2001-106-RES DESIGNATING CERTAIN OFFICIALS AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR/ACTING BEHALF OF COP FOR PURPOSE OF TRPA
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-106
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS,
PARIS, TEXAS, DESIGNATING CERTAIN OFFICIALS AS BEING
RESPONSIBLE FOR AND ACTING FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
IN DEALING WITH THE TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN THE TEXAS RECREATION
AND PARKS ACCOUNT (TRPA) GRANT PROGRAM; CERTIFYING THE
CITY IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE PROGRAM ASSISTANCE;
CERTIFYING THE CITY'S MATCHING SHARE IS READILY
AVAILABLE; ACCEPTING SAID GRANT AWARD UPON NOTICE
THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF ANY AND ALL
DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SAID GRANT UPON
NOTICE THEREOF; DEDICATING THE PROPOSED SITE FOR
PERMANENT PUBLIC PARK AND RECREATIONAL USES; MAKING
OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature has approved the Texas Recreation and Parks Account
(TRPA) Grant Program, hereinafter called Program (Section 24 of the Parks & Wildlife Code),
for the purpose of allowing the political subdivisions of the State of Texas to participate in the
Program; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Paris, Paris, Texas, is fully eligible to receive assistance under
said Program, and the City Council is desirous of processing a grant application with the Texas
Parks and Wildlife Department for the Paris Sports Complex Project in the amount of$500,OOO.00,
with $500,000.00 to be provided by the City of Paris in the form of cash; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS,
TEXAS:
Section 1. That the findings set out in the preamble to this resolution are hereby in all
things approved.
Section 2. That an application be made to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for
a Texas Recreation and Parks Account (TRPA) Grant in the amount of $500,000.00, with
$500,000.00 to be provided by the City of Paris in the form of cash.
Section 3. That the City of Paris hereby certifies it is eligible to receive assistance under
the Texas Recreation and Parks Account (TRPA) Program.
Section 4. That the City of Paris hereby certifies the matching share for this application
is readily available at this time.
Section 5. That the Texas Recreation and Parks Account (TRPA) Grant for the Paris
Sports Complex Project be accepted upon notice of award of the same by the Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department.
Section 6. That the City Manager be, and he is hereby, appointed as the Authorized
Official of said project and is authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City of Paris,
the application for grant in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 7. That the Public Works Director be, and he is hereby, appointed as Project
Director and is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City of
Paris, all reports, communications, assurances, and documents necessary for the completion of
said project.
Section 8. That the Director of Finance be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to
serve as the Financial Officer for said project and to receive and distribute funds for the Public
Works Department's participation in the Texas Recreation and Parks Account (TRPA) Grant
Program.
Section 9. That the City Manager, the Public Works Director, and the Finance Director
be authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City of Paris, any and all documents
necessary for acceptance of said grant upon notice of award thereof by the Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department, under the terms and conditions and in the form approved by the City
Attorney.
Section 10. That the Paris Sports Complex is hereby dedicated (or wil1 be dedicated upon
completion of the proposed acquisition) for public park and recreation purposes in perpetuity.
Section 11. That this resolution shall become effective from and after its date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of July, 2001.
~~
ATTEST:
Mattie Cunningham, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPLICATION FORM - PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
TEXAS RECREATION & PARKS ACCOUNT PROGRAM
I.
SPONSOR:
CITY OF PARIS
A.
Address:
Post Office Box 9037
Paris, Texas 75460
B. Federal Tax Identification Code: 75-6000635
C.
Contact & Phone Number:
Terry Townsend, Public Works Director
903-785-751 I (phone)
903-784-1798 (fax)
II.
PROJECT NAME:
Paris Sports Complex
III. PROJECT LOCATION:
A. City & County: Paris, Lamar County
B. State Legislative Districts:
I. Senate: #1
2. House: #3
C. Federal Congressional District: #1
IV. FUNDS REQUESTED
A. Sponsor (50%):
$
500,000.00
B. State (50%):
$
500,000.00
C. Total Project:
$
1,000,000.00
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
To the best afmy knowledge and belief, all documentation in this application is true and correct, the application has been duly authorized by the
governing body of the sponsor, and the sponsor agrees to comply with all program rules and procedures if grant assistance is awarded.
Signature of Official Authorized in Resolntion
Michael E. Malone. City Manager 903-785-7511
Typed Name, Title and Telephone Number
Date
EXHIBIT A. 1
A... r'LICANTS CERTIFICATION & PROGRAM ftSSURAN'CES
TEXAS RECREATION & PARKS ACCOUNT PROGRAM
As the duty authorized representative of the sponsor I certifY that the sponsor:
I. Has complied with all pertinent local and state laws, and Texas Recreation & Parks Account Program (TRP A)
requirements requiring public hearings.
2. Has the required proportionate share of funds available and sufficient for the project as required by Section 13.309 of the
Parks & Wildlife Code.
3. Will maintain and operate areas acquired or developed with TRPA assistance at sponsor expense as required by Section
13.309 of the Parks & Wildlife Code.
4. Will permanently dedicate for public park and recreation use all project area(s) which receive TRPA assistance, as
required by Chapter 640.1.2 ofTRP A Grants Manual Guidelines.
5. Has the legal authority to apply for TRPA assistance, " the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure
proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application.
6. Will give the State of Texas, hereafter referred to as "State", through any authorized representative, access to and the right
to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the assistance; and will establish a proper accounting system
in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives.
7. Will not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title, or other interest in the site and
facilities without permission and instructions from the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department hereafter referred to as the
"Department" . Will record the State interest in the title of real property in accordance with Department directives and will
include a covenant in the title of real property acquired in whole or in part with TRP A assistance funds to assure
nondiscrimination during the useful life of the project.
8. Will comply with the requirements of the Department with regard to the drafting, review and approval of construction plans
and specifications.
9. Will provide and maintain competent engineering supervision at the construction site to ensure that the complete work
conforms with the approved plans and specifications.
10. Will furnish quarterly progress reports and such other information as may be required by the Department.
II. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval from the Department.
12. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the
appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest or personal gain.
13. Will comply with all State and Federal statues relating to non-discrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P. L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national
origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.c. ~~ 1681-1683, and 1685-1686) which
prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.c. ~
794) which prohibit discrimination of the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42
U.S.c. ~~ 6101-6107) which prohibits discrinrination on the basis of age; (e) any other non-discrimination provisions in the
specific statute(s) under which application for TRPA assistance is being made, and (1) the requirements of any other
nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application.
14. Will comply with the flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973
(P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood
insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more.
(Page I of 2)
15. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality
control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P. L. 91-1900) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) protection
of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (c) evaluation of flood hazards in flood plains in accordance with EO 11988; (d) assurance of project
consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C .99
1451 et seq.); (e) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of
1955, as amended (42 U.S.c. 9 7401 et seq.); and (I) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended, (P.L. 93-205).
16. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1966 (16 U.S.c. 99 127 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential
components of the national wild and scenic rivers system.
17. Will assist the Department in assuring compliance with Texas Antiquities Code (Rev. 9-1-87).
18. Will cause to be perfonned the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984.
19. Will comply with all provisions of the "Summary of Guidelines for Administration of Local Park Grant Assistance Projects".
20. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other State and Federal laws, regulations and policies governing this program.
City of Paris. Texas
Sponsor Name
Paris Snorts Comolex
Project Name
Signature of Official Authorized in Resolution
Michael E. Malone. Citv Manaller
Print or Type Name and Title of Official
Date
(Page 2 of 2)
Assurance of Elil!ibilitv
For Usinl! Soonsor/Publiclv-Owned Land as the Local Matchinl! Share
On behalf ofthe City of Paris, Texas, I hereby certify that all property described below has never been
dedicated, platted, managed or acquired for public park or recreation use, and that said property is
eligible to serve as the grant matching share for Paris Sports Complex, pursuant to Texas Recreation &
Parks Account Program guidelines. (Insert property description - include the general location,
acreage and legal description.)
As the official representative of the project sponsor, I fully understand that the false certification of
said assurance will cause the aforementioned project to be withdrawn from consideration, and that
future eligibility for grant consideration may be jeopardized.
Signature of Official Authorized in Resolution
Michael E. Malone, City Manager
.
Date
.. ~ .
._.-0.
"
RESOLUTION NO. 9S-0l R
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris did heretofore in Resolution No.
95-002, authorize the procurement of professional engineering services for the preparation
of a community park master plan; and,
WHEREAS, the City staff, in cooperation wilh the consulting engineering firm,
The C. T. Brannon Corporation, completed the preparation of the PARKS AND
RECREATION MASTERPLAN FOR THE CITY OF PARIS, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit A, which inventories park and recreational facilities in the City
of Paris and identifies and states goals and objectives for the recreation program for the
City; and,
WHEREAS, the preparation process included three public hearings conducted in
three different locations within the City of Paris on January 12, 17, and 18, 1995; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council, with the assistance of the staff, has reviewed the
plan and finds that it is appropriate that such plan be adopted; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, that
the PARKS AND RECREATION MASTERPLAN FOR THE CITY OF PARIS,
attached hereto as Exhibit A, be, and the same is hereby adopted as the master plan for
park and recreation facilities in the City of Paris.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of January, 1995.
ft4/L
Don Shelton, Mayor
ATTEST:
w-v-
Thomas E. Haynes, Assistant Cit Clerk
~_ t
.
Parks and Recreation Masterplan
for the
City of Paris, Texas
Prepared By:
Dick Boots, Director of Community Facilities
City of Paris
January, 1995
Terry Brannon, P.E.
The Brannon Corporation
Local Masterplan and Needs Assessment
for the
City of Paris, Texas
Parks and Recreation Facilities
Section 1 Introduction
The development of parks and recreational facilities by local government entities in recent
years has frequently been achieved through the use of grants-in-aid from the Texas Parks
and Wildlife Department using the old Local Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund and
the Land and Water Conservation Fund to match local effort in producing quality
facilities. The catch as it were was that the entity was required by the scoring system to
select projects on the basis of the Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan (TORP) amended in
1990. Through legislation passed in 1993 (H.B. 706), the Texas Recreation and Parks
Account Program was created which among other things does not require the use of the
TORP but allows local decision making.
The decision by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department not to use the Texas Outdoor
Recreation Plan any longer in establishing local park needs for cities such as Paris is a
two edged sword. First of all, the goal and priority selling decisions for outdoor recreation
facilities in the city now revert back to the city which can be an obvious enhancement of the
grants-in-aid programs from the city's perspective. On the other side of the coin, however,
the city is now faced with the requirement of doing the planning and prioritization it has not
had to do in the past.
Besides the obvious necessity brought about by competition for grants to score well, the
City of Paris has a need to compile information it already has in many city hall locations into
one document so that reasonable decisions can be made with respect to funding and
scheduling recreational opportunities in Paris. Further, the city has need to make
assessment of recreation needs and put them in priority order. Finally, the city has need
to establish a reasonable timetable over which improvements will be sought.
The purpose of this masterplan is to accomplish all these objectives.
-1-
Section 2 ScoDe of the Studv
The use of the term master plan is defined in many ways by many people. Therefore, this
section is dedicated to laying out the groundwork. . . the outline of the study. The following
elements are specifically included in this masterplan:
Section 3. Plan Development Process. This section describes the public
input sought, the results of those efforts, and how the masterplan came to
be formulated.
Section 4. Statement of Goals and Objectives. This section discusses
the local goals for parks and recreation and locally established criteria for
determining the availability of park and recreation facilities. Additionally, this
section describes in generic terms local standards for construction.
Section 5. Inventory. Perhaps the most usable information to be gleaned
from this masterplan is the inventory of recreational facilities which describes
city and school district owned outdoor recreational facilities alike.
Section 6. Needs assessment. From the public participation and the
inventory offacilities, a needs assessment is made showing in which areas
the park facilities are deficient and where improvement can be made. This
is the meat of the masterplan where the priorities for the city are set out in
writing.
Section 7. Plan implementation. The plan implementation sets forth the
methodology for meeting the needs determined in the section on needs
assessment. Both timing and financing are discussed and some cost
projections are made. The overall plan is broken down into manageable
phases.
Appendix. Supporting documents. The masterplan also contains exhibits
such as maps, charts, tables, and illustrations.
What elements are not included in this masterplan? This masterplan includes only the
facilities owned by the City of Paris, Paris Independent School District, some more
significant privately owned recreational facilities, and Paris Junior College's facilities. For
the most part only outdoor recreation activities are catalogued. Gymnasiums, weight lifting,
aerobics, and similar health club type facilities are not included.
This masterplan does not set forth site recommendations for developing or renovating
existing parks. No detailed space studies have been made nor extensive analysis of the
condition of equipment. No attempt was made to identify all aspects of handicapped
accessibility or non-accessibility. These items were beyond the scope of this study.
-2-
Section 3 - Plan Development Process
A. Public Participation
Development of good masterplans involves not only the ideas and creativity of the writers
but must also include the participation of recreational users. For some five years the
Council has been mulling over park improvements after receiving staff input concerning
upgrading and maintenance of parKs facilities. In 1994, the city staff made a conscientious
effort to contact members of sports organizations, service clubs, and interested
individuals. A committee was appointed by the Mayor in early December, 1994 and the
first committee meetings were held December 6th and January 3rd. Public notices were
filed and public hearings were held on four occasions in January, 1995 (9th, 12th, 17th, and
18th) to allow for public participation and input. To encourage participation, four local radio
stations aired public service announcements. A copy of the public service announcement
is included in the appendix at the rear of this document along with affidavits of publication
of notice in the local paper. Newspapers and radio media covered each of the public
hearings and articles were written and news items aired on the subject of the meetings.
The public hearings were held in different areas of the city for the convenience of
attendees.
B. Data Collection
The information forming the basis of this masterplan was gathered by city staff members
under the direction of Dick Boots, Director of Community Facilities, with cooperation of the
City Engineer's staff. Mr. Boots also met with committee members and conducted the
public hearings. He solicited public comment and received numerous letters in support of
various recreational needs.
C. Compilation
The City Council authorized the staff to secure the services of a professional engineer
experienced in the masterplanning, site planning and development of parks in the region.
The staff recommended and Council approved hiring Terry Brannon of The C. T. Brannon
Corporation, a Tyler consulting engineer. Brannon's role was to compile the data collected
and produce cost projections for various alternative projects under consideration.
D. Priority and Goal Setting
Responsible staff member for maintenance and operations within city owned parks in Paris
is Dick Boots, Director of Community Facilities. Using input received from the public, data
collected and compiled, and recommendations from the consultant, Mr. Boots had
oversight responsibility for the development of priorities contained in these plans. His
fifteen years with the city, most in his present capacity as Director of Community Facilities
-3-
qualifies him to make these determinations and recommend them to the City Council who
have ultimate authority over the plan.
Section 4 - Statement of Goals and Obiectives
. Provide a wide variety of outdoor recreation activities and facilities that
will reach all residents.
. Provide these facilities in all areas of the city to allow individuals an
opportunity to walk or ride a bicycle to and from parks facilities.
. Offer facilities and activities for special interest groups such as hike and
bike trails, Audubon facilities, fishing clubs, and other groups with special
needs.
. Provide handicapped accessibility to all park facilities, both new and
existing.
. Upgrade facilities in areas where there is a large number of "at-risk" youth.
. Renovate the two existing city lake areas; make them more accessible to
the public.
. Modernize old parks by replacing obsolete and damaged equipment.
. Acquire new land for park areas as it becomes available.
A. Facilities Concepts and Design Standards
Playground equipment The number one priority of City of Paris Parks Department is to
provide the most desirable and safest equipment possible. Metal and/or fiberglass
equipment will be specified for all projects. Due to problems experienced in the past with
wood play structures, wood equipment will not be specified because of its relatively short
life expectancy and some inherent safety problems, particularly with fasteners, in wood
equipment.
Tables, benches, bleachers. These items will be aluminum with metal framework in the
future.
Accessibility to the Handicapped. All new facilities will be made handicapped
accessible as they are renovated.
-4-
Playground surfacing. Surfaces around all playground equipment will be a material that
will cushion falls, wash easily and be suitable for wheel chair activity. In some cases, the
ground may be built up (like under slides for example) to reduce fall distances.
