22 Fiscal managementCITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING SHEET
Submittal Date:
Originaring Department:
Presented By:
Agenda Item No.:
03/02/09
Council Date:
City Council
Kevin Carruth
22.
03/09/09
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Not an action item
PoLIcY IssuE(s):
Fiscal management
BACKGROUND:
Rules and procedures for allocating funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (i.e. the
Federal stimulus bill) are mostly still being developed. There is a strong emphasis on projects that are
"shovel ready," i.e. can be started within 12 months. So far the City has applied to the Texas Water
Development Board for $9,970,000 from the Drinking Water State Revolving Loan program and
$10,545,000 from the Clean Water State Revolving Loan program. The projects selected for inclusion
were taken from the City's ten-year capital improvement plan. It has yet to be determined if any
funding would be in the form of a low interest loan, no interest loan, forgivable loan, or some
combination of the three.
TxDOT Aviation has also called late this week and asked if the City would consider doing phases I and
II of the four-year airport grant project at once. They anticipate getting an allocation of stimulus money
and since the priority is shovel ready projects they are planning on accelerating their current capital plan.
The first two phases are primarily engineering and planning and phases III and IV are mostly
construction.
All departments are monitoring the developing process so we can apply as details become available.
This week TML developed a website (see http://www.tml.org/legislative_stimulus.html) as an
information clearinghouse for cities.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
EXHIBITS:
Council Member Agenda Item Request Form, DWSRF and CWSRF applications
ACTION:
BUDGET INFO:
❑ Financial Report ❑ Minute Order
Expense
$
❑ Department Report ❑ Resolution
Budgeted Amt.
$
Z Presentation ❑ Ordinance
y'I'D Actual
$
❑ Public Hearing ❑ Other
Acct. Name
Acct. Number
FISCAL NOTES:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Z Administration E City Clerk ❑ Community Development ❑ EMS/IT ❑ Finance ❑ Fire
❑ Municipal Court ❑ Legal ❑ Library ❑ Police ❑ Eng./Public Works ❑ Utilities
City of Paris 0OU2~~ Revised 2/04/08
COUNCIL MEMBER AGENDA ITEM REQUEST
Please complete this form if you wish to have an item placed on the agenda for a City Council
meeting. To allow adequate time to prepare packets and to coincide with staff's deadline for
items, the due date for placing an item on the agenda is noon Thursday, 12 days prior to the
regular meetings on the second and fourth Monday of each month (i.e. the Thursday immediately
following a regular Monday meeting). In order for your fellow Council Members to fully
understand your item, have productive discussion, ensure eff'icient council meetings, and for staff
to be able to assist you as completely as possible, it is important that you describe the item with
as much detail as possible and include any supporting documentation so that it may be included
in the Council's meeting packets. Please return this completed form to the City Manager and
contact the Ciry Clerk at (903) 784-9248 if you have any questions.
Council member making request:
❑ Will Biard ❑ Joe McCarthy
❑ Steve Brown Z Edwin Pickle
❑ Jesse Freelen ❑ Rhonda Rogers
❑ Kevin Kear
Description of Item: Dtscussion of the Funding Requests for the City ot Paris
in relatton to the propose! Federal Stimulus Package at the Rederal and
state level.
Are additional sheets or supporting materials attached? ❑ Yes Z No
I request that this item be placed on the agenda for the:
Signature:
❑ City o ii i m e ng on this date: February 23, 2009
❑ Sometime in the next 2 meetings
❑ No specific time in mind - just keep it on a list of pending issues
{
Date: February 10, 2009
City of Paris Revised 11/19/08
ODU22a
M~
d ~
CO 11, ~ winr . f
~.1~~
January 23, 2009
Dear Reviewer:
Transmitted herewith please find an application from the City of Paris for inclusion on the 2010 DWSRF IUP. We
appreciate the opportunity working with the Texas Water Development Board.
The improvements outlined include a primary project and a secondary project. Both projects will improve the
ability to ensure superior water is delivered to its customers for the following reasons:
• The old cast iron lines are heavily turberculated. The tuberculation not only greatly reduces the flushing
capacity and fire protection flow capacity of the lines, but also provides locations for sediment and
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) to reside. We suspect this combination has profound effects chloramine
residual decay in these areas. Therefore, we suspect the new water lines would impmve chloramine
residual.
