Loading...
07-F Atmos GRIP filing l:8JAction CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REQUEST MEETING DATE: I June 25, 2007 D Discussion Dlnformation DRefer to: SUBMITTED BY: I Gene Anderson, Director of Finance DESCRIPTION: Resolution suspending the fourth GRIP(Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program) surcharge request filed by Atmos Energy Corporation Mid- T ex Division for a minimum of 45 days past the proposed effective date of July 30,2007. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) was originally enacted by the Texas Legislature in 2003 to allow gas utilities an opportunity to recover costs associated with replacing aging portions of natural gas pipeline to enhance reliability and public safety without the necessity of a full blown rate case. However, Atmos-Mid Tex has tried to use the statute to recover any change in invested capital. As a result, Atmos Mid-Tex has attempted to surcharge items not related to system safety or reliability including furniture, artwork, computers, air conditioners, new parking lots, first class airfare, hotels, meals, liquor, employee gifts, limousine travel, and charitable contributions. The last GRIP review also revealed that Atmos capitalized short lived items such as Kleenex, trash can liners, staples, and other office supplies. The purpose of the suspension is to allow additional time for an expert working for the Atmos Cities Steering Committee (Paris is a member.) to review and analyze the surcharge application. Any findings can then be presented to the Railroad Commission in an attempt to block any inappropriate increase. The Atmos Cities Steering Committee will report back to its member cities with recommendations for additional action prior to September 13th. FISCAL AUTHORITY: I Not applicable. LEGAL REVIEW: I MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: . .. t r-r' DRAFT F:A TTORNEY\RESWORK\CURRENTI A TMOS - Res Suspending Proposal - GRIP Rate Adj June 15,2007 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS, SUSPENDING THE JULY 30, 2007 EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PROPOSAL BY ATMOS ENERGY, MID-TEX DIVISION TO IMPLEMENT INTERIM GRIP RATE ADJUSTMENTS FOR GAS UTILITY INVESTMENT IN 2006; AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION WITH THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE ("ACSC") IN A REVIEW AND INQUIRY INTO THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE FILING AND THE BASIS OF THE PROPOSED RATE ADJUSTMENTS; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION IN ADMINISTRATIVE AND COURT PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING THE PROPOSED GRIP RATE ADJUSTMENTS; REQUIRING REIMBURSEMENT OF REASONABLE LEGAL AND CONSULTANT RA TEMAKING COSTS; AND REQUIRING DELIVERY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE COMPANY AND LEGAL COUNSEL; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Paris, Paris, Texas ("City:) is a gas utility customer of Atmos Energy, Mid- Tex Division, ("Atmos Mid- Tex" or "the Company") and a regulatory authority with an interest in the rates and charges of Atmos Mid-Tex; and, WHEREAS, Atmos Mid- Tex made filings with the City and the Railroad Commission of Texas ("Railroad Commission") on or about May 31, 2007, proposing to implement interim rate adjustments ("GRIP Rate Increases") pursuant to Texas Utilities Code ~ 104.301 on all customers served by Atmos Mid-Tex, effective July 30, 2007; and, WHEREAS, Atmos Mid- Tex was recently granted a rate increase as a result of its filing in GUD No. 9670, in which the Final Order was only signed on March 29,2007; and, WHEREAS, in GUD No. 9670, it was determined that Atmos Mid- Tex had inappropriately included certain expenditures in its prior GRIP rate increases for rate years 2003,2004, and 2005; and, WHEREAS, it is incumbent upon the City, as a regulatory authority, to examine this latest GRIP filing to determine its compliance with the Texas Utilities Code; and, WHEREAS, ratepayers of Atmos Mid- Tex, including the City and its residents, will be adversely impacted by the proposed GRIP Rate Increases; and WHEREAS, it is advantageous for the City and its citizens to coordinate the City's response to Atmos' filing with similarly situated municipalities; and, .....