Loading...
05 P&Z Report & Minutes REGULAR MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF PARIS. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 107 E. KAUFMAN STREET PARIS. TEXAS MONDAY. NOVEMBER 5. 2007 5:30 O'CLOCK P.M. AGENDA 1. Call meeting to order and roll call. 2. Approval of minutes from previous meetings. (October 1, 2007) 3. Public hearing to consider the petition of Omega Healthcare Investors for a change in zoning from an Agricultural District (A) to a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.2 (MF-2) on a 6.5708 acre tract of land, being a part of the Reddin Russell Survey, Abstract No. 786, and being number 2885 Stillhouse Road. 4. Consideration of and action on the petition of Omega Healthcare Investors for a change in zoning from an Agricultural District (A) to a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.2 (MF-2) on a 6.5708 acre tract of land, being a part ofthe Reddin Russell Survey, Abstract No. 786, and being number 2885 Slillhouse Road. 5. Public hearing to consider the petition of Central Presbyterian Church for a change in zoning from a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.1 (MF-1) to a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.1 (MF-1) with a Specific Use Permit (5) Cemetery or Mausoleum on Lot 5, City Block 181, being number 309 Church Street. 6. Consideration of and action on the petition of Central Presbyterian Church for a change in zoning from a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.1 (MF-1) to a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.1 (MF-1) with a Specific Use Permit (5) Cemetery or Mausoleum on Lot 5, City Block 181, being number 309 Church Street. 7. Public hearing to consider the Site Plan of Lot 4, Block 8, Springlake Addition, being number 230 N. Collegiate Drive. 8. Consideration of and action on the Site Plan of Lot 4, Block 8, Springlake Addition, being number 230 N. Collegiate Drive. I ,I, I :(, 9. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Petco Plaza 313 Addition, being number 3900 Lamar Avenue. 10. Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block A, Main Street 250 Addition, 2240 N. Main Street. 11. Discussion of and Possible action on establishing development standards for the city of Paris. 12. Adjournment. POSTED: BY: MONDAY, OCTOBER 29,2007, AT /D.4ottf{j CITY HALL ANNEX BULLETIN BOARD {JJt j; j~ & Atu Nl ~""Q~~~" WITNESS: EXTERIOR CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Au new non-residential and multi-family buildings constructed in the City of Greenville must comply with the City's ordinance on Exterior Construction Requirements and Standards. ACCEPTABLE MASONRY MATERIAL Acceptable Masonry Wall Construction is defined as and shall include the following: · Stone Material: Masonry construction using stone material may consist of granite, marble, limestone, slate, river rock, and other hard and durable naturally occurring all weather stone. Cut stone and dimensioned stone techniques are acceptable. · Brick Material: Brick material used for masonry construction shall be hard fired (kiln fired) clay or slate material. Unfired or under fired clay, sand, or shale brick are not permitted. · Concrete Masonry Units: Concrete masonry units used for exterior masonry construction shall have an indented, hammered, split face, or other similar architectural finish. Lightweight concrete block or cinder block construction is not acceptable masonry wall construction. · Concrete Panel Construction: Concrete finish or pre-cast panel (tilt wall) construction shall be painted, fluted, exposed aggregate, or other similar architectural concrete finish. Smooth or untextured concrete finishes are not acceptable. · Stucco or similar exterior finishing system. · Exterior Insulating Finishing System (EFIS) or similar exterior finishing system. · Glass Wall Construction: Glass walls shall include glass curtain walls or glass block construction. Glass curtain wall shall be defined as an exterior wall which carries no structural loads, and which may consist of the combination of metal, glass, or other surfacing material supported in a metal framework. CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS The standards and criteria contained within this section are deemed to be minimum standards and shall apply to all new, altered or repaired construction occurring within the City. · Non-residential Structures (Excluding Churches) Major Thoroughfares and Collector Streets. Non-residential structures constructed on lots that have frontage on U.S. Highway 69 (Joe Ramsey Blvd.), Business U.S. Highway 69 from U.S" Highway 69 to Interstate 30, State Highway 34 (Wesley Street) from the South City Limits to Pickett Street, Interstate Highway 30, FM 1570; shall have at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the