• The old lines are also sources of heavy maintenance on City repair crews having to constantly go out and
repair leaks. This would greatly reduce outages in the area while reducing the yearly maintenance costs.
Also, the new lines should greatly reduce the water loss noted within the system.
• The water line replacements will improve our retail and industrial development as well as redevelopment in
older parts of Paris.
• During periods of higher demand, system pressure impmvement should be recognized in the area by
replacing the old turberculated cast iron lines.
• Repairing and repainting the 1-million gallon elevated tank will allow the City to continue to provide it's
citizens with the best water possible.
• The secondary project will include a new bridge to the water treatment plant. The new bridge will ensure
safe passage during inclement weather and provide full-time access to the plant. The former bridge
collapsed leaving only one access point (that is also in jeopardy) to a water treatment plant that serves a11 of
Lamar County and a portion of Red River County. The bridge is already designed and on plans and
specifications. The existiag three barrel steel culverts on the main access road is severely deteriorated and
in danger of collapsing. A new culvert is also proposed in this secondary project, also providing access to
the water plant. The new cuivert would replace an existing culvert that is badly deteriorated.
We also understand that this application may be considered for Economic stimelus funds cwrently being developed
by Congress. The stimulus funding would give precedence to projects that can be under construction as rapidly as
possible. T'he primary project outlined herein can be underway very expeditiously for the following reasons:
• The waterlines proposed are scheduled to replace old cast iron and asbestos cement lines, without picking
up any additional services. For this reason we believe the project should be Categorically Excluded from
environmental requirements.
• T'he lines are currently within City Right-of-Ways, and would not require easements.
• The waterlines proposed were previously identified in the City long-range plan; these lines are years 2010
through 2018 (year 2008 is complete and year 2009 is currently underway). These lines have also been
approved for recon 'on by Council vote.
T'hank you,
Kevin Carruth
City Manager
P.O. BOX 9037 • PARIS, TEXAS 75461-8037 •(903) 785-7511 • FAX (903) 785-8519
. 000226
Texas Water Development Board
SFY 2010 DWSRF IUP Solicitation Packet
Project Information Form
In order to be considered for rating and inclusion in the SFY 2010 DWSRF IUP, all items on this form are required to be
filled out. Incomplete forms may prevent projects from being rated.
For questions, contact: Suzanne Lucignani 512-463-6277 suzanne.lucignani@twdb.state.tx.us
George Jones 512-463-6284 george.jones@twdb.state.tx.us
Section -A • •
Name of Entity
(City, Town, County, District, PWS, WSC, etc.)
County
City of Paris
Lamar
PWS ID No.
CCN Na
1390002
10480
Entity ContaCt Information
Engineering Firm Contact Information
(Seal of registered Professional Englneer required on Page 3.)
Name af Firm
Hayter Engineering, Inc.
Contact Person
Shawn Napier, P.E.
Contact Person
Thomas L. Pruitt, P.E.
Title
City Engineer
Title
Project Engineer
Mailing
Address
P.O. Box 9037
Paris, TX 75461
Mailing
Address
4445 SE Loop 286
Paris, TX 75460
Phone No.
903-784-9292
Phone No.
903-785-0303
Fax Number
903-784-1798
Fax Number
903-785-0308
Email Address
snapier@paristexas.gov
Email Address
Tpruitt@hayterengineeringinc.com
Section A INFORMATION . . .p . . . applicable, .
• For an incorporated entity (i.e., a city or town), indicate the number of people who reside within the territorial boundaries of, or
receive wholesale or retail water service from, the entity based on the most recent decennial US Census.
• For an unincorporated entity (i.e., a county, district, river authority, system, or corporation), indicate the number of people who
reside within the territorial boundaries of, or receive wholesale or retail water service from, the entity based on the most recent
decennial US Census. You must provide a table that 1) identifies the number of household connections within each applicable
census boundary* that covers your service area and 2) prorates the population accordingly. The map of the service area must
by overlaid by a map of the census boundary(ies) identified in the table.
* Please utilize the smallest geographic type (e.g., census tract, block group, block) for which the most recent decennial US Census
data is available.