B. Standards of Construction
The City of Paris recognizes that quality and economics can sometimes, if not carefully
managed, be mutually exclusive goals. The old theory that you get what you pay for has
long been proven in park and recreation construction. The city should implement in all
construction of its park improvements guidelines which offer the most value for the dollar
spent, long term benefit, low maintenance costs, and certainly safety. It is an unfortunate
fact of life that sometimes aesthetics will give way to sturdiness. Likewise some projects
will go undeveloped because of their potential for vandalism attack, difficulty in maintaining
the project, high liability and risk, or outright lack of funds for staffing.
Restrooms - Under current policy the city does not construct restrooms in public parks
primarily due to the intense maintenance required and frequent vandalism which occurs in
public restrooms. The city staff recommends continuing this policy except in large, high
visibility areas and in parks where reservations are required and restrooms can be secured.
The city does construct concrete pads on which to set temporary toilet facilities during peak
seasons and special events.
Playgrounds - Playgrounds should be constructed using the latest state-of-the-art
equipment designed for safety and durability. Areas surrounding play areas should be
covered with at least 6 inches of pea gravel or similar non-compacting and resilient cover.
The city should replace obsolete or worn playground equipment immediately. Chains,
bolts, and other hardware must be inspected often and replaced if damaged or rusted.
Facilities should be inspected for safety at least twice per year and gravel replaced
frequently to maintain the proper thickness. A generic checklist should be developed which
can be used by park inspectors to identify and report needs. Files should be maintained
with these inspection reports as well as any citizen reports.
Handicapped accessibility - The city should select equipment which is, as much as
practicable, accessible to handicapped persons. Walks and trails should not exceed 2%
transverse and longitudinal slopes with wheel chair ramps should not exceed 1 inch rise
in 12 inches. Parks not so equipped should be furnished with paved parking areas at least
in the handicapped parking spaces.
Roads, drives and parking. The city requires all park roads, drives and parking facilities
to be constructed dust-free. Gravel parking areas are therefore not permitted.
Swimming pools - While the city does not currently operate any pools, certain guidelines
for pool construction should be observed. The National Swimming Institute promulgates
-5-
standards for construction such as minimal depths, slopes of bottoms, hand-hold
placement, ladder construction, diving safety, and other standards. The city should insist
these standards be adhered to strictly in the design and Construction of any future pools.
Further, operator training over such things as chlorine and other chemical usage, pool
filtering and backwash, cleaning, and electrical controls is a necessity. An operations and
maintenance manual for pools is highly recommended.
C. STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL FACILITIES'
Standard/1000 people
Comment
Facility (outdoor)
Baseball diamonds
Softball diamonds (and/or youth
diamonds) 1 per 3,000
Tennis courts 1 per 2,000
Basketball courts 1 per 500
Swimming pools - 25 m 1 per 10,000
- 50 m 1 per 20,000
Skating rinks (artificial) 1 per 30,000
Neighbor hood centers 1 per 10,000
Community centers 1 per 25,000
Outdoor theaters 1 per 20,000
Shooting ranges 1 per 50,000
Golf courses 1 per 25,000
Note: All of the above-mentioned facilities are desirable in small communities, even though their population
may actually be less than the standard. Every effort should be made to light all facilities for night use, thus
extending their utility.
1 per 6,000
Regulation 90 ft.
Best in battery of 4
Based on 15 sf of
water per 3% of pop.
MARTIN LUTHER KING PARK
1 Recreation Plannina and Desian, Seymour M. Gold, PhD., AICP published by McGraw-Hili,
1980
-6.
D. Specific Facility Standards (Elmhurst, lIIinois)2
I
Neiahborhood Plavlot
Size:
Service Area:
Location:
Usual facilities:
At least 1 acre preferred
1/4 mile or less
High density neighborhoods where private yards do not exist.
Paved areas; playground apparatus area for small children;
usually private responsibility.
Neiahborhood Park
Area per 1,000 persons: 3 acres
Size: 5-10 acres, not including parking
Service Area: 1/2 mile or as limited by geographical barriers
Location: Preferably adjacent to elementary schools or near the center
of the neighborhood.
Usual Facilities: Softballlbaseball fields, multiple-use paved areas, playground
apparatus areas, landscaped areas, and picnic areas. Small
field house. Minimum of automobile parking.
District Park
Area per 1,000 persons: 3 acres
Size: 10-30 acres
Service Area: 1 mile
Location: Preferably near the center of 4 to 5 neighborhoods.
Usual Facilities: Softballlbaseball fields, multiple-use paved areas, playground
apparatus areas, landscaped areas, and picnic areas. Small
field house. Minimum of automobile parking.
Communitv Swimmina Pools - One pool for every 20,000 persons. 8,000 to 10,000 sJ. of
water and double that for deck space.
Tennis Courts - One lighted for every 1,500 persons.
Softball Diamonds - 1 for every 3,000 persons, 1/2 lighted.
Camoina Facilities - 1 group camp for every 25,000 population. 500-1000 acres ideal size;
suitable for long term camping, school camping, and family camping.
The City of Paris should adopt these criteria or something similar as for development and
refurbishing of parks within the city.
2lbid, Gold, P 286.
-7-
E. Reducing Vandalism
Vandalism frequently occurs in poorly lit facilities during periods of low use. While it can
never be eliminated entirely there can be some steps taken to attempt reduction in
incidents of destruction of public property. Here are some suggestions:
. Build out of vandal resistant materials. Believe it or not wood is less frequently
vandalized than say concrete walls or concrete masonry. And, even when attacked,
wood siding is easier to replace and repaint than damaged block. Brick is less of
a target generally than block walls and natural stone or brick colors are usually less
susceptible than a painted block or brick wall. Metal walls are not generally
recommended.
. Build vandal-prone structures in high traffic areas of busy parks. Restrooms in
corners of small neighborhood parks will definitely be targets. A restroom on the
Loop or on another major artery will have fewer attacks.
. Use lexan or other bullet resistant fixtures with tamper proof screws. Use lamp
guards made of metal over exposed lamps in restrooms.
. Do not install mirrors, ceramic or plastic fixtures; do not expose conduits; do not
use trusses or rafters but rather solid steel or concrete roof supports not affording
a hand-hold. Conceal plumbing, use push button flush valves and automatic closing
faucets. Install flow regulators on water lines that shut the supply off automatically
if excessive flow persists.
. Repair vandalism immediately. Painted graffiti attracts more graffiti. Damaged
playground equipment is likely to become more damaged. Sometimes graffiti is
used to delineate gang territory boundaries. Remove these signs immediately.
. Infonn the public of acts of vandalism and just how much of their money it took to
clean up one individual attack. Offer standing rewards for turning in offenders.
-8-
Section 5 - Existina Facilities Inventorv
i
Provided in this section are separate descriptions of each park, a map of each park and
then a tabulation showing all parks and their facilities. In addition, this section will deal with
other recreational facilities at public schools, Paris Junior College and significant outdoor
recreational facilities that may be privately owned.
A. City Owned Lakes
Because of their size and importance to the recreational welfare of Paris citizenry, a brief
discussion is included here on Lake Gibbons and Lake Crook.
The smaller lake, 158-acre Lake Gibbons was developed by Texas Parks and Wildlife as
the Gambill Canadian Goose Refuge, a winter habitat, and in 1980 that facility was turned
over to the City of Paris. The City maintains a permanent population of Canadian geese
there for display. The city also plants some 25 acres of wheat each year to provide for the
migrating population of geese and feed 8,000 Ibs. of wheat each year. From November
until the geese leave in March, boats are kept off the lake. During other months, boats can
access the lake via the city's boat ramp. Boat motors are limited to 10 horsepower. A
fishing pier, approximately 50 feet long and 5 feet wide, is always accessible to the public.
Some picnicking facilities (3 tables) are avajJable and swimming is allowed from the shore
line on a 300-foot grass beach. Tl1ere are no improved beach facilities on the shoreline.
Unpaved parking areas have been constructed near the fishing, picnicking and swimming
areas. Other unpaved parking areas are constructed near the captive geese pens. The
city owns and controls all land adjacent to the shore, a total of 516 acres not under water
and no residential or commercial development has been allowed on city property by way
of long-term leases.
The larger lake is 972-acre Lake Crook. This lake serves as a back up raw water supply
for the city. The city's water treatment plant is located near the dam but the city has for
several years now taken the bulk of its water needs from Lake Pat Mayse some 15 miles
to the north of Paris. Lake Crook is used year round by boating and fishing enthusiasts.
There is a 8' x 120' fishing pier and a concrete public boat ramp. Unlike Lake Gibbons,
this lake has no motor horsepower restrictions. The city owns 1,745-acres of land
surrounding the lake and no other property owners adjoin the shoreline. The city has not
leased any of this property for residential or commercial development preferring to leave
it in its natural state. There are no public beaches or designated swimming areas on this
lake. Picnic facilities include 13 tables of 1930's vintage.
B. Public School Property
The City of Paris is generally overlapped by the Paris Independent School District which
includes most if not all of the property inside Loop 286. However, the North Lamar School
District and Chisum School District adjoin Paris on the north and south respectively.
-9-
<
_J
l<:
-,
/
...J
II
,
'"
co
'"
Q.
o
o
...J
~a 's'n
",0
CO
'"
Q.'
o
,---c
...J\
8 :j:j ~ )
o ~:ilD> ~\
..Icn>~::t6 o:::3f!: dID
~~~~Q~z~:iu~ >3 .'
:l!ffiQi!z:ruo::l:$~o I!:u
:PIlOZlLlO:)-F=1- 01.1 z
i5Ciw~O-'c~oo"" :)~
0(11I ::I z$5.! lI.1Il0~
"'u~wiil~ii:l!S>>~6::JUIll
:-;~ii:l::;:IIlIll;!1i2C)dZ!
~!!2u~F=S:~8!1a::!!lill8f
o~:i:':~~2:oli:li:~!i~~6
Zll.\Jc..,...."':rOOll.IIl.Il:IClO
z
~~
~
Q)
~
.~
I ccauow...Cl::t
_...:.:...:11%0
.
~ ~
lI:::.:z :lII:
.tj1.. .
a::l:w<Ca: C
o($aQ.lU:': :r::1Il.
ll.i::ltii~=::.:~~ 111:
11:9 ~iIl~~311.a::a.~~~
~!!! 11.I<<%1- It:<OlECA.
""31-I!.lUUI!iwG.<<wa.!I}
~ C::IZj:I-:':WOlllftl>
~ia.~~~=i;;~B~g
~:
!i ~~~~~.~.~=~~::
--
10
,~
o
~l
.~! Q)
1./ '-<
Paris ISO outdoor recreational facilities include:
1 ) Paris High School
2 practice football fields, unlighted
1 practice soccer field, unlighted
1 practice baseball field, unlighted
1 400-meter all-Weather oval running track
4 unlighted tennis courts
2) Crockett Middle School
4 tennis courts, unlighted
1 practice football field, unlighted
1 outdoor full-court basketball court
3) Travis Junior High School (Note: The city owns and maintains park facilities on
the Travis campus which are in addition to those facilities noted here!)
1 multipurpose hard surfaced play area
1 semi-improved oval running track
4) Aikin Elementary School
1 playground with combination wood and metal equipment, approximately 80'
x 100', in gravel
some remaining wood exercise stations
1 multipurpose hard surfaced play area
5) Justiss Elementary School
1 playground with metal play equipment
1 multipurpose hard surfaced play area
6) Givens Elementary School
1 playground
1 multipurpose hard surfaced play area
7) Noyes Stadium- This facility owned by Paris Junior College is leased part-time to
Paris ISO. These limited access facilities include a lighted soccer/football field with
a cinder track oval around the field.
-10-
C. Paris Junior College
Besides the Noyes Stadium facility Paris Junior College offers a wide variety of outdoor
recreation opportunities including:
A one mile walking track
A golf driving range
Six (6) lighted tennis courts
Five (5) unlighted soccer fields
One lighted baseball field
D. Significant Private Recreational Facilities
Paris Golf and Country Club - a 200-acre club about four miles north of the city with an
18-hole golf course, two lighted tennis courts and a pool. Paris Golf and Country Club is
a members and guests facility only. Daily use fee-uses are not allowed.
Pineridge Golf Club - Pineridge is a privately owned public fee golf course. There are no
other recreational amenities.
Gordon Country Club - Gordon Country Club offers a 30-acre private fishing lake,. two
unlighted tennis courts, a swimming pool, and meeting rooms on a 100 acre site. The club
is private for the use of members and their guests.
Dolphin Swim Club - Dolphin Swim Club is a members only medium sized swimming pool.
Optimist Youth Football - a single unlighted playing field for Optimist organized and
sponsored team football.
Optimist Youth Baseball - OYB owns five fields on the extreme east side of Paris, three
of which are lighted. There is one "Pony" league baseball field, one little league, and three
smaller fields for T-ball and "coach" pitch.
Boys Club - The Boy's Club owns two lighted baseball fields (a T-ball and little league
sized fields.)
E. City Owned Park Facilities
A survey was conducted for each park and results individually tabulated on the following
pages.
-11-
j
~
Park:
Bywaters Park
Size:
2.65 Acres
Location:
300 Block South Main SI.
Topography: Flat with some scattered mature trees.
Improvements in the park:
Domino table
19 park benches
Stage (a Corinthian style columned structure)
Fountain
Support facilities:
On street parking on four sides.
Surrounding neighborhood:
To the east is a residential neighborhood and a church. To the west is the library
and more residential neighborhood. To the north is commercial development and
to the south is residential neighborhood.
Park:
Market Square
Size:
1 .70 Acres
Location:
300 Block 1 st Street SW
Topography: Flat
Improvements in the park:
Certified Texas Farmers Market
5,000 s.f. covered area for vendors to sell home-grown produce
Support facilities:
Off-street asphalt paved parking for 100 cars.
Surrounding neighborhood:
To the east are more fruit stands and a cafe. To the west is a domino parlor. To the
north is business development and to the south is residential neighborhood.
-12-
Park:
Chism Park
Size:
0.30 Acres
Location:
900 West Washington St.
. Topography: Flat
Improvements in the park:
Historical monument- memorial tombstone of John Chism
Support facilities:
Gravel circular drive in front of monument
Surrounding neighborhood:
Surrounding the property on east, west and south is open pasture. North of
the property is developed commercial.
Park:
10 th Street Park
Size: 0.15 Acres
Location:
Esplanade in 10th Street between Tudor and Grove
Topography: Flat, some scattered trees
Improvements in the park:
2 picnic tables
2 park benches
basketball court with dirt court
Support facilities:
None-no parking allowed on-street and none provided off-street.
Surrounding neighborhood:
Residential neighborhood on all sides.
-13-
Park:
Martin Luther King Park
i
12th Street NE at Johnson Street
Size:
5.15 Acres
Location:
Topography: Flat with a major drainage ditch bisecting the property
Improvements in the park:
2 picnic tables
2 park benches
20' x 20' playground with 3 pieces of metal play equipment
3 casual backstops
lighted hard surface basketball court
Support facilities:
Street side head-in gravel parking along post and cable barrier (50 cars)
Surrounding neighborhood:
Areas to the north, east and west remain undeveloped pastures and woods.
To the south is residential.
Park:
Walker Park
Size:
18.18 Acres
Location:
18th Street NW and Shiloh
Topography: Rolling- drainage ditch bisecting with scattered mature trees.
Improvements in the park:
8 picnic tables
20' x 20' picnic shelter
2 casual backstops
2 park benches
40' x 40' playground with metal equipment
Support facilities: On street parking on two sides; Dirt parking area for 30 cars
Surrounding neighborhood:
Surrounded on north, south, and east by residential. On west by elementary
school.
-14-
Park:
Wade Park
Size:
8.44 Acres
Location:
25th Street NE at Pine Bluff Street
Topography: Flat with scattered mature trees
Improvements in the park:
29 picnic tables
30' x 50' picnic shelter
2 casual backstops
volleyball standards (grass court)
4 park benches
40' x 80' playground with equipment
water fountain
Support facilities:
Gravel parking for 35 cars
Surrounding neighborhood:
Residential on all sides.
Park:
Record Park
Size: 17.56 Acres
Location:
7th Street NW at Henderson
Topography: Flat with 33% left undeveloped in trees
Improvements in the park:
2 bleacher sections 8 picnic tables
2 park benches 20' x 40' picnic shelter
Lighted softball field 2 lighted basketball courts
Small playground with 4 pcs. of equipment
Support facilities:
Asphalt parking for 40 cars with dirt and gravel parking for 30 more.
Surrounding neighborhood:
Bounded on the east by Texas Dept. of Transportation, on the west by
residential, on the north by apartments and on the south by woods.
