22-MOTION TO APPROVE PURCHASE OF NEW FIRE ENGINE/PUMPERCITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING SHEET
Submittal Date:
Originating Department:
Presented By:
Agenda Item No.:
11/10/11
Council Date:
Fire Department
Ronnie Grooms, Fire Chief
22
11/14/11
,
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
[atv acTtotv iTENt ] - Move to approve the purchase of a new Fire engine/pumper.
POLICY ISSUE(S):
Vehicle replacement.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved funding for the purchase of a replacement pumper for fiscal year 11/12. As per
direction, the FD completed an evaluation of available stock model apparatus and are providing information as to
how the process worked, criteria involved, options available, and the FD's recommendation for purchase (See
attached Staff Report for details).
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
EXHIBITS:
Staff report.
ACTION:
BUDGET INFO:
❑
Financial Report ~ Minute Order
Expense
❑ D
t
R
epar
ment
eport ❑ Resolution
❑ Presentation ❑ O
di
Budgeted Amt.
400,000.00
r
nance
❑ Public Hearing ❑ Other
yTD Actual
Acct. Name
Capital Projects Fund
Acct. Number
11-1004-32-99
FisCAL NoTES:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Z Administration ❑ City Clerk ❑ Community Development ❑ EMS/IT Z Finance 2 Fire
❑ Municipal Court ❑ Legal ❑ Libraty ❑ Police ❑ Eng./Public Works ❑ Utilities
City of Paris
Revised 2/04/08
91
Paris Fire Department
A►DMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AT FIRE STATION NO. 1
1 444 NORTH MAIN STREET - PARIS, TX 75460
(903) 784-9225 - (903) 784-5304 F.4x
To Chief Ronnie Grooms:
As per your direction and the parameters presented, an Apparatus Committee was established and tasked with
making a recommendation for the purchase of a new pumper for the Paris Fire Department. The committee
consisted of Drivers Chad Graves, Jay Daughtrey, and Matt Barbee; and Firefighters Patrick Lynch and Joey
Rickman. Apparatus vendors were notified and asked to provide information regarding current stock pumpers
(Commercial chassis and Cab-over chassis) that met the following parameters: a) stock units already built and
available for immediate purchase, b) able to participate in a hands-on evaluation at the PFD during 11/7-9/2011,
and with an overall cost below $300,000.00. Such restrictive parameters certainly narrowed the window of
opportunity, reduced the field of available apparatus, and made the process more difficult as time was of the
essence. However, we were able to complete the evaluation process and have, what we feel to be, good data.
The evaluation process consisted of 12 major categories that each received a score graded on a scale from 1-5 (1
being the lowest and 5 the highest). The 12 categories themselves were determined to be those components of a
pumper type apparatus, we felt were needed to best meet the needs of our department and City and included:
