10-H PEDC (8/20/03)MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PARIS ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
August 20, 2003
The Paris Economic Development Corporation met in regular session on
Wednesday, August 20, 2003, 4:00 P.M., at Paris Junior College, Bobby R.
Walters Applied Technology Building, Room 1206, 2400 Clarksville Street.
President Mike Dunn called the meeting to order with the following Directors
present: Dick Severson, Sims Norment, and Rodney Bass. Also present were
Executive Director Gary Vest, Ex-officio Member Bobby Walters, Pam Anglin,
City Manager Michael E. Malone, City Attorney Larry W. Schenk, and City
Clerk Mattie Cunningham.
Vice President Dunn called for the approval of the minutes from the previous
meetings of July 9, and July 23, 2003. A motion was made by Director Bass,
seconded by Director Severson, for approval of the minutes as presented. The
motion carried unanimously.
Vice President Dunn called for the finance report.
City Manager Malone advised that the Director of Finance, Gene Anderson, was
not able to attend the meeting and he passed out the financial reports. City
Manager Malone said that the Cash & Investments on hand as of July 1, 2003,
totaled $375,877.62; the Debt Reserve and Debt I&S Cash & Investments on
hand on July 1, 2003, totaled $936,244.47, for a grand total of $1,312,222.09.
City Manager Malone pointed out that the Sales Tax totaled $76,369.23. He
called the Board's attention to the Cash & Investments On Hand as of July 31,
2003, which was $1,396,306.96 with the Debt Reserve & Debt I&S Cash &
Investments On Hand as of July 31, 2003, of $936,451.51 for a total of
$2,332,758.47.
A motion was made by Director Severson, seconded by Director Bass, for
approval of the financial report. The motion carried unanimously.
Vice President Dunn called for the Director's report.
Gary Vest advised that they were still working on the Greenball Corporation,
Regular Meeting of the PEDC
August 20, 2003
Page 2
which is a distribution center that they were looking at. Chris Ty, who is the
Chairman of the Board for Twan, was supposed to be here this month but had
to cancel. He said they were looking at the Paris Industrial Park to build, so it
is still a live project. Mr. Vest said they were trying to reschedule Mr. Ty to
come the month of September.
Mr. Vest said they had a company that just dropped in on them, they will not tell
who they are, but they make concrete products. He said they were working with
them trying to help them find a site to locate their plant. There would be about
20 employees. They would need approximately 5 to 20 acres.
Mr. Vest said they are still working with several companies, such as Ctech, who
want to build in the Industrial Park. Mr. Coney is trying to decide which site he
wants and he has committed to that. He advised that they had two local
companies working to purchase property in the Industrial Park.
Mr. Vest said the Oliver Rubber Plant is still alive with Jackson Products. They
are still talking and are trying to get the price down. He feels that the bottom line
is that PEDC might have to get involved and help close that deaL Mr. Vest
advised that this is a sister company of Flex-O-Lite and they would be supplying
the Jackson Company with raw material. They were making the reflective tape
that is used on highway construction. Director Bass asked if the PEDC was to
chip in some money, would there be an agreement. Mr. Vest said there would
certainly be an agreement.
Mr. Vest informed the Board that they have hired Reeves Hayter to design Hearne
Street and he is just about finished with it. Mr. Hayter feels he will be finished
with the plans and ready to go out for bids in the next two weeks. Mr. Vest said
they plan, as soon as he is through with the plans, to put it out for bids and see
what kind of contract they can get on the street.
Mr. Vest and Eric met with Steve Matney with Special Products. Mr. Vest
advised that he has an office in Paris and he is trying to move their production
here, which would be 20 plus employees. They have worked with Steve along
Regular Meeting of the PEDC
August 20, 2003
Page 3
with the CEO of the company several times. It is a small operation, but it would
be good to have those jobs. He is looking at temporary facilities where he can
operate and maybe build in the Industrial Park in a year or two. Mr. Vest advised
that they make audio microphones and their largest product at this time is a
waterproof microphone.
