087
3
Ittv/,
�%
Xv
f i�/i!I Il�� / / l 1 l/ l� /,•��/ +�a%��n J"�" h v�V�lVA�,
1
i
a
9
F
1 I 1 1�• �� �1�1�v
04,
11! / / II I.!' 1� s� \ `��'. f �^r '► �,„ � I � 111,,\� e {� 4
fll!! J.,/lTj
♦j/llt�� I/�a11 �. pf �.���// •A tiJ/� � ���r II fsyl I�:�AA
-i; ` `� qqa 'bl Ifl Ift 1 \V1A
kr Yp i tial 1 4 p"f 1y i �\V1+
3R f
if
fp
� I /�1 fff {� ���`� �" ��h •� t�.�i/ •� � � 1� � �\\ �' r �� /fes ��� � %
l 1—
pl,.. 1�
1 Im, TM'
rE�# •gym I
:.�
a�
Jim
st
..
.... ........_W.. ..
.....,...,�.w �.._........ r-1
,�_
� _ �
a o
m my
i
I
OR
.................
I Kv
.. . ............
0
I
5
................ . ..... ----
.. . . .. .. . . . \ � � , / \ \<
gall
IN
)
� �{�
�
/ -a�,
��\
~ -
« )»
�a§
I�
� \
�
{/
a
0
I
5
................ . ..... ----
.. . . .. .. . . . \ � � , / \ \<
gall
0
5
tt
3
J�l
'i I
it
'i®®
, I
5
tt
RESOLUTION NO. _2022-002
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO .BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN PROPERTY
TAX ABATEMENTS AND APPROVING GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA FOR
GRANTING TAX ABATEMENTS IN THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS; MAKING
OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 312.002 of the Texas Tax Code requires local taxing units to state every
two years their intent to participate in property tax abatement agreements, and to adopt guidelines
and criteria for granting tax abatements, and to conduct a public hearing prior to said authorization
and adoption; and
WHEREAS, the City Council last adopted Criteria and Guidelines for Tax Abatement on
January 13, 2020; and
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2022, the City Council conducted a public hearing as required by
law; and
WHEREAS, after considering public comment, if any, at said public hearing, the City Council
of the City of Paris, Texas hereby reaffirms its intent to be eligible to participate in property tax
abatements in accordance with Chapter 312 of the Texas Tax Code and to adopt the Guidelines and
Criteria for Tax Abatement attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exp fb t A: and
WHEREAS, a three-quarters majority vote of the City Council of the City of Paris, Texas is
required to amend the Guidelines and Criteria for Tax Abatement; and
WHEREAS, the City Council elects to readopt the Guidelines and Criteria for Tax Abatement
adopted on January 13, 2013 without amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS,
TEXAS, THAT:
Section 1. The findings set out in the preamble to this resolution are hereby in all things
approved.
Section 2. The City hereby elects to be eligible to participate in a property tax abatement
program and approves and adopts the Guidelines and Criteria for Tax Abatement attached hereto
and incorporated herein as Exh i tA.
Section 3. This resolution shall become effective from and after the date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of January, 2022.
Paula Portugal, Mayor c
Ellis, City Clerk
Stephanie H. Harris, City Attorney
(Updated 01-10-2022)
POLICY STATEMENT
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FORTAXABATEMENT
I. General Purpose and Objectives.
The City of Paris (City) and Lamar County Government (County) (collectively, herein called the
"Taxing Jurisdictions") are committed to enhancing the competitiveness and expansion potential of
local industry; to attracting and encouraging new manufacturing industry and investment; to
improving the City of Paris, Lamar County and its infrastructure, which attracts and supports
development; and, to expanding the tax base, employment opportunities, and the overall quality of
life for its citizens. Therefore, the governing bodies of the Taxing Jurisdictions will give
consideration, on a case-by-case basis, to providing tax abatements to the owners of real and
personal property forprojects that stimulate economic growth and diversification in the geographic
areas served by the Taxing Jurisdictions, according to state law and consistent with these policies,
criteria and guidelines.
Tax abatements may be made available to industrial, manufacturing, distribution, service facilities,
or any "primary jobs" creating industry as defined by the Economic Development Act of the State
of Texas. The facility must be currently in, or locating in the areas served by the Taxing
Jurisdictions, and located in a designated Enterprise Zone or Reinvestment Zone. New facilities
and structures as well as the expansion and modernization of existing facilities and structures, will
be considered. Evaluation of a tax abatement request will be based on the information provided in
the tax abatement application_ However, the City of Paris and Lamar County are under no
obligation to provide tax abatements to any applicant.
The Paris City Council acts as the lead entity for projects located in the City limits. The Lamar
County Board of Commissioners acts as the lead entity for projects in Lamar County, which are
located outside of the City limits. All governing bodies of the Taxing Jurisdictions have adopted
like policies, criteria and guidelines and will consider tax abatement requests that qualify
thereunder.
H. Definitions.
Definitions are provided as an Appendix A.
III. Designation of a Reinvestment Zone -
For any facility located within the area served by the Taxing Jurisdictions to be eligible for tax
abatement it must meet the criteria for designation as a tax abatement reinvestment zone as set forth
in the Property Redevelopment and Tax Abatement Act, Texas Tax Code Chapter 312. The City
or County may designate an area as a reinvestment zone in accordance with the criteria and
procedural requirements set forth in the Property Redevelopment & Tax Abatement Act, as
amended (Texas Tax Code Sec. 312.401 (b)). Pursuant to Texas Tax Code Sec. 312.2011,
designation of an area as an enterprise zone under Chapter 2303 of the Texas Government Code
constitutes designation of the area as a reinvestment zone without further hearing or procedural
requirements other than those provided under said Chapter 2303.
IV. Tax Abatement Authorized.
The Taxing Jurisdictions, through their elected governing bodies, may agree in writing with the
owner and/or lessee of taxable real and/or personal property that is located in a reinvestment zone,
but that is not in an improvement project financed by tax increment bonds, to exempt from taxation
EXHIBIT k
(Updated 01-10-2022)
POLICY STATEMENT
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR TAX ABATEMENT
a portion of the value of the real property, or of personal property located on the real property, or
both. The period of the abatement granted under the agreement shall not exceed the term authorized
bylaw. Such agreement will be based on the condition that the owner or lessee of the property
makes specific improvements or repairs to the property. An agreement may provide for the
exemption of the real property in each year covered by the agreement only to the extent its value
for that year exceeds the base year value. An agreement may provide for the exemption ofpersonal
property located on the real property in each year covered by the agreement other than personal
property that was located on the real property at any time before the period covered by the
agreement. Inventory or supplies cannot be abated as personal property.
Tax abatements may only be granted for additional value of eligible property improvements made
subsequent to and specified in an abatement agreement between the Taxing Jurisdictions and the
property owner or lessee subject to such limitation as the Taxing Jurisdictions may require. The
additional value must exceed any reduction in the fair market value of other property of the owner
already on the tax roll within the area served by the Taxing Jurisdictions. Change in appraised
value does not qualify for abatement except in an instance where a previously vacant authorized
facility is utilized. Value added to the tax rolls must come from actual capital expenditures.
The negotiation of tax abatement agreements will be conducted by the Paris Economic
Development Corporation's ("PEDC") executive director, in close consultation with the city
manager. In determining where and how tax abatements will be utilized, the executive director
will examine the potential return on the public's investment. Retum on public investment will be
measured in terms of (i) jobs created, (ii) jobs retained in cases of existing employers within the
Taxing Jurisdictions, and (iii) broadening of the tax base and expansion of the economic base (e.g.
capital investment, payroll, local spending, etc.).
V, Eligibility Criteria for Tax Abatement for Real and Personal Property
A property owner and/or lessee shall be eligible for tax abatement only upon the following criteria.
F�gli '_bgLtLCriteria for Tax Abatement _ _
AuthorizedTi- An authorized facility is used for manufacturing, research, regional distribution, regional services, regional
Facility tourist entertainment, other basic industry, or any primary jobs creating industry- (See Appendix A for
definitions.)
2. A new authorized facility must be created, or an existing authorized facility must be improved, modernized i
crexpanded.
3- If a leased authorized facility is granted abatement, the agreement may be executed with the lessor and/or
lessee, depending upon the particular circumstances of the proposed project. If the agreement is with the lessor,
lessor shall demonstrate binding contracts with the lessee to guarantee compliance with the terms of the
aereemeut.
Eligible 1. The property involved must be a newly created, or improvements to an existing, authorized facility.
Property a 2. Eligible property for which abatement may be granted includes nonresidential real property and/or tangible
personal property not located on the real property at any time before the abatement agreement becomes
effective.
3. Abatement may be extended to the value of buildings, structures, fixed machinery and equipment, site t
improvements, tangible personal property, and that office space and related fired improvements necessary
to the operation and administration of the authorized facility.
4. Inventory or sullies shall not be eligible for abatement.
Historic For historic property located in the City of Paris Historic District, see Chapter 30, Article IV of the City of Paris
i Property Code of Ordinances - Tax Exemption for Historically Significant Sites. Contact the City of Paris Community
(Updated 01-10-2022)
POLICY STATEMENT
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR TAX ABATEMENT
Deveiopment Department for additional information on these and other programs offered b�• the Citi• of Paris.
Value and 1. The governing bodies of the local 'faxing Jurisdictions will decide whether to grant a tax abatement to an
Term of applicant, and the amount, if any, of such abatement, on a case-by-case basis and in accordance with these
Abatement Policies, Criteria and Guidelines.
2. The term of abatements granted under any agreement may not exceed that permitted by applicable
state law.
3. The amount of the abatement shall be based upon a percentage (0 to 1000%) of all or a portion of the eligible
4.
property ME= the authorized facility.
Abatements may only be granted for the additional value of eligible real andpersonal property improvements
made pursuant to and listed in the agreement between the Taxing Jurisdictions and property owner and/or
lessee, subject to such limitations as the Taxing Jurisdictions may require.
5.
Real property tax abatement may be granted only to the extent that its value for each year of the agreement
exceeds its value for the year in which the agreement is executed.
6.
If a modernization project includes the replacement of improvements within an authorized facility, the value
eh ible for abatement shall be the value of the new u t(� less the value of the placed units .
- -
Abatement The
—
criteria used to evaluate a proposed project application for abatement includes, but is not limited to:
Evaluation 1.
The dollar amount of the increase in the tax roll.
Criteria 2.
The member of jobs created or retained by the employer involved
3.
The possible effect on attracting other taxable improvements into the Taxing Jurisdictions.
4.
The nature of and overall effect on the Taxing Jurisdictions.
(I
5.
The effect on the safety, health, and morals of the Taxing Jurisdictions' residents.
6.
Any substantial long -tern adverse effect on the provision of the Taxing Jurisdictions' services or tax bases.
7.
Meeting all relevant zoning requirements.
8.
Consistent with the comprehensive plan of the City of Paris and County of Lamar.
9.
The types and cost of public improvements and services (water and sewer main extensions, streets and roads,
S
etc.) required of the Taxing Jurisdictions.
10.
The i�X� and values of public. i_myarovem_ents to be funsished by the ap cant.
Economic To be eligible to receive tax abatement, the planned improvements:
Qualification 1.
Must be reasonably expected to iaerease the appraised value of the property.
f 2.
Must be expected to prevent the loss of employment, or assist in the retention or creation of jobs in the Taxing
Jurisdictions during the term of the agreement.
3.
Should not be expected to solely or primarily have the effect of merely transferring existing employment from
one part of the Taxing Jurisdictions to another without demonstration of increased future investment (dollars
or jobs) or unusual circumstances whereby without such a move employment is likely to be reduced.
4.
Must be necessary because capacity cannot be provided efficiently utilizing existing improved property when
reasonable allowance is made for necessan•�rovements or relevant govemmental actions_
_
Taxability_ During the term of the agreement, taxes shall be payable as follows:
I .
The base year of eligible property as determined each year by the Lamar County Appraisal District, shall be
2.
fully taxable.
The additional value of eligible property above the base year value shall be taxable in the manner described in
13.
the agreement
The Chief Appraiser of the Lamar County Appraisal District shall annually determine an assessment of the f
real and personal property comprising the reinvestment zone.
4. Each year, the employer, company or individual receiving an abatement pursuant to an agreement shall furnish
the assessor with such information as maybe necessary to determine the amount of any abatement.
5. Once such value has been established, the Chief Appraiser shall notify the affected Taxing Jurisdictions which
I levy taxes on such property and also notify the Paris EDC.
6. The employer, owner or lessee of eligible property requesting tax abatement within a reinvestment zone,
shall, prior to the commencement of eligible property improvements, agree to expend a designated sum of
I money and to create or retain a certain number ofjobs, or annual payroll as further defined below.
