1998-121-RES WHEREAS, A SETTLEMENT HAS BEEN NEGOTIATED IN CAUSE NO 64933
RESOLUTION NO. ~
WHEREAS, a settlement has been negotiated in Cause No.64933, styled The City of
Reno, Texas vs. The City of Paris, Texas; and,
WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interests of the citizens of the City of Paris that
such settlement be approved; and,
WHEREAS, the form of the Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims, attached
hereto as Exhibit A, should, in all things, be approved, and the Mayor, Charles H. Neeley, should
be authorized to execute the same; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O}-' PARIS, that the
settlement of Cause No.64933, styled The City of Reno, Texas vs. The City of Paris, Texas, be,
and the same is hereby, approved; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor, Charles H. Neeley, be, and he is
hereby, authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City of Paris, the Compromise
Settlement & Release of All Claims, under the terms and conditions and in the form shown in
Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of August,
Charles H. Neeley, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
..
',I
AMENDMENTS TO
THE AGREEMENT Al)P.ORTIONING
EXTRATERRITORIAL .JURISDICTION OVERLAP,
DATED OCTOBER 8, 1984,
BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARIS AND THE CITY OF RENO
, I
I
That it is agreed by and between the City of Reno, Texas (hereinafter called "RENO"), and
the City of Paris, Texas (hereinafter called "PARIS"), as follows: .
F or and in consideration of the undertakings of each party hereto which is deemed to be a
valid and sufficient consideration to support this agreement, the Agreement entitled AGREEMENT
APPORTIONING EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OVERLAP (hereinafter called "the
1984 Agreement") and dated October 8, 1984, shall be amended as follows:
A. Paragraph I (d) shall be deleted;
B. Paragraph 3 shall be amended to read as follows: "There is .attached hereto as Exhibit
'A' a' Plat prepared by the city staff of PARIS reflecting and depicting the
apportionment. In the event of a conflict between the specific descriptions (whether
by metes and bounds or by distance from a known point or line) and the Plat attached
hereto, the specific descriptions of this Contract and the location of respective
reference points shall control.";
C. Paragraph 5 shall be amended by the addition of the following sentence: "Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, RENO expressly consents to, ratifies,
confirms, and validates those annexations by PARIS which are set out in Exhibit
'C.'" The 1984 Agreement shall be amended by attachment of Exhibit "C.";
D. Paragraph 6 shall be amended by the deletion of the first sentence and modifying the
remainder to read as follows: "The parties have specifically agreed that all areas
shown on : Exhibit 'A' as lying within RENO's extraterritorial jurisdiction are
apportioned to RENO, but further understand and agree that the parties cannot, by the
Agreement, confer upon RENO extraterritorial jurisdiction beyond that conferred
upon RENO by the Legislature of the State of Texas. Accordingly, the parties
express their consensus that RENO should have the future right to expand, if
necessary, within the area apportioned to RENO in Exhibit "A". PARIS agrees that
its City Council will consent to properly supported. requests for annexation of
properties lying within the area apportioned to RENnin Exhibit "A".even though
such property may be within PARIS's extraterritorial Jurisdiction.
E. Paragraph 7 shall be added to read as follows: "In the event of a conflict between
descriptions of previously annexed areas by either City and lhe areas described on
Exhibits 'H' or 'C,' the descriptions in Exhibits 'H' or 'C,' respectively, shall
EXHIBIT A
control."
F. The 1984 Agreement shall be amended by the attachment of a new, updated, Exhibit
"B" and a map of the city limits of the City of RENO.
WITNESS OUR HANDS this 17th day of August, 1998.
~ f!J4-~
Mayor for the City of RENO
,
,
iJinm lup~m1CUC
Allest: City Secretary for the City of RENO
WITNESS OUR HANDS this 17th day of August, 1998.
~ ~'
'. '
. ...' \
,
Allest: City Clerk for the City of ARIS
, /1
1','/
, 1
,
,
,I
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(\
~(L/
Attorney for the City of PARIS
"
EXHIBIT C
ANNEXATION HISTORY FOR
THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS
a. Original Incorporation, 1905 Charter
b. Amended boundaries, 1948 Charter
c. Ordinance No. 1198, passed and adopted on September 12, 1949
d. Ordinance No. 1225, passed and adopted on August 14, 1950
e. Ordinance No. 1227, passed and adopted on December 11, 1950
f. Ordinance No. 1238, passed and adopted on May 14, 1951
g. Ordinance No. 1311, passed and adopted on February 5, 1954
h. Ordinance No. 1321, passed and adopted on May 3, 1954
i. Ordinance No. 1345, passed and adopted on May 14, 1955
j. Ordinance No. 1389, passed and adopted on December 10, 1956
k. Ordinance No. 1496, passed and adopted on November 9, 1959
I. Ordinance No. 1497, passed and adopted on November 9, 1959
m. Ordinance No. 1498, passed and adopted on December 14, 1959
n. Ordinance No. 1542, passed and adopted on May 8, 1961
o. Ordinance No. 1543, passed and adopted on May 8, 1961
p. Ordinance No. 1569, passed and adopted on November 13, 1961
q. Ordinance No. 1606, passed and adopted on October 15, 1962
r. Ordinance No. 1617, passed and adopted on February 11, 1963
s. Ordinance No. 1666, passed and adopted on April 13, 1964
1. Ordinance No. 1739, passed and adopted on August 9, 1965
u. Ordinance No. 1768, passed and adopted on January 24, 1966