Mr. Vest advised the Board that on September 24th through the 26th they will be
going to the TEDC meeting and he had furnished copies of the agenda to the
Board. This is their annual meeting where they have full-blown programs and
speakers. He invited the Board members to attend if they would like to attend.
Mr. Vest said that he and Vice President Dunn had talked about the PEDC Board
visiting Campbell Soup and touring their facilities and to see if they could set
something up in the near future. Mr. Vest said they were working with Campbell
Soup with an expansion.
Mr. Vest advised that they do have the plans for the Industrial Park and he had
spent a large part of today with the engineers. Don Wall, Barney Bray, and
Shawn Napier were all involved in that meeting.
Mr. Vest said everything is moving really good on Ctech and they have received
a certification from one of their executives. He reported that Erik goes out there
pretty regularly to check on them to see what is going on.
Mr. Vest told the Board that the Northeast Texas Economic Development District
through the Ark-Tex COG tries to help communities get economic development.
They have a CDC Development Corporation along with a loan pool and Mr.
Malone has served on the Loan Board. The County Judge has asked the PEDC
to appoint four people from Paris to that Board. He got with the Judge and also
talked with Jerry Sparks with the Council of Governments and the four
appointments that the County Judge is going to make are Gary Vest, Lindsey
Johnson, the new Main Street Director, Richard Manning, who was on the City
Council and is staying involved in local activities, and Kenneth Webb with Paris
Junior College.
Regular Meeting of the PEDC
August 20, 2003
Page 4
At this time, the Board Members reviewed the Plans and Specifications for the
Paris Industrial Park.
Resolution No. 203-013, resolving that the Board of Directors of the Paris
Economic Development Corporation approving the Plans and Specifications
pending the changes as specified by the City Engineer for the Paris Business Park;
authorizing the advertisement for bids and said construction, was presented.
A motion was made by Director Bass, seconded by Director Severson, for
approval of the resolution. The motion carried unanimously.
Vice President Dunn called for consideration of and possible direction to staff
regarding the following:
A. Development Covenants for the Paris Business Park.
B. Bylaws for the Paris Business Park Property Owners' Association.
C. Structure of the Paris Business Park Property Owners' Association.
Mr. Vest said the Board had discussed the Covenants several months ago and at
that time City Attorney Schenk had made several recommendations for changes
to the Covenants. He said they made all the changes that the City Attorney
Schenk had presented. The only thing that is still up in the air about these
covenants is, do they want to have this just as a property owner's association, or
do they want to incorporate and make it a nonprofit corporation. Mr. Vest said
there are pros and cons either way and he was looking for directions from the
Board.
City Attorney Schenk said he was more familiar with the Homeowners'
Association, which is very similar. He said most of those are incorporated as
a nonprofit corporation, primarily, for the purpose of liability protection, and it
is not all that expensive in that form. The draft bylaws are in a form that you
can convert into a corporation. He said all that would be needed is a set of
articles. City Attorney Schenk discussed corporations and associations and
stated that he did not know much about the tax implications and whether to
Regular Meeting of the PEDC
August 20, 2003
Page 5
incorporate as a nonprofit or not. He said the nonprofit status as a corporate
entity would support protection from liability. He said, whether that was an
important factor or not, this entity itself is a corporation, but ultimately all the
lots are supposed to be sold or used. He said it seems if it was an incorporated
entity, it might have a little more substance because what you want it to do is,
you want it to succeed as much as the Industrial Park because that is who will
be responsible for maintaining the common areas and streets. Mr. Vest said
once all the lots are sold, they will be out of the picture, and the covenants
address that. When the property is sold, the Corporation will be in full
control.
Mr. Vest said he had talked to a person at Adams and they said their experience
was one hundred percent with associations. He also talked with Jim
Shackerford and his experience was with associations. Mr. Vest said he had
checked some of the neighboring cities and they have gone with associations.
