1998-124-RES WHEREAS, CITY COUNCIL DID HERETOFORE ON THE 16TH DAY
RESOLUTION NO. 98-124
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris did heretofore, on the 16th day of
August, 1997, in Resolution No. 98-121, authorize the execution of the Compromise Settlement
& Release of All Claims, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, in Cause No. 64933,
styled The City of Reno, Texas vs. The City of Paris, Texas; and,
WHEREAS, it is deemed appropriate that such execution be ratified and that the
Agreement Apportioning Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Overlap, dated October 8, 1984, be
amended; and,
WHEREAS, the form of the Amendments to the Agreement Apportioning Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction Overlap, dated October 8, 1984, Between the City of Paris and the City of Reno,
attached hereto as Exhibit B, should, in all things, be approved, and the Mayor Pro Tern, Jerry
L. Thomas, should be authorized to execute the same; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, that the
execution on August 16, 1998, by the Mayor, Charles H. Neeley, of the Compromise Settlement
& Release of All Claims, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, be, and the same is
hereby, ratified; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the form of the Amendments to the Agreement
Apportioning Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Overlap, dated October 8, 1984, Between the City of
Paris and the City of Reno, attached hereto as Exhibit B, be, and the same is hereby, approved;
and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor Pro Tern, Jerry L. Thomas, be, and he
is hereby, authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City of the Paris, the Amendments
to the Agreement Apportioning Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Overlap, dated October 8, 1984,
Between the City of Paris and the City of Reno, under the terms and conditions and in the form
shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of August, 1998.
~
f "7
mas, Mayor Pro Tern
ATTEST:
.~
~~~
Mattie Cunningham, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO .~ORM:
~/
Scott P. Foster, City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 98-121
WHEREAS, a settlement has been negotiated in Cause No.64933, styled The City of
Reno, Texas vs. The City of Paris, Texas; and,
WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interests of the citizens of the City of Paris that
such settlement be approved; and,
WHEREAS, the form of the Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims, attached
hereto as Exhibit A, should, in all things, be approved, and the Mayor, Charles H. Neeley, should
be authorized to execute the same; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, that the
settlement of Cause No.64933, styled The City of Reno, Texas vs. The City of Paris, Texas, be,
and the same is hereby, approved; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor, Charles H. Neeley, be, and he is
hereby, authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City of Paris, the Compromise
Settlement & Release of All Claims, under the terms and conditions and in the form shown in
Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of August, 1998.
Charles H. Neeley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas E. Haynes, Assistant City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott P. Foster, City Attorney
EXHIBIT A
AMENDMENTS TO
THE AGREEMENT APPORTIONING
EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OVERLAP,
DATED OCTOBER 8,1984,
BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARIS AND THE CITY OF RENO
That it is agreed by and between the City of Reno, Texas (hereinafter called "RENO"), and
the City of Paris, Texas (hereinafter called "PARIS"), as follows:
For and in consideration of the undertakings of each party hereto which is deemed to be a
valid and sufficient consideration to support this agreement, the Agreement entitled AGREEMENT
APPORTIONING EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OVERLAP (hereinafter called "the
1984 Agreement") and dated October 8, 1984, shall be amended as follows:
A. Paragraph 1 (d) shall be deleted;
B. Paragraph 3 shall be amended to read as follows: "There is attached hereto as Exhibit
'A' a Plat prepared by the city staff of PARIS reflecting and depicting the
apportionment. In the event of a conflict between the specific descriptions (whether
by metes and bounds or by distance from a known point or line) and the Plat attached
hereto, the specific descriptions of this Contract and the location of respective
reference points shall contro1.";
C. Paragraph 5 shall be amended by the addition of the following sentence: "Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, RENO expressly consents to, ratifies,
confirms, and validates those annexations by PARIS which are set out in Exhibit
'c,'" The 1984 Agreement shall be amended by attachment of Exhibit "C.";
D. Paragraph 6 shall be amended by the deletion of the first sentence and modifying the
remainder to read as follows: "The parties have specifically agreed that all areas
shown on Exhibit 'A' as lying within RENO's extraterritorial jurisdiction are
apportioned to RENO, but further understand and agree that the parties cannot, by the
Agreement, confer upon RENO extraterritorial jurisdiction beyond that conferred
upon RENO by the Legislature of the State of Texas. Accordingly, the parties
express their consensus that RENO should have the future right to expand, if
necessary, within the area apportioned to RENO in Exhibit "A". PARIS agrees that
its City Council will consent to properly supported requests for annexation of
properties lying within the area apportioned to RENO in Exhibit "A".even though
such property may be within PARIS's extraterritorial jurisdiction.
E. Paragraph 7 shall be added to read as follows: "In the event of a conflict between
descriptions of previously annexed areas by either City and the areas described on
Exhibits 'B' or 'C,' the descriptions in Exhibits 'B' or 'C,' respectively, shall
Ex),,;.'! r TD lvl(ek-tli'r f
~
EXHIBIT B
control. "
F. The 1984 Agreement shall be amended by the attachment of a new, updated, Exhibit
"B" and a map of the city limits of the City of RENO.