Capital Investinent, Payroll and it;r�n Criteria
(Updated 01-10-2022)
POLICY STATEMENT
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR TAX ABATEMENT
Atex abatement may be made available to employers who are increasing new capital investment and creating jobs with respect to
an authorized facility located anywhere within the area served by the Taxing Jurisdictions based on the following criteria.
1. To be eligible for any tax abatement, there must be a minimum capital investment in the authorized facility of $1,000,000 and
at least ten (10) new jobs added to the new employer's labor force.
2. Any project with a capital investment of more than twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000), AND accompanied by a
newly created minimum annual payroll of two and one-half million dollars ($2,500,000), OR creating more than two
hundred twenty-five (225) jobs will be individually negotiated.
3. As specified in state law, no abatement will be granted for more than 10 years and the total abatement shall not exceed
100%.
4. A newly created business must be (or will be) located within an enterprise zone or a designated reinvestment zone.
5. The taxing jurisdictions recognize a significant difference in the valuation of real property versus personal property.
Because of depreciation schedules, the abatement of personal property could result in a tax exemption. For this reason, the
P abatement schedule for personal property versus real property may be different. Each industrial account is looked at and
valued on an individual basis by the Lamar County Appraisal District (LCAD). The typical depreciation used for
industrial accounts by LCAD is as follows:
a. Computers — 3 year life
b. Furniture & Fixtures —10 year life
c. Vehicles — 7 to 10 year life (depending on type)
d. Machinery & Equipment —15 year life (maybe longer or shorter depending on the type)
16. For each abatement request the PEDC will evaluate the equipment (personal property) investment and useful life separate
from the real estate (real property) investment to determine the length of the abatement for each.
7. If personal property should become obsolete and be replaced while under an abatement agreement, the replacement
personal property is not eligible for abatement.
S. The churls below provide capital investment guidelines to qualify for tax abatement and the related schedule and
a
percentage of abatement.
For Capital Investment ($1M minimum investment AND 10 jobs
for Year 6 , ar 7
• 'obs for new em Flo err.
Amount of Investment Year 1 Year Z Year 3
_..-
$1,000,000 to $5,000,000 70% - 60% I 50% ; 40% _30% . 20% 10%
$5,000 001 to $20,000,000 _ 80% . _ _ 70% 60%f 50% 40% , _ 30% 2
$20,000,001 to $25,000,000 i _ 90% 60% 50°/a j 40% 30% 1
_
$25,000,001 and Above , Fb'r Pn jeets with capital investment above $25MA;VD $2.5Min newannuatlpnyrollOR i
creating more than 225 new jobs, the term and percentage of the abaremewt are both
negotiable, bid cannot exceed 10 rears or 100�/a _
9. An additional 20% abatement for new job creation is available based on the following requirements:
a, A project that creates a minimum of 10 new jobs.
u b. The new job wages are equal to or greater than the current County average wage for all private sector jobs excluding
retail trade and..
accommodation and food services .----�-. ($41,158 annually for 2013. Source: Texas Workforce Commission
__�....._-....__.....___ _.�_ . __�_._-• -- -
(Updated 01-10-2022)
POLICY STATEMENT
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR TAX ABATEMENT
via (Note: This represents 547 companies, 10,470 jobs and 56°10 of all private sector employment in
Lamar County.)
c. The taxing jurisdictions and the company must agree to include measuring, tracking and annual reporting of the net
job increases (existing jobs plus new jobs) for the entire term of the abatement agreement.
_.
For Net New Jobs (New Job Creation and Retention of Existing Jobs) _
1. 1, , ...... ... w
0 new obsxmmimum obs _ Y 20�° ' Ye 20% Y O o
_ Year 4 Year S 'Year 6 Yesr 7
— _
j * °° 2a°1° ... 20% 20°I° `2O-
2. New job wages = or > average annual
wages forprivate sector jobs in Lamar
County. (&dudwg retQ, accommodations, food
service. See Beni 4.b. above.)
3. Agree to maintain existing base and new
jobs during the entire term of agreement.
4. *Year 1 cannot exceed 100%.
VI. Tax Abatement for Eidsting Employers Regarding Real or Personal Property.
The Taxing Jurisdictions recognize the value of its existing employers to the well-being of the City
and County. The Taxing Jurisdictions desire to encourage existing employers to remain in the
Taxing Jurisdictions and to improve their respective businesses and industries, as well as their
profitability.
Accordingly, if an existing employer (as opposed to a newly created business or industry moving
into the Taxing Jurisdictions), owns or leases an authorized facility and has plans to improve such
property by constructing new improvements on its real property and/or adding new personal
property to its authorized facility which qualify for tax abatement under these Policies, Criteria and
Guidelines, such employer may be eligible for tax abatement with respect to such improvements to
its real property or its new personal property under the provisions of Article V above, even if no
new jobs or newly created minimum annual payroll are created.
In projects involving existing employers, the criteria for tax abatements for improvements to real
property and for new personal property at authorized facilities set forth in Article V above shall be
(Updated 01-10-2022)
POLICY STATEMENT
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR TAX ABATEMENT
waived, provided state law is fully complied with.
The local taxing jurisdictions encourage existing employers to retain as many jobs and as much
existing annual payroll as is economically feasible for the existing employer, while remaining
competitive in its industry.
VTC. Greenfield projects
In order to encourage the development of greenfield properties and also to be able to expedite
certain new projects, the criteria for tax abatements for improvements to real property and for new
personal property at authorized facilities set forth in Article V above shall be waived for projects
exclusively involving greenfield properties, provided state law is fully complied with.
VIII Ai o plica -tion Process
Aliplica6on Process
Eligibility Any present or potential owner of taxable property in the Taxing Jurisdictions may request tax
abatement by filing a written request with the City Manager or County Judge, with a copy of the
apLbcation forwarded b,' the applicant to the Executive Director of the Paris EIEC.
Form The application shall consist of a completed application form accompanied by the following:
1.
A general description of the improvements to be undertaken together with the projected new
value to the property and the type of business operation proposed.
2.
A detailed, descriptive list of the improvements for which abatement is requested.
3.
A list of the kind, number, and location of all proposed improvements of the property.
4.
A list of the number and type of jobs created, including information pertaining to anticipated
job transfers (if any). [
5.
A metes and bounds description and plat of the proposed reinvestment zone that shows an
roadways within 200 feet of the reinvestment zone and all existing zoning and land uses
within 200 feet of the reinvestment zone.
6.
A time schedule for undertaking and completing the proposed improvements.
7.
The type and value of any additional economic development incentives requested.
8.
Any other information about the proposed project as may be required by the Taxing
Jurisdictions or as deemed desirable by the Taxing Jurisdictions,
_
6 Review 1.
All applications will be initially reviewed by the PEDC executive director.
Process 2.
An initial project briefing meeting will be eonductedbetween the company's representatives,
the PEDC executive director, the city manager, and the county judge.
3.
The PEDC executive director will evaluate the request for tax abatement in accordance with
these criteria and guidelines and will make his/her recommendation to the Paris City Council
and Lamar County Commissioners Court for their review and possible approval.
4.
After the Paris City Council has been briefed on the proposed tax abatement offer and they
have directed the PEDC executive director to move forward, the Paris City Attorney will
the initial tax abatement agreement for review by the PEDC Board and representatives
idraft
of each Taxing Jurisdiction.
5.
Electronic versions of the City's abatement agreement will be provided to the County so all
agreements have consistent language, terms and conditions.
6.
Following review of the draft agreement, it will be sent to the applicant's legal counsel for
review and comment. Any changes requested by the tax abatement applicant will be
reviewed by the City Attorney.
7.
Once the Agreement is finalized, it will be placed on the PEDC Agenda for board
8.
recommendation. ;
Once the Tax Abatement Agreement has been acted on by the PEDC Board, the Agreement
shall be forwarded to the Paris City Council and Lamar County Commissioner's Court for
final consideration and action. __ _ _ ___ _
Public Hearing 1.
The Taxing Jurisdictions will comply with certain public notices and hearings required as
mandated by state law under the Pro ;nny Redevelopment and Tax Abatement Act prior 4o J
6
(Updated 01-10-2022)
POLICY STATEMENT
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR TAX ABATEMENT
the designation of a reinvestment zone and execution of a tax abatement agreement
2. The lead Taxing Jurisdiction (typically the City of Paris) may adopt an ordinance designating
a tax abatement reinvestment zone only after notice of a public hearing has been published at
least seven (7) days before the date of the hearing, and all other procedural requirements of
� ha ter 312 of the Texas Tax Code have been satisfied.
Findings In order to enter mto an agreement, the Taxing Jurisdictions must find that:
1. The terms of the proposed agreement comply with these Policies, Criteria and
Guidelines. �I
2. There will be no substantial adverse effect on the provision of Taxing Jurisdictions' services
or tax Mase.
3. That the planned use of the property will not constitute a hazard to public safety, health or
morals.
4. Incident to approval of any ordinance designating a reinvestment zone, the Taxing
Jurisdictions shall find that the improvements sought are feasible and practical and would be
a benefit to the land to be included in the reinvestment zone and to the Taxing Jurisdictions
after the expiration of the agreement
variances I Requests for variance from the provisions of these Policies, Criteria and Guidelines may be made
in writing to the Taxing Jurisdictions; provided, however, that in no event shall the term of any
abatement exceed the period authorizcd by applicable state law. Such request shall include a
complete description of the circumstanccs requiring a variance. Approval of a request for
variance shall require the afftmtative vote of three-fourths (3/4) of the members of each of the
Proposed r The adoption of these Policies,
Criteria .
Taxing, Jurisdictions Qovernur b
p p and Guidelines by the Taxing Jurisdictions does not limit
Agreements the discretion of the Taxing Jurisdictions' governing bodies to decide whether to enter into a
Decided on specific tax abatement agreement. Nor does it limit their discretion to delegate to their employees
Individual the authority to determine whether or not the Taxing Jurisdiction should consider a particular
Basis application or request for tax abatement, or create any property, contract, or other legal right in any
person or entity to have the Taxing Jurisdiction consider or grant a specified application or request
for tax abatement.
Vila. Abatement Agreement Terms and Conditions.
Appendix B provides many of the terms and conditions to be included in any formal tax abatement
legal agreement.
IX. Amendments to Policies, Criteria and Guidelines
These Policies, Criteria and Guidelines are effective for a two (2) year period from the date of their
adoption, unless amended earlier by the affirmative vote of three-fourths (3/4) of the members of
each governing body (City, County).
For a tax abatement application or additional information contact:
Paris Economic Development Corporation
1125 Bonham Street
Paris, Texas 75460
Phone: 903-784-6964
Fax: 903-784-2503
Website: www,Jparistexasusa.com
Email: parisedc!isatistexasusa,com
(Updated 01-10-2022)
POLICY STATEMENT
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR TAX ABATEMENT
APPENDIX A
Term
_
_ e.... _._._.. —
ition.
_
Abatement or Tax
_
The full or partial exemption from ad valorem taxes of certain real and tangible personal �
Abatement_PrOPerty
in a Reinvestment done designated for economic development. _ _ poses.
Agreement or
The written legal agreement for tax abatement between a property owner and/or lessee and the
Agreements
Citi of Paris, Lamar County and Paris Junior Collme.
Authorized
A facility may be eligible for abatement if it is a facility used for manufacturing, research,
Commercial or
regional distribution, regional services, regional tourist entertainment, other basic industry, or
Industrial Facility
any primary jobs creating industry (see definitions below). All authorized facility definitions
II ..ncJude buildings and structures, including fixed machinery and equipment used in operating
c the facilit3`_
1.
Authorized
The City Council of the City of Paris may also designate areas of the City where residential i
Residential Facility
properties may be considered for abatement of City taxes only. The City of Paris will approve ,
policies, criteria and guidelines seT_gate from these policies.
gtheirresidential
e-
I off whicch is or will be the manufacture of tangible goods or materials or the
FMaulufactunn
acility
r ds or materials by physical or chemical change. ]Facilities �
p �eurpmog
of manufactured products are also
primarily engaged in assembling component parts
considered manufacturing facilities.
_
RegionalUsed
primarily to receive, store, service, or distribute goods or materials where a majority of
Distribution Facility
the goods or services are distributed to points at least 100 miles from its location in the Taxing
Jurisdictions of Paris and Tamar Coun . __ _
Regional Tourist
Used in providing amusement/entertainment through the admission of the general public where
Entertainment
the majority of users reside at least 100 miles from the Taxing Jurisdictions and where the
Facility
majority of users are likely to stay in the Taxing Jurisdictions for more than one day and will i
therefore likely utilize local restaurants and hotel/motel accommodations,
or develop new tangible
-Reser�chYFaciiity Used
dev iT s sthereto.services
to improvve or the nroductio _pro�_ceso
Other Basic or
l Not elsewhere described, used for the production of products which in the
Service Industry
ealthcare-
creation of new jobs and bring new wealth into the Taxing Jurisdictions (e.g. healthcare-
_
Primary yJabs
related
.d._.industries).
rel .t..e_n—g - - _ _ � _� __ --•— --
crea_i"primary jobs" defined as a job that is available at a company for which
indu—sy_
Creating Industry
a majority of the products or services of that company are ultimately exported to regional,
1 or international markets infusing new dollars into the local economv.. .
statewide nati4na , _�.� .
