2009-115-RES-Adopting a revised water conservation plan for the City of ParisRESOLUTIOIV NO. 2009-115
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS,
ADOPTING A REVISED WATER CONSERVATIOIV PLAN FOR THE CITY OF
PARIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 30, TEXAS
ADMIIVISTRATIVE CODE, CHAPTER 288, SUB-CHAPTERS A AND B;
MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE
SUBJECT; REPEALING ALL PRIOR WATER CONSERVATION PLANS IN
COIVFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING A SAVIIVGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, maintaining a clean, reliable supply of potable water is essential to the
health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the city of Paris; and,
WHEREAS, supplies of clean, potable water continue to diminish as a result of
increasing population demands, increased industrial demands, water pollution, and other
reasons; and,
WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature has recognized the need to preserve and
conserve the potable water supplies of the state of Texas by adopting omnibus,
comprehensive legislation intended to preserve, regulate, and enhance the water supplies
of the state of Texas; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris likewise recognizes the need to
maintain and preserve the City's supplies of potable water; and,
WHEREAS, in order to preserve the City's water supplies, comply with the
requirements of State law, and in the interest of preserving the health, safety, and welfare
of the citizens of the city of Paris, the City Council deems it necessary and appropriate to
adopt a revised Water Conservation Plan for the City of Paris;
NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PARIS, TEXAS:
Section 1. That the findings set out in the preamble to this resolution are hereby
in all things approved.
Section 2. That the City Council does hereby in all things approve and adopt a
Water Conservation Plan for the City of Paris, as the same is set out in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and for all purposes incorporated herein, and does hereby direct the City Manager
and the City staff to in all things implement the Water Conservation Plan approved herein.
Section 3. That, from and after the passage of this resolution, the Water
Conservation Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A shall be observed and followed by the City
in the utilization of the City's water supply sources.
Section 4. That all water conservation plans heretofore adopted by the City of
Paris shall be, and are hereby, in all things repealed and replaced by this Water
Conservation Plan.
Section 5. Should any paragraph, sentence, subdivision, clause, phrase, or section
of this resolution or the plan adopted herein be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional,
illegal, or in any way otherwise invalid, by a court or administrative body of appropriate
jurisdiction regarding same, such findings shall not affect the validity of this resolution or
the plan adopted herein, as a whole or any part or provision thereof, other than the part so
declared to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional.
Section 6. That this resolution shall be effective from and after its date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of November, 2009.
ATTEST:
\
~
nice Ellis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
W. Kent Mc y, C ty Attrney
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
FOR:
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
P.O. BOX 9037
PARIS, TEXAS 75461-9037
CCN No. 10480
PWS No. 1390002
AUGUST 2009
ExH1BtT A,
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
FOR THE
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
SUMMARY
The City of Paris currently serves a population over 26,000 residents
and is expected to grow approximately 34,000 residents by 2050 based on
projections provided by Texas Water Development Board planning data.
The current service area directly served by the City of Paris is 38.12 square
miles. In addition to the residents of Paris, the City also wholesales treated
water to two other water supplies: Lamar County and Marvin-Jennings-
Clardy Water Supplies.
Water is furnished by a single water treatment plant originally built
in 1967 and last expanded in 1995 to a current water capability of 36 million
gallons per day. All water is treated from two reservoirs: Pat Mayse Lake
with a maximum diversion of 55 million gallons per day and Lake Crook
with a maximum diversion of 10.7 million gallons per day. This total water
right diversion of 65.7 million gallons per day is expected to be more than
adequate to meet future growth in population and industry for both the City
and the county well into the 21St century.
This Water Conservation Plan has been developed to protect these
water resources and extend their useful life to insure a sufficient water
supply is available to provide for all anticipated, and even unexpected, water
dernands of the future. In order to implement the basic elements of this Plan,
it is necessary to examine current water use practices, educate the public
about water use reduction and/or efficient water usage patterns and establish
methodologies for achieving these goals. This Plan identifies several water
conservation goals and esplains those areas where potential water
conservation can be achieved.
Conservation can have the major benefit of reducing overall water
demand resulting in a delay of the need for expenditures for treatment plant
expansion or acquisition of additional raw water rights. Much of the
information contained herein is required by the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for Water Conservation Plans. Additional
information included is specific to the City of Paris water supply and
treatment system and local usage pattern and necessity.
Utilitv Sur-vev
The initial phase of developing a conservation plan is dependent on
tbe results of a utility survey. This survey is a comprehensive profile of
water usage patterns by customer type and covers a period of the previous
five years. Data from the survey was used in a calculating technical data for
determination of future water conservation goals.
2
Water Conservation Methods
The City of Paris Water Conser-vation Plan includes the following
conservation methods:
1. Public education;
2. Conservation oriented rate structure;
3. Universal metering, meter testing, repair and replacement,
identiication of illegal connections;
4. Leak detection and repair;
5. Water conserving landscaping (Xeriscaping);
6. Plumbing retrofit an-d new construction;
7. Recycling and reuse;
8. Water system auditing;
Each conservation method is described in the following subsections.
l. Public Education:
The success of any water conservation program is dependent upon an
informed public. Customers must have an awareness of the needs for water
conservation and have l:nowledge of how to contribute to the plan. The
public education program must provide information to as many users as
possible as an understandable and effective instrument. Components of the
program include items such as distribution of water conservation literature,
public service announcements, water conservation speakers at schools, and
service organizations and special events and promotions. Several fine water
conservation documents are available from the Texas Water Development
Board (TWDB) on water saving measures that can be used both inside and
outside the home, plumbing fixture retrofitting, xeriscaping and several
other conservation practices.
The City of Paris Utilities Department has obtained and distributed
these documents over the past few years to schools, civic groups and the
general public. The Utilities Department will continue to provide such
information on an on-going basis and attempt to reach as many customers as
possible to further increase public awareness of water conservation. The
Utilities Department is also very active in promoting public participation in
Water Utilities Awareness during National Drinking Water Week in 1VIay of
each year. National Drinl:ing Water Week offers tours of the treatment
plant, participation by schools and youth clubs, public service
announcements and Utilities personnel are guest speakers to schools, civic
graups and other meetings in promoting utilities awareness and
conservation. Water conservation literature can also be made available at
3
the Utilities Billing Office and an insert in the monthly bill can inform
customers of the availability of this information.
