The URL can be used to link to this page

06 P&Z Report MINUTES SPECIAL JOINT MEETING CITY OF PARIS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION IN CONJUNCTION WITH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS CITY OF PARIS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF PARIS BUILDING AND STANDARDS COMMISSION HOLY CROSS EPISCOPAL CHURCH PARISH HALL 322 S. CHURCH STREET . PARIS, TEXAS SATURDAY, JUNE 19, 2004 9:45 O'CLOCK A.M. 1. No quorum present. A. The following members were present: Reeves Hayter Bobby Myers Carl Lucas Harrell Tippe~ B. The following members were absent: Brad Archer Benny Plata Barbara Forrest Marshall Kent Russell McCain MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JANUARY 3, 2005 The Planning and Zoning Commission met Monday, January 3, 2005,5:30, Lamar County Fairgrounds, Westside Building, 570 E. Center Street, Paris, Texas with the following members present: 1. Reeves Hayter 2. Cleveland Thomas 3. Bobby Myers 4. Barbara Forrest 5. Marshall Kent 6. Carl Lucas 7. Benny Plata 8. Brad Archer Lisa Wright, the Director of Community Development, was also present. 1. The meeting was called to order by Reeves Hayter at 5:30 p.m. 2. The minutes from the December 6, 2004 and December 13, 2004, meeting were approved with a motion by Bobby Myers, seconded by - Carl Lucas. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes and 0 nays. 3. Public Hearing to consider the petition of Brad Drake for a change in zoning from a Commercial District (C) to a Light Industrial District (LI) on Lot 27-A, City Block 251, being located at 205 Loop 286 NW. The public hearing was declared open. There was no one present to speak in favor of the petition. Irvin Simpson, 825 30th Street NE, stated that the only concern is drainage. Triple A's parking lot drains onto his property, but it was determined that Mr. Simpson's property is on the opposite side of the Loop from this, so this is not an issue. Mr. Simpson stated he did not have an opposition, then. There was no opposition, the public hearing was declared closed. Planning and Zoning Minutes January 3, 2005 Page 2 4. Consideration of and action on the petition of Brad Drake for a change in zoning from a Commercial District (C) to a Light Industrial District (LI) on Lot 27 -A, City Block 251, being located at 205 Loop 286 NW. Motion was made to table the petition by Bobby Myers, seconded by Cleveland Thomas. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes and 0 nays. 5. Public Hearing to consider the petition of Mitizi Rader for a change in zoning from an Agriculture District (A) to a One-Family Dwelling District No.2 (SF -2) on Part of the Wesley Askins Survey and Mathias Click Survey, being located south of FM 195 and west of 36th Street NE. The public hearing was declared open. There was no one present to speak in favor of the petition. Richard Grossnickle, 1815 34th Street NE, spoke in opposition to the petition stating his concern of privacy and intensity of traffic. Also, the litter on the street is bad. The property to the south was zoned Commercial but the owner bulldozed all the trees. With the trees down, the storage buildings could be clearly seen. He would like to see the trees north of him not taken down. He is also concerned about water drainage. He is not against progress. Shannon Pastenak stated that traffic is bad through there and there are small children in the area-where are the entrances and exits? There was no further opposition, the public hearing was declared closed. . Planning and Zoning Minutes January 3, 2005 Page 3 6. Consideration of and action on the petition of Mitizi Rader for a change in zoning from an Agriculture District (A) to a One-Family Dwelling District No.2 (SF -2) on Part of the Wesley Askins Survey and Mathias Click Survey, being located south of FM 195 and west of 36th Street NE. Motion was made to table the petition by Carl Lucas, seconded by Marshall Kent. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes and 0 nays. 7. Public Hearing to consider the petition of Lee Woodard for a change in zoning from aN eighborhood Service District (NS) to a Commercial District (C) on Lot 35-B, City Block 249, being located at 3025 Clarksville Street. The public hearing was declared open. Lee Woodard, 710 Hogans Bluff, spoke in favor of the petition stating that he did not realize that the property is zoned Neighborhood Service-he would like Commercial zoning on the property for future salability. There was no opposition, the public hearing was declared closed. 8. Consideration of and action on the petition of Lee Woodard for a change in zoning from a Neighborhood Service District (NS) to a Commercial District (C) on Lot 35-B, City Block 249, being located at 3025 Clarksville Street. Motion was made to approve by Benny Plata, seconded by Brad Archer. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes and 0 nays. 9. Discussion of and possible action on recommending an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to that particular area located 10. Planning and Zoning Minutes January 3, 2005 Page 4 south and east of Lake Crook Park, south and west of Campbell Soup's spray field, and north of Highway 79, to include portions of 18th Street NW, 19th Street NW, and Butler Street. This item was tabled at the December 6, 2004, meeting. Motion was made by Bobby Myers to remove item from the table, seconded by Cleveland Thomas. Motion failed with a vote of 4 ayes and 4 nays (Benny Plata, Brad Archer, Reeves Hayter, Carl Lucas voting against). Consideration of and action on establishing a schedule for amendments to the comprehensive plan. Reeves Hayter stated that scheduling would take at least 3 months. Plans were submitted by consultants several years ago. The consultants indicated long-term future growth and the long term has arrived. Mobile homes should be considered as well. Land use should be planning, not zoning. On the right hand of the map, several categories are listed. It should be studied and determined if that level of land use planning is wanted. Zoning has more levels than shown on the map. Reeves stated that this was thrown at the Commission last month without the ability to plan for it. Benny Plata asked if there should be a special meeting for this. Reeves Hayter stated that it would be a regular meeting but open. Carl Lucas stated that 3 meetings sounded reasonable. Reeves Hayter stated that it might take 3 meetings to get into a position to hear public input. Carl Lucas stated that he would like categories defined. Reeves Hayter stated that next month categories can be looked at on the side. Also, areas needing changing can be looked at as well as mobile home information from Lisa. 11. 