Base Year Value
J ®-._ —
sed valueof eligible property as of January 1, preceding the date of execution of the "
The asses
agreement plus the agreed upon value of eligible property improvcments made after January
1, but before the execution of the agreement. The Base Year Value may be adjusted. either up
or down fxomyear to year aster renditions by the Lamar County A1praisal District,
_ -
Employer
—.
The owner or lessee of property, who is applying for tax abatement and who will provide jobs
and c�� u�- investment within the Reinvestment Zone or within the Enterprise Zone.
_ � — —_ _ _ — .._.
Zone
Reinvestment Zone
A
An area where the Taxing Jurisdictions have decided to influence development patterns and
the
j is that will contribute to the development of the area through the use of
attract major men
tax abatement for specified improvements. These statues are found in Chapter 312 of the
Texas Tax Code. _
Chapter 2303 of the Texas Government Code. f
Enterl7riso Zone
Aarm of land desip�ated as such under _
.40
,._
Jaobb or Jobs
� A_n "job" is when an individual works hours per week for an employer, and in the position
the individual is provided the benefits normally offered by the employer, such as health
insurance, vacation and some form of retirement benefit. A job is not a position filled for the
employer as a worker or employee of an employment agency or employment service. "Jobs"
also includes "Full-time Ecluivalent Jobs" defined below. _ _
Frdl�ime Equivalent
The iurtsntion of the governing bodies is to provide a company the maximuam flexibility in running
I (FTE) Jobs
their business and making business decisions, especially related to staffing. The following
definition of FTE will be reflected in all incentive agreements. An FTE is:
1. An individual working 40 hours per week in a jab defined above.
2. A number ofPart-time jobs where the hours worked in each such job is less than 40 hours per
8
(Updated 01-10-2022)
POLICY STATEMENT
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR TAX ABATEMENT
week made available by one employer and added together to total 40 hours per week
weFor
example, fourteen (14) pare -time jobs made available by one employer when all such pan -
time jobs added together require a total of 380 hours of work per wcek (but no such part-
time
arttime job requires 40 hours of work or more per week), will equal nine and one-half (9.5)
FTE Jobs (380 hours divided by 40 hours per week equals 9.5).
3. FTE nobs do not require the e�lo�ee to receive benefits from the employer.
, b
Modernization The replacement and upgrading of existing facilities, which increases the productive input or
output, updates thetecbnology, or substantially lowers the unit cost of operation. Modernization
may result from the construction, alteration or installation of buildings, structures, fisted
machinery or equipment, but shall not be for the purpose of reconditioning, refurbishing,
relsai ", or deferred maintenance.
Perso_nal Property 1 Machinery, equipment, tools, shelving or materials eligible under applicable law :For tax
^� abateme_nt, which can be removed from an authorized facility.
I Property` Reai Property or Personal Property defined herein that is el�ble for tax abatement. _
]Real Property _ The land within an Enterprise Zone or a Reinvestment Zone, together with all improvements
and fixtures constructed or otherwise situated thereon.
Tax Abatement The Tax Abatement Advisory Committee will be convened from time to time by the Paris
Advisory Committee Economic Development Corporation to study, review and recommend tax abatements to the
applicable Taxing Jurisdictions in the City of Paris and Lamar County, Texas. The Tax
Abatement Advisory Committee will be composed of one person from each of the Taxing
Jurisdictions: the City of Paris (the City Manager or designee), the County of Lamar (the
County Judge or designee), Paris Junior College (the President or designee), the Chief
Appraiser of the Lamar County Appraisal District, and the Executive Director of the Paris
Economic Development Corporation. Recommendations from the Tax Abatement Advisory
Committee shall be decided by majority vote of the representatives from the three taxing
entities referenced above.µ
(Updated 01-10-2022)
POLICY STATEMENT
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR TAX ABATEMENT
APPENDIX B
Abatement Agreement Terms and Conditions
After approval, the Taxing Jurisdictions shall formally pass an order or resolution and authorize the
execution of an agreement with the owner and/or lessee of the authorized facility, which shall
include, but not be limited to the following terms and conditions:
Project
Description
Contract Terms & Conditions
The fallowing project specifies will be included:
1. The base year value.
2. Percent of increased value to be abated each year.
3. The commencement date and the termination date of abatement.
4. Amount of investment and average number of jobs involved during the term of the
agreement.
5. The proposed use of the authorized facility, nature of construction, time schedule, plat,
property description, and improvement list, as provided in the application.
6. A listing of the kind, number, location, and costs of all proposed improvements of the
property.
7. A statement limiting the uses of the property consistent with the general purpose of
encouraging development or redevelopment of the reinvestment zone during the period that
property tax abatement is in effect.
8. That access to the project is provided to allow for the inspection by Taxing Jurisdictions'
inspectors and officials in order to ensure that the improvements or repairs are made
according to the specifications and conditions of the agreement.
9. That property tax revenue lost as a result of the tax abatement agreement will be recaptured
by the Taxing Jurisdictions if the owner of the property fails to make the improvements or
repairs as provided by the agreement.
10. Each term agreed to by the owner of the property.
11. A requirement that the owner of the property shall certify annually to the Taxing Jurisdictions
that the owner is in compliance with each applicable term of the agreement.
12. Contractual obligations in the event of default, violation of terms or conditions, delinquent
taxes, recapture, administration and assignment, or other provisions that may be required by
state law, or in the discretion of the Taxing Jurisdictions' governing body.
13. That the Taxing Jurisdictions may cancel or modify the agreement if the property owner
_fails to comply with th�reement.
1f the Taxing Jurisdictions datermine that the person or entity receiving an abatement is in default
according to the terms and conditions of its agreement, the Taxing Jurisdictions sball notify the
company or individual in writing at the address stated in the agreement, and if such default is not
cured within a reasonable time specified in such notice ("cure period"), then the agreement may
be modified or terminated without further notice. In the event the company or individual allows
its ad valorem taxes owed to the Taxing Jurisdictions to become delinquent and fails to timely
and properly follow the legal procedures for their protest and/or contest, or violates any of the
terms and conditions of the agreement and fails to cure during the cure period, the agreement
then may be modified or terminated without further notice, and the agreement may provide a
formula for recapture of all or part of the taxes abated. At any time before the expiration, any tax
abatement agreement may be terminated by mutual consent of ell parties involved in the same
_ manner that the a Bement was executed.
Confidentiality Information that is provided to a Taxing Jurisdiction in connection with an application or request
of Proprietary for taoc abatement under these Policies, Criteria and Guidelines, and that describes the specific
Information processes or business activities to be conducted or the equipment or other property to be located
on the property for which tax abatement is sought is confidential and not subject to public
disclosure until the agreement is executed. Such information in the custody of the Taxing
i Jurisdictions after the We mentis executed is not confidential hereunder.
resentatives of the Taxing' 1
e bons_--. Thicement shall stipulate that e l ees or esigna p- _—.�--�_—__--
10
(Updated 01-10-2022)
POLICY STATEMENT
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR TAX ABATEMENT
Jurisdictions will have access to the reinvestment zone during the term of the agreement to inspect
the authorized facility to determine if the terms and conditions of the agreement are being met.
All inspections will be made only after the giving of at least twenty-four (24) hours' prior
notice and will only be conducted in such a manner as to not unreasonably interfere
with the construction and/or operation of the authorized facility. All inspections will be made
with one or more representatives of the company or individual and in accordance with its safety
standards. Upon completion of construction, the Taxing Jurisdictions shall annually evaluate
each authorized facility receiving abatement to ensure compliance with the agreement and report
possible violations of thea eernent to the Taxing Jurisdictions govenung bodies.
Modifications At any time before the expiration of an agreement made under these Policies, Criteria and
of Agreement Guidelines, the agreement may be modified by the parties to the agreement to include other
provisions that could have been included in the original agreement or to delete provisions that
were contained in the original agreement. The modification must be made by the same
procedure by which the original agreement was approved and executed The original agreement,
I however, may not be modified to extend the term of the agreement or the term of the abatement
_ _ ® i Rranted therein bind the time permitted by State law.
Assignment An agreement may be assigned to a new owner or lessee of the authorized facility only with the
prior written consent of the Taxing Jurisdictions. Any assignment shall provide that the assignee
shall irrevocably and unconditionally assume an the duties and obligations of the assignor upon
the same terns and conditions as set out in the agreement, and the Taxing Jurisdictions' approval
shall be subject to the determination of the financial capability of such assignee. Any assignment
of an agreement shall be to an entity that contemplates the same improvements or repairs to the
property, except to the extent such improvements or repairs have been completed. No assignment
shall be approved if the assignor or the assignee is indebted to the Taxing Jurisdictions for ad
valorem taxes or other obligations, or if any event of default under the agreement remains
uncured _
Contract of tax abatement agreements authorized by thelm�Taxingde Jurisdictions
Admrmstration, 1, Each TaxingJurisdiction shall be responsible for the administration, review, and monitoring
tions under these Policies,
Review, Criteria and Guidelines. These responsbilrties y verifying participants in
Monitoring and tax abatement agreements are in full compliance with the terms of the agreement, including
Reporting completion and submission of all required documents in a timely manner.
2. The Paris City Attorney shall expeditiously advise the Taxing Jurisdictions in writing of any
instances of contract non-compliance by tax abatement participants. In addition, the Paris City
Attorney shall, on an annual basis, conduct a perfomtance review of the activities of each tax
abatement participant and report the findings of such review to the leadership and governing
bodies of each taxing entity.
3. The Taxing Jurisdictions' governing bodies shall retain the right to independently review and
audit the activities of tax abatement participants, and shall be responsible for enforcement of
C the terms of any tax abatement agreement authorized hercunder.
4. Annually the Paris City Attorney shall report to each of the governing bodies on its
mowitorirJi and compliance activities and the status of all existing abatement agreements.
11
Annual Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance Year 1--2024
Tax Abatement Agreement ("the Agreement")
Between the City of Paris, Texas
And Lionshead Paris, LLC
Dated June 27, 2022
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
INITIAL WHERE APPROPRIATE:
OR:
Lionshead Paris, LLC (the "Company") hereby certifies that:
(1) All ad valorem taxes have been paid to City and all other taxing entities.
(2) In 2024, the Company maintained no fewer than fifteen (15) full-time
employees to operate the Paris Facility. The total number of full-time
employees working at the Facility as of the date of this report is
(3) The Company has continuously operated the Property and
Improvements described in the Agreement as a tire and wheel
assembly and warehousing plant.
(4) The Company submits herewith and attaches hereto copies of the
Employer Reference summary page of its Texas Workforce
Commission Quarterly Reports for the Paris Facility for each quarter of
2024.
(6) All other terms and conditions of this Agreement have been complied
with.
Lionshead Paris, LLC certifies that the company is not in compliance with its
agreement with City of Paris for the year
Please Circle the number of the item(s) above in which you believe that the Company
has failed to comply and state in what way compliance with the term or terms were
not met. Attach additional pages if necessary..
VERInFICATI,O,N
OF TEXAS
COUNTY 1' LAMAR
BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary, on this day personally appeared
the affiant, a person whose identity is known to me. After I administered
an oath to affiant, affiant testified:
°My name is ,.,,, � _. I am capable of making this verification. I have read
the foregoing Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance. The facts stated in it are within
my personal knowledge and are true and correct, and I further certify that the Employer
Reference Summary pages are true and correct copies of those reports filed with the Texas
Workforce Commission."
Signature of Company Representative
Position/Title
Sworn to and subscribed before me this the day of , 20_.
Notary Public, State of Texas
Annual Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance Year 2--2025
Tax Abatement Agreement ("the Agreement")
Between the City of Paris, Texas
And Lionshead Paris, LLC
Dated June 27, 2022
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
INITIAL WHERE APPROPRIATE:
[7 11;
Lionshead Paris, LLC (the "Company") hereby certifies that:
(1) All ad valorem taxes have been paid to City and all other taxing entities.
(2) In 2025, the Company maintained no fewer than fifteen (15) full-time
employees to operate the Paris Facility. The total number of full-time
employees working at the Facility as of the date of this report is
(3) The Company has continuously operated the Property and
Improvements described in the Agreement as a tire and wheel
assembly and warehousing plant.