v. Ordinance No. 1785, passed and adopted on May 23, 1966
w. Ordinance No. 1787, passed and adopted on June 27, 1966
x. Ordinance No. 1789, passed and adopted on July 11, 1966
y. Ordinance No. 1816, passed and adopted on February 3, 1967
z. Ordinance No. 1827, passed and adopted on May 8, 1967
aa. Ordinance No. 1964, passed and adopted on May 11, 1970
bb. Ordinance No. 2034, passed and adopted on July 12, 1971
cc. Ordinance No. 2064, passed and adopted on December 13, 1971
dd. Ordinance No. 2065, passed and adopted on December 13, 1971
ee. Ordinance No. 2119, passed and adopted on November 20, 1972
ff. Ordinance No. 2162, passed and adopted on August 13, 1973
gg. Ordinance No. 2169, passed and adopted on December 10, 1973
hh. Ordinance No. 2208, passed and adopted on January 13,1975
ii. Ordinance No. 2238, passed and adopted on August 11,1975
jj. . Ordinance No. 2267, passed and adopted on December 8,1975
kk. Ordinance No. 2293, passed and adopted on July 12,1976
II. Ordinance No. 2308, passed and adopted on December 13,1976
Page I of 2
mm. Ordinance No. 2323, passed and adopted on April 11,1977
nn. Ordinance No. 2335, passed and adopted on June 23,1977
00. Ordinance No. 2369, passed and adopted on December 30,1977
pp. Ordinance No. 2414, passed and adopted on December 29,1980
qq. Ordinance No. 2551, passed and adopted on December 29, 1980
rr. Ordinance No. 2630, passed and adopted on May 10, 1982
ss. Ordinance No. 2650, passed and adopted on September 13, 1982
tt. Ordinance No. 83-069, passed and adopted on November 14, 1983
uu. Ordinance No. 83-075, passed and adopted on December 12, 1983
vv. Ordinance No. 84-032, passed and adopted on May 14, 1984
ww. Ordinance No. 84-050, passed and adopted on July 30, 1984
xx. Ordinance No. 85-011, passed and adopted on March 11, 1985
yy. Ordinance No. 85-040, passed and adopted on July 8, 1985
zz. Ordinance No. 87-060, passed and adopted on October 19, 1987
aaa. Ordinance No. 87-084, passed and adopted on December 14, 1987
bbb. Ordinance No. 88-055, passed and adopted on December 19, 1988
ccc. Ordinance No. 91-043, passed and adopted on August 12, 1991
ddd. Ordinance No. 91-044, passed and adopted on August 12, 1991
eee. Ordinance No. 93-024, passed and adopted on June 14, 1993
fff. Ordinance No. 93-044, passed and adopted on September 13, 1993
ggg. Ordinance No. 95-007, passed and adopted on January 9, 1995
hhh. Ordinance No. 96-001, passed and adopted on January 2, 1996
iii. Ordinance No. 96-042, passed and adopted on August 9, 1996
jjj. Ordinance No. 97-044, passed and adopted on September 8, 1997
kkk. Ordinance No. 97-059, passed and adopted on December 15, 1997
Page 2 of 2
CAUSE NO. 64933
THE CITY OF RENO, TEXAS
THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
~
~
~
~
~
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
VS.
OF LAMAR COUNTY, TEXAS
62ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
,
COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT & RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That it is agreed by and between City of Reno, Texas, PLAINTIFF (hereinafter called
"RENO"), and the RELEASED PARTY identified as the City of Paris, Texas, DEFENDANT
(hereinafter called "PARIS"), and its past, present, and future officers, elected officials, employees,
agents, and attorneys (all in both their official and individual capacities), and their respective
insurers, and those in privity with any of them, as follows:
For and in consideration of the undertakings of each party hereto which is deemed to be a
valid and sufficient consideration to support this agreement, the parties agree to resolve all disputes
between them in this proceeding as follows:
1. The Agreement Apportioning Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Overlap (hereinafter called "the
1984 Agreement"), dated October 8, 1984, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "2,"
between them shall be amended as follows:
A. Paragraph 1 (d) shall be deleted;
B. Paragraph 3 shall be amended to read as follows: "There is attached hereto as Exhibit
"A," a Plat prepared by the city staff of PARIS reflecting and depicting the
apportionment. In the event of a conflict between the specific descriptions (whether
by metes and bounds or by distance from a known point or line) and the Plat attached
hereto, th~ specific descriptions of this Contract and the location of respective
reference points shall control.";
C. Paragraph 5 shall be amended by the addition of the following sentence: "Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, RENO expressly consents to , ratifies,
confirms, and validates those annexations by PARIS which are set out in Exhibit
"C," attached hereto.";
D. Paragraph 6 shall be amended by the deletion of the first sentence and modifying the
remainder to read as follows: "The parties have specifically agreed that all areas
shown on Exhibit "A" as lying within RENO's extraterritorial jurisdiction are
apportioned to RENO, but further understand and agree that the parties cannot, by the
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims - Page 1
E xh .'6,t II fJ J", Ill'" oJ
Agreement, confer upon RENO extraterritorial jurisdiction beyond that conferred
upon RENO by the Legislature of the State of Texas. Accordingly, the parties. . . in
the future.";
E. Paragraph 7 shall be added to read as follows: "In the event of a conflict between
descriptions of previously annexed areas by either City and the areas described on
Exhibits "B" or "C," the descriptions on Exhibits "B" or "~," respectively, shall
control."
F. The 1984 Agreement shall be amended by the attachment of a new, updated, Exhibit
"B" and a map of the city limits of the City of RENO.