-15-
Park:
Culbertson Park
Size:
7.02 Acres
Location:
13th Street SWat E. Washington Street
Topography: Flat with scattered mature trees
Improvements in the park:
5 bleacher sections
3 park benches
6 lighted tennis courts
drinking fountain
50' x 80' playground with equipment
11 picnic tables
30' x 60' picnic shelter
2 lighted softball fields
lighted multipurpose play court
Support facilities:
Two paved parking areas for 25 and 12 cars respectively. A gravel parking
area for 40 cars (poor condition). Ballfield concession building.
Surrounding neighborhood:
All residential
Park:
Ellis Park
Size:
1.0 Acres
Location:
13 th Street SE at Washington
Topography: Flat; wooded
Improvements in the park:
30' x 30' playground with metal equipment
4 picnic tables
2 park benches
volleyball standards (grass/dirt court)
Support facilities: Gravel parking for 25 cars
Surrounding neighborhood:
Bounded on the north by Culbertson Park and residential on the other three
sides.
-16-
Park:
Travis Park
Size:
8.0 Acres
Location:
i
34th Street NW at Graham (Travis Junior High)
Topography: Flat
Improvements in the park:
Unlighted softball field
4 unlighted tennis courts
Support facilities:
Dirt parking for approximately 40 cars
Surrounding neighborhood:
Bounded on the west and north by wooded land; on the south by residential
and on the east by Travis Junior High School
Comment: Land owned by Paris ISO and developed by City of Paris
Park:
Wise Field
Size:
6.49 Acres
Location:
638 SW 4th Street
Topography: flat
Improvements in the park:
2 lighted softball fields
Support facilities:
City park maintenance shop; concession building; gravel parking for
approximately 100 cars; restrooms.
Surrounding neighborhood:
Bounded on the north by woods; elsewhere by residential neighborhoods
-17-
Park:
Plaza Square
Size:
0.5 Acres
i
Location:
Downtown Square
Topography: flat
Improvements in the park:
Culbertson Fountain
Support facilities:
Parking on-street for 80 cars
Surrounding neighborhood:
Central business district
Park:
Oak Park
Size:
7.5 Acres
Location:
2600 Bonham Street
Topography: flat
Improvements in the park: All under construction.
30' x 60' picnic shelter 4 horseshoe pits
24 picnic tables 10 park benches
24 area lights Water fountain
100 ' x 100' playground with 9 pcs of equipment
1/2 mile cinder walking track 6'-0" wide with 3 bridges
24 recently transplanted 15' oak trees
Support facilities:
Handicapped accessible
Spaces for 30 vehicles on west side; 60 vehicles on east side
Wood frame structure to house portable toilet facilities
Surrounding neighborhood:
Residential on the west and south sides; a church occupies the east side and
a small business and residences occupy the north.
-18-
City of Paris
Parks Department Facility Inventory
T T
E E
N N
N N B B B B
P I I A A B A A V
B R L S S L L A S S 0 F
L E A L L C K K L 0
E B S S Y C C F F K E E F L U
A T E H T G 0 0 I I S T T I S E N
C A N E R R U U E E T B B S K Y T
H B C L 0 0 R R L L 0 A A H I B A
E L H T 0 U T T D D P L L I I A I
Area and Location Acres R E E E M N S S S S S L L N N L N
S S S R S D CL~hledl {UnliQhted} CL~hledl r-UnJiahted\ IcasuaD fLiahled'l fUnlighted) G G L s
Bywaters Park, 300 BL. S. Main 2.65 0 1 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Culbertson Park 7.02 5 11 3 1 PIT 1 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
13th and Washington
Record Park 17.56 2 8 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0
7th N W. & Henderson
Wade Park. 25th & Pine Bluff 8.44 0 29 2 1 PIT 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1
Walker Park. 18th N.W. & Shiloh 18.18 0 11 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1
Martin Luther King Park 5.15 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
12th N.E. & Johnson
100h Street Park 0.15 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chism Park 0.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
900 BL. W. Washington
Market Square. 300 BL. 1st SW. 0 0 0 0 PIT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Plaza Downtown 4
Wise Fields. 638 4th SW. 6.49 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Travis School area 3.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
34th NW. & Graham
-
c
.!!2 Q} ~
... E.s
I'lltc:
c.. ro III
'to- a. E;
O~~
~Ul 13
__.:::L m
U ffi u.
a.
u.Q::lZI-<_ZU) 0 0 0 ....
>O.........Iw)-a1..:.......... <> <> - ....
~<I-Wa:: (1):0::--20 - 0 <> -
LL_(J)J:_ZC) - - 0 N
~
~
.~
..
al<cn:r.::Wl-al.<-,-,2 0 0 0 0
~
~
.~
CD<<n::,,:wl-m<....l...ld 0 0 <> '"
~
.
m<Ol!l:lI)l-oQ..(I)! 0 0 0 '"
~
~
.~
..
CD<-'...rLL_W...JO(l)2, 0 0 0 -
~
~
.~
m<...I...Jt.l.._W...IOll)::;!. 0 0 <> <I)
~
.~
..
l-WZZ_tI) OO::l~I-U)2. 0 0 <> <I)
I'
~
l-WZZ_(I) UO:JCt:I-(,I)d 0 0 0 '"
o....J<>OO::O:;)ZO 0 0 - ....
a::W(,I)l-lrQO::EU) 0 0 0 -
-
u)J:W_lI_wcr 0 0 0 ....
mWZUIWU) 0 0 0 ill
'" a;
l-<lD...IWcn - 0 ....
'"
m.....lW<OIwa::cn 0 0 0 -
~!I,l :ll~ 0 ...
~ "'....- -<I) - ~
-
u ri
..:
i c
21! !1! ]j j
C ~~ g .c;
j m~ ..
~ , ~ m
, .. ~
.... '" ~ J ..
1! ~ -!!. '"
u <3 mil! ....
m "-'" ~
~ J " H
'" 0
m m
..: .... .... W_ ....
'"
III
~
'0
Jl!
~
'"
~
o
a.
E
.S!
III
~
'"
i!!
III
.I::
"0
m
",-
Qj
u:
III
'"
~
to
E
o
o
~
en
~
III
E
..
:;
-
III
"
o
_._-_._.~-._---~----_._----,_._-----
Ql
-
m
>
'C
11I0-
.t: "'0
cae
o..m
't- ...; ~
o 5i 0
~E 1j
.- t >
Ol1E
"Ql~
CII013
C (/) '"
._~u..
.c....
em
00-
OC5
o
~
u
rJ)
..,oo_3:<....~ ......a::<_..... - 0 - 0 '"
>O..J..JW>-CXI.o(.J...J ... 0 0 0 ...
?;<~wa:: unc__ze> - 0 0 0 -
Ll.._(I)Z_ZCl '" 0 0 0 '"
~ 0 - 0 0 -
2'
"
m<f/l~W......lD<..J..J2.
i '" 0 0 0 '"
~
m<<n:.:wl-cc<...J....d.
..
~ '" 0 0 0 '"
m<u:,:uu-oQ.oo&
i
L - - 0 '" ...
2'
"
m<...J..Ju.._W....lOl.ll2.
~ "' 0 - "' ;::
.2'
m<.J...Ju.._w...JoUld
~ "' '" 0 '" "'
2' -
"
I-WZZ_(/) UO:lD:::l-(/)2.
I '" 0 '" '" ...
2' -
i-WZZ_(I) OO:llrl-U)d.
.... '" 0 0 0
Q....J<>-oa::O:lZO -
0 0 0 '" '"
ClO-,Ll.. .-oo.:x:O....WUl
::E::l...O-_ ,:Hnw UO::lll:I-Vl ... ... 0 0 '"
0 '" - 0 '"
Q:::lZZ_ZC) 1-D::<O::l(/)
(/)Quowa:: L.l.._W...IOf/l 0 - '" 0 ....
u.oOt-CIlC...J..J u.._W...Jo<n 0 '" 0 - '"
(/)~_::E::E_ZCl a.OO..J(/) 0 0 0 '" '"
~ t
15
Ii <.l
.. .~
-' ."
-g m 0 " lJ)
Q. !!l " -'
m "0 -, " <(
.. I!! ~
~ l; ." ...
m m 0
<( <.l Q. Q. Q. ...
Section 6 - Needs Assessment
I
This section of the masterplan addresses the perceived needs of the community based on:
. public participation and comment
. staff analysis of the inventory
. consulting staff input
. statewide and regional survey responses contained in TORP.
A comparison of the inventory with the "standards" previously discussed shows the
following "deficiencies" when compared to established norms in other places. You are
advised that norms for other places are guidelines for Paris only.
Facility
Recommended
Gold Elmhurst, IL
Paris Inventory
Swimming Pools
Basketball Courts
Tennis Courts
Lighted softball
Unlighted softball
1
49
12
8
1
n/a
16
4
4
o
4
25
11
4
From this review of comparison to known standards then the City of Paris is only deficient
in pools and basketball courts. The trouble with standards is they do not take into account
the age, condition, location and functionability of facilities nor do they allow for local
preferences. (For example both Gold and Elmhurst would say Paris needs an ice skating
rink outdoor if the standards were interpreted literally).
The needs expressed here are not in any particular order. The priorities of the community
will be discussed in a later section.
A. Staff Concerns
Swimming Pool
Most comments received by the park development committee, the city council and the staff
centered around the absence of adequate swimming facilities for competition, exercise
programs, instructional swimming and free swimming. The city does not currently and has
not, in recent history, operated a pool facility. There appears to be much local demand for
programs such as Red Cross' Learn to Swim program, lifesaving and water safety courses,
Boy Scout merit badge courses for lifesaving and swimming, water aerobics, water
"walking", and adult lap swimming. In addition, there is mounting pressure to provide
competitive youth swimming teams with locations to practice. Water ballet is also an up
-19-
and coming sport in Paris. The absence of an indoor pool facility at Paris Junior College
does not help the problelT] of providing safe pool facilities.
Trail Development
The Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan in 1990 pointed out that 47% of the occasions of
participation in all outdoor recreation facilities centered around trail use for hiking, biking,
jogging, roller blading, horse back riding and walking. The city is constructing its first half-
mile track now (Oak Park) and other than this new trail there are no city owned trail facilities
in Paris. The only other trail available for the public is the Paris Junior College. The city
owns several parks of sufficient acreage to allow trail construction. The city also owns
substantial acreage around Lake Gibbons and Lake Crook although these facilities are far
enough out of town as to make development of a trail alone as destination facility (one
where people will drive appreciable distances) an unviable project. Trails connecting one
or more park facilities are to be highly prized.
Camping Facilities
A facility many counties and cities are turning to to promote tourism development is
recreational vehicle camping facilities with beaches, playgrounds, camping spots and
utilities for tents, trailers, or self contained RVs. These facilities can be built together with
boatramps, fishing piers, nature-hike-bike trails around one or both of the lakes. Advantage
can be taken of the existing Canadian goose exhibit and habitat. Typical fees of $10.00
to $20.00 per night can make such facilities a self-supporting project but require
determination and marketing expertise to get the word out about camping facilities.
Park Upgrades
The city staff raised concern about the quality and degradation of certain obsolete park
improvements and the need to build additional support facilities such as paved parking
areas. While picnic facilities may appear in number to be adequate, the city should begin
a replacement program of tables and benches which has outlived therir usefulness. More
group shelters are recommended. There are only four now. Safety surveys may show just
how much work needs to be done.
Trails
With the development of Oak Park (now under construction) the distribution of parks
appears to be adequate with significant park resources generally evenly spaced throughout
the city, at least within Loop 286. As shown on the map of park facilities attached, there
are beginning to be areas of residential development where public parks are one-half mile
away or more. The area east of Loop 286 bounded by F.M. 195 on the north and U.S. 271
South does not have a public park any closer than Wade Park ten full blocks inside the
Loop. Sites should be investigated in this area before too very long. A map is included in
this report where future park sites should be considered within the next ten years.
-2()'
Soccer
Youth soccer is an emerging "big time" sport with teams traveling hundreds of miles (with
many parents) to participate in tournaments virtually all year long. When they travel ,of
course they spend money and many cities such as Longview, Tyler, Terrell, and others
have taken advantage of this market. Park facilities in Paris are not adequate to support
such an effort now but fortunately soccer fields can quickly and inexpensively be
incorporated into other fields for multi-purpose use. The City of Paris should acquire open
lands and develop youth soccer facilities adequate for small tournaments.
Tennis
Lighted tennis courts make bad neighbors make bad neighbors in residential
neighborhoods with houses close in on all sides. For this reason the six courts in
Culbertson Park (plus the now removed basketball court) have proven to be under utilized
and sometimes a gathering place for other than tennis players. Tennis courts are best
grouped into a tennis complex where courts can be looked after by a "pro" or caretaker who
supervises court reservations and activities. Paris would be well served by such a facility.
TENNIS COURTS AT CULBERTSON PARK
-21-
Projected 1995 Percentage of Population Participating3
Aclivitv: % ParticipatinQ:
Soccer 4
Hiking 6
Golf 7
Tennis 7
Saltwater swimming 7
Football 8
Baseball 10
Nature study 10
Basketball 11
Jogging 13
Horseback riding 15
Softball 16
Off-road vehicle riding 20
Freshwater boating 24
Bicycling 24
Hunting 24
Open space activities 24
Camping 25
Playground use 33
Freshwater swimming 36
Freshwater fishing 38
Pool swimming 38
Picnicking 39
Walkinn I r"
31990 TORP - Assessment and Policv Plan, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin,
Texas. Page 5-5.
-22-
r:::
o
.-
-
[(I)
.- c.
:E~
ca r:::
n.o
.-
'+- -
o ca
(I) f
o)u
ca (I)
-0::
r:::
(I)~
U.Q
I-
(I) en
n.ca
"0><
(I) (I)
-I-
ur:::
(1)'-
.....
o
l-
n.
&t)
0)
0)
-
I-
~
c:
o
;
III
.9-
u
:e
III
D..
...
o
III
c:
.2
III
III
U
U
o
U)
en
en
....
III
....
o
I-
-
~
o
o
o
ai
....
-
~
o
o
o
o
~
'tl
Gl
III
..
~
'tl
C
j
-
~
o
o
o
..;
....
-
III
1::
o
Co
III
~
..
E
E
"
'"
"
.;<
s
~
- w
~ a.
0 Q:
0 0
,..: >-
.., ~
-
.~ Ii
~
l- i!
'"
B. Statewide Planning Concerns
The Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan (TORPl of 1990 offers the following information.
". . . walking for pleasure, picnicking and pool swimming are the activities that have
the highest percent of the population participating in them,as is true for the state as
a whole. With the abundance of freshwater lakes in the region, it is not surprising
that the percent participating in freshwater activities (boating, swimming and fishing)
is higher in this reginon compared to most others. The region (Region 5 includes
Bowie, Lamar, Cass, Hopkins, Titus, Red River, Morris, Franklin, and Delta
counties) also has the third highest annual per capita rate of hunting participation
of the twenty-four planning regions with 1.9 occasions, and the highest per capita
rate of horseback riding, 1.1 occasions. Off road vehicle riding is also a popular
activity in the region, as compared with other regions in the state.'"
The table on the previous page depicts the percentages of persons in the Paris region as
defined above who participate in various outdoor activities.
Additionally, the 1990 TORP states:
"Both the cities of Texarkana and Paris own tracts of land with small lakes that,
although used by the public, have not been developed to their potential. Lake Crook
(Paris) and Bringle Lake (Texarkana), with cleanup and minor development, could
become good open space areas."
C. Public Participation
Public participation meetings have shown the following recreation needs most often
expressed by the citizens:
1) No public swimming pools exist or have existed in recent history in Paris. There is
substantial demand for competitive, recreational, and instructional pool uses within
the city.
2) The city owns substantial land and water resources in Lake Crook and Lake
Gibbons which are not being fully utilized.
3) There are no suitable lighted tennis courts. The courts existing are in residential
neighborhoods where the lighting is sometimes offensive, the court surfaces are in
poor shape, and the facilities are not conducive to setting up city leagues or
tournaments.
'1990 TORP - Assessment and Policv Plan, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin,
Texas. Page 5-5.
-23-
4) There are newer parts of town where there are no parks within walking distance.
5) There are no suitable girls softball facilities.
6) Restrooms are lackingand portable toilet facilities are unacceptable.
