2006-075-RES-LAMAR CO. WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-075
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS,
PARIS, TEXAS, TERMINATING THE EXISTING WATER PURCHASE
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARIS AND LAMAR COUNTY
WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT; APPROVING, ACCEPTING, AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A NEW WHOLESALE
TREA TED WATER CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARIS AND
THE LAMAR COUNTY WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT; MAKING OTHER
FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Paris has been since July 17, 1967, furnishing water to Lamar
County Water Supply District (LCWSD) under the terms of a Water Purchase Contract; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris did heretofore, on the 15th day of April,
1985, in Resolution No. 85-028 approved a Water Purchase Contract between the City of Paris
and Lamar County Water Supply District which modified and amended the July 17, 1967
contract; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris, did heretofore authorize the
negotiation of a cost of service Water Purchase Contract between the City of Paris and Lamar
County Water Supply District; and,
WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interest of the citizens of Paris that said
existing Water Purchase Contract be terminated and declared null and void, and a new Wholesale
Treated Water Contract in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, be in
all things approved; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF P ARIS, PARIS,
TEXAS:
Section 1. That the findings set out in the preamble to this resolution are hereby in all
things approved.
Section 2. That the existing Water Purchase Contract between the City of Paris and
Lamar County Water Supply District dated July 17, 1967 and modified in April of 1985, be and
the same is hereby terminated and declared null and void.
Section 3. That the new Wholesale Treated Water Contract with the Lamar County
Water Supply District for water service and establishing the consideration for the same
prescribed in Exhibit A attached hereto, be, and the same is hereby approved and accepted.
Section 4. That the Mayor of the City of Paris be, and he is hereby authorized and
directed on behalf of the City of Paris to execute the new Wholesale Treated Water Contract
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 5. That this resolution shall be effective from and after its date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 8th day of May, 2006.
ATTEST:
'-" . ("
"
\ /;
,I\J:~N-k
Curtis Fendley, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~ ;JJ. A;O-Q-h
D. Lestock, Assistant City Attorney
WHOLESALE TREATED WATER CONTRACT
THE STATE OF TEXAS S
S
COUNTY OF LAMAR ~
This Wholesale Treated Water Contract ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and
between the City of Paris ("Paris"), a municipal corporation, and Lamar County Water Supply
District ("LCWSD"), a Conservation and Reclamation District and political subdivision of the
state of Texas, for the sale and purchase of Treated Water. This Agreement sets out the terms
and conditions under which Paris will deliver Treated Water to LCWSD on a wholesale basis,
and LCWSD will pay Paris for providing it with such Treated Water.
RECIT ALS
WHEREAS, Paris owns and operates a water supply and treatment system capable of
providing to LCWSD, based on its current water usage pattern, 395,820 gallons per hour (gph) of
Treated Water, produced at the city's Water Treatment Plant during Phase 1 of this Agreement;
and
WHEREAS, following the construction of improvements to its system necessary to
commence Phase 2 of this Agreement, Paris would be capable of providing to LCWSD, based on
its current water usage pattern, 499,980 gph of Treated Water, produced at the City's Water
Treatment Plant; and
WHEREAS, LCWSD owns and operates a distribution system and furnishes water
service to customers both within and outside of its boundaries and certificated service area; and
WHEREAS, LCWSD previously contracted with Paris for a wholesale supply of water,
pursuant to a water purchase contract executed on July 17, 1967 and subsequently amended and
modified on December 13,1977, April 1, 1985, and March 14, 1988 (the "1967 Water Purchase
Contract"); and
WHEREAS, LCWSD needs to increase its supply of Treated Water in excess of the
quantity specified in the 1967 Water Purchase Contract in order to meet its present and future
needs; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to tenninate the 1967 Water Purchase Contract, and
replace that contract with this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interests of both Paris and LCWSD that said
Parties enter into a mutually satisfactory agreement by means of which LCWSD may obtain
from Paris a larger supply of Treated Water; and
EXHIBIT A.
Paris/LCWSD Who\csale Treated Water Contract
WHEREAS, the lnterlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government
Code, authorizes Paris and LCWSD to enter into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Paris and LCWSD concur that the teIms, conditions and considerations
stated herein are fair, just and reasonable and will mutually benefit the Parties and serve the
public interest; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promIses, covenants and
considerations set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS
The following terms shall have the meanings set out below:
1.1. "Agreement" means this Wholesale Treated Water Contract and any subsequent
amendments agreed to in writing by the Parties.
1.2. "Approvals" means any and all pennits, appropnatlOns, clearances, licenses,
authorizations, consents, decrees, waivers, privileges, filings, exemptions, easements or
approvals of any Person or any federal, state, city, county, local, or regional authorities,
departments, bodies, commissions, corporations, branches, agencies, courts, tribunals,
judicial authorities, legislative bodies, administrative bodies or regulatory bodies.
1.3. "Capacity Charge" means the fixed annual payment amount to be paid in twelve equal
installments for each year, calculated based on the Phase I Maximum Hour Capacity
Demand as a percentage of the Initial Rated Plant Capacity of the Water Treatment Plant,
as shown in Exhibit 1, plus corresponding adjustments for the commencement of Phase 2.
1.4. "Cost of Service Study" means that study performed annually pursuant to Article 3.2 of
this Agreement.
1.5. "Day" means that period of time beginning at 12:00 midnight and continuing through
11:59 PM.
1.6. "Demand Charge" means the fixed annual payment amount to be paid in twelve equal
installments for each year, calculated based on the Demand Rate applied to the Maximum
Day Metered Demand. A separate demand charge will be calculated for Treated Water
delivered through the Water Distribution System, for water delivered through the FM 79
Point of Delivery and for Treated Water produced by the City for LCWSD from the
Water Treatment Plant. For Treated Water delivered through the Water Distribution
System the Demand Charge assessed will consist of the Demand Charge for Treated
Water delivered through the Water Distribution System plus the Demand Charge for
Treated Water produced by the City for LCWSD from the Water Treatment Plant. For
Treated Water not delivered through the Water Distribution System, only the demand
charge for Treated Water produced by the City for LCWSD from the Water Treatment
Plant will be assessed. For Treated Water delivered to the FM 79 Point of Delivery, the
2 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contraet
Demand Charge will include a pro-rated portion of the Distribution System Demand
Charge plus the Demand Charge for Treated Water produced by the City for LCWSD
from the Water Treatment Plant.
1. 7. "Demand Rate" means the dollar amount per million gallons per day (mgd) applied to
LCWSD's Maximum Day Metered Demand to calculate the Demand Charge. A separate
Demand Rate will be developed in the Cost of Service Study for Treated Water delivered
through the Water Distribution System, for Treated Water delivered through the FM 79
Point of Delivery and for Treated Water produced by the City for LCWSD from the
Water Treatment Plant.
1.8. "Distribution Maximum Day Metered Demand" means the measured daily maximum
usage at Points of Delivery on the Water Distribution System as determined through
Meter readings.
1.9. "Effective Date" means the date that this Agreement has been signed by both Parties.
1.10. "Excess Demand Charge" means the charge assessed against LCWSD for exceeding the
Maximum Hour Capacity Demand as provided in Article 2.4 of this Agreement during
the Rate Year.
1.11. "Fiscal Year" means the City of Paris' fiscal year, which currently is the period from
October 1 until September 30 of the following calendar year.
1.12. "Individual Maximum Diversion Rate" means the highest rate of flow of Treated
Water Paris agrees to deliver to LCWSD at each individual Point of Delivery expressed
in gallons per hour, as identified in Articles 2.3 and 4.4 of this Agreement.
1.13. "Initial Rates" means the rates set for the period beginning on the effective date of this
Agreement and in effect until rates are set following the execution of the first Cost of
Service Study under this Agreement.
1.14. "Initial Rated Plant Capacity" means the maximum hourly production capacity of the
Water Treatment Plant of 1,333,333 gallons per hour on the Effective Date as determined
on the basis of applicable state criteria.
1.15. "Maximum Hour Capacity Demand" means the maximum hourly Treated Water to be
produced for LCWSD by the Water Treatment Plant as provided in Article 2.4 of this
Agreement.
1.16. "Maximum Day Metered Demand" means the measured daily maximum usage as
detennined through Meter readings, adjusted for lost and unaccounted for water as
provided in Article 2.3 of this Agreement.
3 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Waler Contract
1.17. "Meter(s)" means the metering facility or devices installed or to be installed at the Points
of Delivery to measure the amount of Treated Water delivered to LCWSD by Paris as
provided in this Agreement.
1.18. "Month" means a calendar month.
1.19. "Operations Fee" means an additional 1 0% of the cost of service as provided in Exhibit
1, which represents a general fee charged by Paris for providing wholesale Treated Water
service to LCWSD.
1.20. "Party" means either Paris or LCWSD, and "Parties" means Paris and LCWSD
collectively.
1.21. "Phase 1" means the period commencing on the Effective Date and continuing until the
commencement of Phase 2.
1.22. "Phase 2" means the period commencing the sooner of (1) three years following written
notice from LCWSD to Paris requesting expansion of Paris' water supply and treatment
system sufficient to allow the City to provide LCWSD 8,333 gpm or 499,980 gph of
Treated Water measured at the City's Water Treatment Plant or (2) completion of such
expansion, and continuing for the tenn of this Agreement.
1.23. "Points of Delivery" means the locations where Paris will provide Treated Water to
LCWSD as identified in Article 2.3 of this Agreement.
1.24. "Rate Year" means each twelve-month period beginning June 1 and ending May 31 of
the following calendar year in which rates determined in the most recent Cost of Service
study will be in effect.
1.25. "Rated Plant Capacity" means the maximum hourly production capacity of the Water
Treatment Plant as determined based on applicable state criteria.
1.26. "Regulatory Requirements" means all applicable requirements and provisions of
federal, state, and county constitutions, laws, statutes, rules, regulations and ordinances
enacted or issued from time to time, including, without limitation, all applicable sections
of the Texas Water Code and the rules and regulations of the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, and the Texas Administrative Code, and all judicial and
administrative orders, judgments, and decrees of any governmental authority having
jurisdiction concerning the matters contained herein issued from time to time.
1.27. "Return Flow" means Treated Water supplied to LCWSD by Paris that is beneficially
used but not consumed and that is subsequently returned to any watercourse.
1.28. "TCEQ" means the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and its successor
agencIes.
4 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
1.29. "Test Year" means the twelve-month period ending September 30 of the prior calendar
year that will serve as the basis for the Cost of Service Study.
1.30. "Total Maximum Diversion Rate" means the highest rate of flow of Treated Water
Paris agrees to produce for LCWSD at the Water Treatment Plant expressed in gallons
per hour, as identified in Articles 2.2, 2.3 and 4.4 of this Agreement.
1.31. "Treated Water" means water treated to the level required by the standards of the
TCEQ or other state agency of appropriate jurisdiction. Provided however, LCWSD may
request that Paris modify the operation of its treatment system to assist LCWSD in
meeting TCEQ regulations, including disinfection byproduct requirements, throughout its
system. If Paris agrees to such modifications, LCWSD shall directly bear all costs of
such modification for so long as such modifications are implemented.
1.32. "V olume Charge" means the charge calculated by applying the Volume Rate to the
number of gallons of Treated Water provided to LCWSD by Paris as measured by the
Meter(s) and billed on a monthly basis. A separate volume charge will be assessed for
Treated Water delivered through the Water Distribution System, for Treated Water
delivered through the FM 79 Point of Delivery and for Treated Water produced by the
City for LCWSD from the Water Treatment Plant. For Treated Water delivered through
the Water Distribution System the volume charge assessed will consist of the volume
charge for Treated Water delivered through the Water Distribution System plus the
volume charge for Treated Water produced by the City for LCWSD from the Water
Treatment Plant. For Treated Water not delivered through the Water Distribution
System, only the volume charge for Treated Water produced by the City for LCWSD
from the Water Treatment Plant will be assessed. For Treated Water delivered through
the FM 79 Point of Delivery, the Volume Charge will include a pro-rated portion of the
Distribution System Volume Charge as shown on Exhibit 1 plus the Volume Charge for
the Water Treatment Plant.
1.33. "Volume Rate" means the dollar amount per 100 cubic feet applied to LCWSD's
metered usage of Treated Water in order to calculate the Volume Charge. A separate
volume rate will be developed in the Cost of Service Study for Treated Water delivered
through the Water Distribution System, for Treated Water delivered through the FM 79
Point of Delivery and for Treated Water produced by the City for LCWSD from the
Water Treatment Plant.
1.34. "Water Distribution System" means all facilities, structures, improvements, property,
rights, permits, licenses, and other property of any nature whatsoever, now or hereafter
owned by Paris, in connection with the storage, transportation, and delivery of Treated
Water.
1.35. "Water Rate Study" means that study prepared by R.W. Beck, Inc. on or about May 12,
2005 and which sets forth the cost allocation methodologies used to calculate the Initial
Rates under this Agreement. The Water Rate Study is Exhibit 2 to this Agreement.
5 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
1.36. "Water Treatment Plant" means all facilities structures, improvements, property,
rights, pennits, licenses, and other property of any nature whatsoever, now or hereafter
owned by Paris, in connection with the production of Treated Water.
1.37. "Wholesale Customer Class" means the class of customers or purchasers to whom,
under the tenns of a specific agreement, Paris sells and provides Treated Water for re-
sale. Currently, LCWSD is Paris' only wholesale customer.
ARTICLE II - SUPPLY OF WATER BY PARIS TO LCWSD
2.1 AGREEMENT. Subject to the limitations and conditions described in this Agreement,
Paris agrees to sell to LCWSD, and LCWSD agrees to purchase from Paris at the Points
of Delivery specified herein Treated Water in the quantities set forth in this Agreement.
The Parties agree that any and all other water supply agreements between themselves,
including but not limited to the July 17, 1967 Water Purchase Contract and all addenda,
amendments or modifications thereto, are hereby tenninated, and that, as of the Effective
Date, this Agreement is the only agreement in effect regarding the sale of Treated Water
from Paris to LCWSD.
2.2 QUANTITY AND DIVERSION RATE. Subject to Article 4.4, Paris agrees to produce
Treated Water at the Water Treatment Plant for LCWSD as needed by LCWSD up to the
Total Maximum Diversion Rate of 6,597 gallons per minute or 395,820 gallons per hour
during Phase 1 and 8,333 gallons per minute or 499,980 gallons per hour during Phase 2.
2.3 POINTS OF DELIVERY AND MAXIMUM DIVERSION RATES. Paris will
deliver Treated Water at the nonnal operating pressure prevailing in the Paris water
system to the following Points of Delivery and, subject to Article 4.4, at rates up to the
following Individual and Total Maximum Diversions Rates specified below:
a. Point of Delivery No. 3A shall be through an existing 10 inch meter located
at the City's Water Treatment Plant.
b. Point of Delivery No. 3B shall be through an existing 8 inch meter located
at the City' s Water Treatment Plant.
c. Point of Delivery No. 1 shall be through an existing 8 inch meter located at
the intersection ofF.M. 79 and CR 31300.
d. Point of Delivery No. 4 shall be through an existing 6 inch meter located
adjacent to U.S. 82 E approximately 100 feet west of 42 N.E.
e. Point of Delivery No.7 shall be through an existing 4-inch meter located
adjacent to U.S. 82 W approximately 1,900 feet east of the intersection of
U.S. 82 Wand F.M. 1510.
6 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
f. Point of Delivery No. 6 shall be located at the site of a currently unused
meter located 25- feet SSE from the center line of C.R. 21500,
approximately 100-feet ENE from the center line ofF.M. 137
g. Point of Delivery No. 5 shall be located at the site of a currently unused
meter located 790- feet south of the center line of the outside portion of the
Loop 53-feet east of the center line ofF.M. 1497.
h. Point of Delivery No. 8 shall be located at the site of a currently unused
meter located 67-feet NW of the center line ofF.M. 195 and 45-feet SW of
the center line of Aspen Drive.
I. Additional Points of Delivery, including Points of Delivery from the City's
water plant or low-pressure transmission facilities between the City's water
treatment plant and groundwater storage facility located between Loop 286
and Center Street, may be established provided that the creation and
operation of such additional Points of Delivery may not impair Paris'
current and planned operation of its water system, or its ability to meet its
obligation to its current or projected customers. LCWSD shall notify Paris
in writing if LCWSD desires to establish an additional Point of Delivery.
Paris agrees to cooperate with LCWSD by providing infonnation needed
for LCWSD to develop plans for the design and operation of an additional
Point of Delivery. Where appropriate, such plans shall include adequate
storage to buffer impacts on Paris' system. Design plans and specifications
and an operations plan prepared and sealed by a registered professional
engineer for each additional Point of Delivery must be submitted to and
approved by Paris before construction may commence. Paris shall have the
right of inspection to ensure that facilities are constructed and operated
pursuant to approved plans. LCWSD shall bear all costs associated with
establishing each additional Point of Delivery. The costs associated with
taking water at any additional Point of Delivery shall be calculated based
upon the pricing structure in effect for current Points of Delivery. Further,
costs associated with the City's distribution system shall only be assessed
against each Additional Point of Delivery in proportion to its use of the
distribution system, if any. At the current time, the low pressure facilities
between the plant and the groundwater storage facilities located between
Loop 286 and Center Street are not distribution facilities.
J. Individual Maximum Diversion Rates shall not exceed the rates specified in
Table I:
7 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
Table I
Points of Delivery Individual Maximum Diversion Rate (~ph)
Phase 1 Phase 2
1 104,400 I TBD
3A & 3B* 240,000 (combined) TBD
4 54,900 TBD
5 TBD TBD
6 TBD TBD
7 58,800 TBD
8 TBD TBD
* Points of Delivery 3A & 38 are the only Points of Delivery that are not located on Paris' Distribution System at the
currcnt timc. The Parties acknowledge that LCWSD may, in the future, elect to take all the water authorized by this
Agreement through Points of Delivery 3A, 38, and additional points of delivery constructcd pursuant to ~ 2.3(i) at the
City's water treatment plant or low-pressurc transmission facilities. If this occurs, LCWSD may, subject to the
rcquircmcnts of 2.3(i), including the requirement to construct adequate storage to buffer impacts on Paris' system, take
from Paris' systcm, including such storage constructed before the Point of Delivery, up to, but not more than, 395,820
gph in Phase I and 499,980 gph in Phase 2.
For purposes of determining the Total Maximum Diversion Rate, metered water
deliveries at Points of Delivery Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 located on the Water Distribution
System shall incorporate an adjustment for the lesser of 10% or the actual percentage of
water lost and unaccounted for in the Water Distribution System as determined in Paris'
most recent study of lost and unaccounted for water. Metered water deliveries at Point of
Delivery No. 1 located on the Water Distribution System shall incorporate an adjustment
of 9% for lost and unaccounted for water. Individual Maximum Diversion Rates at
Points of Delivery Nos. 3A and 3B located on the Water Treatment System and future
Points of Delivery on the low-pressure transmission facilities described in 2.3.i do not
incorporate adjustments for water lost and unaccounted in the Water Treatment System.
Individual Maximum Diversion rates for Points of Delivery 6, 7, and 8 during Phase 1
and all Points of Delivery during Phase 2 will be established by a written agreement
between Paris and LCWSD acting through their City Manager and General Manager
respectively. In the future, the Individual Maximum Diversion Rates or initial Points of
Delivery may be changed or new Points of Delivery may be added by written agreement
between Paris and LCWSD acting through their City Manager and General Manager
respectively. Individual Maximum Diversion Rates for future Points of Delivery located
on the Water Distribution System will incorporate adjustments for the lesser of 10% or
the actual percentage of water lost and unaccounted in the Water Distribution System.
Individual Maximum Diversion Rates for future Points of Delivery located on the Water
Treatment System will not incorporate adjustments for water lost and unaccounted in the
Water Distribution System. The Total Maximum Diversion Rate of 6,597 gallons per
minute or 395,820 gallons per hour in Phase 1, adjusted for water lost and unaccounted
for and 8,333 gallons per minute or 499,980 gallons per hour in Phase 2, adjusted for
water lost and unaccounted for, shall not be exceeded. LCWSD shall bear all costs of
connecting to Paris' system at each Point of Delivery. LCWSD agrees that each new
connection to Paris' facilities shall be approved by the City and that LCWSD's request
for such approvals shall be accompanied by an engineering report and plans prepared by
8 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Watcr Contract
a Texas Registered Professional Engineer which detail the area to be served and includes
the gallons per hour of water to be delivered to the requested Point of Delivery.
ESTIMATED TREATED WATER REQUIREMENTS.
2.4 MAXIMUM HOUR CAPACITY DEMAND. Subject to Article 4.4, LCWSD's
Maximum Hour Capacity Demand to be produced by the Water Treatment Plant is
395,820 gallons per hour (gph) in Phase I and 499,980 gallons per hour (gph) in Phase 2.
LCWSD shall provide Paris written notification requesting expansion of Paris' water
supply and treatment system sufficient to allow the City to provide LCWSD 499,980 gph
of Treated Water measured at the City's Water Treatment Plant three years prior to the
commencement of Phase 2. If Paris elects to expand its water supply and treatment
system for reasons other than the commencing of Phase 2, it shall notify LCWSD of its
plans so LCWSD may consider any economy of scale in participating in such expansion
and may request that such expansion include Phase 2.
2.5 NO MINIMUM PRESSURE GUARANTEED. Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement, Paris does not represent or guarantee to LCWSD that Treated Water
provided to LCWSD under this Agreement will be provided at any specific minimum
pressure at the Points of Delivery, and Paris is under no obligation with respect thereto.
LCWSD understands and acknowledges that maintaining a certain pressure in its delivery
system requires the use of storage or pumps on LCWSD's system.
2.6 LIMITATIONS ON TAKING TREATED WATER. LCWSD agrees that it shall not
take Treated Water from any or all of the Points of Delivery at a combined instantaneous
rate greater than the Total Maximum Diversion Rate identified in Articles 2.2, 2.3 and
4.4, as appropriate, without first obtaining the written consent of Paris. The rate at which
LCWSD takes Treated Water from Paris shall be regulated by rate-of-flow controllers or
alternative methods approved in writing by Paris, paid for and installed by LCWSD. If
requested by Paris, LCWSD will convey the rate-of-flow controllers or approved
alternative methods used to regulate the take of treated water to Paris without cost, and
Paris shall be responsible for maintaining same. If it is necessary to replace a rate-of-
flow controller or approved alternative method of regulating take, LCWSD will pay for
such costs. If Lamar County ever takes Treated Water from any or all of the Points of
Delivery at a combined instantaneous rate greater than the Total Maximum Diversion
Rates identified in Articles 2.2 and 4.4, as appropriate, without first obtaining the written
consent of Paris, Paris may install and operate such additional rate-of- flow controllers or
other equipment needed to ensure compliance with the Total Maximum Diversion Rate.
LCWSD shall directly bear the cost of such equipment and its installation.
2.7 ADDITIONAL WATER. To the extent that Treated Water is available in amounts
greater than the Total Maximum Diversion Rate, Paris may, at its sole discretion, provide
LCWSD with additional Treated Water subject to the water rate and Excess Demand
Charge described in Articles 3.2 and 3.3 of this Agreement. Should Paris elect to provide
LCWSD with Treated Water in excess of the Total Maximum Diversion Rate, Paris may
tenninate or reduce providing Treated Water at those excess diversion rates or amounts
9 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
by providing LCWSD with twenty-four hours written notice of such tennination or
reduction. LCWSD agrees that Paris will never be obligated during the tenn of this
Agreement to make Treated Water available to LCWSD in excess of the Total Maximum
Diversion Rate. The purchase of any additional supplies of Treated Water over the Total
Maximum Diversion Rate does not guarantee that Paris will make Treated Water
available on that basis at any time other than the time frame Paris elects to provide
additional supplies of Treated Water to LCWSD.
2.8 METERING FACILITIES AND BACK FLOW PREVENTION DEVICES.
a. LCWSD's Duty to Install. Paris shall fumish and install at LCWSD's cost at
each Point of Delivery metering facilities and check valves that shall be
satisfactory to Paris. Such metering facilities and check valves shall be
installed for Points of Delivery 1, 3A, 3B, 4 and 7 within ninety (90) days of
the Effective Date. Such metering facilities and check valves shall be
installed for Points of Delivery 5, 6 and 8 and any future Points of Delivery
before water is delivered through that Point of Delivery. LCWSD will own,
operate and maintain the check valves. Paris shall own the metering facilities
and shall be responsible for maintaining same, subject to LCWSD's obligation
to pay for calibration of metering equipment on an annual basis. If it is
necessary to replace a metering facility, LCWSD will pay for such costs.
LCWSD may, at its own cost, install a check meter at the Points of Delivery
on its Treated Water distribution lines.
b. Capabilities of Metering Facilities. The metering facilities shall measure
and continuously record and total the amount of Treated Water delivered to
LCWSD in order to detem1ine accurately the amount of Treated Water
delivered on an hourly basis. Metering facilities shall include continuous flow
chart-recording devices, and telemetry systems that report meter readings to
the City of Paris water treatment plant located at Lake Crook Road, Paris,
Texas. Each metering facility shall also include a pressure transducer to
measure pressure on the City's side of the meter.
c. Access to Metering Equipment. Paris shall at all times have free access to
the metering equipment and all other facilities under this Agreement provided
for the purpose of: (1) shutting off Treated Water for LCWSD' s failure to pay
as required under this Agreement; (2) reading the registrations of said meters;
and (3) examining, shutting off and testing the same to ascertain whether they
are in good condition and repair, and to make such repairs upon the same as
may be necessary.
2.9 CALIBRATION OF METERS.
a. Duty to Calibrate. Paris shall service and calibrate the metering facilities as
necessary, but no less frequently than once every twelve months, commencing
within 150 days from the effective date of this Agreement. The method of
10 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
calibration shall be by replacement of the meter chamber with a factory
calibrated or recalibrated chamber from the meter manufacturer or equivalent.
Paris, at its cost, shall purchase for each meter in service on the Effective Date
a spare meter chamber that will be used as the initial replacement. The cost of
the annual calibration shall be divided equally between LCWSD and Paris.
Paris will notify LCWSD at least seventy-two (72) hours in advance of any
testing and/or calibration and LCWSD shall have the right to witness any such
testing.
b. Inaccuracy. In the event the percentage of accuracy for such metering
equipment is found to be within a tolerance of plus or minus two (2) percent,
such meter shall be deemed to have correctly measured the quantity of Treated
Water taken hereunder. If, however, such tolerance is found to be in excess of
plus or minus two (2) percent, then such meter shall be adjusted at once to
register correctly and accurately and the registration thereof shall be corrected
by the City's Director of Finance for a period extending back to the time when
such inaccuracy began, if such time is ascertainable. If such time is not
ascertainable, then registration thereof shall be corrected for a period
extending back one-half of the time elapsed since the last date of calibration,
but in no event further back than a period of six (6) months.
c. Meter Out of Service - No Readings. If any meter fails to register for any
period, the amount of Treated Water furnished during such period shall be
deemed to be the average of the correct readings for the same or equivalent
months in the preceding three years, or, if available and in lieu of said three
year average, based on such other method that would more accurately reflect
the actual consumption for the period in which the meter failure occurred as
mutually agreed upon by the City and LCWSD.
2.10 SOLE SUPPLY INTENDED. LCWSD and Paris agree that Paris shall provide the sole
source of Treated Water for the operation of the LCWSD system during the term of this
Agreement and the Parties do not construe this Agreement to provide for supplemental,
backup, peak load, or as-available service. If within the term of this Agreement LCWSD
ceases to take Treated Water from Paris because other water supplies have been
developed or acquired, LCWSD shall for the balance of this contract remain liable for
Capacity Charges at the Maximum Hour Capacity Demand level in effect at such
cessation. This obligation, once established, shall serve as liquidated damages and is
intended to compensate Paris for the expenditures incurred on LCWSD's behalf for the
cost of installation of treatment facilities. It is agreed by the Parties that such liquated
damages are a reasonable substitute for compensatory damages that are difficult or
impossible to calculate herein. This obligation is intended by the Parties not to be a
penalty, but instead, a reasonable measure of damages.
2.11 LCWSD'S REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. LCWSD acknowledges and agrees
that this Agreement defines the extent of Paris' obligations to supply Treated Water to
LCWSD and that, except as expressly provided by this Agreement, Paris is under no
11 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
obligation to provide LCWSD with a sufficient amount of Treated Water for LCWSD to
meet its minimum production, storage, service pump, or pressure maintenance
requirements, or any other requirements imposed on LCWSD by virtue of 30 Texas
Administrative Code Chapters 290 or 291, or any other Regulatory Requirements.
ARTICLE III - RATES, BILLING AND PAYMENT
3.1 CHARGES FOR WATER. LCWSD will pay to Paris the fees and charges for the
Treated Water delivered by Paris that may include Late Fees, and rates to be applied for
the Capacity Charge, Demand Charge, Volume Charge, and Excess Demand Charge.
3.2 WATER RATES.
a. Initial Rates. Upon the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Volume Rate
and the Demand Rate for water supplied from Paris' Water Treatment Plant
(Points of Delivery 3A and 3B), the FM 79 connection (Point of Delivery 1)
and Paris' Water Distribution System (Points of Delivery 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8),
respectively, as well as the Capacity Charge, shall be as set out in Exhibit 1.
b. Annual Cost of Service Study and Subsequent Annual Rates. The Volume
Rate, Demand Rate, and Capacity Charge shall be recalculated in a cost of
service study and set annually prior to the beginning of a new Rate Year.
c. Cost and Rate Methodology. The initial rates and subsequent annual rates
that LCWSD pays to Paris for Treated Water shall be calculated in accordance
with the cost allocation methodologies described and contained within the
Water Rate Study and the rate methodologies contained within Exhibit 1
except as provided in Article 3.2 (d) below. The cost and rate methodologies
set forth in the Water Rate Study and Exhibit 1 are hereby specifically agreed
to between LCWSD and Paris. Those methodologies include the following
principles:
1. the "Cash Basis" methodology for rate settings;
2. the "Base/Extra Capacity" cost allocations methodology, as sanctioned
by the American W ater Works Association;
3. the Cost of Service Study based on historical accumulated cost and
Treated Water consumption and production data for the Test Year,
adjusted for known and measurable changes;
4. Capacity Charge. Allocation for the Capacity Charge shall be based
on the Phase 1 Maximum Hour Capacity Demand as a percentage of
the Initial Rated Plant Capacity. The allocation percentage shall be
applied to the capital cost requirements (e.g. debt service, cash capital
outlays, etc.) of the Water Treatment System, as shown in Exhibit 1.
