Loading...
08-A Atmos Deny Request DRAFT F:A TTORNEY\ORDWORK\CURRENT\ A TMOS - Model Ordinance Denying GRIP October 17,2005 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID- TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THE CITY OF PARIS, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID- TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE A TMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE CO MP ANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITI G A TI ON; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR A PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on or about September 17, 2005, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Paris ("City"), a request for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective November 19,2005; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Paris to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and T I WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified and unreasonable; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 and that its expenses are substantially below those on which the GUD No. 9400 rates it is charging were based; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS: Section 1. That the findings set out in the preamble to this ordinance are hereby in all things approved. Section 2. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unreasonable and is therefore denied in all respects. Section 3. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of a rate ordinance and the rate case filed at the Commission. Section 4. That the costs incurred by the City in reviewing the Company's GRIP request shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. Section 5. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the City's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. Section 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. Section 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard T. Reis, Atmos Energy Corporation, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75240, and to Geoffrey Gay, legal counsel to the coalition of cities, at Lloyd Gosselink, P.O. Box 1725, Austin, Texas 78767-1725. Section 8. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. T I DULY PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Paris, Texas, on this the 24th day of October, 2005. ATTEST: Curtis Fendley, Mayor Janice Ellis, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Larry W. Schenk, City Attorney T I .... (" MODEL STAFF REPORT ON A TMOS MID- TEX GRIP DENIAL ORDINANCE Purpose of the Ordinance: ". '" The law requires that a Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) surcharge request cannot become effective until sixty (60) days following a filing. The Company can set the "effective date" for any date after the 60th day. The effective date may be suspended by a city for 45 days. The ordinance denies the surcharge request on the grounds that it does not comply with the law and is not reasonable. What is GRIP: GRIP is piecemeal ratemaking and would be illegal under traditional ratemaking in the public interest. Atmos persuaded the legislature in 2003 to make an exception to the prohibition against piecemeal ratemaking to encourage increased investment in distribution pipe by allowing prompt recovery despite the possibility that increased revenues and declining costs would more than offset increased investment. The "compromise" that Atmos made in 2003 to get the statute changed was to permit cities an unlimited time for suspension and consideration. Atmos betrayed its "deal" and successfully persuaded the Legislature (or at least Representative "Buddy" West and Senator Kenneth Armbrister) to change the statute to allow only 45 days for . suspenSIon. NOTE: IF YOU HAVE ALREADY ADOPTED A SUSPENSION RESOLUTION, THIS DENIAL ORDINANCE NEEDS TO BE PASSED NO LATER THAN JANUARY 3, 2006. NOTE: IF YOU HAVE NOT ADOPTED A SUSPENSION RESOLUTION, IT IS CRITICAL THAT YOU PASS THE DENIAL ORDINANCE BEFORE NOVEMBER 19, 2005. Observations on the Filine: First, once the GRIP surcharge is in place, it is updated annually until the next general rate case; however, that next case can be delayed by the Company for more than five years. Second, while predicated as a surcharge to promptly recover investment in new and replacement infrastructure designed to improve system safety and reliability, a substantial portion of this GRIP request is based upon new office furniture, computers and other cost efficiency measures more likely to benefit shareholders than ratepayers. Ex lanation of "Be It Resolved" Para ra hs: 1. This paragraph simply sets out the finding that the Company's request is unreasonable. ~ ~ " 1668\ 13\sent to cities\othO51 0 14 1 T I '" ,. 2. This paragraph authorizes participation in a Steering Coffimittee and coordinated control over legal counsel and consultants. 3. This paragraph notifies the Company that the City expects reimbursement of its __~xpenses associated with its review of the filing. 4. This paragraph authorizes the City to intervene in the Company's appeal of the ordinance to the Railroad Commission. 5. This paragraph provides for an immediate effective date. 6. This paragraph cites conformance with the open meetings act.. . 7. This paragraph directs that a copy of the signed ordinance be sent to a representative of the Company and a representative of the coalition of cities. ~ ¡ " 1 668\13\sent to cities\othO51O14 2 T I