7) The equipment at Wade Park is aged and obsolete combining older children's
playground equipment with younger and inaccessible by wheelchair.
D. Recommendations
Following evaluation of the public input, City staff compiled the following list of projects in
the priority order in the opinion of the staff and consultant:
1. Municioal Swimmina Center
The City of Paris has not had an operating public pool in modern history and, in fact, there
are no pools available to the general public in the city or reasonably close to it. The
construction of a municipal pool would meet several demands voiced by participants in the
public hearings and committee meeting, namely: childrens' competitive swimming, water
walking-aerobics, lap swimming, instruction swimming and lifesaving, and free swim.
However, swimming alone is not generally economically viable and many modern pools are
furnished with amenities such as group party facilities, picnic tables, concession/vending,
volleyball, sun and shade decks, and large grassy play areas
Estimated Cost (Exclusive of Land) ................................. $425,000
2. Wade Park Imorovements
Wade Park is one of the largest, oldest, and most active parks in Paris and many of the
facilities in the park are obsolete or damaged. Parking is limited to curbside parking on one
side and head-in gravel parking on the opposite side. Many of the facilities are not
handicapped accessible. Sidewalks into the park would improve accessibility for the
handicapped and elderly.The pavilion is a light weight frame with a metal roof. It should
be replaced. Playground equipment is in need of replacement.
Estimated Cost (Equipment, pavilion) ............................... $ 52,500
Estimated Cost (Parking Lot) ...................................... $ 30,000
3. Lake Crook Recreation Area DeveloDment
Lake Crook has never been really developed to its fullest potential. An existing boatramp
is dilapidated and needs replacement but even so is inaccessible because of uneven
ground and erosion. Restrooms in the small picnic area were destroyed years ago and the
old swimming area needs vegetation removal and cleanup. The development could be
-24-
SCALE l' = 100'
~
C/L FENCING
WOOO SUN DECK
SANO VOLLEYBALL
25 YD.X 25 M.
6 - LANE CONC. POOL
GROUP PICNIC SHELTER
BATHHOUSE/
OFFICE
~ ASPHALT PAVING 0
~
~ \)
3 PICNIC TABLES
0 3 COOK STOVES
,
, LEMENT R AD
~ ~~ ~, ~-
.....''- ................ - -.... .... -
Proposed Municipal Pool' City of Paris
I
, .l
___~_ \~.~..__ ,e;:'
--- ~--"''''''''--~ \
__ II ~~
... '-.- I I=--:--a-;,
I I I
-' - :). ,;
. Vi 4
"'r-- 1/....,
"J ----- I ~II .
",_. -/--~---i ~~~
1./ ,-
I 1/ '~\
)
-<
GoI..,____'
ceu '.
-,-'~'
,,..,..'
,...,..~.
~-
''i~
",;of
't,
-",
I
~
.
~ I '.
r'
"
NIi3H.;IiON
I'
\\
\,
\~\\
~
"
,
.
\\
"
.
~ '
~"
""'l~
<
2
.-
- <
=-
.:0:::
--.-
.-1.::-',-"'"
-;t.o
o
~
,
I
.~ -c'
"J" -'---,
~Yj ~"'=,,-<
- ----- "',,\
J
-7 i
:,
,
~'
I,
--7,
'--,t-
~
;4-~~
.~.,~.i:
~'...
. ,:;
.'
,~
<
~
//<:....
I '
, A
~r
, !
~
NO~9
',t-----------
;;.--" '?
3: " //"
-'
.
'"
~
&.
~
,.~
,t)
~
.
~
,ik'!E: I ,<
j. !;f.--, I =" ,-:-.*'
-- -X ----~~,y:.. f"-d' -
--.... l~'''''''~'
, ,:J ,,~}\!' ",.
~' .___ hl/..,__4'''''; '0
/" ---/,..,1- /1.
I" -'!fT..,' ~...
II = ~
~~ . ~ /1 i$t
:'1 __ "!,/"",, ,
I
I
I
I
~Il.
:; '~,\,
,~~o.:'_
\,-1..-.) ._~~ ~-'i ......
.,.:$ '" '" '" "-,,, = '" '-" "- '" ~
I
,
I
---:
.~:/;
oos ____/
/ ::;
/..-:: "-", ,
/ /.;' F'''-- -'",-
/ /< .', ~-y!
,~~:~::500'/ _..-- ~,_,,",,"___
_ _ _ J._.; . ,:'''' --_<I'
- . I
\"'",
~-
~_ I
I~' ~ \ """,_==="'3~'-
--," ~- " ~ '
~-~~-' :!:'
I---
I'
:o=~""~-
I '
\
I
\
, .
\-
.-/l :-:', ,-!.
-I ~ L2.-/ '"":
.~ '\ -
,~, : \
;c~.:-:::-:...>:
ns
~ ~Q)
'I' "'- -
'. \, _ (.):--,
""~~~--."- ."~
'l,~-::-j ;
c
.-l
I
- -
-D
~ ~,U-
........:.:-~--- ,,,-" :.''-'
~ ~--'-C-.L
'j- ~
---(U
.~
=="'~'~i_
\~~'
v' .
r. '/
\;
;----
,
,
""''''-
-"'",
''',
"<..."',>
,
.
~
~.
~l
I
~/
o < ~w:r---
, J
.-#
, ('~,
/:
II
---;-7-
,/
,---'
I
,"'J',--,j
~.,'I
'-- '
\J~
_-..i_
-,,//'.-1~>>'-
--",..y:-#"<'
. .?"
'~/1
"
I "
k-/
c;'-;;-'
;
"
I
L_
-----...:....-....:......
.'-------
'~
.~-/"1
.- -r ~~.-?
, c:;;:-- 7-
':'- .
--- '~~
,-------
~
,,-
,
/
..,'~,
~,
~
"
/
1'-
I ,
i
1
I
!
(.
I,
>
,
,
II
~--
o
?
...~
;/
~.s.-'
. >
>
I
"I
"\~; ,
'\ Ol'
l \.~ I~'-..-',
I'
""'~
"
"
(/ -
"
'I
~'-
>
" --
"
''"'
----....,
~
"'
"
"
:...:"\~
~~
.~
l---
.-
a
"
<
----;::-
'\.I.. """
.~ ~
G{~";~
()8r,
.~' .....=r
e-~. ,.--
,
o
-1
,
-v
\
-)
\
t
..
(~
I ,
~!'
"11>--, g - \, \
1..:00 .::
- ~ c;:( ~~, /,~'
---; ~-.=/ ' E:'
- .,.. : y'
ctS.
C
o
.-
'1
I
----,
'-
"
~
.
"
"
.
'W
'..J
..
o
'"
, _~~'I
fOr
=
../
"
k"
I/~
I:
~:>; ,..-
II
-f
~
~-"""'::E
'-
L.
..~
.-
<;''"'
enhanced through the installation of new picnic areas and group picnic pavilion, paved
. parking, nature and hike and bike trails, restrooms, playground equipment, and recreational
vehicle camping pads with utility hook-ups. However, such improvements will be
meaningless unless the access road is reworked entirely. The old road is covered with
mud and eroded severely. This natural facility has much potential and could be developed
in several phases if necessary. If adequately designed, the camping area could become
an economic boon to the area instead of a liability.
Estimated Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $400,000 - 600,000
4. Uoarade Parks Citywide
Parks throughout the city have play equipment which does not meet current standards for
safety or have been damaged or vandalized. Some of the equipment is over thirty years
old. Shelters are needed in several parks across the city. Tables need to be replaced,
especially those with wooden tops or built out of concrete and stone. Handicapped
accessible tables are needed. Ballfield fences are in need of replacement, having outlived
their useful lives.
Estimated Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $ 40,000
PLAYGROUND AT WADE PARK
-25-
5. SDorts ComDlex
i
Many participants voiced concem over the lack of facilities for children and youth to meet,
exercise and play safely. Tennis courts were recommended by some; softball fields for
girls was also mentioned. A teen recreation center received a lot of support as well. There
are currently no lighted basketball courts in the city. Serious review of these needs and a
search for a suitable site raised the possibility of a single complex housing all these
features on a tract of land near Paris High School. Six lighted tennis courts, two lighted
basketball courts and three girls softball fields (also lighted) are needed to meet present
demand. This project could be developed in phases.
Estimated Cost (Exclusive of Land)
Six lighted tennis courts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $ 160,000
Two lighted basketball courts ................................ $ 35,000
Three softball fields (lighted) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $120,000
Recreation center gym/assembly/weights/aerobics . . .. $400,000 to $2,000,000
6. Pave Parkina Areas
Many of the parks have gravel or dirt parking facilities. New driveways in Paris must be
dust-free and thus paved. Paving the parking areas will bring them into compliance with
current standards, improve drainage, promote usage of the parks, and improve
handicapped and elderly access.
Estimated Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25,000 to 125,000
7. Security Liahtina
All parks should be fumished with minimal security lighting to provide safe usage at night,
and reduce vandalism and crime.
Estimated Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $70,000
8. Restroom Facilities
Presently, there are public restrooms only at one public park. The city currently rents
portable toilets during the summer months for between $6,000 and $8,000 per year.
Pennanent vandal resistant restrooms should be built that meet accessibility standards for
the handicapped. They should be lockable, well lighted and of course well maintained.
Vandal resistant lighting is also a must. Because they are so susceptible to vandalism,
restrooms should be built in high use parks such as Wade, Culbertson, Oak, and Record.
-26-
Generally, these are the parks where reservations are made for large groups and
restrooms could be unlocked. The smaller neighborhood parks do not need these facilities.
Estimated Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $80,000
9. Acauisition
The city as it expands will need to add parks and recreation lands through dedication or
purchase. In particular, areas which should be looked at include east of Loop 286 and west
of 286 near the U.S. Highway 82 corridor. Inside the Loop, we recommend negotiations
with Paris ISD for a possible neighborhood park on the corner of the Crockett Middle
School Campus since this area is not served by a nearby, neighborhood park.
PLAYGROUND AT ELLIS PARK
-27-
Section 8 . Implementation
A. Timetable
The following time schedule is recommended for orderly development or re-development
of parks in Paris:
Item
Year
Priority 1 - Municipal Pool. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995-1996
Priority 2 - Wade Park Equipment ................................. 1995-1996
Priority 2 - Wade Park Parking ....................................... 1996
Priority 3 -Lake Crook Recreational Area (Phase I) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1996
Lake Crook Recreational Area (Phase II) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1997
Lake Crook Recreational Area (Phase III) ....................... 1998
Priority 4 - Upgrade Parks .................................. Budget annually
Priority 5. Sports Complex (Courts and Fields) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1997
Sports Complex (Recreational center building) ................... 2001
Priority 6 -Pave Parking Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1996-1997
Priority 8 -Restroom Facilities .................................... 1996-1999
Priority 9 -Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Ongoing
B. Funding
An ambitous plan of development with several millions of dollars in construction cost alone
not counting land acquisitions dictates some creative and varied fund raising is needed.
Some of the projects can be paid for from budget and capital improvement (bond) funds
or certificates of obligation. The City of Paris has indicated its willingness to apply for
grants-in-aid the most prominent of which are:
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs. Community
Development Block Grants are federal funds distributed from the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development directly to states who in turn distribute through
a complicated regional point system to counties and cities. Wood County or any of
its incorporated areas. Parks developments are eligible. A local match of ten to
twenty percent is usually necessary for the maximum grant of $250,000. The
complication is that, in the intense competition for such funds, usually only ten to
twelve of nearly forty grant applications will be funded in the East Texas Council of
Governments region. Parks are not usually high enough on the regional priority
scale (set by the Regional Review Committees themselves) to score sufficient points
to be competitive.
Texas Parks and Wildlife Texas Recreation & Parks Account Program. This
program has long been used by cities and counties to fund park improvements. In
-28-
fact, several parks in Paris were developed or enhanced with this program. The
program requires 50% local match which can be in the form of donated force
account (applicant's own work forces and equipment), donated labor and/or
equipment, cash, or donated land or combinations of all. Applications are received
by TP & W on January 31 and July 31 of each year and funding is usually
announced 6 to 8 months later. Grant offers follow soon thereafter and allow three
years from grant signature for project completion.
The program was recently amended to add some really attractive features. For
example. Non-park public lands can now be converted to park use and count as
part of the local match in much the same way as donated lands. This includes public
lands owned by independent school districts, junior colleges and other public
entities. An old landfill or sewage plant, if the land is acceptable for park use, can
be converted and the city gets matching funds up to its appraised value.
Texas Parks and Wildlife Boatramp Fund
Texas Parks and Wildlife has funds available for boatramps under a separate
application procedure.
TENNIS COURTS AT CULBERTSON PARK
-29-
Conclusion
i
Based on public participation hearings, invitations to solicit comments, staff and consultant
input, the City of Paris should proceed with development and refurbishment of the parks
and recreation facilities in Paris. The argument will surely be made that parks and
recreation facilities like tennis courts and swimming pools cost money to build and operate
and are surely "money losers". The public should keep in mind, however, that streets and
sidewalks are not money-makers either to any extent. For that matter, police and fire
departments are not self supporting. There are simply some things in city government that
the public demands acknowledging the fact that there will be little or no revenues to off-set
expenses of providing those facilities.
The adoption and implementation of this plan will meet the goals and objectives set out in
Section 4 of this plan.
-30-
Appendices.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Public Participation Notices
Public Responses to Solicitation
Survey of Eight Municipal Pool Facilities
Public Participation Notices
Proof of Publication
STATE OF TEXAS } Before me, the
undersigned
COUNTY OF LAMAR . authority, on this
day personally appeared Debra Voorhies known to
me, who being by me duly sworn on her oath
deposes and says that she is the Classified
Advertising Manager of the Paris News, a
newspaper published in Paris, Lamar County,
Texas and that a copy of the within citation was
published in said newspaper THE PARIS NEWS,
such publication being on the following dates:
NonCE OF PUBUC HEAAIN~
TO All INTERESTED PERSONS
.AND THE PUBUC IN GENERAL
1/ r ~ L, '1
(, '~L :.LI.
)1":) h.cc
J "
YOU ME HEREBY NQTIFIf:.D mat
the City or Paris will hQld il puOlic
hearing at 6 p.rn.. on Monday.
January 9, 1995. In lt1e City (oun.
~i~t Cs~~e~~e~~ri;.itfe~:~\~ ;:c;;:~
input from citizens concerning a
Texas Parks 0. WI'(llife Gri!nt Ap-
plication for Dudding a muninpal
swimming pool
Mattie Cunningham
City ClerK
January 8, 1995
and a newspaper copy of this is hereto attached.
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF LAMAR
Debra Voorhies
}
Before me, Onvie Hayes, a notary public, on this
day personally appeared Debra Voorhies, know to
me to be the person whose name is subscribed to
the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me
that she executed the same for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed.
Gi.ven u~ct7! my han9 and seal of office .____
thiS 10 - dayoL/(L~,A.D.L'Y'?o;.
i",
C,,
L,
/}!
(-2-& ~oizz~:c.a/
Onvie Hayel
Total Publication Cost: $ 12.75
THE PARIS NEWS. Posl OHice 80x 1078
Paris. Texas 75461
Proof of Publication
STATE OF TEXAS }Befor~ me, the
undersigned
COUNTY OF LAMAR authority, on this
day personally appeared Debra Voorhies kr
me, who being by me duly sworn on hi
deposes and says that she is the CI.
Advertising Manager of the Paris Ne
newspaper published in Paris, Lamar
Texas and that a copy of the within citati
published in said newspaper THE PARIS
such publication being on the following date
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF LAMAR
Debra Voorhie~
}
January 5, 1995
and a newspaper copy of this is hereto attac
CllL11l Lrf\_hJ;J
Before me, Onvie Hayes, a notary public, on this
day personally appeared Debra Voorhies, know to
me to be the person whose name is subscribed to
the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me
that she executed the same for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed.
Given under my hand and seal of office
'( [l... - i ';;'C / -
this '- day of V-:U-.~ ,A.D. f....i.L>
, ,
,~'
(~.' , / ) /
}-;J)A/U.j jofCU!-t-Y
Onvie Hayes"
Total Publication Cost: $
THE PARIS NEWS. Post onic. Box 1078
Paris. Texas 75461
Proof of Publication
STATE OF TEXAS } Before me, the
undersigned
COUNTY OF LAMAR authority, on this
day personally appeared Debra Voorhies known to
me, who being by me duly sworn on her oath
deposes and says that she is the Classified
Advertising Manager of the Paris News, a
newspaper published in Paris, Lamar County,
Texas and that a copy of the within citation was
published in said newspaper THE PARIS NEWS,
such publication being on the following dates:
January 15, 1995
and a newspaper copy of this is hereto attached.