Population Served
27,438
Number of Household Gonnections
10325
Section REFINANCING
DWSRF funds may be used to refinance completed projects only. See the Guidelines for additional information.
Yes
No
Will DWSRF funds be used to refinance existing debt that is related to this project and
J
was received from a source other than the TWDB?
Form DW-007 (10/08) 000227
Texas Water Development Board
SFY 2010 DWSRF IUP Solicitation Packet
Project Information Form
Name of Entity: City of Paris PWS ID No.: 1390002
Section PROJECT . •
The principaf project consists of one or more canstruction projects that are intended to adtlress specific system conditions. The cost
of the principal project must be greater than 50% of the cost of all projects inGuded on the Project Information Form (see Section 7
for listing additional projects). If an entity has multiple principal projects, please submit individual forms for each-principal project.
Provide a brief description of the principal project and how it will address the items in Section 6 to which'you respond
"Yes."
Current Health and Compliance Factor and/or
MCL Violations and Physical Deficiencies
Proposed Project Solutions
Cost Category
(See Guidelines.)
1. Documented outages
Replace old CI lines
B
2. Disinfection
Replacing old CI lines and looping
B
5. a. & b. Low system pressure
Replace old CI lines with larger
diameter lines
B
6. Water loss
Replace old CI lines
B
Water tower deteriorated
Repair and repaint elevated tank
D
Section RATING • . . pertain only . the . project.
Total Storage Capacity (in gallons) Total Production Capacity (MGD)
Please attach any documentation that supports the responses to the following questions. (Refer to
TCEQ notice of violation letter, if applicable.)
Yes
No
1.
Has your system experienced documented autages in the water distribution system?
,I
2.
Does the system lack adequate disinfection?
~
3.
Is the system's documented water production capability less than 85% of the minimum required by
TCEQ?
~
4.
Is the system's documented treated water storage capacity less than 85% of the minimum required by
TCEQ (including total storage, elevated storage, andlor pressure tank)?
J
5.
Has the system experienced documented instances of water distribution pressures:
Yes
No
a.
less than 20 PSI?
~
b.
less than 35 PSI?
~
6.
Is the system experiencing documented water distribution losses of greater than 25%?
~
7.
Has your system experienced documented instances of water contaminants exceeding the primary or
secondary maximum contaminant level (MCL)?
J
Benefits to Other Public Water Systems - Consolidation Projects
Yes
No
8.
Will the proposed principal project benefit any other public water systems (i.e., one you are currently
serving or propose to serve)?
• If you answer "Yes," you must also submit the Consolidation Project Worksheet (DW-009) for
each water system that will benefit from this project.
• If you answer "No," skip to Section 7.
J
Name of Public Water System
Currently Served
Propose to Serve*
that Will Benefit from This Project
PWS ID No.
Yes
No
Yes
No
* You must attach written documentation of the agreement with the PWS that you propose to serve.
Form DW-007 (10/08) 000228 2
Texas Water Development Board
SFY 2010 DWSRF IUP Solicitation Packet
Project Information Form
Section ADDITIONAL PROJECT . .
Additional projects which are vital to the integrity of the system may be eligible to receive funding, as long as their costs represent
50% or less of the total project costs. The priority list is ranked based on the principal project only, not the additional projects.
Additional projects are optional.
Provide a brief description of any additional project and how it will address any problems or needs of your water system(s)
that are not identified in Sections 5 and 6.
Additional Project
Problem/Need Addressed
Replace bridge and culvert on road from City to WTP.
Access to the WTP is vital to the operation of this WTP.
Section ATED COSTS
Cost Category
Principal Project
Cost
Additional
Project Cost
Total
Cost
1.
Treatment
$432,690.00
$432,690.00
2.
Transmission and Distribution
$6,720,790.66
$6,720,790.66
3.
Source
4.
Storage
$723,515.63
$723,515.63
5.
Purchase of System
6.
Restructuring
7.
Land Acquisition
8.
Source Water Protection Project
9.
Engineering
$625,545.00
$21,600.00
$647,145.00
10.
General, Legal, Financial
$59,000.00
$59,000.00
11.
Contingency
$838,196.00
$64,900.00
$903,096.00
12.
Other (Describe cost.)
600
00
8
705
00
$261
additional engineering
$253,105.00
.