2. A. The City of Paris's Ordinance No. 97-059 shall be effective as of the date of its
adoption in accordance with its terms, subject to the following:
Notwithstanding any provision contained therein or in applicable law, landowners
whose property is contiguous to RENO's present city limit line (or contiguous to
property which is contiguous to RENO's present city limit line and the owner of
which has also petitioned as set out below) in the following areas:
i. that portion of Tract 12 which can be served by gravity flow into the existing
RENO wastewater collection system. Exhibit "1," attached hereto, which is
a plat of the areas annexed by PARIS by said Ordinance reflects the area of
Tract 12 described by shading in yellow;
ii. that portion of Tract 7 lying one thousand (1000) feet, or more, south of the
centerline of U.S. Highway 82 that can be served by gravity flow into the
existing RENO wastewater collection system. The portion of Tract 7 to
which reference is made is a part of the areas that is shaded yellow on Exhibit
"I'"and
,
iii. that portion of Tract 8 lying north of Smallwood Road and east of the line
defining the area that can be served by gravity flow into the existing RENO
wastewater collection system. The portion of Tract 8 to which reference is
made is a part of the area that is shaded yellow on Exhibit" 1";
may petition the City Council of the City of Paris, prior to December 1, 1998, for
disannexation from the City of Paris and simultaneously petition the City of Reno for
annexation. Such petitions shall be granted by the City Council of PARIS at its first
Council Meeting in December 1998. Annexation proceedings on such tracts shall be
completed by the City Council of RENO prior to April I, 1999, and, if not
completed, or if any of such tracts so annexed are subsequently disannexed, they shall
again become subject to the extraterritorial jurisdiction of PARIS.
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims - Page 2
, .
B. In no case shall PARIS be required to disannex, in addition to land belonging to a
petitioner as described above, additional adjacent or contiguous land by reason of a
statutory requirement now existing or to be enacted, such as Texas Local
Government Code, Sec. 43.147. PARIS shall not be required to consent to a
disannexation request if it results in a landowner who does not wish to be disannexed
and annexed into RENO being landlocked, meaning completely surrounded by
RENO. I
I
C. If, by reason of an approved annexation, a landowner cannot be conveniently served
by PARIS sewer or water service, without PARIS service lines crossing property in
RENO or streets of RENO, then the RENO Council shall approve such person
hooking up to the RENO sewer and/or water system as applicable at a rate of no more
than three (3) times that charged to residents within RENO city limits.
3. Whether an area may be "served by gravity flow" shall mean that area on RENO's side of
the naturally occurring ridge line or dividing line in the natural contour such that sewer
service could be provided without new lift stations or pumps to one of RENO's now existing
lift stations or sewage treatment plant. Determination of such area shall initially be made by
RENO's engineer, KSA Engineers, Inc., based upon the plat prepared for RENO in this case
(which depicts such areas in yellow). In the event of a dispute between the parties as to
location of any area, it shall be determined by the PARIS City Engineer and Mr. Foster and
a third engineer acceptable to both parties. The decision of the three (3) engineers shall be
binding on all parties. In the event the parties cannot agree on the third engineer, the Judge
of the 62nd Judicial Court shall appoint a third engineer whose fee and expenses in the
matter shall be divided evenly between RENO and PARIS.
4. A. PARIS shall agree that for a period of seven (7) years from and after the date hereof
it will not undertake any annexation proceedings in the following described area:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the centerline of County
Road 42600 (also known as Pine Mill Road) and RENO's
apportioned extraterritorial jurisdiction as shown on Exhibit "A,"
attached to the 1984 Agreement;
THENCE easterly with said centerline to its intersection with
Sun Valley's extraterritorial jurisdiction line, thence northeasterly and
easterly with Sun Valley's extraterritorial jurisdiction line to its
intersection with the centerline of County Road 42600;
THENCE easterly to its intersection to the east right of way
line ofF.M. Highway 196;
THENCE northerly with said east right of way line to a point
being 1.5 mile south of F.M. Highway 195, thence southwesterly
along a line 1.5 mile south of and parallel to said centerline ofF.M.
Highway 195 to its intersection with RENO's apportioned
extraterritorial jurisdiction as shown on Exhibit "A," attached to the
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims. Page 3
1984 Agreement;
THENCE Southerly and easterly with said apportioned
extraterritorial jurisdiction line to the place of beginning.
B. During such period, PARIS shall not oppose on the grounds that area is within the
extraterritorial jurisdiction of PARIS, and its City Council shall consent to,. if
necessary, annexations by RENO within the defined area wl~ich otherwise comply
with applicable statutes, even if the area to be annexed is, at that time, within
PARIS's extraterritorial jurisdiction. The defined area is shaded in green on the
attached Exhibit "1."
5. The Parties each understand and agree that the conditions given under this agreement are in
full satisfaction of all injuries and damages arising on account of the above-described events
and that they will receive no further sums of money therefrom. RENO agrees to not assert
or prosecute any further claims or lawsuits therefore against anyone whomsoever, whether
or not herein or otherwise named, described or identified. Any and all claims against parties
not specifically released herein, if any, are hereby assigned in full to the parties hereby
released.
6. RENO and PARIS hereby represent and warrant to each other and to the Court that no
promises, representations, or agreements not set out herein have been made to them; that this
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims is executed without reliance upon any
statement or representation of any person or parties released or their representatives,
concerning the nature and extent of the injuries, damages, and/or legal liability therefor; that
acceptance of the consideration set forth herein is a full accord and satisfaction of a disputed
claim, which is expressly denied; and that this Compromise Settlement & Release of All
Claims is made of their own free will and accord after consulting with and acting upon the
advice of their attorneys.