WITNESS OUR HANDS this 17th day of August, 1998.
~ ~/4~
Mayor for the City of RENO
ADM ~~/rvtCUL
Attest: City Secretary for the City of RENO
WITNESS OUR HANDS this 17th day of August, 1998.
,,/
,
.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
^
~~LJ
Attorney for the City of PARIS
EXHIBIT C
ANNEXATION HISTORY FOR
THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS
a. Original Incorporation, 1905 Charter
b. Amended boundaries, 1948 Charter
c. Ordinance No. 1198, passed and adopted on September 12, 1949
d. Ordinance No. 1225, passed and adopted on August 14, 1950
e. Ordinance No. 1227, passed and adopted on December 11, 1950
f. Ordinance No. 1238, passed and adopted on May 14, 1951
g. Ordinance No. 1311, passed and adopted on February 5, 1954
h. Ordinance No. 1321, passed and adopted on May 3, 1954
i. Ordinance No. 1345, passed and adopted on May 14, 1955
j. Ordinance No. 1389, passed and adopted on December 10, 1956
k. Ordinance No. 1496, passed and adopted on November 9, 1959
1. Ordinance No. 1497, passed and adopted on November 9, 1959
m. Ordinance No. 1498, passed and adopted on December 14, 1959
n. Ordinance No. 1542, passed and adopted on May 8, 1961
o. Ordinance No. 1543, passed and adopted on May 8, 1961
p. Ordinance No. 1569, passed and adopted on November 13, 1961
q. Ordinance No. 1606, passed and adopted on October 15, 1962
r. Ordinance No. 1617, passed and adopted on February 11, 1963
s. Ordinance No. 1666, passed and adopted on April 13, 1964
1. Ordinance No. 1739, passed and adopted on August 9, 1965
u. Ordinance No. 1768, passed and adopted on January 24, 1966
v. Ordinance No. 1785, passed and adopted on May 23, 1966
w. Ordinance No. 1787, passed and adopted on June 27, 1966
x. Ordinance No. 1789, passed and adopted on July 11, 1966
y. Ordinance No. 1816, passed and adopted on February 3, 1967
z. Ordinance No. 1827, passed and adopted on May 8, 1967
aa. Ordinance No. 1964, passed and adopted on May 11, 1970
bb. Ordinance No. 2034, passed and adopted on July 12, 1971
cc. Ordinance No. 2064, passed and adopted on December 13, 1971
dd. Ordinance No. 2065, passed and adopted on December 13, 1971
ee. Ordinance No. 2119, passed and adopted on November 20, 1972
ff. Ordinance No. 2162, passed and adopted on August 13, 1973
gg. Ordinance No. 2169, passed and adopted on December 10, 1973
hh. Ordinance No. 2208, passed and adopted on January 13,1975
ii. Ordinance No. 2238, passed and adopted on August 11,1975
jj. - Ordinance No. 2267, passed and adopted on December 8,1975
kk. Ordinance No. 2293, passed and adopted on July 12,1976
11. Ordinance No. 2308, passed and adopted on December 13,1976
Page I of 2
mm. Ordinance No. 2323, passed and adopted on April 11,1977
nn. Ordinance No. 2335, passed and adopted on June 23,1977
00. Ordinance No. 2369, passed and adopted on December 30,1977
pp. Ordinance No. 2414, passed and adopted on December 29,1980
qq. Ordinance No. 2551, passed and adopted on December 29, 1980
rr. Ordinance No. 2630, passed and adopted on May 10, 1982
ss. Ordinance No. 2650, passed and adopted on September 13, 1982
tt. Ordinance No. 83-069, passed and adopted on November 14, 1983
uu. Ordinance No. 83-075, passed and adopted on December 12, 1983
VV. Ordinance No. 84-032, passed and adopted on May 14, 1984
ww. Ordinance No. 84-050, passed and adopted on July 30, 1984
xx. Ordinance No. 85-011, passed and adopted on March 11, 1985
yy. Ordinance No. 85-040, passed and adopted on July 8, 1985
ZZ. Ordinance No. 87-060, passed and adopted on October 19, 1987
aaa. Ordinance No. 87-084, passed and adopted on December 14, 1987
bbb. Ordinance No. 88-055, passed and adopted on December 19, 1988
ccc. Ordinance No. 91-043, passed and adopted on August 12, 1991
ddd. Ordinance No. 91-044, passed and adopted on August 12, 1991
eee. Ordinance No. 93-024, passed and adopted on June 14, 1993
fff. Ordinance No. 93-044, passed and adopted on September 13, 1993
ggg. Ordinance No. 95-007, passed and adopted on January 9, 1995
hhh. Ordinance No. 96-001, passed and adopted on January 2, 1996
iii. Ordinance No. 96-042, passed and adopted on August 9, 1996
JJJ. Ordinance No. 97-044, passed and adopted on September 8, 1997
kkk. Ordinance No. 97-059, passed and adopted on December 15, 1997
Page 2 of 2
CAUSE NO. 64933
THE CITY OF RENO, TEXAS
~
~
~
~
~
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
VS.