12 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treatcd Watcr Contract
For Phase 2, the Capacity Charge will additionally incorporate the
direct assignment to LCWSD of the capital costs reflective of
increasing the Maximum Hour Capacity Demand from 395,820
gallons per hour (gph) to 499,980 gallons per hour (gph). Capital costs
incurred for increases in Rated Plant Capacity not associated with
maintaining the Initial Rated Plant Capacity or not associated with the
provision of Treated Water to LCWSD shall not be assigned to
LCWSD. Unless mutually agreed upon by the Parties, the Maximum
Hour Capacity Demand applied in the Capacity Charge determination
will not exceed the Maximum Hour Capacity Demand as provided in
Article 2.4 of this Agreement.
5. Water Treatment Plant Demand Charge. Allocation for the Demand
Charge for the Treated Water produced by the City for LCWSD from
the Water Treatment Plant will be based on the Test Year Maximum
Day Metered Demand at the delivery points as identified in Article
2.3, adjusted for lost and unaccounted for water, as provided in Article
2.3, and known and measurable changes.
6. Water Distribution Demand Charge. Allocation for the Demand
Charge for Treated Water delivered through the Water Distribution
System will be based on the Test Year Distribution Maximum Day
Metered Demand, adjusted for known and measurable changes.
7. Water Treatment Plant Volume Charge. Allocation for the Volume
Charge for the Treated Water produced by the City for LCWSD from
the Water Treatment Plant will be based on the Test Year total water
consumption for LCWSD as measured at the delivery points identified
in Article 2.3, adjusted for lost and unaccounted for water, as provided
in Article 2.3, and known and measurable changes.
8. Water Distribution Volume Charge. Allocation for the Volume
Charge for Treated Water delivered through the Water Distribution
System will be based on the total water delivered through the Water
Distribution System, adjusted for known and measurable changes.
d. Review and Update of Cost Methodology. On or before June 1,2010 and
every five years thereafter during the tenn of this Agreement, the cost
methodologies contained in the Water Rate Study will be reviewed by Paris
and LCWSD. The cost methodologies may be modified by agreement of the
Pmiies to reflect changed circumstances, change regulatory requirements, and
to ensure that Paris is recovering the cost of providing service under this
Agreement. If the Parties are unable to reach agreement concerning
modification of cost methodologies within one hundred twenty (120) days
following the first meeting between the Parties to review such cost
13 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
methodologies, the Parties agree to submit this issue to binding arbitration
pursuant to Chapter 171 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
3.3 BILLING AND PAYMENT.
(a) Volume Charge. Each month during the term of this Agreement, Paris shall
read the Meter(s) measuring Treated Water being provided to LCWSD. The
numbers of gallons of Treated Water measured by the Meter( s) will be
multiplied by the appropriate Volume Rate to get the Volume Charge. Paris
shall prepare and deliver to LCWSD a statement showing the Volume Charge
for all Treated Water delivered to LCWSD, in addition to the monthly
Demand Charge and Capacity Charge. Payment shall be made by the 1Qth day
after receipt of the statement.
(b) Demand Charge. The Demand Charge shall be paid in twelve equal monthly
installments with the payment for the Volume Charge and Capacity Charge.
(c) Capacity Charge. The Capacity Charge shall be paid in twelve equal
monthly installments with the payment for the Volume Charge and Demand
Charge.
(d) Excess Demand Charge. If LCWSD's actual total coincidental Individual
Maximum Diversion Rates exceed the Maximum Hour Capacity Demand,
LCWSD shall also pay to Paris the Excess Demand Charge. The Excess
Demand Charge shall be calculated by subtracting the Maximum Hour
Capacity Demand from LCWSD's actual total coincidental Individual
Maximum Diversion Rates to determine the Excess Demand. The Excess
Demand, stated in gallons per hour, shall be applied to the Rate Year's
Capacity Charge expressed in dollars per gallons per hour and then multiplied
by a factor of 1.5 times. LCWSD shall be notified within thirty (30) days of
Paris' determination that LCWSD has exceeded its Maximum Hour Capacity
Demand. LCWSD shall be provided the Excess Demand Charge billing on or
before June 1 sl of the subsequent Rate Year with full payment due within
thirty (30) days from receipt of invoices. During a temporary emergency
condition created by unforeseeable mechanical failure or by unprecedented
high rate of Treated Water usage, such as might result from a major fire or a
major water main break, it may be necessary that Treated Water be withdrawn
from the Paris system at a rate of usage in excess of that required for the
Maximum Hour Capacity Demand. It is agreed that the Excess Demand
Charge that would normally be applicable shall not apply for such bona fide
emergency withdrawals provided that Paris is notified in writing within 10
days of LCWSD's notification by Paris that LCWSD exceeded the Maximum
Hour Capacity Demand. In any event, the Volume Charge for all Treated
Water delivered shall be due and payable as described elsewhere herein.
14 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
(e) Late Fees. If LCWSD is late in the payment of any charge or fee due and
payable to Paris under this Agreement, late payments shall bear per annum
interest at a rate equal to the lesser of two percentage points (2%) above the
Prime Interest Rate as published in the Wall Street Journal on the day said
statement becomes delinquent, or the maximum allowed by law to be charged
to LCWSD. If any charges remain unpaid at the expiration of thirty (30) days
after receipt of the statement, LCWSD shall be in default under this
Agreement, and Paris may invoke the remedies specified herein.
3.4 BILLING QUESTIONS AND DISPUTES.
(a) Statement Dispute; Protest. If LCWSD has a protest or dispute concerning a
statement, LCWSD shall notify Paris in writing within twenty (20) days of
receipt of said statement. LCWSD shall pay the portion of the statement that
is not being disputed or protested. Upon written notification, the portion of
the statement under dispute or protest (provided the dispute or protest is made
in good faith and is not unreasonable) will be set aside until resolved and will
not be subject to the penalties (such as Late Fess and Excess Demand Charge)
stated herein. If Paris is not notified in writing, postmarked within twenty
(20) days of receipt of said statement, said protest or dispute shall be
considered waived.
(I) The Parties will negotiate in good faith to resolve the dispute. The
Parties shall agree to submit the dispute to non-binding mediation as
provided in Article 10.1.
(b) Inspection and Audit. Complete records and accounts, required to be
maintained by each Party, shall be kept for a period of five (5) years. Each
Party shall at all times, upon notice, have the right at reasonable times to
examine and inspect said records and accounts during normal business hours.
If required by any law, rule or regulation, a Party shall make said records and
accounts available to federal and/or state auditors.
3.5 RATE CASE EXPENSES. LCWSD and Paris recognize and agree that Paris has
entered and may enter into other wholesale water supply agreements with other
customers, including other cities, water districts, and retail public utilities. LCWSD and
Paris agree that if any legal or administrative proceeding is hereafter instituted by
LCWSD or any other wholesale water customer of Paris that in any way relates to the
rates, the methodology set forth in the Water Rate Study or the methodology or rate
model used in performing the Cost of Service Study to establish rates, or terms related to
water supply service provided by Paris, the reasonable expenses incurred by Paris in
participating in such proceedings shall be deemed to be expenses borne by Paris that are
incurred for the benefit of, and are solely attributable to, the Wholesale Customer Class
of Paris and are not incurred for the benefit of, or attributable to, Paris' retail customers.
Accordingly, all such reasonable expenses of Paris shall be included in the operation and
maintenance expenses of Paris in setting rates for the Wholesale Customer Class, subject
15 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Trcated Watcr Contract
to a finding by the regulatory authority that the rate case expenses incurred by Paris were
reasonable and necessary.
3.6 PLEDGE OF REVENUES. LCWSD represents and has detennined that the Treated
Water supply to be obtained from Paris is of critical importance to the present and future
operation of its water system and is the most efficient and readily available source of an
adequate supply of Treated Water and, therefore, all payments required by this
Agreement to be made by LCWSD shall constitute reasonable and necessary operating
expenses of LCWSD's water utility system with the effect that the obligation to make
such payments from revenues from the system shall have priority over any obligation to
make any payments from such revenues, whether principal, interest, or otherwise, with
respect to all bonds heretofore or hereafter issued by LCWSD.
3.7 LCWSD'S DUTY TO FIX AND COLLECT RATES. LCWSD agrees throughout the
tenn of this Agreement to operate and maintain its water system continuously and to fix
and collect such rates and charges for water services to be supplied by its water system as
will produce revenues in an amount equal to at least (i) all of its payments under this
Agreement and (ii) all other amounts as required by the provisions of ordinances or
resolutions authorizing its revenue bonds or other obligations now or hereafter
outstanding.
ARTICLE IV - RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS
4.1 WATER UTILITY SERVICE IN PARIS' CORPORATE LIMITS AND ETJ.
LCWSD and Paris agree that Paris shall have the first right to provide water utility
service to any new customer located within the city's corporate limits or extraterritorial
jurisdiction as such limits currently exist or may hereafter be modified. If Paris fails to
agree to provide service to such new customer within the thirty (30) days following its
receipt of a written request, LCWSD may provide water utility service to the customer.
In return for the Treated Water provided pursuant to this Agreement, LCWSD consents to
the adjustment of the Certificates of Convenience and Necessity of Paris and LCWSD to
authorize Paris to provide water utility service to such new customers it agrees to serve
pursuant to Article 4.1 or 4.2. Both Parties agree that this Agreement will be submitted
to TCEQ for approval pursuant to Tex. Water Code ~ 13.248.
4.2 WATER UTILITY SERVICE OUTSIDE PARIS' CORPORATE LIMITS AND
ET J. LCWSD and Paris agree that LCWSD shall have the first right to provide Treated
Water to any new customer outside of the City's corporate limits and Ell as it now exists
or may hereafter be modified. If LCWSD fails to agree to provide service to such new
customers within thirty (30) days following its receipt of a written request, Paris may
provide Treated Water utility service to the customer.
4.3 LCWSD SUPPLY OF TREATED WATER TO PARIS. LCWSD agrees to supply
Treated Water to Paris in quantities and at pressures prevalent within LCWSD's system
sufficient for the City to provide continuous and adequate retail water service to its
customers within the Wildwood and Hills subdivisions and any new City customer that
16 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
Paris hereafter requests to be added to LCWSD's distribution system in the City's
corporate limits or extraterritorial jurisdiction. The customer shall bear any cost of
connecting to LCWSD's distribution system. The Point of Delivery for such Treated
Water shall be at the individual customer meter for each of the City customers who
receive water from the LCWSD Water Distribution System. The City shall provide
LCWSD an offset for each gallon of water delivered through LCWSD's water
distribution system to the City's customer equal to the City's water distribution system
rate then in effect and charged to LCWSD. The Maximum Hour Capacity Demand shall
be adjusted to reflect the LCWSD metered purchased water from the City, which has
been utilized by LCWSD in providing service to customers of the City, for purposes of
prompting the Excess Demand Charge. The Maximum Hour Capacity Demand shall be
reduced by the hourly demand of the City customers supplied water by LCWSD. Hourly
demand of the City cllstomers supplied water by LCWSD shall be determined by
increasing the Test Year average daily water consumption of the City customers supplied
water by LCWSD by 10% for lost and unaccounted for water on LCWSD water
distribution system and the lesser of 10% or the actual percentage of water lost and
unaccounted for in the Water Distribution System, then grossing up this figure by the
maximum day to average day ratio of the metered water purchased by LCWSD through
the Water Distribution System. This maximum day figure shall be grossed up by a factor
of 1.5 to reflect the maximum hourly demand of the City customers supplied water by
LCWSD.
4.4 NON-PEAK DEMAND ADJUSTMENTS. The Individual and Total Maximum
Diversion Rates specified in Articles 2.2 and 2.3 are based on LCWSD's Current Water
U sage Pattern, which reflects peak demand during summer months, and the peak
production capacity of the City's Water Treatment Plant. For Phase 1, during the months
of November through March the Total Maximum Diversion Rate that Paris is required to
deliver shall not exceed the Phase 1 Total Maximum Diversion Rate divided by the Initial
Rated Plant Capacity (395,820 gph / 1,333,333 gph) times the reliable production
capacity of the City's Water Treatment Plant, occurring during the months of November
through March. For Phase 2, during the months of November through March the Total
Maximum Diversion Rate that Paris is required to deliver shall not exceed the Phase 1
Total Maximum Diversion Rate divided by the Initial Rated Plant Capacity (395,820 gph
/ 1,333,333 gph) times the reliable production capacity of the City's Water Treatment
Plant, occurring during the months of November through March plus the difference in
Phase 1 and Phase 2 Total Maximum Diversion Rates, 104,160 gph (499,980 gph -
395,820 gph). During the tenn of this Agreement, should the Rated Plant Capacity be
determined by applicable state criteria to be less than the then current Rated Plant
Capacity, the Total Maximum Diversion Rate shall be proportionally reduced to reflect
the reduction in Rated Plant Capacity.
4.5 ALTERNATE CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS. LCWSD shall provide Paris a copy
of its request for approval of alternative capacity requirements specified in TCEQ's rules
that LCWSD hereafter files with TCEQ.
17 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
4.6 AMENDMENT TO LCWSD'S OR PARIS' CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE
AND NECESSITY. LCWSD agrees that it will not amend its CCN to increase its
service area within the corporate limits of Paris or the City of Paris' extraterritorial
jurisdiction without the prior written consent of Paris. Except as provided in Article 4.1,
Paris agrees that it will not amend its CCN to increase its service area within an area
then-celiificated to LCWSD without the prior written consent ofLCWSD.
4.7 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. All water utility facilities to be constructed by, for,
or on behalf of LCWSD within Paris' corporate limits or its extraterritorial jurisdiction
other than routine maintenance and repairs of existing facilities, shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with sound engineering practices and Paris' standards. The
plans and specifications shall be subject to review and approval by Paris before
commencement of construction. Further, Paris shall have the right of inspection during
construction.
4.8 WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT.
(a) Water Conservation. LCWSD shall cooperate with and assist Paris in its
efforts to develop and implement plans, programs, and rules to develop water
resources and to promote practices, techniques, and technologies that will
reduce the consumption of Treated Water, reduce the loss or waste of Treated
Water, improve the efficiency in use of Treated Water, or increase the
recycling and reuse of water. This may include the development of any
conservation or rationing plans by either Paris or LCWSD that may be
necessary or appropriate to address operational constraints, whether or not the
same are required by any state or federal regulatory agency. LCWSD agrees
to develop and implement drought contingency and conservation plans or
measures required by federal or state agencies or other regulatory jurisdictions,
including but not limited to the requirements of 30 T AC Chapter 9288.
LCWSD shall provide a copy of such plan to Paris within 10 days following
its adoption. Such plans shall be consistent with and as stringent as Paris'
adopted plans. If Paris determines that LCWSD's plans do not meet this
standard, Paris shall notify LCWSD in writing. LCWSD shall then amend its
plans and resubmit the plans to Paris for review.
(b) Demand Management. If Paris shall manage demand through rationing the
use of Treated Water to its retail customers, then a proportional rationing of
Treated Water supplied to LCWSD by Paris shall be instituted, at Paris'
option, without liability to LCWSD. Rationing does not relieve LCWSD from
its obligation to pay the monthly Demand Charge and Capacity Charge.
(c) Temporary Rationing. Where emergency conditions dictate temporary
conservation or rationing requirements for either Paris or LCWSD, either Party
may implement any measures considered appropriate by it to alleviate the
emergency conditions. If LCWSD implements measures to alleviate an
emergency condition, LCWSD shall notify Paris in writing within five (5)
18 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
days. Action taken under this sub Article does not relieve LCWSD from its
obligation to pay the monthly Demand Charge and Capacity Charge.
4.9 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. This Agreement is subject to Regulatory
Requirements. However, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a
waiver of any right to question or contest any law, ordinance, order, rule or regulation in
any forum having jurisdiction, and Paris and LCWSD each agree to make a good faith
effort to support proposed laws and regulations that would be consistent with the
perfOlmance of this Agreement in accordance with its tenns. Paris and LCWSD agree to
secure all Approvals as necessary and to maintain compliance with all their Approvals as
necessary to fulfill their obligations hereunder in compliance with all Regulatory
Requirements.
ARTICLE V - TERM
5.1 TERM. The tenn of this Agreement is twenty (20) years from the Effective Date unless
earlier tenninated in accordance with the provisions hereof. LCWSD agrees that Paris
has no duty or obligation to provide Treated Water, or any other type of water, to
LCWSD after expiration or tennination of this Agreement.
5.2 RENEWAL. This Agreement may be renewed and extended for up to four successive
periods of five (5) years each upon mutual written agreement by the Parties to extend the
tel111 of this Agreement. If LCWSD desires to extend this Agreement, it will provide
written notice of its request to renew the Agreement at least one (1) year prior to the
te1l11ination date of the Agreement. If at least one (l) year prior to the expiration date of
this Agreement or its subsequent extension LCWSD has not provided Paris notice that it
intends to renew, LCWSD shall provide Paris evidence that LCWSD has secured an
alternative and sufficient water supply. This requirement is enforceable by specific
perfonnance.
ARTICLE VI - EVENTS OF DEFAULT; TERMINATION
6.1 DEFAULT BY LCWSD. In addition to the other tennination provisions of this
Agreement, each of the following events or conditions shall constitute an "Event of
Default" by LCWSD hereunder for which Paris may te1l11inate the Agreement as
provided in Article 6.4:
(a) LCWSD fails to observe or perfonn any of its covenants or material duties or
obligations contemplated by this Agreement, and such failure is not cured within
thirty (30) days after notice thereof from Paris;
(b) LCWSD (i) files a petition or otherwise commences, authorizes or acquiesces in
the commencement of a proceeding or cause under any bankruptcy or similar law
for the protection of creditors, or have such petition filed against it, and such
19 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Watcr Contract
proceeding remains uncontested for sixty (60) days or (ii) otherwise becomes
bankrupt or insolvent (however evidenced); or
(c) Any representation or warranty fumished by LCWSD is false or misleading in
any material respect when made.
6.2 DEF AUL T BY PARIS. In addition to the other tennination provisions of this
Agreement, each of the following events or conditions shall constitute an "Event of
Default" by Paris hereunder for which LCWSD may tenninate the Agreement as
provided in Article 6.4:
(a) Paris fails to observe or perfonn any of its covenants or material duties or
obligations contemplated by this Agreement, and such failure is not cured within
thirty (30) days after notice thereof from LCWSD;
(b) Paris (i) files a petition or otherwise commences, authorizes or acquiesces in the
commencement of a proceeding or cause under any bankruptcy or similar law for
the protection of creditors, or have such petition filed against it, and such
proceeding remains uncontested for sixty (60) days, or (ii) otherwise become
bankrupt or insolvent (however evidenced); or
(c) Any representation or warranty fumished by Paris is false or misleading in any
material respect when made.
6.3 REMEDIES. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the non-defaulting Party shall
have the right to the following remedies in addition to the right to terminate as provide in
Aliicle 6.4:
(a) Suspend services and withhold any payments due hereunder until the defaulting
Patiy has cured such Event of Default;
(b) In the event of a Paris Event of Default, exercise equitable remedies, specifically
limited to the right of specific perfonnance and the right of injunctive relief; and
(c) In the event of a LCWSD Event of Default, exercise all remedies available at law
or at equity, except as limited herein.
6.4 TERMINATION RIGHTS. Either Party shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement, without charge or penalty, upon the occurrence of an Event of Default by the
other Party that continues without cure for more than one hundred eighty (180)
consecutive days after notice.
ARTICLE VII - FORCE MAJEURE
7.1 FORCE MAJEURE. The term "force majeure" as employed herein shall mean acts of
God, strikes, lockouts or other industrial disturbances, acts of public enemy, war, orders
20 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
of any kind of the government of the United States or the State of Texas or any civil or
military authority, insurrections, riots, epidemics, landslides, lightning, earthquakes, fires,
hurricanes, storms, floods, droughts, washouts, water contamination, shortage in water
supply, restraints of government and people, civil disturbances, explosions, breakage or
accidents to machinery, pipelines or canals, which affects the ability of Paris to deliver
water hereunder, or of LCWSD to receive water hereunder, on account of any other
causes not reasonably within the control of the Party claiming such inability. Ifby reason
of force majeure either Party hereto is rendered unable wholly or in part to carry out its
obligations under this Agreement, other than the obligation of LCWSD to make payment
required under the terms hereof, then if such Party gives notice and full particulars of
such force majeure in writing to the other Party within a reasonable time after occurrence
of the event or cause relied on, the obligation of the Party filing such notice, so far as is
affected by such force majeure, shall be suspended during the continuance of the inability
then claimed, but for no longer period, and any such Party shall endeavor to remove or
overcome such inability with all reasonable dispatch.
ARTICLE VIII - REPRESENT A TION AND WARRANTIES
8.1 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARIS. Paris hereby represents and
warrants to LCWSD that the following are true, legal, and correct as of the Effective
Date.
( a) Paris has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business, own its
properties and execute and deliver this Agreement and perform its obligations
hereunder in accordance with the tenns hereof.
(b) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered on behalf of Paris and
constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligations of Paris, enforceable against
Paris in accordance with its tenns, except as the enforceability thereof may be
limited by bankruptcy; insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar
laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights generally and general equitable
principles.
8.2 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF LCWSD. LCWSD hereby
represents and warrants to Paris that the following are true, legal, and correct as of the
Effective Date.
(a) LCWSD has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business, own its
properties and execute and deliver this Agreement and perform its obligations
hereunder in accordance with the tenns hereof.
(b) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered on behalf of LCWSD and
constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligations of it, enforceable against it in
accordance with its tern1s, except as the enforceability thereof may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws
21 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights generally and general equitable
principles.
ARTICLE IX - OWNERSHIP, LIABILITY, AND INDEMNITY
9.1 NO JOINT OWNERSHIP. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed to create
any type of joint or equity ownership of any property, any partnership or joint venture,
nor shall same create any other rights or liabilities and LCWSD payments (whether past,
present, or future) shall not be construed as granting LCWSD partial ownership of,
prepaid capacity in, or equity in the Paris' water system.
9.2 REUSE OF RETURN FLOWS. LCWSD agrees that Paris may reuse Return Flows.
LCWSD also agrees that it shall not authorize any of its customers to reuse the Return
Flows. LCWSD agrees that Paris, but not LCWSD, is authorized to apply to the TCEQ
to indirectly reuse any Return Flows. LCWSD will receive no compensation, credit, or
offset for Paris' subsequent use and reuse of Return Flows.
9.3 RESPONSIBILITY FOR TREATED WATER. The liability for damages arising from
the proper treatment, transportation and delivery for all Treated Water provided
hereunder shall remain with Paris to the Points of Delivery and, upon passing through the
Meter(s), the liability for such damages shall pass to LCWSD. As between the City and
LCWSD, such liability for water delivered from the LCWSD distribution system to retail
customers of the City pursuant to Article 4.1 shall pass to the City upon passing through
the individual customer meter.
9.4 INDEMNITY. By signing this Agreement, LCWSD agrees on behalf of itself and its
successors and assign that it will, to the fullest extent pennitted by law, defend, protect,
indemnify and hold harmless Paris and Paris' officers, directors, employees, agents,
elected officials and consultants from and against all damages, liabilities or costs,
including reasonable attorney's fees and defense costs, to the extent caused by LCWSD's
negligent acts or omissions under this or incident to this agreement. By signing this
Agreement, Paris agrees on behalf of itself and its successors and assign that it will, to the
fullest extent pennitted by law, defend, protect, indemnify and hold hannless LCWSD
and its officers, directors, employees, agents, elected officials and consultants from and
against all damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney's fees and defense
costs, to the extent caused by Paris' negligent acts or omissions under this or incident to
this agreement.
9.5 IMMUNITIES UNDER STATE LAW. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed
as waiving sovereign immunity or any other immunity that the Parties may be entitled to
under state or federal law.
9.6 NO CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, in no event shall the Parties or any of their affiliates, by reason of any of their
respective acts or omissions relating to their obligations under this Agreement, be liable,
22 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
whether in contract, tort, misrepresentation, warranty, negligence, strict liability or
otherwise, for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of or
in connection with this Agreement, or the performance or breach thereof.
ARTICLE X - DISPUTE RESOLUTION
10.1 NONBINDING MEDIATION. The Parties agree to submit to non-binding mediation
any dispute related to the tenns of this Agreement or its implementation, other than a
dispute under Article 3.2( d), before filing a claim with an administrative agency, the
courts, or any other entity having jurisdiction to resolve such dispute. The Parties agree
to each pay one-half of the costs of the mediator's fees and associated costs. The Parties
agree that if any such dispute is not resolved within ninety (90) days of beginning the
non-binding mediation process, then either Party may seek remedies in any appropriate
forum.
ARTICLE XI - NOTICE AND COMMUNICATIONS
11.1 NOTICE AND COMMUNICATIONS. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement
all notices or communications provided herein to be in writing shall be delivered to:
If to Paris: City Manager
P.O. Box 9037
Paris, Texas 75461-9037
Fax: 903/785-8519
Ifto LCWSD: General Manager
Lamar County Water Supply District
140 CR 32180
Brookston, Texas 78421
11.2 CHANGE OF ADDRESS. Either party may change its address by giving written notice
of the change to the other party at least ten (10) days before the change becomes
effective.
ARTICLE XII - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
12.1 J OINT PREP ARA TI 0 N. This Agreement shall be considered for all purposes as
having been prepared through the joint efforts of the Parties and shall not be construed
against one Party or the other as a result of the preparation, substitution, submission or
other event of the negotiation, drafting or execution hereof.
12.2 COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument. The Parties hereto may execute this Agreement by signing any such
counterpart.
23 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
12.3 AMENDMENTS. This Agreement may not be amended, supplemented or otherwise
modified unless done so in a writing and signed by the Parties, and no provision hereof
shall be deemed waived unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the waiving Party.
12.4 NO ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the
respective Parties, including their successors, but the Agreement shall not be otherwise
assignable in whole or in part by either Paris or LCWSD without first obtaining the
written consent of the other Party.
12.5 CAPTIONS. The captions of the various articles and Articles herein are intended for
convenience or reference only and shall not define or limit any of the terms or provisions
hereof.
12.6 SEVERABILITY. Except for Article III and Article 4.1 of this Agreement, the
provisions of this Agreement are severable and if, for any reason, anyone or more of the
provisions contained in this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or
unenforceable in any respect, the invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect
any other provision of this Agreement and this Agreement shall remain in effect and be
construed as if the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained in
the Agreement. In the event any provision of this Agreement, other than Article III or
Article 4.1, is declared invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the Parties shall, upon the
request of a Party, promptly renegotiate in good faith a new provision to eliminate the
invalidity and to restore this Agreement as nearly as possible to its original intent and
effect. In the event agreement cannot be reached in such renegotiation, this Agreement
shall continue in force and effect as if it had been executed without the invalid provision.
In the event Article III or Article 4.1 is held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any
respect, Paris may terminate this Agreement without liability to LCWSD by providing
LCWSD with ninety (90) days written notice.
12.7 THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. The Parties acknowledge that there are no third
party beneficiaries to this Agreement.
12.8 RECORDS. The Parties will maintain records on site for a period of five years, or
longer if required by Regulatory Requirements.
12.9 CHOICE OF LAW. This Agreement, and the rights and obligations of the Parties under
or pursuant to this Agreement, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas.
Venue for legal actions arising hereunder shall lie exclusively in Lamar County, Texas
for matters arising under state law and exclusively in the Eastern District of Texas, Paris
Division, for matters arising under federal law.
12.10 SOLE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement of
Paris and LCWSD regarding the purchase of Treated Water and supersedes any prior
understanding or oral or written agreements between Paris and LCWSD respecting the
subject matter of this Agreement.
24 Paris/LCWSO Wholesale Treated Water Contract
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, acting under authority of their
respective governing bodies, have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and
year first written above.
SIGNED this the
day of
,2006.
City of Paris Lamar County WSD
BY: BY:
Curtis Fendley, Mayor , (title)
ATTEST: ATTEST:
Janice Ellis, City Clerk , (title)
APPROVED: APPROVED:
Tony Williams, City Manager , (title)
25 !';lIis!( '\\'SI) \\'h(}bal~ Tr~atcd \\':I1l'r ('lIllr:,,'!
STATE OF TEXAS
s
s
~
9
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
COUNTY OF LAMAR
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of
by , in his capacity as
Paris, a Texas home-rule municipality, on behalf of said municipality.
, 2006,
of the City of
Notary Public in and for
the State of Texas
ST ATE OF TEXAS
s
s
s
s
~
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
COUNTY OF LAMAR
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 2006,
by , in his capacity as of the Lamar
County Water Supply District, a Texas fresh water supply district, on behalf of said district.