total exterior walls above grade level, excluding doors and windows, constructed of acceptable masonry wall construction, in accordance with the City's building code and fire prevention code. Building facades which face or side any public street or single family zoning district, shall have one-hundred percent (100%) of the total exterior walls above grade level, excluding doors and windows, constructed of acceptable masonry wall construction. Downtown. All structures in the area designated as the Central Area (CA) zoning district are subject to the exterior design requirements in S 11.205 of the Code of Ordinances. All Other Locations. The exterior walls on all other non-residential structures which face or side any public street or single family zoning district, and at least 20% of the length of side elevations extending back from the front elevation, shall have at least eighty percent (80%) of the total exterior walls above grade level, excluding doors and windows, constructed of acceptable masonry wall construction, in accordance with the City's building code and fire prevention code. · Multi-family Uses All principal multi-family buildings and structures shall have at least ninety percent (90%) of the total exterior walls above grade level, excluding doors and windows, constructed of acceptable masonry wall construction, in accordance with the City's building code and fire prevention code.. . Churches The exterior walls on churches, which face or side any public street, and at least 20% of the length of side elevations extending back from the front elevation, shall have at least eighty percent (80%) of the total exterior walls above grade level, excluding doors and windows, constructed of acceptable masonry wall construction, in accordance with the City's building code and fire prevention code. · Exterior Metal Walls Exterior metal walls shall include profiled panels, deep ribbed panels, and concealed fastener systems. Exterior finish shall be film laminated or baked on enamel painted to the wall manufacturer's standards. The use of corrugated metal, plastic, or fiberglass panels is prohibited. The use of galvanized, aluminum coated, zinc-aluminum coated, or unpainted exterior metal finish is prohibited. EXEMPTIONS The following are exempt from the provisions of this Ordinance: · Single Family and Two Family homes and accessory buildings. · Barns and farm accessory buildings if such buildings are used solely for agricultural purposes. · Manufactured or Mobile homes otherwise lawfully existing under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. · Remodeling activities that result in less than 50% of the modification or replacement of the existing structure. · Temporary buildings used for construction offices, and permitted for a limited period of time by the Building Official. · Industrial buildings located in Light Industrial (I-I) or Heavy Industrial (1-2) zoning districts, that are used for manufacturing, or other related industrial uses. · All buildings located in the Majors Field Addition. · Building projects for which a building permit or site plan approval was formally applied prior to September 13, 2000. EXCEPTIONS Strict adherence to these rules shall not be such as to prevent architectural creativity. Requests for exceptions based on architectural design and creativity, and compatibility with surrounding developed properties, may be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission who shall submit their recommendations to the City Council for approval. The Director of Community Development may approve a waiver or exception to these requirements for additions to existing buildings that were previously exempt from this Ordinance; where the size of such additions do not exceed 25% of the size of the existing structure, or 2500 square feet, whichever is less. The Planning and Zoning Commission normally meets the third Monday of every month. All requests for exceptions must be submitted to the Community Development Office at least 21 days before the meeting, and must include 14 copies of the following: · A detailed site plan that includes all relevant information required in the City's Site Plan Review Checklist. · Color renderings of all building elevations. · Color photographs of similarly constructed buildings. · A detailed description of all exterior construction materials, including the percentage of the exterior walls covered by each material. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF PARIS - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 107 E. KAUFMAN STREET PARIS. TEXAS MONDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2007 5:30 O'CLOCK P.M. 1. The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission on Monday, October 1, 2007, was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Reeves Hayter. A. The following members were present: B. Reeves Hayter, Chairman Curtis Fendley, Vice-Chairman Barbara Forrest Richard Hunt Fran Neeley (arrived late) Darin Manning C. The following members were absent: Bobby L. Myers Brad Archer Benny Plata D. Lisa Wright, Community Development Director, was also present. 