OF LAMAR COUNTY, TEXAS
THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
62ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT & RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That it is agreed by and between City of Reno, Texas, PLAINTIFF (hereinafter called
"RENO"), and the RELEASED PARTY identified as the City of Paris, Texas, DEFENDANT
(hereinafter called "PARIS"), and its past, present, and future officers, elected officials, employees,
agents, and attorneys (all in both their official and individual capacities), and their respective
insurers, and those in privity with any of them, as follows:
F or and in consideration of the undertakings of each party hereto which is deemed to be a
valid and sufficient consideration to support this agreement, the parties agree to resolve all disputes
between them in this proceeding as follows:
1. The Agreement Apportioning Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Overlap (hereinafter called "the
1984 Agreement"), dated October 8, 1984, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "2,"
between them shall be amended as follows:
A. Paragraph 1 (d) shall be deleted;
B. Paragraph 3 shall be amended to read as follows: "There is attached hereto as Exhibit
"A," a Plat prepared by the city staff of PARIS reflecting and depicting the
apportionment. In the event of a conflict between the specific descriptions (whether
by metes and bounds or by distance from a known point or line) and the Plat attached
hereto, the specific descriptions of this Contract and the location of respective
reference points shall control.";
C. Paragraph 5 shall be amended by the addition of the following sentence: "Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, RENO expressly consents to , ratifies,
confirms, and validates those annexations by PARIS which are set out in Exhibit
"C," attached hereto.";
D. Paragraph 6 shall be amended by the deletion of the first sentence and modifying the
remainder to read as follows: "The parties have specifically agreed that all areas
shown on Exhibit "A" as lying within RENO's extraterritorial jurisdiction are
apportioned to RENO, but further understand and agree that the parties cannot, by the
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims - Page 1
E y. h / '6 I t II 1J J J) lIe h1 en r
Agreement, confer upon RENO extraterritorial jurisdiction beyond that conferred
upon RENO by the Legislature of the State of Texas. Accordingly, the parties. . . in
the future.";
E. Paragraph 7 shall be added to read as follows: "In the event of a conflict between
descriptions of previously annexed areas by either City and the areas described on
Exhibits "B" or "C," the descriptions on Exhibits "B" or "e," respectively, shall
contro1."
F. The 1984 Agreement shall be amended by the attachment of a new, updated, Exhibit
"B" and a map of the city limits of the City of RENO.
2. A. The City of Paris's Ordinance No. 97-059 shall be effective as of the date of its
adoption in accordance with its terms, subject to the following:
Notwithstanding any provision contained therein or in applicable law, landowners
whose property is contiguous to RENO's present city limit line (or contiguous to
property which is contiguous to RENO's present city limit line and the owner of
which has also petitioned as set out below) in the following areas:
i. that portion of Tract 12 which can be served by gravity flow into the existing
RENO wastewater collection system. Exhibit "1," attached hereto, which is
a plat of the areas annexed by PARIS by said Ordinance reflects the area of
Tract 12 described by shading in yellow;
11. that portion of Tract 7 lying one thousand (1000) feet, or more, south of the
centerline of U.S. Highway 82 that can be served by gravity flow into the
existing RENO wastewater collection system. The portion of Tract 7 to
which reference is made is a part of the areas that is shaded yellow on Exhibit
"I'" and
,
lll. that portion of Tract 8 lying north of Smallwood Road and east of the line
defining the area that can be served by gravity flow into the existing RENO
wastewater collection system. The portion of Tract 8 to which reference is
made is a part of the area that is shaded yellow on Exhibit" 1";
may petition the City Council of the City of Paris, prior to December 1, 1998, for
disannexation from the City of Paris and simultaneously petition the City of Reno for
annexation. Such petitions shall be granted by the City Council of PARIS at its first
Council Meeting in December 1998. Annexation proceedings on such tracts shall be
completed by the City Council of RENO prior to April 1, 1999, and, if not
completed, or if any of such tracts so annexed are subsequently disannexed, they shall
again become subject to the extraterritorial jurisdiction of PARIS.
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims. Page 2
B. In no case shall PARIS be required to disannex, in addition to land belonging to a
petitioner as described above, additional adjacent or contiguous land by reason of a
statutory requirement now existing or to be enacted, such as Texas Local
Government Code, Sec. 43.147. PARIS shall not be required to consent to a
disannexation request if it results in a landowner who does not wish to be disannexed
and annexed into RENO being landlocked, meaning completely surrounded by
RENO.
C. If, by reason of an approved annexation, a landowner cannot be conveniently served
by PARIS sewer or water service, without PARIS service lines crossing property in
RENO or streets of RENO, then the RENO Council shall approve such person
hooking up to the RENO sewer and/or water system as applicable at a rate of no more
than three (3) times that charged to residents within RENO city limits.