2. Conservation Oriented Rate Structure
The City of Paris charges a base rate for the first increment of usage
in cubic feet for all customers both residential and commercial based on
meter size. Charges for usage in excess of the base volume charge are at a
constant rate per 100 cubic feet. Increased usage does not result in a lower
rate char ;e therefore, excessive use is not encouraged. See Appendix A for
rate schedule.
3. Universal Metering, Meter Testing, Repair and Replacement:
All connections in the City of Paris are metered. The Billing Office
routinely sends a list of ineters to be replaced to the meter shop at Public
Works based on the age of the meter at the address. All new installations are
touch-read, automatic reading systems that eliminate the possibility for
human error caused by visually misreading the register. All meters repaired
are tested for accuracy before installation. All meters of size 3" and greater
are tested annually for accuracy. A meter is considered acceptable only if the
accuracy is within standards set forth by the American Water Worl:s
Association (AWWA) for the particular ineter type.
The Billing Office reads all meters on a monthly basis regardless of
whether the account is active or inactive. Illegal connections are quickly
identified by this measure and abandoned services with meters removed
periodically checked for illegal connections as well.
4. Leak Detection and Repair:
The City of Paris has a very progressive leak detection and repair
program. The Public Works Department actively seel:s out and repairs all
leal:s on a timely basis with larger leaks having priority for repair over
smaller leal:s. Leak reports are also turned in by Utilities, Meter Readers,
Sanitation, Engineering, Fire, Police, and all other departments in the City to
the Public Works Department for repair. Leal:s are also reported by the
public and other utility companies as well. Public Works investigates all
reports promptly and conducts repairs as soon as possible. Public Works
also maintains an on-call crew to repair leal:s and sewer stoppage on
weekends, holidays, and after hours. Several pressure monitoring devices
are located at various points throughout the distribution system and are
connected to the SCADA system at various lift stations. A leak near any of
these pressure monitors triggers an alarm at the Water Treatment Plant and
Public Works is notified of a probable leak in the area.
5. Water Conserving Landscaping:
The Utilities Department has distributed TWDB information an
proper lawn watering and xeriscaping for many years and will continue to
furnish this information in the future as part of our public education
program. Xeriscaping (using drought-tolerant, low water deenand
landscapes) has become more popular in recent years with homeowners
learning that such plants not only require less maintenance but result in a
cost savings on water utility bills as well. Other water saving measures such
4
as mulching and watering at the proper times of the day also reduce costs.
There are measures easily performed by any homeowner and the City of
Paris will seek new ways to bring these vaiuable ~vater saving tips to the
customers.
6. Plumbing Retrofit:
Subchapter G. (Water Saving Performance Standards) of Chapter
290 of Title 30 of the Texas Administrative Code establishes water efficiency
standards for faucets, lavatories, shower beads, drink-ing water fountains,
toilets and other plumbing fixtures. No person may selt, offer for sale,
distribute or import into the state of Texas any fixture not meeting these
standards. No state licensed plumber may install any fixture not meeting
these standards. The City of Paris Building Inspector strictly enforces the
state law concerning these water saving fixtures for all new installations with
the City. Additionally, the Building Inspector, as well as most licensed
plumbers worl:ing in the City, routinely attends periodic workshops
informing them of new fixtures meeting the standard added to the list and
the de-listing of those that may no longer qualify.
7. Recycling and Reuse:
Through the Industrial Pretreatment Program, the City of Paris
works with large high water demand industries to find ways to reduce water
use and corresponding wastewater discharge through various Pollution
Prevention (P2) activities. Most industries with cooling towers have installed
closed-loop systems resulting in no wastewater discharge and only require
make-up water lost to evaporation. This one activity of installing closed-loop
systems (recycling) has resulted in a dramatic decrease in water demand for
these larbe users. This is only one example of many water saving measures
implemented by the larger users. These types of activities will continue and
further options for recycle and reuse will be pursued.
Many cities currently reduce municipal water demand by reuse af
treated wastewater effluent for irrigation of city parks and other facilities.
Due to location of the City of Paris Wastewater Treatment Plant (6 miles
north of the City), it is not.currently economically feasible to consider reuse
of effluent for municipal purposes. Effluent is reused however, for irribation
of agricultural land by a state-approved diversion permit. The Wastewater
Treatment Plant also uses treated effluent as plant wash down water thus
reducing the demand for potable water for this purpose.
The Water Treatment Plant practices recycle and reuse by returning
filter backwash water for reprocessing. This water is metered and returned
to the head of the plant and mixed with raw water for treatment.
8. Water Use Auditing:
The City of Paris Utilities Department receives monthly reports of
water sales volumes from the Billing Office. These volumes are compared to
metered raw and treated water volumes to track lost or unaccounted for
water. This is the initial phase of early identifieation of lost water and
corrective measures are pursued accordingly. Water sales are further
tracked by user type as residential, commercial, industrial and wholesale as
5
part of the annual Surface Water Use Report sent to the TCEQ and TWDB.
A comprehensive water use audit was performed by private consultants in
2003 and the last audit was performed July 7, 2009 by the City of Paris
Utilities Dept. Comprehensive audits are the required every five years
thereafter.
Other ProQrams
1. Emergency Water Management and Drought Contingency Plan:
The Utilities Department has maintained a plan far emergency water
management for disasters, power outages and other disruptions of service for
the past few years. This plan has been updated periodically as needed. A
comprehensive Drought Contingency Plan has recently been updated in
accordance with TCEQ guidelines for such plans.
2. Pat Mayse Lake is a federally owned reservoir under the jurisdiction of
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tulsa District. Pat Mayse Lake is
included in their drought contingency plan for the Lower Red River Basin.