2. Approval of minutes from previous meetings. Motion to approve the minutes of the September 4,2007, meeting was made by Curtis Fendley, seconded by Barbara Forrest. Motion carried 5-0. - Fran Neeley arrived. 3. Public Hearing to consider the petition of Kenneth E. Tucker for a change in zoning from a One-Family Dwelling District No. 3 (SF-3) to a One Familv District No. 3 rSF-3J with a Specific Use Permit (39) Mobile Home on Lot 4, Block 7, Belmont Addition, being number 1221 Fairfax. The public hearing was declared open. A. The following individuals spoke in favor of the petition: Kenneth E. Tucker, 859 13th Street N.E., stated that he wants to improve the area. He presented photos to the Commissioners of the proposed mobile home. Mr Tucker further stated that the house that is there now will be torn down and he and his family will be living in the mobile home. B. There was no opposition present. C. The public hearing was declared closed. II 4. Consideration of and action on the petition of Kenneth E. Tucker for a change in zoning from a One-Family Dwelling District No. 3 (SF-3) to a One-Family Dwellinq District No.3 (SF-3) with a Specific Use Permit (39) Mobile Home on Lot 4, Block 7, Belmont Addition, being number 1221 Fairfax. Lisa Wright, Community Development Director, showed photos of the neighborhood and the existing homes in the area. Reeves Hayter stated that it is a nice, clean neighborhood, and there is an effort to upgrade the area. He further stated that he didn't care for the idea of putting a mobile home in this neighborhood because the neighborhood looks like it is making a comeback. Motion was made by Curtis Fendley, seconded by Barbara Forrest, to deny the petition and request the City Council to put a moratorium on mobile homes until a new ordinance can be adopted. Motion carried 6-0. 5. Public hearing to consider the Site Plan of Lot 4, Block 8, Springlake Addition, being number 230 N. Collegiate. The public hearing was declared open. A. The following individuals spoke in favor of the petition: Louis Yates, contractor, 1815 Majestic Drive, stated that the building was previously 2,400 square feet and has been reduced to 1,782 square feet with nine designated parking spaces. The change was made because they didn't have enough parking spaces for the square footage. He further stated they worked closely with the City staff to get to this point. B. The following individuals spoke in favor of the petition: Brenda Hampton, 238 28th Street N.E., stated that everything is located at the back and she wants to make sure there is never a drive-through put there. Edith Dunn, 257 28th Street N.E., stated that she is against a drive- through period because 28th Street is too narrow. The drive-through can cause traffic problems and she is worried about the kids. None of the other businesses have a drive-through that comes out onto 28th Street. Yvonne Bowers, 214 28th Street N.E., stated that she wants to put the dumpster and loading zone in the front part of the lot. Louis Yates stated there will not be a dumpster, it is a poly cart. Yvonne Bowers stated that Louis Yates told her he could not guarantee there will never be a drive-through on this property. What do they need to do to have it denied again? C. The public hearing was declared closed. 6. Consideration of and action on the Site Plan of Lot 4, Block 8, Springlake Addition, being number 230 N. Collegiate Drive. Reeves Hayter stated there II has been some talk about the front of businesses on Collegiate, and this business is going to have a stucco and stone front. However, the principal visible wall will be metal. Darin Manning stated there are brick and sheet metal buildings all along Collegiate already. Fran Neeley stated that, when Daylight Donuts is busy in the morning, Collegiate is backed up. She said she can just envision 28th Street being completed closed because of traffic if there is a driveway through the business. Motion was made by Curtis Fendley, seconded by Darin Manning, to approve site plan. Motion carried 5-1. 7. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat of Lot 1, Block A, Chantu Addition CB296, being number 495 35th Street N.E. Motion was made by Cl,Jrtis Fendley, seconded by Richard Hunt, to approve plat subject to City Engineer's recommendations. Motion carried 6-0. Lisa Wright reminded the Chans not to remove any trees until they received their final plat. 8. Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of Lot 1 and 2, Block A, Baxley Addition CB222, being number 196 and 198 20th Street N.E. Motion was made by Fran Neeley, seconded by Darin Manning, to approve the plat subject to City Engineer's recommendations. Motion carried 6-0. 9. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat of Lot 1, Block A, Neilson Building Addition 179-A, being number 210 1st Street S.E. Motion was made by Richard Hunt, seconded by Fran Neeley, to recuse Reeves Hayter from items 9 and 10. Motioncarried 5-0. Motion was made by Richard Hunt, seconded by Darin Manning, to approve the plat. Motion carried 5-0. 10. Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block A, Neilson Building Addition 179-A, being number 210 1st Street S.E. Motion was made by Fran Neeley, seconded by Barbara Forrest, to approve the plat. Motion carried 5-0. Motion was made by Richard Hunt, seconded by Fran Neeley, to return Reeves Hayter to the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. 11. Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of Lot 11, Block 251, Main Street Town Homes Addition 251, being number 1715 North Main Street. Motion was made by Fran Neeley, seconded by Darin Manning, to approve the plat subject to City Engineer's recommendations. Motion carried 6-0. 12. Discussion of and Possible action on setting workshop dates to review proposed changes to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Fran Neeley stated she will be out of commission until after Thanksgiving. Darin Manning reminded the Commission that he will be leaving for the military next week and will gone until November 9 and again starting January 3. The Commission set a workshop date for Tuesday October 9, 2007, at 5:00 p.m. The Commission discussed the need for a future agenda item to review and recommend development standards so that the City can have more control II II over Planned Development Districts. There are no guidelines for the staff, the P&Z, of the City Council to use. Lisa Wright stated that many cities already have these done, so she can get copies for the Commission members to start reviewing to give them some ideas of what the standards generally contain. 13. The meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. APPROVED THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2007 Reeves Hayter, Chairman MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: CITY MANAGER LISA A. WRIGHT, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 6, 2007 SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING RECOMMENDATION AND REPORT 1. Consideration of and action on the petition of Omega Healthcare Investors for a change in zoning from an AQricultural District (A) to a Multiple-Familv DwellinQ District No.2 (MF-2) on a 6.5708 acre tract of land, being a part of the Reddin Russell Survey, Abstract No. 786, and being number 2885 Stillhouse Road. APPROVED 6 AYES NO OPPOSITION PRESENT o NAYS 2. Consideration of and action on the petition of Central Presbyterian Church for a change in zoning from a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.1 (MF-1) to a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No. 1 (MF-1) with a Specific Use Permit (5) Cemetery or Mausoleum on Lot 5, City Block 181, being number 309 Church Street. APPROVED NO OPPOSITION PRESENT 7 AYES 0 NAYS SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO APPLY ONLY TO THAT PORTION OF THE LOT KNOWN AS THE ASH GARDEN 3. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Petco Plaza 313 Addition, being number 3900 Lamar Avenue. APPROVED 7 A YES SUBJECT TO ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS o NAYS 4. Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block A, Main Street 250 Addition, being number 2240 N. Main Street. APPROVED 6 AYES o NAYS 5. Consideration of and action on the Site Plan of Lot 4, Block 8, Spring lake Addition, being number 230 N. Collegiate Drive. APPROVED 4 AYES OPPOSITION PRESENT 3 NAYS II MINUTES REGULAR MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF PARIS - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 107 E. KAUFMAN STREET PARIS. TEXAS MONDAY. NOVEMBER 5. 2007 5:30 O'CLOCK P.M. 1. The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission on Monday, November 5, 2007, was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Reeves Hayter. A. The following members were present: Reeves Hayter, Chairman Curtis Fendley, Vice-Chairman Bobby Myers Barbara Forrest Richard Hunt Brad Archer Benny Plata B. The following members were absent: Fran Neeley Darin Manning C. Lisa Wright, Community Development Director, was also present. 2. Approval of minutes from previous meetings. Motion to approve the minutes of the October 1, 2007, and October 9,2007, meetings was made by Curtis Fendley, seconded by Benny Plata. Motion carried 7-0. Motion was made by Barbara Forrest, seconded by Richard Hunt to recuse Reeves Hayter. Motion carried 6-0. 