7. F or the same consideration, it is agreed that an agreed judgment will be approved and entered
in the above-styled suit and that costs of court, including attorneys' fees, will be taxed to the
party incurring the same.
8. Although originally drafted by attorneys for the RELEASED PARTIES, this Compromise
Settlement & Release of all Claims is a contract which is the product of negotiations between
the parties and attorneys for the parties and which shall, in the event of any dispute over its
meaning or application, be interpreted fairly and reasonably, and neither more strongly for
or against either party. This document contains the entire agreement of the parties hereto.
9. The City Councils of RENO and PARIS have held special sessions in their respective Cities
and have authorized this Compromise Settlement & Release of all Claims as shown by the
signatures of their authorized agents below.
THE PROVISIONS OF THIS COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT & RELEASE OF ALL
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims. )):tge 4
CLAIMS ARE CONTRACTUAL AND NOT MERE RECITALS.
WITNESS OUR HANDS this 16th day of August, 1998.
-U~~=
Mayor for the lty of RENO
~Qk(Q ~
'"
Attest: City Secretary (or the City of RENO
I
WITNESS OUR HANDS this 16th day of August, 1998.
, ,
;' \
, ",\.'
, ,
'\... l
',: '\'.',
,'"\ ,
I ..,. I
! I, .' ,",
, /,
" I"
~. . 't ,I .
, . /
I' "
'. ,
,',' . ,
,/ '.:\ ...,'
, /!'~ ,~
" .. I:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
.: ('
I" (
\ :,
,I
I,'; I. '
"
t, 'I .'~t'. "".;: .t:;'~' /
"" '., . I I~ ~'~'. '. I., ,,~
, '..
, '" l;".,,;.:, ~ .." 11'
~?M
Attorney for the City of PARIS
Compromise Settlement & Release of All Claims. Page 5
'.. ,
I.
.. . ..', . ,
:."':" ....
.'
c..............
. ."
". .
. ~
'.'
.' ,
'" .
',', ..
. ,
'. "
. "
c>
,
. ,'..
. :...;,:.
'.
,". ..
'. ,
, . , '.
, '. '. .
...... "'.,.
. -..',' .'
',' ','
','> " , "
,', '. '
, I:',',',
, . .
,.' .
:....... .,.'
. ,,<,': .;:'
.' " ":>.'" ".:-'
, ',-:.,', ,.....:' '.:
. ",',,' ',,"
.. . . .
(. ":.':;'..::.."
. )\~';.:~;.:
. .
.', .
. .: .','.,1
.' ".':'
..;
. "
.','.'.'," ....
.,''''
,
.
"
'.
....
ACREEHENT APPOR'l'IONU1C F.XTRATEP.RI'l'ORIAL
JURISDICTION OVlmI.AP
'.'
This Agrcement madc ilnd entered into h~twce'n the CIT'!
OF PARIS, PARlS, TEXAS,' :J I\lunicipnl corpor:ltioh, ncti.nl~ by
and through its Milyor, Joe Crnhnm, duly ;)uthori7.cd by
Rcsolution of its City Council, nttc~ted by it~ City Clerk,
I
I
II, C, Crcane, .lOcI npproved :t!l to form hy i.u~ City Attorney,
T, K, Haynes, hereafter cnlled PARIS, nnu the CITY OF RENO,
TEXAS, actine herein by 1I11d through itn Hnyor, nttC:lteu by
its City $C!l~rcitnry, both officers hri.ng ll'.lthodzed to net in
the piemiscs by Ordlnnnee of it~ City Commi~~iDn duly
ndC\ptcd, hereafter en Heu RENO, nl~rt.c thnt' tlw following
facts exist ilnd nre true:
]. The City of J'AI~IS b: a 110111(1 full' dt.y f:l1tit'led \:0
:\11 ext'rllti~rritorilll' jllri.~di(:ti()n c()n~i.l:tiJll~ ()l: :Ill t.h(l
cOlltiguou!1 unincorpornr:Cll nrNI not ;1 p,1rt. of :my other city,
within two (2.0) llIilc~ of it!') eorpofll te lirlli tll undp.r the
provisions of Article 970a, il~ umended, Revised Civil
Statutes of Texas, the MlInicipnl Annexati.on Act, hereafter
called Act.
2. The City of RENO. Tcxn~, is n general lnw city nnd
is clltitlcd to an p.xtrlltcrtitori.[ll jurisd1.ction' consi.sting
of nIl the contiguous unincorporated nrell, not n pnrt of any
I
,
other city, "lithin one-huH (0.5) mile of its' corporate
limitn under the Act,
3. PARIS :lIld RENO :lrc 1;j.\:U~tl'd wir:hin r,uch proximity
to one :I\lothl~r thnt their !;tntIJI:.0rv (~xtrntcrrit:()d:t1. .'Iuri::-
, J
. .
di.c:ti.ons ovcrlnp one nnotlwr.
, ,
4. PARIS :mt! RENO r<1l'ogni~C! \:h:!/; ('he .1ppo'!'1':1.olllnlmt of
the ex~rllterr:ttorilll jllrilaliction O'1Cl'lllp bet:'~ecll tll(,! tHO
c,iti'cs would be difficult uccnmH! to do so would involve u
dr.tuminntion of the respective populiltions of e:leh ci.ty on
September I, 1963, the effective dilt:(l of the Aet; 1.nr.r<~.:tSl'f: '
"
in population of each dty, if f,tlch incrcD!:(l!1 rnir.cd the
','
"
EXHIBIT 2
....
'" . .
. '. .
, .