12. Planning and Zoning Minutes January 3, 2005 Page 5 The following schedule was discussed: month 1 - recommend revisions to the land use categories; month 2 - recommend revisions to the map itself; month 3 - review manufactured home information and make necessary recommendations. Motion was made to adopt this schedule by Carl Lucas, seconded by Benny Plata. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes and 0 nays. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat, Pecan Place, Phase I. Motion was made to deny by Carl Lucas, seconded by Benny Plata. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ay.es and 0 nays. Consideration of and action on the Master Plat Pecan Place. Reeves Hayter opposed the preliminary plat in addition to other items. The 2 right angle curves represent a traffic hazard at 34th Street NE and 36th Street NE. Motion was made to deny by Benny Plata, seconded by Brad Archer. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes and 0 nays. 13. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat on Lots 5 and 6, Block A, of the Southwest Industrial Park #1, being located at 1810 Loop 286 SW. Motion made to approve by Benny Plata, seconded by Bobby Myers, subject to the City Engineer's Memo dated, January 3, 2005. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes and 0 nays. 14. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat on Lot 1, Block A, of the Ting Addition, being located at 3920 Lamar Avenue. Planning and Zoning Minutes January 3, 2005 Page 6 Motion made to approve by Benny Plata, seconded by Bobby Myers, subject to the City Engineer's Memo dated, January 3,2005, and with the owner's name corrected. Motion carried by a vote of8 ayes and 0 nays. 15. Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of Lots 10, 11, and 12- A, City Block 176, being located at 4513rd Street SW. The current zoning is Central Area (CA) and the plat should reflect that. It is okay to build residential in Central Area. Reeves Hayter stated that if zoning was changed to Single Family 2 then the plat would have to be denied because zoning has not been requested. Motion was made to approve by Carl Lucas, seconded by Bobby Myers, subject to the City Engineer's Memo dated, January 3, 2005, and subject to revising the plat to reflect the current zoning. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes and 0 nays. Meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lisa Wright, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Zoning Change Requests to be Presented at the February 7, 2005, Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the February 14, 2005, Meeting of the City Council of the City of Paris DATE: January 31,2005 The following zoning change requests will be presented at the February 7,2005, meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration: 1. Brad Drake is requesting that the property located on Lot 27-A, City Block 251, being number 205 Loop 286 N. W., be rezoned from a Commercial District (C) to a Light Industrial District (LI) for the purpose of constructing a commercial warehouse. The Comprehensive Plan recommends that property along the Loop located east of the railroad tracks, which is where this property is located, be zoned for retail/commercial use; however, it further recommends that the area immediately south of this property, which appears to include a portion of this property itself, and on the west side of the railroad tracks be zoned light industrial. /lw cc: City Attorney ZONING REQUEST? BRADD RAKE ..... ~86 NW. ---- ~ ~ LI ~~ ~ (49) c (52) -- SF-2 D OAK AVE -¡ I I I I I I . r I I . MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Planning and Z . Commission FROM: Shawn Napier, P . City Engineer DATE: February 7,2005 SUBJECT: Northwest Industrial Park Final Plat I have reviewed the fmal plat of the above referenced addition. It appears that the final plat complies with the City of Paris subdivision regulations with the following exception. 1. Show all of the adjacent property owners. 2. Label the point of beginning on the drawing. 3. There are ten minor discrepancies between the field notes and the drawing involving bearings, distances and curve data. 4. Label all of the 80 Right-of-Way widths as drainage and utility easements. 5. The owner shall erect a private street sign at the entrance of the development. 6. Show all of the off-site easements for drainage, water and sewer lines on the fmal plat. 7. The minimum finished floor elevations will be set and approved on individual site plans submitted to the Engineering Department. 8. The drainage channel on the East side of Block B, Lot 2 will have concrete drainage pipe installed when the lot on the East side of lot 2 is developed. Remove the permanent drainage easement form Lot 2 and the proposed off-site easement to the East of Lot 2. The property owners will perform any needed maintenance on the ditch. 9. Change the 10- foot x 10- foot easement on the Southwest comer of Block B, Lot 1 to a 25- foot x 25- foot utility easement for SBC and TXU Electric. 