1. Maneuverabi.lity (steering, wheelbase, turning radius, etc.).
2. Cab design (space, number of seats/arrangement, accessibility, safety, noise reduction, visibility, etc.).
3. Mechanics (acceleration; transmission shifting, etc.).
4. Brakes (stopping distance, auxiliary braking system-retarder, engine exhaust, etc.).
5. Warning System (visible lighting, audible siren, etc.).
6. Compartmentation (number, size, accessibility, durability, etc.) '
7. Maintenance (routine fluid check, major component accessibility, etc.). .
8. Vendor provided service center (location and proximity from Paris, capabilities, etc.).
9. Pumping (pump capacity, shifting, plumbing, gauges, foam capability, etc.).
10. Ergonomics (comfort, efficiency, safety, etc.).
11. Hose-loads (capacity, number of crosslays, accessibility, hose-bed, dividers, etc.).
12. Equipment Add-ons (what is needed to put the truck in service).
We evaluated six different apparatus from five different manufacturers; all had pros and cons. Two of the pumpers
were built using a commercial chassis and cab while the other four were of the cab-over design. Each unit was
evaluated using the criteria listed above and graded accordingly. The scores were tallied and the pumpers ranked
from 15L to 62h (most preferred to least preferred). Additionally, we compared each stock apparatus to our current
fleet to determine how well adaptable each would be (how would each accommodate the current inventory of
equipment we carry on a pumper, utility, any additional equipment or components needed, etc.). The committee
feels our current engine/pumper configuration is very user friendly and we feel these trucks have been, and
continue to be, quality pieces of equipment. After the scoring was completed and tallied, all the members of the
committee had actually ranked the same pumper as their top choice; the pumper produced by Crimson Fire. It
surpassed the other trucks in each category, except for Maintenance/Service Center location. Crimson Fire's
service center is 62 miles further away from the City of Paris than the next closest. However the company does
have two service trucks that can come to our location if needed.
Though more compact than our current fleet of pumpers, the Crimson pumper offers more compartmental space.
The truck provides a very smooth ride and a shorter turning radius than the other demos we evaluated. It has a
quiet and roomy cab that provides much needed space for personnel and PPE and filters out outside noise better
than the other stock, models (which is very irnportant for operators being able to effectively communicate with
dispatch and FD personnel). The Crimson pumper more aptly matches the overall layout (cab, compartments, etc.)
of our current pumper fleet (which reduces the overall acclimation time). Handline crosslays are installed in a
" 92
lower position (as opposed to our other pumpers and those evaluated too) on the side-body which makes for
easier accessibility. Additionally, the truck has hose-wells on the exterior for storing short sections of suction hose,
which frees up internal compartment space. The exterior of the vehicle is rugged and is very well built; what we
need for long-term service. ,
The ergonomics of this vehicle are extremely important to us as the end user; it has large heavy-duty door handles,
anti-slip tread plates on the interior steps of the vehicle as well as areas to mount needed equipment in the interior
of the vehicle. The cab offers very good visibility for the driver as well as the officer; there is a good field-of-vision
both in front of the vehicle and laterally. Routine fluid checks are easily accommodated without having to tilt the
cab (this saves wear and tear on the cab and is another innovative design feature). As stated previously, the truck
body has sufficient compartmentation, with numerous equipment trays, tool boards, and very good lighting, to
house all the equipment and tools we currently utilize on our other pumpers. The compartments are also covered
in durable finish which will help guard against scratches and dents from equipment.
As with any apparatus, safety is of paramount concern. This truck has a reinforced cab and a preferred warning
package including audible sirens (Q26'" as on our current fleet) and LED warning lights (LED are state-of-the-art and
reduce amperage needs, thus lessening alternator wear and bulb replacement). Both audible and visual warning
devices are extremely important and vital for safe emergency response. Other options this particular unit has (that
the other demos did not) are scene-lighting, KussmaulT"' system (electrical and' air charging system that maintains
readiness).
The Crimson pumper was built by a vendor who has a proven and well respected track-record in the fire service and
who produces high-quality equipment. This particular apparatus will be the easiest, of those evaluated, to place
into immediate service as it more closely matches what we have (related to compartment space and location,
operation, acclimation, etc.) and does not require the purchase of any additional equipment. Past history should be
an indication of future expectations; if this be true, and we the committee contend that it is, then the Crimson
apparatus should service our community and department well for at least the next 20+ years. The Crimson pumper
was clearly the best of the apparatus we evaluated and we feel this pumper will service our city and citizens much
better than any of the other stock pumpers.
In conclusion, the apparatus committee wishes to convey our gratitude for having the opportunity to serve our
department and our City in this capacity. We clearly understand the magnitude of such a large monetary
investment and the importance of making the right decision. Given the parameters, we feel we have completed
the task as logically, systematically, and expediently as is possible and believe our choice for apparatus purchase
will, more than likely, outlast most of our careers.