, , "
/.
.;
... ..,..
:,', ,'. .
'. .
, .'.
I.
".,' '.'
. .
.... '
".' "
" .','.
~ .;. .
..'..~ ",', .. . :.:, ' , . .
.... .
,,'..-.
. ..,.....
. .
, '.'
..
',".'..
, . ."
.'....-
\~.
, .... ," '. ~ "
'. '~
., " .....
, . ',". ".'
. . f. '.. . .'. ~ ...:'. ".
" . . .
'.' ".".
. ....
..' , .
. ".'. "
, .',' '.
.' ,..
". .
'. '...
.. .'..
"" .t,
'.'.',.
'.' .
, ..'
. '
'.:'/'.. .<:.....:
.,:. .
.. '.. . '.
(' ,. . " ..
. ,..'
~::"
,.,....
..:. ',.'
,',
, ,
.' .
f'." . .
\ ,.
. ", '.';::'
, ,
. .
"
.' ,
.: '..:."
"
.....,
population limits of tht'~ city to n different entitlement
unclr.r the Act i the sequencr. nnd vnlidi.ty of pnnexntion!J of
property to ench city ~nd the cffect of such annexations to
the cxpansion of the extrllterritorial jurisdiction of each
citYi nnd th~ p'roper methou of rc~;()lution of I'\OY resulting
overlap under the terms nnu provisions of the Act nnd
spccificnlly Section 3H thereof.
5. Roth PARIS nnd RENO have :mncxed territory withi.n
the extrnterritorlnl. jUrl!ldicti.OIl ef the otlw)" \/lthout the
written consent of the athe}" , crcllcing conflicts uncler the
term!! of the Act, which should he n'solved.
G. The respective City Council nnd City Commission of
PARIS anu RENO, actinr; throllt~h thei.r city staffs, have
renched ar,r(\cment liS to the ~pp('rti()nll\('nt of the confUcts
nnd overlnys in their c:(tr~lterrit()rilll jllri.l.ldi.c~ion whi.ch
,.
, '.
"
" '
... ,".
'.: .........
I,
,",1' ,
" ,
they desire to reduce to \;riti.ng, thereby rC5olvinl~ such
conflict and providing guidancc for the nnncxations of each
',' .
. : ..' ' ',.,
party hereto in the future.
NO\~, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL HEN IW 'l'IIE~;E J'nESEN'1'~i, thn t
the CITY OF PARIS and the CITY OF RENO, TEXAS, in considern-
I,
tion of thl:' prernif.cf. tlnd the t1l':lirc ('f their reepective
r,ovcrning bodicr. to rer.ol ve nIl conflict!; in extra-
territorial jurisdiction between tlH~m UO hereby contract :lnd
ngre~ as fotlo\/s:
1. There if. [Ipportioncd to IlENO tIll! follm.!i.ng overlaps
in extraterritori.lll jurisdiction between the pnrtier.:
. ,.'
(n) A trnct of l:mu cowmr.ncing at the
intersection of the cnst boundary line
of F. N. 'lli~hwilY 1508 .1nd the south
boundary line of the His~ollri-r~ci[ic
Railroad right-of-way nnd thence enst
with said r.outh rnilroad right-of-way
linC! 500 feet tn 1\ poi.nt i thence !louth
pnrnllel with the enst ri/jht-o[-\~ay line
of F. N. Highwuy 150n to 1I point of
intersection wi.th the cClrporate limi.ts
of the City of Paris on th~ north slue
of Cox Airporti thence w~st 500 feet to
the enst boundary li.ne of F. M. HiRhwny
150B l,' thence north '...1 th snid e:wt
right'-of-wny linl! of F. M. High,...ay 150n
to the point of begin~ing.
.' ,
'..
','
I
"
, '
'" . .
, "
.' . ,'t
(""
, ..,
", ~ . .
, I
" '
.....
, ,
I" "
"', .,'
,f '"
"," .
. .'.'
'.",: .,':'
" ....'..
.:..','
",'
, "
.' ",
.....
",
"""'" ",
" " "
, "
, '
, "
',", '.
'.', '.
......
.... ,.',
. '. "
',.,' I."
" , \~ ',',',:,.' ';',
. , "
. ,,' ,',;'
:\. .,'
"0':' .
" "":,::':-::;",:-:':
. ", ." .
,......:.: .....
. ....
" ,
", .,'
. ' ',','
"
. ,
. .
,
.
.: .
(b) A trnct of land beginning at thc inter-
section of nn extension of the east.
boundary line or 6 N. E. !louth across
.. Highway 82 Enst to :laid 'highwll)'S sO\lth
boundary line bcgi.nnin[~ :It thnt point
thence south to the north boundClry Hne
of the Hi.r.soud-PaciHc R"i.lrond r.lf"ht-
of-wllY; thence \-ICSt Hith said north
dBht-of-wIlY Une 150 feet to the cant
COl'pOrlltr limits of the City of RCIlo:
thence north to the south right-of-\-I:lY
line of U. S. lIil.~ll\~ny 82; thence C.1st
with snid sO\lth ril~ht-of-wny of U. S.
lligh~lny 82 to the point of bef~inninl~.
(c), Beginning at n point in the ~lest
boundary line of 13th ~treet S.W. (Reno)
lit its i.ntcr~ecti.on \-lith the !louthern
most corporate limitn of Reno as it
prr.lIcntly eKiflts; thence wc!:t 150 'feet
with snid south corporate limit line of
Reno to a polnt; thence south to tll(!
north boundary line of Old Clnr\r.sville
ROlld; thence enst npproximately 150 feet
with the north boundary lin~ of, Old
Clnrksville Rond to itn intersection
,dth ,the wcst boundnrv iinc of 13th'
Strect S.W.: thence norih with the welle
boundary line of 13th Street S.W. to the
place of beginning.