10. Add a 5-foot utility easement along all Loop 286 frontages and along 34th Street N.W. 11. Delete the 5-foot utility easement along the 80-foot drainage and utility easement within the subdivision. . 12. Submit a list of any deed restrictions for the subdivision. I recommend approval of the final plat upon completion of the above items. cc: Tony N. Williams, City Manager Larry W. Schenk, City Attorney Lisa Wright, Director of Community Development Kenneth Jones, P.E., R.P.L.S., Hayter Engineering, Inc. Gary Vest, Paris Economic Development Corporation MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Shawn Napier, .E City Enginee DATE: February 7, 2005 SUBJECT: Northwest Industrial Park Final Plat Please add a certificate of guarantee of workmanship and materials used in the construction and installation of water mains, sanitary sewer mains and street paving for a period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance of the final plat. The certificate shall be executed by the developer and owner or owners and by all other parties who have a mortgage or lien interest in the property or subdivision. !! l.æ ;~ I CI " ~ I ~ ~ ~' :. II I., I . " ", ,I I II I: J , ¡, iii it: I I . . ~ u I 1~ ", 'il 'I 'I 'I 'I " I I , J~ J~" I'" ~. J: I 1'; I ~I I J 11. 11, . '1' ..!. 11. J' II I' .. . . . . !f J::I . J J'. J: 1" lIt 'f""'" ~ t!IJJ..,1 !I" n III. II!! II :I"!! It. Ilk I. ! I~ II Hi" II d t f!IIII' n J; H 1 I it II 1 II ,n,. I'" = I = I . . . = .: U' I ï , , .. I = 'la' = II I' '1'. 'I, I I. 1111I ,,~ , , , , efrt I;.I~ if 'J I ! I~',. tit III 'J 'J !JI.."."o JI',O! U,'; II' I J't: 1111 J 'I: ~ ~ ~' H R8'r I~I' I J ft Ii f Ii d I I ¡ f ' 'J; . , , " f. . . . . k R' , It ;' ë ~ii ~ìJ " it ; : -. ~i; ~ii ,. ; ~!¡ I i I ill IIII ~ flL 1 1 1 n e 2i1 ~ : I," , tl !~ :1 ;! : : !! ~I fil ~ " !",I : ;t, : tIi : . ; a,! ¡In g ;j ~ ~ n IrJH it. = to.. tp 0" Iii . . :w 'o.. to.. ." : , . II" II ='; " II . II" .;.8 -; ,; ,; :¡ ... I'~f PJ I I J J~t J'~ Ji JI J J I,' J~t I~t Ii I J~t ~ :! ~ ,~. ! ! ! ! ~f 'III; ~ ~I ~I ." ~ . lIi,l It II if I e II II I II JJj J HJI J JJ Ji J¡ f ß D II Jj Ii IIIIIIH!!!!IIIIIIIIIII 11111111111 11111111111111 I:: J :11111 ............. ...'. ...... I I, . H ~~ ih ~ li~] :Ii I' ,I !r. .g I'll !I III I II II) & If ~ ~ ~ }¡ II I III II d~1 r ~ " I, III.! ~! I; III ¡II I ,....... " . .n. ; '.~".".... -.......... --"""."'-"... .. . ;.~mtL. ~~.. )~m ~~;m~ ~m mm;mm::. ~ ~~~~~ ....~.................. ...... ~.. ~.... ...........~ 00."" ~...~........... ."..,.......~~...,.....,_.: :"':~;._;'o.:..;,....,., ..;;:..;."..;,.. ! .~~...... ~Ò. n....... :00"".. :.... ~ ...~Ò Ò ò i ...:.: ~.... ~ ~ í í~ ~ ... ~. ~.. ~ -~,:""",:"";,-"""'.::...:...,,.,,.:;::....,.~:.q;,é::..""':': :.r~::: ~::::.:: : : : : ; :~~::~: ~~~~;:: ::~::::: ::::::::::::::::::: :~:: :..... ~ ~¡ I ~ I:: ;! I 8 I i ~~, illl~ illlla §I~~ ~II~":' i:ii L. -I ir'g. IL.-I ¡w§ I ( Q. ~ II: æ ... ~ ~CI) ~ In ~...III C QCIll~C !¡3i~ CI)""c::¡; 5~~8~ Q.t~~~ ... ~ I --+- I I I~ 1!1 APPENDIX C-ZONING ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 1710 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1122, PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON SEPrEMBER 10TH, 1945; AND AMENDING OR- DINANCE NO. 1409, PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 30TH; DAY OF JULY, 1957; BOTH BEINO ZONING ORDINANCES; DMD- ING THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS INTO 16 ZONING DIS'rRICTS; PROVIDING FOR A ZON- ING DISTRICT MAP; PROVIDING WHERE SAID MAPS SHALL BE KEPT AND MA1NTAINED; PROVIDING A METHOD OF DETERMINING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES; PRO- VIDING FOR ZONING IN NEWLY ANNEXED TERRITORY; REQUIRING THE RE-ZONING THEREOF BY. THE CITY COUNCIL; PROVID- ING FOR B1JILDING IN NEWLY ANNEXED TERRITORY; PROVIDING CHARTS SHOWING THE USE PERMITTED IN THE 16 ZONING DISTRICTS; PROVIDING FOR THE CLASSIFI- CATION OF NEW. AND UNLISTED USES; DE- FINING DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS NOTED IN lrSE REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR AND REGULATING A PLANNED DEVEL- OPMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING AREA REG- ULATIONS OF LOT, FRONT, SIDE AND REAR; PROVIDING OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REGULATIONS; FIXING A PARK- ING SPACE SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN NON- RESIDENTIAL USES; PROVIDING HEIGHT REGULATIONS FOR CERTAIN BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES IN THE VARIOUS ZONING DIS- TRICTS; PROVIDING FOR SPECIFIC USE PER- MITS FOR CERTAIN USES; PROVIDING FOR ACCESSORY BUILDING REGULATIONS; PRO- VIDING FOR SPECIAL AREA AND USE REGU- LATIONS; RE~COGNIZING NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES ANI1 RULES FOR THE REGUI~TION THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR NONCONFORMING USE TERMINATION AT THE END OF A DEFINITE PERIOD OF TIME; CREX-rING A BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND PROVIDING RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR ITS ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURE AND JURISDICTION AND POWERS; PROVIDING FOR APPEÄl,o TO COURT OF PROPER JURIS- DICTION FROM DECISIONS OF BOARD OF ADJUSTME~lT; SETTING FORTH THE RE- QUIREMEN,]~S OF A BUILDING SITE, AND Supp. No. 44 12 THE MANNER OF THEIR CREATION; PROVID- ING THAT NO PROPERTY SHALL BE PLAT- TED THAT HAS NOT BEEN PERMANENTLY ZONED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; SETTING UP RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY AND COMPLIANCE; PROVIDING FOR RULES.AND REGULATIONS FOR AMENDMENTS TO THIS ORDINANCE; SETrING OUT GENERAL DEFINITIONS OF CERTAIN TERMS USED IN THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF ANY SUM NOT EXCEEDING $200.00 FOR EACH VIOLA- TION, AND EACH DAY SAME CONTINUES TO BE A SEPARATE OFFENSE, ALSO