Sincerely,
Chad Graves
Jay Daughtrey
Matt Barbee
Joey Rickman
Patrick Lynch
- 93
W
N
2
V
~
a
~
O
O
H
0
cW
G
0
U
W
~
Z
Y
Q
~
Z
Q
N
0
H
a
O
z
0
F-
~
Q
W
GC
W
a
~
~
a
Y
V
0
N
T-1
~
~
rn
0
ri
O
~
~
~
w
W
J
d
0
V
oa
c
Y
C
N
~D
ri
M
~
Ln
m
~
a ~
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
I-
~
~O
rn
V
1
Z 0
&
~
O
~ V
O
I-
M
O
O
r-I
00
m
~
M
N
M
M
N
N
O w
N Q-
O
O
O
O
n
O^i
E
0
ri
n
o
Lri
cri
~
U a
N
~
rn
N
N
N
Z
~
a
°
°
.
O
o
o
(A o~
°
o
0
0
0
0
0
u
~
~
~
~
o
a
N
p Z a'
O W
w
w
~
w
w
w
Q
}
}
Z
~
c.r bD
C
W o°J,o
O
O
;
O
Z
O
J~~
Z
Z
,
}
Z
p
Z
E =
N
W
oa ~
E =
r
o
N
}
p
~n
cn
cn
Z
~ ~
Z
~
~
~
c
0
~
+
+ Gl +
+
o) m
3 c
cr i 3
v)
W
0
cn
W
cn
W
cn
W
in
W
y 0 4p
}
Z
~
}
}
}
~ N W
Q r
O
U
Q
o
o
W
W
o
0
0
Z
Z
}
}
Z
Z
LL
Y
Z
O
O
O
O
~
O
O
~
~
~
~
~
r-i
a
~
C
'
0
0
a
U
0
Tr
J
~
~
-
o
~
o
~
~
~
~
~
~
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
}
N
N
N
N
N
N
Q
Z
W
W
0^
W
U ^
^
a
Q
u~
w
U
U. (
~
A
O
z
. 94
4~
C _Z U
4-J
"O •N c E ~
~ ~ 3
~ '
4~ ~
N
~
~
~
~
co
v
~
±
.
~
3
3 ~ o
0 >
~ o -2 ~ c
-M ~ V)
~ IO p4 L QJ
O ~
Q
4 1 4-
~ ~ ~ C, v
c o ~
~ t
m Q) ~ ° v
C °
-C
U
~ N C 41 ~
o E o
~ ~ L
O 3
a v
V E N
O
° ~ ~
'
*
~
~
W
v
.
a 0-
~
3
~ f° °J
~ v E tn
~
N
~ L
~ Y
~
O
Q O
tn
U m
4- ~
O ~ C ~
3
V)
a Ln o
.
0 VI N U
a1 ~ C p ~
T
ti
L :3 O
M
~
co
a
4'' >
L
4J (0 l0 E
~
U
~ N u' O
L C
t ~
O
~
E ~6
0
~
~
3
0- C
Y ~ w
~ t]0 N
V
O M
C6
U
~
L
N
V N ~ ~
N
v
v
3 Q
u E
:3
E
~ p~O z~ Q'
N
ON
m E 0 p ° p
= c C u- W = N
co
N
~ Q co w OE
u
co
N ~ ~ .^i U
co
c~.~
0EI - ~
•L
L
~
M CN ~ +
a
>
M
~
O
0- ~ ao o ~ °
E
~
0.
U
U
t .~q N
v
II
U
U Ln vf V
N X
w~ o w
II
U
~
3
U
T-i N fr') -zi
Cab-over versus Commercial Chassis Apparatus
1. A Cab-over chassis is specifically designed and built for fire service
use, providing longer service-life. 2. A Cab-over chassis has a tighter turning radius and so is more
maneuverable and easy to handle.
3. A Cab-over chassis is designed with more window space and thus
provides increased visibility.
4. A Cab-over chassis provides more personnel room with larger
doors for access and more space for PPE (gear).