3. Whether an area may be "served by gravity flow" shall mean that area on RENO's side of
the naturally occurring ridge line or dividing line in the natural contour such that sewer
service could be provided without new lift stations or pumps to one of RENO's now existing
lift stations or sewage treatment plant. Determination of such area shall initially be made by
RENO's engineer, KSA Engineers, Inc., based upon the plat prepared for RENO in this case
(which depicts such areas in yellow). In the event of a dispute between the parties as to
location of any area, it shall be determined by the PARIS City Engineer and Mr. Foster and
a third engineer acceptable to both parties. The decision of the three (3) engineers shall be
binding on all parties. In the event the parties cannot agree on the third engineer, the Judge
of the 62nd Judicial Court shall appoint a third engineer whose fee and expenses in the
matter shall be divided evenly between RENO and PARIS.
4. A. PARIS shall agree that for a period of seven (7) years from and after the date hereof
it will not undertake any annexation proceedings in the following described area:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the centerline of County
Road 42600 (also known as Pine Mill Road) and RENO's
apportioned extraterritorial jurisdiction as shown on Exhibit "A,"
attached to the 1984 Agreement;
THENCE easterly with said centerline to its intersection with
Sun Valley's extraterritorial jurisdiction line, thence northeasterly and
easterly with Sun Valley's extraterritorial jurisdiction line to its
intersection with the centerline of County Road 42600;
THENCE easterly to its intersection to the east right of way
line ofF.M. Highway 196;
THENCE northerly with said east right of way line to a point
being 1.5 mile south of F.M. Highway 195, thence southwesterly
along a line 1.5 mile south of and parallel to said centerline of F .M.
Highway 195 to its intersection with RENO's apportioned
extraterritorial jurisdiction as shown on Exhibit "A," attached to the
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims. Page 3
1984 Agreement;
THENCE Southerly and easterly with said apportioned
extraterritorial jurisdiction line to the place of beginning.
B. During such period, PARIS shall not oppose on the grounds that area is within the
extraterritorial jurisdiction of PARIS, and its City Council shall consent to, if
necessary, annexations by RENO within the defined area which otherwise comply
with applicable statutes, even if the area to be annexed is, at that time, within
PARIS's extraterritorial jurisdiction. The defined area is shaded in green on the
attached Exhibit "1."
5. The Parties each understand and agree that the conditions given under this agreement are in
full satisfaction of all injuries and damages arising on account of the above-described events
and that they will receive no further sums of money therefrom. RENO agrees to not assert
or prosecute any further claims or lawsuits therefore against anyone whomsoever, whether
or not herein or otherwise named, described or identified. Any and all claims against parties
not specifically released herein, if any, are hereby assigned in full to the parties hereby
released.
6. RENO and PARIS hereby represent and warrant to each other and to the Court that no
promises, representations, or agreements not set out herein have been made to them; that this
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims is executed without reliance upon any
statement or representation of any person or parties released or their representatives,
concerning the nature and extent of the injuries, damages, and/or legal liability therefor; that
acceptance of the consideration set forth herein is a full accord and satisfaction of a disputed
claim, which is expressly denied; and that this Compromise Settlement & Release of All
Claims is made of their own free will and accord after consulting with and acting upon the
advice of their attorneys.
7. For the same consideration, it is agreed that an agreed judgment will be approved and entered
in the above-styled suit and that costs of court, including attorneys' fees, will be taxed to the
party incurring the same.
8. Although originally drafted by attorneys for the RELEASED PARTIES, this Compromise
Settlement & Release of all Claims is a contract which is the product of negotiations between
the parties and attorneys for the parties and which shall, in the event of any dispute over its
meaning or application, be interpreted fairly and reasonably, and neither more strongly for
or against either party. This document contains the entire agreement of the parties hereto.
9. The City Councils of RENO and PARIS have held special sessions in their respective Cities
and have authorized this Compromise Settlement & Release of all Claims as shown by the
signatures of their authorized agents below.
THE PROVISIONS OF THIS COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT & RELEASE OF ALL
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims - Page 4
CLAIMS ARE CONTRACTUAL AND NOT MERE RECITALS.
WITNESS OUR HANDS this 16th day of August, 1998.
-fi~~=
Mayor for the Ity of RENO
b'(Akia ~
0/
Attest: City Secretary (or the City of RENO
WITNESS OUR HANDS this 16th day of August, 1998.
Attest: City Clerk for the 9ty ofP~ ;', ,
. \\,... ;
" ,
, I \'
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
, I,
\
,I
\', 1
,
,
'i' ,1
I "',
I'
:, ~
, '
r I '\ ",'
1 ,
. -' ,~'....~~..
I ". ~t ,~ 06 ~ !
~ I ~ '
4 ~'
_.....iI
~~~
Attorney for the City of PARIS
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims - Page 5
, "
.......
(. " "
"...-,,'
( .' .
" .
'-
'. ",
,- """
"." '.
, ,
, "....
i' ",' '~'., '..
\ .:: ,'....:. "'.'
'.. .
. '. ~ ' . .
~ . ".: :.: ': ':" :..':. ,:-:':: ~.:: , '":',
.' ,",."
. ,. ",f
",",
,',",'" "
. .