PROVIDING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO PERSONS AFFECTED BY THE VIOLATION; PRESERVING RIGHTS IN ANY PENDING LITIGATION AND VIOLA- TIONS OF ANY EXIS~ING ORDINANCE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS: Section 1. Enacting Clause 1-100 That Ordinance No. 1122, passed by the City Council on September 10, 1945, and Ordinance No. 1409, passed by the City Council on the 30th day. of July, 1957, Zoning Ordinances, together with all amendments thereto, are hereby amended in their entirety to read as follows: Section 2. Purpose 2-100 The Zoning Regulations and Districts as herein established have been made in accordance with a Comprehensive Plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the City. They have been designed to lessen the congestion in. the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; to provide adequate light and air; to pre- vent the overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; to fa- cilitate the adequate provision of trans- portation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements. They have been made 'with reasonable consideration, among other things, for the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for 3033 Section 5. Zoning District Boundaries 5-100 The district boundary lines shown on the zoning district maps are usually along streets, alleys, property lines or exten- sions thereof. Where uncertainty exists as to the boundaries of districts as shown on the official zoning maps, the following' rules shall apply: 5-101 Boundaries indicated as approximately following the centerlines of streets, high- ways or alleys shall be construed to follow such centerlines. Boundaries indicated as approximately following platted lot lines shall be con- strued as following such lot lines. Boundaries indicated as approximately following city limits shall be construed as following city limits. Boundaries indicated as following rail- road lines shall be construed to be the centerline of the right-of-way or, if no centerline is established, the boundary shall be interpreted to . be midway be- tween the right-of-way lines. 5-102 5-103 5-104 ) .,- Supp. No. 44 APPENDIX C-ZONING ORDINANCE § 3034.1 I .I 5.105 5.106 5.107 5.108 APPENDIX C-ZONING ORDINANCE Boundaril~s indicated as following shore lines shall be construed to follow such shore lines, and in the event of change in the shore line shall be construed as moy. ing with the actual shore line; boundaries indicated as approximately following the centerline:~ of streams, rivers, lakes or other bodies of water shall be construed to fol. low such I:enterlines. Boundarif~s indicated as paranel to or ex- tensions of features indicated in 5-101 through 5.105 above shall be so construed. Distances not specifically indicated on the original z.:ming maps shall be determined by the sc~Lle of the map. Whenever any street, alley or other pub- lic way is vacated by official action of the City Coun.cil or whenever such area is franchised for building purposes, the zon- ing district line adjoining each side of such street, a11 ey or other public way shall be automatic:ally extended to the centerline of such v.3.cated street, alley or way and all area[s] so involved shall then and hence- forth be Elubject to all regulations of the extended districts. Where physical features on the ground are at variance with information shown on the official zoning district map or when there arises a question as to how or whether a parcel of property is zoned and such question I;:annot be resolved by the appli- cation of :3ubsections 5-101 through 5-107, the property shall be considered as Clas- sified etA't Agricultural District temporar- ily in ~ho same manner as provided for newly annexed territory and the issuance of a building permit and the determina- tion of pElrmanent zoning shall be in ac- . cordance with the provisions provided in Section 6 for temporarily zoned areas. Section 6. Temporary Zoning-Annexed Ter.. ritory 6-100 All territory hereafter annexed to the City of Paris shall be temporarily classified as A, Agricultural District, until permanent zoning is established by the City Council 6-101 3035 A6 of the City of Paris. The procedure for establishing permanen t zoning on annexed territory shall conforrn to the procedure estal1lished by law for -:.he adoption of orig- inal zoning regulatio.n 3. In an area temporar: Iy classified as A, Agricultural District: a. No perSon shall e),E~, construct or pro- ceed or continue \':ith the erection or construction of an)' building or struc- ture or add to any building or struc- ture or cause the $ame to be done in any. newly annex-:~d territory to the City of Paris witllout first applying for and obtaining El building permit or certificate of occupancy therefor from the Building Offici.ll or the City Coun- cil as may be required herein. b. No permit for thp construction of a building or use of land will be issued by the Building Official other than a permit which win allow the construc- tion of a building permitted in the A, Agricultural Distrj ct, unless and until such territory has been classified in a zoning district other than the A, Ag- ricultural District, by the City Coun- cil in the manner provided by law ex- cept as provided in 6-101c following. c. An application fol' a permit for any other use than that specified in Para- . graph b above shall be made to the Building Official of the City of Paris and by him referred to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consider- ation and recommendation to the City Council. The Planning and Zoning Commission in making its recommen- dation to the City Council concerning any such permit shall take into con- sideration the appropriate land use for the area and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the City of Paris. The City Council after receiving and re- viewing