5. A Commercial chassis must be modified for.fire service use.
6. Generally, a Cab-over chassis offers a longer warranty.
7. The chassis of most Cab-overs are built with all aluminum
construction, which provides increased corrosion resistance.
8. Most importantly, a Cab-over chassis provides increased
Firefighter safety.
I."_ 95
Information on Trucks
Crimson Fire Legend Series
Seats 6 total, 5 SCBA seats
Water Tank Size: 1000 gallons
Avg. Score: 56
Ranked 1St by all members on truck committee
Pump Size: 1500 gpm
Foam tank: 30 Class A
Overall Construction: 4.8
Price: $300,000.00
• Maneuverability-Short wheel base and overall length, Best turning radius of all trucks
test driven- Avg. 4.6
• Seating & cab space- Plenty of room to mount equipment (flashlights, radios, MDT etc.),
durable interior (floor and walls), quiet cab- Avg. 4.8
• Driving- Good acceleration, shifts smooth, good field of vision, smooth ride, reinforced
cab(Very Important safety factor for Paris FD crew)- Avg. 5
• Braking- Good stopping distance with full water tank-Avg. 4.8
• Warning light package- LED warning package which uses less electricity which in turn
removes the need for a generator, high visibility which increases safety for personnel on
scene as well as citizens- Avg. 5
• Compartment space- Has more compartment space then our current pumpers, has tool
boards and equipment trays already mounted, has compartment LED lighting for night
operations-Avg. 5
• Maintenance- Has easily accessible fluid check area at front grille, which reduces the
need to raise the cab, pump access is also easily accessible w/o the need to remove
equipment to access pump-Avg.4.4
• Service/Maintenance Center: Mansfield 137 miles, they have two service trucks, Paris
Fire Department already has a good rapport with Metro Fire(Pump testing, hydraulic
tools service), Will send service techs to station for maintenance-Avg. 4
• Pumping: Pumps well, gauges are easy to read, color coded, 1500 Gallons Per Minute
Pump(Same size pump as all current Paris FD apparatus; anything lower reduces
availability of the amount of water Paris FD personnel can use) - Avg. 4.4
• Ergonomics: Steps are large and sturdy, large heavy duty door handles, Cab built
around driver, Officers side has area for MDT, anti-slip tread plate Avg.4.2
• Hose Loads: 2-crosslays are low and easily accessible, front discharge with hose well is
covered, has hose well under intakes which saves compartment space and gives option
of an additional attack line Avg. 4
• Equipment Add-ons already installed
1. Federal Signal Q213 Siren (same as current Paris FD apparatus)
2. (2) Front Brow Night Scene Lights (12volt LED)
3. (6)All LED Perimeter Night Scene Lighting (12volt LED, same as
current Paris FD apparatus except new these are LED)
I 96
4. Large Right Side Storz Discharge (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
5. Kussmal Battery Charging System (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
6. Auxiliary Air Pump for air brake system (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
7. Equipment Trays (keeps equipment organized; out of the
elements; more productive use of compartments)
8. Non-slip Mats on the interior of all compartments (same as
current Paris FD apparatus; saves wear and tear on compartment,
and tools)
9. Tool Boards (option already installed, same as current Paris FD
apparatus; organization of tools makes it easier to find during
emergencies; Must be added on to all other apparatus looked at)
10. (5)Bostrom SCBA Locking Seats (Huge Safety feature for Paris FD
crew)
11. Upgraded Heavy Duty Interior Cab for longer life span.
12. Front Bumper discharge (same as current Paris FD apparatus)
13. Cab Over chassis (Service life span of 20+ years; Huge Safety
factor for Paris FD crew; Made for the fire service; same as
current Paris FD apparatus)
14. NFPA required Ground Ladder's
15. Class A Foam System w/ 30 gal. Foam Cell (same as current Paris
FD apparatus)
• Equipment Add-ons Needed
1. None (Available for Immediate Delivery)
• Additional Comments: Well built, proven manufacturer with the City of Paris Fire
Department, comfortable for crew, easy access to dash area for mounting radios and
other electronic equipment, Truck will be the easiest to put in service and most closely
matches current apparatus. Truck has adequate compartment space for current and
future needs of the department.