$
,
,
.
13.
Subtotal (Add lines 1-12.)
$9,220,152.29
$527,790.00
$9,747,942.29
14.
Financing from Local Funds
$0.00
15.
Financing from Other Sources
$0.00
16.
Subtotal, SRF-Funded Amount (Subtract lines 14 and 15 from line 13.)
$9,747,942.29
17.
TWDB Loan Origination Fee (Calculate 2.25% of line 16.)
$219,328.70
18.
Grand Total (Add lines 16 and 17.)
$9,967,270.99
19.
Requested Loan Amount (Round up line 18 to the nearest $5,000.)
$9,970,000
Section 0 • D SIGNATURE
Printed Name and Title of Entity's Authorized Representative
T@I2pIlOt1
Seal of Registered Professional Engineer Certifying
@ NO.
Estimated Costs (Required if Requested Loan Amount
exceeds $100,000.)
903-784-
Shawn Napier, P.E., City Engineer
9292
Signature of Authorized Representative
Date
(mmldd/yy
.
yy)
Form DW-007 (10/08) 6" 00022J
Texas Water Development Board
FY 2008 DWSRF IUP Solicitation Packet
Guidelines on Conducting Surveys
for the Disadvantaged Communities Program
01 /22/20
09
'w` QU~2.lU
Form SRF-008a (9/08)
j
~
~ ° C I [1~'r( O ~ ~ P ~ ~ ..F
~ va~a~w~eawi.~.wH.\v~,+lwR~
Dear Reviewer,
Transmitted herewith please find an application from the City of Paris for inclusion on the 2010 CWSRF
NP. We appreciate the opportunity working with the Texas Water Development Board.
The tmprovements outlined herein include five major sewer system improvement projects, treatment,
collection system rehabilitation, infiltration and inflow control, major sewer rehabilitation, and planning.
These projects will enhance the ability of the City to collect and treat the wastewater for the following
reasons:
• The wastewater treatment plant existing grit removal system is in need of replacement/expansion.
The system currently passes excessive amounts of grit that is now being noticed in aeration and
digestion systems at the plant, and is suspected to be seriously degrading other components of the
plant as a whole. A separate grit removal system is also planned at the flow equalization basin
(FEB).
• The old clay tile lines are especially troublesome and maintenance intensive due to cracks and
leaking joints. The sewer lines depicted on the included map, and also tabulated, have been
identified as necessary replacements in our 10-year capitol improvement plan, of which we are
currently in our second year. We feel that through this loan, we could see a substantial savings to
our citizens through inflation alone, not to mention the reduction in maintenance needed or
excessive additional wear and tear on equipment.
• Not only are the old lines are also sources of heary maintenance, but our wastewater treatment
plant would like improve performance through the reduction in inflow and infiltration (I&I).
• The City of Paris is also currently undertaking a plan to rehabilitate its wastewater treatment plant
facility. The plan will explore options of rehabilitation versus construction of an entirely new
plant, and will be Phase II of two parts. We are cunently working on Phase I of the plan.
We also understand that this application may be considered for Economic stimulus funds currently being
developed by Congress. The stimulus funding would give precedence to projects that can be under
construction as rapidly as possible. The primary project outlined herein can be underway very
expeditiously for the following reasons:
• The sewer lines proposed are scheduled to replace clay tile lines, without picking up any
additional services. For this reason we believe the project should be Categorically Excluded from
environmental requirements.
• The lines are cunently within City Right-of-Ways, and would not require easements.
• The sewer lines proposed were previously identified in the City long-range plan; these lines are
years 2010 through 2018 (year 2008 is complete and year 2009 is currently underway). These
lines have also been approved for reconstruction by Council vote.
yo ,
~
E . E. City Engineer / Director of Public Works
4Shawn ier, P
City of Paris
P.O. BOX 9037 • PARIS, TEXAS 75461-9037 9 (903) 785-7511 • FAX (903) 785-9579
•M 000231
Texas Water Development Board
SFY 2010 CWSRF IUP Solicitation Packet
Project Information Form
In order to be considered for rating and inclusion in the SFY 2010 CWSRF IUP, all items on this form are required to be
filled out. Incomplete forms may prevent projects from being rated.