II,:' '1 L.', ';r ( I. j" ,,^
I)'} i I ) ,'" ~. ~ "__..
,',.'~'.' ",'-- -" --' -,/ -
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF LAMAR
Debra Voorhies
}
Before me, Onvie Hayes, a notary public, on this
day personally appeared Debra Voorhies, know to
me to be the person whose name is subscribed to
the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me
that she executed the same for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed.
Given under my hancland seal of office ___'
h. /'tl'd f!'~ .AD/?'?'
t IS .j - ay 0 \ cL..- , .. .....
"
',.-.
/ /Yl ;'7.' ,
/ /..........l/ ,-"4:.../
Onvie Hayes
Total Publication Cost: $
Tuesdav.Jan.17
CITY SEEKS INPUT ON PARKS
A public hearing for a parks master plan will be 6
p.m. Tuesday, Jan. 17, at Justiss Elementary School
cafeteria.
THE PARIS NEWS. Post Office 80x 1078
Paris, Texas 75461
Prvbf of Public-1tion
STATE OF TEXAS } Before me, the
undersigned
COUNTY OF LAMAR authority, on this
day personally appeared Debra Voorhies known to
me, who being by me duly sworn on her oath
deposes and says that she is the Classified
Advertising Manager of the Paris News, a
newspaper published in Paris, Lamar County,
Texas and that a copy of the within citation was
published in said newspaper THE PARIS NEWS,
such publication being on the following dates:
W~.Jan.18
CTIY SEEKS INPUT ON PARKS
A public hearing for a parks master plan will be 6
p.m. Wednesday, Jan. 18, in the west side exhibit
building on the fair grounds.
January 15, 1995
and a newspaper copy of this is hereto attached.
f' I " '
'" '-0; I (',f',l !l
, ,,' L',' j 1<; .' ! /"-/
, " _'-_' -.....7'-. '_' '~ - '--_
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF LAMAR
Debra Voorhies
}
Before me, Onvie Hayes, a notary public, on this
day personally appeared Debra Voorhies, know to
me to be the person whose name is subscribed to
the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me
that she executed the same for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed.
Given under my hand..J!nd seal of office '
this If t:f- day of \.-)rc<--,-, ,A.D. /7 '1~
/ ,-.
v'
();; !-(~ /" ),t-Cl~ V
Onvie Hayes J
Total Publication Cost: $
THE PARIS NEWS. Post Office Box 1078
Paris, Texas 75461
LoCA'-\.. '1: 4=iO<;.",."-lo,,,5
\
i
Please announce periodically through January 18, 1995.
A series of public hearings will be held by the City of Paris
Parks Department to receive citizen input as to what new parks and
recreation facilities they would like to see in Paris. This
information will be the basis for a new Parks Master Plan.
Individuals may request anything they desire concerning park
activities and facilities. Such as recreation center, pool,
athletic fields, improvements to Lake Crook and Lake Gibbons and
any other park activities they might be interested in should be
discussed.
Citizens may attend any of the following public hearings:
January 12, 6 P.M. Aikin Elementary School Cafeteria
January 17, 6 P.M. Justice Elementary School Cafeteria
January 18, 6 P.M. Lamar County Fairgrounds West Exhibit
Building
Citizens input is a must in preparing a Parks Master Plan.
The general public along with service club representatives, youth
sports association and senior citizen representatives are invited
to attend one of these very important meetings.
Public Responses ~o Solicitation
1P0\t2~~ ~oooo~~ 0\~~~~0\11I@OO
{P..@.. [oo)l:l~OO
(PtA\IE~D 'lJ"I:.l ~
\?'LJUl)lm!:: 'tl~ ~ 'tl~'tl4J.&)
After learning the basics of tennis, most players, young and old,
become interested in organized play to improve their skills or just to
have fun. More kids have tried out for the Tennis Teams in our
schools the past 2 years than ever before. Many players enjoy league
and tournament play. The PTA strives to provide all this and more
for the people of Paris by offering beginner clinics throughout the
year for juniors and adults; by having weekly league play year
around; and by hosting 3 tournaments per year. ALL OF THIS IS
DONE BY VOLUNTEERS.
We strongly feel that the future of the courts at Culbertson Park
is in jeopardy. The court surfaces are in a needy state of repair.
Even the 3 courts that were resurfaced by the city a little over 4
years ago are chipping and cracking. This is partly due to water that
stands after a rain, however some of it is due to the ever increasing
vandalism that we are experiencing at the park. The tennis courts are
being abused by kids on roller skates, roller blades, bicycles, and
skateboards. They play hockey, baseball, football, and they sit
straddled on the nets swinging each other until the net collapses.
These unauthorized sports and games have really taken their toll on
the court surfaces and net posts. The increase of loiterers around the
courts has resulted in harassment and aggression toward the players.
Some people won't even play at night anymore and certainly don't
drop their children off unattended.
The Paris Tennis Association asks that the City of Paris build
courts away from any residential areas. We feel a great location
would be in the middle of the walking track at Dragon Park between
24th SE and Collegiate St. This would be ideal for tournaments
hosted by our city schools and would increase the safety factor for
people who enjoy the walking track. Tennis is a gentlemen's sport
not associated with yelling and screaming and poses no threat to the
tranquility of the walking track.
(p~~U~ "OOOOU~ ~~~~u~n@)oo
!Po@.. (00)13 ~oo
!P~~D 1113 ~
~ ?l~ @XR ?l~~..4J.?l4}ID
Should the City Council decide that constructing new tennis courts
can not be accomplished in the near future, we plead to you that the
courts at Culbertson Park be resurfaced properly and that strict
measures be taken and enforced to halt the improper use of the
courts, harassment of players, and vandalism.
On behalf of the Paris Tennis Association, people who enjoy the
game of tennis, and all future tennis players, we thank you for your
past help and for your concern in keeping tennis a safe and active
sport in this area. The following pages document the PTA's
activities, accomplishments, and future plans for tennis in Paris.
Respectively yours,
Paris Tennis Association Executive Committee:
~s~~ walk.er, President
~~~~
Rick Wa}ker, Vice President
'1('1<: b t1/i-,i!-
Philip Clark, League Director & UST A Referee
. ""')' (ee,'-
MEMO
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Mr. Dick Boots
Dr. Jean Bailey Campbell
City of Paris Swimming Pool
January 18, 1995
~.,~V~
I'
,
I have been involved in aquatics for nearly sixty years! First as a child swimmer and diver in
municipal pools, as an aquatic water front director of summer camps, as a synchronized swimmer
in college, as an owner of a back yard pool for 35 years, aa a professor at Bowling Green State
University of Ohio serving as the Synchronized Swim Coach and the Women's Intercollegiate
Swimming and Diving Coach, as the director of more than 30 annual water shows, as an
American Red Cross Water Safety Instructor Trainer and Lifeguard Instructor Trainer for over 20
years, first in Chicago, then in Ohio and for the past 13 years in Paris, Texas
Since there is no municipal pool in our area, all the lifeguard and swimming instructor classes
that are taught are, by necessity, taught at local motels, private clubs, country clubs or private
back yard pools. Many of these are inadequate for part of the training and it is sometimes
necessary for the class to travel to a church camp about 20 miles outside of town.
Many youngsters and adults have no place to swim at all. Only the affiuent in our town who can
afford to join a private club or own, or have friends who own, a back yard pool ever have a place
to swim. Some are able to take swimming lessons through the YWCA, Areofit Health Club and
private swim clubs, but them have no place to practice what they learn in the lessons. Many are
unable to do so because oflack of funds or because the lessons are completely filled early in the
season.
Swimming is one of the most beneficial life-long exercises; water walking, exercises in water and
water aerobics are valued activities for senior citizens and arthritic and cardiac rehab patients; and
Physical Therapy in water often hastens recovery of patients. The majority of our citizens are
deprived of the benefit of these activities because there is no pool available to them
A well-run municipal pool that offers high quality swimming lessons, recreational swims, water
aerobic, water walking, water rehabilitation classes, scuba instruction, competitive swimming and
diving, synchronized swimming opportunities, high quality life guard instructional classes would
greatly improve the quality ofJife in Paris and Lamar County.
Be assured that I will help facilitate the construction of a city pool and work to help develop
instructional and recreational activities in the pool.
January 16, 1995
Sl,bject: The Need for a Public Swimming Pool
From: Joan Mathis
When my now twenty-eight year-old son was only eight years old, I drove him and several
of his friends to a pool for an evening of swimming. Prior to loading the boys onto my
tlUck, I had called the manager to make sure that these young black boys would be
permitted to swim. He assured me that there would be no problem. With towels around
their shoulders, wearing swimming tlUnks, and the happiest of countenances on their
faces, they piled out of the tlUck, racing toward the swimming pool.
The gate keeper told them, "I'm sorry, you can't swim herel" I pushed through the cluster
of boys to the gatekeeper to assert that I had talked to the manager who had okayed their
swimming in the pool. "But he's not here," replied the gatekeeper.
The boys' laughter turned to sheer silence. Of the ride home, I don't remember any
conversation--just the silence.
n~l'ugh many racial barriers have been dissolved, a public swimming pool is still non-
n;stenl. Perhaps this emotional response to this indelible memory overrides any logical
I ~ason for the construction of a public swimming pool which would surely be financially
demanding for the City of Paris. Bearing this in mind, it may prove prudent to consider
the possibility of purchasing or leasing an existing large pool.
The demands of operating and monitoring a public pool would certainly be imposing;
however, it is not a project Paris is incapable of And I strongly feel that such a sacrifice
would benefit the youth of our city who have no access to a facility of this kind.
A concerned citizen,
QK4-- ~
~an Mathis
Public Responses to Solicitation
. i
LJh~ u)<2 ne8d 0-,- ~l
Lv~~ LL'(: (IE'-t:C1 Ck t;c! ( (_J::)
l)f(K'~ {(en (YI~~1 L'LLl (<;t' cf-(cuJJk
CuYlt~IIE:,.L.~ . O(U) /X1 cC (L;)
L l>h {; ) /-)(: Cf) /( ~' Y-c -1-/1 ~
I&::L _ +h&~'E (Ie.!) be o/trcRru'(/
~l(X{P._ c:.:{1n)E-6cd~ /77/gltt.. _ .
(it<'). ~\(\ '+ It., C!&t-jJ. jYJ"r:y QI cl
ytj . / . I (' [ I LJ /
lneH. <crh'!Ji.>\.,' (rYJ / t Oo..n
Lx:-' (,-!f.1170)JtYicJ, Jc k)Dk Q{l)€/\.
.
AlY)J-:\ ~-hr--Q-:cn
\ '\-t'\
lD <Ared {>
C(cc\<cctt _ Vl~c~k
- (1oJtx; c
" ~.
"- \
\- '. \
'- ,
p
J
" 'll
,I .
1__.. -._. _--'-_..___._._
,lJby
("1.- ,',\
't'.Vl......\l
We
( "
...j , ,'-'....1 '; ~_~\
\~i J.. " C.
,
~\.
~ ..)..d'\ \"'\ .1-\ I \\ ,,~j
~I
I. 1\,,/--1'.._
u.....; l"-~ \__
\, :,)\~
, . \"
'..,(\~".
~i....\.'. ,
i . . ,~_
I ;',-',v,,--
~,
"'~ . '0-
" \
,-1 i..::,-',.......,. _~
c~_, \/::.:'
v\.
".~. '0''0,/
..:"r-., ......\
t01 \0: S .leC;. ~, \-~"C
.hQ..l\ :""\";'!
GD\\O\, -\0'\
W.:::.
It:
h
\'\
,-
.... ., ,..i t.,.. \.::..
,
,
\ "I ,.' i
li ,\..,., \J-'-"~
, ,
Co'\\
Y (\'''''i
~\..
-
.~
';~,I,-,,- '
\
. t .;.,"
., l ; \ t.:,-
., ' "\\~
',_\" \d ,
,. ,
,.. . \ \ ~
~, \ \_:...... h....J..
\x:..:. ~~,,(;2..
lL\',,;
I';' -1
. -'
, I \ c_
'--./ -"-"'
,\ " c',
'---'. \ \
'-, SLA...J \ \'. \ \'I') <\\....j \ ,.:.:;\
..J '.
Ct\ ", Gt.- '""', \l\~ '\ :.../I.C\ /
-.:
~oo\
),
',-,,). ,/~
........'. -
1... I......\~_....\\\\, ;..J.. ~;....JJ'\''':'\\(Y-\\{\.3
\;,2-,;\ \"'\j\ \ C\.-\." C\~\ ..::.1 ("':).
. \ .-"\ J II.
'\'~"..J\ '. ..l-,'\. ......\\-\~ .......\-.,1\', \\\
,
..",....
\~'\
.
\' \' \ \' -I
. _J
',' . ~ .",1
\ \ '..I \ ~ 'j
h)e . - ,'> D '....;.J\\\\ '" ,\ \\:)
iK~l..,-(k\ .:JW\\,\\\\\e \\{\ -\\\c...
fCC\' ~\c\,.::. t-=~?\C \...U\5\r,
\" (' '. ',.", ' ..).. \
" I \. J~ yC:"'" \ \'\ \.. ',-
.:.A, -(" \ c.\ f (.\\\6. \ ~ \.J.J () ,\\.::-
0\ \ wtS, Yec::\'\::;.
,~W 0..,\"Q.'Y":\.. _au.1 .C t \"
,\\D '0-ow -\ D
-,
". ". \ -\
\ ....\~F2
,~
_\ ~,
'\ I"
..i,\
\ .. '>
V v'-
...\.) t~
:;: ,...I..) \ 'f\ ~\\ \'\3
\)-C:-
i \..". ,\ ,-t,
'- ,-,\...1" LX
\- .~
\-' ';
,( \/
\ '-"-
,- \....
- ,
\' ,
. " ",
''C t:
'." -\-\
~. Y'-
'Cje\ ,\0 ,~O
\. ,,\, \, \., _\ .' "~I' ~\
.lev \..,~t:. \..1'0.....;..... V"-- .
1\ .- \
;)1....0\\'\ \...,\\\\U, 'on-=:: :,('\;].
J
(..<CI
-'cr
. ,.
'-
')
.._-Uqy LLQ ne.E:.d CL r=ca l
- ~ - ,
.'. LJhu we ne(2d Q pn l
Qo l~~g COn g(0-L4 fu-{ oe
~koLJ~d p~~7e ~
if; -B-e p:p ~ +f\QJQ (' CUrl b2.
. I rd 0 lr(t8e !JJrnefod~ m7j)~J .--l
. [1P Ln I WlQ geep 0 (X"Lr+ ~ uru.
. ~ eN mn Y- Q{,J uYJ ,+ QU:1 be 9o!'l:lebro;
+D .(OC) /1. OPfcr +Aek '__n .
\\)~'\ .~ e.- ~Qe6 )" 2;"..\ { J.
Ii 'h l..<.. (J \U,=, 0 IAv \ 0 \ \ , '.1'. Ie \ .<2, .\ .].. ':
j\'c..\l ~ V G\J(.-~ ''J00\/ ~0"~~1 ~:, '.'J -:: _
,:../ .,1\\ I':)~\. W\\I:~'~..'l\\e..\J"'; ~ . \, .
\ Pod ' .
'''....' ,.11-" ",\." ,
~':.,- '0\1'.. ". '1', .,. 'r"~ ') ~,v 't v ~.' '_ ' ' !;
\X) l',/,:) \~
.
;
.' " '. '. :-. ,'i'i '.
"\.
-
,
. _, .1.\\":' ").. _
\ lh..., \',
~', t ') \'. ",",,- ';;'::'
, . .., .. " VI...
." . I '-.."
--v' ! ." '_'
... \ \.\
Y' -,;>, " . I \
- ..'- ~ ......
j , . ~ "
\ ". , ',,, . ,-,..,\
'f' . \ ,1 -r'- ". ,........-.\.\. I'. '>'." i" \
~v.J......._ .- v...c\'\.......