'.,
",'
ACREEHENT APPOR'1'lONING F.XTRATEP,Rl'l'ORIAL
JURISDICTION OVEP.LAP
This Agreement macle (tnd entered into hetween the CITY
OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS,' tI m\lnicipnl corporntioh, acti.nl~ by
and through its Mayor, Joe Graham, ~uly authorized by
Resolution of its City Council, attested by its City Clerk,
II. C. Greene, and approved it:; to form by it:~; City At torney,
T. K. Haynes, hereafter called PARIS, and the CITY OF RENO,
TEXAS, ~cting herein by Dnd throuch itn Mayor, attested by
its City Sel~rcitnry, both officers bri.ng 1I1.1thorlzed to act in
the piemises by Ordinnnce or it~ City CommissiDn duly
nd(lpted, hereafter en lled RENO, I.1gn'e thnt' tlw following
facts exist and arc true:
]. The City of PARIS i.s ~l 11011I(\ rll]p eLl': "~l1til.led to
:m ext'rilti~rritori,ll' j\lri~<1ir.ti.on c()n~i.!:tiJlI~ of :Ill tll{'
contiguous unincorporated ar~n not ~ p~rt of nny other city,
within two (2.0) mile::: of its corponlte lirldts undp.r the
provisions of Article 970n, n~ umended, Revised Civil
Statutes of Texas, the Municipnl Annexation Act, hereafter
called Act.
2. The City of RENO, Texas, is n general lnw city and
is en'titled to an extraterritori.nl jurisdiction consi.sting
of nIl the contiguous unincorporated area, not a pnrt of any
,
i
other city, within one-half (0.5) mile of it~ corporate
limi t r. under the At' t.
3. PARIS ilnd RENO ilrc 1l:i.tu:ltl'd within 5urh proximity
to one :l\lother tlwt their !Jtntut.f'I'v extrntllrritClJ:ial'\uris-
J .
, .
dictions overlnp one another.
4. PARIS tmd RENO nH~ogni~(! thil t: the appn!"l':ionlnm\t 1)[
the ex~raterr:ltori[\l jUrl!ldiction o'1L!rlnp bet:\"een tlw t\'10
c.iti'es would be difficult because to do so would involve 1I
determinntion of the respective populntions of ench city on
September 1,1963, the effective d"l:r. of the Actj incrcwsC!:
in population of each dty, if f,t1ch increar.er. r"i!led the
','
EXHIBIT 2
"
';
"
......'..
,.
',,' .
~ "
,", ',' """'.
.'
\ , '
, ......,' '"
. ....
.. "
"
, "
'.',','
(. ' ',..
, ,
<'
.,' ,
c'
"
"
population limits of the city to a different entitlement
tinder the Act; the sequence nnd vnlidity of pnnexntions of
property to each city and the effect of such nnn~xations to
the expansion of the extrntcrritorinl jurisdiction of each
city; :md th~ proper method of rc!:olution of nny resulting
overlap under the terms and provisions of the Act nnd
specifically Section JB thereof.
5. Both PARIS and RENO have nnnexed territory within
thc extraterritorial juri:;dictioll ef the other Hithout the
\-Tritton consent of the other, cre:u:ing confli.c:t:s tmder the
terms of the Act, whi.ch should be resolved.
6. The respective City Council and City Commission of
PARIS and RENO, actinf~ through their city staffs, have
reached agrpcment CIS to the ,~pp(lrt.ionm(lnt of the confli,cts
:md overlays in their c:<tratcrritOrllll jllritJdi,c~ion which
thC!y desire to reduce to \vriting, thereby resolving such
conflict and providing guidance for the nnnexations of each
party hereto in the future.
NOW, THEREFORE I KNOW ALL I-IEN BY THESE PRESENTS, thll t
the CITY OF PARIS and the CITY OF RENO, TEXAS, in considern-
tion of the premises nnd tile desire C'f: their respective
governing bocli.cn to resolve all conflicts in p.xtra-
territorial jurisdiction between tl)(~m uo hr.rr.by contrnct nnd
agree ns foflows:
1. There is [Ipportioncd to RENO thc! follo~!i.ng overlaps
in extraterritorinl jurisdiction between the pnrti.cs:
(n) A trllct of lund cOll'mencing at the
intersection of the enst boundary line
of F. N. 'Highwny 1508 llnd the south
boundnry line DC the Hissouri-P~cific
Railroad right-of-way llnd thence ~nst
with said south rnilroad right-or-way
linr. 500 feet tn il poi.nt j thence r.outh
pnrnllel with the cast right-of-way line
of F. N. Highway 150B to II point of
intersection with tht'! corporate limi.ts
of the City of {'nris on th0 north side
of Cox Airport; thence wrst 500 feet to
the ellst boundnry linr of F. M. HighwllY
1508;,. thence north \~.ith sni.c1 ennt
right'-o(-wny lill(~ of Ji'. M. Higl1\"ay 1508
to the point of beginring.
','
. ,".
" .,'.,.
. ',:
I,
"
.: .
"
".. . ......
,""
('. .
.V', .