For questions, contact: Suzanne Lucignani 512-463-6277 suzanne.lucignani@finrdb.state.tx.us
George Jones 512-463-6284 george.jones@twdb.state.tx.us
Section A •
Name of Entity
(City, Town, County, District, Authority, System, Corporation, etc.)
County
City of Paris
Lamar
Contact Information
Entit
Engineering Firm Contactlnformation
y
Name of Firm
Hayter Engineering, Inc.
Contact Person
Shawn Napier, P.E.
Contact Person
Thomas L. Pruitt, P.E.
Title
City Engineer, Utilities Director
Title
Project Engineer
Mailing
Address
P.O. Box 9037
Paris, TX 75461
Mailing
Address
4445 SE Loop 286
Paris, TX 75460
Phone No.
903-784-9292
Phone No.
903-785-0303
Fax Number
903-784-1798
Fax Number
903-785-0308
Email Address
snapier@paristexas.gov
Email Address
Tpruitt@hayterengineeringinc.com
For an incorporated entity (i.e., a city or town), indicate the number of people who reside within the territorial boundaries of, or
receive wholesale or retail water service from, the entity based on the most recent decennial US Census.
For an unincorporated entity (i.e., a county, district, river authority, system, or corporation), indicate the number of people who
reside within the territorial boundaries of, or receive wholesale or retail water service from, the entity based on the most recent
decennial US Census. You must provide a table that 1) identifies the number of household connections within each applicable
census boundary" that covers your service area and 2) prorates the population and per capita income accordingly. The map of
the service area must by overlaid by a map of the census boundary(ies) identified in the table.
" Please utilize the smallest geographic type (e.g., census tract, block group, block) for which the most recent decennial US Census
data is available.
Population Served 27,438 Annual Per Capita Income I 17,137 I
( Number of Household Connections I 10,325 I 1
Sectio REFINANCING . amount . . •
CWSRF funds may be used to refinance completed projects only. See the Guidelines for additional information.
Yes
No
Will CWSRF funds be used to refinance existing debt that is related to this project and
~
was received from a source other than the TWDB?
Form CW-007 (10/08) 000232
Texas Water Development Board
SFY 2010 CWSRF IUP Solicitation Packet
Project Information Form
Name of Entity: City of Paris
The principal project consists of one or more construction projects that are intended to address specific system conditions. The cost
of the principal project must be greater than' 50% af the cost af all projects included on the Project I'nformation Form (see Section 9
for listing additional projects). If an entity has multiple principal projects, please submit individual forms for each principal project.
Provide a brief description of the Principal Project including any proposed innovative or alternative technology to be used.
If the project is a regional project, include all the names of the communities involved or WWTP service areas altered. Add
additional sheets as necessary. If the project is a nonpoint source pollution control project, please identify the water body
that will benefit from the project.
Funds will be utilized for five (5) major sewer system projects to include:
1) Treatment - grit removal at the WWTP and equalization basin.
2) Phase II Master Planning. Planning for major improvements/new VWVTP.
3) Rehabilitation of 39 sewer lines in town.
4) Rehabilitation/replacement of 17 manholes, not on above lines.
5) Replace/rehabilitate four (4) lift stations.
This work will greatly increase efficiency and reduce future maintenance costs.
Section •A PROJECT
Check the ONE category that best describes the principal project.
A.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
The permitted capaciry of a WWTP is being expanded or additional facilities are needed for more stringent limits.
B.
Sludge Treatment Capacity Expansion
The project is primarily to expand the solids treatment and handling portion of a VWVfP.
C.
Facilities Rehabilitation
The project is primarily to rehabilitate equipment (permit change not tequired) at an existing WW'TP, both wet and
dry processes, or rehabilitate/replace an existing lift station (pecmit change not required).
D.
Collection System Rehabilitation/Overflow Control
The project is primarily to manage excessive inflow/infiltration flows or exriltration and includes anyof the
J
following: collection system rehabilitation, relief lines, expansion of lift stations, construction of new lift stations,
and expansion of the hydraulic capacity at a VW1ffP.
E.
Unserved Area
Projects that involve extending service to populated areas of an existing developed community that are not served
by a centralized collection system. Project primarily involves collector sewers as opposed to trunk sewers.