3. Public Hearing to consider the petition of Omega Healthcare Investors for a change in zoning from an Agricultural District (A) to a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.2 (MF-2) on a 6.5708 acre tract of land, being a part of the Reddin Russell Survey, Abstract No. 786, and being number 2885 Stillhouse Road. The public hearing was declared open. A. The following individuals spoke in favor of the petition. John Griffin, Omega Healthcare, spoke in favor of the petition. This building will replace the skilled nursing facility at Stone and Lewis. It will have 120 beds, and they will transfer residents from their old facility when the new building is completed. Thomas E. Haynes, seller, spoke in favor of the petition. Mr. Haynes stated this will be an asset to the area. There is a Senior apartment complex across the road and an assisted living and hospital in the vicinity. The property is currently zoned Agricultural, so this change in II zoning will also mean added income for the taxing entities. B. There was no opposition present. C. The public hearing was declared closed. 4. Consideration of and action on the petition of Omega Healthcare Investors for a change in zoning from an Agricultural District (A) to a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.2 (MF-2) on a 6.5708 acre tract of land, being a part of the Reddin Russell Survey, Abstract No. 786, and being number 2885 Stillhouse Road. Motion was made by Bobby Myers, seconded by Benny Plata, to approve the request. Motion carried 6-0. 10. Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block A, Main Street 250 Addition, being number 2240 N. Main Street. Motion was made by Brad Archer, seconded by Bobby Myers, to approve the plat subject to the City Engineer's recommendation. Motion carried 6-0. Motion was made by Richard Hunt, seconded by Brad Archer, to return Reeves Hayter to the meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 5. Public hearing to consider the petition of Central Presbyterian Church for a change in zoning from a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.1 (MF-1) to a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.1 (MF-1) with a Specific Use Permit (5) Cemetery or Mausoleum on Lot 5, City Block 181, being number 309 Church Street. The public hearing was declared open. A. The following individuals spoke in favor of the petition. Tim Davenport Herbst, 309 Church, Pastor, spoke in favor of the petition. Pastor Herbst stated they want to put a columbarium in the ash garden. They had received approval from the City in 1987, but never did it, so they are now asking for official approval. Construction will consist of a concrete pad behind a brick wall, 36" wide by 48" tall, above the ground. The Church is asking for the zoning change only on the ash garden. Sally McEwin, Church Member, spoke in favor of the petition. Ms. McEwin stated that the area is a 35' by 35' ash garden bounded by the building, a wall, and trees. Initially, there were to be 36 niches. B. There was no opposition present. C. The public hearing was declared closed. 6. Consideration of and action on the petition of Central Presbyterian Church for a change in zoning from a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.1 (MF-1) to a Multiple-Family Dwelling District No.1 (MF-1) with a Specific Use Permit (5) Cemetery or Mausoleum on Lot 5, City Block 181, being number 309 Church Street. Motion was made by Curtis Fendley, seconded by Richard Hunt, to approve the zoning change request applicable to the ash garden only. Motion carried 7-0. 7. Public hearing to consider the Site Plan of Lot 4, Block 8, Springlake Addition, being number 230 N. Collegiate Drive. The public hearing was declared open. A. The following individuals spoke in favor of the petition. Plug Clem, Attorney for the Chans, 100 N. Main, spoke in favor of the petition. Mr. Clem stated they are still proposing an exit onto 28th. He said that Collegiate is probably the busiest street in Paris. He further stated this is a narrow lot, so it's critical that there be access to 28th street for safety sake. There was very little traffic flow on 28th street, but the traffic flow on Collegiate is what will become dangerous. Mr. Clem added that this has been going on for a long time and costing the parties a lot of money. Texoma has an entrance that goes all the way through. Louis Yates, 1815 Majestic, stated they have met all City codes and requirements, and he is asking for approval. B. The following individuals spoke in opposition of the petition. Sybil Colson, 819 Lamar Ave., stated she owns property at 28th Street and Price and speaks for the homeowners on 28th street. The Chans are trying to put too much on one lot, and everyone else in the area is on more than one lot. Ms. Colson