845 SE 39th St. - Variance denied for accessory structure101111" E X �1!k S11"11111
z 19
1AMere E 1�2 �d H " lz er
DECISION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
RE: 845 SE 39hSt- Variance Requests
Theodore Henderson
845 SE 39th St
Paris, TX 75460
ACTION REQUESTED:
1) 3' variance to allow a detached accessory structure to be located 5' from the rear property line
and 0' from the easement line, Section 13-101(c).
2) 11' variance to allow a detached accessory structure to be located 4' from main structure,
Section 13-101(c).
The above -referenced requests were denied by the City of Paris Zoning Board of Adjustment
("") _t:)V, abstaining.
Boardon 1/7/2025 by a vote of 51 _ 11 ayes, _ nays and —0
On this date, the Board found that the requests did not meet the conditions set forth in the City of
Paris Accessory Building Regulations Ordinance, Sections 13-101(c).
Appeal: Any interested person wishing to appeal this Board decision is required to file a petition
for Writ of Certiorari in a district court, county court or county court at law within ten (1 0) days
of the date this decision is filed in the Board's office consistent with section 211.011 of the Texas
Local Government Code.
The Board of Adi ustment hereby denies the variance requests based upon the following findings.
STAFF RECOMMENDED FINDINGS
1. The accessory structure setbacks cannot be met.
2. The lot is platted.
3. The request for variances is not in harmony with the general purposes and intent of area
regulations for accessory buildings in residential and apartment districts contained in the
Zoning Ordinance 1710 Subsection 13-101. (c) and will not protect the character of the
immediate vicinity of the area.
4. There are no special or unique condition(s) of restricted area, shape, topography, or
physical. features that exist on the subject parcel of land that cause unusual and practical
difficulty or unnecessary hardship in compliance with the provisions sought here to be
317 . . . ....... ..
37'77�
g
7
77 ,, 7 7
MR,
. . .. .. .. . . .... .
rr
. . . .. . .......
. . . . . ... . .
. .. ..............
iii
71" E X A S
�od u], Texaiuc React"i j�� 1,1111� g"I'l i", III
k'W
varied.
5. The hardship sought to be avoided is the result of (a) the applicant's own actions (self-
imposed or self-created), and no (b) economic or financial "hardship."
6. The provision of the ordinance regulation that are sought to be varied, does not deprive the
applicant of reasonable rights to use the property that are commonly enjoyed by other
residential. properties in the SF -2 Residential Zoning District which are required to comply
with these same ordinance provisions.
This dec",1`6"i'll was filed the Board's office on 1/7/2025.
..........
Chairperson, Board of Adjustment
...... ........
Secretary to the Board
........... .
. . ....... .
.... ....... ..........