Notary Public in and for
the State of Texas
26 Paris/LCWSD Wholesale Treated Water Contract
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
LAMAR COUNTY WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT (LCWSD)
SUMMARY OF WATER RATE CALCULATIONS
I Production FM 79 Distribution I
Monthly Demand $ 23,809 $ 4,628 $ 5,584
Actual Volumetric Rate (per CCF) $ 0.50 $ 0.25 $ 0.49
Actual Volumetric Rate (per 1000 gallons) 0.67 0.34 0.65
Effective Volumetric Rate (per CCF) 0.74 0.37 1.74
Effective Volumetric Rate (per 1000 gallons) 0.99 0.50 2.33
Water Taken from Water Treatment Plant
Effective Volumetric Rate (per CCF) $ 0.74
Effective Volumetric Rate (per 1000 gallons) 0.99
Water Taken from FM 79
Effective Volumetric Rate (per CCF) $ 1.11
Effective Volumetric Rate (per 1000 gallons) 1.48
Water Taken from Distribution
Effective Volumetric Rate (per CCF) $ 2.48
Effective Volumetric Rate (per 1000 gallons) 3.32
EXHIBIT ..L
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
LAMAR COUNTY WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT (LCWSD)
WATER TREATMENT PLANT RATE CALCULATIONS
Water Treatment Plant Debt Service Allocation
Max Hour(1)
Max Day(2)
Avg Day(3)
(MGD)
27.645
18.430
11.045
Base %
Max Day Extra Capacity %
Max Hour Extra Capacity %
Total
+
+
39,95% =11.045/27.645
26.71% = (18.430 -11.045) /27.645
33.33% = (27.645 -18.430) / 27,645
100.00%
Water Production Debt Service
Base
Max Day Extra Capacity
Max Hour Extra Capacity
Total Water Production Debt Service(4)
$ 400,783
+ 267,975
+ 334,379
$ 1,003,137
LCWSD Base Debt Service
LCWSD Average Day(5) (ODDs gallons)
System Average DaY'6) (0005 gallons)
LCWSD Average Day %
Base Debt Service
LCWSD Base Debt Service
2,483
10,312
24.08%
x $ 400,783
$ 96,515
LCWSD Max Dav Extra Capacity Debt Service
LCWSD Max Day Extra Capacity(6) (OOOs gallons)
System Max Day (NCP) Extra Capacity(6) (ODDs gallons)
LCWSD Max Day Extra Capacity %
Max Day Extra Capacity Debt Service
LCWSD Max Day Extra Capacity Debt Service
1,871
9,286
20.15%
x $ 267,975
$ 53,993
LCWSD Max Hour Debt Service
LCWSD Max Hou~7) (0005 gallons)
System Max Hour(S) (DaDs gallons)
LCWSD Max Hour %
Max Hour Extra Capacity Debt Service
LCWSD Max Hour Debt Service
9,500 per day
32,000 per day
29.69%
x $ 334,379
$ 99,265
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
LAMAR COUNTY WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT (LCWSD)
WATER TREATMENT PLANT RATE CALCULATIONS
Water Treatment Plant Capacity Charge
LCWSD Water Treatment Plant Capacity Costs
Max Hour Debt Service $ 99,265 Summary of WTP Rates/Charges
LCWSD Treated Water Capacity Costs $ 99,265
Operations Fee 100% Monthly Capacity Charge $ 9,099
LCWSD Water Treatment Plant Capacity Charge $ 109,192 Monthly Demand Charge 14,710
.;. 12 Total Monthly WTP Charges $ 23,809
LCWSD Monthly Water Treatment Plant Capacity Charge $ 9,099
Volumetric Rate $ 0.50 per CCF
Volumelric Rate $ 0.67 per 1000 gallons
Water Treatment Plant Demand Charge
Effective Volumetric Rate $ 0.74 per CCF
LCWSD Maximum Day/Extra Capacity Costsl41 Effective Volumetric Rate $ 0.99 per 1000 gallons
Max Day Extra Capacity Debt Service $ 53,993
Production O&M 67,039
Trans> 24" O&M 7,286
Trans> 24" Debt Service 19,104
Revenue Offsets (7,624)
LCWSD Maximum Day/Extra Capacity Costs $ 159,798
LCWSD Customer Costsl4)
Meters $ 880
Billing & Collection Debt Service 1
Billing & Collection O&M 129
Revenue Offsets (339)
LCWSD Customer Costs $ 671
LCWSD Water Treatment Plant Demand Costs $ 160,469
Operations Fee 10.0%
LCWSD Water Treatment Plant Demand Charge $ 176,516
12
Monthly Water Treatment Plant Demand Charge $ 14,710
Water Treatment Plant Volume Rate
LCWSD Average DaylBase Costsl41
Water Treatment Plant Base Debt Service $ 96,515
Supply O&M 142,683
Supply Debt Service 83,625
Production O&M 227,073
Trans> 24" Debt Service 34,146
Trans> 24" O&M 13,022
Administration Fees 47,486
Revenue OffsetS(91 (90,934)
LCWSD Average Day/Base Costs $ 553,616
Operations Fee 10.0%
Water Treatment Plant Volume Charge $ 608,978
Total LCWSD Consumption11O) 1,211,687 CCF
LCWSD Water Treatment Plant Volume Rate $ 0.50 per CCF
Total LCWSD Plant Water Revenue Requirement $ 894,686
Notes:
(1) Assumes a system maximum hour of 1,5 times the maximum day
(2) Used to functlonahze system costs: Average peak day to average day ratio (1999 - 2004) times average day
(3) Used to functionahze system costs; Average of average day from 2002 to 2004
(4) Cost per Table B-2 of City'S 2005 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service and Rate Design Study;
adjusted to reflect elevated storage reciassification
(5) Table A-1 of City's 2005 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service and Rate Design Study
Note: For illustrative purposes only. City's 2005 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service and Rate Design Study
does not incorporate lost and unaccounted for water Proposed contract will incorporate lost and unaccounted for water.
(6) Table A-1 of City's 2005 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service and Rate Design Study
(7) Contractual Maximum Hour Capacity Demand for Phase 1 of 395,820 gallons times 24 hours
(8) Rated Plant Capacity
(9) Water and Sewer Charge Offs removed
(10) Consumption per City's 2005 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service and Rate Design Study
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
LAMAR COUNTY WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT (LCWSD)
FM 79 METER DISTRIBUTION WATER RATE CALCULATIONS
Water Distribution System Demand Charge (FM 79 Meter only)
Maximum Day/Extra Capacity Debt Service
TranslDist 8" to 24"
Maximum Day/Exlra Capacity Debt Service
217,144
217,144
Summary of Distribution Rates/Charges tor FM 79
Total Monthly Demand Charge for FM 79 4,628
Maximum Day/Elctra Capacity O&M Costs
Trans/Dist 8" 10 24"
Maximum Day/Extra Capacity O&M Costs
228,905
228,905
Volumetric Rate for FM 79
Volumetnc Rate for FM 79
$ 0,25 per CCF
$ 0,34 per 1000 gallons
Total Maximum Day/Extra Capacity Costs
% of 8" 10 24" UneS Providing FM 79 Service
Maximum Day/Extra Capacity Costs for FM 79 Lines
446,049
14,08%
62,806
Effective Volumetric Rate for FM 79
Effective Volumetric Rata for FM 79
0,37 per CCF
0,50 per 1000 callons
LCWSD Distribution Extra Capacity for FM 79
Estimated Distribution Extra Capacrty for FM 79 Quadrant
LCWSD Dlstnbutlon Extra Capacity % for FM 79
0,63 MGD
1 04 MGD
80 38%
Monthly Distribution Water Demand Charge for FM 79
50,485
100%
55,535
12
4.628
LCWSD Distnbutlon Water Demand Costs for FM 79
Opomtions Fee
LCWSD Distribution Waler Demand Charge fO( FM 79
Water Distribution System Volume Rate (FM 79 Meter only)
Average DaylBase Debt Service
Trans/Dist 8" to 24"
Average Day/Base Debt Service
324,724
324,724
Average Day/Base Q&M Costs
TranslDlst 8" to 24"
Warehouse
Average Day/Base O&M Costs
342.313
52,353
394,566
Total Average Day/Bese Costs
% of 8" to 24" Lines Provldmg FM 79 Service
Average Day/Base Costs for FM 79 LineS
Franchise Fee
Total Average Day/Base Costs for FM 79 Lines
719,390
14,08%
101)93
15,610
116,903
LCWSD Distribution Average Day for FM 79
Estimeted Water Distribution System Average Day for FM 79 Quadrant
LCWSD Distribution Average Day % for FM 79
0.83 MGD
1. 04 MGD
80,38%
LCWSD Distribution Water Voiume Costs for FM 79
Operations Fee
LCWSD Distribution Water Volume Charge for FM 79
LCWSD Distribution Consumption for FM 79
LCWSD Distribution Water Volume Rate for FM 79
93,972
100%
103,369
406,714 CCF
0.25 per CCF
Sublotal LCWSD Distribution Revenue Requirement for FM 79
Less Credit for FM 79 Waler line
Total LCWSD Distnbution Revenue Requirement far FM 79
158,904
7,600
151,304
Notes
1. Costs per Table B-2 of City's 2005 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service
and Rate Design Study; adjusted to reflect elevated storage reclassification
2. Distribution System Average Day includes all water distnbuted through the City's water dlstnbution system,
Including FM 79 Meter, adjusted under the assumption that 25',1, at systam water distribution consumption
occurs m lhe quadrant the serving FM 79 Meter
3. Distribution System Extra Capacity assumeS a 2,1 peak day to average day ratio
4 LCWSD Extra Capacity for Distribution assumes a 2:1 peak day to average day ratio for LCWSD distribution water
purChaSed through FM 79 Meter
5. LCWSD FM 79 MeIer distribution consumplion per City'S 2005 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service
and Rate Design Study
6. Distribution re~enue requirement inCludes all LCWSD water purchased through the FM 79 Meter
7. Franchise Fee on Table 8.2 of City's 2005 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service
and Rate Design Study adjusted to only rallect LCWSD water taKen through FM 79 Meier.
Credit for FM 79 water line bUed on construction cost estimate of $380,000
per Mr. Reevas Hayter divided by fifty (50) year depreCiable life
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
LAMAR COUNTY WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT (LCWSD)
DISTRIBUTION (excluding FM 79 Meter) WATER RATE CALCULATIONS
Water Distribution System Demand Charge
Maximum Day/Extra Capacity Debt Service
Trans/DisI8" to 24"
Maximum Day/Extra Capacity Debt Service
217,144
217,144
Summary of Distribution Rates/Charges (excluding FM 79 Meter)
Maximum Day/Extra Capacity O&M Costs
Trans/DisIS" to 24"
Maximum Day/Extra Capacity O&M Costs
Monthly Distribution Demand Charge (exel FM 791
5,584
228,905
228,905
Distlibutlon (exel FM 79) Volumetric Rate
Dislrlbution (excl FM 79) VolumetriC Rate
0.49 per CCF
0.65 per 1000 gallons
Tolal Maximum Day/Extra Capacity Costs
446,049
LCWSD Dlslribullon Extra Capacity
Total Dlstribullon Extra Capacity
lCWSD Distribution Exlra Capacity %
0.33 MGD
2.40 MGO
1366%
Effeellve Distribution (exel FM 79) Volumetric Rate $
Effective Distribution (excl FM 79) Volumetric Rate $
1.74 per CCF
2.33 per 1000 Qallons
LCWSD Distribution Water Demand Costs
Operations Fee
LCWSD Distribution Water Demand Charge
60,915
10.0%
67,006
12
5,584
Monthly Distribution Waler Demand Charge
Water Distribution System Volume Rate
Average Day/Base Dabt Service
Trans/Dlst8" to 24"
Average Day/Base Debt SeNiee
LCWSD Distribution Average Day
T alai Water Distribution Syslem Average Day
LCWSD Distribution Average Day %
324.724
324.724
342,313
52,353
394,666
0.11 MGD
4.15 MGD
2.63%
$ 719,390
2.63%
$ 18,940
4.570
$ 23,510
23,510
10.0%
$ 25,861
53,284 CCF
049 per CCF
Average Day/Base O&M Costs
Trans/Dist 8" to 24"
Warahouse
Average Day/Base O&M Costs
Average DaylBase Costs
LCWSD Distribution Average Day %
LCWSD Average Day/Base Costs
Franchise Fee
Totai LCWSD Average Day/Base Cosls
LCWSD Distribution Waler Volume Costs
Operations Fee
LCWSD Distribution Weter Volume Charge
LCWSD Distribution Consumption
lCWSD Distribution Waler Volume Rate
Total LCWSD Distribution (excL FM 79) Revenue Requirement $ 92,867
Notes
1. Costs per Table B-2 of City's 2005 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service
and Rate Design Study; adjusted to renect elevated storage reclassification
2. Distribution System Average Day and Extra CapaCity includes all water dlstnbuted through the City's
water distribution system, including FM 79 Meter
3. LCWSD Extre Capacity for Distribution assumes a 4: 1 peak day 10 average day ralio for LCWSD dlslributlon water
(excludes FM 79 Meter)
4 LCWSD distribution consumption per City's 2005 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service
and Rate Design Study (excludes FM 79 MeIer)
Distribution revenue requiremenl includes ell LCWSO purchased through the City's distribution system,
excluding FM 79 Meter
Franchise Fee on Table B-2 of City's 2005 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service
and Rate Design Study adjusted to only reflect LCWSD water taken through City's distribution system.
f .
<< ;.
"~ .
,
Dlreetor of Fininc;
WATER AND WASTEWATER
COST OF SERVICE AND
RATE DESIGN STUDY
City of Paris, Texas
Draft Report
May 2005
n'W'~E(K
EXHIBIT l.
R'W'~r(K
May 2, 2005
Mr. Tony Williams
City Manager
City of Paris
135 First Street, S.E.
Paris, Texas 75460
Dear Mr. Williams:
The City of Paris ("City") engaged the services of R.W. Beck, Inc. to conduct a Cost of
Service and Rate Design Study for the water and wastewater operations of the City. The
attached draft report presents our findings and recommendations from the Cost of Service
and Rate Design Study.
We appreciate the opportunity to once again provide our professional services to the City
and would like to express our sincere appreciation to you and your staff members for
supplying the needed information and data to conduct the Cost of Service and Rate
Design Study.
Should you or council members require additional information or clarification regarding
the draft Cost of Service and Rate Design Study, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Jack E. Stowe, Jr. or Mr. Darrell Cline at (972) 994-0300.
Very truly yours,
f{?J ~JCt~.
R.W. Beck, Inc.
1300 E. LOOKOUT DRIVE, SUITE 145 RICHARDSON, TEXAS 75082, PHONE (972) 994-0300, FAX (972) 994-0301
1.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
Table of Contents
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
WATER AND WASTEWATER
COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY
EXECUTIVE SU11MAR Y............................................ .........................................1
CHOICE OF TEST YEAR AND ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY .............................5
ANALYSIS OF TEST YEAR DATA....... ............... ...................... .................. ........8
..
CUSTOMER CLASS DISTRIBUTION FACTORS ..................................................12
WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY FINANCIAL OPERATIONS ......................13
WATER UTILITY SYSTEM - FINANCIAL DATA................................................15
REvIEW OF WASTEWATER SYSTEM DATA .....................................................16
DETERMINATION OF TEST YEAR REVENUE REQUIREMENT ............................18
RATE DESIGN................................................................................................ .21
APPENDICIES
APPENDIX A OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF UTILITY SYSTEM
APPENDIX B CONTRACT CUSTOMERS
APPENDIX C DETERMINATION OF RETAIL W ATERAND WASTEWATER
RATES
APPENDIXD RATE DESIGN ALTERNATIVES
DRAFT REPORT
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A. Introduction
In 2004, the City of Paris ("City") entered into a treated water purchase contract with Campbell
Soup Company ("Campbell Soup"). Per the contract, a cost of service study is required prior to
May 31 st of each year to determine the rates to be charged to Campbell Soup for the next twelve-
month period. To comply with the contractual terms, the City has authorized R.W. Beck, Inc. to
perform the cost of service study. This report describes the study performed for the City and
makes recommendations with respect to rates to be charged to the City's water and wastewater
customers. The report consists of nine sections, including the Executive Summary section.
..
Also attached are three appendices to supplement the findings of the report.
Following the Executive Summary, Sections II through VI develop the methodology,
assumptions, and the revenue requirement for the water utility portion of the City's Water and
Wastewater Utility. Sections VII and VIII develop the methodology, assumptions and the
revenue requirement for the wastewater utility portion of the City's Water and Wastewater
Utility. Finally, Section IX of the report develops the rate schedules for water and wastewater
services provided by the City.
The three appendices following the report consist of Appendix A, operating characteristics of the
system, Appendix B, contract customers, Appendix C, the determination of the retail water and
wastewater rates, and Appendix D, rate design alternatives.
B. Findings of Rate Study
a. The total revenue requirement for the Water Utility portion of the test year for the
retail rate determination is estimated to be $6,225,983 (Table C-l),lan"8.2%
'lincrease from'the City's last cost 9f s~!'Yi~e._s.~4y,_ d.ue priIP~ily .to,~jllcr~~?ejn>"
relectricitY'costS?
b. The total revenue requirement for the Wastewater Utility portion of the test year
is estimated to be $4,433,774 (Table C-l), 'R'j~O%increasefrom thtij,Citfs-:last
t::C9~LQf service..sttidy;'dtfe~priffi.anly:-to"anjn~r.~~~,il!:~1~~tri.9.ity .:GQsts.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
1
DRAFT REPORT
In January 2005, thelJte'at which the City is chargedf9!$flectricity~ consumption
under its electric load aggregation agreement increased ,by~over49%,"resulting in
a forecasted increase of approximately $450,000 in annual electricity costs.
The City continues to experience a decline in water purchases. In addition,
1)~p,a_skaJII has 'significantly reduced its ~oIl~UIppti(m over 'the past yeW'. Tenaska
III anticipates IP~!C_h~sirtg"'a:ljpfo'xiriiately"one.-thiid'Of itt3'rece.nt'msloridil 'levels
for the upcoming year.
7""".,'..'''::'1''''....'1~~~._~..~.~[.~. ..:,,", -.....".".. C,'" ~... , - . '''',''-''
The City' s ~~i[~~!~~,~~~,:~.~~~~.~~!~r_}at~~_,:ar.e." ~ot,_.ge,n~~~!~g"_~~f!i~~~n.t,i
~.reve1iue.to-piee~.forec~1ed,.expencfifille.f
L.\..,. . ' '.."~_" :;.l,..;.u.:_....\-,..:...~..:u.:~-....;;..:....,:,.;. .,.........:...;.... ._.- ,<....' .-'
," ~".. ,""" ~"_'." ~ " .. _, ,_...........:"'\._.f',........-.."I'.-..... ,,..."""';"".,,...:-........,,,,.,,..............,-";..J'....,.... ..._'_::'.,~...P.....,~',....'... ,-._..-,"," --.'" .........~ "
::!~~.~.~~~~~~~:~~a.h~:.vj~:~~~~~I..~!;il_i.~'~ .,.~P~E~t~~__r~~er:es._.ar~ ~.. n.eed of I
:::r~Bf.~~~~~JIt-is imperative that the City maintain a healthy operating reserve
because of the composition of the Water Utility's revenue stream (five customers
make up approximately 40% of the Water Utility's revenues from rates). A loss
or decline in consumption of one of these customers could result in a significant
financial strain for the City.
g. In an effort to control cost, over the last few years the City has reduced its level of
spending on cash funded capital replacements. However, for the City to maintain
. reliability and quality of service, additional cash capital outlays beyond the City's
current budgeted amount must be made.
h. Waste'transporters using the City's wastewater treatment facilities are currently
c.
d.
e.
f.
charged $33.00 per 1000 gallons disposed. Many of these disposals are of
significant strength; however, the City is not currently surcharging waste
transporters for excessive strength loadings.
i. Water service contract with Tenaska III expires October 1,2005.
j. Contract customers are estimated to produce the following water revenues:
. Campbell Soup $1,107,436
. Lamar County Water Supply District $705,534
. Tenaska III $275,645
. Lamar Power $230,688
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
2
DRAFT REPORT
C. Recommendations
a. It is recommended that the City's retail water and wastewater rates be increased to
offset the forecasted shortfall, as well as to start replenishing the Water and
Wastewater Utility operating reserves and funding a capital replacement fund.
Based on a review and discussion of rate design alternatives with City Staff, the
fo ...)0 ,,,,'Q~VO\"'I'\''tI,''
agreed upon proposed rate design for City Council consideration is provided in
Section IX of this report. Additional rate design alternatives that were considered
are included in Appendix D. The following shows the increase in the average
Residential and Commercial monthly bills assuming the rates under the proposed
rate design to be presented to City Council.
RESIDENTIAL
Billing Units Water / Current Proposed Percent / Dollar
Meter Size Wastewater (CF) Monthly Bill Monthly Bill Increase
5/8" and 3/4" 750/600 $43.35 $46.40 7.0% / $3.05
COMMERCIAL
Current
Proposed Percent / Dollar
Monthly Bill Increase
$73.75 6.0% / $4.17
Meter Size
Billing Units (CF)
1,000
Monthly Bill
$69.58
5/8" and 3/4"
b. It is recommended that the City establish and maintain an operating reserve of at
least 60 days of operation and maintenance costs.
c. It is recommended that the City establish and maintain a capital replacement fund
funded by internally generated cash of at least $400,000.
d. It is recommended that the City begin immediately funding the operating reserve
and capital replacement fund. The proposed rates incorporate $200,000 for the
operating reserve fund and $200,000 for the capital replacement fund.
e. It is recommended that next year the City increase its water and wastewater rates
to reflect an annual contribution of $400,000 to the operating reserve fund, until
such time that the operating reserve requirement of 60 days of operation and
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
3
DRAFT REPORT
maintenance costs is met, and to reflect $400,000 in funding of annual capital
replacements.
f. It is recommended that the City cease receiving waste, generated outside the City,
from transporters through its wastewater treatment facilities; however, should the
City elect to continue receiving this waste, it is recommended that the City
implement its option within its existing rate ordinance to begin surcharging waste
transporters (for waste generated inside and outside the City) for excessive
strength loadings disposed at the City's wastewater treatment facilities at the
excess strength charges recommended in Table C-6. In addition to applying the
excess strength charges, it is recommended that the City charge, at cost, for
...
laboratory testing of the sampling of the waste transporters' disposals. Also, it is
recommended that, if the City begins applying the excess strength charges and
the laboratory testing fees, the $33.00 per 1000 gallons disposed be reduced to
reflect only the flow-related costs of the wastewater treatment facilities, which is
currently $1.73 per 1000 gallons of influent flow.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
4
DRAFT REPOR T
n. CHOICE OF TEST YEAR AND ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY FOR
WATER RATE STUDY
A. Test Year
In an effort to provide a more normalized level of consumption for rate making purposes, with,
~~e_'.~}(ception.:'of:Campbell~~oup.-cmd :Tenaska III, a historical average of consumption was
chosen as the "test year" for the water rate study. Campbell Soup's FY 2004 consumption was
chosen as its test year, since the FY 2004 consumption is the lowest of its recent historical
consumption and is reflective of Campbell Soup's continual decline in water purchases over the
last several years. To reflect operational changes, Tenaska Ill's consumption was forecasted
..
based on operational estimations provided by Tenaska III.
B. Allocation
The purpose of the cost allocation is to express the utility's total cost of service in terms of costs
associated with the various components of that service. This approach allows the costs to be
recovered from the customers of the system in accordance with their use of the various
components. Allocation allows the utility to achieve equity in water and wastewater rates,
assuring that the customers pay for service on the basis of their use of the system. Typically, the
allocation process is handled in steps - first, allocating costs to the various service functions and
then distributing them to customers according to their use of each function. In general, the
service costs are associated with supplying both the customer's average and peak rates of use and
with customer meter reading, accounting, billing administration, and fire service.
C. Cost Functionalization, Allocation and Distribution Method
The base-extra capacity method of functionalizing, allocating cost to service functions, and
distributing costs to customer classes is commonly used within the water utility industry. This
method recognizes the differences in the cost of providing service due to variations in average
rate of use and peak rate of use by a customer class. The method also recognizes the effects of
system diversity on costs. Costs are generally divided into three components: (a) base costs, (b)
extra capacity costs and (c) customer costs. Base costs are those that tend to vary with the total
quantity of water used plus capital costs and operation and maintenance costs needed to provide
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
5
DRAFT REPORT
service to customers under average load conditions. Extra capacity costs are those costs incurred
above the average operating conditions, and are necessary to support peaking conditions.
Customer costs are those associated with serving customers regardless of the amount of water
used, i.e., meter reading, accounting, billing, etc.
The allocation of cost between base and extra capacity components depends upon the design and
use of the particular portion of the water system being analyzed. If an asset of the water system
is designed to meet only the average demand on the system - a raw water supply reservoir for
instance - the capital costs and operation and maintenance costs for that asset are totally allocated
to the base component. If the asset is designed to provide additional capacity which is needed to
provide peak demand on the system, the capital and operating costs associated with the asset are
allocated to base and extra capacity components in the same proportion that the capacity of the
asset is used for average and peak use. The appropriate allocation factors between base and extra
capacity usually vary from system to system. Therefore, they should be detennined from actual
operating history or design criteria of the system.
The other important consideration for setting equitable rates for utility service is the
establishment of customer classes for cost distribution after costs are allocated to service
functions. A customer class should include only those customers who; (a) are in similar location
in relation to the utility, (b) use the same or similar facilities of the utility, (c) receive similar
service from the utility, and (d) place similar demands of the utility. It is important to note that
makeup of the customer class can change depending upon the particular asset that is being
allocated. A customer class that is appropriate for allocation of one type of cost, e.g., water
treatment costs, may include customers that would not be appropriate to the class when another
type of cost of assets is allocated, e.g., treated water distribution costs. The objective of cost
allocation and ultimate distribution to customer groups is to avoid cross-subsidization, and it is
important with that objective in view, differences in service commitment and service
requirement be given full consideration in detennining customer classes.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
6
DRAFT REPORT
D. Determination of Customer Classes
The City's water utility serves residential, commercial, and industrial customers. Besides these
customers, the City has three treated water contract customers, Campbell Soup, Tenaska III, and
Lamar County Water Supply District (LCWSD), a municipal utility district that retails to its own
customers. In addition, the City has a contract to provide raw water to Lamar Power Partners. It
should be noted that the contract with Marvin-Jennings Clardy WSC (MJC WSC) is no longer in
effect. MJC WSC is now classified as a commercial customer. Small industrial customers have
been grouped with commercial customers to correspond to the City's current rate structure. The
following lists the treated water customer classes isolated in the report.
a. Residential customers
b. Commercial customers (including small industry)
c. Campbell Soup
d. Tenaska III
e. Lamar County Water Supply District
Lamar Power Partners was isolated as a customer class, however, its raw water rate is calculated
separately and the revenues associated with the raw water purchases were used as an offset to
calculate the treated water rates. These adjustments help to prevent an overestimate of
consumption and an underestimate of revenues.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
7
DRAFT REPORT
IT!. ANALYSIS OF TEST YEAR DATA
A. Water Utility System Data
The City maintains daily treated water production data at the treatment plant. Over the last six
fiscal years, the City's peak to average day ratio has ranged from a high of 1.77 in FY 2000 to a
low of 1.50 in FY 2004. However, due to Tenaska Ill's change in its consumption pattern, (i.e.
lower average day use with similar peak day demand) it is anticipated that the peak to average
day ratio will increase. Table A-I in Appendix A shows the system demand and capacity factors
for the test year, reflecting the change in Tenaska Ill's consumption pattern.
B. Allocation Operation and Maintenance Expenses to Functional Cost Components
In order to recognize that certain facilities of the City's water utility system are used in common
by two, three, four or all five of the customer classes identified in Section II, five customer
groups have been formed for system cost allocation purposes. These cost factors have also been
separated into three principal components of Base, Extra Capacity, and Customer costs to
provide a means of further distributing functionalized costs to the various customer classes on
the basis of the respective responsibilities of each group for each particular cost function.
Each element of cost is allocated to functional cost components of the system on the basis of the
parameter or parameters having the most significant influence on the magnitude of the element
of cost. Operation and maintenance expenses are allocated directly to appropriate cost
components. Similarly, debt service costs are allocated to the appropriate cost functions.
C. Distribution of Functionalized Cost Components to Customer Groups
This is the final step in determining the revenue requirement of each individual group of
customers from the total revenue requirement of the water system as a whole. The
functionalized cost factors are determined for each individual customer group on the basis of
each group's annual usage characteristics.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
8
DRAFT REPORT
Due to the point -of-take of water for the treated water contract customers, transmission and
distribution costs were isolated. While the water treatment plant is used and useful in providing
service to all customers receiving treated water service, the same does not hold true for the
treated water transmission and distribution system. Campbell Soup and Tenaska III currently
receive treated water directly from transmission lines from the treatment plant, not from the
City's distribution system. LCWSD receives the bulk of their water purchases through the City's
transmission lines. In the absence of detailed distribution system analysis during peak hour flow
conditions, the treated water transmission and distribution system has been segregated by inch-
feet into three groups -lines less than 8 inches in diameter, lines between 8 inches and 24 inches
in diameter, and lines greater than 24 inches in diameter - for cost allocation purposes between
the classes of treated water customers. Table A-2 in Appendix A shows the percentages of inch-
feet of treated water transmission lines separated into the three pipe size groups.
D. Treated Water Loss Allocation
No treated water loss has been prorated to water received by Campbell Soup, Tenaska III, and
LCWSD due to the location of their point of take from the City's transmission system. Table A-
3 in Appendix A shows treated water allocation percentages to City's retail customers, Campbell
Soup, LCWSD and Tenaska III, including treated water losses allocated to the retail customers of
the City.