-------r WHEREAS, the City has benefitted from prior participation with the Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"); and, WHEREAS, it is efficient and cost beneficial for the City to again coordinate review of the reasonableness of the proposed GRIP rate increases and joint participation in any proceedings at the Railroad Commission related to the proposed GRIP rate increases; and, WHEREAS, the Executive Committee of ACSC has recommended suspension and established a budget for evaluation of the Atmos filing; and, WHEREAS, a GRIP proceeding involves rate making, entitling cities to reimbursement of reasonable rate case expenses; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS: Section 1. That the findings set out in the preamble to this resolution are hereby in all things approved. Section 2. That the July 30, 2007, effective date of the GRIP Rate Increases proposed by Atmos Mid-Tex is hereby suspended for the maximum period allowed by law to permit adequate time to investigate the sufficiency of the GRIP rate increase filing, review the proposed increases, analyze all necessary information, and take appropriate action related to the proposed increases. Section 3. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities to create and participate in a Steering Committee to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, to negotiate with the Company, to make recommendations to the City regarding the proposed GRIP Rate Increases, and to direct any administrative proceedings or litigation associated with the proposed GRIP Rate Increases. Section 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any administrative proceedings or litigation associated with the proposed GRIP Rate Increases. Section 5. That Atmos Mid-Tex shall promptly reimburse the City's reasonable costs associated with the City's activities related to the proposed GRIP Rate Increases. Section 6. That a copy of this Resolution shall be sent to Atmos Mid- Tex, care of Charles R. Yarbrough, II, at Atmos Energy Corporation, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75240, and to Geoffrey Gay, legal counsel to the coalition of cities, at Lloyd Gosselink, 816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1900, Austin, Texas 78701. Section 7. That this resolution shall be effective from and after its date of passage. 11"~ ''"T ATMOS energy Charles R. Yarbrough, 1\ Vice President Rates & Reaulatorv Affairs June 5, 2007 City Official Re: Rider GCR - Rate Filing under Docket No. 9670 Enclosed is a Revised Atmos Energy Corp., Mid- Tex Division's Statement of Rider GCR applicable for the June 2007 billing periods. The original Statement of Rider GCR contained an incorrect estimated gas cost in Part A. This Revised Statement of Rider GCR contains the correct estimated gas cost for June 2007. There are no changes in Part B except for the flow through of the corrected estimated gas cost. No customers were billed under the original Statement of Rider GCR. This filing is for informative proposes only and no action is required on your city's part. Should you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Attachment Atmos Energy Corporation 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1800 Dallas, TX 75240 P 214-206-2809 F 214-206-2126 charles.yarbrough@atmosenergy.com "'r~. ,... '~"1 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION STATEMENT OF RIDER GCR JUNE 2007 (REVISED) PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GAS UTILITIES DOCKET NO. 9670 Line Part (a) - Mid- Tex Commodity Costs 1 2 3 Estimated Gas Cost per Unit: Estimated City Gate Deliveries: Estimated Gas Cost: $10.0680 4,135,329 $41,634,496 4 5 6 Lost and Unaccounted For Gas % Estimated Lost and Unaccounted tor Gas Total Estimated City Gate Gas Cost: 2.5932% $1,079,660 $42,714,156 7 Estimated Sales Volume: 4,881,638 8 Estimated Gas Cost Factor - (EGCF) $8.7500 9 10 11 Reconciliation Factor - (RF): Taxes (TXS): Adjustment - (ADJ): $!!JJOOOO W 1(J)lJOO rooooo Btu Factor 1.024 Per MMBtu $8.5449 12 Gas Cost Recovery Factor - (GCRF) $8.7500 per Met Part (b) - Pipeline Services Costs Rate I - Industrial Service Total Rate R - Residential Rate C - Commercial Rate T - Transportation I 100.0000% 62.7262% 29.7022% 7.5717% $3,015,736 $1,891,656 $895,739 $228,342 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,015,736 $1,891,656 $895,739 $228,342 $1,679,268 $374,293 $462,871 $842,103 ($1.689.156) ($1.520.639) ($531.587) $363.070 ($9,888) ($1,146,346) ($68,716) $1,205,173 $3,005,849 $745,310 $827,023 $1,433,516 1,990,301 Mct 2,643,518 Mct 4,016,052 MMBtu $0.3745 Met $0.3128 Mct $0.3569 MMBtu $8.7500 Met $8.7500 Mct $8.5449 $9.1245 Mct $9.0628 Met Rate 1- $8.9018 MMBtu Rate T - $0.3569 MMBtu Fixed Costs 13 Fixed Costs Allocation Factors [Set in GUD 9670] 14 a. Current Month Fixed Costs ot Pipeline Services 15 b. Plus: Second Prior Month Recovery Adjustment 16 Net Fixed Costs Commoditv Costs 17 a. Estimated Commodity Cost ot Pipeline Services 18 b. Plus: Second Prior Month Recovery Adjustment 19 Net Commodity Cost ot Pipeline Services 20 Total Estimated Pipeline Costs (Line 16 + Line 19) 21 Estimated Billed Volumes 22 Pipeline Cost Factor (PCF) [Line 20/ Line 21] 23 Gas Cost Recovery Factor - (GCRF) [Line 12] 24 Rider GCR 1 Industrial Service and Transportation are reported in MMBtu. An MMBtu conversion tactor ot 1.024 is used.