3. Relationship to Wholesale Water Customers:
Chapter 288 (Water Conservation Plans Guidelines and
Requirements) of Title 30 of the Texas Administrative Code requires all
wholesale water contracts entered into or renewed by the City must include a
provision that the wholesale customer must adopt a conservation plan in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 288 of Title 30. This clause must
be included in the water contracts of Lamar County and Marvin-Jennings-
Ciardy upon renewal or extension and must be included in any new contract
for wholesale water entered into with the City of Paris. Furthermore, any
customer purchasing wholesale water from the City of Paris who further
wholesales water to another customer must require all successive wholesale
customers to adopt a conservation plan in accordance with Chapter 288.
4. Coordination with Regional Water Planning Groups:
The service area of the City of Paris is located within the Northeast
Texas Region D Water Planning Group and the City of Paris shall provide a
copy of this plan to the Northeast Texas Region D Water Planning Group.
Water Conservation Goals for Estimation of Potential
Reduction in Per Capita Water L1se throuah the Year 2050
The following tables for potential reduction in per capita water use
were initially calculated in 1999 for the original adoption of the Water
Conservation Plan in 2000. The Utility Survey form and instructions were
provided by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for
municipal water conservation planning through the year 2050.
C)
The conservation measures establish a bottom range or "most likely"
real world potential conservation scenario and an upper ran ;e or
"advanced" scenario that assumes ideal situations representing a maximum
achievable conservation savings. A range of potential savings is deterraiined
for each of the following conservation measures:
1. Reducing unaccounted-for water uses;
2. Reducing indoor water use due to `vater-conserving ptunibinn
fiatures;
3. Reducing seasonal water use;
4. Reducing ~~vater use tbrough public education programs;
5. Reducing dry -year irrigation water use.
1. Reducing Unaccounted-for Water tises:
The TCEQ considers unaccounted-for water uses (loss) 15% or less
acceptable for communities serving over 5,000 people. Losses above 15%
provide a conservation potential with greater losses providing a greater
potential. The bottom of the range for technical potential savings is zero.
Calculation of the top of the range is determined by the following table:
Unaccounted -for uses = 15.9°/o
Dry-year per capita water use = 208.1 gallons per capita per day (gpcd)
Potential for reduction in unaccounted -for use =
(208.1 gpcd X 15.9%) -(208.1 gpcd X 15%) = 33.09-31.22 = 1.87 gpcd
Technical Potential Savings Range - 0 to 1.87 gpcd
II. Reducing Indoor Water Use due to Water-Conserving Plumbing Fixtures:
The TCEQ uses 20.5 gpcd as the most reliable fgure to represent the
"most likely" conservation scenario. This figure is based upon the estimate
that by 2050, 90% of pre-1990 homes, and all new homes will have been
equipped with water conserving fixtures.
The figure 21.7 gpcd is used as the "advanced" conservation scenario
and is an estimate of the average savings thaf would result from homes
equipped exclusively with water-conserving plumbing fixtures. ''his figure is
considered "advanced" because in a typical city, 100% of homes would not
be exclusively equipped with water-conserving fixtures. Results of TCEQ
data yield the following estimations:
"Most Likely" Savinbs by 2050 = 20.5 gpcd
"Advanced" Savings by 2050 = 21.7 apcd
Technical Potential Savings Ran
= 20-5 to 21.7 gpcd
7
III. Reducing Seasonal Water Use:
The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) has calculated
seasonal use as a percentage of average annual per capita use for East Texas
(20%), West Texas (25%) and a statewide average of ?2.5°/o. Seasonal use is
calculated by multiplying the average annual gpcd for each water system by
the appropriate percentage. The technical potential for reduction uses 7%
for the "most likely" scenario and 20% for the "advanced scenario. Below is
the resulting calculation:
Annual average per capita use for Paris water system = 188.7 gpcd
Geographical location = East Texas
Seasonal use =(188.7 X 20%) = 37.74 gpcd
Potential reduction in seasonal use (Most Likely scenario) _(37.74 X 7%) = 2.64
gpcd
Potential reduction in seasonal use (Advanced scenario) _(37.74 X 20%) = 7.55
bPcd
Technical Potential Savings Range = 2.64 to 7.55 gpcd
IV. Reducing Water Use through Public Education Programs:
The technical potential for water conservation through public
education programs is estimated to be from 2% of the average annual per
capita use (most likely) to 5% (advanced) according to the Water
Conservation Guidebook published in 1993 by the American Water Worl:s
Association. Below is the resulting calculation:
Average annual per capita use for Paris water system = 188.7 gpcd
Potential reduction in water use (Most Likely scenario) _(158.7 X 2%) = 3.77 gpcd
Potential reduction in water use (Advanced scenario) _(188.7 X5%) = 9.44 gpcd
Technical Potential Savings Range = 3.77 to 9.44
V. Reducing Dry-Year Irrigation Water Use:
The TCEQ and TWDB have estimated that the potential for reducing
dry-year irrigation is between 10.5% (Most likely) to 20% (Advanced) of the
dry-year water demand in gpcd. These savings result from xeriscaping
(using drought-tolerant, low water demand landscapes) and decreasing
watering of tradition landscaping by using efficient watering methods.
Below is the resulting calculation for Paris:
8
Paris dry-year demand = 208.1 gpcd
Paris Average demand = 188.7 gpcd
Dry-year irrigation use = dry-year demand - average demand = 208.1-188.7 = 19.4
gpcd
Potential reduction in water use (Most Likely scenario) _(19.4 X 10.5%) = 2.04 gpcd
Potential reduction in water use (Advanced scenario) _(19.4 X 20%) = 3.88 gpcd
Technical Potential Savings Range = 2.04 to 3.88
VI. Summation:
Calculation of the Total Technical Potential for reducing municipal
per capita water use is determined by adding the individual technical
potential amounts in item5 1 through V above. The following table is a
summary of these calculations for the CiTy of Paris water system:
Conservation Measure
Calculation Procedure
Results
Reducing unaccounted-
(Dry-year demand) X
to7 gpcd
for uses
(Unacc.-for percentage
L
if over 15%, minus
15%
Reducing indoor water
20.5 gpcd (Most likely)
20.5 to 21.7 gpcd
use due to water-efficient
to 21.7 gpcd (Advanced)
plumbing fixtures
as determined by the
TCEQ
Reducing seasonal water
Seasonal use (Avg. use X
2.64 to 7.~~ gpcd
use
20%) X 7% and 20%
Reducing water use
Average use X 2°o and
3.77 to 9.44 gpcd
through public education
5%
I
ro6ram
Reducing dry-year
Dry-year irrigation use
2.04 to 3.88 gpcd
irrigation use
(Dry-year demand -
Avg.