E. Treated 'Vater Use and Capacity Requirements of Customer Classes
To distribute functionalized system component costs to customer classes - Residential class,
Commercial class, Campbell Soup, LCWSD and T enaska III, assumptions had to be made as to
peak-day demands of Residential and Commercial classes of customers. As a result of the
fluctuations in water purchases by LCWSD, a four-year average of actual purchased volumes
was used as an estimate of its average day and peak day consumption. Campbell Soup's contract
requires a maXimum day estimation for each upcoming year. Campbell Soup estimated a
maximum day of 6.0 million gallons. Also, because Campbell Soup's consumption has been
declining over the past few years, Campbell Soup's lowest annual consumption over the past
four fiscal years (FY 2003-2004) was used for its average day detennination. Tenaska III has
experienced a significant reduction in water consumption due to operational changes. Tenaska
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
9
DRAFT REPORT
Ill's average day was based on operational estimations provided by Tenaska III. It is anticipated
that Tenaska Ill's operations will increase during the summer months to satisfy electricity
demands; however, it is uncertain the level of peak day water demand that Tenaska III will
actually require. Therefore, Tenaska Ill's peak day demand was based on an average of its last
four fiscal years' peak day consumption. Table A-I in Appendix A shows the individual
customer classes' average and peak-day demands. The table also shows the capacity factors for
the classes as well as their relative percentages of base and extra capacity components of the
system used and useful in providing service to the five customer classes during the test year.
F. Treated Water System Allocation
Distribution Lines
Since the entire treated water transmission and distribution system is not allocable to all of the
five customer classes, system cost allocation percentages of the distribution system not common
to all are detennined separately. All lines larger than 24 inches in diameter are assumed to be
common to all treated water customers.
Hydrants
Fire protection service is not common to all five customer classes of the City's water system.
Therefore, operating and maintenance costs associated with fire service are distributed to the
residential and commercial customers of the City on the basis of their meter equivalency
demands.
Meters
Meter costs are distributed on the basis of equivalent 5/8" meters. Table A-4 in Appendix A
shows the number of equivalent meters in the City's water system. Costs are distributed on the
basis of the number of equivalent meters.
Warehouse
Warehouse costs are allocated to the customer classes based upon the functionalized component
allocation factors as shown on Table A-6 in Appendix A.
Billing and Collecting
Other billing and collecting costs are allocated to all five customer classes based upon the
number of test year bills sent to each customer class.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
10
DRAFT REPORT
Administrative Fees
Administrative fees cover the expenses of the general government in connection with
administering the Utility Fund. Such costs vary by customer class depending on the demands
and requirements placed on the system by each class and are appropriately allocated among
classes based upon the relative total revenue requirements of each class.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
11
DRAFT REPORT
IV. CUSTOMER CLASS DISTRmUTION FACTORS
A. Distribution Factors for Operation and Maintenance Expenses
All system operation and maintenance expenses are functionalized and allocated according to the
allocation units shown in Table A-6 in Appendix A. These functionalized costs should be
distributed to the five customer classes based upon the system base, base/max day, except for
meters, hydrants, billing/collecting and administrative fees. Operating and maintenance expense
for the exceptions are allocated as described in detail in the previous section. Table A-6 in
Appendix A gives the cost distribution units for the total test year operation and maintenance
-
expenses of the City's water utility system allocable to each of the customer classes.
B. Debt Service Cost Distribution
All debt service and other capital expenditures should be allocated to the customers on the basis
of distribution factors for plant responsibility as well as specific usage of the proceeds of each
bond issue.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
12
DRAFT REPORT
v. WATER AND W ASTEW A TER UTILITY FINANCIAL OPERATIONS
A. Determination of Test Year Revenue Requirements
To recognize the City's contract customers' contractual terms, two test year revenue
requirements were developed, one for the contract customers, and one for the retail customers.
Table B-1 in ,Appendix B shows the revenue requirement, as adjusted, for the test year for the
contract customers. Table C-l in Appendix C shows the revenue requirement, as adjusted, for
the test year for the retail customers. The revenue requirement for the contract customers was
developed on the fiscal year ended September 30,2004 actual expenses, adjusted for the increase
--
in electricity costs, while the retail customer revenue requirement was based on the City's FY
2004/2005 budget, adjusted for the increase in electricity costs. Adjustments and
reclassifications to the revenue requirements are as follows:
Raw Water Supply
Since the City budgets both raw water supply and water treatment O&M expenses in
Water Production, it is necessary to separate raw water supply costs into their own
separately-allocable cost section.
'Vater Distribution and Transmission
Water distribution and transmission costs must be reclassified from expense type to cost-
causal categories. Personnel, supplies, contractual, building maintenance, equipment
maintenance, sundry costs, and equipment capital outlay are classified into the three
categories of distribution and transmission (less than 8", 8" to 24", and greater than 24")
based upon the test year water system inch-feet percentages calculated on Table A-2 in
Appendix A. Hydrants/valves and meters/meter boxes remain separate categories for
cost allocation purposes.
Debt Service
The contracts for Campbell Soup and Tenaska III allow for adjustments in known and
measurable changes from the end of the fiscal year to the cost of service determination.
Debt Service is based on the projected principal and interest payments for FY 2004/2005
of the City's current outstanding debt issues.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
13
DRAFT REPORT
B. Allocation of Revenue Requirements to Water and Wastewater
Table B-1 in Appendix B and Table C.1 in Appendix C present the allocation of the total utility
revenue requirement to water and wastewater for applicable treated water contract customers and
retail customers, respectively. Raw water supply, water production, water distribution and
transmission, wastewater maintenance, wastewater treatment, and lift stations costs are directly
assigned to their respective function. Other operations and maintenance costs are allocated
between water and wastewater as follows;
Warehouse
Warehouse costs are allocated SO/50 between water and wastewater under the assumption
~
that it services the water and wastewater system equally.
Billing and Collecting
The billing and collecting function has been allocated SO/50 between water and
wastewater under the assumption that it services the water and wastewater system
equally.
Administrative Fees
Administrative fees are allocated between water and wastewater based upon the ratio of
operations and maintenance expenses assigned to each.
Debt Service
Debt service costs for outstanding debt issues are allocated based upon historical records
of assets, capital improvement plans, and discussions with City staff.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
14
DRAFT REPORT
VI. WATER UTILITY SYSTEM - FINANCIAL DATA
A. Functionalization of Revenue Requirement
Table C-2 in Appendix C details the functionalization of adjusted expense levels into the various
Base-Extra Capacity and Customer Components of the System on the basis of factors previously
discussed in Section II of this report. The components and related expenses are as follows:
Revenue
Requirement
$4,279,920
1,692,737
253,325
$6,225,983
Base
Extra Capacity
Customer Costs
Total Revenue Requirement
B. Allocation of Revenue Requirements to Customer Classes
Based upon the customer class allocation percentages developed in Section III of this report, the
Water Utility's revenue requirement has been allocated to the various customer classes (before
adjusting for contract customers' terms) as follows:
Revenue
Requirement
$1,939,976
1,732,176
1,221,847
1,040,646
291,338
$6,225,983
Residential
Commercial
Campbell Soup
LCWSD
T enaska III
Total'Revenue Requirement
Table C-3 in Appendix C presents a detailed description of the various components of costs
assigned to each customer class.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
15
DRAFT REPORT
vn. REVIEW OF WASTEWATER SYSTEM DATA
A. Review of Historical Wastewater Data
To determine a comparison of wastewater production to water consumption by the City's water
utility customers, available test year data was analyzed for the purpose of this study. From the
test year residential water consumption, water-only (customers with sprinkler meters and septic
tanks) consumption was removed.
Commercial contribution to the wastewater system is estimated from the commercial and retail
industrial water consumption after eliminating the consumption of the water-only accounts.
Since the commercial and industrial water consumption exhibits minimal seasonal variation, it is
assumed 100 percent of the water consumption of these customers is contributed to the
wastewater system.
B. Determination of Customer Classes
The City has a special contract with Sara Lee with respect to wastewater discharge. Sara Lee's
wastewater rate is not based on the total cost of service for the wastewater utility since Sara Lee
contributed up-front capital to reserve a certain capacity in the wastewater treatment plant for
future use. In order to recognize Sara Lee's contract with regard to the cost of service and rate
design study, Sara Lee's wastewater volumes were removed from the rate calculation and their
revenues were recognized as revenue offsets. These adjustments help to prevent an overestimate
of wastewater billing units and an underestimate of revenues.
For the purpose of distributing the total revenue requirement for the system, the wastewater
utility customers are divided into two classes: Residential and Commercial. Residential and
Commercial customers are assumed to discharge wastewater of normal system strength. Any
metered commercial customer that discharges wastewater of strength greater than the criteria set
for residential and commercial customers pays for the added cost of treatment required.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost a/Service Study
May 2005
16
DRAFT REPORT
C. Allocation Factors for Customer Class Revenue Requirements
For cost allocation purposes, conditions corresponding to an average flow of 3.81 MGD with
BOD of 1,567,656Ibs., TSS of 1,560,080 lbs. and ammonia loading of 102,533Ibs. are assumed.
(Table C-6, Appendix C)
City of Paris. Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost o/Service Study
May 2005
17
DRAFT REPORT
VIII. DETERMINATION OF TEST YEAR REVENUE REQUIREMENT
Table C-l in Appendix C shows the revenue requirement, as adjusted for the test year. As
shown in this exhibit, the total revenue requirement for the City's Wastewater Utility is
estimated to be $4,433,774. The wastewater utility revenue requirement is based on the City's
FY 2004/2005 budget, adjusted for the increase in electricity costs.
A. Functionalization of Revenue Requirement
Unlike the water utility system, where separate consideration of extra capacity components of
..
plants and facilities is crucial to equitable allocation and cost distribution among customer
classes, it is not necessary to account for extra capacity in the allocation and distribution of costs
among wastewater utility customers unless there is large reserve capacity in the system.
The City's wastewater operation and maintenance expenses can be functionalized into the
following service cost functions:
a. Warehouse
b. . Billing and Collecting
c. Sewer Maintenance (Wastewater Collection)
d. Wastewater Treatment
e. Lift Station
\Varehouse
Since wastewater warehouse operations serve both treatment and collection, warehouse costs are
functionalized based upon composite allocation factors.
Billing and Collecting
These are costs associated with meter reading, billing, administration and other functions of the
wastewater utility that are independent of quantity and quality of the wastewater contribution by
a customer.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost a/Service Study
May 2005
18
DRAFT REPORT
Sewer Maintenance
Since wastewater flows do not vary significantly except due to infiltration/inflow, which must be
shared by all customers of the system, allocation and distribution of all costs for wastewater
collection may be made among customer classes on the basis of average annual wastewater flow
contribution to the system. All capital costs and operation and maintenance costs associated with
the wastewater collection system should be allocated on the basis of relative percentages of
wastewater flow during the test period.
Wastewater Treatment
Factors affecting wastewater treatment are different and many. Not only the volume of
wastewater contribution by a class of customer is relevant, but also the quality of the wastewater
..
is important. Treatment facilities must be designed to meet both the hydraulic loading and the
biochemical loading. Historically, the City's wastewater utility has measured wastewater
strength in terms of three parameters:
a. BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand)
b. TSS (Total Suspended Solids)
c. Ammonia (NH3)
Costs of operating and maintaining the treatment plant, therefore, must be allocated and
functionalized by these parameters, BOD, TSS and NH3, so that revenues may be collected from
the customer on the basis of not only quantity of wastewater, but also quality of the wastewater.
Lift Station
Lift stations are used to elevate waste along the wastewater collection system or into to the
treatment plant. Since the costs associated with lift stations depend on the quantity of
wastewater and not the quality of wastewater, lift station costs were functionalized to flow.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
19
DRAFT REPORT
Employing the appropriate factors, the test year wastewater revenue requirement has been
allocated to the functions of Flow, BOD, TSS, Ammonia, and Customer Costs. The results of
this allocation are shown on Table C-5 in Appendix C and are summarized as follows:
Revenue
Requirement
$2,275,298
1,217,363
667,248
51,457
222,408
Flow
BOD
TSS
Ammonia
Customer Costs
Total
$4,433,774
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
20
DRAFT REPORT
IX. RATE DESIGN
A. Water Rates
Proposed Water Rate Schedule
RESIDENTIAL CLASS
Meter Size (Inches) Base Cost Excess of Base
(Cubic Foot) (per CCF)
5/8 and 3/4 $8.00 for first 200 $2.70 for each add. 100
1 and larger $39.00 for first 1,000 $2.70 for each add. 100
COMMERCIAL CLASS
Meter Size (Inches) Base Cost Excess of Base
(Cubic Foot) (Per CCF)
5/8 and 3/4 $9.75 for first 200 $2.70 for each add. 100
1 and 2 $39.00 for first 1,000 $2.21 for each add. 100
Larger than 2 $140.00 for first 3,000 $2.21 for each add. 100
4 $2,300 for first 100,000 $2.21 for each add. 100
6 $3,450 for first 150,000 $2.21 for each add. 100
8 and larger $4,600 for first 200,000 $2.21 for each add. 100
B. Analysis of Campbell Soup Company Contract
Based on the Campbell Soup's contract and estimated volumes, Campbell Soup will provide
$1,107,436 in revenue, as shown in Table B-3 in Appendix B.
C. Analysis of Lamar County Water Supply District Contract
Under the current contractual agreement with LCWSD, it is estimated that the City of Paris will
recover $705,534 from LCWSD water purchases through the City's transmission system. Due to
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost o/Service Study
May 2005
21
DRAFT REPOR T
the unpredictability of LCWSD's water purchases through the City's distribution system,
estimated water distribution revenues were not determined, however, a rate is provided based on
average purchases through the distribution system over the last four fiscal years. Estimated
LCWSD revenues are shown in Table B-3 in Appendix B.
D. Analysis of Tenaska III Contract
Based on a two-part rate consisting of a demand charge and a volumetric rate and estimated
volumes, Tenaska III will provide $275,645 in revenue as shown in Table B-3 in Appendix B.
E. LamarPowerPartnen
Per the contractual terms with Lamar Power Partners, it is estimated that Lamar Power Partners
will provide $230,688 in revenue from raw water purchases to the City as shown in Table B-3 in
Appendix B.
F. Wastewater Rates
Proposed Wastewater Rate Schedule
RESIDENTIAL CLASS
Meter Size (Inches) Base Cost Excess of Base
(Cubic Foot) (Per CCF)
5/8 and 3/4 $9.00 for first 200 $3.64 for each add. 100
1 and larger $42.00 for first 1,000 $3.64 for each add. 100
COMMERCIAL CLASS
Meter Size (Inches) Base Cost Excess of Base
(Cubic Foot) (Per CCF)
5/8 and 3/4 $12.00 for first 200 $3.80 for each add. 100
1 and 2 $42.00 for first 1,000 $3.80 for each add. 100
Larger than 2 $84.00 for first 2,000 $3.80 for each add. 100
City of Paris. Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
22
DRAFT REPORT
Excess Strength Charge
BOD $0.78/lb above 250 mg/l
TSS $0.43/lb above 250 mg/l
NH3 $0.50/lb above 30 mg/l
The City implemented R.W. Beck's recommendation of billing Residential wastewater
customers on a flat winter average. The flat winter average assumes that a residential customer's
monthly wastewater volumes on average will reflect the winter average, that is, some months the
residential customer will contribute more to the wastewater system and some months will
contribute less. Commercial and industrial customers should continue to be billed on the basis of
100 percent of the actual metered water consumption except those customers whose wastewater
is metered. The latter should be billed for 100 percent of the metered wastewater.
Unit charges for BOD, TSS and ammonia are computed so that individual customers that exceed
the limits adopted on the basis of domestic wastewater can be charged for excess strength
according to the unit charges in the rate schedule on Table C-6 in Appendix C.
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
May 2005
23
TABLE A.1
CITY OF PARIS
WATER UTILITY
CUSTOMER USE AND CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS
BASE-EXTRA CAPACITY METHOD
CUSTOMER CLASS
AVERAGE DAY
CAPACITY TOTAL
FACTOR CAPACITY
EXTRA CAPACITY
(OOO's
GALLONS)
%
(OOO's
PEAK DAY % PEAK DAY GALLONS)
%
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
CAMPBELL'S SOUP
TENASKA III
LAMAR COUNTY
TOTAL SYSTEM
2,404
2,673
2,416
335
...
2,483
10,312
23.32%
25.93%
23.43%
3.24%
24.08%
100.00%
-' .~-......
,'~ --
"-'
-~-----
--- ,
./"----
/
/
/
157%
134%
248%
557%
175%
190%'~,.
. / ',,'
. ,;
. '-. ,/;' '-'
, ..'
.,'....
><~~>,.,
.....~ .............".
','
Page 1 of!
3,7~6\ 1,382
3,593'" " 920
,.' ", \
,?,QOO ,.' 3,584
i/' 1,8p5, 1,530
" 4,354', 1,871
'19,598 . \,/9,286
.: ,", \\
14.88%
9.90%
38.59%
16.48%
20.15%
100.00%
TABLE A-2
CITY OF PARIS
WATER UTILITY
WATER AND W ASTEW ATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
TREATED WATER DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION LINES
SIZE INCHES LENGTH FEET INCH-FEET PERCENT CLASS
0.75
1.00
1.50
2.00 154,025 308,050
3.00 806 2,418 . ,
4.00 87,203 348,812
6.00 448,752 2,692,512
~
,.:\
SUBTOTAL 690,786 3,351,,7,92 '. 33.65% "',>'<8"
/
. . '.
. . ,
8.00 184,058 1472 464 ,<',
, , ....
10.00 78,468 784,6'80>/ ',.
12.00 129,149 1,549,788 ....
14.00 15,280 ",,- 9 ' ,
;', "" 213, 20
. ..........,~...~
16.00 14,37~/ i '..,'73Q,000
\ , ,I <i 00,992 ~
18.00 5,944
20.00 32,120 ',.,-1,.' 642,400
,.---.....
24.00 .;"'29,419 }06,056
I;'
SUBTOTAL 488,~13-..:.--_<'-' 5,706,300 57.29% 8" - 24"
,,/ ---,'
30.00:=::::--, 15,955" 478,650
,'II ". . 12,~~r'
33.00 418,209
.36.00 127 4,572
"
SUBTOTAL ' , 28,755 901,431 9.05% >24"
\
, " . ,
~ \ / "
. , \/ ,J
TOTAL ' ,; 1,208,354 9,959,523 100%
.'
Page 1 of 1
TABLE A.3
CITY OF PARIS
WATER UTILITY
TREATED WATER LOSS ALLOCATION
TREATED WATER SOLD
VIA VIA
TRANSMISSION DISTRIBUTION
CUSTOMER CLASS (Cu ft.) (Cu ft.)
TOTAL
TOTAL TREATED
WATER ALLOCATION
INCLUDING LOSS
RESIDENTIAL
74,827,970
PERCENT LOSS (Cu ft.) (Cu ft.) PERCENT
18.17% 42,496,053 117,324,023 23.32%
19.81% 48,899,470 130,456,016 25.93%
/1/ .\\\....~
.- \,)
28.63% .' 117,904,648 23.43%
, ,
, '\ ,
/,/ ' '.
3.96% 16,322,395 3.24%
,~
/', , - /i
/29.43% 121)68,746 24.08%
COMMERCIAL
81,556,546
CAMPBELL SOUP
117,904,648
TENASKA III
..
16,322,395
L~ COUNTY WSD
115,840,353
5,328,393
TOTAL SYSTEM
250,067,396
161,712,909." < 411,780,305 91,395,523 503,175,828 100.00%
./
,/ ,'\ \
PERCENT
49.70%
32.14%
(
18.16%
100.00%
''',
\...............:.....~.~..
~'. ".
\
\. /,'./~.~... ~""""'~vr"
'. "
///1' '......
'~'-"''''''
, '---'-
,-----_.--=--:~~'. . :
,.--'-"'~..
" ,t'
;'
,:
Page 1 of 1
TABLE A.4
CITY OF PARIS
WATER UTILITY
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
EQUIVALENT METERS BY CUSTOMER CLASS
3/4" or
CUSTOMER CLASS less 1" 11/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 18" TOTAL
RESIDENTIAL
NUMBER 8,847 34 32 7 0 0 8,920
EQUIVALENTS 8,847 85 160 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,146
COMMERCIAL
NUMBER 1,148 133 181 147 12 12 1 1 0 1,634
EQUIVALENTS 1,148 333 904 1,175 196 319 56 85 0 0 4,215
CAMPBELL SOUP
NUMBER 2 2
EQUIVALENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 ./0. 0 0 957 957
-
. ,
'. \
'.
TENASKA III
NUMBER 1 ,1. - 3
EQUIVALENTS 0 0 0 0 0 " 28 ~ 0 0 0 113
"
LAMAR COUNTY WSD . -
NUMBER 1',/'\--, 1 2 1 5
EQUIVALENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 130 0 300
-
TOTAL SYSTEM .... .......,
NUMBER 9,995 168 213 154'-<::' 12 14 / 2 4 1 2 10,S64
EQUIVALENTS 9,995 417 1,064 ~ 1,230 195>,___ 316 56 340 130 957 14,731
./ ...., ,~
"
,~------
/.~'---~~~'~""\
',,\ '
" '\
. \\.
I
; !
I'
\ \~,.
I
I
'.
\,,",/
Page 1 of 1
TABLE A.5
CITY OF PARIS
W ASTEW A TER UTILITY
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
EQUIVALENT METERS BY CUSTOMER CLASS
CUSTOMER CLASS
3/4" or
less 1" 11/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 18" TOTAL
RESIDENTIAL
NUMBER
EQUIVALENTS
COMMERCIAL
NUMBER
EQUIVALENTS
CAMPBELL SOUP
NUMBER
EQUIVALENTS
TOTAL SYSTEM
NUMBER
EQUIVALENTS
8,539 33 31 7 0 0 8,609
8,539 82 154 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,828
1,008 117
1,008 292
159 129
794 1,032
10
280
11
172
1 1
49 75
~
o
1,435
o 3,702
o
1
598
1
598
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
,
,
/
9,547 149
9,547 374
" ,i
11'/ 10 1 ./1
172: 280"" 49 75
../ \ '\ I
\ ../
1 10,045
598 13,128
190 136
948 1,085
o
o
'"
1'........ '........,
\ ...... .....,.
...'..,.-:...............~.
'......... r
/--....
\ I
,
,
"j
/---:::=:,', ,:
",------
,/ .~- -.---~~. ".
i :
/
I
j
, /
,~'
Page 1 of 1
TABLE A.6
CITY OF PARIS
WATER UTILITY
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
CUSTOMER CLASS ALLOCATION UNITS
Item Total Residential Commercial Campbell Soup T enaska III LCWSD
O&M Expenses
Supply 10,312 2,404 2,673 2,416 335 2,483
Treatment
Base 10,312 2,404 2,673 2,416 335 2,483
Max Day 9,286 1,382 920 3,584 1,530 1,871
Trans. & Dist.
Dist. < 8"
Base 5,078 2,404 2,673 \ 0 0 0
Max Day 2,301 1,382 920 ' , 0 0 0
"
Trans. 8" to 24" \,
, i ,\
Base 5,078 2,404 2673 0\ / 0 0
" , ....j
Max Day 2,301 1,382 920 0' " 0 0
. ,/
,
Trans. > 24" , r' ./
Base 10,312 2 404/ I', \, 2 673' . 2,416 335 2,483
, ~ . , ,. " \
Max Day 9,286 1,382 ' \J 920 "J 3,584 1,530 1,871
/
Meters 14,731 9,146 4,21.5 957 113 300
Hydrants 13,361 ...... 9,146 4,215 0 0 0
.. ......
Warehouse 10,312 " '.~2,404 2,673.;,/ 2,416 335 2,483
Billing & Collecting -', '. " '...... ' ,- 24 36 60
126,766 / '" 107,037...... "" 19,609'
... , /~.
Franchise Fee Allocated based on'revenue requireliienC
'., \ 1";/1 /,l
, "../ /1
...-.....~ ' I
,
,,-~. ' '
Debt Service , ' '-',
. /
Supply / 10,312 2,404 / 2,673 2,416 335 2,483
, {
Treatment ,.' /~:=---:..---./~;:'~'
Base 10,312 ---2,404 2,673 2,416 335 2,483
Max Day .,-.---.......... 9,286 1,382 920 3,584 1,530 1,871
Dist. < 8" .,.//.....---,.~:'\, ' , ~,
\. /[./
,. , - I
Base ' ,. 5,07~ / 2,404 2,673 0 0 0
Max Day..-' 2,301 1,382 920 0 0 0
Trans, 8" to 24"
Base 5,078 2,404 2,673 0 0 0
Max Day 2,301 1,382 920 0 0 0
Trans, > 24"
Base 10,312 2,404 2,673 2,416 335 2,483
Max Day 9,286 1,382 920 3,584 1,530 1,871
Billing & Collection 126,766 107,037 19,609 24 36 60
Page 1 of I
TABLE B-1
CI11' OF PARIS
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
IT 2004 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 2004 Actual!
Alloc.1ted to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Page 1 of9
TABLE B-1
CITY OF PARIS
WATER Al'lD W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2004 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 2004 Actua/s
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Billing & Collection
Personnel Cosl
Salaries & Wages S 146,994 123,497 123,497
Social Security 19,895 9,948 9,948
TMRS & Pension 30,/75 15,088 15,088
Employee Hospita1izations Ins 47,714 23,857 23,857
Worker's Compensation Ins 5,045 2,523 2,523
Unemployment Compensation
Overtime
Stability Pay 4,677 2,339 2,339
SUBTOTAL S 354,501 177,251 177,251
~
Office Supplies S 35,346 11,673, S 17,673
Postage 45,/07 ' , '. \ 22,553
" ~2,553,\ \,
Wearing Apparel 2.266 ,/ < 1,133 '''-' 1,133
Motor Vehicles - Gasoline 2,906 " '1,453 1,453
Motor Vehicles - Oil & Lubricant - 97 . \ '49 49
Motor Vehicles - Tires 573 '. 281" , 287
Motor Vehicles. Batteries ,'d6 28 \, r,28
Laundry Cleaning Etc /\ :.. i
\~/ /
Minor Appartus 1,736' 868 ';, ,/ 868
Furniture & Fixtures. Minor /
SUBTOTAL ~ 88,087 44,043 S 44,043
~ I//~~;
"
Communications - Telephone , ,2,484 1,242 1,242
Car Allowance ' 8,400 4,200 4,200
Insurance & Bonds 4,912 " 2,456 2,456
,~,
Travel Expenses ('.'''''~''' 510"/ 255 255
wtilities . Electricity \ ,..........~....., 4,337/ 2,168 2,168
" '
Credit Card Service Fee \ > ". 833 417 417
,
Utilities - Water and Gas , , '. /,363 682 682
Training. Tuition, Etc, ' \ /1//
Consultants '. './' ,/ 29,599 14,799 14,799
"
/...--....... ,
SUBTOTAL i ..-~~ S 52,439 26,220 26,220
,
Maintenance. Buildings /
(
Buildings & Grounds '--- /",-. S 9,843 4,921 4,921
--./ '
_..._--.... /J
--""J
SUBTOTAL .------.- 9,843 4,921 4,921
/<>----~, .
~/'
" , \
Machine~ Tools Equipment , S 1,325 662 662
\
Instrumen.!s Etc, Radio Maint 3/8 159 159
Malar Vehicles '. ,\, 1,493 747 747
Electronic Data Processing 16,469 8,234 8,234
Maintenance Agreement' \
Tire Repair ' , , "
SUBTOTAL 19,605 9,802 9,802
Sundry Charges
Auditing S 3,000 1,500 1,500
Safekeeping Fees
Water Purchases. Annexed Areas 18,603 9,301 9,301
SUBTOTAL S 2/,603 10,801 10,801
Buildings Structures
Buildings S
SUBTOTAL S
Page 2 or9
TABLEB.1
CITY OF PARIS
WATER Al'm W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2004 ACTUALS
Account Description
~
Furniture & Fixtures
~hinery- Tools-Equipment
Motor Vehicles
Communication System
Miscellaneous
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL BILLING & COLLECTION
W Bter Production
Personnel Costs
Salaries & Wages
Social Security
TMRS & Pension
Employee Hospitalization Ins
W orke(s Compensation Ins
Unemployment Compensation
Overtime
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL
~
Office Supplies
Postage
Food
Wearing Apparel
Motor Vehides - Gasoline
Motor Vehicles - Oil & Lubricant
Motor Vebicles - Tires
Motor Vehicles - Batteries
Minor Apparatus
Laundry Cleaning Etc
,Chemical Medical Etc
Mechanical
Botanical Seeds Etc
Other Supplies
Photographic Supplies
Furniture & Fixtures. Minor
/<---:::::"..
SUBTOTAL / .
,//
/ /
~/\
~, "
" \
Communications: Telephone
Car Allowance " \
Insurance & Bonds \, /
Court Cost. Special Servic6 Fees /i
. '\ I '
Travel Expenses '... './ /
Publications '
Utilities. Electricity
Freight & Express
Miscellaneous
Associations
Utilities. Water & Gas
Training. Tuition
Building Rental & Maintenance
Testing. Analysis
Consultants
SUBTOTAL
,. '.........
,'-, ""
, "<:::>'"
"J/
"-""-..
,../ "'-",
/
.- "
. /'
" I J
L--....._ ~.../
...------.:..~ ,:
.' -......-.
, \
~ \
Page 3 or9
FY 2004 Actuals
Allocated to
Water
s
546,078
273,039
s
496, 146 4~6, 1;46
40,364 . 40,364 '
61,J10 i" 61,310 -
8J,474//\83,474
24,m // 24,224
'-
..' "\ '4O '
, ,
", "
'.J
26,283 \
5,205
26,28J
i 5,205
1,/ '~,
r
7J7,006
, \
737,006
/\....)
,-.