the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission may by majority vote authorize the issu- ance of a Building Permit or Cerlin- APPENDIX C-ZONING ORDINANCE §8 8-100 Section 8. Use of La:Qd and Buildings Land and buildings in each of the following classified districts may be used for any of the following listed. uses; but no land shall hereafter be used, and no building or structure shall hereafter be erected, altered or converted which is arranged or designed or used for other, than those uses specified for the district in which it is located as set forth by the following schedule: . LEGEND DesiE~ates use permitted in district indicated. D Desîi~ates use p~ohibited in district indicated. m Indicåtes use may be approved as Specific Use Permit (See Secti9n 12). Note: Symbols applicable to following Use Schedule Charts 8-101-8-108. .I Sd.d/lle of Uæ, One.F"mily Dwelling 0... tached One-Family Dwelling At. Ladled (1) 'I\t,'o-Fan1ily Dwelling Multiple-Family or Apa.rt- ment Buildin, Comnlunity Unit Develop- ment (2) Boardin¡houee Roomin,house Bed and BreaJd'ast HisturicaJ Residence (41) Modular Home Mobile Home Mobile Home Subdivision Mobile Home Park Supp. No. 44, Rev. 2 A MF ,If/' SF I 8F2 8F3 " I 11 HI PO PU ESS .NO. ; c: ~ ... {; ,S .2"!:: - - t c::! b"a ~ t:I a :,3::: ~(ì)O :s 'E: 1 a. I I ~ .i 't ...= t-) "1~'" ~,.. ~'E: ~~ ~~ ~~~] ~J ~~ P 0 NS OR c CA u ~ ~ i:b.t-:t':t' ~ J ] ~] I .Sf Ë~'i~¡IIIËIIoJ¡~J!-- !It ~-< ~ r::5 r! s r! ~ r: Š '~S ,Q,:[.r § ~ ,§ § ë i ~.AJAAAJAA~~~~ ~ ~ l~ c! ~ ð 8-101 PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL USES t> ~ :I ~ ~ 0 0 ; s S 3037 J Schtd,,, of VitI! Elec~ricaJ SubaLation Elec~ricaJ Transmission Line Fire Station Oal Transmission LIne land MnterillC Station. l.oc:al Utility Dis~ributioß Linel Public Utility InstaJlaU< III . Radio Ie Television or Micro- Wnvo Thwen Sewale Pumpilll St.aLio ¡ Sewage 'Inatme"t PI"n~ Railroad Tracks Ie Ri,hl.-or- WRy (13) Ttlepi}one Une " Exchu¡p (t-I) Wa~er Reservoir, Water Pumpin, Station" Wel Wat.er '!'reaLment Plant Public or Privata Utilitiols Unlisted alld SLorage Aulas and shops Accessory Buildin,. (161 Fann Accessory Buildin,r SilO, SpeciaJ Developmunt. Home Occupation. (16) Ofl'.Street. Parkin, luLeu- tlona) to Main Use Swlmminl Pool <PrivaLf) Servants, Watchman or Care- taker Quarters Conm¡unity Center, Pri"at.e (18) SiC"s, Church BulletJn Boards (19) Signs, Real Estate (20) Field Offices, <Temporal)') (21) OIT.Preu¡ises Consump~ion Sale or Wine, Beer orAle (Wine and Beer Ret.aü ~:ales Store) a. an acce'lOl')' use to ¡rocery 'tore (27) (Sec. 8-301a) Supp. No. 44, Rev. 2 APPENDIX C-ZONING ORDINANCE §8 A }IF I PU US Hoe }IF J SF' I SF 2 SF S 11' P 0 NS OR c CA LI HI PO . -!:> -!:> "- 1! i~ ~ ]~ i' ~ c: .a Þ Þ Þ.1i ~ " ~" Þ J J:.:::J:':::rt;:':::~:::~::::g.::: . '1 '1 "121S1-==1 ~IS ~~ ð~ F;cS ~cS =-IS ; e ~ ! - .:J.9 :8 0: ;: ì!] '"' l ~ ~~~ B~ð 1 :r! 1 ~ i 1-1 ~'.! I.§ j.i ð JJ~:!a:~~l~J:s~ ] :-- . i ... .. ~ .S I ¿ i'l 1 ~ Q; Q ~r)$ d ~ 8-103 UTILITY AND SERVICE USES s t ~ C ~ ~ 0 ,2 ~ == 8-104 ACCESSORY AND INCIDENTAL USES t ~ Q ~ . ~ 0 0 ; 3039 ScMdute of UK' MÛDeop-aph, StaLionel')' or Letter Shop MorW8I')' and Funeral P.rlor Omce., Proreuiona] a nd Ad. IDlnl,traUvt OfT.Premi... Con.umlUon Sale or All Alcoholic Biver- Rce., PeckaCt Store (a) (See. 8.301a) Private Club (17) Re.tauranL Wit.houL Drive.in Service Re.tauranL With DrivoJoin Service Retail Store. and Sho:18 oO'er- IDC Good, ror Sale (28) Sexually Oriented Bulne.... Studio ror Photoerapber, Mu- sician or Artist - SLuetio ror Radio or Televi.ion ) Bakel)' and Conrect.ione1'7 Commercial Whole..I.. Bot. tlln, Work. Billboard and Adverti ,inc Sign' (29) Buline.. Siena and P.)le Siena (30) BoUdin¡ Material SaI.. Cabinet or Upholster)' Shop Cleanin, and Dyeine Plant Commercial (31) Cleanin, Plant CarpeL and Ba.. (With Special Ellulpo menL) (31) Conb"actol"l Shop and Stor- ap Yard Commercial Amusemunl.8 (In. door) Commercial Amuaemllnl.8 (Outdoor) (32) " Supp. No. 45 .APPENDIX C-ZONING A S1'1 '" I ¡1' , S1" 8" 11' t .t> 1 :b Þ i Þ ~ ~ j J.r J f ~ J J.r if :l,r .1' ~ A~ & AJ JJ! ~~ I ,. 0 NS OR 8-107 COMMERCIAL & SERVICE USES 3041 ] i 1 ~ jj ] J s s s S c CA ~ ~ 18 1./ 11/ PO PU us HO. I i.1 .1 ~ 's"¡ ¡ Ii ð ""f oS ~ -. i ~ i 1 j ~] .§'~ ~ jJ ~J ~& ~1 i~ ~~ .. . . ~ I I ~ 0 t,) ~ == .~ . { ¡ .' . . .. .' ~ ~ Q ¡ 0 0 ~ æ .. . . APPENDIX C-ZONING 18 ) .It S" 81" SF 11' MF I MF . p 0 NS GR c Colt LJ HI PD PU £SS Hoe SCMduit of Ute, .t- .t- 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ i' ~ c:: r! ]! . ~.r~. f .~ l j 1 :! l :! l.~ :I.§ 1 ~ ~J ~ ~J ~J ~~ ~A I ~ IJ ~ 8-108 INDUSTRIAL USES ~ J ~ :a i ..i ;§ !] Ii .1 .1 f ,s'ä ii <:) ~Ilf ~j lip :z:J ~~ (1 ~~ ~~ Licht Manuracturin, .?roce... ea (36) A.phaJt Pavin, aatehin, Plan~ Concrete Producb Manurac- ture Concrete Batcbinr Plllnt Sand. Oravel or Stont Ex. tractåon Any Manwacturin,. J ndu.. triaJ or S&orap Procell. Not Prohibited by Law Ea:ept Tho.. Specifically M.:.tåoned in Section 12-1()()( 1) throUlh (36) Note. As permitted in designated zoning district classifications. (Ord. No. 2074, § 1, 3-13-72; Ord. No. 2075, § 2, 3-13-72; Ord. No. 2095, § 2, 6-12-72; Ord. No. 2110, § 9-11--72; Ord. No. 2559, § 1,3-9-81; Ord. No. 2566, §§ 1,2,4-13-81; Ord. No. 85-067, § la¡ 12-9-85; Ord. No. 89-005, § 1, 2-13-89; Ord. No. 89-031, § 1, 8-24-89; Ord. No. 90-014, § 1, 4-9-90; Ord. No. 95-021, § 1, 6-12-95; Ord. No. 98-037, § 1, 8-10-98; Ord. No. 2003-019, § 4, 5-8-03) . Temporary Plant by RelOlutfon or Board or Commi..ion.n t ~ Q ~ ~ 0 ¡ ~ == Supp. No. 45 3043 7.2. 1 Compatibility Criteria The following is a summary of the general criteria used in formulating the plan map. The Future Land Use section contains policies addressing location criteria. 1. If the parcel is vacant, is the vacant land adjacent to a use that would not be compatible or prevent reasonable future development of the property? . 