• For an'isolated community that has no centralized system, a principal project may include the cost of the
collection system, transmission lines, and construction of a VWVfP.
• Far an area adjacent to an existing community with centralized wastewater collection and treatment
service, the principal project may include the cost of the construction of the collection system and the
transmission lines required to convey flow to treatment.
F.
Trunk Sewer, Diversion
Projects where all or a portion of flow is diverted from an existing #acility to another existing or new VWVfP. The
project could include diversion sewers, lift stations, and expansions or construction of a new WWTP. In these
cases, the project will be scored on the basis of the WWTP that is being removed or relieved of flow.
G.
Trunk Sewer, Developing Area
Projects primarily involve construction of trunk lines and tift stations to extend service to developing areas of a
community.
H.
Reuse
Projects to construct facilities to enable reuse of reclaimed wastewater for irrigation or other purposes.
1.
Nonpoint Source Pallution Control/Estuary Management Project
A project for managing nonpoint source pollution that is in accordance with the State of Texas 319 plan (Nonpoint
Source Management Plan) or the State of Texas 320 plan (Estuary Management Plan).
J.
Other (Please describe below.)
Form CW-007 (10/08) ~(U) 2 3 3 2
Texas Water Development Board
SFY 2010 CWSRF IUP Solicitation Packet
Project Information Form
Name of Entity: City of Paris
Section RATING • - . . pertain only . - . project.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Control and Estuary Management projects may skip to Section 9.
A.
Enforcement Action
Yes
No
Is the work required by a schedule imposed by court order, EPA administrative order, or TCEQ
"
J
attach a copy of the order.
enforcement order? If "Yes,
B.
Unserved Area
Yes
No
1. Does your principal project involve extending service (centralized or altemative system) to
populated areas of an existing developed community that are not served by a centralized
~
colfection system?
2. Has a public health official found that a nuisance dangerous to public health and safety
exists resulting from water supply and sanitation problems in the area to be served by the
~
proposed project? If "Yes," attach a letter from TCEQ or a Public Health Official to
document the nuisance.
C.
Innovative and Alternative
Yes
No
Will the principal project include innovative or alternative types of collection or treatment
technology as defined below?
• Alternative Technology (TAC Sec. 375.2(4))
Proven wastewater management techniques which provide for the reclaiming and reuse of
water, productively recycle wastewater constituents, or recover energy. Specifically,
alternative technology includes: land application of effluent and sludge, aquifer recharge,
aquaculture, direct reuse, horticulture, revegetatian of disturbed land, containment ponds,
J
sludge composting and drying prior to land application, self-sustaining incineration,
methane recovery, individual and onsite systems, and small diame#er pressure and
vacuum sewers and small diameter gravity sewers carrying partially or fully treated
wastewater.
• Innovative Technology (TAC Sec. 375.2(47))
Nonconventional methods of treatment such as rock reed, root zone, ponding, irrigation, or
other technologies which represent a significant advance in the state of the art.
D.
More Stringent Effluent Limits
Yes
No
Does the principal project involve more stringent permit limitations? If "Yes," attach a copy of
~
your new discharge permit or a letter from TCEQ stating the new limits.
E.
Regi
onal Projects
Yes
No
1.
Does the principal project result in removing one or more existing WW'tPs from service,
J
thereby reducing the number of plant outfalls?
2.
Is the principal project a trunk sewer that will convey wastewater from a plant that will be
~
removed from service to an existing treatment plant?
3.
Is the principal project a trunk sewer to an existing or developing area that will convey
'
~
fP, thereby avoiding the construction of a separate
wastewater to an existing WW
treatment facility?
4.
Will the principal project expand an existing regional facility to receive flow from another
J
community rather than create or continue use of a separate wastewater treatment facility?
If "Yes" to ANY of the above questions, attach a map showing the existing service area along with the proposed expanded or
altered service areas resulting from this project.
F.
Implementation of Regional Plans
Yes
No
1.
Does the principal project implement a regional facility plan for water resources funding in
~
whole or in part by a grant from TWDB?
2.
Does the principal project implement a TCEQ regionalization or consolidation plan?
~l
3.
Does the principal project implement other plans developed by state regional entities
~
pursuant to legislative authority?