/ J
\) I
6,48J
4,061
Jj9 J'/
7,425' /,/
5,782 /
8J7
""_ ',/ : 897
60
8,J90
2,610
296,925
6,483
4,061
159
7,425
5,782
857
897
60
8,390
2,610
296,925
s
176 176
J40 340
JJ4,J 64 334,164
8,95J 8,953
J5,280 35,280
5,426 5,426
l,02J 1,023
54,JJ6 54,136
28 28
18,940 18,940
2,620 2,620
2,821 2,821
10,J70 10,370
49,011 49,011
188,607 188,607
s
Allocated to
Wastewater
273,039
~,
, \, /'
TABLE B-1
cm OF PARIS
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2004 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 2004 A ctua/s
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Maintenance - Buildings
Buildings & Grounds
Bridges & Culverts
Filter Beds & Valves
Sidewalks & Curbs
Stonn Sewers
Street & Alley Repairs
Manholes Lampholes Etc
Plant Towers Etc
Meters & Meter Boxes
Service Lines
Hydrants & Valves
Other - Sludge Removal
Screening.Landfill Fees
Main Repair - 33'line
S 9,946 9,946
7,/32 7,132
30 30
2,000 2,000
/J,063 13,063
3,100 3,100
850 850
2,595 2,595
SUBTOTAL
S 38,7J5 38,!1~
/'.. ".
,.. / '.. -',
S 210 S 210 S
22,786 ,/ /'\ 22.786
, I
1,569 '/ 1,569
2,280 \ 2,280'\
"- \
745 \ 745
.' 32,380 "J 32,380
.. 943- 943
..
/ d21 221
.. ,
~'
i .'
S . 61,135 S 61,135
SUBTOTAL
Maintenance. Equipment
Furniture & Fixtures
Machinery Tools Equipment
Instruments Etc - Radio Maint
Motor Vehicles
Lease & Rental. Equipment
Pumps & MotOrl
Electronic Data Processing
Maintenance Agreement
Tire Repair
s
r,
I I
\. ,'/
50'/ s'
I
11,453
1,304
50
11,453
1,364
Sundry Charges
Judgements Damages Etc
Auditing
Medical Expenses
-'.
Buildings Structures
,Buildings
,"'-....."
".-,
(.....,.........".
, .,..... ".
\ ',...._~::-',',
\. I
,fl/,", .......~_
, / / S'" ,/12,867
, ,Ii
SliBTOTAL
12,867
~'
.. ,/', S
v
SL'BTOTAL
----... r,'....'
,..-----::'::'. ,i
.I '.'
S
~ .-----.....
Furniture & Fixtures>...-.........>.,
Machinery-Tools.Equipment ','
Instruments &,Apparatus
Motor V~~cles
Communi~ation System
Miscellaneous \
,
Su'BTOTAL
; ~
S
2,413
2,413
2,423
2,423
\
\/
TOTAL WATERPRODl:CTIO:O;
S 1,374,918 S 1,374,918
Raw Water Supply
Utilities - Electricity
Special Project. Lake Crook Dam
Operation & Maintenance. Pat Mayes
Water Storage Rights
S
569,984
22,512
569,984
22,512
TOTAL RAW WATER SUPPLY
s
592,495 S 592,495
Page 4 of9
TABLE B-1
OTY OF PARIS
WATER A,'l1) W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2004 ACTUALS
Account Description
Allocated to
Wastewater
FY 2004 Actua/s
Allocated to
Water
Water Transmission. Distribution
Distribution <8'
Transmission 8' to 24'
Transmission >24'
Meters and Meter Boxes
Hydrants and Valves
TOTAL WATER TRA. 'is:'tllSSION . DISTRIBUTION
Sewer Maintenance
Personnel Cost
Salaries & Wages
Social Security
TMRS & Pension
Employee Hospitalization Ins
Worker's Compensation Ins
t:nemployrnent Compensation
Overtime
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL
~
Office Supplies
Postage
Food
Wearing Apparel
Motor Vehicles. Gasoline
Motor Vehicles. Oil & Lubricant
Motor Vehicles. Tires
Motor Vehicles. Batteries
Laundry Cleaning Etc
Chemical Medical Etc
Photographic Supplies
SUBTOTAL:
~ ~-r.f'\.
Communications. Telephone -
Insurance & Bonds
Court Costs . Speci~Service Fees
Travel Expenses//.....--.... "',
, / '.
Utilities. Electricity
Freight & Expr~ss
Miscellaneolis \
Associations '.,. ',\
Utilities. Water &'Gas
\
Training. Tuition " \
, .\\,
SUBTOTAL:
Maintenance. Buildings
Buildings & Grounds
Sanitary Sewer
Street & Alley Repairs
Manholes Lampholes Etc
Service Lines
Service Force Main
Bridges & Culverts
SUBTOTAL
'.........
,.....,..-.......,..
.. ................'..,...
",- "
/
\
,\
,\
-- .
/ ......-". ..,
,.' I'"~
\" ,
, 'vI' "
/
(
,
~----..,-,'
,..- -----'
~,
PageS of 9
$ 330,724 330,724
57J,2J8 571,218
90,236 90,236
43,202 43,202
7,325 7,325
$ 1,042,705 S 1,042,705
s
J90,505
J6,436
24,278
38,394
6,729
22.295 '
2,055 '.
. '\- \ ~\
I \ ~,
$ ,// 300,693"
, I
./
;'
/'$\
i \
,/ ./
859,
\
,I 283,,,,
': 379
. 3,743
J4,158
376 ",/
2,J 59 /
, "" 449
",'./ 38
I .' 4,960
/"':
'.' /
$ 27,406
3,/55
4,566
3,J65
649
355
J,590
J,365
$ 14,846
S 435
J9,858
46,484
750
3.284
3,217
74,038
" .I
190,505
16,436
24,278
38,394
'~, 6,729
'. 22,295
\ 2,055
.-. .
"
\ " ' ,
S /300,693
',I
859
283
379
3,743
14,158
376
2,159
449
38
4,960
27,406
3,155
4,566
3,165
649
355
1,590
1,365
14,846
435
19,858
46,484
750
3,284
3,227
74,038
TABLE B-1
OTY OF PARIS
WATER AND W ASTEW ATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
IT 2004 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 2004 Actua/s
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Maintenance - Equipment
Furniture & Fixtures
Machinery Tools Equipment
Instruments Etc - Radio Maint
Motor Vehides
Lease & Rental Equipment
Electronic Data Processing
Tire Repair
SundlY Charges
Judgments Damages Etc
Auditing
Medical Expenses
S
108 108
17,687 17,687
J,J21 1,121
19,731 19,731
l.238 1,238
156 156
258 258
40,299 40,299
1,000 1,000
2,000 2,000
606 606
3,606 /~, 3,606
S
SUBTOTAL
S
SliBTOTAL:
S
Buildings - Structures
Sanitary Sewer
Manholes Lampholes Etc
Service Lines
Sewer Mains
S
$//
," \
,.' /" '.
/;
/ I
/
7,183\,\.
" .
"$
\
'\'. '\.
, \
" '-
7,183
.\ \
SUBTOTAL
S7,~83, $'
$ \ ,7,183
'. \/ .
~
Machinery-Tools-Equipment
Motor Vehides
,.-1
./ ,/
, "
S ,I
'S"
J S , ,"_. .,
SUBTOTAL:
S
Force Account Proiect
Public Works Miscellaneous I & I
...
SUBTOTAL:
"
~..... .. ......"
....', S
\ ........................
............... .....".
" \, it" .,...........
'. " /1/1'
'./ I .I
.' /$
-"
. "
.... " -
)./
,I ,
j
-~
,TOTAL SEWER MAI.'iTENANCE," .';>-.:
. /
//
I,
\ I' S
468,071
468,071
., ,
, ,
,J ../
Wastewater Treatment
---'""'- /....
-........
'/ /
PersoMel Cost <,
Salaries & Wages/ :::=:-:" \. \\ 653,258 653,258
Social Security,' ...- "" '" , ,--. 52,743 52,743
./ /
. / ' , ' 'v' '
TMRS & Pension ' " 79,582 79,582
Employee H9Sp[talization Ins /' / ll9.196 119,196
Worker's Compensation Ins 18,575 18,575
Unemployment Compensation 314 314
Overtime , ' 30,806 30,806
Stability Pay \ " 5,391 5,391
\ /
'. \vl
SUBTOTAL S 959,864 959,864
~
Office Supplies 4,081 4,081
Postage 656 656
Food 270 270
Wearing Apparel 10,455 10,455
Motor Vehides . Gasoline 5,938 5,938
Motor Vehides - Oil & Lubricant 223 223
Motor Vehicles - Tires 898 898
Motor Vehicles. Batteries 120 120
Minor Apparatus 15,293 15,293
Laundry Cleaning Etc 1,056 1,056
Chemical Medical Etc 163,922 163,922
Mechanical 1,679 1,679
Botanical Seeds Etc
Other Supplies 1,528 1,528
Photographic Supplies 512 512
SUBTOTAL S 206,629 206,629
Page 6 or9
TABLE B.)
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2004 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 2004 Actuals
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
~
Communications - T elephnne
Insurance & Bonds
Court Cost. Special Smice Fees
Travel Expenses
Publications
Utilities - Electricity
Freight & Express
Miscellanenus
Associations
Utilities. Water & Gas
Training. Tuition
Testing - Analysis
Contractual
s
2,484
13.337
2,484
13.337
/,715
697
292,385
/J7
1.715
697
292,385
117
SUBTOTAL:
2,349
5,0/0
2,474
/8.669
2,500
36,390
378,129
2,349
5,010
2.474
18.669
2.500
36,390
378,129
s
Maintenance - Buildings
Buildings & Grounds
Bridges & Culverts
Filter Beds & Valves
Sidewalks & Curbs
Street & Alley Repairs
Manholes Lampholes Etc
Meters & Meter Boxes
Service Lines
Hydrants & Valves
Other - Sludge Removal
Screening. Landfill Fees
S 14.568
/
,
I
s
14.568
3,72/
3,721
3,9/5 \,
\
3,915
/\ '..
I 105-'
4/8
/ 4,70/
/'., 5,537,
:" ".~--'
SUBTOTAL
s
32,964 S r,
32.964
....~-'
.,
I' '"
,~ ............
, '",,, S
'\ ................,
'. ') '" 74.259
,\ /// "" 'V 7,740
'. /',/ ,. '/2,080
'11/ ~. 350
, /,8/7
\, 48,347
/80
400
I
'./ .'
Maintenance . EQ~ipment
Furniture & Fixtures
Machinery Tools Equipment
Instruments Etc. Radio Maint
Motor Vehicles
Miscellaneous Repair
Lease & Rental - Equipment
Pumps & Motors
Electronic Data Processing
Maintenance Agreement
Tire Repair
/60'./ S
160
74.259
7.740
2,080
350
1.817
48.347
180
400
'/
~.~
/~-----..........
SUBTOTAL: ,/ ,/.----.,. '-,
/ ..I '\, \,
SUBTOTAL
S /J5,333 135,333
S /0,000 10,000
570 570
S /0,570 10.570
S 2/,395 21.395
20,762 20,762
/2,573 12.573
II 11
S 54,74/ 54,741
S 1,778,229 S S 1,778,229
Sundry Charges \ "
Auditing!.,,' __...\
ludgemen~ Damages, Etc, \ \
Medical Expenses \.....\ ! ;
SUBTOTAL: '..':\ ;' /
". \ //
~ '.\/'/
Machinery- Tools-Equipment'/ /"
Instruments & Apparatus '~
Motor Vehicles
Communication System
Buildings
Total Wastewater Treatment
Page 7 of9
TABLE B.1
CITY OF PARIS
W A TIR AND W ASTIW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2004 ACfUALS
Account Description
FY 2004 Ac/uals
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Lm Station
Personnel Cost
Salaries &: Wages
Social Security
TMRS &: Pension
Employee Hospitalization Ins
Worker's Compensation Ins
Unemployment Compensation
Overtime
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL
S 88,0/0 88,010
7,305 7,305
//,092 11,092
/6,359 16,359
2,527 2,527
6,/0/ 6,101
1.380 1,380
S /32,775 132,77S
S 258 /.,
~.. '\ 258
276 / .' \ 276
( .~
934 / , 934
4,545, 4,545
268 268
, "178 \ , )78
..)
/, ". ./ .
/ 3,894--' ,3,894
I
( 7,420 - / 7,420
(
, 'J ::-.
~ .' / ::....:
'.
~
Office Supplies
Postage
Food
Wearing Apparel
Motor Vehicles. Gasoline
Motor Vehicles. Oil &: Lubricant
Motor V chicles. Tires
Motor Vehicles. Batteries
Minor Apparatus
Laundry Cleaning Etc
Chemical Medical Etc
Mechanical
Botanical Seeds Etc
Other Supplies
Photographic Supplies
\ 75
,'.
,.' ..I
(., ,I
75
SUBTOTAL
",
, ."
\,~ ,~,.~~
\.....>...., S /7, 84?,/
\ .........,'......,
If'~/'''''.'::''-./''";'
" // S '>/8492
'.;/,l/ './ I
17,847
~
Communications. Telephone
Car Allowance
Insurance &: Bonds
Travel Expenses
Publications
Utilities. Electricity
Freight &: Express
Miscellaneous
Associations ~,
Utilities. Water &:Gas-----..::::--. \
Training. Tuitibn/' \
Testing. AMlysis
~~f,-. '\\
'.\
8,492
.-."--" ...
.~
I "
,'/
3,927
250
3,927
250
.I.___-......."r,...
"...-----..........-...../ '
m.m
37
/,575
3/5
/,809
122,332
37
1,575
315
1,809
SUBTOTAL
'.
\
S
/38,135
138,735
Maintenance. Buildings' '.: \
Buildings &: Grounds
Bridges &: Culverts
Filter Beds &: Valves
Sidewalks &: Curbs
Storm Sewers
Street &: Alley Repairs
Meters &: Meter Boxes
Hydrants &: Valves
Screening. Landfill Fees
Service Lines
S
4,062
4,062
3,292
3,292
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL:
S 7,354 7,354
S 66 66
4,/25 4,125
/5/ 151
2,445 2,445
/9,137 19,237
67 67
26,09/ 26,091
Page 8 of9
Maintenance. Equipment
Furniture &: Fixtures
Machinery Toots Equipment
Instruments Etc. Radio Maint
Motor Vehicles
Lease &: Rental. Equipment
Pumps &: Motors
Electronic Data Processing
Tire Repair
TABLEB.l
em OF PARIS
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2004 ACTUALS
ACGount Description
FY 2004 Actuals
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Sundrv Charges
Auditing
s
2,000
2,000
SUBTOTAL:
s
2,000
2,000
~
Motor Vehicles
Instruments & Apparatus
Communication System
Buildings
Standpipes & Reservoirs
SUBTOTAL
$
s
TOTAL LIFT STA nON
s
324,801 $
$ 324,802
$ 2~2,~85.
;435,075.:
/ 726,829
./ / 862J~40
734,528
\ 618,029'
\287,381' .I
<'
Debt Service
Debt Service
WIWW Revenue Bonds Series 1994
W IWW Revenue Bonds Series 1997
WIWW Tax and Revenue Bonds Series 1998
W IWW Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 1998
W IWW Revenue Bonds Series 2000
WIWW Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2001
2003 GO Refunding
Debt or Contingency
SUBTOTAL
^,
TOTAL EXPENSES
/"';~"'\
$ 3,927,368 V'2,418,737
.........\./.,,-
(,~.......~:'.-..". ) /'
'..,.'.......... $ 3,917,368/
\. \'" ........... "-..., -
;' .-".......',....... >'"'l
" // "'; .~56,000
\ </~/350,000
$ 1,508,631
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE
2,418,737
1,508,631
Utility Franchise Fee
Administrative Fees
198,683
198,683
151,317
151,317
/ ;'
10,859,373
6,151,614
4,707,759
,/','l'!/
/..!
'J !/
Revenue Offsets
,
-.
- ...'
\>\../::~/"--' ----......../
/~~........,
Sewer Taps and~enslons -".,",.
Water Taps ~dExtensions . \
Misc. Water and Sewer
Sanitation Bilfuig Fee , ,
Service Cbarges'., :'\ ' ,
;
Bulk Water Sales '. ,,'\ ;' ;'
Sewer Dumping Fees .\>, / /
Water and Sewer Charge Offs V//
Water and Sewer Returned Cheelcg'
Water and Sewer Copies (j
Interest Earned
Brush Pickup Fees
Credit Card Convenience Fee
SUBTOTAL:
" ,
$
$
22,961 22,962
20,897 20,897
47,444 23,722 23,722
70,844 35,422 35,422
62,011 62,011
10,991 5,496 5,496
42,520 42,520
(104,203) (52,102) (52,102)
7,200 3,600 3,600
32 16 16
/36,068 68,034 68,034
9,200 4,600 4,600
1,072 1,072
327,036 172,767 154,269
317,036 $ 172,767 154,269
Total Revenue Offsets
Other Revenue Offsets
Lamar Power Partners
Surcharge
Merico Flow
Merico Sewer Charge
Merica Sampling & Auditing
Merica Administrative
Total Other Revenue Offsets
230,688 230,688
137,014 137,014
2,775 2,775
230,8/7 230,817
/5,357 15,357
4,883 4,883
621,5)3 $ 230,688 $ 390,845
Total Revenue Requirement
S 9,910,804 $ 5,748,159 $ 4,162,644
Page 9 of9
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
CUSTOMER CLASS ALLOCATION REVENUE RE UIREMENT WATER-CAFR
Item
O&M Expenses
Supply
Production
Base
Max Day
Trans. & Dis!.
Dis!. < 8"
Base
Max Day
Trans. 8" to 24"
Base
Max Day
Trans. > 24"
Base
Max Day
Meters
Hydrants
Warehouse
Billing & Collecting
Debt Service
Supply
Production
Base
Max Day
Dis!. <8"
Base
Max Day
Trans, 8" to 24"
Base
Max Day . >::=:::-..
Trans. > 24" 1/' '\ "-
Base .:.
'\ \
MaxDayj '.'
Billing & Collection ..
Franchise Fees
Administration Fees
Total Revenue Requirement
Total
592,495
942,932
431,986
198,193
132,532
342,313
228,905
54,076
36,160
43,202
7,325
52,353
273,039
TABLE B-2
Residential Commercial Campbell Soup Tenaska ill LCWSD
138,146
219,853
64,276
93,844
79,573
162,085
137,436
153,608
244,461
42,778
104,348
52,959
180,227 '.,
91,469(
12,608 14,019\\
" -
5,380 './ 3,581
, I '.'
26,823 /./ 12,363
5,0 ~ <: / (2~311
12,207 '\'" 13,57.3
.. /.' '.,
230,545 .. \/42,235
':
. \
"
, ....
\~~"~"
.. ...... ......
,\, '80,966....
, ".......
/ /.............. ......,.../...1
;' i' ....,. ./
\ 186,783 : ,107,689
'-',79,707 Ij' 53,048
347,255/
'j
801,097
~_535,695
/ '
,/' '/~;i:S89 h.iz1
115,41069;293
/ --- ;....,.......
//, ,,..------": ~/ '
"124,776 59,081
. 83,438~ 50,097
, ~ \////
, "
. \ /
14t,794
94,818
1,867
5,754,248
198,683
198,683
6,151,614
33,061
14,108
1,576
1,844,181
63,676
46,325
I
.. /
90,028
90,868
46,117
65,694
33,341
36,761
9,389
289
1,591,156
54,940
51,510
1,954,182 1,697,605
Page 1 of2
138,839
220,956
166,711
19,220 142,683
30,589 227,073
71,183 87,039
12,671 i~) 1,754
13,955\,/:/ 5,959
2,807 ',' 330
/" ;'
-./.
12,268 1,698
52 78
81,372
187,720
206,734
33,226
36,592
o
11,265
25,987
88,272
4,600
15,624
1
13,022
7,286
880
12,608
129
83,625
192,917
107,935
34,146
19,104
1
1,113,904 276,559 928,448
38,461
46,557
1,198,922
9,549 32,058
6,445 47,846
292,554 1,008,351
Base
Max Day
Customer
Base Revenue Offsets
Water Taps and Extensions
Misc. Water & Sewer
Bulk Water Sales
Service Charges
Water and Sewer Charge Offs
Brush Pickup Fees
Interest Earned
Extra-Capacity Revenue Offsets
Water Taps and Extensions
Bulk Water Sales
Interest Earned
Customer Revenue Offsets
Sanitation Billing Fee
Water and Sewer Returned Checks
Water and Sewer Copies
Contract Customer Billing
Lamar Power (Raw Water)
Base
Total Residential Commercial Campbell Soup Tenaska ill LCWSD
4,098,722
1,723,801
329,092
6,151,614
12,523
23,722
3,293
62,011
(52,102)
4,600
40,771
94,818
8,374
2,202
27,263
37,840
35,422
3,600
16
1,072
40,110 .'.
230,688
1,168,396
523,322
262,464
1,954,182
2,920
5,531
768
14,458
(12,148)
1,073
9,506
22,108
1,246
328
4,057
5,630
, .
.' ,.. \
"
28,250 . ,
2,871
13
", 855
''0<:'31,989
I' I' '....... '-
:~. / '~~"
/'/".................~,.,'~:
, I' ';- /
, ,.
I
./
.....---.
/ -----.\
/ / 230,688 . 53,787
230,688 53,787
1/ L-_ ,.....~/
i "--'_ --:..-'-../ "
. //,/ --........-/
'./ I
, Total
3,773~21.6;
1,685,9~1'
288,982
..---,
/ "
Base / /.-----..,.".
Max Day '.\
Cu'stomer
",/ -", \,
, \,
, \
5,748,159
Residential
1,092,501
517,692
230,475
1,840,668
Page 2 of2
1,288,781
350,901
57,924
1,697,605
3,247
6,150
854
16,077
(13,508)
1,193
10,570
24,582
829//,'\
" \
21~/
2,700\
/;.3;747 'oJ
,/ ',/,1 "'\.~;
, /
/ .i
'. \
'- \,
, 6,235
, . ~
, / / 634
.\ 3 ,...
. '189',/
7,060'
'/
59,807
59,807
Commercial
1,204,391
347,154
50,864
1,602,409
758,808
435,128
4,985
1,198,922
2,934
5,559
772
14,531
(12,209)
1,078
9,554
22,219
107,815
183,803
936
774,922
230,647
2,782
292,554 1,008,351
406
770
107
2,012
(1,690)
149
1,323
3,076
3,232 1,380
. \ 850 363
10,521 4,492
14,603\/,~.' 6,235
54,057
54,057
Campbell Soup
682,533
420,525
4,378
1,107,436
, ,.
/' ;'
i
~/
537 101
55 1,0
o 0
16 3
608 114
7,483
7,483
T enaska ill
97,256
177,567
822
275,645
3,016
5,713
793
14,933
(12,547)
1,108
9,818
22,834
1,687
444
5,493
7,624
299
30
o
9
339
55,553
55,553
LCWSD
696,535
223,023"'"
2,443
922,00 I
TABLE B-3
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE MODEL
CONTRACT CUSTOMER BILLING CALCULATIONS
Campbell Soup Company
Campbell's Base and Customer Costs
Total Consumption (CCF)
Volumetric Rate
$
686,910
1,179,046
0.58 Per CeF
$
Campbell's Extra-Capacity Costs
Campbell's Maximum Day Demand
Demand Charge per MGD
$
420,525
6.0 MGD
70,088
$
Campbell's Extra-Capacity Costs
Months
Monthly Demand Charge
$
420,525'\
12//'\\'\
35,044 0/,;
//\'~'"
. I
1,\
$
Total Revenue
s
1,107d36
,~
, "
'. ',\
\ > '\,
\, :' J~ '.
1/ // -'..1
, i
r
'. f/ ,/
.' ................ ". ....~/.. 1/
;..., '-..... " /
''-, "',- ,. /
'..... .....,... ,_/
'; . ""-,/'
,1/ ......,..,........ ,J
;' , /
/
/--"',
./ "--'. "
~,
) ;
!
/
I' ,/
, I
'____ ,.--..1
__----_~/f:
;' ,
----------
,(,----,'>.
I " , ,
\ "
", .....
'\,>'//i/
/ /
(~/~<,
, .'
I I
:--/
"
Page 1 of 5
TABLE B-3
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE MODEL
CONTRACT CUSTOMER BILLING CALCULATIONS
Tenaska III
Tenaska's Base and Customer Costs
Total Consumption (CCF)
Volumetric Rate
Tenaska's Extra-Capacity Costs
T enaska's Maximum Day Demand
Demand Charge per MGD
Tenaska's Extra-Capacity Costs
Months
Monthly Demand Charge
Total Revenue
<
/~----
,'>'---->,
,
'\ /}
\\ / /
\ ./ !
\\ ,/ /
\/
$
98,078
163,224
0.60 Per CCF
, ,
177 567/'\\
, .. ~ ',\
, ''o
/ 12 "'~
/ 1~,797
I' ~/
$
$
177,567
1.865 MGD
95,228
/
'/
i>"
/ ^ \ "....:...,...
,:' / . \ ......'-........~',
../ L \ ..........., '....
, \ ./,/,...,>---.,r,
\, /: jt' "'";. //
',I. ,/ / /,/
" v' j'
, /
~/:.:==:\
." \, \
.'
, /1
, ,
, .-..---.../;-
------- '
--'
\. / I
/ ,
.~//
\, '~
Page 2 of 5
\
, \,/";
$
$
$
\ "\
, "
, \
J/ "\ , i
$//\\' 275,645
/' ,;1 \,-,:
,',/
/r")
TABLEB.3
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND W ASTEW ATER COST OF SERVICE MODEL
CONTRACT CUSTOMER BILLING CALCULATIONS
Lamar County WSD . Transmission
Depreciation
Water Treatment Plant in Place at 10/01/84
Assets Placed in Service After 10/1184
Capital Outlays Since 10/1/84
Total Depreciation
$
92,418
311 ,636
15,520
419,575
$
Bond Interest and Agent Fees (production Related)
W IWW Revenue Bonds Series 1994
WIWW Tax and Revenue Bonds Series 1998
W IWW Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 1998
W IWW Revenue Bonds Series 2000
W IWW Revenue Refunding Bonds Series ~OO 1
2003 GO Refunding
$
954
98,783
203,739/
~ ,'.
.71,2'32\
.'.' '\ \
\15615.\
"" \' '-
. ,
Total Bond Interest and Agent Fees
.$~/'\<}90,313
/
Total Capital Costs
Contractual Amount of Capital Costs
/,>", $ C', 809,888
2l:0%,$ ,,",>170,076
,. . I "-1
Production O&M
Less Lamar Power Offset
Production O&M Applicable to LCWSD
" ',,, /
\
\
\
$
1.?,67:4'13
" 45,326
-1,922,088
LCWSD Test Year Sales
Total System Production
...'......
,-\ :::"~'::''''''''
, ~."',
,,,/ ' , \ ""'-,,""""-........ $
, \ /,/.,'1'".'..':--............../.;
/ // '':> /:
.. ,~/ 906,405,229 Gallons
4,031,243,000 Gallons
'.--'.
,. ./
;'
, ^
\ J)
\.,1 ,
22.5% $ 432,172
6.5% $ 39,146
$ 641,395
10.0% $ 64,139
$ 705,534
$ 0.58 Per CCF
Contractual Amount ofO&M
/
f/'
'.
/ ;-
/,,;-=::::~ J'~}
// ------...
Administrative Charge
" .'
Subtotal
-------...
/<'~'-;;"~
/ '-
'" "\
, \, ,1"/,
i '.).//
Profit
, ,
...,1' '\,
\ :
Revenue Requirement
\\
\
\
\.
..
',.
Volumetric Rate
Total Revenue
$
705,534
Page 3 of 5
TABLEB.3
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE MODEL
CONTRACT CUSTOMER BILLING CALCULATIONS
,/\\
48187'/\\\
, ,/ '"
149,100 '. ~':
117,683"
116~,247
. ^'. 477,443
,. . \ .J
//',<)00,067
" / 25,748
/ / $ ,..... 1,082,474
j<\, i;'>\
$'./>/ 2,011,229
" '\
" \ "
6.5% $ "\')30:730
, ',/ ..-
l/
Lamar County WSD - Distribution
Distribution O&M
Distribution O&M
Less:
Meter & Meter Boxes
Service Lines
Fire Hydrants & Valves
Total Distribution O&M
Debt Service (Distribution-Related)
W /WW Revenue Bonds Series 1994
W/WW Revenue Bonds Series 1997
W/WW Tax and Revenue Bonds Series 1998
W /WW Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 1'998
W /WW Revenue Bonds Series 2000
W/WW Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2001
2003 GO Refunding
Total Debt Service
Subtotal
Administrative Charge
',,-
('........ .............,
'^ '.. ........ "
/ \ \ "",- "'-. $
/ . \)~ $
\ / /-~..r"
. \ I /1 ') ,/
'\ \ />1' 0 00/0 $/
,/ ./ . 1( _'
<'
Subtotal
Profit
Total Applicable Costs
/~..\
, ,/ \
',\,/) $
! '
;. /
LCWSD Distribution Sales
Total System Distribution Sales
I " "
'------- ~--.."-'
,.~'-.______"'~,.' i
I
\, ("
/....--.......
/ ,---..... '-"
Contractual Amount of O&M >/ '\ ,\.
i ,I \, \
.-< <: \\'\
Distribution Rate per CCF \..'\
\. \
. ,
,
\ '
\ //
. ,t' /1
\\ .//
, ,,' I
;- ./
\ /
v
\
'. .
3.2% $
Page 4 of 5
$
1,042,705
$
92,958
3,841
17,150
113,949
$
$
928,755
$
$
'2,141,959
214,196
2,356,155
5,328,393 CCF
164,505,077 CCF
76,317
1.43
TABLEB.3
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE MODEL
CONTRACT CUSTOMER BILLING CALCULATIONS
Lamar Power
O&M Expenses:
Warehouse
Billing & Collecting
Raw Water Production Electricity
O&M - Pat Mayse
Other Raw Water O&M
Water Transmission O&M
Water Transmission Capital Outlay
Water Storage Rights
Spare Parts Cost Directly Related to FP&L Pipeline
O&M Costs Directly Related to FP&L Pipeline
Electricity Costs Directly Related to FP&L Pipeline
Total O&M Expenses
Non-Operating Expenses:
PILOT
Administrative Transfer to General Fund
Working Capital- 30 Days
Total Non-Operating Expenses
Debt:
Debt Service
10% Debt Service Coverage
Total Debt Service
Total Cost of Service
I ,.-
, ,
/ i
Test Year Raw Water Sales (OOO's Gallons) <
1,,,,,/' '\
Raw Water Rate
10% Mark-up
----~
. .".I/.......--...~...