further stated the exit will be directly against someone's driveway. She asked if Collegiate is so busy, why are they building there? There is no assurance that a donut shop won't go in. Ms. Colson reiterated they are trying to squeeze too much on a single lot. Brenda Hampton, 238 28th Street N.E., stated she is not opposed to rear parking but is opposed to drive through that comes out at her driveway. She stated it is hard enough to get onto Collegiate, but now she can't get out of her own driveway. Ms. Hampton read a letter from Edith Dunne of 257 28th Street N.E. opposing the petition. Ms. Dunn stated the street is 25 feet wide, and their guests already have to park in the street. Yvonne Bowers, 214 28th Street N.E., stated the Chans knew Collegiate was busy when they bought the property. The rear parking and the driveway will be disruptive. C. The public hearing was declared closed. 8. Consideration of and action on the Site Plan of Lot 4, Block 8, Springlake Addition, being number 230 N. Collegiate Drive. Curtis Fendley stated that Screen Graphics and Texoma both park in the back. he said there is a gravel driveway, bu it may not be intended for through traffic. Mr. Fendley further stated that he can't see P&Z discriminating against this applicant when business at the Tejas Plaza empty onto Price. Bobby Myers stated he doesn't see how we can deny access to a public street. Reeves Hayter stated he has no problem with parking there, but he does have II a problem with the drive through. He is concerned about future uses. If the property is sold, a drive through could be a selling point. He further stated that this is too much building to put on that lot. Also, with regard to street access, P&Z has that right under planned development, so we can approve or deny the site plan. Mr. Hayter also expressed concern that, by doing this, we are condemning the neighborhood to a commercial use. If traffic on Collegiate is problem, it goes back to the building being to big for this lot. Mr. Fendley asked if they could designate the drive access as private to keep through traffic down to a minium. Lisa Wright stated that you can designate it anything you want; however, we cannot control traffic on a private drive. Reeves Hayter asked the Chans is was not possible to turn the building and move the rear parking to the in front, and Louis Yates stated that the building was too large to allow for that. Curtis Fendley said that we approved it already, and if the Council doesn't want to approve it, they should just deny it instead of sending it back to P&Z for us to deny. If we start doing this, we will do it on every item. Motion was made by Curtis Fendley, seconded by Bobby Myers, to approve the site plan. Motion carried 4-3. 9. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Petco Plaza 313 Addition, being number 3900 Lamar Avenue. Motion was made by Curtis Fendley, seconded by Bobby Myers, to approve the plat subject to the City Engineer's recommendation. Motion carried 7-0. 11. Discussion of and possible action on establishing development standards for the City of Paris. Lisa Wright advised the Commission that she was providing a sample of the design standards from Greenville just to give an example of some of the things cities are doing. She stated that it has been an issue recently because she and Shawn Napier, as well as P&Z and the Council, have had no guidance on handling the more intricate details on planned development properties. She reminded the Commission what Mr. Yates had just said about the Chans meeting all the codes. She stated that this meant only that they included on their site plan all the items from a checklist of what site plans must have; however, this checklist has nothing to do with street access, building appearance, neighborhood impact, etc. She said she and Shawn could use their own taste to handle these, but that would be subjective and unfair. She recommended that now would be a good time to look at these since the Code Enforcement Task Force was in full swing. The consensus ofthe Commission was thatthe City really needed to consider adopting something along these lines so that we could establish how we want our community to look. Reeves Hayter stated he would rather put this on a future agenda, because we need to put the Comprehensive Plan and mobile home ordinance first. He said we are behind on the objectives we originally set, and we don't want to keep getting further behind. Brad Archer stated this is important, and we're so far behind other cities that we need to do something soon. Curtis Fendley stated it will affect what the community looks like in the next 50 years, so we need to look at this carefully. 12. The meeting adjourned at 6:18 p.m. APPROVED THIS 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2007 Reeves Hayter, Chairman