- 1 97
7. Equipment Trays (keeps equipment organized; out of the
elements; more productive use of compartments)
8. Non-slip Mats on the interior of all compartments (same as
current Paris FD apparatus; saves wear and tear on compartment,
and tools)
9. Tool Boards (same as current Paris FD apparatus; organization of
tools makes it easier to find during emergencies)
10. (3)Bostrom SCBA Locking Seats (Huge Safety featwre for Paris FD
crew)
11. Foam Logix Class A foam system w/ 30 Gallon foam Cell (same as
current Paris FD apparatus)
12. Front Bumper discharge (same as current Paris FD apparatus)
13. Side Pump Panel Steps w/ lighting for access to Deck Monitor
14. (3)Hose Bed Dividers for LDH hose, and 2.5 inch attack Lines
(Same as current Paris FD apparatus)
15. Supply of DEF (Diesel Exhaust fluid) fluid for 2010 Government
diesel motor emissions.
16. 2.5 inch discharge in rear of apparatus (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
17. Upgraded LED Light Bar
18. Deck Gun Monitor, and Automatic Fog Nozzle Tip (same as
current Paris FD apparatus)
• Additional Comments: Interior (Dash, Door coverings) plastic not very rugged, Truck
appears to be built with bottom line in mind not quality. Truck had mechanical issue
after sitting over night, required mechanic to fix. To put Pumper in service it would
require upwards of an estimated $45,000 dollars quoted by manufacturer to add
needed additional equipment. (Tool Boards, Equipment trays, front discharge, foam cell,
foam tank, scene lighting, LDH discharge etc.)
9s
Pierce Saber Pumper
Seats 6, 5 SCBA Pump: 1250 gpm
Water Tank Size: 1000 gallons Foam: 20 Class A
Avg. Score 39.6 Overall Construction 2.8
Ranked 3rd by truck committee Price: $295,000.00
• Maneuverability: good turning radius-Avg. 3.8
• Seating & Cab Space: Cab space is decent, Roof low in front seating area, not a lot of leg
room on officer's side- Avg. 3.2
• Driving: Ride is rough, transmission down shifts hard, good acceleration-Avg. 3.6
• Braking: braking is good, engine brake comes on quickly-Avg.3.6
• Warning Light Package: Meets minimum standards and nothing more, had issue with
rear rotating light working intermittently, not very visible- Avg.2
• Compartment Space- Roll-up doors don't look they are high quality, seals coming out
already from roll-up doors, does include some adjustable shelves, durable compartment
covering, decent amount of compartment space- Avg. 3.4
• Maintenance: Small access panel near driver's seat for fluid check, good pump access
through removable panel, however uses urea- Avg. 3.2
• Service/Maintenance Center: Denton 109 miles- Avg. 4
• Pumping: has issue with gauges on pump panel currently, will need replacing; top
mount pump panel- Avg. 2.8
• Ergonomics: Power mirrors (driver side OOS), built around driver-Avg. 3.4
• Hose Loads: 2- crosslays, front discharge (no cover), high rear hosebed, hosebed just big
enough for LDH- Avg. 3.2
• Equipment Add-Ons already installed
1.
Class A Foam System
• Equipment Add-Ons
Needed
1.
Federal Signal Q2B Siren (same as current Paris FD apparatus)
2.
Auxiliary Air Pump for air brake system (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
3.
Equipment Trays (keeps equipment organized; out of the
elements; more productive use of compartments)
4.
Non-slip Mats on the interior of all compartments (same as
current Paris FD apparatus; saves wear and tear on compartment,
and tools)
5.