I
Use) X 10.5% and 20%
Total Technical Savings
~ 2895 to 44.44 gpcd
Potential
To determine the long-term planning goal, th.ese totals are subtracted
from the drv-vear water demand (2081 gpcd for Paris in 2000, year of initial
adoption of Water Conservation Plan).
Long-term planning goal =(Dr-y-year demand) minus (Total Technical
9
Potential)
= 208.1 gpcd - 28.95 gpcd = 179.15 gpcd ("Most Likely" conse~~ation
scenario)
= 2081 gpcd - 44.44 gpcd = 163.66 gpcd ("Advanced" conservation scenario)
LonQ-term plannin
;oal for municipal water use = 179.15 to 163.66 gpcd
These goals are based on a potential reduction in total municipal
gallons per capita per day demand by the year 2050. Some of these
conservation measures, such as retrofitting of water-conservation plumbing
fixtures, will not be realized in the early years of the goal but wili see result in
increasing benefit as we approach the year 2050 when older homes are re-
plumbed and future new homes constructed. A tentative schedule to achieve
100% of the goal by the year 2050 would be 10% by 2010, 17.5% by 2015,
25% by 2020, 37.5% by 2025, 50% by 2030, 62.5% by 2035, 75% by 2040,
87.5% by 2045 and 100% by 2050.
Prepared by: City of Paris Environmental Services Division, August, 2009
10
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
UTILITY PROFILE & WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
REQUIREMENTS
TCEQ FOR MUNICIPAL WATER USE BY PUBLIC WATER
SUPPLIERS
This form is provided to assist entities in water conservation plan development for municipal water use by a retail
public water supplier. Information from this form should be included within a water conservation plan for municipal
use. Ifyou need assistance in completing this form or in developing your plan, please contact the conservation staffo
the Resource Protection Team in the Water Su 1 Division at (5 12) 239-4691.
Name of Entity:
Address & Zip:
Telephone Number:
Form Completed By:
Title:
Signature
903 1 784-2464
Rodney L. Brashier
Fax: ( 903 ) 784-4809
Environmental Services Supervisor
A Date:
Name and Phone Number of Person/Dep tment responsible for implementing a
waterconservation program: City of Paris Utilities Dept (903) 784-2464
UTILITY PROFILE
1. POPULATION AND CUSTOMER DATA
A. Population and Service Area Data
1.
~
3.
TCE-Q-10218 (Rev. 11-5-04)
City of Paris
P.O. Box 9037, Paris, TX 75461-9037
Attach a copy of your service-area map and, if applicable, a copy of your
Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN).
Service area size (square miles):
38.12
Current population of service area:
27,450
Pcge 1 of 11
4. Current population served:
a. water 27,420
b. wastewater ?4, nn S
5. Population served by water utility 6.
for the previous five years:
Year
?(1O5
2006
2007
2008
2009
Population
?F,, 49~
26,612
26,732
96,852
27,450
Projected population for
service area in the following,
decades:
Year Population
2010 2R _ n48_
2020 30,190
2030 32,192
2040 34,194
2050 34,194
7. List source/method for the calculation of current and projected population:
2009 Estimate• Average of 2008 actual and 2010 nroiected.
2005 through 2008: From City of Paris Finance Dept. records.
2010 thrntt h2n50 t].LD.lpCtinnc are frnm TW11R cTahcita
noDUlation proiectons.
B. Active Connections
l. Current number of active connections. Check whether multi-family service is
counted as Residential or Commercial x
Treated water users: Metered Not-metered Total
Residential 9,067 0 9,067
Commercial 1,858 0 1,858
Industrial 22 0 22
Other S 0 -5----
TCEQ-10218 (Rev. 11-5-04) Page 2 0` 11
List the net number of new connections per year for most recent three years:
Year ?nnR ?nn7 ?nM
Residential -260 +105 +180
Commercial -10 -5 +248
Industrial 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0
C. High Volume Customers
List annual water use for the five hibhest volume customers
(indicate if tYeated or raw wateY delivery)
Customer Use (1,OOOgaI./yr.) Treated/Raw Water
(l) Campbell Soup 1,097,246 Treated
Lamar Power
(2) Partners 1,065,165 Raw
(3) T ^m^r ('rnintv WSD 11051,446 Traatgd
(4) Direct Energy 170,024 Treated
(5) Kimberly-Clark 119,267 Treated
II. WATER USE DATA FOR SERVICE AREA
A. Water Accounting Data
l. Amount of water use for previous five years (in 1,000 gal.):
Please indicate:
Diverted Water
24, 709, 343
Treated Water
19,999, 114
Year 2008
2007
2006 2005
2004
Januarti 364,793
397,033
371,405 300,424
352,166
FebT'U3n' E 2, 597
'i S7_ 4
4 q 7 R
March 351,016
432,230
332,445 285,746
317,976
TCEQ-10218 (Rev. 11-5-04) Page 3 of 11
April
316,688
341,930
427,706
284,669
321,639
May
369,417
412,250
473,126
376,747
416,419
.Tune
424,291
402,17?
546,?98
.487,088-
3._91~r989
luly
553,874
451,941
655,618
511,045
501,575
August
536,066
560,515
686,320
534,783
519,320
September
399,37
485,760
598,390
502,00.8
492,104
October
410,256
470,575
397,411
445,510
428,485
November
366 887
500
320
395
38.51-4-Q7-
3-59,832
December
334. 199
,
a7 , 224
316• 626
408,688
363,826
Total ~ 7 ,-4-"-,9 ! 994,454 _ 4n_n, n51. 4, 724, 1R3- 4, 793, h
Indicate how the above fibures were determined (e.g., from a master meter located at the point
of a diversion from the source or located at a point where raw water enters the treatment plant,
or from water sales).
2.
Amount of water (in 1,000 Qallons) delivered (sold)
as recorded by the
following, account types for the past five years.