(d) All of the conflicting extraterritorial
jurisdiction of the parties fro~ the
north boundary line of U. S. lIigh\oulY 82
in a northwesterly direction to the
intersection of the agreed service line
bctHeen PlIris and Reno extended from its
present terminu5 north of Reno to the
nortll\"cst in the S:1mc course.
2. All other ovcrl.:Jp!: ClIH.l extrnterritori.nl jurisdic-
tion h(!t\~een the parties hereto Clre npportioned to PARIS
subject to the followinc provisions of tllis subpClragrnph:
(a) The nre:! designated "ArM ^" on the Plnt
attached hereto n~ lm Exhibit as set out in
Pnra~rnph J hereof'sholl bn connidcred within
the r.xtrnterritorinl jurisdiction of the City
of PARIS; howevcr~ it i~ exprrsnly n~r~ed nnd
llllderr.tooll th:lt the City COlll1ci] of the Ci.ty
of PARI~ wi 1.1 <'II tl'rl::ri.1I :lnd fllvol":Jb ly
conr.i.der cedinc Arl~:l A or II p:Jrt thereof to
the extrnterritori.ll juri.:!dicLioll of thc.' City
of RENO for nnnexntion by the City of RENO
upon receipt of n request from the property
owner of the Innd included within Arcn A for
annexation to the Ci.ty of RENO I nccompnnied
by n development plnn acceptable to the City
Council of the Cit)' of PARIS.
~
,f ,
','
....
." 'f':
'I'
"0"
;. ,"
'. '... .
','..' ,:",:.,:. '. . .
.. .,... ','
" .... "~~ ~ ":::," " .:.
, "
, '.
" ....
, :.'"',,
",., ,.
.'.......
,"
, , '
. .,t:""::"
, "
': ','.:.',"" :,,','
t,' ,.""
. ,t,
, ;,:,:,::>.:,:~~>:;-'"
:...... '.
'.,'. . 't,-
I,
."
. ',',','.
.,t,
" ,
:,",
. ,',"
'. .....
" ,', "
I
.....
I,. .
...1....
.,', .
, ,','
, "
. 0',1,':,.,
I .
\' '
-,..,1
....
.,. "
'.....:,...'. :.::'
c."
,:'...... .
, .
',. '", ,
, ..,'. ~. to : ",', ',.
. ",
." ,.'
:: ,',
. . ,...:.......:...
','" .
, , ..
. ,t,,, ....
, ,
',. .
"',> . ,':.'.,'..< ....
. . ~ . ":::, .' .t, .:
'.' t.',',',
....
......'.
"
" ,
I, .' ':
'"
. ......
. ",," I
.. ',,0',' :
. .,.........:
" ','
,'.' -',.:
"
. .
"
.'
. '
"
3, Thera is attnchcd hare to n5 Exhibit A, n PI~t
prepared by tha city staff of FARIS reflecting and, depicting
the apportionment sat out in pnrnGrnphs I and ~ hereof for
illustrative purposes, In the event of conflict between the
recitations of this Contract nnd the Plat attached hereto,
I
the n!ci~ntionf) of thi.~ Contrnct :1I111 the locdti,on of the
respec~ive reference points shall control,
4. PARIS hereby expressly consents to each nnd every
annexation mnde by RENO, prior to the date hereof of lnnd or
territory within the extraterritorinl jurisdiction of PARIS.
Without limiting the genarality of the foregoing, PAR~S
expressly consents to, ratifies, confirms nnd validates
those anncxntions by RENO ",hi,eh nre net out on E:<.hihi t "n"
nttached hereto.
5", RENO hereby expresnly conSI~nt:l to each and every
annexation rnnde by PARIS prior to the dnte hereof of land or
tcrrito~y within ~le extraterritorial jurisdiction of RENO.
6. 'fhe particD hereto cxprcnsly f1~ree by and bet'o1ccn
themselves that it is rccor,nizcd that a mnterilll consid-
eration for the approvnl of thiD PInt by RENO is the under-
standing and ngrecment reac~cd between the parties that the
arell available to RENO for expansion in the future after the
development of its prescnt extraterritorinl jurisdiction
should lbgically lie between the north boundary line of U.S.
lIighwllY 82 nnu the service line cxtended liS it appears on
Exhib~t "A". 'fhe Pllrtics hnve r.p('ci.Cic:tlly nr,recd thnt 1111
of Rrno I s extr:lterr.t'torlill juril:l.liel:lnll 1 yi.nr, w.i.thi.n that
aren Js apportioned to RE~!O, uut further lllld(!rst.'md :md
ngrep. thDt the pnrt.tc!l c.:lnnot, by Lhls AI~re(:mC'nt, confer
upon' RENO extraterritorial jurisdicti~n, beyond that
conferred upon RENO by the Ler,1.r.lilture or the State of Texas
','
".:','. ........ ',,','
't . : ",',
"
"
"
, .
"... .
,t.::'...:,'.;::.'
, "
,0 '.
" 0',
::".'::".,' ',.:..
.... ''''.
'..,"
. "',','
.' ..,.......
'"., .
" '
,
"
"::".:. .
. '. ,
" . .
. , , .
. '..,.' ".,'.'
'," ' ,..'"
I ',' "',""::::,,'"
, .' ,'.
. .......
'. ~ ,
( ,',
\ "".,.
. ...... :,'.