,,/// '\
/
I
,
\,
"
\
\ "
\ \
\ ':
FP &L Raw Water Rate
'\\
\
Total Revenue
,:
I'
i' ,/
;' ;
'.\ //
. \< ,/
,:' ///
,,'
, \,
\>\
Total Raw Water
Cost of Service
$
185,414
75,000
15,000
91,700
60,000
$
427,114
$
,'-
/ \.
,. ,. .
'/"'.,.'"
27,213
58,313 " /
67,425'
152,951
,:'\
$
'J \..
,\ ./,/'~:
',/ /1
. (
, '\
$..." 347,255
'. ;~<-:"34,726
,~,"$\\ 381,98L_~
'.\ /<:/"'~>)
'/
, /
J'
:. ./
I
j
'; ,/ I'
v' "
,,/:=:: $ , "962,045
. \
'\ \.,/~)
. 5,397,872
.:.---_.....,'.j
/ ______ -_/ i
, / ,r -.-../
. >/ / $ - 0,17823 Perl,OOO Gallons
Page50f5
, Lamar Power
Cost of Service
$
40,418
16,349
3,270
19,990
13,079
I"
\
~
\$ 93,107
'<'\
'. \
'.)
'\ \,
$ \,5,932
)2,712
j 14 698
,
$ 33,342
r,
,/// $ 75,698
7,570
$ 83,268
$ 209,716
1,176,682
$ 0.17823 Per 1,000 Gallons
$ 0.01782 Per 1,000 Gallons
$ 0.19605 Per 1,000 Gallons
$ 230,688
TABLE C-1
CITY OF PARIS
WATER A. 'ID W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
2004-2005 BUDGET
Accowll Description
Budget 2004 -
2005
Allocated to
Waler
Allocated to
Wastewaler
Warehoulc
PmoMel Cost
Salaries & Wages S 58,91/ 29,461 29,461
Social Security 4,507 2,254 2,254
TMRS & Pension 6,451 3,226 3,226
Employee Hospitalizations Ins 9,808 4,904 4,904
Worke~1 Compensation Ins 4,246 2,123 2,123
Unemployment Compensation /80 90 90
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL S 84,114 42,057 42,057
~
Office Supplies S 100 50 50
Postage 150 125 125
Wearing Apparel 250 125 " m
Motor Vehicles - Gasoline 400 200' \ 200
Motor Vehicles - Oil & Lubricant 50 25 25
Motor Vehicles. Tires 250 125 125
Lawtdzy Cleaning Etc 50 ' .25, 25
\,
SUBTOTAL S J.350 $ , - 675 675
;' I
I '
~ / ,.
i I
Communications - Telephone S ' / 1,500 1,250 $: 1,250
"
Insurance & Bonds 1,600 1,300 '.' 1,300
Travel ElCpenses -
Utilities. Electricity .. 969 485 485
Utilities. Water and Gas 450 225 225
Training - Tuition
SUBTOTAL S 6,5/9 $ 3,260 3,260
-
Maintenance - Buildings ,-
Buildings & Growtds ,/ I S -"'" 500 250 250
SUBTOTAL 500 250 250
~
F umiture & Fixtures S
MachineI)' T cols Equipment" 50 25 25
Motor Vehicles 400 200 200
Electronic Data Processing 500 250 250
SUBTOTAL S 950 475 475
SwtdrJ Charges
Auditing 200 100 100
SUBTOTAL S 200 100 100
~
Machinery- T cols-Equipment S
Motor Vehicles
SUBTOTAL S
TOTAL WAREHOUSE 93,633 46,817 46,817
Page lof9
TABLE C-1
CITY OF PARIS
WATER All]) W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
1004-2005 BUDGET
Account Description
Budget 2004 .
2005
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Billing &. Colltction
PmoMel Cost
Salaries & Wages 5 233,198 116,599 116,599
Social Security 18,483 9,242 9,242
TMRS & Pension 26,456 13,228 13 ,228
Employet Hospitalizations Ins 44,097 22,049 22,049
W orkefs Compensation Ins 5,055 2,528 2,m
Unemployment Compensation 810 405 405
Overtime
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL J18,099 164,050 164,050
~
Office Supplies 5 35,000 17,500 17,500
Postage 50,000 25,000 25,000
W caring Apparel 2,500 ,1.250" 1,250
Motor V chicles. Gasoline 3,000 '1,500 1,500
Motor Vehicles. Oil & Lubricant 150 \ 75 75
Motor V chicles - Tires 550 '275 275
Motor V chicles - Baneries 75 ( 38 \. 38
\ '
LaundJy Cleaning Etc 50 \ 25 ' 25
Minor Appartus 1,800 \ ' 900 900
Furniture & Fixtures - Minor .
SUBTOTAL 5 93,W 46,563 46,563
~ "
\
Communications. Telephone ' '5 2.500 '. S 1,250 1,250
Car Allowance 8.400 <:: 4,200 4,200
Insurance & Bonds 5.000 2,500 2,500
Travel Expenses
Utilities - Electricity J,728 1,864 1,864
Credit Card Service Fee 825 413 413
Utilities - Water and Gas I.JOO 650 650
Training. Tuition, Etc, '" , - -
Consultants '. " ]5.000 12,500 12,500
SUBTOTAL 46,753 23,376 23,376
~
Maintenance - Buildin2s
Buildings & Grounds 5 5.000 2,500 2,500
SUBTOTAL ..------......,... 5 5,000 2,500 2,500
~
Machine!)' Tools Equipment.. 5.000 2,500 2,500
Instruments Etc. Radio Maint 500 250 250
Motor Vehicles I.500 750 750
Electronic Data Processing 10,500 5,250 5,250
Maint~ce Agreement
SUBTOTAL $ 17,500 8,750 8,750
Sundry Charges
Auditing J,OOO 1,500 1,500
Safekeeping F res
Water Purchases. Annexed Areas 18,000 9,000 9,000
SUBTOTAL $ 2J, 000 10,500 10,500
BuildiniS Structures
Buildings
SUBTOTAL $
Page 2 of9
TABLE C.I
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
2004-2005 BUDGET
AcCOlDlt Description Budget 2004 . Allocated to Allocated to
2005 Water Wastewater
--
Furniture & Fixtures $
MachineI)'. T cols.Equipment
Motor Vehides
Communication System
Miscellaneous
SL'BTOTAL
TOTAL BILLING & COLLECfIO:"i S Sll,477 255,738 255,738
Water Production
Persormel Costs
Salaries & Wages $ 482,754 482,754
Social Security J7,695 37,695 '.
TMRS & Pension 5J,958 53,958 .
Employee Hospitalization Ins 80,9JJ . 80,913
Worker's Compensation Ins 25,m .25,372
Unemployment Compensation 1,710 1,710
Overtime 10,000 . 10,000
Stability Pay
.
-
SUBTOTAL $ 692,402 ~ 692,402
~ .-
Office Supplies -$ . 5,500 5,500
Postage 5,500 5,500
Food 100 100
W wing Apparel 7,000 7,000
Motor Vehides . Gasoline 5,000 5,000
Motor Vehicles. Oil & Lubricant 720 720
Motor Vehides . Tires 1,015 1,015
Motor Vehic1es . Batteries 250 250
Minor Appararus 6,600 6,600
LllDldl)' Cleaning Etc 1.520 2,520
Chemical Medical Etc J67,J45 367,345
Mechanical
Botanical Seeds Etc /00 100
Other Supplies 100 100
Photographic Supplies m 225
Furniture & Fixtures. Minor 550 550
SL'BTOTAL 402,525 402,525
~'---'-"
~ "/',,..-----..
Communications. Telephone S 10,000 10,000
Car Allowance
Insurance & Bonds JJ,082 33,082
Court Cosio Special Service Fees
Travel Expense<\ 2.500 2,500
Publications /70 170
Utilities. Electricity 56,908 56,908
Freight & Express 500 500
Miscellaneous 2/,JOO 21,300
Associations J,OOO 3,000
Utilities. Water & Gas
Training. Tuition 5,000 5,000
Building Rental & Maintenance
Testing. Analysis 12.JJ5 12,335
SUBTOTAL 144,795 144,795
Page J of9
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
2004-200S BUDGET
TABLE C-1
AccolDlt Description
Budget 1004 -
2005
Maintenance. Buildings
Buildings & GrolDlds
Bridges & Culverts
Filter Beds & Valves
Sidewalks & Curbs
Storm Sewe~
Street & Alley Repairs
Manholes Lampholes Etc
Plant Towe~ Etc
Mele~ &: Meier Boxes
Semce Lines
Hydrants & Valves
Other - Sludge Removal
Screening-Landfill Fees
s
10,000
500
11,775
500
150
WOO
500
10,000
8,000
1,000
8,000
SUBTOTAL
Maintenance - Equioment
Furniture & Fixtures
Machinery T oals Equipment
Instruments Etc - Radio Maint
Motor Vehicles
Lease &: Rental- Equipment
Pumps &: Moto~
Electronic Data Processing
Maintenance Agreement
Tire Repair
SUBTOTAL
SlDIdry Charges
Judgements Damages Etc
Auditing
Medical Eiqlen5es
SUBTOTAL
Buildings Structures
Buildings
SUBTOTAL
~
Furniture & Fixtures
Machinery- T oals-Equipment
Instruments & Apparatus ,
Motor Vehicles .. /- -:
Communkati?D System
SUBTOTAL
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
10,000
500
11,775
500
250
44,500
500
20,000
8,000
1,000
8,000
1,451,397 S 1,4S2,397
TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION
Raw Water Supply
Utilities. Electricity
Special Project - Lake Creek Dam
Operation & Maintenance. Pat Mayes
Water Storage Rights
s
599,170
15. 000
75,000
60,000
599,170
15,000
75,000
60,000
TOTAL RAW WATER SUPPLY S 749,170 749,170
Water TransmissioD - Distribution
Distribution <8' S 340,969 340,969
Transmission 8' to 24' 580,487 580,487
Transmission >24" 91,700 91,700
Mete~ and Meier Boxes 25. 000 25,000
Hydrants and Valves 8.000 8,000
TOTAL W ATER TRANS~ISSION - DISTRIBUTIO:'l 1,046,m S 1,046,IS7
Page 4 of9
TABLEC.I
CITY OF PARIS
WATER A.'iD WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STIJDY
2004-2005 BUDGET
Account Description
Budgft 2004 .
1005
Allocaudto
Watet
Allocated to
Wastewatet
Sewer Maintenance
PmoMel Cost
Salaries & Wages 174, J7J 174,173
Social Security /6,383 16,383
TMRS & Pension 1J.451 23,452
Employee Hospitalization Ins 36,701 36,702
Wotke(s Compensation Ins 7.850 7,850
Unemployment Compensation 8/0 810
Overtime 40,000 40,000
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL 199,)70 299,370
~
Office Supplies S 700 700
Postage 100 200
Food 300 300
Wearing Apparel 3,000 , 3,000
Motot Vehieles . Gasoline I5. 000 15,000
Motot Vehieles . Oil & Lubricant /.000 I 1,000
Motot Vehicles. Tires 1.500 : 2,500
"
Motor Vehieles . Batteries 400 \ 400
"
Laundry Cleaning Etc , /00 \. 100
Chemical Medical Etc I 5,000 " , 5,000
Photographic Supplies ! ,/ .
SUBTOTAL: " S 18,100 S' 28,200
/ /~
~
Communications. Telephone S 3,000 3,000
Insurance & Bonds 4.4J0 4,450
Court Costs . Special Service Fees
Travel Eltpenses 400 400
Utilities. Electricity 3,728 3,728
Freight & Eltpress ,
Miscellaneous
Associations 400 400
Utilities. Water & Gas 2.000 2,000
Training. Tuition /.150 1,250
SUBTOTAL: S /5,118 15,228
<.-..---
Maintenance. Buildings ','
Buildings & Grounds S /,000 1,000
Sanitaly Sewer.~=___~ . 20,000 20,000
Street & Alley Repai/, ~" 50,000 lO,OOO
Manholes Lampholes Etc 5,000 l,OOO
Service Lines 5,000 l,OOO
Service Force Main 6,000 6,000
SUBTOTAL 87,000 87,000
Maintenance. Equipment ,
F umiture & Fixtures S /00 100
Machinery Tools Equipment 10.000 20,000
Instruments Etc . Radio Maint /,000 1,000
Motor Vehieles 15,000 ll,OOO
Lease & Rental Equipment /0.000 10,000
Electronic Data Processing /,000 1,000
Tire Repair 200 200
SUBTOTAL 47,300 47,300
Sundty Chams
Judgments Damages Etc /.000 1,000
Auditing 1,000 2,000
Medical Expenses 1,000 2,000
SUBTOTAL: 5,000 l,OOO
Pagel of 9
TABLE C.1
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE Sn'DY
100....2005 Bl'DGET
AeeoWlt Description
Budget 2004 -
2005
Allocated to
Watet
Allocated to
Wastewatet
BuildiniS . Structures
Sanital}' Sewer $
Manholes lampholes Ete
Smiee lines
Sewer Mains
SUBTOTAl $
~
Machinery. T cots-Equipment $
Motor Vehicles
$
SUBTOTAl: S
Force AccoWlt Proiect
Public Works Miscellaneous 1 & I $
SUBTOTAl:
TOT At SEWER MA~"TENA.'1CE 481,098 482,098
Wastewater Treatment
PersoMel Cost "-
Salaries & Wages $ /697,9)1 697,931
Social Security 54,616 , " S4,616
TMRS & Pension 76,8)0, 76,830
Employee Hospitalization Ins - l2O.09) , 120,093
Worker's Compensation Ins ' 21,418 21,418
Unemployment Compensation 2,520 2,S20
Overtime 16,000 16,000
Stability Pay " " - '
. /
" '..
SUBTOTAl .$ ", 989,408 989,408
"""'-" ,~
~
Office Supplies $ 6.000 6,000
Postage 1.550 I,S50
Food 250 250
Wearing Apparel 8.000 8,000
Motot Vehides . Gasoline 6.000 6,000
Motor Vehicles - Oil & lubricant 600 600
Motor Vehicles. Tires 1,420 1,420
Motor Vehides - Ba!leries. 240 240
Minor Apparatus ':-..----:-: 9.500 9,500
laundry Cleaning Etc 1,500 1,500
Chemical Medical Etc 145,000 145,000
Mechanical , 500 SOO
Botanical Seeds Etc 250 250
Other Supplies " 750 750
Photographic SuPplies 500 500
SUBTOTAl $ 182,060 182,060
~
Communications - Telephone S ),000 3,000
Insurance & Bonds 11. 000 11,000
COurl Cost- Special Service Fees
Travel Expenses 2,000 2,000
Publications 400 400
Utilities. Electricity ))5,494 335,494
F~ight & Express 475 475
Miscellaneous 41,205 41,205
Associations 2,500 2,SOO
Utilities. Water & Gas ],200 2,200
Training - Tuition 5,800 5,800
Testing. Analysis 21,045 21,045
SUBTOTAl: $ 425,119 425,119
Page 6 of9
TABLE C-l
CmOFPARIS
WATER A.'iD WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE Sn;DY
2004-2005 BUDGET
Account Description Budget 2004 . Allocated to AlIOCaled to
2005 Water Wastewater
Maintenance. BuildiniS
Buildings & Grounds S 52,000 52,000
Bridges & Culverts 100 100
Filter Beds & Valves 10,000 10,000
Sidewa1ks & Curbs 500 500
Street & Alley Repairs 4,000 4,000
Manholes Larnpholes Etc 250 250
Meters & Meter Boxes 8,000 8,000
Service Lines 1,150 1,250
Hydrants & Valves 500 500
Other. Sludge Removal 5,000 5,000
Screening. Landfill Fees 4,500 4,500
SUBTOTAL S 86,100 86,100
Maintenance. Equipment
Furniture & Fixtures S 750 750
M~hinery Tools Equipment 7J,955 73,955
Instruments Etc. Radio Maint 2,000 . 2,000
Motor Vehicles 2,000 2,000
Miscellaneous Repair 500 500
Lease & Rental - Equipment 2,000 2,000
Pumps & Motors 18,000 r 18,000
Electronic Data Processing 4,500 4,500
Maintenance Agreement " 450 ~ 450
Tire Repair . 150 ' 150
SUBTOTAL: S 104,305 104,305
, \.
Sundzy Charges / ," \
Auditing 'JJ. 000 11,000
Judgements, Damages, Etc.
Medical Expenses 1,000 1,000
SUBTOTAL: , , 12,000 '. $ 12,000
,
~ , , ,
,
~hinery. Tools.Equipment $"'" 40,000 40,000
Instruments & Apparatus " 30,000 30,000
Motor Vehicles
Communication System
Buildings
SUBTOTAL 70,000 70,000
-- -
Total Wl.ltewaterTrutment S 1,868,992 $ 1,868,992
"".-----~..
Lift Station
Personnel Cost
Salaries & Wages S 85,436 85,436
Social Security . 7,JOO 7,300
TMRS & pensiOli . 10,450 10,450
Employee Hospitalization Ins , 14,708 14,708
Worker's Compensation InS .,/ .' 2,841 2,841
Unemployment Compensa~on .' 360 360
Overtime 10,000 10,000
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL S JJJ,095 131,095
~
Office Supplies S 500 500
Postage 250 250
Food
Wearing Apparel 1,000 1,000
Motor Vehicles. Gasoline J.jOO 3,500
Motor Vehicles. Oil & Lubricant 400 400
Motor Vehicles. Tires 600 600
Motor Vehicles. Batteries 150 150
Minor Apparatus 250 250
Laundry Cleaning Elc 200 200
Chemical Medical Etc 15.000 15,000
Mechanical 100 100
Botanical Seeds Elc
Other Supplies 50 SO
Photographic Supplies 100 100
SUBTOTAL 22, JOO 22,100
Page 70f9
TABLE C-l
el1Y OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE SThllY
2004-2005 BUDGET
Account Description
Budget 2004 .
2005
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
~
Communications. Telephone
Car Allowance
Insurance 81; Bonds
Travel Expenses
Publications
Utilities. Electricity
Freight & Express
MisceUaneous
Associations
Utilities. Water & Gas
Training. Tuition
Testing. Analysis
$
8,750
8,750
4,000
500
100
lll,8Jl
150
1.500
JOO
1,750
750
500
4,000
500
\00
111,831
\50
\,500
300
\,750
750
500
SUBTOTAL
JJO,JJJ
130,131
Maintenance - Buildings
Buildings 81; Grounds
Bridges & Culverts
Filter Beds 81; Valves
Sidewalks 81; Curbs
Storm Sewers
Street & Alley Repairs
Meters 81; Meter Boxes
Hydrants 81; Valves
Screening. Landfill Fees
Service Lines
J,OOO
400
3,000
400
500
2,000
.1,000
.5,000 '
.;
, '\
500
2,000
5,000
5,000
SUBTOTAL
$
15,900
S' \5,900
Maintenance. EljJlipment
Furniture 81; Fixtures
Mll:hinery Toots Equipment
Instruments Etc. Radio Maint
Motor Vehicles
Lease 81; Rental. Equipment
Pumps 81; Motors
Electronic Data Processing
Tire Repair
.
1,'.'."':-.,...,,
~'~~" ',-
-""" ,..
250
J,OOO
J,OOO
J,OOO
1,000 '
19,500,'
"100
75
250
3,000
3,000
3,000
\,000
\9,500
\00
75
/"'". '
SUBTOTAL:
$
29,925
29,925
Sund1y Charges
Auditing
$
2,000
2,000
----.
SUBTOTAL:
2.000
2,000
~
Motor Vehicles
Instruments & Apparatus
Communication System
Buildings
Standpipes 81; Reservoirs
SUBTOTAL
$
TOTAL LIFT STATION .
s
JJ1,151
S 331,151
Debt Service
~
W rww Revenue Bonds Series 1994 $ 262,885
W rww System Revenue Bonds Series \997 415,075
wrww Tax and Revenue Bonds Series \998 726,829
W rww Revenue Refunding Bonds Series \998 862,640
W rww Revenue Bonds Series 2000 714,528
W rww Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 200 I 618,029
2003 GO Refunding 287,J82
Debt or Contingency
SUBTOTAL $ J,927,J68 S 2,418,737 S \,508,631
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE S J,927,168 2,418,737 1,so8,631
Utility Franchise Fee 350,000 200,760 \49,240
Administrative F res 750,000 430,200 319,800
TOTAL EXPE;';SES S 11,562,441 6,599,976 4,962,467
Page 8 or9
TABLE C-l
cm OF PARIS
WATER A.'ill WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE Sn:DY
2004-2005 BUDGET
AccolDlt Description Budget 2004 - Allocated to Allocated to
2005 Water Wastewater
Revenue Offsets
Sewer Taps and Extensions S 2l.O00 21,000
Water Taps and Extensions 27.520 27,520
Misc. Water and Sewer J 5. 000 7,500 7,500
Sanitation Billing Fee 70.000 35,000 35,000
Service Charges 65,000 32,500 32,500
Bulk Water Sales 12. 000 12,000
Sewer Dumping Fees 38.850 38,850
Water and Sewer Charge 0fE; (85,000) (42,500) (42,500)
Water and Sewer Returned Checks 5,720 2,860 2,860
Water and Sewer Copies 50 25 25
Interest Eamed JJO.OOO 65,000 65,000
Brush Pickup Fees 5,000 2,500 2,500
Credit Card Convenience Fee 900 900
SUBTOTAL: 306,040 143,305 162,735
Total Reveoue Offsets 306,040 143,305 . S 162,735
I
Other Revenue Offsets
Lamar Power Partners 230,688 $ 230,688
Surcharges m.J27 \12,127
Sara Lee Flow Charge 2,775 2,715
Sara Lee Sewer Charge 230,817 230,817
Sara Lee Sampling & Auditing J 5,357 15,357.
Sara Lee Administrative . 4,883 . 4,883
Total Other Reveoue Offsets S / ,596,646 .~ 230,688 365,958
~ "
Total Reveoue Requiremeot i ,'10,659/57 . S 6,225,983 5 4,433,774
,..-'.--
" ......--_..-...,,, -"".
Page 9 of9
PagelofS
Page 2 ofS
Page3 00
TABLE C-2
CITY OF PARIS
WATER Al\iI) W ASTEW ATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
BASE-EXTRA CAPACITY METHOD - BUDGET
Extra Capacity Extra-Cap Customer Customer
Account Descri tion Bud et Base % Base Allocation % Allocation Costs % Costs
Maintenance - Buildings
Buildings & Grounds 10,000 59.93% 5,993 40.07% 4,007 0.00%
Bridges & Culverts 500 59.93% 300 40.07% 200 0.00%
Filter Beds & Valves l1,77S 59.93% 7,056 40.07% 4,719 0.00%
Sidewalks & Curbs 500 59.93% 300 40.07% 200 0.00%
Stonn Sewers 250 59.93% 150 40.07% 100 0.00%
Street & Alley Repairs 44,500 59.93% 26,667 40.07% 17,833 0.00%
Manholes lampholes EIC 500 59.93% 300 40.07% 200 0.00%
Plant Towers Etc 20,000 59.93% 11,985 40.07% 8,015 0.00%
Meters & Meter Boxes 8,000 59.93% 4,794 40.07% 3,206 0.00%
Service Lines 1,000 59.93% 599 40.07% 401 0.00%
Hydrants & Valves 8,000 59.93% 4,794 40.07% 3,206 0.00%
Other - Sludge Removal 59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
Screening-landfi.l\ Fees 59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
59.93% 40.07% 0,00%
SUBTOTAl 105,025 62,938 42,087
Maintenance - Equioment
Furniture & Fixtures 400 59.93% 240, ,.40.07% 160 0.00%
Machinery Tools Equipment 27,500 59.93% 16,4~0/' 40.07% ll,020 0.00%
lnstrwnents Etc - Radio Maint 4,000 59.93% 2,391 40.07% 1,603 0.00%
Molor Vehicles 3,000 59,93% . 1,798 \ 40.07%, 1,202 0.00%
lease & Rental- Equipment 500 59.93% '. 300< 40.07% " , 200 0.00%
Pumps & Motors 33,000 59.93% I ,. . 19! 776 40.07% 13,224 0.00%
, i
Electronic Data Processing 2,500 59.93% /// 1,498 40.07% 1,002 0.00%
Maintenance Agreement 950 59.93% 569 40.07% 381 0.00%
Tire Repair 500 59.93% / ' <, ')00 40.07"10 200 0.00%
59.93% - 40.07% 0.00%
59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
SUBTOTAl 72,350 ,,43,357 28,993
Sundry Charges ~ "-
'.
Judgements Damages Etc ;' .- . 59:9}% 40.07% 0.00%
Auditing 19,000 ' , 59.93%.', ..... 5,993 40,07"10 4,007 0.00%
Medical Expenses 300 . 59.93% '. " , 180 40.07"10 120 0.00%
" ...
59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
SUBTOTAl 10,300 - 6,172 4,128
- .
Buildin2s Structures
Buildings 25,000 59.93% 14,982 40.07% 10,018 0.00%
-~,~- 59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
-.----..- , '59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
SUBTOTAl 25,000 14,982 10,018
Eauipment
Furniture & Fixtures 59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
Machinery-Tools-Equipment 59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
lnstrwnents & Apparatus 59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
Molor Vehicles 59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
CommwncationSynem 59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
59.93% 40.07% 0.00%
SUBTOTAl
TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION 1,452,397 1,017,582 434,815
Raw Water Supply
Utilities - Electricity 599,170 100.00% 599,170 0.00% 0.00%
Special Project -lake Creek Dam 15,000 100.00% 15,000 0.00% 0.00%
Operation & Maintenance - Pat Mayes 75,000 100.00% 75,000 0.00% 0.00%
Waler Storage Rights 60,000 100.00% 60,000 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 0,00% 0.00%
TOTAL RAW WATER SUPPLY 749,170 749,170
Page 4 of5
Account Descri tion
Water Transmission. Distribution
Distribution <8"
Transmission 8" to 24"
Transmission >24"
Meters and Meter Boxes
Hydrants and Valves
TOTAL WATER TRANSMISSION. DISTRIBUTION
Debt Service
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE
Utility Franchise Fee
Administrative Fees
TOTAL EXPENSES
Revenue Offsets
Water Taps and Extensions
Misc. Water and Sewer
Sanitation Billing Fee
Service Charges
Bulk Water Sales
Water and Sewer Charge Offs
Water and Sewer Returned Checks
Water and Sewer Copies
Interest Earned
Brush Pickup Fees
Credit Card Convenience Fee
SUBTOTAL:
Total Revenue Offsets
Other Contractual Revenue Offsets
Lamar Power Partners
Total Other Contractual Revenue Offsets
Total Revenue Requirement
_.-_._-.---~
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
BASE.EXTRA CAPACITY METHOD. BUDGET
Bud et
340,969
580,487
91,700
25,000
8,0.00
1,046,157
2,418,737
20.0,76.0
430,2.0.0
6,599,976
Base %
59.93%
59.93%
59.93%
.0..0.0%
.0..0.0%
65.63%
67.15%
1.0.0.00%
27,52.0 59.93%
7,5.0.0 100..0.0%
35,00.0 .0..0.0%
32,5.0.0 1.0.0.00%
12,.0.0.0 59.93%
(42,5.0.0) 100.00%
2,86.0 "".0..0.0%
25 ".0..0.0%
65,00.0 59:93"10~>,
2,5.0.0 100.00%
9.0.0 .0..0.0%
143,3.05 \ v /
143,305
-----..~
- _.~...........~.....___.. I
23.0,688 1.0.0..0.0%
230,688
6,225,983
Page 5 of5
Extra Capacity
Base Allocation %
2.04,332
347,868
54,953
607,153
1,587,511
134,812
43.0,2.0.0
4,573,244
(, -:
16,492
7,5.0.0
, 32,5.0.0
7,191
, ,(42,500)
38,952
2,5.0.0
62,636
62,636
4.0..07%
40..07%
4.0..07%
0.0.0%
10.0..0.0%
34.29%
28.il% .
.0..0.0%
40..07%
.0..0.0%
.0..0.0%
.0..0.0%
4.0..07%
.0..0.0%
.0..0.0%
.0..0.0%
4.0..07%
.0..0.0%
.0..0.0%
23.0,688 .0.00%
230,688
4,279,920
Extra-Cap
Allocation
136,637
232,62.0
36,747
414,004
829,36.0
1,734,622
41,884
1,692,737
Customer
Costs %
8,.0.0.0
.0..0.0%
.0..0.0%
.0..00"10
100..0.0%
.0..0.0%
.0..08%
56,443
4.73%
.0..0.0%
11,.028
.0..0.0%
.0..0.0%
1.0.0..00"/.
.0,00"10
.0..00"10
.0..00"/.
100.00%
100.00%
.0..00"/.
.0..00"/.
1.0.0..0.0%
4,8.09
26,.048
41,884
.0..0.0%
TABLE C.2
Customer
Costs
25,.0.0.0
25,0.00
1,867
9,5.05
292,11.0
35,.0.0.0
2,860
25
9.0.0
38,785
38,785
253,325
TABLE C.3
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
CUSTOMER CLASS ALLOCATION REVENUE RE UIREMENT WATER-BUDGET
Item Total Residential Commercial Campbell Soup T enaska m LCWSD
O&M Expenses
Supply 749,170 174,676 194,227 175,552 24,303 180,412
Production
Base 1,017,582 237,258 263,814 238,449 33,010 245,050
Max Day 434,815 64,696 43,058 167,802 71,649 87,609
Trans. & Dist.
Dist. <8"
Base 204,332 96,751 107,581
Max Day 136,637 82,038 54,599
Trans. 8" to 24"
Base 347,868 164,716 183,152 .