Year
Residential Commercial Industrial Wholesale
Other Total Sold
2008
Q7L ~4(,_ 195 55 4,R1 _(1 F+29
4R1
-n---- 4tiA45~3
2007
,
476,083 135,738 2,810,480 973,327
0_ 4.,595.~627
2006
587.397 372.327 2 610.134 1,156.130
0 4 725.988
2005
594,704 374,811 2,132,013 1,174,557
0 4,276,086
2004
530,585 354,060 2,460,736 1,038,871
0 4,384,251
3
List previous five years records for water loss (the difference between water
.
diverted (or treated) and water delivered (or sold))
Year Amount (yal.) %
2002 ~ql 7~Ei,47? C)..2
2007 398,826,555 8•0
2006 674,063,064 12.5
2495._ 50.8,027_,09- 1 c1 _6
2004 408,944,598 _ 8•5
TCcQ-10218 ~Rev. 11-5-04) Page 4 of 11
4
III
B.
Municipal water use for previous five years:
Year Population
2008 26,852
2007 26,732
2.0.06 26,612
2005 26,493
2004 2.6T3;/i-
Total Water Diverted or
Pumped for Treatment (1,000 gal.)
3,672,294
3,757,591
4, 085 072
3,727,613
i
~T-,3, 09
Projected Water Demands
If applicable, attach projected water supply demands for the neat ten years usinb
information such as population trezids, historical water use, and economic growth in
the service area over the next ten years and any addiUonal water supply requirement
Irom sucli growth..
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM I)ATA
A. Water Supply Sources
List all current water supply sources and the amounts authorized with each:
Source
Amount Authorized
61.610
12,000
acre-feet
acre-feet
acre-feet
acre-feet
1. Design daily capacity of system: 36 MGD
2. Storage Capacity: Elevated 4 MGD, Ground 10. 5 MGD
3. If surface water, do you recycle filter backwash to the head of the plant?
Yes X No . If yes, approxirr,ately 0.9 MGD.
4. Please attach a description of the water system. Include the number of
treatment plants, wells, and storaQe tanl:s. If possible, include a sketch of the
system layout.
TCE,Q-10218 (Rev. 11-5-04) Page 5 cf 11
Surface Water: Pat Mayse Lake
Groundwater: 0
Contracts: 0
Other: Lake Crook
B. Treatment and Distribution System
IV. WASTEWATER SYSTEVI DATA
A. Wastewater System Data
1. Design capacity of wastewater treatment plant(s): 7.25 MGD
2. Is treated effluent used far irrigation on-site , off-site x_, plant
washdown x , or chlorination/dechlorination ?
If yes, approaimately 1_~_~n, nnpgallons per month.
3. Briefly describe the wastewater system(s) of the area serviced by the water
utility. Describe how treated wastewater is disposed of. Where applicable,
identify treatment plant(s) with the TCEQ name and number, the operator,
owner, and, if wastewater is discharged, the receiving stream. If possible,
attach a sketch or map which locates the plant(s) and discharge points or
disposal sites.
B. Wastewater Data for Service Area
1. Percen
t of water service area served by wastewate
r system: R 7_ 5 %
Month
2
ly volume treated for previous three years (
in 1,000 gallons):
.
Year
2008
2007
2006
January
95,240
166,920
83,160
February
117,310
97,560
91,990
March
191,930
115.010
1~7, 490
April
153,110
111,010
103,330
May
12
149
4
10 3 i i n
139~45-9
-
,
7une
103 330
126,980
89.940
luly
87,520
142,910
91,740
August
101,220
103,430
88,090
September
103.210
93.400
85,_.530
October
98,380
102,140
103,850
November
92,690
87 , 310
98,460
December
450
94
109 , 340
112,320
,
TOtal
1,368,840
L, 3Rn, 15.0
1_ 1 R4. ~l'fl
TCEQ-10218 (Rev. 1 i-5-04) Poge 6 of 11
APPENDIX A
CURRENT WATER/SEWER RATES
`VATER TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS FLO`V DIAGRAM
GROUND STORAGE/DISTRIBUTION PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
CITY OF PARIS SERVICE AREA MAP
CERTIFICA'I'E OF CO\VENIENCE AND NECESSITN'
• J: ~U,~ f t~t4~e»
AUa-21-2209 10:45 FROM:WATER BILLING _ 9037376951
pRDINANCE N0, 200____~=02 9
AN ORDINAHC£ 0F THE CITY COUNCILO~T 5, SEC'TVON 3~3(a), (b)
AMENDING SECT10NS 3422(b), ~~4'ATER DEP~SIT, A1JD SECTI~N
AND (c), 5EtiV~ER RATES, SEC~'ION 34-28(a)(9),
34-32, DISCONNECTION OR ~CONNE ~~~ANGE5 RECOM ENDED BY
METER TAMPERING CHARGE TO REFLECT
THE 20U8 ~+YAT£R A1VD SEV1ER ~TE ST AVINGS CLAUSE, A PENAL'TY
CLAUSE: ND PR01~lIDiNG FO AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
CLAUSE, A
st 2008 the City Counctl of the Ciry of Paris,
wJI-1EREAS, on the 25th day of Augu , ~ ~TQ~ by R W. Inc., with
Te x a s, were presented o~~ da~4~d~r Propos e d w a y tepand sewer rat~ increases; and,
certain findings and re 2°v~
WHEREAS, the Water and Sewer Rate Study recammends in sew2r a rat~s b~ two p ercent t adoPte~1 bY ~e
increase in water rates and a six percent (6~ Increase
City Councit; an ,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined th~s far wat r abest nd ewe services a d
oF Paris and its citizens to imp le m e n t t h e p r o p o s e d r a a e n d i n g
the 2048 VVater and Sewer Stv dY bY
some other changes recommended by
ortions of Chapter 34, Water, Sew2r, and Sewage Disposa], of the City Code of Ordinances.
P
THEREFa~ I~' O~DAINED BY TH~ CI't"~ Ct3UNCiL OF THE CiTY 0F
NOW I
PARIS, TEXAS:
Section 1.
'1 th' s approved
That the findings set out in the Qreamble to this ordinance are hereby
in a, .tng
Section 2, That Subsection (b) of Section 34'2~~ r~a~ in°~e~nt~~~', as foljaws~~
City of Paris, Texas, be, and the sarne 1s hereby amended
"Sec. 3422. Watsr rat.es.