(4) The Company submits herewith and attaches hereto copies of the
Employer Reference summary page of its Texas Workforce
Commission Quarterly Reports for the Paris Facility for each quarter of
2025.
(6) All other terms and conditions of this Agreement have been complied
with.
Lionshead Paris, LLC certifies that the company is not in compliance with its
agreement with City of Paris for the year
Please Circle the number of the item(s) above in which you believe that the Company
has failed to comply and state in what way compliance with the term or terms were
not met. Attach additional pages if necessary.
1
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary, on this day personally appeared
the affiant, a person whose identity is known to me. After I administered
an oath to affiant, affiant testified:
"My name is _ ,,, - I am capable of making this verification. I have read
the foregoing Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance. The facts stated in it are within
my personal knowledge and are true and correct, and I further certify that the Employer
Reference Summary pages are true and correct copies of those reports filed with the Texas
Workforce Commission."
Signature of Company Representative
Position/Title
Sworn to and subscribed before me this the _ day of 20®.
Notary Public, State of Texas
Annual Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance Year 3--2026
Tax Abatement Agreement ("the Agreement")
Between the City of Paris, Texas
And Lionshead Paris, LLC
Dated June 27, 2022
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
INITIAL WHERE APPROPRIATE:
OR:
Lionshead Paris, LLC (the "Company') hereby certifies that:
(1) All ad valorem taxes have been paid to City and all other taxing entities.
(2) In 2026, the Company maintained no fewer than fifteen (15) full-time
employees to operate the Paris Facility. The total number of full-time
employees working at the Facility as of the date of this report is
(3) The Company has continuously operated the Property and
Improvements described in the Agreement as a tire and wheel
assembly and warehousing plant.
(4) The Company submits herewith and attaches hereto copies of the
Employer Reference summary page of its Texas Workforce
Commission Quarterly Reports for the Paris Facility for each quarter of
2026.
(6) All other terms and conditions of this Agreement have been complied
with.
Lionshead Paris, LLC certifies that the company is not in compliance with its
agreement with City of Paris for the year
Please Circle the number of the items) above in which you believe that the Company
has failed to comply and state in what way compliance with the term or terms were
not met. Attach additional pages if necessary.
VERIFICATION
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary, on this day personally appeared
, the affiant, a person whose identity is known to me. After I administered
an oath to affiant, affiant testified:
"My name is _ ..�, I am capable of making this verification. I have read
the foregoing Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance. The facts stated in it are within
my personal knowledge and are true and correct, and I further certify that the Employer
Reference Summary pages are true and correct copies of those reports filed with the Texas
Workforce Commission."
Signature of Company Representative
Position/Title
Sworn to and subscribed before me this the ® day of 20—
Notary Public, State of Texas
Annual Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance Year 4--2027
Tax Abatement Agreement ("the Agreement")
Between the City of Paris, Texas
And Lionshead Paris, LLC
Dated June 27, 2022
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
INITIAL WHERE APPROPRIATE:
OR:
Lionshead Paris, LLC (the "Company") hereby certifies that;
(1) All ad valorem taxes have been paid to City and all other taxing entities.
(2) In 2027, the Company maintained no fewer than fifteen (15) full-time
employees to operate the Paris Facility. The total number of full-time
employees working at the Facility as of the date of this report is
(3) The Company has continuously operated the Property and
Improvements described in the Agreement as a tire and wheel
assembly and warehousing plant.
(4) The Company submits herewith and attaches hereto copies of the
Employer Reference summary page of its Texas Workforce
Commission Quarterly Reports for the Paris Facility for each quarter of
2027.
(6) All other terms and conditions of this Agreement have been complied
with.
Lionshead Paris, LLC certifies that the company is not in compliance with its
agreement with City of Paris for the year
Please Circle the number of the item (s) above in which you believe that the Company
has failed to comply and state in what way compliance with the term or terms were
not met. Attach additional pages if necessary
VERIFI ION
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary, on this day personally appeared
the affiant, a person whose identity is known to me. After I administered
an oath to affiant, affiant testified:
"My name is I am capable of making this verification. I have read
the foregoing Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance. The facts stated in it are within
my personal knowledge and are true and correct, and I further certify that the Employer
Reference Summary pages are true and correct copies of those reports filed with the Texas
Workforce Commission."
Signature of Company Representative
Position/Title
Sworn to and subscribed before me this the day of
Notary Public, State of Texas
Annual Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance Year 5--2028
Tax Abatement Agreement ("the Agreement")
Between the City of Paris, Texas
And Lionshead Paris, LLC
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
INITIAL WHERE APPROPRIATE:
OR:
Dated June 27, 2022
Lionshead Paris, LLC (the "Company") hereby certifies that:
(1) All ad valorem taxes have been paid to City and all other taxing entities.
(2) In 2028, the Company maintained no fewer than fifteen (15) full-time
employees to operate the Paris Facility. The total number of full-time
employees working at the Facility as of the date of this report is
(3) The Company has continuously operated the Property and
Improvements described in the Agreement as a tire and wheel
assembly and warehousing plant.
(4) The Company submits herewith and attaches hereto copies of the
Employer Reference summary page of its Texas Workforce
Commission Quarterly Reports for the Paris Facility for each quarter of
2028.
(6) All other terms and conditions of this Agreement have been complied
with.
Lionshead Paris, LLC certifies that the company is not in compliance with its
agreement with City of Paris for the year
Please Circle the number of the item(s) above in which you believe that the Company
has failed to comply and state in what way compliance with the term or terms were
not met. Attach additional pages if necessary,
V,E„R,IFICATION
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary, on this day personally appeared
_'ll, ,_ , the affiant, a person whose identity is known to me. After I administered
an oath to affiant, affiant testified:
"My name is _ I am capable of making this verification. I have read
the foregoing Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance. The facts stated in it are within
my personal knowledge and are true and correct, and I further certify that the Employer
Reference Summary pages are true and correct copies of those reports filed with the Texas
Workforce Commission.”
Signature of Company Representative
Position/Title
Sworn to and subscribed before me this the —day of, __.., 20_,
Notary Public, State of Texas
Annual Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance Year 6--2029
Tax Abatement Agreement ("the Agreement")
Between the City of Paris, Texas
And Lionshead Paris, LLC
Dated June 27, 2022
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
INITIAL WHERE APPROPRIATE:
OR:
Lionshead Paris, LLC (the "Company") hereby certifies that:
(1) All ad valorem taxes have been paid to City and all other taxing entities.
(2) In 2029, the Company maintained no fewer than fifteen (15) full-time
employees to operate the Paris Facility. The total number of full-time
employees working at the Facility as of the date of this report is
(3) The Company has continuously operated the Property and
Improvements described in the Agreement as a tire and wheel
assembly and warehousing plant.
(4) The Company submits herewith and attaches hereto copies of the
Employer Reference summary page of its Texas Workforce
Commission Quarterly Reports for the Paris Facility for each quarter of
2029.
(6) All other terms and conditions of this Agreement have been complied
with.
Lionshead Paris, LLC certifies that the company is not in compliance with its
agreement with City of Paris for the year
Please Circle the number of the item(s) above in which you believe that the Company
has failed to comply and state in what way compliance with the term or terms were
not met. Attach additional pages if necessary.
VERIFICATION
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary, on this day personally appeared
the affiant, a person whose identity is known to me. After 1 administered
an oath to affiant, affiant testified:
"My name is . m. .... .. I am capable of making this verification. I have read
the foregoing Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance. The facts stated in it are within
my personal knowledge and are true and correct, and I further certify that the Employer
Reference Summary pages are true and correct copies of those reports filed with the Texas
Workforce Commission."
Signature of Company Representative
Position/Title
Sworn to and subscribed before me this the ® day of 20_�
Notary Public, State of Texas
Annual Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance Year 7--2030
Tax Abatement Agreement ("the Agreement")
Between the City of Paris, Texas
And Lionshead Paris, LLC
Dated June 27, 2022
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR
INITIAL WHERE APPROPRIATE:
OR:
Lionshead Paris, LLC (the "Company") hereby certifies that:
(1) All ad valorem taxes have been paid to City and all other taxing entities.
(2) In 2030, the Company maintained no fewer than fifteen (15) full-time
employees to operate the Paris Facility. The total number of full-time
employees working at the Facility as of the date of this report is
(3) The Company has continuously operated the Property and
Improvements described in the Agreement as a tire and wheel
assembly and warehousing plant.
(4) The Company submits herewith and attaches hereto copies of the
Employer Reference summary page of its Texas Workforce
Commission Quarterly Reports for the Paris Facility for each quarter of
2030.
(6) All other terms and conditions of this Agreement have been complied
with.
Lionshead Paris, LLC certifies that the company is not in compliance with its
agreement with City of Paris for the year
Please Circle the number of the item (s) above in which you believe that the Company
has failed to comply and state in what way compliance with the term or terms were
not met. Attach additional pages if necessary.
VERI„FICATI,O„N
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary, on this day personally appeared
the affiant, a person whose identity is known to me. After I administered
an oath to affiant, affiant testified:
"My name is _ I am capable of making this verification. I have read
the foregoing Certificate of Compliance/Non-Compliance. The facts stated in it are within
my personal knowledge and are true and correct, and I further certify that the Employer
Reference Summary pages are true and correct copies of those reports filed with the Texas
Workforce Commission."
Signature of Company Representative
Position/Title
Sworn to and subscribed before me this the day of 20—.
Notary Public, State of Texas
Item No. 18
70771"ITIMWI
TO: Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and City Council
Robert G. Vine, Interim City Manager
FROM: Stephanie H. Harris, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Cleanup amendment of Code of Ordinances to reflect current practice regarding
number of Planning and Zoning Commission members
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND: Decades ago, at least as far back as 1970, the City Council created the Planning
and Zoning Commission ("commission") in accordance with Chapter 211 of the Texas Local
Government Code. Chapter 2, Division 2, Sec. 2.03.031 of the Code of Ordinances provided for
the creation of the commission and further provided that the commission would comprise nine (9)
members. Judging by the commission's minutes, sometime between 1999 and 2000 City Council
decided to reduce the number of commissioners to seven (7), presumably to bring the commission
in line with other boards and commissions of the city and to make it easier to fill vacancies;
however, the city failed to amend Sec. 2.03.031 accordingly. The commission has been composed
of seven members since that time.
STATUS OF ISSUE: Attached hereto is a cleanup ordinance to bring Chapter 2, Division 2 into
alignment with what has long been the city's practice. It amends Sec. 2.03.031 to provide for a
seven member commission and amends Sec. 2.03.038 to provide that a quorum for the commission
will be four (4) rather than (5) members to correspond with the seven total members. The
commission discussed the issue at its regular meeting on September 5, 2024, and the consensus
was that the commissioners preferred to leave the commission at seven members.
BUDGET: No impact.
RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 2, Division 2 of the Code
of Ordinances to reduce the number of members of the commission from 9 to 7 and to reduce the
number of members needed for a quorum from 5 to 4.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
AMENDING DIVISION 2, "PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION," OF
CHAPTER 2 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
TO FORMALLY REDUCE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS FROM NINE (9) TO
SEVEN (7) TO CONFORM WITH CURRENT PRACTICE AND ADJUSTING THE
NUMBER OF MEMBERS REQUIRED TO MAKE A QUORUM ACCORDINGLY,
MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT;
PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Chapter 2, Division 2 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Paris
provides for the creation of a Planning and Zoning Commission (the "Commission") has
provided for in Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the City created said Commission, and the Commission has been in
existence for decades; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.03.031 provides that the Commission be composed of nine (9)
members; and
WHEREAS, between 2006 and 2008, City Council reduced the number of
Commissioners from nine (9) to seven (7) to better correspond with other boards and
commissions of the city and to make it easier to fill vacancies on the Commission; and
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2024, the Commission discussed whether to remain at
seven members or to ask the City Council to appoint two (2) additional members, and agreed
to recommend to City Council to leave the composition of the Commission at seven; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the city to amend the
ordinance so that it conforms with current practice;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PARIS, TEXAS:
Section 1. That the findings set out in the preamble to this ordinance are hereby in
all things approved and are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Section 2. That Sections 2.03.031 and 2.03.038 are hereby amended to read as
follows:
"§ 2.03.031. Created; composition.
There is hereby created and established within and for the city a planning and zoning
commission, composed of nine (9) sevens members, whose offices are hereby created."
1
"§ 2.03.038. Quorum.
Five -(3) Fo r ,4 members of the planning and zoning commission shall constitute a
quorum for the transaction of business."
Section 3. That all provisions of the ordinances of the City of Paris, Texas in conflict
with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed, and all other provisions of the
ordinances of the City of Paris, Texas not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance
shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 4. That the repeal of any ordinance or part of ordinances affected by the
enactment of this ordinance shall not be construed as abandoning any action now pending
under or by virtue of such ordinance or as discontinuing, abating, modifying, or altering any
penalty accruing or to accrue, or as affecting any rights of the municipality under any section
or provisions of any ordinance at the time of passage of this ordinance.