2. Is the size of the vacant tract conducive to a single use or multiple uses? 3. Are natural barriers available to buffer incompatible uses? 4. Do the new or proposed uses meet goals or objectives established in this pIan or by other adopted studies? . 5. Do the proposed uses protect adjacent residential neighborhoods? 6. Do the proposed uses "fit" an established pattern or trend that is desirable? 7. Can the proposed uses be adequately served by public facilities/amenities? In order to apply these basic criteria, a parcel-by-parcel existing land use inventory was conducted and mapped by the Department of Commwrlty Development in 1995 to fully analyze and understand existing land use patterns in Irving. The existing land use was initially mapped to apply compatibility criteria and goals and objectives for the community. Since Irving is over two-thirds developed, it was important that the present character and development type be considered before identifying new land uses. 7.2.2 Land Use Categories Prior to preparing the future land use map, a list of land uses categories was formulated. These categories reflect uses grouped together that will generally be compatible with each other. They do not reflect the City's existing zoning district categories, but will be used as a guide to develop new zoning districts to assist in plan implementation. These categories are listed in Table 1 with ex- amples of the type of use or development associated with each. 7-4 C()lnprcltC'l:si'(le PlaT: . City of 11'Ving --------------------.-.... .~... TABLE 1 LAND USE CATEGORIES lAND USE CATEGORY RESIDENTIAL Slnale-~ detached, low density (1-5 dweJlbìg mdtslacre) SbWe-family attached, medium density (6-ft dwellbìgs units/acre) Two or three family residential (5-6 dwelliDg unitS/acre) Multi-family residential (12.20 dwelling UDits/aae) Mixed Density Residential (10-30 dwelling units/aae) Mobile home RElAII/OFFICE Retail Office COMMERCIAL light commercial Heavy commercial MIXED USE Urban Center District (High intensity) Entertainment District (High Intensity) /NSmlllIONAIlPUBliC OR SEMI-PUBliC INDUSTRIAL light Industrial Heavy Industrial Utilities PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Park or open space ColC course EXAMPLE SiDgIe-famDy house, patio home, semi-rural residence with crops or pastures Townhouse Duplex, tri-plex Apartment, condominium, four-plex Townhouses or multi-family units np to 30 dwelling units per aae Mobile home, mobile home and travel trailer park EstabUshments providing merchandise for retalJ sale, mall, shopping center, restaurant, grocery store, gas station, barbershop Professional or corporate office, medical or doctor's office, administrative office such as real estate or insurance, bank, or savings and loan. Low intensity office means 0.5 FAR or less, high Intensity means 2:1 FAR or greater. Warehouse or office warehouse, mini-warehouse, hotel, motel, stadium, equestrian center, automobile dealership, car repair, car rental, car wash, other wholesale uses but no outside storage Welding shops, auto body repair, cabinet shop, lumber yard, green house/nursery, motor fteipt terminal, bus station, airport, rãilroad station or switching yard, large equipment dealer, truck or trailer rental and sales, mobile home or reaeatlonal vehicle sales, vehicle dispatch, other uses requiring outside storage of large equipment Office, retail, entertainment or multi-famUy Office, retail or entertainment Including sports related events or activities School, university, day care, government office, hospital, nursing home, religious institutfon, cemetery, funeral home, public transportation facility Manufacturing, assembly or fabrication of products or parts, but generally not processedJrom raw materials Environmentally sensitive land uses, outside storage yard as a prim~ use gas and oil storage tanks, auto salvage, metal salvage, conaete 'batching, sand and gravel mining, land6l1 Substations, rights-of-way easement, major power transmission line, broadcasting tower or studio, water storage, pamp station City parks, private parks, greenbelts PubUc or private golf course, country club Comprehensive Piau City lJf Irving 7-5 . , Comprehensive Plan See 4 Search Site Mep http://www.fbgtx.orgleompplan/plan4.ht .. .......... ...... .. .. .. .. ... . ... ..... .... .. ....... . ';.i .. ... .... . . .... . ... . . ... ... ..... .... . . . . . . . . . . . , " , " .'. ' " ,- .. . ,.. ,. , " '. .' .' '.. ,..,'. '. . .. ... ,. . ,.,' " . ; ,\ .', CO111jJrehen.{)ive Plan ~S'Cec I'. .. ~ ,_._",.~.., .,.~.,....,."".,..~"..p,-,_._.,.,... "".,...,_..",,~~._.-,-,.~~» ...'W'.H'.',...._.-....... O' "..'..~ -_.._~---------_._..._.- ---- ----,--- ..-- -------.--,.- .------.-- -----. --. lof5 2/1/2005 2:45 PI Comprehensive Plan See 4 . ....... ... . .. OrvlolzJj¡önl Deplrtme.. .. . .'.. . .i.'. ..'..'.' .'..', .... .... .. . BoillÌl$ I Committees. : . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. ... . . Building , Develolnnent . . . .. .. . .. . .... .. ...... . . . .cityÖrdinån.:es . . ....... .. .... . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . Frequëntly Askê~ ~edions . . .. ... .. ... ..... . ... . . . . . .. . ... . . .... .... .. PoliceDepal'bD~nt~ . .. .... . . . . ... . .... ... . ...... .... . . ... BidsJ~roposals . . .............. . . . . . . . . ... . . . .. .... . ... ËinpïöyinentOpportunitie$.. . .. .. . ..... ..... . .. . . . . . . . .. . )Jtility~s .... . . .. ... ... . . .... :Recnati~n ... . . ... .. . ... . . . . . . . . .. Local~.eltlter .... Click here for some traditional German music while you brov.'Se! Can'/find what you are looldngfor? Search our site! ~ -- . .,. ...,.... ".- ',. ,. '::;:~-"~ ,.... 