. ",
(b) A tract of Innd beginning at the inter-
section of an extension of the east.
boundary line of 6 N. E. south across
. Highway 82 East to r.aid 'highwllYs south
. boundary line beginning at th;! t point
thence south to the north boundnry line
of the Hissouri-Pncifi.c R:d.lrond rif"ht-
of-way; thence \-lest \-lith said north
ri.nht-of-wIlY line 150 feet to the east
corporate limits of the City of Reno;
thence north to the south right-of-\-/ny
line of U. S. lIigh\iny 82; thence east
with said south ri~~ht-of-way of U. S.
lIigh\oH1Y 82 to the point of bcginninl~.
. .'.:'
(c). Beginning at a point in the \-lest
boundary line of 13th Street S.W. (Reno)
at its i.ntenlccti.on \-lith the r.o\lthern
most corporate limits of Reno as it
prcllcntly exists; thence west 150 'feet
with said south corporate limit line of
Reno to a potntl thence south to th(~
north boundary line of Old Clnr\r.sville
Road; thence enst npproximntely 150 feet
with the north boundary line of. Old
Clnrksville Rond to its intersection
with the west boundary line of 13th
Street S.H.; thence nor'eh with the \olellt
boundary line of 13th Street S.W. to th~
plncc of beginning.
(d) All of the conflicting extraterritorial
jurisdiction of the parties fro~ the
north boundnry line of U. S. High\-lay 82
in a northwesterly direction to the
intersection of the agreed service line
between Paris nnd Reno extended from its
present terminu~ north of Reno to the
northwest in the same course.
',,",
',',.." ..
..... .
. t',
....:.... .:...:>"
,',".
I.
..
2. All other ovcrJ.:Jps and extrntcrritori.nl jurisdic-
tion hettieen the parties hereto :tIe apportioned to PARIS
subject to the follotdne provisi.ons of this subpnragraph:
. .
,'.", .
.
(ri) The are:! designated "ArCH A" on the Pint
attached hereto ns nil Exhibit <15 set out in
rara~raph 3 hereof' sholl b~ considered within
the ~xtratcrritorinl jurisdiction of the City
of PARIS; howcvcr~ it i~ exprrssly n~recJ ~nrl
lInden;to()11 that the City CO\lllci] of thl! Ci.ty
of PARIS wi 1.1 C'lltl'rt,,:i.1l ilnd [:lVOl..,b ty
cond,der cedillC An~:J A or iI part thereof to
the extrnterritori{ll jllri.:lllicLiOIl or thc-' City
o[ RENO [or annexation by the City of RENO
upon receipt of a request from the property
owner of the land included within Area A for
annexation to the City of RENO, nccompnnied
by tl development pl:m acceptable to the City
Council of the City of PARIS.
, ",
I
.(::....
.',.
'.f
", .
. . "
.. .
f..' ,
(.
""'f '"
.',,'.. ,
.....,'
i :' '"
, ,,'
" ,.
"
"
"
.' ,
3. There is attached hereto 05 Exhibit A, n PI~t
prepared by the city stnff of PARIS reflecting and'depicting
,'., .',"
" ,
the apportionment set out in paragraphs 1 and l hereof for
illustrative pl.1rposes~ In the event of eonflict between the
recitations of this Contract and the Plat attached hereto,
I
the recitations (If thi.s Contract :lI1d the loc:Jti.on of the
respec~ive reference points shall control,
/'
:;
4. PARIS hereby expressly consents to each and every
annexation made by RENO, prior to the dote hereof of land or
territory within the extroterritorinl jurisdiction of PARIS.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, PARIS
expressly consents to, ratifies, confirms and validates
.,u . .
those annexations hy RENO Hhi.eh are set out on Exhihi t "nil
attached hereto,
5... RENO hereby expressly consent5 to each nnd every
annexation mnde by PARIS prior to the dote hereof of land or
territory within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of RENO.
6. The parties hereto expressly v~ree by and bet\-1een
themselves that it is recognized that n mnterinl consid-
.....
eration for the approval of this Plat by RENO is the under-
standing aT1d agreement reac11cd between the parties that the
area available to RENO for expansion in the future after the
development of its present extraterritorial jurisdiction
.',' '"
should 1bgical1y lie between the north boundary line of U.S.
Ilighway 82 and the service line extended as it appears on
Exhib~t "A". The purties hnve ~p(lcHically /lp,recd that nIl
of Rrllo' s extr:lterritoriill jurbalietinn ] yi.ll~ w.i.tldn that
arell j.s apportioned to nE~!O, but further lllldl~rstc'lnd :md
agree that the p(lrtie~ Co1nnot, by Lhls Agrcemrnt I confer
upon' RENO extraterritorial jurisdicti6n beyond thnt
conferred upon RENO by the Ler.i.dnturc of the State of Telxns
. ",'.
.',
..... ,
.'