'.'," f""'.''''
,', .
, "
'.,. "
, ' '"
,,'
'" .
,"',"
(" :
, '
'"
\' ,
'" ( ,
:::.
"
, '
.' ,'.
",: .,'
, '
by ~ . adoption of the Act. Accordingly, the parties
" ,
expresD their conDensus that RE~IO should hllve the future
right to e~pand, if necessnry, within the aren defined for
"
the logical development and cxtcnnion of itn corporate
boundaries. PARIS ar.rae!l that it!: City Council. will
seriously consider ptopcrly supported requa~ts for property
lying within the tireD described in this pnrazraph to be
[mnexed by RENO, even thour.,h such property in \li.thin Paris I s
,'",
c):trnterritorial jurisdiction as dr.picted on Exhibit nAn
..
attached hereto, ~f'such request in presented by RENO in the
future.
SIGNED t,hin'
fa-.
day of October, 198~.
,,' "
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
," ,
; 't ~
. ,,.'
I'., .
ATTEST:
~~b:rerk
I,
CITY OF RENO, TEXAS
ny,~-OI9~~
Ed\o/arffilullarc, 1ayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
,
" '
"
" ,
"
"
, ,
I
, "
. "., '.,' ,"
",
,....
. '"
. .", . .':.
. '
,'.... '.
(,::;
, ".'
'.". .
I '.
...... .'
. ,~ . I ......
. '.'
. .. ',:"
. ".'
, "
. ".
".""
",
.,'.....
(.' .
.',
'.
"
C::~'.~~., ..;.'-=.:.: .....~:
...... .' ..
.".
" . .,.: '..'.
'.. .
.
,
, ,.
. \,
,'r '
...""lUll II
ANlII:XATION/ ADOI'TION IIJSTORY
FOR CITY OF RENO (tAMAR COUNTY)
City Assigned
Ordln"nc~ Number
Date Ordinance
Passed nv Clt).
Art-a Annexed
'1
2/211/66
3/18/(,9
Incorporntlon 908.8 acres
Approx. 157 DCreS Fonst
of Mnnsfield Rd. and South
No Number
, .'
of Pine Hill Rd. to'PreRent
City Llmi u. ,
I
nnning Addn. ~ 36 Rcres
North rnrt - 27.419 ncres
185
5/2/77
llo Number
3/7/71
2/6/78
, .
...... .'
":',,:':,,"'.. .:.:.
Jcnrl Clbson - 8.66 acres
S~nlm Addn. 61 A 2 -
No Numher
No Number
'./)/78
23.31,3 acres
3)9.178 ncres South of
Rallrond nn~ 600' South
of Old Clnrksville Rond
J. P. Adnrns et ux - 222.70
IIcres; \lln. Pnyne - 81..825
" "
'.". . ..
" .' '.. '
'.; ,',:" '"
: ' :>'. ~.
:'.'
'92
10/27/78'
, ,
. ":,' '. ~. . :.: :' .
ncres
tlo Number 2/5/79
No Number 6/15/81
110 Number 7/1/02
No Number 7/6/82
Resolution 0/31/82
(Deannex) (Dennnexntlon)
No Number 8/31/02
No Number 8/31/02
No Number a!Jl/02
No Number 3/15/83
No Number 3/16/8)
110 Number '''~7/8)
Resolution 1/5/83
, 6113 10/21./03
1114 12/15/8)
t115 12/15/83
'1 \(1 12/15/8)
'11 R 3/U,/81.
~ 119 3/2(,/81.
'120 3/26/nt.
1122 6/'./81.
I' ,
1123 6/25/81.
, 12', 1/9/8Ie
1125 1/9/81.
'126 1/9/8It
,
Frnnk taRoe - 16.23 acres
Fronk LaRoe - 2 ocres
Crndy Elmore - 2 ar.res
Robert Skinner - 4 acres
llorth flnrt of lIoming Addn.
containing 27.419 acres
Jack Nichols - 1 ncre
Chester Pridemore - 1 ncr'e
Pnul Nash - 1 acre
$wnlm/~Ieudisal - .502 acre
Ida Roach - 2 acres
Lindsey - .498 ncre
C. 1. lIodees - 8.12 neres
Rolline Acres - 75.846 neres
Dr. Levls - 128.01 nereR
IInnk F.ll1ot - 1 acre
$unlm '3 - 1.349 neres
Hcllee;e - 7 ncreR
lIutchill!lon - 25.37) acre!!
Illcks - 38 acres
Leonard - 2.512 neres
n~rncs - 26 acres
Judith Cibson - 3.984 acres
Ashlock - .216 acre
Trammell - 1 ncre
. .','
',:,:,' ;;:'.: ::- .
",.'
."
':.:' .....'.
.' ,
'.
I:,
, "
,.
,., ~ . . .
'::," .
'"
, '.'."
" " ."
. .'
','
Appro~. Totn} 2134.1.66 ~cre!l
"'.
I:TC~.OR (Rillil\/llnrlll ~)
I
I
--,-'-'..~~' "'" ....-.......,......- .......- ...~.-
EXHIBIT B (pago 2)
ANNEXATION/ADOPTION HISTORY FOR THE CITY OF RENO (Continued):
City Assigned Date Ordinance Passed Area Annexed/
I
Ordinance Number by City Council . Owner or Petitioner
217 4/1/85 0.0874 AcrcslD.E. Taylor
218 4/1/85 0.304 Acres/D. E. Taylor
219 1/11/90 4 AcresIDavy Lee Rodgers
220 8/19/93 1.730 Acres (475 Airport Rd.)