Section 5. That it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Paris, Texas,
that this ordinance and every provision hereof, shall be considered severable, and the
invalidity or partial invalidity of any section, clause, or provisions of this ordinance shall not
affect the validity of any other portion of this ordinance.
Section 6. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication as
required by law..
PASSED AND ADOPTED on this 23rd day of September, 2024.
ATTEST:
Janice Ellis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Stephanie H. Harris, City Attorney
2
Mihir Pankaj, Mayor
Item No. 19
Memorandum
TO: Mayor, Mayor Pro -Tem & City Council
Robert Vine, Interim City Manager
FROM: Paul Strahan, Airport Manager/FBO Operator
SUBJECT: Agreement between the City of Paris and LT Wings, LLC for construction of
an access road to accommodate new private hangars at Cox Field Airport
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND: LT Wings, LLC, is proposing the construction of multiple private hangars at
Cox Field Airport. Prior to beginning construction of these hangars, it is a necessity to have an
access road built.
STATUS OF ISSUE: Due to FAA / TXDOT current availability of funding, the airport will not
be able to construct a project like this for years into the future. The proposal made by LT Wings,
LLC. Includes covering the entire cost of this project in order to be able to construct multiple
hangars and the necessary access roads
The agreement before you outlines the construction of an access road to be constructed at Cox
Field Airport, which will be funded by LT Wings, LLC which will be transferred to the City of
Paris upon completion. Once the project is complete and the City accepts it, the City will maintain
the access road.
BUDGET: While this project is not funded by the City, city staff will be utilized to install utility
lines and fire hydrants for this project. It should be noted that this project will generate future
revenue for the airport with ground leases and potential fuel sales.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Interim City Manager to execute an agreement with LT
Wings for construction of an access road, to be funded by LT Wings, LLC.
lf)OAV'1.LO3mAd
SVX3-.l'SilUVd
ioarOMd NO'ddV/3NVliiXV-L
SSBOOV UVc)NVH
INOdUIV 131311-A XOD
N,
11 �,i I � I� a
-t
rhll-l--�11141��'
I........
.
-,
1)f
11 �,i I � I� a
ACCESS ROAD EXTENSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Between the City of Paris, Texas and LT Wings, LLC
This Access Road Extension Development Agreement (the "Agreement") is
entered into by and between the City of Paris, Texas, a Texas Home Rule Municipal
Corporation ("City") and LT Wings, LLC ("Developer") for the extension of an Access
Road at the City's Cox Field airport in Paris, Lamar County, Texas.
WITNESSETH:
I. Effective Date
1.1 This Agreement shall take effect upon the last date of execution hereof.
II. Recitals
2.1 The Recitals set forth herein are a part of the terms of this Agreement for
all purposes.
2.2 The City owns a municipal airport known as Cox Field (the "Airport") located
in Paris, Lamar County, Texas.
2.3 Developer wishes to build multiple hangars at Cox Field. The proposed
hangar locations (See Exhibit A) do not have a vehicle access road to access the
hangars.
2.4 Developer wishes to construct an Access Road (the "Improvements") to
facilitate aircraft access to the proposed hangar at its sole expense, and, once complete,
dedicate said Improvements to the City for future maintenance.
2.5 The City Council of the City of Paris has found that the construction of the
Access Road fulfills a public purpose in that it will support the construction of Developer's
hangars as well as facilitate additional development at the Airport at no cost to the City
except as set forth Paragraph V hereinbelow.
III. Consideration
3.1 Developer: Developer, at Developer's sole cost, will develop and construct
the Improvements to all Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") and Texas Department
of Transportation Aviation Division ("TxDOT") standards and requirements and dedicate
same, upon completion, to City.
3.2 City: City grants Developer the right to develop and construct the
Improvements, and upon completion and all necessary and required inspections to
determine that the Improvements meet all requirements and specifications, will accept
the dedication and thereafter be responsible for maintaining the Improvements.
wit:
IV. Develo er's Obli ations
4.1. Developer will be responsible for the construction of the Improvements to
a. Developer, at its sole cost, will construct the Improvements, which will
consist of an Access Road measuring one thousand three hundred sixty-six
feet (1,366 ft.) in length and twenty-five feet (25 ft.) in width.
b. Developer, at its sole cost, will construct the Improvements, which will
consist of a taxi -lane measuring two hundred ninety-nine feet (299 ft.) in
length and forty feet (40 ft.) in width.
C. Developer will assume responsibility for all costs related to construction of
the Improvements, including but not limited to engineering and geotechnical
services, compaction testing, and construction.
d. Breaking ground on the Improvements is contingent upon approval of all
plans and design by KSA Engineering.
e. Developer will follow all aviation specifications set forth by the FAA and
TxDOT, including but not limited to those set forth in FAA Advisory Circular
150/5300-13B Chapter 4.
f. Developer has retained KSA Engineers, Inc. in connection with the
construction of the Improvements.
g. In addition to state and federal aviation specifications, Developer will abide
by all City ordinances and building codes in constructing the Improvements.
h. Developer will be responsible for grading the edges of the Access Road per
FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13B Chapter 4 including but not limited to
seeding ryegrass for erosion control on the edge of the taxi -lane and access
road extension.
i. Developer will pay for the cost of supplies and materials related to the City's
installation of six (6) fire hydrants and the related water lines to service the
Access Road extension. See Paragraph 5.3.
j. Developer will cause, at its own expense, KSA Engineers, Inc. to update
and submit a revised Airport Layout Plan following the completion of
construction.
k. Developer will be responsible, at its own expense cost, for the removal and
disposal of trees as necessary to construct the Improvements.
I. Developer will be responsible, at its own expense cost, for the removal,
disposal, and installation of a section of airport perimeter fencing to make
room for the access road,
M. Developer will be responsible, at its own expense cost, for the repair of the
haul route road and or taxi -lanes if said road or taxi -lanes are in need of
repair after the completion of the project.
V. Cit 's 049229M
5.1 City shall grant Developer the right to develop and construct the
Improvements, and upon completion and all necessary and required inspections to
determine that the Improvements meet all requirements and specifications, will accept
the dedication and thereafter be responsible for maintaining the Improvements.
5.2
5.3 The City shall install six (6) fire hydrants and water lines to service said
hydrants with the work to be completed by the City's Department of Public Works.
VI. Construction
6.1 Upon execution of this Agreement by both parties (the Effective Date),
Developer will, as soon as is practicable given weather conditions, mobilize and begin
construction of the Improvements and shall complete same by __ , 2024.
VII. Conditions
7.1 The terms and conditions of this Agreement are binding upon and
enforceable against and with respect to the successors and assigns of all parties hereto.
VIII. Insurance and Indemnification
8.2 Insurance.
a. Before commencing work, the Developer, or its construction Contractor and
Subcontractors (for the purposes of this Section 8.2, referred to collectively
as "Developer"), shall, at their own expense, procure, pay for and maintain
during the term of this Agreement the following insurance written by
companies approved by the State of Texas and acceptable to the City of
Paris. The Developer/Contractor/Subcontractors shall furnish to the City
Clerk copies of the insurance policies required herein stating coverages,
limits, expiration dates and compliance with all applicable required
provisions. Certificates shall reference the project/contract number and be
addressed as follows:
City of Paris
150 SE First St
Paris TX 75460
1. Commercial General Liability insurance, including, but not limited to
Premises/Operations, Personal & Advertising Injury, Products/Completed
Operations, Independent Contractors and Contractual Liability, with
minimum combined single limits of $1,000,000 per -occurrence, $1,000,000
Products/Completed Operations Aggregate and $1,000,000 general
aggregate. Coverage must be written on an occurrence form. The General
Aggregate shall apply on a per project basis.
2. Workers' Compensation insurance with statutory limits; and Employers'
Liability coverage with minimum limits for bodily injury: a) by accident,
$100,000 each accident, b) by disease, $100,000 per employee with a per
policy aggregate of $500,000.
3. Business Automobile Liability insurance covering owned, hired and non -
owned vehicles, with a minimum combined bodily injury and property
damage limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence.
NOTE: If the insurance is written on a claims -made form, coverage shall be
continuous (by renewal or extended reporting period) for not less than thirty-
six (36) months following completion of the contract and acceptance by the
City of Paris.
b. With reference to the foregoing required insurance, the Developer shall
endorse applicable insurance policies as follows:
1. A waiver of subrogation in favor of City of Paris, its officials, employees, and
officers shall be contained in the Workers' Compensation insurance policy.
2. The City of Paris, its officials, employees and officers shall be named as
additional insureds on the Commercial General Liability policy, by using
endorsement CG2026 or broader; and, the City of Paris shall be provided a
defense to any and all claims and causes of action arising out of or related
to this Agreement as may be provided pursuant to Developer's general
liability insurance policies. In this regard, Developer shall assist City to
obtain any defense provided by the Developer's general liability insurance
policies.
Nothing contained in Section XII of this Agreement shall be interpreted or
applied as limiting, reducing, or eliminating any obligation or duty that
Developer's insurance carrier may owe to City as an additional insured,
pursuant to endorsement CG2026 or broader under the Developer's
general liability insurance policies required by this Agreement, to provide
the City with a defense and/or indemnify the City for any claim or cause of
action, whether one or more, regardless of the proportionate responsibility
or liability of the Developer or the City. Neither shall anything contained in
this Section VIII be interpreted or applied as providing or otherwise entitling
either Developer, Developer's insurance carrier or any other party any right
or ability to recover over against City any amounts of money attributable to
damages, costs, expenses and/or attorneys' fees based on or arising out of
a finding of comparative or proportionate responsibility or liability as against
the City it being understood and agreed that City in no way intends by this
Agreement to waive its sovereign immunity regarding any claim, suit or
cause of action.
3. All insurance policies shall be endorsed to the effect that City of Paris will
receive at least thirty (30) days' notice in advance of the cancellation
effective date of any policy of insurance that is cancelled by the insurance
company for any reason other than nonpayment of premium.
4. All insurance policies shall be endorsed to the effect that City of Paris will
receive at least ten (10) days' notice in advance of the cancellation effective
date of any policy of insurance that is cancelled by the insurance company
for nonpayment of premium or by Developer for any reason.
C. All insurance shall be purchased from an insurance company that meets a
financial rating of A- or better as assigned by A.M. Best Company or
equivalent.
d. The Developer shall notify City in writing at least thirty (30) days prior to
Developer cancelling or making any material change to any coverage(s)
provided in, or through, the insurance policies required under this Section
8.2. Failure by Developer to provide City the notice required hereunder
may, in the sole discretion of City, be deemed a material breach of this
Agreement.
8.2. Indemnification: The Developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City,
its elected officials, officers and employees harmless from all suits, actions or claims of
any character, name and description brought for or on account of any injuries or damages
received or sustained by any person, persons or property on account of the operations of
the Developer, his agents, contractors, employees, or subcontractors; or on account of
any negligent act or intentional wrongful act or omission of the Developer, his agents,
contractors, employees, or subcontractors in the performance of said contract; or on
account of the failure of the Developer's contractors to provide the necessary barricades,
warning lights or signs; and Developer shall be required to pay any judgment, with cost
including attorneys' fees, which may be obtained against the City growing out of such
injury or damage. The Developer likewise covenants and agrees to, and does hereby,
indemnify and hold harmless the City from and against any and all injuries, loss or
damages to property of the City during the performance of any of the terms and conditions
of this Contract, whether arising out of or in connection with or resulting from, in whole or
in part, any and all alleged acts or omissions of officers, agents, servants, employees,
contractors, subcontractors, licenses or invitees of the City.
IXI. Authority,to Contract
9.1 This Agreement was authorized by resolution of the City Council at its
regularly scheduled meeting on the day of , 2024, authorizing the City
Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.
9.2 This Agreement was entered into by Developer in its corporate capacity,
and the person executing this Agreement on the behalf of Developer has the right and
authority to so contract.
9.3 This Agreement shall constitute a valid and binding Agreement between the
City and Developer when executed in accordance herewith.
9.4 Developer covenants and agrees that Developer is an independent
contractor and not an officer, agent, servant or employee of City; that Developer shall
have exclusive control of and exclusive right to control the details of the work performed
hereunder and all persons performing same, and shall be responsible for the acts and
omissions of his officers, agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors and
consultants; that the doctrine of respondeat superior shall not apply as between City and
Developer, his officers, agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors and consultants,
and nothing herein shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint enterprise
between City and Developer.
X. Le al
10.1 Amendment. No officer, official or agent of the City has the power to amend,
modify or alter this Agreement or waive any of its conditions or to bind the City by making
any promise or representation not contained herein.