Max Day 232,620 139,666 92,953
Trans. > 24" '.
Base 54,953 12,813 'J4 247 . . 12,877 1,783 13,234
" " ,-
Max Day 36,747 5,468 .' .. 3,~39 14,181 6,055 7,404
Meters 25,000 15,522 ./ 7,154 1,624. 191 509
, .
Hydrants 8,000 5,476 :- 2,524 (,-,,/.
Warehouse 46,817 10,916\ 12,137 10,970 1,519 11,274
Billing & Collecting 255,738 215,937 i/39,559 48 73 121
Debt Service '-'...
", "
,
Supply 347,255 '. 80,966" 90,028 81,372 11,265 83,625
Production ,
",
Base 801,097 186,783 207,689 187,720 25,987 192,917
Max Day __-535,695 79,707 53,048 206,734 88,272 107,935
Dist. < 8" .' .,..-"
Base, 172,589 81,721 90,868
Max Day 115,410"._ 69,293 46,117
Trans. 8" to 24" .r'-~-
Base 124,776 59,081 65,694
Max Day , 83,438 50,097 33,341
Trans. > 24"
Base 141,794 33,061 36,761 33,226 4,600 34,146
Max Day - 94,818 14,108 9,389 36,592 15,624 19,104
Billing & Collection 1,867 1,576 289 0 I 1
Subtotal 5,969,016 1,882,324 1,651,869 1,167,150 284,331 983,342
Franchise Fees 200,760 63,309 55,558 39,256 9,563 33,073
Administration Fees 430,200 100,305 111,532 100,808 13,956 103,599
Total Cost of Service 6,599,976 2,045,939 1,818,959 1,307,214 307,850 1,120,014
Page 1 of2
Total Residential Commercial Campbell Soup T enaska III LCWSD
Base 4,573,244 1,281,558 1,415,039 867,336 122,844 886,467
Max Day 1,734,622 528,348 354,288 436,346 184,289 231,351
Customer 292,110 236,032 49,632 3,532 717 2,197
6,599,976 2,045,939 1,818,959 1,307,214 307,850 1,120,014
Base Revenue Offsets
Water Taps and Extensions 16,492 3,845 4,276 3,865 535 3,972
Misc. Water & Sewer 7,500 1,749 1,944 1,757 243 1,806
Bulk Water Sales 7,191 1,677 1,864 1,685 233 1,732
Service Charges 32,500 7,578 8,426 7,616 1,054 7,827
Water and Sewer Charge Offs (42,500) (9,909) (11,018) (9,959) (1,379) (10,235)
Brush Pickup Fees 2,500 583 648 586 81 602
Interest Earned 38,952 9,082 10,099 9,128 1,264 9,380
62,636 14,604 16,239 ...14,677 2,032 15,084
Extra-Capacity Revenue Offsets
Water Taps and Extensions 11,028 1,641 1,09f '. " 4,256 1,817 2,222
Bulk Water Sales 4,809 716 476 \ 1 856 792 969
. /2,579 .' .
Interest Earned 26,048 3,876 10,052 ~ 4,292 5,248
41,884 6,232 , 4,148 16,164' , 6,902 8,439
,,/ ,II / ,I
Customer Revenue Offsets ,.
. , .
Sanitation Billing Fee 35,000 28,281 \/ .. 5,947 423 86 263
Water and Sewer Returned Checks 2,860 2,311 486 35 7 22
Water and Sewer Copies 25 ", 20 4/ 0 0 0
".
Contract Customer Billing 900 "'<"" 727 153 11 2 7
38,785 , ' 31,339,. 6,590 469 95 292
, '.
Lamar Power (Raw Water) ,/-230,688
". ......--.........
Base 230,688 53,787 59,807 54,057 7,483 55,553
230 688---- - 53 787 59,807 54,057 7,483 55,553
..!.~____~._. '~"--....., J
- --
Total Residential Commercial Campbell Soup Tenaska III LCWSD
Base 4,279,920 1,213,167 1,338,993 798,602 113,329 815,830
Max Day" 1,692,737 522,116 350,141 420,182 177,387 222,912
Customer 253,325 204,693 43,042 3,063 622 1,905
6,225,983 1,939,976 1,732,176 1,221,847 291,338 1,040,646
Revenue Offsets Residential Commercial
MJC.WSC 30,977 27,659
Campbell Soup (60,443) (53,968)
T enaska III (8,290) (7,402)
Lamar County (177,038) (158,074)
Total Revenue Offsets (214,794) (191,786)
Total Residential Commercial
Base 2,854,357 1,363,333 1,491,024
Max Day 976,640 586,744 389,896
Customer 247,735 204,693 43,042
4,078,732 2,154,770 1,923,962
Page 2 of2
TABLE C-4
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
PROPOSED WATER RATES
PROPOSED WATER RATES
RESIDE~TIAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater
$8.00 for fIrst 200
39.00 for flIst 1,000
COMMERCIAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial 1 " to 2" Meter
Commercial 3 " Meter
Commercial 4" Meter
Commercial 6" Meter
Commercial 8" Meter or Greater
$9.75 for flIst 200
39.00 for flIst 1,000
140.00 for flIst 3,000
2,300.00 for flIst 100,000
3,450.00 for fIrst 150,000
4,600.00 for flIst 200,000 .' .
'-
, '-..,
;'. (""""","'-~
RESIDE~TIAL RATES
, Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater
-=~~~~_. ,~,:..,
$7,35 for fist 200
, 35.70 for fIrst 1,000
COMMERCIAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial 1 " to 2" Meter
Commercial 3 " Meter
Commercial 4" Meter
Commercial 6" Meter
Commercial 8" Meter or Greater
$8,93 for flIst 200
35.70 for flIst 1,000
126.00 for flIst 3,000
2,100.00 for flIst 100,000
3,150.00 for fIrst 150,000
4,200.00 for fIrst 200,000
Page 1 of 1
Volumetric Rate
$2.70 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.70 per CCF above Base Volume
Volumetric Rate
.. $2.70 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.21 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.21 per CCF aboye Base Volume
" $2.21 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.21 per CCF}bove Base Volume
. $2.21 per CCF above Base Volume
Volumetric Rate
$2.57 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.57 per CCF above Base Volume
Volumetric Rate
$2.57 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.10 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.10 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.10 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.10 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.10 per CCF above Base Volume
ACCOUIltOelcri 'on
W,nbo...
~
SoIarieslWoaos
SocialSeclrity
TMRS t Pcosion
Employee Hospitaliutions Ins
WorI:a',COIllp<ll.l&tionlns
UllClIlJlloyment Compensation
SlIbllityPay
SUBTOTAL
SIIlIPlicl
OtliccSupplios
~
Warin& Apporel
Motor Vehicles. Gaso1illc
Motor Vehicl... Oil t Lubricant
Motor Vehicl.. . Tim
LAUIldtyCIIIIliDaE~
SUBTOTAL
~
Commlllli",tions. Telephone
hwwc l BondJ
T_I Expcmes
Utiliti...E1eclricity
1JtiIiti...WII<rIlldGu
TlIiniIla.Tuition
SllBTOTAL
Mlin_. Buildi'i'
BuiJdinp t Grounds
SllBTOTAL
MAiIIlmm
FurnituR lFixtum
M.clUnery Tooa Equipment
Motor Vehicles
Elec1ronic D<l4 Procmina
SllBTOTAL
~
Audilini
SllBTOTAL
EauillmCIll
Mochinery.TooI~Equipmmt
Motor Vehicl..
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL WAREHOUSE
Bllllag " ColI.ct1on
~
SIIari..tWoa"
Social Seclrity
ThiRS l Pension
Employ.. Hospitalizations Ins
Woria', Compmsationlns
Uncmployment CompellSltion
0vel1ime
SlIbIlityP,y
SUBTOTAL
SIIlIPlicl
Otli.. Supplies
POIlIB'
Warin& App"'1
Motor Vehicles. Gaso1illc
Motor Vehicles. Oil t Lubricant
Motor Vehicles. Tim
MOlDI Vehicles. Banmes
LAUIldty CJanina E~
Motor AI'\>Il1UJ
Furnilult l Fixnm . Motor
SllBTOTAL
CITY OF PARIS
WATERA.'lD WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STlJDY
FLOW,BOD, TSS A.'lD NHl COST ALLOCA nON
TABLEC.5
s.- Actuol. Flow % Flow Allocation BOD % BOD Allocation TSS % TSS Allocation NHl% NHl Allocation CllItOmel CllItOmel C.,1.I
Co~%
~ "...---- .~.
29,461 592'1%
2,254 59.27%
3,226 59.27%
4,904 59.27%
2,123 59.27%
90 59.27%
59.27%
59.27%
59.27%
42,057
50 59.27%
125 59.27%
125 59.270/0
200 59.27%
25 59.27%
U5 59.27%
25 59.270/0
59.27%
59.27%
67l
1,250 59.27%
1,300 59.27%
59.27%
485 59.27%
225 59.27%
59.27%
59.27%
59.27%
3,260
250 59.27%
59.27%
5927%
250
25
200
250
59.27%
59.27%
59.270/0
59271~
59.27%
59.27%
17,461 25.61%
1,336 25.61%
1,912 2561%
2,907 25.61%
1,258 2561%
53 2561%
25.61%
2561%
25.61%
24,927
30 25.61%
74 2561%
74 2561%
119 25.61%
Il 25.61%
74 25.61%
15 2561%
25.61%
2561%
400
741 25.61%
771 2561%
2561%
287 25.61%
III 25.61%
25.61%
25.61%
25.61\\
1,932
148 2561%.
25611.; .
25.61%'"
148
25.61%
'Il 2561%
'119"25.61\\
148 "25.61%
, .. 25.6111
"
25.61\\
282
/
59 25.61%
25.61%
25.6W. .'
59
__ r- '.-
2561%
'. 25.61%
25.61%
25.61%
27,748
0.001I
0.001I
0.001I
0.00\\
o 00\\
0.001I
0.00%
0.00%
0.00\\
0.00%
7,l45 14.04\\
177 14.04\\
826 14.04\\
1,256 14.04%
544 14.04%
23 14.04%
1404\\
14.04%
1404\\
10,771
13 14.04%
32 14.04%
32 14.04%
51 14.04%
6 14.04%
32 14.04\\
6 14.04%
14.04%
14.04%
I7l
320 14.04% i
333 14.04W'
14.O4\\.
124 1404%
58 14.04%
14.04%\
.' . \,14.04\\ .J
. . ' 14.04\\
. 8J5
64'" 14.04%
14.04%
'14.04%
64
"
. 14.04\\ /
6" 14.04%.'
51 '14.04%
64 14.04%
"1404%
14.04%
4,136
316
453
689
298
13
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08\\
1.08%
1.08\\
1.08%
1.08%
1I8 0.00\\
24 0 00\\
3l 0.00\\
53 0.00%
23 0.001I
I 0.00\\
000\\
0.001I
o 00\\
454
14 0.00\\
14 0.001I
0.00\\
0.00\\
0.001I
0.00\\
0.00\\
0.00\\
35
o 00\\
0.00\\
0.001I
0.00\\
000\\
0.00%
0.001I
000\\
0.001I
0001I
0.001I
0.001I
0.00'11
o 001I
o 001I
0.00'11
5116
100.001I
100.00\\
100.00\\
100.001I
10000\\
100 001I
100 00\\
100.00\\
100.00\\
100.001I
000%
0.00%
000\\
0.00%
o 001I
0.00\\
0.00\\
0.001I
0.001I
116,599
9,242
13,228
22,049
2,528
405
475
100 ,,,59.27% "-
, .59.270/0
59.27%
100
59.27%
'59.27%
, 59.27%
5927%
\
46,817
116,599
. 9,242
13,228
. '22,049
2,528
405
0.00\\
0.001I
0.00\\
0.001I
0.00\\
0.000/.
0.001I
o 001I
0.00\\
0.00\\
164,050
17,lOO 0001I
25,000 0.00\\
1,250 000\\
1,500 0.00\\
75 000\\
m 0.00\\
38 000\\
25 0.00\\
900 0 00\\
0.00\\
46,163
0.00%
0.00\\
0.00%
0.00\\
0.001I
0.001I
o 00\\
0.00\\
0.00\\
0.00\\
PIi.lofl
", 122
26 14.04%
14.04%
14.04%
26
14.040/.
14.04%
14.04%
14.04%
11,990
0.001I
0.001I
o 001I
0001I
0.00%
0.001I
0.001I
0.001I
0.001I
0.00\\
0.00%
0.00\\
0.001I
0.00%
0.001I
0.00%
0.00\\
0.00\\
0.001I
0.000/.
5,905
7
18
18
28
4
18
4
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
95
-\\
176 .~, 1.08%
183 1.08%
1.08%
68 1.08%
32 1.08%
. \ 1.08%
'\
1.08%/;
1.08%
35
4
28
II
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
67
14
1.08%
1.08%
108%
14
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
1.08%
6J73
0.001I
0.00\\
0.000/.
0.001I
0.00\\
0.00\\
0.00\\
0.00\\
0.00\\
0.00\\
0.00%
0.00\\
0.00%
0.00\\
000\\
o 00\\
0.001I
0.00\\
0.00\\
o 00\\
10000\\
100.00%
10000\\
100.00\\
100.00\\
100.00\\
10000\\
100.001I
100.00\\
100.00\\
164,050
17,500
25,000
1,250
l,lOO
75
27l
38
25
900
46,563
TABLE C.,
CITY OF PARIS
WATER A."'D W ASTEW ATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FLOW,BOD, TSSA.'IIlNlO COST ALLOCATION
SeI><r Actual. Flow % Flow AlIOQtion 800% BOO AlIOQtion TSS% TSS AlIOQtiOll NIO% NIO AlIOQtiOll C_ C_COIlI
Account Oescri 'on COlt 1\
~
Communications. Telephone l,2l0 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00% 1,250
Cor All_ 4,200 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100,(1)% 4,200
Insurwe ol !loads 2,500 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100(1)% 2,500
T "",I Expenset 0,(1)% 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00%
Utilities. Electricity 1,864 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00% 1,864
Credit Cord Smice Fee 413 0,(1)% 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00% 413
Utilities. War.rllld Gu 610 0,00\\ 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00% 610
TlIinin&.Tuition,EIc, 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00\'.
COlllII!lIDts 12.500 0,00% o 00\\ 0,(1)% 0,00% 100,00% 12.500
SUBTOTAL 23,376 23,376
Mainrtnlnr1! . Ruildinl'
BuiJdinas ol Orounds 2.soo 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00% 2,lOO
0,00% 0,00\\ 0,(1)% 0,00% 100 00\\
o 00\\ 0,00% 000% 0,(1)% 100,00%
SUBTOTAL 2,lOO 2,lOO
~
Mochinll)' Tool. Equipmenl 2,500 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00% 2,lOO
lns1ruments EIc, lUdio Mainl 250 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00\\ 100,00% 210
MotorV.hicles 710 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100(1)% 750
Electl'llllic Oota Processina l,2l0 0,00\\ 0,00% 0,00\'. 0,00% 100,00% l,2l0
Main_ Apment 0,(1)% 0,(1)% 0,00\\ o 00\\ 100,00%
0(1)% 0,00% 0,00% 000\\ 10000\\
0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00%
SUBTOTAL 8,7l0 .' 8,750
~
~
Auditina 1,500 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%, ' 0,00% 100,(1)% l,lOO
SafWepina Fees 0,00% 0,00\\ 0,000/0 0,00% 100,00%
WIl<r PurcIwes. AnDmd Areas 9,0Q0 000% 0,00% 000% 0,00% 100,00% 9,000
SUBTOTAL 10,500 , . 10.soo
" , - ,
Buildin"S~ .. '. \
Buildinil 0,00% 0,00% / '0.00% 000%, 100,00%
0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00%
0,00% 0,00% 0,00% / 0,00% 100,00%
SUBTOTAL
~ \
FumilUl10l Fixtures 0,00% 0,00% 0,(1)% 0,(1)% 100,00%
~.Toob-Equipmenl 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100,(1)%
MolorVehicles 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% ,'. 0,00% 100.00%
Communication Systtm 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 100,00%
Mj,ccllaneoua 0,00\\ 0,00% 0.(1)% 0,00% 100,00%
0,00% .:. 0,00% ' 0,00\'. 0,00% 100,00%
0,00% 0(1)% 0,(1)% 0,(1)% 100,00\'.
SUBTOTAL "
" .
TOTAL BILLL"IC" COLLECTION ~l,738 ~S,738
--~'.
Sewer ~bIDteD.Dce
~
Salariesol Waaes 174,I7l 100,00% o--'.174,17l . 0,00\'. 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,(1)%
SocW Security 16,383 100,00% ,/--,,16,383 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
1MRS ol P....on 23,4l2 10000\\ 23,4l2' 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
Employee Ilospitaliutionlns 36,702 100,00% 36,702 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
Worka'. Compensationlns 7,850 100,00% 7,8l0 0,00% 0,00% 0,00\\ 0,00%
UnemplO)1DCIlI Compensation ~.., .~-..." , 810 100,(1)% 810 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 000%
Overtime 40,000 100,00% 40,000 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
SlIbility Pay 100,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0(1)%
. 100,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,(1)%
100,00% - o 00\\ 0,00\\ 0,00% 0,(1)%
SUBTOTAL 299,370 299~70
~
otIice Supplies 700 10000% 700 0,00% 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,(1)%
Postaae , 200 100,00\\ 200 0,00% 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,00%
Food , 300 100,00% 300 0,00% 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,00%
WcIlica Apportl /3,000 100,00% 3,000 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
Mol<< Vehicles. GuoIine Il,OOO 100,00% Il,OOO 0,00% 0,000/. 0,00% 0,00%
Mol<< V.hicles. O1Iol lubriClllt 1,000 100,00% 1,000 0,00% 0,(1)% O,IX)',> 0,(1)%
MotorVehicl... Tim 2,500 100,00% 2,lOO 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,(1)%
Mol<< Vehicl.. . !l4tteri.. 400 100,00% 400 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
Lalllldry CI-, EIc 100 100,00% 100 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
Cbcmical Medical EIc l,ooo 100,00% l,ooo 0,00% 0,00% 0,(1)% 0,00%
Photographic Suppli.. 100,00% 0,00% 0,00% 000% 000%
100,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
SUBTOTAL: 28,200 28,200
~
Communications. Telephone 3,000 100,00% 3,000 0,00% 000% 0,00% 0,00%
Insurwe ol Bood. 4,4l0 100,00% 4,450 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,(1)%
Court COllI. Speci.tJ Smi.. Fees 100,00% 0,000/. 0,00% 0,00'-' 0,00%
Tm.1 Expenset 400 100,00% 400 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
Utiliti...Electri~ly 3,728 100.00% 3,728 0,00\'. 0,(1)% 0,(1)% 000'-'
Freiiht ol Expm 100,(1)% 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,(1)% 0,00%
Mj...1laneoua 100,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,(1)%
AslociatiOlll 400 100,00% 400 000% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
Utiliti... War.r ol Gu 2,000 10000% 2,000 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,(1)%
TlIinin&.TuitiOll 1,250 100,00% 1,250 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
100,00\\ 0,00\'. 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%
100,00% 0,(1)% 0,00% 0,(1)% 000'-'
SUBTOTAL: Il,228 Il,228
P'a. 2 orl
TABLE C.S
CITV OF PARIS
WATER A.\"D WASTEWA1ER COST OF SERVICE SnIDV
FLOW.BOD. TSS AND NID COST ALLOCA noN
ScI<<r A<tlWJ F10wIl FlowAJIocation BOD II BOD Allocation TSSII TSS AJloation NIDII NID AJloation ClIItOmer Customer Cosu
Account Descri 'on CCOlII
MlinIPr'lJftt'J! . Buildill,f!
Buildinp 1 GroundJ 1.000 100.00II 1.000 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II
Sonilll)'ScI<<r 20.000 100.00II 20.000 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II 000II
Slr<cll AII<y Repairs 50.000 10000II 50,000 000II 0.00II 0.00II 0.00\'.
Mulholesl.lmpbDles EIe 1.000 100.00II 1.000 0.0011 0.00II 000II o 00II
Smic< Lilla 1.000 100.00II 1,000 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II
Smiu Foo:e Main 6,000 100.00% 6,000 0.00II 0.00II o 00II 0.00II
100 00II 0.0011 0.00II 0.00II 000II
100 00II 0.00% 0.00II 0.00% o 00II
SUBTOTAL 87.000 87.000
~bintm.lnrJ! . F-qpipmrnt
FlIlIlinn lFixtu!a 100 100 00II 100 0.00% 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II
Mo<:hinery T 0010 Equipment 20.000 100.00II 20.000 0.00% o 00II 000II 0.00\'.
!Il.llnlmcntI EIe. RJdio Maint 1.000 100.000/. 1.000 0.00% o 00II 0.00% 0.00%
Motor Vehicle. 11.000 100.00II 11.000 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II 0.00'4
r.a.e 1 Rerlt.ol Equipment 10.000 100.00II 10,000 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II
Electronic DolIl'looessina 1,000 100.00II 1.000 0.00II 0.00II 0.00% o 00II
Tite Repair 200 100.000/. 200 0.00% 000II 0.00II 0.00%
100 00II 000% 000% o 00II 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 47.300 47,300
Swldo:..CIww
Illdgmcull lJtmsaes EIe 1.000 100.00% 1.000 0.00% 000II 0.00% 0.00II
AuditinS 2.000 100.00II 2.000 0.00II 0.00% 0.00II 0.00II
Medial ExpenJe. 2,000 100.00II 2,000 0.00% 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II
100.00% 000% 0.00II , 0.00% 0.00%
SUBTOTAL: 1,000 1.000
Buildina-,. SlrncturM
Sonilll)'ScI<<r 100.00II 0.00% 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II
Mulholes lImpholes EIe 100.00% 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II 0.00II
Smic< Lilla 100.00II 0.00II t 0.00II \ 000II 0.00%
SMr Mains " ','
100.00II 0.00II f. " 0.00% ,,,_~ \ 0.00II 000II
1 00 00II o 00II '0.00II '. 000II 0.00II
SUBTOTAL
i
~ .' /
Mo<:hinery. T ool..Equipment 100.00II o 00II ~". 0.00% '- 0.00II 0.00II
Motor Vehicles 100.00II 000II/ . 0:00II 0.00II 0.00II
100.00II 0.00II .. . 000II 0.00II 0.00%
100.00% 0.00% 0.00II 0.00% 0.0011
SUBTOTAL:
Forte Account ~ecl
Public Woro Mj...1lsneous I l I 100.00II I'''..... 0.00% . 0.00II .' 0.00II 0.00II
100.000/. .>'.0:00II 0.000/. . 0.00II 0.00II
100 00II ....... 0 00II 0.00II 0.000/. o 00II
SUBTOTAL: "
..... ,
'''' "y
TOTAL SEWIR MAINTE~ANCE 482,1l9t 482,098
Wuttwlter Treatment
~
SalJrieslWoges '697.931 20.99\\ 146,496 49.68Y. 346,732 27.23% 190.047 2.1011 14.617 0.00%
SociaISecurily S4.616 20.99% ---11.464 '49.68% 27.133 27.23% 14.812 2.1011 1.147 0.00II
TMRS l Pen,;on 76,830 . 20.99\\ -.....16.127 .. 49.68% 38,169 2723% 20.921 2.1011 1.613 0.00%
Employee Hospit.olization Ins 120,093 20.99'4 21,208 49.68% 19.662 27.23% 32,701 2.1011 2.lll 0.00%
WorUt', Compensation Ins 21.418 2099\\ 4.496 4968% 10.640 272311 I,m 2.1011 410 0.00II
U....ployment Compensation .' ~----...... .....2.llO lO.99'4 Il9 4968% 1,21l 2711% 686 2.1011 13 0.00II
o.-ertimc ..-'--, 16.000 20.990/. 3,llS 49.68% 7,949 27.23% 4,317 2.1011 336 0.00II
SlIbililyP,y 20.99'1. 49.68% 27.2311 2.1011 0.00%
20 99\\ 4968% 27.2l\\ 2.1011 0.00%
20 99'4 4968% 27.l3% 2.1011 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 989.408 l07.677 491.138 l69.416 20.778
~
otIlceSupplies 6.000 ! lO.99\\ 1,219 49.68% l,981 l711% 1,634 2.1011 Il6 0.00II
Pootog. 1.150 . lO.990/. 321 49.6811 770 27.2311 422 2.1011 33 0.00%
Food 2lO 2099\\ 12 4968% 124 27.23% 68 2.1011 I 0.00II
Weorina Apporel 8.000 20.99\\ 1,679 49.6811 3.974 l7.l311 2,178 2.1011 168 0.00II
Motor Vehicles. Guolinc 6.000 20 99\\ l,2l9 49.68% 2.981 27.2311 1.634 2.1011 126 0.00%
Mawr Vehicles. Oill Lubricant 600 20.99\\ 126 49.68% 298 27.2311 163 2.1011 13 0.00II
Motor Vehicles. Tires 1.420 20.99\\ 298 49.6811 70l 27.2311 387 2.1011 30 0.00II
MolO! Vehicles. Bal1eries l40 20.99\\ 50 49.68% 119 271111 61 l.IOII I 0.00II
Minor Apparatus 9,\00 20.99\\ 1.994 496811 4,720 271111 2,l87 l. I 011 200 o 00II
Lallllllzy Cleonina EIe 1,\00 lO.99\\ 311 49.6811 741 271111 408 2.1011 3l 0.00II
Cbcmial Medical EIe 141.000 20.99% 30,436 49.68% 72,036 27.23% 39.484 2.1011 3.041 0.00II
Mechlnial lOO 20.990/. 101 49.68% 248 27.l3% 136 2.1011 11 0.00%
Bocanial Seed, EIe 210 20.99\\ l2 49.68% Il4 27.l311 68 2.1011 I 0.00%
Other Supplies 750 20.99\\ Il7 4968% 373 27.23% 204 2.1011 16 o 00II
P!loolgrapbic Supplies lOO 20.99\\ 101 49.68% 248 27.23% 136 2.1011 11 0.00II
20.99\\ 49.68% 27.23% 2.1011 000II
2099\\ 49.68% 271111 2.1011 0.00II
SUBTOTAL 182.060 38,214 90.447 49,m 3,823
CmlllIollIIl
Communic.stioos . T .Iepbone 3,000 20.99\\ 630 49.6811 1.490 27.2311 817 2.1011 63 0.00II
Insunnce l 8004. 11.000 2099\\ 2,309 49.68% 1.461 27.2311 2,991 2.1011 231 0.00%
CouttCOIl.SpecialServiuF... lO.990/. 49.680/. 27.23% 21011 0.00II
T......I Expenses 2,000 20.99\\ 410 49.68% 994 27.2311 141 2.1011 42 o 00II
PublicatiOlll 400 20.99\\ 84 49.68% 199 27.l3% 109 2.1011 8 0.00II
Utitities.Eleciricily 331.494 2099'4 70.4l0 496811 166.674 27.l3% 91.llS 2.1011 7.O4l o 00II
FmihtlE:qms 471 20.99\\ 100 49.6811 236 272311 129 2.1011 10 0.00%
Mi...u.noous 41,201 20.99\\ 8,649 49.68% 20.471 27.2311 l1,2l0 2.1011 861 0.00II
AssociltiOlll 2.lOO 2099\\ m 496811 1,242 271111 681 2.1011 13 000II
Utitities.W'lerlGu 2,200 20 99\\ 462 49681\ 1.093 27.2311 199 2.1011 46 0.00II
TraininS. Tuiti.. 1.800 20.99\\ 1,217 49.68% 2.881 27.2311 l.l79 2.1011 122 0.00II
Testina . Analysis 21.041 2099\\ 4.417 49.68% 10.4l1 272311 I.m 2.1011 442 0.00\'.