(b) Charges for water furnished by the Ciry, measured in cubic feet, are size estabtished as follows based upon customer
for the fi st
cludes Sthe c osteter
incorporate a base monthly cost which n ~ubic f~Qt or portion of
increment Qf 1~Qr, ~ bic feet uped above the first i0n0cr~ment;
one hundred ( )
Pag: 1 of 6
u.Z:euioY"- -
ALG-21-2009 10:45 FF.'OM:WATER BILLING (.5(by51
METER S12E
(lachrs)
3/4 or less
1 and Larger
METER SIZE
(lnshes)
3f4or1QSs
1 through 2
3 .
4
5
e and larger
RESIDEN?'IAL CLASS
BASE COST FO R Fl RST
1 NCREMENT
(1n Cnblc Fe_t)
$ 8.82 for first 200
$42,96 for first 1,000
SERVICE 1N
EXCESS OF BASE
(For Eath Add)Hona1100 Cabtr Feet)
$2.98
$ 2.98
COMMERCI4L111VD{1STRI4L C1.AS'S
EASE COST FOR FI RS?'
t NCREMENT
(In CubkFeei)
$ 10.74 for first 200
$ 42.46 for first 1,000
$154.22 for first 3,000
$2,534.00 for first 100,000
$3,800.00 for first 150,000
$5,467.00 for first 200,040
Section 3. That Subsections (a), (b) and (c) of Section 34-23 of the Cade of
Ordinances of the City of Paris, Texas, be, and the same are hereby amended to read in its
endrety as follows:
"Sec. 34-23. Sewer rates • Far custamers using Clt3' water,
(a) Charges for sevver service furnished by the City to residenrial, commercial
and industrial custflmers shall be based upon customer dass and meter sizE,
incorporating a base monthly cost for t31e first increnent of usage and a cast
for eat-h additional one hundred (100) cubic feQt or portion of one hvndred
(lad) cubic feet abave the flrst increment, as fo1lflws:
RESID£NT1AL CLASS.
NIETER SJZE
(Inthcs)
3/4 or 12ss
1 and Larger
BASE COST FOR FI RST
INCREMENT
►n Cublr Frrt)
$ 9.83 for hrst 200
$45.86 for first 1000
$2.98
$2.44
$ 2.44
$ 2.44
$ 2.44
$ 2.44"
$ 3.98
$ 3.98
CaMMERCIAL/JNDt1S7RIAL CLAS.S
SERVICE !N
EXCESS OF BASE
(For Each Adfi+dona! IQOCuhft Feet)
SERVICE IN
EXCESS OF BASE
(Far Eac.3 AddlConQ! i(}0 Cubtc Fet2)
page 2 of 6
RLG-21-2209 1~:45 FROM:WATER BILLIN~~ 7~JJ(b7~1
'~•~v~
BASE COS7'FOR FIRS1'
SERVICE IN
METER SfZE
INCREMENT
EXCESS OF BASE
(For Eech Addttiflnal 100 Cublc Ftet)
(lnches)
()n tn61c Fert)
3/4 cr less
$13.10 for first 200
$4.14
1 through 2
$ 45.86 for first 1000
$ 4,14
Larger than 2
$ 92.77 for first 2,000
$ 4.14
(b) Monthly residential customers' wastewater volume for purposes of
assessing the sewer charge shall be based upon one hundred percent (100°l0)
aFthe 2ctua4 metered potable water consumption averaged for the preceding
November, January, and February consumption, which shall be known as the
"flat winter average." Customers that do not have recorded water usage for
each of the winter average months will have thetr winter average calculated
based an the residential class average of 625 cubic feeL
Monthly commercial and Industrial customers' wastewater volurne shall
be based upon one hundred (100) percent of the actual metered potable
water consumption, except those custamers whose wastewater is metered,
and their volume shall be based upon ane hundred (10()) percent of the
metered wastewater. The farmer shall be billed for one hundred (100)
percent of the metered potable water and the latter shall be bi]led for one
hundred (100) percent of the metered wastewater.
(c) USers desiring to discharge sQwage into the Cit}'s sewerage system, the
strength of which servag° exceeds two hundred fifty ( 2~0 parts p mil3ion
bioc hemica l o x y gen demand (BOD), two hundred fifty ~r millon a of a Qr mmonia
of tata1 suspended solids, (TSS), ar thirty (30) parts p
(NNa), and which is acceptable under artitle II1 of Chis chapter, may do so
upan written permission of the tity and by paying a rnant.hly treatment
c'harge in &e 2nount of ninety-four cents ($0.94) per Pound of biochemical
oxygen de3nand (BOD) in excess of thQr a}lf total susp~dled agas
demand (BOD); forty-threQ cents ($0.43) p poud o
(7`SS) in excess of the allowable total svspended solids (TSS); and fifty-two
cents. ($0.52) per pound of amrnonia (NH3 ) in excess of the allowable
ammania strength. The city shall make the netessary tests of the user's
sewage strength to determine tizis charge. The charge prescribed by this
subsection shall be in addition to the charges prestribed in subsection (a)
hereof.p
Settion 4. That Subsection (a) (9) of Section 34-28 of the Code of Ordinances of the
City oF Paris, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended to increase the amount af the
deposi: reauired far fireplug meters to read as follows:
°Sec. 34-78 Deposit ta assure paymenL
Page 3 of 6
AUG-21-2';2709 10: 4o FP.OM: WATEEH BiLLiNT,~ ljuJ fJ (by71 U. 1 Q~ ' v
(a) Each purchaser, cansumer, or customer of City water, City sewer, or City
residential garbage collection service, as such services are provided by the
City under its Code of Ordinances, shall, at the dme of making application for
such water, sewer, or garbage service, make a deposit, with the Ciry, in the
following amount;
(9) Fire plug meters, one thousand two hvndred seventy-five
dollars ($1,275.00) or current cost of ineter.