Michael & Gency Fortenberry :
221 9/13/93 1.38 AcresIRobert Skinner, Sr.
222 3/7/94 5 Acres (515 Airport Rd.)
Weldon M. Coston
223 10/10/94 3.48 AcreslBilly & Juanita Arnold
224 10/10/94 7 AcresIBilly Arnold & Nancy Holt
225 5/8/95 1 Acre/Charles A. Barnes
226 3/11/96 151 S Mansfield Road!
Gerald Westbrook
227 2/1 0/97 1.0 Acre (1625 Mansfield Rd.)1
Gary & Bettie Leisher
228 10/13/97 1.0 Acre (1635 Mansfield Rd.)/
Ted Fortner
229 3/2/98 1.0 Acre (l6SS Mansfield Rd.)1
Jerry McFadden
230 4/13/98 9.17 Acres (6SSS Pine Mill Rd.)1
Joseph Ciaccio and Leigh Ewing
, .
,
, \
EXHIBIT C
ANNEXATION HISTORY FOR
THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS
a. Original Incorporation, 1905 Charter
b. Amended boundaries, 1948 Charter
c. Ordinance No. 1198, passed and adopted on September 12, 1949
d. Ordinance No. 1225, passed and adopted on August 14, 1950
e. Ordinance No. 1227, passed and adopted on December 11,1950
f. Ordinance No. 1238, passed and adopted on May 14, 1951
g. Ordinance No. 1311, passed and adopted on February 5, 1954
h. Ordinance No. 1321, passed and adopted on May 3, 1954
1. Ordinance No. 1345, passed and adopted on May 14, 1955
j. Ordinance No. 1389, passed and adopted on December 10, 1956
k. Ordinance No. 1496, passed and adopted on November 9, 1959
l. Ordinance No. 1497, passed and adopted on November 9, 1959
m. Ordinance No. 1498, passed and adopted on December 14, 1959
n. Ordinance No. 1542, passed and adopted on May 8, 1961
o. Ordinance No. 1543, passed and adopted on May 8, 1961
p. Ordinance No. 1569, passed and adopted on November 13, 1961
q. Ordinance No. 1606, passed and adopted on October 15, 1962
r. Ordinance No. 1617, passed and adopted on February 11, 1963
s. Ordinance No. 1666, passed and adopted on April 13, 1964
1. Ordinance No. 1739, passed and adopted on August 9, 1965
u. Ordinance No. 1768, passed and adopted on January 24, 1966
v. Ordinance No. 1785, passed and adopted on May 23, 1966
w. Ordinance No. 1787, passed and adopted on June 27, 1966
x. Ordinance No. 1789, passed and adopted on July 11, 1966
y. Ordinance No. 1816, passed and adopted on February 3, 1967
z. Ordinance No. 1827, passed and adopted on May 8, 1967
aa. Ordinance No. 1964, passed and adopted on May 11, 1970
bb. Ordinance No. 2034, passed and adopted on July 12, 1971
cc. Ordinance No. 2064, passed and adopted on December 13, 1971
dd. Ordinance No. 2065, passed and adopted on December 13, 1971
ee. Ordinance No. 2119, passed and adopted on November 20, 1972
ff. Ordinance No. 2162, passed and adopted on August 13, 1973
gg. Ordinance No. 2169, passed and adopted on December 10, 1973
hh. Ordinance No. 2208, passed and adopted on January 13,1975
ii. Ordinance No. 2238, passed and adopted on August 11,1975
jj. Ordinance No. 2267, passed and adopted on December 8,1975
kk. Ordinance No. 2293, passed and adopted on July 12,1976
II. Ordinance No. 2308, passed and adopted on December 13,1976
Page I of 2
mm. Ordinance No. 2323, passed and adopted on Apri111,1977
nn. Ordinance No. 2335, passed and adopted on June 23,1977
00. Ordinance No. 2369, passed and adopted on December 30,1977
pp. Ordinance No. 2414, passed and adopted on December 29,1980
qq. Ordinance No. 2551, passed and adopted on December 29, 1980
rr. Ordinance No. 2630, passed and adopted on May 10, 1982
ss. Ordinance No. 2650, passed and adopted on September 13~ 1982
tt. Ordinance No. 83-069, passed and adopted on November 14, 1983
uu. Ordinance No. 83-075, passed and adopted on December 12, 1983
VV. Ordinance No. 84-032, passed and adopted on May 14, 1984
ww. Ordinance No. 84-050, passed and adopted on July 30, 1984
xx. Ordinance No. 85-011, passed and adopted on March 11, 1985
yy. Ordinance No. 85-040, passed and adopted on July 8, 1985
zz. Ordinance No. 87-060, passed and adopted on October 19, 1987
aaa. Ordinance No. 87-084, passed and adopted on December 14, 1987
bbb. Ordinance No. 88-055, passed and adopted on December 19, 1988
ccc. Ordinance No. 91-043, passed and adopted on August 12, 1991
ddd. Ordinance No. 91-044, passed and adopted on August 12, 1991
eee. Ordinance No. 93-024, passed and adopted on June 14, 1993
fff. Ordinance No. 93-044, passed and adopted on September 13, 1993
ggg. Ordinance No. 95-007, passed and adopted on January 9, 1995
hhh. Ordinance No. 96-001, passed and adopted on January 2, 1996
iii. Ordinance No. 96-042, passed and adopted on August 9, 1996
jjj. Ordinance No. 97-044, passed and adopted on September 8, 1997
kkk. Ordinance No. 97-059, passed and adopted on December 15, 1997
Page 2 of 2