,
,~._,
'1 /~ CITY OF PARIS
~--
MEMORANDUM
TO:
ERIC CLIFFORD, POOL COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN
FROM:
DICK BOOTS
DATE:
NOVEMBER 28, 1994
As requested, I have surveyed eight municipalities concerning
pool operations. Five of these are in the same population range as
the City of Paris. The other two are smaller towns in this area
that operate a municipal pool. Each of these Cities has a survey
sheet attached to this memo concerning their swimming pool
operation at their respective city.
You also requested a meeting of the Swimming Pool Committee.
This has been scheduled for 4:00 P.M., December 6, in the City Hall
Council Chambers. I have sent a copy of the survey to each
committee member for their review prior to the December 6th
meeting.
Respectfully,
,-;---... .~-~ ""'
b1~Z. '- ~--;;;:",
Dick Boots
Director of Community Facilities
cc: Millie McDonald
John Bell
Jim Chadwick
Jean Campbell
Aaron Jenkins
Michael E. Malone
T.K. Haynes
Tommy Haynes
po. BOX 9037 . PARIS. TEXAS 7546' .9037 1903l 785.751' . FAX 19031 785.8519
SURVEY OF SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS
CITY: BROWNWOOD
CONTACT PERSON : DAVID WITHERS
POPULATION: 20,000
PHONE: 915) 646-0146
SIZE OF POOL: 75' X 150'
DIVING AREA: YES
HOURS OF OPERATION: 1:00 - 6:00 P.M.
AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE: 225 / 76 DAYS
ADMISSION FEE: $1.00 KIDS; $1.25 ADULTS
SWIM CLASSES: YES
POOL RENTAL FOR PARTIES: NO
SIZE OF STAFF: 5 GUARDS 1 POOL MANAGER; 2 CONCESSION OPERATORS
CONCESSION OPERATION:
STAND OPERATION
CONSTRUCTION COST: OLD pooL! UNKNOWN
ANNUAL OPERATING COST: CHEMICALS - $18,000.00; STAFF $13,000.00; MAUlT. $3,500.
ANNUAL REVE~S: CONCESSIONS $7,000.00; ADMISSIONS $18,000 = $25,000.00
ANNUAL PROFIT/LOSS: LOSS - $9,500.00
SURVEY OF SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS
CITY: CEDAR HILL
CONTACT PERSON: STEVE MEADOORS
POPULATION: 21,000
PHONE: 214) 291-5130
SIZE OF POOL:
L-SHAPED, 42' X 75' & 35' X 41'
DIVING AREA:
YES
HOURS OF OPERATION: 1:00 - 7:00 P.M.
AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE:
350 - 80 DAYS
ADMISSION FEE: $1.00
SWIM CLASSES: YES
POOL RENTAL FOR PARTIES: YES
SIZE OF STAFF: MANAGER - I, GUARDS - 6
CONCESSION OPERATION: MACHINES
CONSTRUCTION COST: UNIGIOWN
ANNUAL OPERATING COST: $42,000.00
ANNUAL REVENUES: ADMISSIONS $28,000.00 , CONCESSIONS - $4,000.00
ANNUAL PROFIT/LOSS: LOSS - $10,000
SURVEY OF SWLMMING POOL OPERATIONS
CITY:
DENISON
POPULATION: 23.000
CONTACT PERSON: SHARON LAFITTE
PHONE: 903) 463-5116
SIZE OF POOL:
L-SHAPED, 25 METERS
DIVING AREA: NO
HOURS OF OPERATION: 1: 00 - 7: 00 P.M.
AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE: 300 / 72 DAYS
ADMISSION FEE: $1.00 KIDS, $1.25 - ADULTS
SWIM CLASSES: YES
POOL RENTAL FOR PARTIES: NO
SIZE OF STAFF: 8 GUARDS, 2 MANAGERS
CONCESSION OPERATION: MACHINES
CONSTRUCTION COST: UNKNOWN - 30 YEARS OLD
ANNUAL OPERATING COST: ($64,500.00) UTIL.= $12,625.00; CHEM.=$14,OOO.00
SALARIES= $34,000.00; MAINT.= $4,000.00
ANNUAL REVENUES: $37,600.00
ANNUAL PROFIT/LOSS: LOSS - $26,900.00
SURVEY OF SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS
CITY:
DESOTO
POPULATION: 33,000
CONTACT PERSON: BARBARA SCOTT
PHONE: 214/ 230-9650
SIZE OF POOL:
50 METERS
DIVING AREA:
NO - REMOVED
HOURS OF OPERATION: NOON- 7:00 P.M.
AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE: 250 - 75 DAYS
ADMISSION FEE: $1.00
SWIM CLASSES: YES
POOL RENTAL FOR PARTIES: YES
SIZE OF STAFF: MANAGERS -2, GUARDS -7, CHSHIER -1
CONCESSION OPERATION: MACHINES
CONSTRUCTION COST: UNKNOWN - BUILT AROUND 1965
ANNUAL OPERATING COST: $80,000.00
ANNUAL REVENUES: ADMISSIONS - $20,000, RENTAL - $2,500.00, LESSONS &
CONCESSIONS - $22,250.00
ANNUAL PROFIT/LOSS: LOSS - $35,000.00
SURVEY OF SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS
CITY: GREENVILLE
CONTACT PERSON: JOHN COBB
POPULATION: 25 .000
PHONE: 903) 457-3106
SIZE OF POOL:
60' X 100' WITH 130' WATERSLIDE
DIVING AREA: NO
HOURS OF OPERATION:
12:00 NOON - 6:00 P.M.
AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE: 202 - 86 DAY SEASON
ADMISSION FEE: $2.00
SWIM CLASSES: YES
POOL RENTAL FOR PARTIES: NO
SIZE OF STAFF:
8 GUARDS, 1 CASHIER, 2 SLIDE OPERATORS
CONCESSION OPERATION:
MACHINES
CONSTRUCTION COST: $600,000.00
ANNUAL OPERATING COST: $61,000.00
ANNUAL REVENUES: ADMISSIONS - $36,000.00
ANNUAL PROFIT/LOSS: LOSS - $25,000.00
,
SURVEY OF SWIMMING POOL 'OPERATIONS
CITY: MT. PLEASANT
CONTACT PERSON: MIKE HALL
POPULATION: 12,000
PHONE: 903) 572-3412
SIZE OF POOL: 60' X 100'
DIVING AREA: YES
HOURS OF OPERATION:
AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE: 125 - 72 DAYS
ADMISSION FEE:
$2.00
SWIM CLASSES: YES
POOL RENTAL FOR PARTIES: NO
SIZE OF STAFF: MANAGER - I, GUARDS - 4
CONCESSION OPERATION: OPEN CONCESSION BY GUARDS
CONSTRUCTION COST: UNKNOWN - BUILT IN 1951
ANNUAL OPERATING COST: $22,610.00
ANNUAL REVENUES: $17,000.00
ANNUAL PROFIT fLOSS: LOSS - $5,600.00
SURVEY OF SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS
CITY: MI. VERNON
CONTACT PERSON: JANES. STINSON
POPULATION:
PHONE: 903) 537-2252
SIZE OF POOL: 35' X 45'
DIVING AREA: YES
HOURS OF OPERATION:
1 - 6 P.M.
AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE: 68 - 75 DAYS
ADMISSION FEE: $1.50
SWIM CLASSES: YES
POOL RENTAL FOR PARTIES: NO
SIZE OF STAFF: GUARDS - 5
CONCESSION OPERATION: MACHINES
CONSTRUCTION COST: UNKNOWN - BUUT WITH PRIVATE FUNDS
ANNUAL OPERATING COST: $10,000.00
ANNUAL REVENUES: $6,800.00
ANNUAL PROFIT/LOSS: LOSS - $3,200.00
,-,--
RESOLUTION NO. 98-162
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Masterplan for the City of Paris, dated January,
1995, adopted by the City Council of the City of Paris on January 26, 1995, requires amendment
due to changing circumstances; and,
WHEREAS, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department requires that the City of Paris's
Parks and Recreation Master Plan be updated to retlect the current facility inventory and to re-
prioritize the recommended projects in order for the City of Paris to be eligible for future grant
proposals; and,
WHEREAS, it is deemed appropriate that the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Changes
and Additions as depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto, should be approved; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, that the
Parks and Recreation Masterplan for the City of Paris be, and the same is hereby, amended
to reflect the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Changes and Adpitions depicted on Exhibit A,
~~~~. .
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of November, 1998
W'
Charles H. Neeley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Mattie Cunningham, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
G~/?
-sCott P. Foster, City Attorney
Serving Paris and Lamar County
January 5, 1995
Mr. Dick Boots
City of Paris Parks & Recreation
P.O. Box 9037
Paris, TX 75460
Dear Mr. Boots:
At the Chamber of Commerce we are continuously contacted
about the availability and type of public recreational
facilities in Paris. Although the facilities in Paris are
excellent and well maintained, we certainly believe that
there is a need to provide additional recreational
opportunities to our citizenry.
The Lamar County Chamber of Commerce wholeheartedly
supports the concept of a master plan for Paris' Parks and
Recreation Facilities. Through a long term plan and
commitment, we think the recreational desires of our
community for both indoor and outdoor public facilities could
be better served.
please let us know how the Chamber may work with the
City to accommodate the recreational needs of our community.
Sincerely yours,
~7~~~~Y--
. Gar;) Vest
Executive Vice President/CEO
GV/kb
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF LAMAR COUNTY
1651 CLARKSVILLE ST. . PARIS. TeXAS 75460
~llrywCA
of Paris and Lamar County
308 South Main
.
Paris, Texas 75460
.
(903) 785-5221
January 6,1995
Dick Boots
Community Facilities Director
City Hall
Paris, Texas 75460
Dear Mr. Boots,
The YWCA uses Culbertson Park extensively to provide its girls'Little Dixie
Softball program during the spring and surnmer. The facilities at Wise Park
are also used.
Approximately 250 girls between the ages of 7 and 15 play on the fields each
summer. During the time that the girls are playing, parents and siblings also
enjoy the facilities at the park. In an age when children spend too much time
on their own, the sports program we offer in partnership with the city
(through the use of Culbertson Park) provides wholesome activity and quality
family time for the girls.
Improving facilities in any way contributes to the safety and well-being of the
girls in our program, as well as providing a more aesthetically pleasing
environment. A Master Plan which would guide the upgrade of park facilities
would be welcorned and appreciated by the YWCA.
Sincerely,
cp~1P{~
Priscilla Merriman
Executive Director
Member Agency Lamar County United Way
Paris
Junior
college i
(~
S,'\iC::: :~2-l
2..1-00 C1arksv;lle Street
PariS TX 75..1-60-6298
(903) 7"85-7661
FAX (903) 784.9370
,\- E; ,,.I ~ix.-.r:,."'1'i ~,;I.:ut;,Jq
January 6, 1995
Mr. Dick Boots
Director of community Facilities
city of Paris
150 S.E. 1st
Paris, TX 75460
Dear Dick:
We at Paris Junior college pledge our utmost
support to the city of Paris' Long Range Master
Plan. The continual growth of Paris and Lamar
County will need the visionary approach the City of
Paris is taking.
Outdoor recreation is a critical need for our
community for the well being of our citizens and
for the attraction of future industries.
If Paris Junior college can be of any assistance in
the attainment of these goals, please do not
hesitate in calling on us.
Sincerely,
Ai? d~-
Bobby R. Walters
President
BRW/sw
,~
January 7, 1995
Paris Parks Department
Dick Boots
P.O. Box 9037
Paris, Texas 75460
Dear Mr. Boots
The Lake Crook Fisherman's Association (LCFA) has strived over
the past several years to up grade the Lake Crook area. We have
rebuilt the fishing pier to where it is safe and enjoyable for all
involved. We understand that a Masterplan is being prepared by the
Parks Department. The LCFA totally supports the effort to develop
a Masterplan. Hopefully, additional improvements can be made that
will enable the residents of Paris to fish, picnic and play once
again at this beautiful public recreation area. We encourage you
to solicit funding and apply for grants to make the improvements
that are necessary.
Sincerely,
--' /- - ') /
;;, _4".-n~/p-/./tf~c~
!:-;:' / '
Lyndol Redus
Lake Crook Fisherman's Association
January 8, 1995
City of Paris Parks Department
Dick Boots
P.O. Box 9037
Paris, Texas 75460
Dear Dick,
On behalf of the Paris Softball Association and it's forty
teams, I want to thank you for your support of our organization.
Outdoor recreation is a very important part of our lives. The PSA
fully supports your efforts in developing a Parks and Recreation
Masterplan and in submitting an application for funding assistance
for the City of Paris. Hopefully, through development and future
planning, we can all benefit from more recreation and athletic
faci1i ties. Thanks for your help over the years. The Paris
Softball Association will help in whatever way we can to see that
our facilities are upgraded for the benefit of our Users.
Respectfully,
rd >>~
Mike Goss
President Paris Softball Association
~
~
ROTARY CLUB OF PARIS, TEXAS
P. O. Box 762, Paris, Texas 75460
CLUB NQ. 194
DISTRICT 583
ORGANIZED NOV. 9. 1915
CHARTEREDJAN.1.1916
January 8, 1995
Mr. Dick Boots
City of Paris Parks Deparment
POBox 9037
Paris, Texas 75460
Dear Mr. Boots,
The Rotary Club of Paris is most supportive of your efforts to develop a Master Plan
and application for funding for the City of Paris Parks Department. Recreation and
park activities are a vital part of our community. Renovating older facilities and
constructing new park facilities is of utmost importance to the well-oeing of our Paris.
We appreciate what you are doing, and ask that you let us know if there is any way
we can assist you in this activity.
Yours truly,
{\ 'm /~ -
-J <"v l- c~.d.(
. ,
Don McCaskill
President
S('r~ln A btH'f Sell He P,nflls Most Who StflJes Best
Breakfast Optimist Club of Paris, Texas
(@
t/9'tLE.nd 0{ ~outh."
P.O. Box 1011
Paris, Texas 75461-1011
CHARTERED 1957
1-12-95
Dick Boots
Director of Community Services
City of Paris
P. O. Box 9037
Paris, Texas 75461-9037
Dear Mr. Boots:
The Breakfast Optimist Club of Paris strongly
supports the efforts being taken in the development of a
comprehensive plan for park development within the City of
Paris. We believe such action will contribute greatly
toward improving our park system for many years to come.
There is no question that we are fortunate to
have an existing park system which has provided the citizens
of Paris with excellent facilities for many years. As our
city continues to grow, however, a comprehensive plan for
additional facilities is needed which will serve to meet the
needs of both old and young alike in the future.
We appreciate very much the efforts of both you and the
Paris City Council in this regard. If we can be of any
assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
~~~~
Bill Bell, President
Breakfast Optimist Club
; N-----
- .
\ :'('",1 '
-'.' ~
January 10, 1995
Mr. Dick Boots
City Hall
Paris, Texas 75460
Dear Dick:
I am writing this letter in support of making the renovation of Wade Park a priority in the
city's master plan. I'm sure your statistics indicate that Wade Park is the most widely
utilized park in Paris. As a native of Paris, my family has used the park for the last 30
years for general recreation as well as for special occasions such as birthday parties and
family gatherings. (I can even remember when my mother, sisters. brother and I would
walk from our house on Culbertson to the wading pool at Wade Park.) As director of the
Lamar County Even Start Family Literacy program, we have used the park for family
picnics and activities.
I was involved with the Jaycees many years ago when they were putting in some of the
equipment. Although the park has served many families, the existing equipment is
extremely outdated and, in my opinion, several pieces are not safe. Adding play
equipment which is developmentally appropriate and actually sectioning off the grounds
according to age level would be a wonderful improvement to the park. I would also like
to see equipment that could be used by children who are physically challenged.
I am most definitely in favor of improving Wade Park to make it more accommodating
and accessible to a greater number of people. Its location is good and the setting is nice.
I feel this should be an item of high priority for the city, and I would appreciate your
consideration of such.
If you have questions or if I can be of assistance with this endeavor, please do not hesitate
to call on me.
s~1t dc, uLd
Pam Christian, Director
/c
..... \ j " '.'-'''' ..~. ..-- 1'1 "';*
I ., .,. \ I
~. '! ...~.. . '." ....l ,
__ 'y ~..... I 'J __\! j; j
Phone (903) 737-4340. Fax (903\ 737'43~3 . . JS Grd'~C Ave~'l,8 . ?d'-is.Tex3s 75~6C
January 7, 1995
3025 Oak Creek Drive
Paris, TX 75462
Mr. Dick Boots
Paris Parks Department
Paris, TX 75460
I wish to express my support for the building of a public swimming pool in Paris, Texas.