. . . . . .
by its adoption of the Act. Accordingly, the parties
. '
expreSD their conDcnsus that RENO should l\lIve the future
. (. ,:'..
right to expand, if nccessnry, within the area defined for
the logical development and extension of its corporate
boundaries. PARIS agrcc!) that its City Council will
seriously consider properly supported requests for property
lying within the area dCDcribed in this paragraph to be
annexed by RENO, even though such property in within Paris's
e>:traterritorial jurisdiction as dr.picted on Exhibit "A"
:
.,
attached hereto, ~f'such request is presented by RENO in the
future.
SIGNED t,hi!;'
f~
day of October, 198~.
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
By ()
. ~p-
ATTEST:
..'
~~t~ :rerk
APPROVED A
CITY OF RENO, TEXAS
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(.
. .
..
.,' ,,'
. '. ~
'";',
I,
", ....
: "
~'
.. ,
, .
(" .:,
",-,:: '
I '
,0'," "
. .: " ,'.,
. '
, "
",l
" "
" . '0
(~.
,,'
r:::'>;".>' :"',:
\,. -,. "
~'"
No Numbe r 2/5/79
No Number 6/15/61
Ito Number 7/1/62
No Nwnber 7/6/82
Resolution 8/)1/82
(Deannex) (Deannexntion)
No Number 8/31/82
No Number 8/31/82
No Number 8!Jl/82
No Number 3/15/83
No Number 3/16/83
110 Number './27/83
Resolution 7/5/83
, 1113 10/24/83
1114 12/15/83
1115 12/15/83
6116 12/15/83
6118 3/26/8"
~1l9 3/26/84
1120 3/26/81.
1122 6/'I/Oft
, '
112) 6/25/8/1
112'. 7/9/8'1
1125 7/9/Oft
'126 7/9/SIt
... . I .
'.' .
., . "-t' .
,'"~I
0.'
City Assigned
Ordinance Number
61
No Number
, "
185
lIo Number
No Number
No Number
192
','
1:TC~I08 (Rillil\/llnrlll ~)
__'_'.__. ..M'-,.._.....~,_......_ _.~~.,_ _.__
I~XlllII1T n
ANNEXATION/ADOPTION IIISTORY
FOR CITY OF RENO (tAHAR COUNTY)
Date Ordinance
~d nv Ci t~.
Are.a Annexed
2/2'1/66
3/18/(19
Incorporation 908.8 acres
Approx. 157 acres F.n~t
oC HnnsCield Rd. and South
of PJne Hill Rd. to'PreRent
City Limits. I
,
Haning Addn. - 36 IIcres
North Part - 27.419 acres
Jearl Gibson - 8.66 acres
Swnim Addn. 61 & 2 -
5/2/77
3/7/77
2/6/70
4/3/78
23.343 acres
339.178 acres South of
Ra 11 rond nnd 600' SOli th
of Old Clnrksville Road
J. P. Adnms et ux - 222.70
IIcres; Urn. Pnyne - 84.825
10/27/70'
ncres
Frnnk LaRoe - 16.23 acres
Frank LaRoe - 2 acres
Crndy Elmore - 2 ar.res
Robert Skinner - 4 acres
North part oC Haning Addn.
containing 27.419 acres
Jack Nichols - 1 acre
Chester Pridemore - 1 acr'e
Paul Nash - 1 Dcre
SWDim/Rheudisnl - .502 acre
Ida Roach - 2 /tcres
Lindsey - .498 ncre
C. 1. lIodCes - 8.12 /tcres
Rolline Acres - 75.846 /tcres
nr. Lcwis - 128.07 nereR
IInnk Elliot - 1 acre
Swnlm 13 - 7.349 /teres
HcNee~c - 7 acreR
lIutchin!lon - 25.373 Dr.refl
lUcks - 38 acres
Leonnrd - 2.512 acres
Dnrnes - 26 neres
Judith Cibson - 3.984 acres
Ashlock - .276 acre
Trammcll - 1 acre
^ppro~. Total 21J~.7.66 ~creR
.'
" '
',:'. '"
.... .
"', "
',',' .
,0.'.' . .
, .,",'
.....
':.:' . ':,'.
" ,
I:
"
"
, ,
I'
I
I
EXHIBIT B (Page 2)
ANNEXATION/ADOPTION HISTORY FOR THE CITY OF RENO (Continued):
City Assigned Date Ordinance Passed Area Annexed/ I
Ordinance Number by City Council . Owner or Petitioner
217 4/1/85 0.0874 AcreslD.E. Taylor
218 4/1/85 0.304 Acres/D. E. Taylor
219 1111/90 4 AcreslDavy Lee Rodgers
220 8/19/93 1.730 Acres (475 Airport Rd.)
Michael & Gency Fortenberry .
221 9/13/93 1.38 AcresIRobert Skinner, Sr.
222 3/7/94 5 Acres (515 Airport Rd.)
Weldon M. Coston
223 10/10/94 3.48 AcresIBilly & Juanita Arnold
224 10/10/94 7 AcresIBilly Arnold &. Nancy Holt
225 5/8/95 1 Acre/Charles A. Barnes
226 3/11/96 1515 Mansfield Road!