Tool Boards (same as current Paris FD apparatus; organization of
tools makes it easier to find during emergencies)
6.
(3)Bostrom SCBA Locking Seats (Huge Safety feature for Paris FD
crew)
7.
Foam Logix Class A foam system (same as current Paris FD
apparatus) y `
100
8. (3)Hose Bed Dividers for LDH hose, and 2.5 inch attack Lines
(Same as current Paris FD apparatus)
9. 2.5 inch discharge in rear of apparatus (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
Additional Comments: Tarp connectors look cheap, roll up doors leak; deck gun, scene
lights and striping will be included if purchased, additional equipment available but will
raise price. Temp. Gauge not working. To place pumper into service will take an
estimated $15,000.
101
Ferrara Intruder 2 Pumper
Seats 6, 5 SCBA Pump: 1750 gpm
Water Tank Size: 1000 gallons Foam: NONE
Avg. Score 39 Overall Construction 3
Ranked 4th by truck committee Price: $273,727.00
• Maneuverability: maneuvered very well, good turning radius- Avg. 4
• Seating & Cab Space: Rear cab has decent space, rear facing seats have lap belts only,
large dash area but nowhere to mount equipment- Avg. 3
• Driving: Excellent field of vision, vibrates a lot and rough ride, very tight steering, noisy
during driving- Avg.3.2
• Braking: Good stopping distance- Avg.3.2
• Warning Light Package: Front Scene light, 2- telescoping scene lights, nice lightbar but
perimeter lights were lacking- Avg. 2.6
• Compartment Space: Large rear compartment, middle compartments will not
accommodate SCBA's, no tool boards, mounting problems for equipment, leak water in
compartments from vents- Avg. 3.2
• Maintenance: No panel to check fluids from inside cab, good access to pump- Avg.3.2
• Service/Maintenance Center: Houston 292 miles, tech service available for on site- Avg.
2
• Pumping: Galvanized plumbing (rusts easily), pump panel does not look well made,
layout is nice- Avg. 3.4
• Ergonomics: awkward brake pedal, hand holds and steps are nice, compartment latches
are nice, windshield is large- Avg. 3.4
• Hose loads: 2 crosslays, 1 front discharge, lower hose bed for LDH, fixed steps for hose
bed- Avg. 3.4
• Equipment Add-Ons All ready Installed
1. Large Right Side Storz Discharge (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
• Equipment Add-ons needed
1. Federal Signal Q26 Siren (same as current Paris FD apparatus)
2. Auxiliary Air Pump for air brake system (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
3. Equipment Trays (keeps equipment organized; out of the
elements; more productive use of compartments)
4. Non-slip Mats on the interior of all compartments (same as
current Paris FD apparatus; saves wear and tear on compartment,
and tools)
5. Tool Boards (same as current Paris FD apparatus; organization of
tools makes it easier to find during emergencies)
~ 102
6. (3)Bostrom SCBA Locking Seats (Huge Safety feature for Paris FD
crew)
7. Foam Logix Class A foam system (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
8. (3)Hose Bed Dividers for LDH hose, and 2.5 inch attack Lines
(Same as current Paris FD apparatus)
9. 2.5 inch discharge in rear of apparatus (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
10. Deck Gun Monitor, and Automatic Fog Nozzle Tip (same as
current Paris FD apparatus)
• Additional Comments: Large dash area but will look cluttered with equipment mounted,
chassis by different manufacturer from builder (HME), no tool boards, radiator exposed
to dips. To put Pumper in service it will take an estimated $25,000 to add additional
equipment.