10.2 Assignability. This Agreement, except by operation of law, shall not be
assigned or transferred by Developer, without the prior written consent of City, which
consent shall be at the sole discretion of the City.
10.3 Notice. Any written notice required or permitted under the terms of this
Agreement shall be given and be deemed to have been duly served if either (1) delivered
in person, or (2) deposited certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid in the
United States mail, addressed to the designated representative of the respective parties
which are designated as follows:
DEVELOPER:
LT Wings, Inc.
CITY:
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
Attn: City Manager
P.O. Box 9037
Paris, TX 75461-9037
With a "y to:
City Clerk, City of Paris, Texas (address same as above)
10.4 Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement shall be declared
unconstitutional or void by any court of competent jurisdiction, the constitutionality and
validity of the remainder of said Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and to this end
the terms and provisions of this Agreement are declared to be severable.
10.5 Entire Agreement and Governing Law. This Agreement sets forth the entire
understanding between the parties, and any other understandings or agreements shall
be canceled and superseded by this Agreement upon the date of execution hereof. None
of the terms of this Agreement shall be waived, discharged, altered or modified in any
respect, except by an Agreement in writing signed by both parties and specifically
referring to this Agreement. The captions in this Agreement are included for convenience
only and shall not be taken into consideration in any construction or interpretation of this
Agreement or any of its provisions. This Agreement is performable in Lamar County,
Texas, and shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of
the State of Texas. The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to, bind and inure to the
benefit of the City, Developer, and their respective successors, and permitted assigns, if
any.
10.6 Venue. Venue for any actions arising under this Agreement shall lie
exclusively in the courts of Lamar County, Texas.
10.7 Drafting. Developer and the City have both contributed to the drafting of this
Agreement, and no ambiguity, if any, contained in this Agreement shall be construed
against either party.
10.8 Compliance with Laws. Developer agrees to comply with all applicable
federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. If the City notifies
Developer of any violation of such laws, ordinances, rules, or regulations, Developer shall
immediately desist from and correct the violation.
10.9 Non -Discrimination Covenant. Developer, for itself, its personal
representatives, assigns, subcontractors and successors in interest, as part of the
consideration herein, agrees that in the performance of Developer's duties and
obligations hereunder, it shall not discriminate in the treatment or employment of any
individual or group of individuals on any basis prohibited by law. If any claim arises from
an alleged violation of this non-discrimination covenant by Developer, its personal
representatives, assigns, subcontractors or successors in interest, Developer agrees to
assume such liability and to indemnify and defend the City and hold the City harmless
from such claim.
10.10 Governmental Powers. It is understood and agreed that by execution of
this Agreement, the City does not waive or surrender any of its governmental powers.
10.11 Non -Waiver. The failure of the City or Developer to insist upon the
performance of any term or provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right granted
herein shall not constitute a waiver of the City's or Developer's respective right to insist
upon appropriate performance or to assert any such right on any future occasion.
10.12 Force Maieure. The City and Developer shall exercise their best efforts to
meet their respective duties and obligations as set forth in this Agreement, but shall not
be held liable for any delay or omission in performance due to force majeure or other
causes beyond their reasonable control (force majeure), including, but not limited to,
compliance with any government law, ordinance or regulation, acts of God, acts of the
public enemy, fires, strikes, lockouts, natural disasters, wars, riots, material or labor
restrictions by any governmental authority, transportation problems and/or any other
similar causes.
10.13 No Waiver of Governmental IM Muni-
ty. Nothing contained in this Agreement
shall be construed as a waiver of City's governmental immunity, or of any damage caps
or limitations imposed by law, or any other legal protections granted to City by law, except
to the extent expressly provided or necessarily implied herein.
10.14 Mandatory Ownershin Disclosure Provision. Developer, in compliance with
the laws of the State of Texas, will execute and file Form 1295, notice of interested parties,
which can be found on the website of the Texas Ethics Commission at
II m „paj_ _ . fIII mu�..�,s,state a sifiki hii ii um ll7 lll.:'�Ill lEf gpg i � Ili .
10.15 Mandato Anti -Bo colt and Other Provisions. Developer acknowledges
this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is
inaccurate.
i. Pursuant to Section 2271.002 of the Texas Government Code,
Developer certifies that either (i) it meets an exemption criterion under
Section 2271.002; or (ii) it does not boycott Israel and will not boycott
Israel during the term of the Agreement. Developer acknowledges this
Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification
is inaccurate.
ii. Pursuant to SB 13, 87th Texas Legislature, Developer certifies that
either (i) it meets an exemption criterion under SB 13, 87th Texas
Legislature; or (ii) it does not boycott energy companies, as defined in
Section 1 of SB 13, 87th Texas Legislature, and will not boycott energy
companies during the term of the Agreement. Developer acknowledges
this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this
certification is inaccurate.
iii. Pursuant to SB 19, 87th Texas Legislature, Developer certifies that
either (i) it meets an exemption criterion under SB 19, 87th Texas
Legislature; or (ii) it does not discriminate against a firearm entity or
firearm trade association, as defined in Section 1 of SB 19, 87th Texas
Legislature, and will not discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm
trade association during the term of the Agreement. Developer
acknowledges this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld
if this certification is inaccurate.
iv. Pursuant to Subchapter F, Chapter 2252, Texas Government Code,
Developer certifies it is not engaged in business with Iran, Sudan, or a
foreign terrorist organization. Developer acknowledges this Agreement
may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is
inaccurate.
--Signature Page to Follow--
THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
Robert G. Vine, Interim City Manager
LT WINGS, INC.
By._
Title:
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for said County, Texas, on this day
personally appeared Robert G. Vine, Assistant City Manager of the CITY OF PARIS, a
Texas municipal corporation, known to me to be the person who's name is subscribed to
the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he has executed the same on the
City's behalf.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS THE
DAY OF 2024.
Notary Public Lamar County, Texas
My commission expires
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF LAMAR §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of
2024, by of LT Wings, Inc., known to me to be the person
whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and who acknowledges his/her
authority to execute this agreement.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS THE
DAY OF , 2024.
Notary Public, Lamar County, Texas
My commission expires
Item No. 20
TO: Mayor, Mayor Pro -Tem, and City Council
Robert Vine, Interim City Manager
FROM: Gene Anderson, Finance Director
SUBJECT: 2024 ATMOS RATE REVIEW MECHANISM (RRM) SETTLEMENT
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND: Atmos made a rate filing requesting $196.8 million dollars in additional
revenues from its customers system wide. The rate increase request was reviewed by consultants
for the Atmos Cities Steering Committee (ACSC) of which Paris is a member.
STATUS OF ISSUE: The City must act by September 30, 2024. Limitations found in the Rate
Review Mechanism used by Atmos to file for their rate increase reduced the Atmos request to
$182.5 million. Negotiations between Atmos and ACSC resulted in further reducing the request
to $164.7 million. The ordinance before the Council reflects the negotiated rates. This rate
increase will cost the average residential customer $5.52 per month (6.84%). The average
commercial customer will pay $13.39 more each month (3.44%). The effective date of the rate
increase will be October 1, 2024.
BUDGET: This will have minimal impact on the City budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve an ordinance and related attachments granting Atmos
an increase in revenues as recommended by the Atmos Cities Steering Committee.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS,
APPROVING A NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE ATMOS CITIES
STEERING COMMITTEE ("ACSC") AND ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX
DIVISION REGARDING THE COMPANY'S 2024 RATE REVIEW MECHANISM
FILING; DECLARING EXISTING RATES TO BE UNREASONABLE; ADOPTING
TARIFFS THAT REFLECT RATE ADJUSTMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE
NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT; FINDING THE RATES TO BE SET BY THE
ATTACHED SETTLEMENT TARIFFS TO BE JUST AND REASONABLE AND IN
THE PUBLIC INTEREST; APPROVING AN ATTACHMENT ESTABLISHING A
BENCHMARK FOR PENSIONS AND RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS;
REQUIRING THE COMPANY TO REIMBURSE ACSC'S REASONABLE
RATEMAKING EXPENSES; DETERMINING THAT THIS ORDINANCE WAS
PASSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TEXAS
OPEN MEETINGS ACT; ADOPTING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE; AND REQUIRING DELIVERY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO
THE COMPANY AND THE ACSC'S LEGAL COUNSEL.
WHEREAS, the City of Paris, Texas ("City") is a gas utility customer of Atmos Energy
Corp., Mid -Tex Division ("Atmos Mid -Tex" or "Company"), and a regulatory authority with
an interest in the rates, charges, and services of Atmos Mid -Tex; and
WHEREAS, the City is a member of the Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), a
coalition of similarly -situated cities served by Atmos Mid -Tex ("ACSC Cities") that have
joined together to facilitate the review of, and response to, natural gas issues affecting rates
charged in the Atmos Mid -Tex service area; and
WHEREAS, ACSC and the Company worked collaboratively to develop a Rate Review
Mechanism ("RRM") tariff that allows for an expedited rate review process by ACSC Cities as
a substitute to the Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program ("GRIP") process instituted by the
Legislature, and that will establish rates for the ACSC Cities based on the system -wide cost
of serving the Atmos Mid -Tex Division; and
WHEREAS, the current RRM tariff was adopted by the City in a rate ordinance in
2018; and
WHEREAS, on about April 1, 2024 Atmos Mid -Tex filed its 2024 RRM rate request
with ACSC Cities based on a test year ending December 31, 2023; and
WHEREAS, ACSC coordinated its review of the Atmos Mid -Tex 2024 RRM filing
through its Executive Committee, assisted by ACSC's attorneys and consultants, to resolve
issues identified in the Company's RRM filing; and
1
WHEREAS, the Executive Committee, as well as ACSC's counsel and consultants,
recommend that ACSC Cities approve an increase in base rates for Atmos Mid -Tex of $164.7
million on a system -wide basis with an Effective Date of October 1, 2024; and
WHEREAS, ACSC agrees that Atmos plant -in-service is reasonable; and
WHEREAS, with the exception of approved plant -in-service, ACSC is not foreclosed
from future reasonableness evaluation of costs associated with incidents related to gas leaks;
and
WHEREAS, the attached tariffs (Attachment 1) implementing new rates are
consistent with the recommendation of the ACSC Executive Committee, are agreed to by the
Company, and are just, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the settlement agreement sets a new benchmark for pensions and retiree
medical benefits (Attachment 2); and
WHEREAS, the RRM Tariff contemplates reimbursement of ACSC's reasonable
expenses associated with RRM applications.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PARIS, TEXAS:
Section 1. That the findings set forth in this Ordinance are hereby in all things
approved and incorporated herein for all purposes.
Section 2. That, without prejudice to future litigation of any issue identified by ACSC,
the City Council finds that the settled amount of an increase in revenues of $164.7 million on
a system -wide basis represents a comprehensive settlement of gas utility rate issues
affecting the rates, operations, and services offered by Atmos Mid -Tex within the municipal
limits arising from Atmos Mid-Tex's 2024 RRM filing, is in the public interest, and is
consistent with the City's authority under Section 103.001 of the Texas Utilities Code.
Section 3. That despite finding Atmos Mid-Tex's plant -in-service to be reasonable,
ACSC is not foreclosed in future cases from evaluating the reasonableness of costs associated
with incidents involving leaks of natural gas.
Section 4. That the existing rates for natural gas service provided by Atmos Mid -Tex
are unreasonable. The new tariffs attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment
1, are just and reasonable, and are designed to allow Atmos Mid -Tex to recover annually an
additional $164.7 million on a system -wide basis, over the amount allowed under currently
approved rates. Such tariffs are hereby adopted.
Section S. That the ratemaking treatment for pensions and retiree medical benefits
in Atmos Mid-Tex's next RRM filing shall be as set forth on Attachment 2, attached hereto
and incorporated herein.
2
Section 6. That Atmos Mid -Tex shall reimburse the reasonable ratemaking expenses
of ACSC in processing the Company's 2024 RRM filing.
Section 7. That to the extent any resolution or ordinance previously adopted by the
Council is inconsistent with this Ordinance, it is hereby repealed.
Section 8. That the meeting at which this Ordinance was approved was in all things
conducted in strict compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code,
Chapter 551.
Section 9. That if any one or more sections or clauses of this Ordinance is adjudged
to be unconstitutional or invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the
remaining provisions of this Ordinance, and the remaining provisions of the Ordinance shall
be interpreted as if the offending section or clause never existed.
Section 10. That consistent with the City Ordinance that established the RRM
process, this Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage with rates
authorized by attached tariffs to be effective for bills rendered on or after October 1, 2024.