2 of5 http://www.fugtx.orgleompplan/plan4.ht IV. LAND USE LOCATION CRITERIA The follO\ving location criteria support the planning model and the policies in the Guidelines for Gro\\-1h Element. The location criteria are organized by land use type. These criteria are the basis for the development of the Future Land Use Map. Particular attention should be given to the design criteria for commercial development expressed here and in the policies in order to avoid unsightly strip commercial development and hazardous traffic conflictc;. The Future Land Use Map with the supporting analysis in this Comprehensive Plan provides the rational basis for establishing zoning districts. \Vhereas, the Comprehensive Plan provides the general guidelines for development patterns, the operative element is the zoning ordinance. Zoning is the most effective means of implementing the Future Land Use Map. RESlD ENTlAL The following categories of residential development define the accepted density ranges for those categories in Fredericksburg: 1. Low Density Re.ddential (~ 5.0 du/acre). The Low Density designation is designed to reflect the small town character of Fredericksburg and the 7,500-square-foot minimum lot size. Single family, detached homes typify this category. Duplexes or other multi-family dwelling units are not precluded, however, as long as the gross density is not over 5.0 dwelling units per acre. 2. jloderate Density Residential (5.0-14.52 du/acre). The Moderate Density designation is meant to accommodate duplexes, townhouses, condominiums, moderate-density apartments, and mobile home parks. 3. High Density Re.ddential (> 14.52-22.7 du/acre). This land use category covers the highest density multi-family dwellings. Low and moderate density residential development should be oriented toward the center of the neighborhood and away from major traffic arterials; the moderate density housing should be located at the edges of these residential areas. High density residential development should have direct access to collector streets or, as appropriate, minor arterials, and should be buffered from low and moderate density single family residences by fencing, setbacks, landscaping, and building orientation. Traffic generated by high density residential development should not be routed through low density residential areas. Different residential densities may abut one another as long as (a) a proper buffer is provided and (b) traffic generated by the higher density residential area is not routed through the lower density areas. Residential areas of all types should be adequately buffered from non-residential uses through the utilization of landscaping, height transitions, berms, fences, walls, or open space to mitigate potential adverse impacts. Schools and parks should be centrally locate~ within and easily accessible from the surrounding neighborhoods. PARKS AND RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE For a city the size of Fredericksburg, geographic criteria, land availability, and local financial capacity tend to override quantitative criteria for minimum acreage, service area, and population served. Within that context, Fredericksburg should have at least one community park for each geographic area roughly detemlined by major roadways and one park serving the entire city. Community and city parks are defined by the foUowing criteria based on locally determined standards and consistent with state and 2/1/2005 2:45 p~ " Comprehensive Plan Sec 4 http://www.fbgtx.org/comppIan/plan4.ht national standards: 1. Community Parks. Community parks should be 7 to 15 acres in size, should have a service area radius of approximately a half mile, and should be developed in locations that do not require the crossing of a major highway for access. Wherever possible, community parks should be located adjacent schools. Combined scbooVpark sites should be approximately 25 acres for an elementary school, 50 acres for a junior high school, and 75 acres for a high schooL 2. City Parks. A city park should be at least 25 acres in size, should serve the current and future needs of the entire city, and should be developed in a location accessible by major roadways. City parks in rural communities often double as regional parks within the county. COl\IMERCIAL 1. Celltral Business District. The Central Business District (CBD) is the historic, commercial, public, and tow'ist center of Fredericksburg. Its vitality is important to the vitality of Fredericksburg's business community as a whole. IDe most intensely used portion of the CBD was surveyed for a parking study. The area surveyed covers both sides of Austin, Main, and San Antonio Streets between \Vashington and Milam Streets. At the time that the survey was done (late 1995), there were approximately 315,000 square feet of gross leasable retail space in that area. The CBD continues to expand beyond that area from creek to creek. The concept of development in the CBD is summarized below (see policies l.mder Goals I and 2 in Chapter III, Guidelines for Gro'-\1h): a. All development in the CBD should have a strong street presence with buildings close to the sidewalk and parking in the rear. b. Landmarks at the historic edges of original Fredericksburg township should be preserved and enhanced as "points of an-ivai." c. For those lots in the CBD outside the historic district that do not lend themselves to porticoed sidewalks along the building fronts, the City's landscape and sign ordinances should continue to be implemented to maintain a street presence. d. Increased parking and pedestrian linkages should be incorporated into the CBD. 2. Shopping Centers. Other retail commercial centers should be 3 to 10 acres in size and should be located at the intersection of two arterial streets or an arterial and a major collector street to support adjacent neighborhoods. A supermarket will often anchor a neighborhood center at the larger end of the scale. Other stores might include a drug store, a book store, video store, music store, bakery, cafe, children's clothing and shoes, or gift boutiques. Such centers can approach the scale of a community center but lack the department or variety store anchor. At the other end of the scale, a neighborhood center 3 of5 2/1/2005 2:45 P .. :omprehensive Plan See 4 http://www.fbgtx.org!eompplan/plan4.ht might incJude a convenience store, a dry cleaners, video store, and other convenience goods and personal services. 