According to Gary, Mr. Shackerford says when your organization is an
association they can always incorporate at any time, and this may be the easiest
way to do it.
City Attorney Schenk said the only thing he was concerned about was that the
ownership of the property needs to be legally recognized in the corporate
association.
Mr. Vest said there is one thing which is a loose end and that is the fact that
PEDC does not own this property. This property belongs to the Paris Industrial
Foundation. The PEDC needs to get with the Paris Industrial Foundation, and
the intent all along was that they would eventually transfer the property to the
PEDC, but right now they do not own the property. Mr. Vest said before they
put out any bids on construction, which should be in two weeks, they are going
to have a meeting with the Paris Industrial Foundation and take that action. City
Attorney Schenk said that if you don't own the property, then you cannot place
covenants on the property.
It was the consensus of the Board to call that group together and get this matter
Regular Meeting of the PEDC
August 20, 2003
Page 6
settled.
Director Norment stated that he is not advocating that they do not need an
association or a corporation, but what is going to be the primary purpose of
either one of these entities that can't be handled with deed restrictions and
zoning. He questioned the purpose of the association or the corporation.
Mr. Vest explained that it is because of the common area and the maintenance
of it. The City Attorney advised that this is a form of a vehicle of transition of
ownership from the PEDC to the owners of the property. They need to create
it, keep it up for a while until there are enough lots sold,and it is self sustaining,
then it shifts to them and becomes their responsibility and the PEDC is out of
the picture.
Mr. Vest said normally a developer comes in and they will do a residential
development. Most of the time they want to deed the streets back over to the
city once it is built. He said he did not think the city is real crazy about having
those, but that normally is the way it goes. He said they have a lot of common
area like this retention pond that is going to have to be maintained and these
covenants will assure that common area will be taken care of.
City Attorney Schenk said if the Board went strictly with an association they
would have to change back some of the language that they currently have in it
to make it a corporation, but it would not be all that difficult.
Mr. Vest pointed out that in the Bylaws all the changes were shaded.
City Attorney Schenk referred to "Article I- Officers" of the introductory
paragraph, the last sentence where it talks about the Board of Directors shall
have full authority to remove from office any officer of the Corporation by the
vote of a majority of the members of the entire Association. He suggested
restoring the language that he had before, which was reference to the Board, and
to add some additional language about the issue of the membership having
rights to remove, and change the word Association to Board. The City Attorney
Regular Meeting of the PEDC
August 20, 2003
Page 7
said he had language to add at the end that says alternately the members of the
Association shall have authority to remove from office any officer of the
Corporation, but only in a regular or special called meeting with the membership
and only upon a majority vote of the members of the entire Association.
City Attorney Schenk discussed another proposed change in "Article IP'of the
Covenants, Section I, about appointing an arbitrator. He said that where it says
no engineer is acceptable to both or if either party is aggrieved by the decision
of the engineer then he will go back and put in the language that they had about
the American Arbitration Association because adding the cost language at the
ends clears the problem that he had with the sentences that they added after that.
City Attorney Schenk said the only other concern he had was a reference in there
to community building lots, and he has never found a definition of those. He
said the first reference he had was Article VII, Section 1 of the Covenants, and
in Article XIII, there is a reference to "a Community Building Lot deed shall
contain special provisions for participation in the Association notwithstanding
any provision of this declaration to the contrary." City Attorney Schenk said he
did not know what community building lots are. Mr. Vest said if it is something
that needs to be in there, they need to add it to the definitions. City Attorney
Schenk said the remaining items of concern are just minor things that can be
fixed and that he may take community lots completely out of the covenants
unless they can find some overriding reason why they should be retained. The
Board was in agreement with that.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
MIKE DUNN, VICE PRESIDENT
ATTEST:
Regular Meeting of the PEDC
August 20, 2003
Page 8
MATTIE CUNNINGHAM, CITY CLERK