If "Yes" to ANY of the questions in
Section 7.F., list plan name and sponsor:
AND attach the plan's executive summary and any other material needed to show that the proposed principal project
implements the plan.
FOffll C.W-007 (10/08) w OPP231i 3
Texas Water Development Board
SFY 2010 CWSRF IUP Solicitation Packet
Project Information Form
Name of Entity: City of Paris
Section ASTEWATER TREA PARAMETERS
Does the principal project result in the abandonment or relieving of a VWVfP and diversion of flow to Yes No
another facility? If "Yes," complete Tables A and B. If "No," complete only Table A. ~
Provide data for the facility to be abandoned or relieved of flow, OR the plant serving the principal project.
TCEQ Permit #
10479-002
WWTP Name
City of Paris VWVTP
NPDES #
TX0027910
?
Yes
No
If "No," identify the
Hicks Creek to Pine Creek, Segment
No-Discharge Facility
~
Discharge Segment.
0202 of the Red River
Current Permit Limits
Proposed Permit Limits
Average Daily Flow
7.25 MGD
7.25 MGD
Peak 2-Hour Flow
17.34 MGD
17.34 MGD
CBOD/BOD
10 mg/I
10 mg/I
TSS
15 mg/I
15 mg/I
Chlorination
yes
yes
Nitrogen
2 mg/I NH3
2 mg/I NH3
Phosphorus
between 6 and 9
between 6 and 9
DO
minimum 6.0 mg/I
minimum 6.0 mg/I
Dechlorination
yes
yes
Status of Permit
Application
Active
Provide data for the facility to receive diverted flow.
r
TCEQ Permit #
Name
P
NPDES #
Yes
No
if "No," identify the
No-Discharge Facility?
Discharge Segment.
Current Permit Limits
Proposed Permit Limits
Average Daily Flow
Peak 2-Hourflow
CBOD/BOD
TSS
Chlorination
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
DO
Dechlorination
Status of Permit
Application
~
Form CW-007 (10/08) " 0 P (i 2 4
Texas Water Development Board
SFY 2010 CWSRF IUP Solicitation Packet
Project Information Form
Name of Entity: City of Paris
Additional projects may be eligible to receive funding, as long as their costs represent 50% or less af the total project costs. The
priority list is ranked based on the principal project only, not the additional projects. Additional projects can be from other service
areas within the community. Additional projects are optional. Provide a detailed description of any additional projects.
None
Start Date (mm/yyyy) 1 11 /2009
Completion Date (mm/yyyy) 1 11/2011
Section . COSTS
Cost Category
Principal Project
Cost
Additional Projects
Cost
Total
Cost
1.
Wastewater Treatment Plant
$2,037,407.00
$2,037,407.00
2.
Collection System Rehabilitation
$5,679,667.00
$5,679,667.00
3.
Infiltration & Inflow Control
$68,000.00
$68,000.00
4.
Major Sewer Rehabilitation
$468,838.00
$468,838.00
5.
Trunk Sewers
6.
New Collection System (Unserved Area)
7.
Nonpoint Source/Estuary Mgmt. Project
8.
Engineering
$630,000.00
$630,000.00
9.
General, Legal, Financial
$80,000.00
$80,000.00
10.
Contingency
$1,030,000.00
$1,030,000.00
11.
Other (Describe cost.)
$435
000
00
000
00
$435
other engineering
.
,
.
,
12.
Subtotal (Add lines 1-11.)
$10,348,912.00
$10,328,912.00
13.
Financing from Local Funds
$0.00
14.
Financing from Other Sources
$0.00
15.
Subtotal, SRF-Funded Amount (Subtract lines 13 and 14 from line 12.)
$10,348,912.00
16.
TWDB Loan Origination Fee (Calculate 1.85% of line 15.)
$191,454.87
17.
Grand Total (Add lines 15 and 16.)
$10,540,366.87
18.
Requested Loan Amount (Round up line 17 to the nearest $5,000.)
$10,545,000
Section A A • AND SIGNATURE
Printed Name and Title of Entity's Authorized Representative
Telephone No.
Shawn Napier, P.E. Public Utilities Director
903-784-9292
Signature of Authorized Representative
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01 /29/2009
Form CW-007 (10/08) " P, rl ® 2 G 5