2099\\ 49.6811 27.2311 2.1011 000II
20.99\\ 49.68% 272311 2.1011 0.00%
SUBTOTAL: 42l.1I9 89,233 211.199 Ill.76O 8,928
Pogel or I
TABLE C.S
CITY OF PARIS
WATERA.'ID WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE S11JDY
FLOW,BOD, TSS AND NHl COST AUOCATION
s..... A<:1uW Flow \I F1owAllOCltioo BOD \I BOD AIlocatioo TSS\\ TSS AIlocatiOll Nll3\\ Nll3 AIlocatiOll C_ C_Cosu
Acoolllll D=i '00 CO>I%
MlintP.nlftl'#.. Buildinp
Build... l Orouods 52,000 20.99% 10,91l 49.68% 25,834 27.23\\ 14,160 2.1011 1,092 0001I
Bridl..l CuMru 100 20.99% 21 49.68% 50 27.23% 27 2.1011 2 0.001I
FiltcrBelsl Vm.. 10,000 20.99% 2,099 4968% 4,968 27.23% 2,7ll 2.1011 210 0.001I
SidOl'1!b l CUlbl lOO 20.99% 105 49.68% 248 27.23% 136 2.1011 II 0.001I
SIloet l Alley RopIin 4,000 20.99% 840 4968\\ 1,987 27.23\\ 1,089 2.1011 84 0001I
Monhoies l.amphol.. EIe 250 20.99% 52 4968\\ 124 27.23\\ 68 21011 5 o 001I
Meters l M.ter Box.. 8,000 20.99% 1,679 49.68\\ 3,974 27.23\\ 2,178 2.10\\ 168 0.001I
SCl'\iceLines 1,250 20.99% 262 4968\\ 621 27.23\\ 340 2.10\\ 26 0.00\\
HydnnU l Vah.. lOO 20.99% 105 49.68\\ 248 27.23% 136 2.10\\ II 0.00\\
Other. Sludg. RcowvaJ 5,000 20.99% 1,0SO 49.68\\ 2,484 27.23\\ 1~62 2.10\\ 105 0.00\\
Smcnina. Landfill F... 4,lOO 20.99% 945 49.68\\ 2,236 21.23% 1,225 2.1011 95 0.001I
20.99% 49.68% 27.23% 2.1011 0.00\\
2099% 49.68\\ 2723% 2.10\\ 0.00\\
SUBTOTAL 86,100 18,072 42,774 23,445 1,808
MAintmlnr1'. EqJ1ipmml
FlIlIlilUlt l Fixnm 7SO 20.99% 157 4968% 373 27.23% 204 2.1011 16 0.001I
"""binery Tools Equipmenl 73,955 20.99% 15,523 49.68\\ 36,741 27.23% 20,138 2.1011 1,553 0.001I
lnmoncnu Ell:. Radio Maint 2,000 20.99% 420 49.68\\ 994 27.23% 545 2.10\\ 42 0.00\\
MotaVchicl.. 2,000 20.99% 420 49.68\\ 994 21.2l\\ 545 2.1011 42 0.00\\
Misccllaneow Repair lOO 2099% 105 49.68% 248 27.23% 136 2.10\\ II 0.001I
Lease l RCIllal. Equi\DCllt 2,000 20.99% 420 49.68\\ 994 27.23% 545 21011 42 0.001I
Pumps l Moton 18,000 20.99% 3,ns 49.68\\ 8,942 27.23\\ 4,901 21011 378 0.001I
Elo:lIOnic Data Proc"'"'a 4,lOO 20.99% 945 49.68% 2,236 27.23% 1,225 21011 95 0.00\\
Mlinlcnaoce Apmcnt 4SO 20.99% 94 49.68\\ 224 27.23% 123 2.10\\ 9 o 00\\
TIRRcpair ISO 20.99% 31 49.68\\ 75 27.23% 41 2.1011 3 0.00\\
20.99% 4968% 27.23\\ 2.1011 0001I
2099% 4968% 27.23% 2.1011 o 001I
SUBTOTAL: 104,305 21,894 51,819 28,402 2,190
,
~ ( (
"
Audilin& 11,000 20.99% 2,309 49.68\\ 5,465 27.23\\ 2,995 2.1011 231 0001I
1udl.....U, Damaa.., Ell:. 20.99\\ 4968\\ /.\ 27.23% 2.1011 ~ 0001I
Medical Expenses 1.000 20.99% 210 49.68% . 491. 272l\\ 27l . 21011 21 0001I
SUBTOTAL: 12,000 2,519 .5,962 3,268 252
~
"""binery.Tool..Equi\DCllt 40,000 20.99\\ 8,396 49.68% 19,872'. 27.23\\ 10,892 -'2.1011 840 0.00\\
Instnanalu l Apparatus 30,000 20.99% 6,297 49.68% . 14,904 " 27.23\\ 8,169 2.1011 630 0.001I
MotorVchicl.. 20.99% 4968\\~ ,27.23% 2.1011 0.001I
CommunicatiOll S)'1lcm 20.99% 49.68% 27.23% 2.10% 0.00\\
Buildinss 20.99% 49.68\\ 27.23% 2.1011 0.00\\
20.99% 49.68\\ 27.23% 2.1011 000\\
SUBTOTAL 70,000 14,693 34,n6 \ 19,061 1,470
T.lal Wlltewatcr Treatment 1,868,992 J92~1 928,.515 508,927 39,249
"
Lln Start..
~
s.Jori..lW'8C1 85,436 100.001I' 85,436 0.001I 0.00\\ 0.00\\ o 00\\
SociaISo:urity 7~00' 100001I 7~00 0001I 0.00\\ 000\\ 0.00%
ThlRS l Pcmion 10,4SO . 10000\\ 10,4SO 0.00% 0.001I 0.001I 0.00\\
Employee Hospitalization In. 14,708 100.00\\ 14,708 0.00\\ o 001I 000% 0.001I
Work"'. Compcl\lltionlna 2,841 100.001I 2,841 0.00% 0.00\\ 0.001I 0.00\\
Uncmpl"l1l1cnt Compcl\lltion 360 100.001I'--"_ .)60 " 0.001I 0.00\\ o 00\\ OOO'~
o..nime 10,000' . 100001I - - --- 10,000.- 0.00\\ o 001I 0001I 0.001I
S14bilityP,y 100.00\\ o 001I 0.001I 0.00\\ 0.00\\
100.00\\ 000\\ 0.00\\ 0.000/. 0.00\\
~.~- 100.001I 0.00% 0000/. 000% 0.001I
SUBTOTAL ..131,095 131,095
SJalig
Office SuppliCl lOO 100.00\\ lOO 0.00% 0.00\\ 0.00\\ 0.00%
Postag. 2SO 100.001I . 250 0.00\\ 0.001I 0.00% 0.00\\
Food 100.001I 0.001I 0.001I 0.00\\ 0.00\\
Wcarin&AppmI 1,000 100.000/. 1,000 0.00% 0.00\\ 0.00\\ 0.00\\
Motor Vchi.l.. . Quolin. 3,lOO 10000\\ 3,500 0.000/. 000\\ 000\\ 0.00\\
Motor Vchicl... Oill Lubricant 400' 10000\\ 400 0.001I 0.00\\ o 00\\ 0.00\\
Motor Vchicl... Tim . 600 100.00\\ 600 0.00\\ 0.001I 0.000/. 0.001I
Motor Vchicl... Ballcri.. .150 100.00\\ 150 0.00% 0.001I 0.00\\ o 00\\
Minor Apparatus 250 100.00\\ 2SO 000\\ o 001I 0.001I 0.00\\
LauncIIy Clcanin& Ell: 200 100 00\\ 200 0.00\\ 000\\ o 001I 0.00\\
Chemical Medical EIe 15,000 100 00\\ 15,000 o 001I 0.001I 0.001I o 00\\
Mo:banical 100 100.00\\ 100 0.001I 0.001I 0.00\\ 0001I
BotAnical S..ch Ell: 100.00\\ 0.00\\ 0.00\\ 0.00\\ 0.00\\
Other Suppli.. 50 100.001I 50 0001I 0.001I 000\\ o 001I
Pbotograpbic Suppli.. 100 100.00\\ 100 0.001I 0.001I 0.00\\ 0.00\\
100.001I 0001I 0.000/. o 00\\ 0.00\\
100.00\\ o 00\\ 0.001I 0.00\\ 0.00\\
SUBTOTAL 22,100 22,100
CDnilIIlIII1
Communications. T.lephon. 8,750 10000\\ 8,750 000% 000\\ 0.00\\ 0.001I
CorAllo"",ce 10000\\ 0.001I o 001I 0.00\\ 0.001I
rn.u.....l Bond. 4,000 100.00\\ 4,000 0001I 0.00\\ o 00\\ 000\\
TlIItl Expenses lOO 100.001I lOO 0.00\\ 0.001I 0.001I 0.001I
Publications 100 100 001I 100 0.00% o 00\\ 0.001I 0.001I
Utiliti...Elo:lri.ity 111,831 100.00\\ 111,831 0.00\\ 0.00\\ 0.00\\ 0.00\\
Freiiht !.Express 150 100.001I 150 0.000/. 0.00\\ 0.00\\ o 001I
Miscellaneow 1,lOO 100.001I l,lOO 0001I 0.00\\ o 001I o 00\\
A.uociations 300 100.00\\ 300 0.00\\ 0.00\\ 0.00\\ o 00\\
Utiliti...W,terlGu 1,750 100 00\\ 1,750 0.001I 0.00\\ 0.00\\ 000\\
T!Iinina.TuitiOll 750 100.00\\ 750 o 001I o 001I 0.001I 0.001I
T eslin& . A1Wysi. lOO 100.00\\ lOO 0.00\\ 0.000/. o 00\\ 0.001I
100.001I o 00\\ 0.001I 000\\ 0001I
100.001I 0.00\\ 0.001I 0000/. o 00\\
SUBTOTAL 130,131 130,131
P'I' 4 of 5
Pagel of l
TABLE C.6
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
PROPOSED WASTEWATER RATES
EXCESS CHARGE
BOD Revenue Requirement
BOD Ibs.
BOD Rate
$ 1,217,363
1,567,656
$ 0.78 Per lb. above 250 mg/1
TSS Revenue Requirement
TSS Ibs.
TSS Rate
$ 667,248
1,560,080
$ 0.43 Per lb. above 250 mg/1
NH3 Revenue Requirement
NH3 Ibs.
NH3 Rate
$ 51,457
102,533
$ 0.50 Per lb. above 30 mg/1
PROPOSED WASTEWATER RATES_,
,
\
RESIDENTIAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Volumetric Rate
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater
$9.00 for r~t 200
42.00 for first 1,boo ,
\ '... . ''''"
, \ ",
$3.64 per CCF above Base Volume
$3.64 per CCF above Base Volume
COMMERCIAL RATES
"';.--....
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial I " to 2" Meter
Commercial Larger than 2" Meter /--".
,.' Base Charge (Cubic Foot) .
:~:=-.:--------
$12.00 for first 200
. 42.00 for first 1,000
84.00 for first 2,000
Volumetric Rate
$3.80 per CCF above Base Volume
$3.80 per CCF above Base Volume
$3.80 per CCF above Base Volume
-'
CURRENT WASTEWATER RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Volumetric Rate
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater
$7.98 for first 200
38.33 for fust 1,000
$3.47 per CCF above Base Volume
$3.47 per CCF above Base Volume
COMMERCIAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Volumetric Rate
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial 1 " to 2" Meter
Commercial Larger than 2" Meter
$lLl3 for fust 200
38.33 for fust 1,000
72.45 for fust 2,000
$3.62 per CCF above Base Volume
$3.62 per CCF above Base Volume
$3.62 per CCF above Base Volume
Page 1 of I
IMPACT ON AVERAGE MONTHLY BILL
Recovery through 100% Minimum Bill I 0% Volumetric
Dollar %
Current Proposed Increase Increase
Average Residential Monthly Bill $ 43.35 $ 47.02 $ 3.67 8.5%
Average Commercial Monthly Bill 69.58 73.52 3.94 5.7%
Revenue Ratio. 37:63
Recovery through 75% Minimum Bill 125% Volumetric
Dollar %
Cu rre nt Proposed Increase Increase
Average Residential Monthly Bill $ 43.35 $ 46.96 $ 3.61 8.3%
Average Commercial Monthly Bill 69.5e 74.22 4.64 6.7% "
\
, ' ,
Revenue Ratio. 35:65 i " .,.)
,
/' /\. \
, ,
I
, ,
Recovery through 50% Minimum BiII/50% Volumetric
Current
Dollar
Increase
Proposed
Average Residential Monthly Bill
Average Commercial Monthly Bill
'........,
$
43.35 $
69.58
Revenue Ratio. 34:64
....----..
,/ ..,---.. "
/J./'< '" \
. \
. \ "..,
, '" /"
Recovery through 25% Minimum Bill 175% Volum~trlc . I / /
:j., '- /---=:::-p~~far
Current . Proposed Increase
%
Increase
.......----...
,/ .....---...... '.
Average Residential Monthly Bill ,', $ 43.35 $
Average Commercial Monthly Bill 'I 69.58
\.
\ '\\
. 4'6.34~; $
" .'" /
74.21'
.~/
2.99
4.63
6.9%
6.7%
'\
,
Revenue Ratio. 32:68
\
,
i/
//
... ,I
Recovery through 0% Minimum Bill I 100% VQlumetric
Dollar %
Current Proposed Increase Increase
Average Residential Monthly Bill $ 43.35 $ 46.18 $ 2.83 6.5%
Average Commercial Monthly Bill 69.58 74.54 4.96 7.1%
Revenue Ratio. 30:70
Recovery through changing Minimum Bill Volumes
Current
Dollar
Increase
%
Increase
Proposed
Average Residential Monthly Bill
Average Commercial Monthly Bill
$ 43.35 $
69.58
49.39 $
75.77
6.04
6.19
13.9%
8.9%
Revenue Ratio - 40:60
Page 1 of 1
Table 0-1
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater
Cost of Service Study
Table D-2
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater
Cost of Service Study
RECOVERY THROUGH 1000/0 MINIMUM BILL I 00/0 VOLUMETRIC
WATER RATES
RESIDE~'TL\L RATES
Current Proposed Dollar % Current Proposed Dollar %
Base Charge Base Charge Increase Increase Volumetric Volumetric Increase Increase
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less $ 7.35 $ 9.00 $ 1.65 22.4% $ 2.57 $ 2.57 $ 0.0%
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater 35.70 42.00 6,30 17.6% 2.57 2.57 0,0%
COMMERCL\L RATES
Current Proposed Dollar
Base Charge" Base Charge Increase
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial 1 " to 2" Meter
Commercial 3" Meter
Commercial 4" Meter
Commercial 6" Meter
Commercial 8" Meter or Greater
$
8.93 $
35.70
126.00
2,100.00
3,150,00
4,200,00
11.00 $
42.00
150.00
2,400.00
3,550.00
4,700.00
2.07
6.30
24.00
300,00
400.00
500.00
%
Increase
,1'//"'\
('1,// \'......
//<> Current
'I "
. <: Volumetric
\., ' "
%
Increase
Proposed Dollar
Volumetric Increase
/' \
23.2% I ., \
, 1 ' ,
17.60(0/\"
)~.O%
..~14.3% \ \
I \
./ 12.7% / /~~ \
11.9~~</ ',J
'. '\
'" \....
',) $
" \.
2.57 n
, '\j! ./
2.10 /
2.101
f10
2.10
2.10
2,57 $
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0,0%
0,0%
/t;J
\, I'':
'./ ,/
/
"
. "-
./ ~"'. ....~-.......
..il' , ,"-.. "
,// \. \. ~,..............-
W ASTEW A TERRATES
j
/~,.
," /..-......,,'\
./,/ ,. '" /;
... ,I " ;
Current/^,~. Proposedi Dollar// %
Base Charge 'Base ChargWifcrease.... Increase
--.. \, //,//
\/ /
i
, "
RESIDENTIAL RATES
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential 1" Meter or Greater
. .... / /
':i; 0.00 $
45.00/';
, v //
)/
I.'
$""--7 ;98 $
../,>'3i33'\
" ,I \
,
CO~nIERCIAL RUES
.' I
. \
j\\.
""\
'\ \\\ / ,I'
" \ ) I
....\ Ii
'. \ /
curr~'nt\'~/ Proposed
Base Chafge Base Charge
Dollar
Increase
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial 1 " to 2" Meter
Commercial Larger than 2" Meter
$
11.13 $
38.33
72.45
13.00 $ 1.87
45,00 6.67
85.00 12.55
Page I of I
........... .
Current Proposed Dollar
Volumetric Volumetric Increase
%
Increase
2.02
6,67
25.3%
17.4%
3.47 $
3.47
3.47 $
3.47
0.0%
0,0%
$
%
Increase
Current Proposed Dollar
Volumetric Volumetric Increase
%
Increase
16.8%
17.4%
17.3%
$
3.62 $
3.62
3.62
3.62 $
3,62
3.62
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
RECOVERY THROUGH 750/0 MINIMUM BILL / 250/0 VOLUMETRIC
Table D.3
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater
Cost of Service Study
WATER RATES
RESIDENTL\L RATES
Current Proposed Dollar % Current Proposed Dollar %
Base Charge Base Charge Increase Increase Volumetric Volumetric Increase Increase
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less $ 7.35 8.75 $ 1.40 19.0% $ 2.57 $ 2.63 $ 0.06 2.3%
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater 35.70 40.00 4.30 12.1% 2.57 2.63 0.06 2.3%
COMMERCL\L RATES
% "- Proposed
Current Proposed Dollar , Current Dollar %
/ \ '.
Base Charge Base Charge Increase Increase <Volumetric Volumetric Increase Increase
/// "\ '\
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less .. / \ \,
$ 8.93 $ 10.50 $ 1.57 17.6% \, $ ',\\ 2.57 $ 2.63 $ 0.06 2.3%
Commercial 1 " to 2" Meter 35.70 40.00 4.29 12.0% '. \ 2.10 2.15 0.05 2.4%
/'\. .. \,
15.1%//\\, '.) .-
Commercial 3" Meter 126.00 145.00 19.00 2.10, .' / 2.15 0.05 2.4%
, / ',-,I 2.10 ',/
Commercial 4" Meter 2,100.00 2,350.00 250.00 11,.9,% 2.15 0.05 2.4%
, /
Commercial 6" Meter 3,150.00 3,500.00 350.00 ,11:1% 2JO 2.15 0.05 2.4%
Commercial 8" Meter or Greater 4,200.00 4,650.00 450.00 /'',.10.7% C\ 2.10 2.15 0.05 2.4%
, \
/ " .. ~ \
- . \_'\,,,/:,~;/"\J
RESIDENiL\L RATES
,:" /I~\ \. ..............,"'~
:/ '\ ".,
- \. ,/.i":-:..,/-)
\ // 'II
, I ii'
,',//1 /./
" /....)
'~\" /1//
. ",I
,,' /
j
W ASTEWA TER RATES
~~....,
Current, ~roposed \ Dollar '- %
Base Charge / Base Charge Increase'. \, Increase
Current Proposed Dollar
Volumetric Volumetric Increase
%
Increase
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less $
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater
/1./.\>... . / ; / I
.' -- ~'./
7.98 $... ,/9.50-$--'::t52 19.1% $ 3.47 $ 3.56 $ 0.09 2.6%
38.33 '. \,1 43.00 4.67 12.2% 3.47 3.56 0.09 2.6%
,----~
/...'>.....---........""'"
,/1 '\\\
.' ;'
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial 1" to 2" Meter
Commercial Larger than 2" Meter
:J''"\.'\\
" -,'\,
'..\ "
Curr~nt , ~roposed
Base Charge! Base Charge
..' ;'
I /
$ 1(13 $ 13.00
38.33 43.00
72.45 80.00
Dollar % Current Proposed Dollar %
Increase Increase Volumetric Volumetric Increase Increase
$ 1.87 16.8% $ 3.62 $ 3.71 $ 0.09 2.5%
4.67 12.2% 3.62 3.71 0.09 2.5%
7.55 10.4% 3.62 3.71 0.09 2.5%
COM.'\oJERCL\L R~ TES
Page 1 of 1
Table D.4
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater
Cost of Service Study
RECOVERY THROUGH 50% MINIMUM BILL / 50% VOLUMETRIC
WATER RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES
Current Proposed Dollar % Current Proposed Dollar %
Base Charge Base Charge Increase Increase Volumetric Volumetric Increase Increase
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less $ 7.35 $ 8.00 $ 0.65 8.8% $ 2.57 $ 2.70 $ 0.13 5.1%
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater 35.70 39.00 3.29 9.2% 2.57 2.70 0.13 5.1%
COMMERCL.\LRATES
Current Proposed Dollar
Base Charge Base Charge Increase
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial 1 " to 2" Meter
Commercial 3" Meter
Commercial 4" Meter
Commercial 6" Meter
Commercial 8" Meter or Greater
$
8.93 $
35.70
126.00
2,100.00
3,150.00
4,200.00
9.75
39.00
140.00
2,300.00
3,450.00
4,600.00
$ 0.82
3.30
14.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
%
Increase
/Curr~n~ Proposed Dollar
Volumetric Volumetric Increase
%
Increase
9.2%
9.2%.
, ,
11.1%;:.\
~.5r/ ',,)
,9,5%
"'.' ~
"'.,9.5% . \
,~' , <\,' ,..<>-<)
" ',/ /
" \
\, '\
" '\
s', \,).57 $
'2.10
. ^
2.10, ./)
2.10 ',./
2.10/
2.10
$ 0.13
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
2.70
2.21
2.21
2.21
2.21
2.21
r
, ,
'. '\', // /'
....
WASTEWATER RATES
.I /
1\, .......~ ....,.....
"",/ ". \ .........,....., "',
\ ,/ /f'...-....~.....J-)
., ;',.' .........;"
.., \ // ;,1' ,." ;1/
'. '\,' I I ;'
. \ '// "../
RESIDENTIAL RATES
//
j
~',
Current . P,roposed \ Dollar. \ ,.. %
Base Charge / Base Charge Increase \.Increase
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential 1" Meter or Greater
, .
/' ., " ,: ; ,.' /
:1','\ ,'~""",,-......,-,.....
7 .98 $... / ~.OO - $ ----1.02
38.33 \_/,42.00 3.67
\
, ,
, ",/)
$
/".---...,-
,I /,....,.--..""-. '_,
,./'// '-, ,:" \,
./ ,/
COMMERCIAL RUES
:P. \.
'. \.
. "
~
'\\
Currept / ~roposed Dollar
Base Charge / Base Charge Increase
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial 1" to 2" Meter
Commercial Larger than 2" Meter
... " I'
;' ,/
1 L13 $
38.33
72.45
12.00 $ 0.87
42.00 3.67
84.00 11.55
$
Page 1 of 1
Current Proposed Dollar
Volumetric Volumetric Increase
%
Increase
12.7%
9.6%
$
3.47 $
3.47
3.64 $ 0.17
3.64 0.17
%
Increase
Current Proposed Dollar
Volumetric Volumetric Increase
7.8%
9.6%
15.9%
$
3.62 $
3.62
3.62
3.80 $ 0.18
3.80 0.18
3.80 0.18
5.1%
5.2%
5.2%
5.2%
5.2%
5.2%
4.9%
4.9%
%
Increase
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
RECOVERY THROUGH 25% MINIMUM BILL /750/0 VOLUMETRIC
WATER RATES
Table D-5
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater
Cost of Service Study
RESIDENTIAL RATES
Current Proposed Dollar % Current Proposed Dollar %
Base Charge Base Charge Increase Increase Volumetric Volumetric Increase Increase
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less $ 7.35 $ 7.74 $ 0.39 5.2% $ 2.57 $ 2.76 $ 0.19 7.4%
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater 35.70 37.63 1.93 5.4% 2.57 2.76 0.19 7.4%
COMMERCIAL RATES
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial 1 " to 2" Meter
Commercial 3" Meter
Commercial 4" Meter
Commercial 6" Meter
Commercial 8" Meter or Greater
RESIDENTIAL RATES
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential 1" Meter or Greater
COMMERCIAL RATES
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial 1 " to 2" Meter
Commercial Larger than 2" Meter
Current Proposed Dollar
Base Charge Base Charge Increase
%
Increase
$
8.93 - $
35.70
126.00
2,100.00
3,150.00
4,200.00
9.32 $
37.28
130.73
2,257.50
3,386.25
4,515.00
0.39
1.58
4.72
157.50
236.25
315.00
4.3%
4.4% ,'~,
3.8%//'>,
/ .
7.5%
,7.5%
',,'7.5%'"
.~~ '\.~ '/"/'" \\
'\// '-'
'\
/ \
Current Proposed Dollar %
'Volum'etric Volumetric Increase Increase
,/ \,',
/ \'\
,'\ $\\\ 2.57 $
,\ \'2.10
.J 2~ 10 .'. /
I I
2.10,/
. /
2.10
2.10
\
\
WASTEWATER RATES '\,../
,/ ,,/ ,\ '~.,",
::./ \ " ..........
.\ ,/),~r,
//,./ ..,...... '" ,/
"... ,/./
. \/',/,1
, I
..----- '
Current .~roposed, Dollar',... %
Base Charge "Base Charge Increase'" Increase
$
.... ;'\,\.
7.98 $\
38.33
~-.....
.<~"':""
{/ // ..... \'\,
/' ,I
.i/
$
I:
I ( ,
I'~ _"
8.50-$~?2
.40.93 2.60
\, '-,
" /
~' /1
,
,
6.5%
6.8%
2.76
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
$ 0.19
0.16
0.16
0.16
0.16
0.16
7.5%
7.5%
7.5%
7.5%
7.5%
7.5%
Current Proposed Dollar
Volumetric Volumetric Increase
%
Increase
$
3.47 $
3.47
3.73 $ 0.26
3.73 0.26
7.5%
7.5%
.'oJ'/
: ......\ \\ \ \
\'\, ::
\. \ " !
Current , Proposed
. ., I I
Base Charge 'Base Charge
.......;/
" /
11:13 $
38.33
72.45
Dollar % Current Proposed Dollar %
Increase Increase Volumetric Volumetric Increase Increase
$ 0.54 4.9% $ 3.62 $ 3.89 $ 0.27 7.5%
2.72 7.1% 3.62 3.89 0.27 7.5%
5.43 7.5% 3.62 3.89 0.27 7.5%
11.67
41.05
77.88
Page I of I
RECOVERY THROUGH 00/0 MINIMUM BILL / 1000/0 VOLUMETRIC
Table D.6
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater
Cost of Service Study
WATER RATES
RESIDENTl~L RUES
Current Proposed Dollar % Current Proposed Dollar %
Base Charge Base Charge Increase Increase Volumetric Volumetric Increase Increase
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less $ 7,35 $ 7,35 S 0.0% $ 2,57 $ 2,83 $ 0,26 10,1%
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater 35.70 35.70 0,0% 2,57 2,83 0.26 10,1%
COMMERCIAL RATES
Current Proposed Dollar
Base Charge Base Charge Increase
. Current Proposed Dollar
Volumetric Volumetric Increase
%
Increase
/\\
/ \ "
<' $ \\ 2.57 $
. " \
\\\2.10
, j 2,10,/>'
2.10/
2JO'
2,10
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less $ 8.93 ~$ 8.93 $
Commercial 1" to 2" Meter 35.70 35.70
Commercial 3" Meter 126.00 126,00
Commercial 4" Meter 2,100.00 2,100.00
Commercial 6" Meter 3,150.00 3,150,00
Commercial 8" Meter or Greater 4,200,00 4,200,00
0.0%
0.0% , ,
0,0%'>\:'\
0.0%/ "'-'
/o,6~1o
/' I,: 0 ("..~.
i /' 0.0 Yo, '.
'"-"I '--.....\ /~l/...\..\
\ \',1/ // v
,/
\,,\
, t/"'J
WASTEWATER RATES ""v//
2.83 $
2.31
2.31
2.31
2,31
2,31
RESIDENTIAL RATES
/ / \ \ ..........."................
-:_1 / ", \ .'......~ .............
, \ //......................."./...\
\\<;.:~/ ~'>:/
. ,
../
.-----,
Current . Proposed\ Dollar " %
Base Charge,' Base Charge Increase \.Increase
Current Proposed Dollar
Volumetric Volumetric Increase
%
Increase
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater
,/'>, _', ,:' / ,/ /,1'
7,98 ' $''.7.98- f--....<;v 0,0%
\ .. ------ ,
38,33 " '{ 38,33 . 0.0%
3,82 $ 0,35
3.82 0.35
$
$
3.47 $
3.47
'/;~;:~'..,.,
/ /'
..
\, .....
\/"
I
COMMERCIAL RATES
/ /
, I
,. (
/ /\ \,
'-' . \
. \
'\'\
%
Increase
0,26
0.21
0.21
0.21
0,21
0.21
10.1%
10,0%
10.0%
10,0%
10.0%
10,0%
10.1%
10.1%
, .
\ \ !
' \
Current i ~roposed Dollar % Current Proposed Dollar %
Base Charge/ Base Charge Increase Increase Volumetric Volumetric Increase Increase
'\" ,/
/ / $ $ 0,36 9,9%
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less $ 11.13 $ 11.13 $ 0,0% $ 3,62 3,98
Commercial 1" to 2" Meter 38.33 38.33 0,0% 3.62 3.98 0.36 9,9%
Commercial Larger than 2" Meter 72.45 72.45 0,0% 3,62 3.98 0,36 9,9%
Page 1 of 1
',I
, ,I
RECOVERY THROUGH CHANGING MINIMUM BILL VOLUMES
Table D-7
City of Paris, Texas
Water and Wastewater
Cost of Service Study
WATER RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES
Current Proposed Current
Base Volume Base Volume Volumetric
Monthly
Increase
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater
200
1,000
100 $
500
2.57 $ 2.57
2.57 12.85
,/"\, \
/
/
COMMERCIAL RATES
/1 ....~'\. \\
/1 \.. \\
\
"
" \,
. "'" '...\j
Current Proposed// Current
I' -'
Base Volume Base Volume / Volumetric
, \
" \
",'\ .....
Monthli
Increase
. / (~\
/Il....:\ '., \.
, I .. , "
- 100\$/\~' 2.57
. ,,/ ,/
500 , 2.10
" /-'j
3,000 -', 1,500 "" / ,2.10
...... ' '~ I
1 00 00 I ~:,..... ''-.... 7 0 '.. /' 2 10
, 0 '/ \ .....'< ,5, 00 //.
I I \ '. '-....,......... .i
150,000 '\ 112;500.....,/>, 2.10
, " ........... - ;
200,000 \150,000/// 2.10
/.--, , " :<(./
.,' ./-..... II
~// \ \
/
(/ </
200
1,000
$ 2.57
10.50
31.50
525.00
787.50
1,050.00
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial 1" to 2" Meter
Commercial 3" Meter
Commercial 4" Meter
Commercial 6" Meter
Commercial 8" Meter or Greater
I,
\ /';
, \/,'
,. ../
,--.......
",~-"'.......'"
"
RESIDENTIAL RATES
,/
,. /\ \
'J '-" \.,'.
", \.
I, \
\ Current Proposed Current
\" Base Volume Base Volume Volumetric
Monthly
Increase
/
:~ /
200
1,000
100 $
500
3.47 $ 3.47
3.47 17.35
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential 1 " Meter or Greater
COMMERCIAL RATES
Current Proposed Current Monthly
Base Volume Base Volume Volumetric Increase
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less 200 100 $ 3.62 $ 3.62
Commercial 1" to 2" Meter 1,000 500 3.62 18.10
Commercial Larger than 2" Meter 2,000 1,000 3.62 36.20
Page 1 of 1
Dlrector of Finine;
WATER AND WASTEWATER
COST OF SERVICE.AND
. RATE DESIGN STUDY
"
. '.City of Paris, Texas
. Draft Report
May 2005
n'W~t(K