3. Commercial Strips. Commercial strips that have extensive street fTontage, other than in the CBD, should be of sufficient depth to allow access to and egress ftom intersecting streets in order to minimize the number of driveways and to prevent the need for cars to back into traffic. Heavy commercial uses, such as machine shops and automobile repair shops, should be located on thoroughfares away from prime retail locations. They should be located adjacent to industrial areas unless there is a distinct relationship to other uses that demands proximity to those uses. A gas station, which may also include a convenience store, would be a heavy commercial use that could be located in a neighborhood or community shopping center. INDUSTRIAL All industry should take advantage of highway access as much as possible. Transition between industrial and nearby residential areas should be accomplished by the scaling down of activity within the industrial district through the use of screening, landscaping, preservation of natural open space, setbacks, and design compatibility, including consideration of building height, bulk, and lot coverage. IndustTial uses should minimize impacts on nearby or adjacent residential areas by avoiding the placement of loading zones, vehicle maintenance w.ens, and outside storage on the side of the residential areas. Truck tratnc should be routed to avoid residential areas as much as possible. Industrial and heavy commercial uses should not be located at the end of collector streets that serve or pass through residential areas. In the event that a truck route is built around Fredericksburg, land adjacent to it would be most suited to heavy commercial uses and industrial parks. FUTURE LAND USE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS The Future Land Use Map shows the desired and anticipated development pattern ",;thin the extent of the 1995 extraterritorial jurisdiction (Map IV -1). It reflects that fact that, although certain trends will prevail, those trends can be influenced through local actions. The residential land use requirements for approximately 7,000 additional people in the planning area, which extends beyond the 1995 ETJ, are approximately 1,000 acres and about 3,000 dwelling units by the year 2020. This projected growth is an increase of approximately 50 percent in the planning area and comparable to the amount of residential acreage cWTently inside the city limits. Although not all of this grO\vth will occur within the incorporated area, all of it will surely impact the City. Much more than the projected 1,000 acres ofresidcntial development are shown on the Future Land Use 1vIap in order to indicate where the potential growth areas are for the various land uses. This approach was taken show options for the housing market while trying to convey some sense of the extent of growth over the next 2S years. Parks are designated in accordance with the location criteria to serve the residential areas Wld to take advantage of floodplain open space and other environmentally constrained land as much as possible. In no way do park designations imply the taking of private property without just compensation. New parks can be obtained through the subdivision process. InfiH parks can be obtained through donations and acquisition. RetaiJ commercial development is designated in accordance with the location criteria to serve the residential development. Office is mixed with retail in the future land use designations; but the location 4 of5 2/1/2005 2:45 P. Comprehensive Plan Sec 4 http://www.fbgtx.orglcompplanlplan4.h criteria regarding the clustering of retail still apply and should be incorporated into the zoning ordinance. Industrial land use designations are ShO\o\-l1 consistent with the location criteria and are extensive enough to give maximum flexibility to the location of new industry and the expansion of existing industry in appropriate locations. NEIGHBORHOOD CONCEPT The neighborhood concept is the basis for the planning model presented in the Guidelines for Gro\\th Element. The follmyjng assumptions are reflected in the concept: 1. The grid street pattern is eilicient and should be continued in Fredericksburg but in the context of a functional hierarchy of local streets and thoroughtàres. 2. The future residential land use mix should be approximately the same as the existing mix. 3. Parks should be located geographically in accordance with the location criteria. 4. Office land uses are suitable uses on thoroughfares to separate retail development. 5. Industrial land uses should be separated from residential uses and should take advantage of major thoroughfares in accordance \-vith the location criteria. MAP IV-} FU'ruRE LAND USE Home I MeetinwNews I Building information I CitY Officials I Organization Boards/Committees I Tourism Info I Disclaimer I Utility Rates I City Ordinances I Bids/Proposals I Recreation I Employment I Maps I Local Weather I Appraisal Info -.-. --.---.--.------- ----..-----.------------ ----- - -..-.- -- -.----.-- .----..--.--. -_._-------- Contact Infonnation Telephone: General ]nfonnation, City Hall: Park: Golf: Landfill: 830-997- 7521 830-997-4202 830-997 -4010 830-997-3459 Fax: 830-997 -1861 Postal address: 126 W. Main St., Fredericksburg, TX 78624-3708 Electronic mail General Information Send mail to \Vebmaster with questions or comments about this web site. Last modified: January 11, 2005 Copyright C 1999: 2005: City of Fredericksburg, Texas .. 5 of5 2/1/2005 2:45 F