Gerald Westbrook
227 2/1 0/97 1.0 Acre (1625 Mansfield Rd.)/
Gary & Bettie Leisher
228 10/13/97 1.0 Acre (1635 Mansfield Rd.)!
Ted Fortner
229 3/2/98 1.0 Acre (1655 Mansfield Rd.)/
Jerry McFadden
230 4/13/98 9.17 Acres (6555 Pine Mill Rd.)1
Joseph Ciaccio and Leigh Ewing
I<~
EXHIBIT C
ANNEXATION HISTORY FOR
THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS
a. Original Incorporation, 1905 Charter
b. Amended boundaries, 1948 Charter
c. Ordinance No. 1198, passed and adopted on September 12, 1949
d. Ordinance No. 1225, passed and adopted on August 14, 1950
e. Ordinance No. 1227, passed and adopted on December 11, 1950
f. Ordinance No. 1238, passed and adopted on May 14, 1951
g. Ordinance No. 1311, passed and adopted on February 5, 1954
h. Ordinance No. 1321, passed and adopted on May 3, 1954
1. Ordinance No. 1345, passed and adopted on May 14, 1955
j. Ordinance No. 1389, passed and adopted on December 10, 1956
k. Ordinance No. 1496, passed and adopted on November 9, 1959
l. Ordinance No. 1497, passed and adopted on November 9, 1959
m. Ordinance No. 1498, passed and adopted on December 14, 1959
n. Ordinance No. 1542, passed and adopted on May 8, 1961
o. Ordinance No. 1543, passed and adopted on May 8, 1961
p. Ordinance No. 1569, passed and adopted on November 13, 1961
q. Ordinance No. 1606, passed and adopted on October 15, 1962
r. Ordinance No. 1617, passed and adopted on February 11, 1963
s. Ordinance No. 1666, passed and adopted on April 13, 1964
1. Ordinance No. 1739, passed and adopted on August 9, 1965
u. Ordinance No. 1768, passed and adopted on January 24, 1966
v. Ordinance No. 1785, passed and adopted on May 23, 1966
w. Ordinance No. 1787, passed and adopted on June 27, 1966
x. Ordinance No. 1789, passed and adopted on July 11, 1966
y. Ordinance No. 1816, passed and adopted on February 3, 1967
z. Ordinance No. 1827, passed and adopted on May 8, 1967
aa. Ordinance No. 1964, passed and adopted on May 11, 1970
bb. Ordinance No. 2034, passed and adopted on July 12, 1971
cc. Ordinance No. 2064, passed and adopted on December 13, 1971
dd. Ordinance No. 2065, passed and adopted on December 13, 1971
ee. Ordinance No. 2119, passed and adopted on November 20, 1972
ff. Ordinance No. 2162, passed and adopted on August 13, 1973
gg. Ordinance No. 2169, passed and adopted on December 10, 1973
hh. Ordinance No. 2208, passed and adopted on January 13,1975
ii. Ordinance No. 2238, passed and adopted on August 11,1975
jj. Ordinance No. 2267, passed and adopted on December 8,1975
kk. Ordinance No. 2293, passed and adopted on July 12,1976
II. Ordinance No. 2308, passed and adopted on December 13,1976
Page 1 of 2
mm. Ordinance No. 2323, passed and adopted on April 11,1977
nn. Ordinance No. 2335, passed and adopted on June 23,1977
00. Ordinance No. 2369, passed and adopted on December 30,1977
pp. Ordinance No. 2414, passed and adopted on December 29,1980
qq. Ordinance No. 2551, passed and adopted on December 29, 1980
rr. Ordinance No. 2630, passed and adopted on May 10, 1982
ss. Ordinance No. 2650, passed and adopted on September 13~ 1982
tt. Ordinance No. 83-069, passed and adopted on November 14, 1983
uu. Ordinance No. 83-075, passed and adopted on December 12, 1983
vv. Ordinance No. 84-032, passed and adopted on May 14, 1984
ww. Ordinance No. 84-050, passed and adopted on July 30, 1984
xx. Ordinance No. 85-011, passed and adopted on March 11, 1985
yy. Ordinance No. 85-040, passed and adopted on July 8, 1985
zz. Ordinance No. 87-060, passed and adopted on October 19, 1987
aaa. Ordinance No. 87-084, passed and adopted on December 14, 1987
bbb. Ordinance No. 88-055, passed and adopted on December 19, 1988
ccc. Ordinance No. 91-043, passed and adopted on August 12, 1991
ddd. Ordinance No. 91-044, passed and adopted on August 12, 1991
eee. Ordinance No. 93-024, passed and adopted on June 14, 1993
fff. Ordinance No. 93-044, passed and adopted on September 13, 1993
ggg. Ordinance No. 95-007, passed and adopted on January 9, 1995
hhh. Ordinance No. 96-001, passed and adopted on January 2, 1996
iii. Ordinance No. 96-042, passed and adopted on August 9, 1996
JJJ. Ordinance No. 97-044, passed and adopted on September 8, 1997
kkk. Ordinance No. 97-059, passed and adopted on December 15, 1997
Page 2 of 2