*0
Section 5. That Section 34-32 of the Code of Ordinances of the Ciry of Paris, Texas
be, and the same is hereby amended to revise service charges or fees For disconnecting and
reconnecting water servlce or making any other service calls and to establish a chargQ or
fee for tampering with a City water meter, to read in its enrirEty as follows:
pSez. 34-32. Disconnection or reconnsctian service charge or fee and
rneter tampertng penalty.
(a) When it becomes necessary for the water department of the City to
disconnect or recann$ct water service or make any other service calls, the
Eollowing scheduls of charges shall appty:
Sched ule ChargE
S:flO a.m. to 5:04 p.m., Monday through Friday . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25.00
5;00 p.m. to S:Ofl a.m., Monday through Friday . . . . . . . • • • • • • . • • . • • • • $35.00
Saturdays, Sundays and Holitlay5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • • • • • • • • . . • • . • , $35.00
There shali be no crarge for temporary servicp tfl a building site; however, at
the time of transfer from temparary service to permanent service, t3ze above
charge will be made. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person other than a City Water Department
employee, City Enb neering Departrnent or Public Works Department
employee to install, remove, repair, adjust, turn on or aff or tamper with a
city water meter,
(c) A meter tampering charge of one hundred fifty dallars ($150) shall be
assessed against any customer that tampers with the city water meter as
described below. This charge does not include the cost of any water
illegatly taken during or following the metef tampering. This fee wiJl be
charged and recovered from the account active at the time of the tampering.
In cases whc-re therz is ne currenr active account, the fep will be thargpd to
t}ie property owner and new service not initiated until the fee is paid.
hleter tampering shall inciude but not be limited to the fallowing:
Page 4 of 6
AUG-21-2UUy 1U:4b FNLI~: WH I tK G1LL11y'J - I ~ i u»1
1, Broken meter lock;
2. Damaged, broken, or disconnected curb stop;
3. Dialog damaged or disconnected;
4. Meter lock removed;
5. DamagQd or broken meter;
5. Meter stolen;
7. Unauthorized connection inserted;
8. Any unauthorized water usage; or
9. Any other damage to City property as a result of tampering acdviries."
Sectian b, That the water and sewer rates established in Sections 2 and 3 above
shall be effective with September 1, 2008 consumption, and wtll be reflected in water and
sewer billings beginning October 1, 2008.
Section 7. All provisions of the ordinances of the City of PaMs, Texas in conflict with the
provistons of thIs ordlnance are hereby repealed, and all other provisions af the ardinances of
the City aF Paris nat in confllct with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force
and effert '
Section 8. The repeal-of any ordinance or part of ardinances affected by the
enactment oE thts ardlnance shall not be construed as abandonIng any action no%v pending
under or by virtue of such ordinance or as discontinuing, abating, modifying, or altering any
penalty accruing or to accrue, oz as affecting any rights of the municipality under any section or
provisions of any ordinance at the time oEpassage of this ardinance.
Section 9. It 9s the intention of the City Council of the City af Paris that this
ardinance, and every provisian hereof, shall be considered severablQ, and the invalidity ar
partial invaIidity of any section, clause, or provisions af thls ardinance shall not affect the
validi'Ly of any other porton of this ordin2nce.
Sectiou 10. Any persan violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
guilty of a Misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be fined in accordance with Section 1-6
of the Cade of Ordinances and each and every day's continuance of any violation aP the
above-enumerated section(s) shaU constitute and be deemed a separate offense.
Sectifln 12. Introduced and read on first reading on August 25, 2008, at a regular
meeting af the City Council of the Ciry of Paris and read and passed on sezond reading on
September 8, 2008, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Paris; the same
being two (2) separate regular meetings of the City Council af the City of Paris.
Section 12. That this ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage of
tnQ s2cond reading and publfcation as requlred by law.
PASSED AND ADflPTED on secand and final reading this 9ti3 day af September,
2008.
4]seam~,.. /F~reiellenn, Mayor
F~: 5 of
CI I Y ur rHrcia
TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM (2003)
PAT MAYSE
LAKE
INTAKE
RAW VVATER CHEMICAL INJECTION
TO l.Ay1AR PUMPS Kh1n0< (WHEN NEEDED)
POVJER PARTNERS 4--- tiIETER R"1/li LAGOON No7e: roe R,aw SANaLe MusT BE iAKeN
WATER
PUMPS ME7ER METER AT WTAK=_ WHEN KrnnOa iS USED
INTAKE L-L
LAKE ~ R=WATER
METER
WASTEWATER RECYCLF,---=~ METER
RECYCLE
SAMPLING POINT
E`/ERY 2 HOURS ONHEN RECYCLINGe RAPID MIX
CHLORINE (707AL), NTU, pH. ALK. . STREAMINGCURR
MONITOR
RAW WATER BLEND
SAMPLING POIN7
EVERY 2 HOURS-. NTU
DAILY: ALK., pH, TEMP.
MONTHLY: TOC (SEE NOTE ABOVE)
CHEMICAL INJECTION
- ALUM
CARBON (WHEN NEEDED)
easiNS z a a
INFLUENT
- SAMPLING POINTS
EVERV2HOUR5.pH.TEMP.
BASIN t BASIN 2 BASIN 3 BASIN j
FLOCCULATION & FLOCCULATION & FLOCCULATION Z FLOCCUlAALL 4 BASINS
SEDIMENTATION ~ SEDiMENTATION SEDIMENTATION SEDIMENTEFFLUENT
INTS
SLUDGE SLUDGE SLUDGE - SAMPLING PO
SETTLED WATER evear z HouasNru, pH.
CONTINUOUS MONITORING CHEMICAL INJECTION Da.iLv (i BAsiN oNLh: nLK., ieMp.