Section 11. That a copy of this Ordinance shall be sent to Atmos Mid -Tex, care of
Chris Felan, Vice President of Rates and Regulatory Affairs Mid -Tex Division, Atmos Energy
Corporation, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1862, Dallas, Texas 75240, and to Thomas Brocato,
General Counsel to ACSC, at Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C., 816 Congress
Avenue, Suite 1900, Austin, Texas 78701.
DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS,
TEXAS, BY A VOTE OF _ TO ON THIS THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024.
ATTEST:.
Janice Ellis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Stephanie H. Harris, City Attorney
Mihir Pankaj, Mayor
3
Attachment 1
MID-TEX DIVISION
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
RATE SCHEDULE: R — RESIDENTIAL SALES
APPLICABLE TO: ALL CUSTOMERS IN THE MID-TEX DIVISION UNDER THE RRM TARIFF
... .... .......... EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on or aft 10/01/2024
.... .....
after
Application
Applicable to Residential Customers for all natural gas provided at one Point of Delivery and measured
through one meter.
Type of Service
Where service of the type desired by Customer is not already available at the Point of Delivery, additional
charges and special contract arrangements between Company and Customer may be required prior to
service being furnished.
Monthly Rate
Customer's monthly bill will be calculated by adding the following Customer and Ccf charges to the
amounts due under the riders listed below:
Charge Amount
Customer Charge per Bill $ 22.95 per month
Rider CEE Surcharge $ 0.05 per month'
Total Customer Charge $ 23.00 per month
Commodity Charge — All Ccf $0.58974 per Ccf
Gas Cost Recovery: Plus an amount for gas costs and upstream transportation costs calculated
in accordance with Part (a) and Part (b), respectively, of Rider GCR.
Weather Normalization Adjustment: Plus or Minus an amount for weather normalization
calculated in accordance with Rider WNA.
Franchise Fee Adjustment: Plus an amount for franchise fees calculated in accordance with Rider
FF. Rider FF is only applicable to customers inside the corporate limits of any incorporated
municipality.
Tax Adjustment: Plus an amount for tax calculated in accordance with Rider TAX.
Surcharges: Plus an amount for surcharges calculated in accordance with the applicable rider(s).
Agreement
An Agreement for Gas Service may be required.
Notice
Service hereunder and the rates for services provided are subject to the orders of regulatory bodies
having jurisdiction and to the Company's Tariff for Gas Service.
'Reference Rider CEE -Conservation and Energy Efficiency as approved in GUD 10170. Surcharge billing effective July 1, 2024.
Attachment 1
MID-TEX DIVISION
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
RATE SCHEDULE: C — COMMERCIAL SALES
APPLICABLE TO: ALL CUSTOMERS IN THE MID-TEX DIVISION UNDER THE RRM TARIFF
....._.. _ .. _ e __
EFF ......,.._.
EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on or after 1 010 1 /2 0 24
Application
Applicable to Commercial Customers for all natural gas provided at one Point of Delivery and measured
through one meter and to Industrial Customers with an average annual usage of less than 30,000 Ccf.
Type of Service
Where service of the type desired by Customer is not already available at the Point of Delivery, additional
charges and special contract arrangements between Company and Customer may be required prior to
service being furnished.
Monthly Rate
Customer's monthly bill will be calculated by adding the following Customer and Ccf charges to the
amounts due under the riders listed below:
Charge Amount
Customer Charge per Bill $ 81.75 per month
Rider CEE Surcharge $ 0.00 per month'
Total Customer Charge $ 81.75 per month
Commodity Charge — All Ccf $ 0.19033 per Cd
Gas Cost Recovery: Plus an amount for gas costs and upstream transportation costs calculated
in accordance with Part (a) and Part (b), respectively, of Rider GCR.
Weather Normalization Adjustment: Plus or Minus an amount for weather normalization
calculated in accordance with Rider WNA.
Franchise Fee Adjustment: Plus an amount for franchise fees calculated in accordance with Rider
FF. Rider FF is only applicable to customers inside the corporate limits of any incorporated
municipality.
Tax Adjustment: Plus an amount for tax calculated in accordance with Rider TAX.
Surcharges: Plus an amount for surcharges calculated in accordance with the applicable rider(s).
Agreement
An Agreement for Gas Service may be required.
Notice
Service hereunder and the rates for services provided are subject to the orders of regulatory bodies
having jurisdiction and to the Company's Tariff for Gas Service.
Presumption of Plant Protection Level
For service under this Rate Schedule, plant protection volumes are presumed to be 10% of normal,
regular, historical usage as reasonably calculated by the Company in its sole discretion. If a customer
believes it needs to be modeled at an alternative plant protection volume, it should contact the company
at iiu
.l___i ...'yl:1d418Pt";II,cM�,Nd,dy;k�'.r wq' �wd.ua',
�� j ti � -;, � � n��:l -��ru.. ..
Reference Rider CEE - Conservation and Energy Efficiency as approved in GUD 10170. Surcharge billing effective July 1, 2024.
Attachment 1
MID-TEX DIVISION
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
RATE SCHEDULE: I — INDUSTRIAL SALES
APPLICABLE TO: ALL CUSTOMERS IN THE MID-TEX DIVISION UNDER THE RRM TARIFF
EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on or after 10101!2024
Application
Applicable to Industrial Customers with a maximum daily usage (MDU) of less than 200 MMBtu per day
for all natural gas provided at one Point of Delivery and measured through one meter. Service for
Industrial Customers with an MDU equal to or greater than 200 MMBtu per day will be provided at
Company's sole option and will require special contract arrangements between Company and Customer.
Type of Service
Where service of the type desired by Customer is not already available at the Point of Delivery, additional
charges and special contract arrangements between Company and Customer may be required prior to
service being furnished.
Monthly Rate
Customer's monthly bill will be calculated by adding the following Customer and MMBtu charges to the
amounts due under the riders listed below:
Charge Amount
Customer Charge per Meter $ 1,587.75 per month
First 0 MMBtu to 1,500 MMBtu $ 0.6553 per MMBtu
Next 3,500 MMBtu $ 0.4799 per MMBtu
All MMBtu over 5,000 MMBtu $ 0.1029 per MMBtu
Gas Cost Recovery: Plus an amount for gas costs and upstream transportation costs calculated
in accordance with Part (a) and Part (b), respectively, of Rider GCR.
Franchise Fee Adjustment: Plus an amount for franchise fees calculated in accordance with Rider
FF. Rider FF is only applicable to customers inside the corporate limits of any incorporated
municipality.
Tax Adjustment: Plus an amount for tax calculated in accordance with Rider TAX.
Surcharges: Plus an amount for surcharges calculated in accordance with the applicable rider(s).
Curtailment Overpull Fee
Upon notification by Company of an event of curtailment or interruption of Customer's deliveries,
Customer will, for each MMBtu delivered in excess of the stated level of curtailment or interruption, pay
Company 200% of the midpoint price for the Katy point listed in Plaits Gas Daily published for the
applicable Gas Day in the table entitled "Daily Price Survey."
Replacement Index
In the event the "midpoint" or "common" price for the Katy point listed in Platts Gas Daily in the table
entitled "Daily Price Survey" is no longer published, Company will calculate the applicable imbalance fees
utilizing a daily price index recognized as authoritative by the natural gas industry and most closely
approximating the applicable index.
Attachment 1
MID-TEX DIVISION
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
R-ASCHEDULE:....... �_----1 I NDUSTRIAL. S AL
...
ES.._ _._
....... TE _
APPLICABLE TO: ALL CUSTOMERS IN THE MID-TEX DIVISION UNDER THE RRM TARIFF
EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on or after 1010112024 ^
Agreement
An Agreement for Gas Service may be required.
Notice
Service hereunder and the rates for services provided are subject to the orders of regulatory bodies
having jurisdiction and to the Company's Tariff for Gas Service.
Special Conditions
In order to receive service under Rate I, Customer must have the type of meter required by Company.
Customer must pay Company all costs associated with the acquisition and installation of the meter.
Presumption of Plant Protection Level
For service under this Rate Schedule, plant protection volumes are presumed to be 10% of normal,
regular, historical usage as reasonably calculated by the Company in its sole discretion. If a customer
believes it needs to be modeled at an alternative plant protection volume, it should contact the company
...... T,. a...... n y .ni,
at��:mw��,� ::�� �'%.����r �u:�:��l�:In�iaa:,�� :Ice���°re�� u7,��:��.0 ����,
Attachment 1
Application
Applicable, in the event that Company has entered into a Transportation Agreement, to a customer
directly connected to the Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division Distribution System (Customer) for the
transportation of all natural gas supplied by Customer or Customer's agent at one Point of Delivery for
use in Customer's facility.
Type of Service
Where service of the type desired by Customer is not already available at the Point of Delivery, additional
charges and special contract arrangements between Company and Customer may be required prior to
service being furnished.
Monthly Rate
Customer's bill will be calculated by adding the following Customer and MMBtu charges to the amounts
and quantities due under the riders listed below:
Charge Amount
Customer Charge per Meter $ 1,587.75 per month
First 0 MMBtu to 1,500 MMBtu $ 0.6553 per MMBtu
Next 3,500 MMBtu $ 0.4799 per MMBtu
All MMBtu over 5,000 MMBtu $ 0.1029 per MMBtu
Upstream Transportation Cost Recovery: Plus an amount for upstream transportation costs in
accordance with Part (b) of Rider GCR.
Retention Adjustment: Plus a quantity of gas as calculated in accordance with Rider RA.
Franchise Fee Adjustment: Plus an amount for franchise fees calculated in accordance with Rider
FF. Rider FF is only applicable to customers inside the corporate limits of any incorporated
municipality.
Tax Adjustment: Plus an amount for tax calculated in accordance with Rider TAX.
Surcharges: Plus an amount for surcharges calculated in accordance with the applicable rider(s).
Imbalance Fees
All fees charged to Customer under this Rate Schedule will be charged based on the quantities
determined under the applicable Transportation Agreement and quantities will not be aggregated for any
Customer with multiple Transportation Agreements for the purposes of such fees.
Monthly Imbalance Fees
Customer shall pay Company the greater of (i) $0.10 per MMBtu, or (ii) 150% of the difference per MMBtu
between the highest and lowest "midpoint" price for the Katy point listed in Platts Gas Daily in the table
entitled "Daily Price Survey" during such month, for the MMBtu of Customer's monthly Cumulative
Imbalance, as defined in the applicable Transportation Agreement, at the end of each month that exceeds
10% of Customer's receipt quantities for the month.
Attachment 1
MID-TEX DIVISION
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
RATE SCHEDULE: T — TRANSPORTATION
APPLICABLE TO: ALL CUSTOMERS IN THE MID-TEX DIVISION UNDER THE RRM TARIFF
E ....__.._..._ _ __
EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on
_ ..... ......
or afterml0/0112024
Curtailment Overpull Fee
Upon notification by Company of an event of curtailment or interruption of Customer's deliveries,
Customer will, for each MMBtu delivered in excess of the stated level of curtailment or interruption, pay
Company 200% of the midpoint price for the Katy point listed in Platts Gas Daily published for the
applicable Gas Day in the table entitled "Daily Price Survey."
Replacement Index
In the event the "midpoint" or "common" price for the Katy point listed in Platts Gas Daily in the table
entitled "Daily Price Survey' is no longer published, Company will calculate the applicable imbalance fees
utilizing a daily price index recognized as authoritative by the natural gas industry and most closely
approximating the applicable index.
Agreement
A transportation agreement is required.
Notice
Service hereunder and the rates for services provided are subject to the orders of regulatory bodies
having jurisdiction and to the Company's Tariff for Gas Service.
Special Conditions
In order to receive service under Rate T, customer must have the type of meter required by Company.
Customer must pay Company all costs associated with the acquisition and installation of the meter.
Attachment 1
Provisions for Adiustment
The Commodity Charge per Ccf (100 cubic feet) for gas service set forth in any Rate Schedules utilized
by the cities of the Mid -Tex Division service area for determining normalized winter period revenues shall
be adjusted by an amount hereinafter described, which amount is referred to as the "Weather
Normalization Adjustment." The Weather Normalization Adjustment shall apply to all temperature
sensitive residential and commercial bills based on meters read during the revenue months of November
through April. The five regional weather stations are Abilene, Austin, Dallas, Waco, and Wichita Falls.
Com utation of Weather Normalization Adjustment,
The Weather Normalization Adjustment Factor shall be computed to the nearest one-hundredth cent
per Ccf by the following formula:
The Weather Normalization Adjustment for the jth customer in ith rate schedule is computed as:
WNA; = WNAFi x q;j
Where qr is the relevant sales quantity for the jth customer in ith rate schedule.
(HSFi x (NDD-ADD) )
WNAFi =
Ri
(BLi + (HSFi x ADD) )
Where
i =
any particular Rate Schedule or billing classification within any such
particular Rate Schedule that contains more than one billing classification
WNAFi =
Weather Normalization Adjustment Factor for the ith rate schedule or
classification expressed in cents per Ccf
Ri =
Commodity Charge rate of temperature sensitive sales for the ith schedule or
classification.