Swimming should be encouraged for a wide variety of reasons. It is an excellent aerobic
exerdse for people of all sizes, shapes, and fitness levels. It is a lifetime sport enjoyed by
people of all ages. It lends itself well to both individual and team competitions in not
only speed swimming but synchronized swimming as well. The presence of a public
swimming pool would also help the YWCA, Red Cross, and many other groups to
decrease the number of non-swimmers in our community. This would then help
decrease the number of drownings each year in area lakes. And, of course, swimming is
fun! Wider access to swimming should be encouraged.
None of the school districts in Lamar County currently has a swim team. The schools do
not have the money to both construct a swimming pool and fund the program. With an
appropriately designed swimming pool in the community, it might soon become feasible
for one or more of the school districts to endose the fadlity to permit year-round swim
training necessary for a successful program.
The community has already shown a strong interest in swimming. Aerofit, a local health
dub, has built an indoor four-lane swimming pool for aerobic workouts as well as fitness
and recreatiorJaI swimming. The pool is adequate for Aerofit's needs but is not widely
accessible to most people in Paris due to its expense. A private group of swimmers and
their parents have also organized a swim team that practices at Aerofit's pool. Again, the
pool is adequate but often too expensive for most people to utilize. I personally know of
several people who have been forced to quit the swim team due to its expense. The
presence of a public pool would dramatically open access to swimming instruction to
many other community members.
As a physidan, community leader, certified Red Cross swim coach, and father of four
swimmers, I feel uniquely qualified to state unequivocally that a public swimming pool
would be a wonderful asset to this community and would improve the quality of life for
folks of all ages in the Paris area.
Sincerely,
/~ t'/fi
Steven J. Clifford, M.D.
J\
,I
1/10/95
Dear Mr. Boots,
When my family moved here 8 years ago I was very much
surprised Paris did not have a public pool. I have been a Red
Cross swimming and lifequarding instructor for many years at
many pools and feel a city pool adds to the overall attraction
of families to any community.
Being involved with Paris for the past 8 years I feel it
is not only a need but a necessity for this community, to service
ALL families with appropriate recreation facilities instead
of letting someone else or group meet these demands.
Let the City of Paris do it right!
I fully support your efforts to build a City pool and offer
my services if needed.
Sincerely, /.
, -Ift;!tt(. (/ (d((/(itrh
Kristin A. Carmack
+@
January 9, 1995
Toni Donnan
525 SE 42nd
Paris, TX 75460
784-2305
Dear Mr. Boots,
Jean Campbell has asked me to write a letter in support
of a public swimming pool for the City of Paris. I do not
know where to begin, except to say HOORAY! ! ! !! With all the
open water available in and around Lamar County, our citizens
are limited in the availability of public swimming
instruction and supervised aquatic facilities to practice and
improve swimming skills that they have learned.
As an avid supporter of water activities, I applaud and
encourage the City to provide our citizens with an
affordable and professionally supervised and maintained
aquatic facility.
SinCerelY~
~ l!\'-~' \k-' ~",~.r_
'-'-"'-,
Toni Donnan
WSI, AEA, AFAP Certified
Co
r
1/10/95
City of Paris
Department of Parks and Recreation
. Mr. Dick Boots, Director
Dear Mr. Boots:
I am writing this letter as a Minister, a board member of several community outreach
programs and as a resident of Paris. I want to express to you how passionate I feel about
the need for a public swimming pool in our community. As a parent I have wished there
were some place for my child to swim in the summer. I have also been painfully conscious
of the fact that we live in a community that has a strong history of racial segregation.
The thought of having a municipal swimming pool at a high visibility location such as the
one suggested on the loop, would be a powerful statement about our intentionality of being
a progressive community. As board chairman of Co-Ministry, I see a great need for
recreational resources in our community which can be afforded by everyone. As a minister
I see a need for our children and youth to have a supervised community recreation resource
which can be utilized by entire families.
I will support the issue of building a public swimming pool in every way possible. It will be
good for our children, and good for Paris' image where growth and progress are concerned.
Thank you for yourcoysideration,
..-'--j /
. ~ t ___.J /
/ ,) -vy9/~
"E..Ross Richrdson
\..
First
_Christian
.1. ~~~:~~rist)
Rev. E. Ross Richardson
780 20th N.E.
Paris, Texas 75460
(903) 785.5516
~
-_\~,
IP $-\{2~~ Ti!OOOO~~ $-\~~~~$-\W@)OO
fP..@..(OOJ!:lg,oo
fP~~" m:l ~
l?lm)m: 'll~ @X 'll~'ll4}ID
January 14, 1995
To: Mr. Dick Boots
Parks & Recreation Commissioner
City of Paris
Paris, Tx 75460
From: Executive Committee
Paris Tennis Association, Inc
Dear Mr. Boots:
We are very concerned about the future of tennis in Paris. We
believe it is imperative that plans for court renovation or building of
new courts be included in any Master Plan involving future
improvements to recreation and parks in Paris.
The Paris Tennis Association (PT A) was reactivated in 1988 by
about 6 people. Since that time it has grown to a steady membership
of approximately 200 including 65 juniors.
The PT A exists to make and keep tennis available to people of
all ages in Paris and the surrounding towns. The PT A is the ollly
organization providing this service for a 100 mile radius. Players,
who are not members of private clubs, must drive 2 hours to play
organized tennis. Although tennis is a sport that can be enjoyed by
anyone for all of their active life, it is not easy to learn. It is
difficult for somebody to just pick up a racquet and start hitting the
ball across the net with any effectiveness at all. For this reason we
believe that organized tennis is very important to the community. The
PT A is the community's vehicle for teaching the basics to beginning
players . not just how to play the game . but also how to act on and
off the courts.
Facilities Inventory Change:
Park: Wade Park
Location: 25" Street NE at Pine Bluff Street
Topography: Flat with scattered mature trees
Improvements in the park:
35 picnic tables II park benches
30'x60' pavilion 2 handicap accessible tables
2 handic!IP accessible water fountains I restroom/handicap accessible
2 shuffleboard courts I 80'x 150' playground with equipment
I 30'x80' playground with equipment 2 casual backstops
Support facilities:
Paved parking for 60 cars/handicap accessible
Gravel parking for 20 cars
Surrounding neighborhood:
ResIdentIal on all sides.
Size: 8.44 Acres
Facilities Inventory Addition:
Park: Aquatic Center
Location: 1625 Clement Road
Topography: Flat
Improvements in the park:
25 yd. x 25 m. 6 lane municip'a1 pool
Bathhouse and restroom faCilities
Showers
4 park benches
Staff office facilities
Irrigation system
Support facIlities:
Paved parking for approximately 40 cars.
Surrounding neighborhood:
Bounded on the south by Clement Road and Skateland, bounded on the west by wooded land, on the north
by loop 286 and on the east by Apex Plumbing.
Comment: This park was completed in 1997 and new to our facility inventory.
Size:
4.325 Acres
13 yd. x 10 yd. wading pool
Shaded Deck area
VendimuConcessions
Diving coard
Fencing
Facilities Inventory Additions:
Park: Dragon P~k Size: 52 Acres
Location: 24 street and Jefferson
Topography: Flat with scattered mature trees
Improvements in the park:
I mile walking/jogging track small restroom facility
Support facilities:
Gravel parking for approximately 150 cars.
Surrounding neighborhood:
Bounded on the north by Paris Junior College. on the east by the Love Civic Center, on the south by Paris
High School, and bounded on the west by woods.
Comments:
This park was acquired in December 1997 from Paris Junior College.
...............................................
Park: Depot Park Size: 6 Acres
Location: West Kaufman Street
Topography: Flat
Improvements in the park: none
Support Facilities: Paved parking for approximately 150 cars.
EXHIBIT A
. Surrounding neighborhood:
Bounded on the north by Kaufman and Coke Plant. on the east by the Lamar
County Historical Society Museum. on the south by Sherman St., and bounded on
the west by the City of Paris Historical Transportation Depot Museum and the
Paris Chamber of Commerce.
Public Participation
At a public hearing on October 8, 1998. residents expressed interest in the following parks and recreation needs.
These needs should be included with the original needs in the 1995 Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
I) A lack of adequate baseball and softball diamonds. There is substantial demand for a multipurpose facility. designed
for use by a wide range of ages, as well as different genders. Current facilities are not capable of serving the growing
participation of these programs in the city.
2) The equipment at Record Park is aged and obsolete. None of the playground equipment or pavilion areas are
accessible to the handicap.
3) The participant parking. concessions and field space is inadequate for the growing participation of the local soccer
program. Currently, over 600 participants play on only 6 fields.
Re-prioritized List of Recommended Proiects:
I. MultipurDose Sports Complex
Many participants voiced concern over a lack of slow pitch and fast pitch softball facilities for youth and teens. There
are currently only 4 lighted softball diamonds available for this age group. The city has an abundance of baseball and
softball activities taking place which forces very strict schedules for field usage. Review of these needs raised the
possibility of also providing additional practice backstops and green space for practice times.
Estimated Cost (Exclusive of
Land)..........................................................................................................................$250.000-500.000
2. Record Park Improvements
Record Park is one of the largest, most active parks in the city. All of the facilities and equipment in the park are
damaged or obsolete. Parking is limited to curbside parking near the existing playground equipment and asphalt
parking on the far north end at the softball diamond. None of the facility is handicap accessible. The current pavilion
is not adequate for the participation and special events held in the park each year. Therefore. the pavilion. parking
and playground equipment should be upgraded or replaced.
Estimated Cost (Exclusive of
Land)..................................................................................................................................$200,000
3. Dfalon Park Improvements
Dragon Park is a new park to the Parks and Recreation Department. This park was leased from Paris Junior
College in December 1997. The park consist of approximately 52 acres on the far south-east side of the city.
Current improvements include a I mile walking track. stretch stations and a small restroom facility that should all
be upgraded. Parking is very limited to participants. Most of the land has never been utilized. This facility
borders the current soccer association complex. therefore adding soccer fields. parking, concessions and
restrooms, keeping the appropriate green space should complete this area appropriately. The city is currently
working with the Army Reserves to build approx. 15 soccer fields although. lighting. parking. irrigation, restrooms
and concessions should be pursued in the future.
Estimated Cost........................................................... .... .............. .......... ......... .......... .......... ...... .........$250,000-350,000
4. Lake Crook Recreation Area Development
Lake Crook has never been developed to its fullest potential. The existing boat ramp is dilapidated and needs
replacement but even so is inaccessible because of uneven ground and erosion. Restrooms in the small picnic area
were destroyed years ago and the old swimming area needs vegetation removal and cleanup. The development could
be enhanced through the installation of new picnic areas and group picnic pavilion, paved parking, hike and bike trails,
restrooms, playground equipment, and recreational vehicle camping pads with utility hook ups. However, such
Improvements will be meaningless unless the access road is reworked entirely. The old road is covered with mud and
eroded severely. This natural facility has much potential and could be developed in several phases if necessary. If
adequately designed. the camping area could become an economic boom to the area Instead of a liability.
Estimated Cost........................................................ .......... ......... ............... ......... ................... ......... ....$400,000-600.000
5. Upllrade Parks Citywide
Parks throughout the city have play equipment which do not meet current standards for safety or have been
vandalized in the past. Some of the equipment is over thirty years old. Shelters are needed in several parks across
the city. Tables need to be replaced. especially those with wooden tops or built out of concrete and stone.
Handicapped accessible tables are needed. Ballfield fences are in need of replacement. having outlived their useful
lives.
Estimated Cost....................................................... ....... ........ ......... ..... ............ ....... .......... ......... .............. ......... ..$60.000
6. Restroom Facilities
Presently, there are public restrooms only at two parks. The city rents portable toilets during the summer months
costing $8,000 to $10,000 per year. Permanent vandal resistant restrooms should be built that meet accessibility
standards for the handicapped. They should be lockable. weli lighted and of course well maintained. Vandal resistant
lighting is also a must. Because they are so susceptible to vandalism. restrooms should be built in high use parks such
as Culbertson, Oak. and Record. Generally. these are the parks where reservations are made for large groups and
restrooms could be unlocked. The smaller neighborhood parks may not need these facilities.
Estimated Cost.................................... .................................. ......................................................................... .$1 00,000
7. Paved Parkinr
Many of the parks have gravel or dirt parking facilities. New driveways in Paris must be dust free and thus paved.
Paving the parking areas wlli bring them into compliance with current standards. improve drainage, promote usage
of the parks, and improve handicapped and elderly access.
Estimated Cost................................................ ................................................. ................................... ..$50,000-1 75,000
8. Recreation Facilities
Many residents in the past have voiced concerns about a community recreation center. A local middle school created
a public campaign in 1997 to increase interest. A teen recreation center has received a lot of support as well. Review
of this project raises the possibility of developing a multipurpose area consisting of a community recreation center.
2 outdoor basketball courts, 6 lighted tennis courts and 3 baseball/softball practice backstops.
Estimated Cost.............................................................. ...... .............. ....... ................. ...... ...............$400.000-$2,000.000
9. Security U"htinll All parks should be furnished with minimal security lighting to provide safe usage at night. and
reduce vandalism and crime.
Estimated Cost......................................................... ................ .............. ........ ......... ...... ............ ........................ .$50.000
10. Land Acquisition
The city as it expands will need to add parks and recreation land through dedication or purchase. In particular, areas
which should be looked at include east of Loop 286 and west of 286 near the U.S. Highway 82 corridor. Inside the
Loop, we recommend negotiations with Paris ISD for a possible neighborhood park on the corner of the Crockett
Middle School Campus since this area is not served by a nearby. neighborhood park.
Proiect Time Table
The following time schedule Is recommended for orderly development or re-development of parks and recreation in
Paris:
Priority I
Priority 2
Priority 3
Priority 4
Priority 5
Priority 6
Priority 7
Priority 6
Priority 9
Priority 10
Multipurpose Sports Complex.......................................................................................'.....1999-2000
Record Park Improvements...............................................................................................1999-2000
Dragon Park Improvements...............................................................................................1999-2000
lake Crook Improvements (Phase 1)..................................................................................1996-1999
lake Crook Improvements (Phase 2).............................................................................2000
Lake Crook Improvements (Phase 3).............................................................................200 I
Upgrade Parks Oty Wide...........................................................................................Budget Annually
Restroom facilities.................................... ..................................................... ......... .......... 1999-200 I
Paved Parking................................................................................................... ................. 1999-2000
Recreation facility........................................................................................................ ..2002
Security Ughting................................................................................................................ 1999-2000
land Acquisition............................................................................................................. Ongoing
Project Fundin!:
An ambitious plan of development with several million dollars in construction cost alone, not including land acquisition,
dictates some creative and varied fund raising. Some of these projects can be paid for through the operating budget.
capital improvement bond funds or certificates of obligation. The City of Paris has indicated Its willingness to apply
for grants-in-aid. the most prominent of which are:
Texas DeDartment of Housin.. and Communit;y Affairs
Community Development Block Grants are federal funds distributed from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development directly to states who in turn distribute through a complicated regional point system to counties and
cities. The Oty of Paris or any other incorporated area or the county may make application. Park development is
eligible. A local match of ten to twenty percent is usually necessary for the maximum grant of $250,000. The
complication is that, in the Intense competition for such funds, only ten to twelve of nearly forty grant applications are
usually funded in the Council of Governments region. Parks are usually not high enough on the regional priority scale
(set by the Regional Review Committees themselves) to score sufficient points.
Parks and WildlifelTexas Recreation & Parks Account Program Texas
This program has long been used by cities and counties to fund park improvements. In fact, several parks in Paris were
developed or enhanced with this program. The program requires a 50% local match which can be In the form of a
donated force account (applicant's own work forces and equipment). donated labor and/or equipment, cash, or
donated land or combinations of all. Applications are received by TPWD on January 31 and July 31 of each year and
funding is usually announced 6 to 8 months later. Grant offers follow soon thereafter and allow three years from grant
signature for project completion.
The program was recently amended to add some really attractive features; for example. non-park public lands can now
be converted to park use and count as part of the local match in much the same way as donated lands. This includes
public lands owned by independent school districts, junior colleges and other public entities. An old landfill or sewage
plant, if the land is acceptable for park use. can be converted and the city gets matching funds up to its appraised value.
Texas Parks and Wildlife Boat Ramp Fund
Texas Parks and Wildlife has funds available for boat ramps under a separate application procedure.