103
Sutphen C2 Commercial Chassis Pumper
Seats 5, 4 SCBA
Water Tank: 1000 gallons
Avg. Score 37.6
Ranked 5th by truck committee
Pump: 1250 gpm
Foam: 30 gallon/no educator
Overall Construction 3.6
Price: $224,976.00
• Maneuverability: Very long, poor turning radius, bad angle of departure- Avg. 2.4
• Seating & Cab Space: SCBA ready, no storage space in cab, no area to mount MDT-
Avg. 2
• Driving: Drives rough, shifts a lot on side streets, good acceleration on level ground-
Avg. 2.6
• Braking: Average braking- Avg.3
• Warning Light Package: Good lightbar, perimeter lights are average, no scene lights-
Avg. 3.2
• Compartment Space: Good compartment space, has compartment shelves and slide
outs, good lighting and doors, plenty of space- Avg. 4
• Maintenance: easy to access, for pump access you have to remove equipment to open
panel but once you do it is plentiful- Avg. 3.6
• Service/Maintenance Center: Jacksboro 175 miles- Avg. 2.8
• Pumping: Top mount pump panel, color coded, simple design- Avg. 3.2
• Ergonomics: Driver is decent, officer poor, firefighter area poor, tall steps, rides high,
good access to hose bed- Avg. 3
• Hose loads: 2 crosslays low, no front discharge, short hose bed but low- Avg. 3.2
• Equipment Add-Ons Already installed
1. None
• Equipment Add-Ons needed for Service
1. Federal Signal Q2B Siren (same as current Paris FD apparatus)
2. Front Brow Night Scene Lights (12volt LED)
3. LED Perimeter Night Scene Lighting (12volt LED, same as current
Paris FD apparatus except new these are LED)
4. Large Right Side Storz Discharge (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
5. Auxiliary Air Pump for air brake system (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
6. Equipment Trays (keeps equipment organized; out of the
elements; more productive use of compartments)
7. Non-slip Mats on the interior of all compartments (same as
current Paris FD apparatus; saves wear and tear on compartment,
and tools)
8. Tool Boards (same as current Paris FD apparatus; organization of
tools makes it easier t; f0~
dduring emergencies)
1
9. Foam Logix Class A foam system (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
10. Front Bumper discharge (same as current Paris FD apparatus)
11. Extended Front Bumper
12. (3)Hose Bed Dividers for LDH hose, and 2.5 inch attack Lines
(Same as current Paris FD apparatus)
13. 2.5 inch discharge in rear of apparatus (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
14. Deck 6un Monitor, and Automatic Fog Nozzle Tip (same as
current Paris FD apparatus)
• Additional Comments: Well built body, tall cab(fall hazard), Poor turning radius, ran
rough during test drive(motor), Cab not meant to last as long as current type
apparatus(7 to 10 years max.), no foam system just tank currently. To put pumper into
service it will take an estimated $20,000 to add additional equipment.
105
E-One Commercial Chassis Pumper
Seats 5, 4 SCBA Pump: 1250 gpm
Water tank: 1000 gallons Foam: 30
Avg. Score 35 Overall Construction 1.9
Ranked 6th by truck committee Price: $187,000.00
• Maneuverability: poor turning radius, poor angle of departure, long truck- Avg. 2.4
• Seating & Cab Space: No room for equipment mounting, no area for MDT, no room for
storage- Avg. 1.8
• Driving: drove well, vibrated at highway speed- Avg. 3.6
• Braking: average braking distance- Avg. 3.4
• Warning Light Package: Meets minimum standards and nothing else- Avg. 1.6
• Compartment Space: No crows nest, passenger side compartment short but deep, will
not have room for current equipment complement carried on engines, roll-up doors not
high quality- Avg. 2