HSFi =
heat sensitive factor for the ith schedule or classification divided by the
average bill count in that class
NDD =
billing cycle normal heating degree days calculated as the simple ten-year
average of actual heating degree days.
ADD =
billing cycle actual heating degree days.
Bli =
base load sales for the ith schedule or classification divided by the average
bill count in that class
The Weather Normalization Adjustment for the jth customer in ith rate schedule is computed as:
WNA; = WNAFi x q;j
Where qr is the relevant sales quantity for the jth customer in ith rate schedule.
Attachment 1
Base Use/Heat Use Factors
Weather Normalization A..diustment iWNAI Report
On or before June 1 of each year, the company posts on its website at atmosenergy.com/mtx-wna, in
Excel format, a Weather Normalization Adjustment (WNA) Report to show how the company calculated
its WNAs factor during the preceding winter season. Additionally, on or before June 1 of each year, the
company files one hard copy and an Excel version of the WNA Report with the Railroad Commission of
Texas' Gas Services Division, addressed to the Director of that Division.
Residential
Commercial
Base use
Heat use
Base use
Heat use
Weather Station
Ccf
Ccf/HDD
Ccf
Ccf/HDD
Abilene
9.52
0.1526
88.98
0.7485
Austin
8.87
0.1343
213.30
0.9142
Dallas
12.38
0.2024
185.59
1.0974
Waco
8.71
0.1219
130.62
0.7190
Wichita
10.20
0.1394
117.78
0.6435
Falls
Weather Normalization A..diustment iWNAI Report
On or before June 1 of each year, the company posts on its website at atmosenergy.com/mtx-wna, in
Excel format, a Weather Normalization Adjustment (WNA) Report to show how the company calculated
its WNAs factor during the preceding winter season. Additionally, on or before June 1 of each year, the
company files one hard copy and an Excel version of the WNA Report with the Railroad Commission of
Texas' Gas Services Division, addressed to the Director of that Division.
Line
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Attachment 2
ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION
MID-TEX RATE REVIEW MECHANISM
PENSIONS AND RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS FOR CITIES APPROVAL
TEST YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2023
Pension Employment Pension Employment Executive Benefit Adjustment
count PlanBenefit Plan Account Plan Benefit Plan Plan Total
(b) www_ (c) (d) ........ (e) (f) (9)
Proposed Benefits Benchmark -
Fiscal Year 2024 Willis Towers Watson Report as adjusted
$ 1,402,365 $
(1,146,665) $
2,186,549 $
(4,070,086) $
278,107
Allocation Factor
_j5.93%
45.93%
82.00%
82.00%
100.00%
Proposed Benefits Benchmark Costs Allocated to Mid -Tex (Ln 1 x Ln 2)
$ 644,172 $
(526,717) $
1,792,929 $
(3,337,394) $
278,107
Capital and
100.00%
ProMosed Benefits Benchmark Costs to A rave (Ln 3 x Ln 4)
P Approve
$ 644,10072 $
r526�07107) 8
1,792,929 $
(3,337 3941 $
278,107 $ (1,148 903
u.
O&M Expense Factor (WP_F-2.3, Ln 2)
Summary of Costs to Approve:
Total Pension Account Plan
Total Post -Employment Benefit Plan
Total Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan
Total (Ln 10 + Ln 11 + Ln 12)
81.70% 81.70% 38.85% 38.85% 11.24%
$ 526,315 $ 696,536 $ 1,222,851
$ (430,349) $ (1,296,547) (1,726,896)
$ m..., 31..256 .... 31.,256 m.
$ 526 315 $..._.............. 696,5316
--' 1 $ 31,256 $ i472,789�
.,, (430,349' $ $ .1,296,547,
Item No. 21
Memorandum
TO: Mayor, Mayor Pro -Tem & City Council
Robert Vine, Interim City Manager
FROM: Janice Ellis, City Clerk
SUBJECT: CHANGES FOR MEETING DATES IN NOVEMBER & DECEMBER
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND: Normally in November and December, the second City Council meetings of
the month are cancelled, due to the holidays and accompanying conflicts in scheduling.
STATUS OF ISSUE: According to the regular meeting schedule, City Council meetings are
scheduled for November 11 (Veterans Day), November 25 (the week of Thanksgiving), December
9, and December 23 (the week of Christmas).
Option 1: Cancel November 11, November 25 and December 23 meetings.
Option 2: Cancel the November 11 & 25 meetings and reschedule into one meeting for Tuesday,
November 12; and cancel the December 23 meeting. This would result in one meeting for
November and one meeting for December
BUDGET: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 2.
Memorandum
Item No: 22
TO: Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and City Council
Interim City Manager, Rob Vine
FROM: Osei Amo-Mensah, Director of Planning & Community Development
Liaison to TIRZ Board
SUBJECT: Consider and approve expenditure of $20,000.00 from the TIRZ No. 1 fund
for the retention of a consultant to assist the Board with strategies for
reviewing and possibly amending the Project and Financing Plans for TIRZ
No. 1, and possibly take action.
DATE: September 23, 2024
BACKGROUND: During the special meeting of the TIRZ Board on Thursday, March 28, 2024,
the members agreed that a consultant should be hired to assist the board with strategies for
reviewing and possibly amending the project and financing plans for TIRZ No. (1). On Thursday,
June 13, 2024, at the TIRZ Board Meeting, a sub -committee for the TIRZ board was created to
review and select a consultant to assist the board with strategies for reviewing and possibly
amending the Project and Financing Plans for TIRZ No. 1. The Sub -committee of the TIRZ Board
convened on Thursday, August 29, 2024, as it was tasked to find a consultant to assist the board
with strategies for reviewing and possibly amending the Project and Financing Plans for TIRZ
(No. 1.) and selected Forked Pine Consulting.
The TIRZ Board Sub -committee deliberated on two finalist consultants:
1. Forked Pine Consulting.
2. Jeff Snowden - Capex Consulting Group.
Copies of the proposal document by each consultant were emailed to the TIRZ Board members on
Friday, August 23, 2024, per the request of Chairman Cody Head during the August 8, 2024,
meeting.
STATUS OF ISSUE:
On Thursday, September 12, 2024, the TRIZ Board met at its regular meeting to discuss the above
item and unanimously voted to accept the selected consultant (Forked Pine Consulting with a
consulting service fee cap at $20,000.00) based on the TIRZ Board Sub -committee's
recommendation. While the law vests authority in the TIRZ board to make decisions such as
choosing and retaining consultants, state law and the TIRZ No. 1 Bylaws require that City Council
approve all expenditures from the TIRZ fund.
BUDGET: The consultant's proposal for the consulting service cap is at $20,000.00 and will be
paid from the TIRZ fund. Consequently, there is no impact to the City's budget.
OPTIONS:
1. The City Council may vote to accept the TIRZ Board's expenditure for hiring Forked Pine
Consulting.
2. The City Council may reject the TIRZ Board's expenditure for hiring Forked Pine
Consulting and request for another Proposal.
RECOMMENDATION:
The TIRZ Bylaws Article 1, Section 2.
".... The City Council must approve all programs and expenditures for the Zone and annually
review any financial statements of the Zone."
The TIRZ Board recommends that the City Council should approve the consulting service fee cap
of $20,000.00 for Forked Pine Consulting.
Paris TIRZ Review
and Education
Proposal
Statement of Work
Executive Summary: Using a combination of in-person and
teleconference meetings, along with written summaries and
other documentation, we would educate stakeholders in Paris
about the basics and best practices of oversight, planning, and
finances of their TIRZ. We would also provide a comprehensive
review of the financial performance of the existing TIRZ #1,
comparing projected to actual revenue, a discussion of the
allowed uses of TIRZ funds under the current regulations, and
detailed documentation about how to stay compliant, how to
modify the existing TIRZ, create a new TIRZ, and tools to model
various scenarios for the TIRZ. We would also provide initial
guidance in the form of checklists and implementation guidelines
to help the Paris TIRZ Board and City Council if they choose to
modify or create a TIRZ.
I::::1roce Overview".
Review IRh s ...... Il: xu.st.in g 1::::1aHs TllRZ #1C.
Forked Pine will review the existing Paris TIRZ #1, including the
specific items below:
• TIRZ Financial Performance
o Verify tax base assumptions and inputs
o Calculate increment growth
o Compare actual growth to projected growth
o Provide root cause analysis to determine sources
of difference, if any, between projected growth
and actual growth
• Compliance Review
o Review and reporting of all submitted documents
required by Texas Code 39§311 "Tax Increment
Financing Act"
o If any documents are missing, list the missing documents and provide information on how to
complete and submit
Ongoing TIRZ administration documents
o Checklists for annual reporting requirements
o Flowcharts and timelines for any required reporting, and sample internal reporting documents
o An updated spreadsheet to track anticipated TIRZ revenue by parcel
An easy to update model of the Paris TIRZ #1 to be used by the Board and staff for projecting
future impacts and to determine costs for potential economic development incentives offers
Phase 2 — Education and Outreach
In-person meetings — We propose 2 visits to Paris/Lamar County to hold in-person education
sessions. The first visit could involve meetings with City and EDC staff for education on TIRZ basics,
as well as meetings with existing and newly appointed Paris TIRZ #1 Board of Directors, ensuring a
complete and consistent understanding of how a TIRZ works, the duties and responsibilities are for
Board members. Other topics would include potential additional participating taxing jurisdictions and
eligible uses of TIRZ funds. The second visit, at the discretion of the Board, anticipates public
education sessions to provide information to interested parties and the public as well as follow ups
with Board and staff to answer specific questions or to explore specific areas of TIRZ administration in
more detail.
Virtual meetings - We are also available for additional telephone calls and/or teleconference
meetings during the term of our agreement to provide extra opportunities for education and
explanations. While we recognize that remote learning isn't as effective as in-person, we also
understand scheduling may be challenging for some and we would offer this option to increase
availability to anyone interested in TIRZ.
Deliverables - Include all the documentation created in Phase 1, including any presentations,
spreadsheets, FAQ/Q&As, checklists and flow charts depicting the process, and the resource manual
as described previously.
o We will also provide a resource manual with the enabling legislation, sample resolution
Language, form contracts, application documents, administrative procedures, and program
guidelines to ensure the ability to proceed in establishing or modifying a TIRZ, should the
Board choose to.
Co rir"Ir Igoe Imes ho ii
For providing the above outlined services and written documentation, we propose the following:
...._ProfessionalServices Fe.....� ��.. ...�
e $20,000
Travel- maximum amount for contract ......0
$5 000
-Additional Professional Services: Joe Denney $20
y 0/hour
Additional Professional Services — Cheryl Denney $50
._...�.... v.. 0/hour
Travel would be reimbursed and would be limited to Economy Plus on United Airlines or Business Select
on Southwest Airlines, large sedan or equivalent rental car, and a 3 star or equivalent hotel. Any
upgrades or costs more than the allowable under Texas law or the policies of the City of Paris
will be borne by Forked Pine. Additional services would be by written addendum to the executed
agreement, signed by both parties in advance of additional services being provided.
The specific deliverables are listed below:
Final Excel spreadsheet detailing findings of comparative review of the TIRZ from inception to 7/1/2024.
Root Cause Analysis of any differences between the projections and the actual performance of the TIRZ.
Compliance review summary showing all the required documentation submitted compared to statutory a
regulatory reporting requirements and detailing any discrepancies.
Reporting and Administration Plan
This would include checklists and timelines for submission of reporting along with sample docume
An Excel spreadsheet designed specifically for Paris TIRZ #i to allow staff to model anticipated TI
cashflows
iii. An Excel spreadsheet designed for economic development professionals and staff to model the co
and potential impacts to the TIRZ for any proposed future TIRZ transactions.
Copies of electronic presentations developed for the Paris TIRZ Board, completely editable and with
copyright belonging to the Paris TIRZ Board.
Additional Professional Services — we provided these prices in the event the Board chooses to engage us
activities beyond the scope of this engagement. For the services described in the proposal and further
clarified above, we are capping our fee at $20,00o. These hourly values are only in the event there is inte
in utilizing our services outside of the scope of this proposal.
Examples of additional services we've been asked to provide in previous engagements: drafting regulator,
municipal code language for the Board or Council, economic modeling of non-TIRZ incentives, significant
media, or public relations activities, planning for additional TIRZ or amending the existing TIRZ, and activit
related to remediating any missing reporting documents. Since we have no information currently regarding
any need or use case for the additional hourly rate, we are unable to provide a cap for those rates. We wo
provide an estimate of time and cost in the event the Board would like to expand the scope of the
engagement prior to commencing the new work and would get approval before beginning.