Conclusion
Based on public hearings, invitations to solicit comments, and staff input. the City of Paris should proceed with
development and refurbishment of parks and recreation facilities. The argument will surely be made that parks and
recreation facilities cost money to build and operate and are surely "money losers". The public should keep in mind,
however, that streets and sldewalks are not money makers either to any extent. For that matter, police and fire
departments are not self supporting. Parks and Recreation facilities perhaps add more natural beauty to our
community than any of these other departments or facilities combined. There are simply some things in city
government that the public demands, despite the fact that there will be little or no revenues to off-set expenses of
providing those facilities.
RESOLUTION NO. 2.001-105
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS,
PARIS, TEXAS, AMENDING THE PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTERPLAN FOR THE CITY OF PARIS; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS
AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council ofthe City of Paris did heretofore, on the 26th day ofJ anuary,
1995, by Resolution No. 95-018, adopt the "Parks and Recreation Masterplan for the City of Paris";
and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris did heretofore, on the 9th day of
November, 1998, by Resolution No. 98-162, amend said Masterplan to reflect the "Parks and
Recreation Master Plan Changes and Additions"; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris did heretofore, on the 9th day of April,
2001, by Resolution No. 2001-044, award a professional services contract to MHS Planning &
Design for the provision of consulting services for the development of a Sports Complex Master
Plan and recommendations regarding revisions to the Parks and Recreation Masterplan based on
local needs established through said Sports Complex Master Plan; and,
WHEREAS, MHS Planning & Design and the Public Works Director have made various
recommendations regarding needed revisions to said Parks and Recreation Masterplan, attached
hereto as Exhibit A, and it is deemed appropriate that said revisions be approved and adopted;
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS,
TEXAS:
Section 1. That the findings set out in the preamble to this resolution are hereby in all things
approved.
Section 2. That the revisions to the Parks and Recreation Masterplan for the City of Paris,
attached hereto as Exhibit A, in accordance with the recommendations made by MHS Planning &
Design and the Public Works Director, be, and the same are hereby, approved and adopted.
Section 3. That this resolution shall be effective from and after the date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day ofJuly, 2001.
~~
ichaelJ. Pfi er, or
ATTEST:
Mattie
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~~F
City of Paris
Parks and Recreation Master
Plan
Addendum 2001
EXHIBIT A
---_.._-~-_.,._._---_.- ---..----.--
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this addendum is to provide an update to the Parks and Recreation Master
Plan adopted in 1995 and subsequently amended in 1998. This information is intended to
guide the City of Paris in decisions related to parks, recreation, and open space within the
city, to assist in the implementation ofthose decisions, and to set guidelines for future park
and open space development that are feasible for Paris in accordance with the desires of its
citizens. This addendum includes all land within the incorporated limits of the City of Paris
and provides parks and open space project recommendations through 2006.
The following pages contain additional goals and objectives for the city's park and open
space system, the methodology used to update the plan and a section on natural open space.
Also included is a revised implementation program developed to guide the City in
accomplishing the proposed projects within the plan's time frame and additional funding
sources available to the City for the development of its park system.
The Census 2000 results indicate the population ofthe City of Paris to be 25,898. The current
ethnic breakdown for the City of Paris is 73% Caucasion, 22% African American, I % Native
American, I % Asian, and 3% Other. Additionally, 4% ofthe population indicated they are
of Hispanic origin. The U.s. Housing and Urban Development data indicates a median
family income of $38,800 with approximately 72% of households considered low income.
I
II. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The following Goals and Objectives are provided in addition to those adopted in the Parks
and Recreation Master Plan for the City of Paris. Their purpose is to give direction for future
community decisions regarding parks, recreation, and open space. These goals and
objectives were established based on representative group interviews, community meetings,
and input from the professional staff ofthe City.
Open Space Goal:
To continually identify, protect and preserve quality natural open spaces for unstructured
recreational activities, inherent aesthetic value and protection of valuable ecosystems.
Objectives:
~ To continually research the viability of developing trail systems along creeks, flood
ways, and utility easements that will link park facilities, neighborhoods, and school
campuses.
~ To be proactive in the protection and/or acquisition of unique natural open spaces for
public use.
~ To limit development in natural open spaces in order to minimize adverse effects on
valuable ecosystems.
~ To address natural open space needs when developing active recreational facilities
in order to provide citizens with a well balanced recreational experience that includes
both active and passive opportunities.
2
III. METHODOLOGY
The planning process used in the development of this update included an extensive review
of the existing Plan and numerous public hearings. The citizens of Paris were involved in
each major step of the planning process, which provided invaluable local insight needed to
produce and implement a successful master plan update. It should be noted that the
professional staff ofthe City of Paris was constantly involved through the planning process
to insure the update resulted in a feasible and balanced park program for the city that once
implemented, will fully serve the active and passive recreational needs of the community.
The City of Paris conducted three public hearings and four focus group sessions in order to
address the needs and concerns of the citizens with regard to the park system. The focus
group sessions included representatives from the various organized sports associations,
members ofthe Civic Center Board, the Paris Chamber of Commerce and the City of Paris
Parks and Recreation Staff. These input sessions allowed citizens to express concerns with
the existing park facilities as well as addressing the needs for future park facilities.
Using the information obtained from the citizens, the project priorities recommended in the
1998 update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan were revisited. A revised
implementation schedule was developed which outlines a feasible plan to assist the City in
accomplishing the recommendations within the Plan's time frame.
3
IV. GREENBELT AND NATURAL OPEN SPACE NEEDS
The City needs to adopt a policy of acquiring property along creeks, drainage easements and
floodways as it becomes available. This will provide the necessary land for future trail
projects linking parks, schools and neighborhoods while providing passive recreational
opportunities. Additionally, parcels containing unique topography, character or other natural
features should be acquired and preserved as natural open space to reflect the unique natural
resources ofthe Paris community. Future park land acquisition should allow for natural open
space in both neighborhood parks and community parks to provide residents with
opportunities for primitive recreation. Generally, these types of recreational opportunities can
be broken down further into greenbelts and natural areas.
Greenbelts
Greenbelts or greenbelt parkways are linear parks usually developed around a natural
resource such as a creek, river, utility easement, or lake shore. The potential benefits of a
greenbelt system are numerous. Not only can a greenbelt system preserve valuable open
space and natural habitat, it can provide a natural environment for walking, jogging, and
bicycling trails, provide a transportation corridor linking neighborhoods to parks, schools,
and shopping areas and provide a variety of passive recreational opportunities free, or
relatively free, from automobile interference. Greenbelts also serve as natural buffers
between land uses, serve as utility (underground) easements, and can usually be acquired at
a relatively inexpensive price due to the restrictions on development. Design standards for
greenbelts are relatively loose in order to allow the maximum use of the natural environment
in the design. Greenbelt corridor widths are often determined by the existing topography,
severity offlooding, and other unique natural features. Greenbelt corridors ofless than fifty
4
(50) "useable" feet should be avoided and narrow corridor sections kept to a minimum. One-
hundred foot corridor widths and wider give flexibility in design and are encouraged
wherever possible.
Natural Areas
Natural areas are spaces containing ecosystems in a non-disturbed state with minimal man-
made intrusions. Natural areas lend a certain aesthetic and functional diversity to a park
network and urban landscape. Although the benefits of natural areas are hard to quantify,
they are numerous and include preservation of wildlife habitat and opportunities for nature
study. When flood plains are preserved as natural areas they offer a resource to aid in the
protection from flooding. A resource based approach should be used, due to the unique
character and availability of natural resources in a city like Paris. This approach enables the
City to identify the natural resources found in the community, and define how those areas
will be used in order to best satisfy the needs ofthe citizens. There are no national standards
for natural areas within a city due to the extreme variations found in natural resources from
region to region. The City of Paris should, through the established planning processes, adopt
open space policies which reflect the natural resources of the community. Natural areas or
open lands with environmental significance should not be included in a level of service
standard since these lands have limited capability for recreational use beyond desirable and
limited passive recreation, interpretation and environmental education. It is important that
natural areas not be perceived as surplus land which can be used for more active forms of
recreation as the need arises.
5
One of the major issues that arose in all of the public input sessions was the lack of natural open
space in the existing park system. Citizens expressed a desire to set aside natural open space such
as the area found along Big Sandy Creek located north of Love Civic Center. This creek corridor
contains unique natural features not found in the existing park system. Citizens also expressed a
desire to include passive recreational opportunities in the development of a needed multipurpose
sports complex. One participant pointed out that if a variety of recreational opportunities are
provided, including both active and passive, residents are assured year round use and enjoyment of
the park. This will provide citizens with the desired primitive recreational opportunities while also
providing the needed athletic facilities for structured recreation.
PROJECT PRIORITIES
Based on the Goals and Objectives, citizen input and Staff recommendations, the following projects
for parks, recreation, and open space are recommended.
1. Land Acquisition for Multipuroose Sports Complex
Many citizens expressed a desire to include primitive recreational opportunities in conjunction with the
development of a multipurpose sports complex. Approximately 70 acres of land are needed to develop the
first phase of the complex. The property adjacent to Love Civic Center contains the open space needed for
the athletic facilities and provides the desired natural open space along Big Sandy Creek.
Estimated Cost .................................................................................................................... .$225,000
2. Multipurpose Sports Complex (Phase I)
Phase I ofthe complex should include 1/2 mile multi-use paved trail, two (2) 200' softball fields, two (2) 300'
softball fields, a small water feature, playground, picnic stations, fishing pier at the water feature, parking
for 100 vehicles and a restroom/concession building.
Estimated Cost ........... ....... ... ..............................................................................................$1 ,300,000
6
. 3. Multipuroose Sports Complex (phase II)
Phase II of the complex should include one (1) teen league/ select baseball/ adult softball field, picnic
statiops, two (2) sand volleyball courts and a community recreation center/natatorium.
Estimated Cost .................................................................................................................. .$3 ,500,000
4. Multipurpose Sports Complex (phase III)
Phase III of the complex should include two (2) 200' softball fields, one (I) 300' softball field, four (4) batting
cages, four (4) portable pitching mounds, one (I) covered multi-use sports court area, toddler playground,
picnic stations and additional parking.
Estimated Cost ................ ................................................. .... ..............................................$1 ,200,000
5. Dral!on Park Improvements
Dragon Park was acquired from Paris Junior College in 1997 and existing improvements include a one mile
walking/jogging trail with stretching stations, a small restroom facility and two soccer fields. Thirteen (13)
additional soccer fields are planned for the park and parking improvements are needed as well.
Estimated Cost ................................................................................$25,000 - $30,000 per soccer field
6. Lake Crook Recreation Area Development
Lake Crook has never been developed to its fullest potential. Restrooms in the small picnic area were
destroyed years ago and the old swimming area needs vegetation removal and cleanup. The development
could be enhanced through the installation of new picnic areas and group picnic pavilion, paved parking, hike
and bike trails, restrooms, playground equipment, and recreational vehicle camping pads with utility hook
ups. However, such improvements will be meaningless unless the access road is reworked entirely. The old
road is covered with mud and has eroded severely. This natural facility has much potential and could be
developed in several phases if necessary. If adequately designed, the camping area could become an
economic boom to the area instead of a liability. Areas that contain unique natural elements should be
preserved as natural open space.
Estimated Cost ................................................................................................... .$400,000 - $600,000
7
7. Restroom Facilities
. Presently, there are public restroom facilities only at two parks. The City rents portable toilets during the
summer months which costs $8,000 to $10,000 per year. Permanent vandal resistant restrooms should be
built that meet accessibility standards for the handicapped. They should be lockable, well lighted and of
course well maintained. Vandal resistant lighting is also a must. Because they are so susceptible to
vandalism, restrooms should be built in high use parks such as Culbertson, Oak, and Record. Generally, these
are the parks where reservations are made for large groups and restrooms could be unlocked. The smaller
neighborhood parks may not need these facilities.
Estimated Cost ..........................................................................................$50,000 - $70,000 per park
8. Land Acauisition
As the city expands, it will need to add parks and recreation land through dedication or purchase. In
particular, areas which should be looked at include east of Loop 286 and west of286 near the U.S. Highway
82 corridor. Inside the Loop, the City should begin dialoge with Paris ISD regarding a possible neighborhood
park on the comer of the Crockett Middle School Campus since this area is not within the service area of an
existing neighborhood park.
Estimated Cost .. ................. ... ... ........ ... .......... .... ........ ............. ................ .................. .......... ..$30,000
NOTE: Costs are preliminary estimates only and prepared without the benefit of detailed engineering data. All
costs shown are based on 2001 dollars. Final construction costs will vary.
8
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
The following table depicts the project priorities with. suggested completion dates. It is important to
note that the following schedule is intended to be a flexible guide for development Parks and
Recreational Facilities over the next five years for the City of Paris. The City should evaluate and
take advantage of any unforseen opportunities that may arise that are not identified in the schedule
or change the order of implementation if necessary.
Project Date Estimated Potential Funding Source
Cost
I Acquire Land for Multiuse Sports 2001 $225,000 T.P.&W Grant (outdoor)
Complex Donation
2 Multipurpose Sports Complex 2001-2002 $1,300,000 T.P.&W Grant (outdoor)
(Phase I) Certificates of Obligation
General Obligation Bond
3 Multipurpose Sports Complex 2003-2004 $ 3,500,000 T.P.&W Grant (outdoor)
(Phase II) Certificates of Obligation
T.P.&W Grant (indoor)
4 Multipurpose Sports Complex 2005-2006 $1,200,000 T.P.&W Grant (outdoor)
(Phase III) Certificates of Obligation
General Obligation Bond
5 Dragon Park Improvements 2002 $25,000 - General Fund
30,000/field General Obligation Bond
6 Lake Crook Recreation Area 2003-2004 $400,000 - T.P.&W Grant (outdoor)
Improvements 600,000 General Fund
General Obligation Bond
T.P.&W Grant (Boatramp)
7 Restroom Facilities 2005-2006 $50,000- General Fund
70,000/park Certificates of Obligation
8 Land Acquisition 2004-2006 $30,000/ T.P.&W Grant (outdoor)
neighborhood General Fund
Dark General Oblillation Bond
Note: Costs are preliminary estimates only and prepared withoutthe benefit of detailed engineering data. All costs
shown are based on 200 I dollars. Final construction costs will vary.
9
VIII. IMPLEMENTATION - EXISTING AND AVAILABLE MECHANISMS
,
.
In order to implement this park and open space plan update, there are a variety of funding
mechanisms and tools available for use by the City of Paris. These include:
SENATE BILL 376-4A - SALES TAX REVENUES - Funds generated by this special sales tax
can be used for developing and maintaining public recreational facilities following a
referendum.
TEXAS RECREATION & PARKS ACCOUNT PROGRAM - This program, administered by
Texas Parks and Wildlife, is a matching grant program which may be used to aid communities
in acquisition and development of parks and open space. This grant program includes the
Outdoor Recreation Acquisition and Development Program and the Texas Recreation & Parks
Account Indoor Recreation Program. The Texas Recreation & Parks Account Small Grants
Program is a matching grant program which may be used to aid communities with a population
less than 50,000 in the development of parks and open space.
PAY AS YOU GO - This method of financing park improvements involves budgeting for land
acquisition, development, and maintenance of park facilities through the city's annual budget
process. Allocations for park improvements are made and spent annually through the standard
budget process.
10
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS - These bonds are issued by the city following an election
in which the voters authorize their issuance for specific stated purposes, as well as the necessary
tax increases to support them. These bonds pledge the property or ad valorem taxing power of
the city.
CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION - These certificates have basically the same effect as
general obligation bonds except they do not require an election to authorize them. An election
can be petitioned by five percent of the registered voters of the city. These certificates are
issued on the authorization of the City Council. Repayment is based on the property taxing
power of the city, utility system revenues, or a combination ofthe two.
USER FEES - This method of financing requires the eventual user of each park to pay a fee for
the use of each facility. Fees to be charged users can be established to pay for debt service,
maintenance, and operation ofthe park system.
PRIVATE OR CORPORATE DONATIONS - Donations from foundations, corporations,
and/or private individuals are often used to acquire and develop parks. The city should
constantly identify and pursue opportunities to receive such funding for parks. One avenue for
receiving donations is through the use of the Texas Parks & Recreation Foundation. This
foundation has been developed to help all communities in the State of Texas to maximize the
benefits of donations of land, property, and money.
II