NTU CHLORINE
FILTER 2
FILTER 1
EACH FILTER
FILTER 4
FILTER 3
10
EFFLUENT
FILTER 6
FILTER 5
11
SAMPLING POINTS
EACH FILTER EPFLUENT D1
FILTER 8
FILTER 7
10
eveRY z r+ouRS. r,Tu
GONTINUOUS MONITORING
FILTER 10
,i
FILTER 9
FILTER BACKWASH
COMBINED FILTER
NTU ~
EFFLUENT
COMBINED FILTER EFFLUENT
SAMPLING POINT
CONTINUOUS MONITORING
10
EVERY 2 HOURS. NTU CHLORINE (FREE), pH
CHIORINE (FRE=). NTU, pH, TEMP
CHEMICAL INJECTION
MONTHLY TCC
NaOH
MAXEY
FLUORIDE
SLUDGE
LAGOON pUMPS
BASINS
AMMONIA
f
0.5 MG CLEARWELLIMAXEY PUMPS
1
SLUDGE
0 5 MG
SAMP'JNG POIN7
PUMPS
r0 r'iNE CREEtc
CLEARWELL
MAXEY
(caLL=_c?Eo:.rauk+as wHeN auNNm+G
OUTFALI 10479-OC1
TO SLUDGE SPRAY
PUMPS
cV=_R~ 2 r,cuFS N'L cHLoRiNe i7or; c,
FiELD
TRANSFER
(_n= ACP.ES)
PUMPS
CONTINUOUS
CONTINUOUS MONI70RING
~
MONITORING
CrLORWE;10i ).P_UGP.iDE 0,
Z.3 i4IG
I
F
CnLORWE''_", NTU o^
CLEARVVELL
~ hteT~~
TRP.NSFER. P 0
PUMPS SAMPLING POINT
ME7ER ME'ER HCUP.L'! CHLORitJE -C-:F?E=` NT1 ~r
I I
CONTINUOUS MONITORING ~_uoa;CE AM^^cNi^
CF! CPiNE (TO? i. NTU
TO GROUNDSTORAGE
CITY OF PARIS
GROUND STORAGE/DISTRlBUTION PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
TREATED WATER
2003
FROM
WTP
LCWSD
HWY 82 WEST
LGWSD
HN/Y 82 EAST
PARIS W.W.T.P.
-:c M S,~Jr I ~
T
^i
i
L' C EN D
i
r.= i~
c=r`~c
^'r
G
~'.:.hl?= O~~C D{ -C_S i~.?/
.
i
~
.
sC.==~iw r----
?GF
c~
_
~
- I
-
~ i i
.
-y - ►"_'----WY -J ,
r-
i-------------------~ I ~
~
RE
M
.L l ~'S
~ C
C.~'~
/
-
~ r ;..r.>>
~ 1
~
~
~
.r.^ ~
-1 ~
w=ss
57
~
`
~
~
I ~ C._._-._
- - - - - - - - - - - -
_ -
1 i
S~
C~
~r-~~~~
C-:t,,'Z7
T
c,•,},~r'
~
~
cn
:E
N
~
N
~
U
~
~
~
.
~
U
~
~
0
~
o
\
,
-rr
I
1
~
~
I
; ~
~
,
>
,
C,
I
,
,
,
~
~
- ,
1
~
1
;
t__.-;"" /
,
I
~
,
~,f,---- ~
'
~
r~ I
i
. ~
I '
~ I
~
,
,
I `
,
L_.
~
~
J
i
•
-
~
~
'
~
~
-
~
i
~
i
,
1
1
f
,
I
1
~
,
I
.
i '
~
;
`
i
~
i
r
I
~
,
1
,
,
;
/
~
.
' `1^,~F4 \~m~ ~.I ~,.Rt, ~_a~.~~,q~sv%1u.:.+Tn~.s..~~~✓v` ~ ,yz•,,
~
~
i
of &Xmi
~ i E \
~ CITY OF F.ARIS
uftQ coUM, TEVs ~
7 )
;
~ ljzibin$ bulV ttpplie~ fnr tL`rfIfIC2lfillYi to }.ITIIltibl` 4ntitrr
l I t I I T t~ J s F r~ T i r r f u r t l~e c v n b r it i r i u c ~ i i t~ i t r c r5situ uf tl~r pi►blir, .xiil ~
it hubing keen Mirntitteb l,v #~is (~Ianizuissiurc that t4e PiilTlic
IIicll iii f~ct be buzzicceb EtV t~~ p rut0i5iurt
cnn)Jeniertce attb necesbitv xv ~
) nf siuh serbirc 6u thih pplicaitt, 15 vtititlc~ to unl i--, lierebu ~qraritEl
~ &~zttficttljc n~ ~ janimztiicxtce nn~ N-rrFsertv
tiuittf~~:rc~ to ~rrL1iDr iu~ttrr iitilitv SkrLiicr tL, t~1~it
srrtiire nrFtt ur tljusc bcrliirr arriis bLSigitatrb 1TLi fiitul U1Drbc r ur
;
00rlkr5 bulv vzitereti bv tfris Ci,utnmshtuic, iuhirlT (I~rlk~r «r WrDrrS i,
/ 7 • 1 • •
tti~ ~IiC IIll fi~k' fIt thk' l'~-UIItIlII55iQIl uff«v~ ili r.~1l5titl, Zllib z11-L' ~
~ iutttters IIf ufficizzl rrcur6 miailable f«r Publir p Vrti«it;
~ ttttb 11r it kitLifxtic ficrtljrr tllat tlirsc
~rr5ritto ~i1 v11tbrztcc tlle ntttlioritu titt) tEtc L)iitir «f tliis (6r-izttEL: tii
' prUt1ibo stull utilitu serliice in Z-tcrurlttitre iuith, tlle l;ziils llf tl1is
tErE ~u1e5 uf thi5 L3ittutisyiait, "uL,,rcf nttlv to Ziitu Pafz~rr <titl =1
re5pousi1iilitv af tFEiEi ~nutziti5~iurt ti-i rcLiLi1:r 1-,r nnikiil thi- Q,Vz-tifiratr
iii itiIicl1E ur iit purt itpiizi 'i --'itLTsrquritt 51wti,in~ tlizzt tljr pidlir
\ cc~1t11eitirttrr Iiicl ttrrrstiitu Eu~1t~ll l,r hrttrr ~rrlTrl thrrrhu.
~41S£lI1~ zit u5tit1, `L:exxs, t1116 15t Dziu uf 3\~1_1uentbrr,
N~ .
I
Philip F. Ricketts
SECRETAPY OF THE COMMISSiON v~
i , i~i1 p,~ , ~ ' i~c\r~ .
+ ` q' r ~ i ~ i„}~ i •
~ ~ ~.•y