• Maintenance: easy access, pump access panels easily removed- Avg. 4.2
• Service/Maintenance center: Van Alystne 76 miles- Avg. 4.8
• Pumping: no pump shift override, no front discharge, loud when pumping at pump
panel, smaller pump than current Paris FD apparatus 1250 Gallons Per Min - Avg. 3
• Ergonomics: steps are small going to pump panel, no storage area, hosebed high- Avg. 3
• Hose loads: no front discharge, hose bed not big enough for 2%" hose- Avg. 2
• Equipment Add-Ons already Installed
1. None
• Equipment Add-Ons needed
1. Federal Signal Q2B Siren (same as current Paris FD apparatus)
2. Front Brow Night Scene Lights (12volt LED)
3. LED Perimeter Night Scene Lighting (12volt LED, same as current
Paris FD apparatus except new these are LED)
4. Large Right Side Storz Discharge (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
5. Kussmal Battery Charging System (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
6. Auxiliary Air Pump for air brake system (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
7. Equipment Trays (keeps equipment organized; out of the
elements; more productive use of compartments)
8. Non-slip Mats on the interior of all compartments (same as
current Paris FD apparatus; saves wear and tear on compartment,
and tools)
9. Tool Boards (same as current Paris FD apparatus; organization of
tools makes it easie~t,Q f,{nd during emergencies)
Ub
10. (3)Bostrom SCBA Locking Seats (Huge Safety feature for Paris FD
crew)
11. Foam Logix Class A foam system w/ 30 Gallon foam Cell (same as
current Paris FD apparatus)
12. Front Bumper discharge (same as current Paris FD apparatus)
13. Side Pump Panel Steps w/ lighting for access to Deck Monitor
14. (3)Hose Bed Dividers for LDH hose, and 2.5 inch attack Lines
(Same as current Paris FD apparatus)
15. Supply of DEF (Diesel Exhaust fluid) fluid for 2010 Government
diesel motor emissions.
16. 2.5 inch discharge in rear of apparatus (same as current Paris FD
apparatus)
17. Upgraded LED Light Bar
18. Deck Gun Monitor, and Automatic Fog Nozzle Tip (same as
current Paris FD apparatus)
• Additional comments: Truck had two leaks in pump manifold, rust around pump;
compartments will leak and will allow moisture and dirt in compartments. Additional
upgrades will cost upwards of $50,000.00 to get it to a state of operational readiness
10'7
Paris Fire Department Pumper Purchase Historv from 1911-2011
~ ~ ~~~d%// % ~~d/%/G/i~~i ~ y~ i , U/%//y/~%0////H!~~,, i /
i~~~~~
1911
Webb
750
UNK
$9,250
1916
Ford Model T
N/A
UNK
$825 (SB)
1918
REO
N/A
UNK
UNK (SB)
1920
ALF - 75 Comb.
N/A - 750
UNK
UNK
1920
ALF - 75 Trip.
750
UNK
UNK
1931
Mack
1,000
UNK
$13,100
1932
GMC
N/A - 200
4,400
$1,266.20 (SB)
1941
ALF
750
UNK
$8,035
1947
Seagrave - Trip.
750
UNK
$6,406
1947
Seagrave - Trip.
750
UNK
$6,406
1961
Ward LaFrance
750
UNK
$22,764
1968
Mack CF611
750
19,150
$27,000
1968
Mack CF611
750
19,150
$27,000
1978
Mack CF611
1000
28,000
$78,000
1990
Spartan/FMC
1500
28,000
$186,528
1996
Spartan/Quality
1500
38,000
$271,466
1998
Spartan/Quality
1500
38,000
$309,987
1998
Spartan/Quality
1500
38,000
$309,987
2011
?
?
?
~
Ladder, Quint, "City Service", Booster, Brush Units, Rescue and Specialty apparatus are not included in
this survey. Apparatus with a(SB) were shop built apparatus, built by PFD members. Some data
regarding the cost and GVW were unknown at the time this information was researched.
ALF - American LaFrance
Comb. - Combination Car (Hose Body and Chemical Tank)
Trip. - Triple Combination (Hose Body, Pump and Chemical Tank) or (Hose Body, Pump and Ladders)
1920 ALF - 75 Comb. - Pump installed in 1921.
1932 GMC - Pump installed in 1938.
M. Barbee 108 November 7, 2011