05-E Campbell Soup Contract
DRAFT
F:\Attorney\ALICE\RESWORK\CURRENT\Campbell Soup Contract - Draft 1.wpd
April 8, 2004
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS,
PARIS, TEXAS, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO A WATER
PURCHASE CONTRACT WITH CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY;
MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE
SUBJECT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS,
Section 34-22(a) of Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Paris,
Texas, specifies that charges for water furnished by the City to certain high volume water users
pursuant to a written contract shall be as established in said contract rather than as established in the
City’s Code of Ordinances; and,
WHEREAS,
Campbell Soup Company has, for an extensive number of years, purchased the
high volumes of water necessary to run its processes by and through a written water contract with
the City of Paris; and,
WHEREAS,
the City and Campbell Soup Company have completed negotiation of a new
water contract to establish the rates, terms, and conditions for the future sale of water to Campbell
Soup Company; and,
WHEREAS,
the proposed new water purchase contract allows Campbell Soup Company to
establish its anticipated maximum daily demand for water use, thereby affording the company the
opportunity to establish its water demands in a manner best suiting the operations of its facility in
Paris, Texas; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Paris and Campbell Soup Company desire to
establish methodology in the new water purchase contract that would allow the company to maximize
the efficient use of water relative to the rate charged for such water; and
WHEREAS,
the City Council finds and determines that the proposed new water purchase
NOW, THEREFORE,
contract is in the best interest of the City of Paris;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS,
TEXAS:
Section 1.
That the findings set out in the preamble to this resolution are hereby in all things
approved.
Section 2.
That the Mayor shall be and is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk to
attest to a new water purchase contract by and between the City of Paris and Campbell Soup
Company, a copy of which is attached hereto and for all purposes incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
Section 3.
That this resolution shall be effective from and after its date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED
this 12th day of April, 2004.
____________________________________
Curtis Fendley, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Mattie Cunningham, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
Larry W. Schenk, City Attorney
WATER PURCHASE CONTRACT
STATE OF TEXAS
§
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF LAMAR
§
This Agreement, made and entered into this - day of
, 2004, and executed in
quintuple originals, each executed copy constituting an original, by and between the City of Paris, a
municipal corporation of Lamar County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and Campbell Soup
Company, a New Jersey corporation, with a plant located in Paris, Lamar County, Texas, hereinafter called
CAMPBELL.
WITNESSETH:
I. Service To Be Furnished
1.1 The CITY agrees to furnish and CAMPBELL agrees to purchase and take a supply of water in
accordance with the terms and conditions hereof. Said supply of water shall be taken through the existing
service by means of an 18 inch Foxboro magnetic flow tube 8300 Series, Model No. 8318-SEBA-ASJ-
GCGZ, Reference No. 94281312 (or such other similar metering device as shall be appropriate for accurate
measurement of the flow), and an 18 inch Foxboro magnetic flow tube M/2800 Series, Model No. 2818
SEA- TSA-G STB, Reference No. 5498649 CS-2/FN-F (or such other similar metering device as shall be
appropriate for accurate measurement of the flow), connected to the CITY's 30 inch potable water
transmission line approximately I mile North of CITY's Ground Storage and Booster pumping facility.
Should the need arise to replace either meter herein described, it is agreed that such may be so replaced
without amendment to this Agreement by giving notice of the name and number ofthe new meter as herein
provided.
Water Purchase Contract - Page I
1.2 The potable water furnished shall be used exclusively for the operation of CAMPBELL's
manufacturing plant on the North side of Loop 286 N.W. within the corporate limits of the City of Paris.
II. Quantities To Be Furnished
2.1 The average daily supply of water furnished shall meet all reasonable requirements of
CAMPBELL, subject to such limitations and rates as are stated herein. The average monthly consumption,
at this time, is in excess of eleven (II) million cubic feet. The water delivered to CAMPBELL shall be at
a minimum pressure of seventy-five (75) pounds per square inch; the cost of delivering such pressure is
included in the rate established in Article VII. In no instance shall CAMPBELL require delivery of water
under this Agreement in an amount exceeding 8 million gallons per day, or at a rate exceeding 6000 gallons
per minute.
2.2 CAMPBELL will advise the CITY in advance in writing a minimum of sixty (60) days prior to
the implementation of any planned changes that would significantly affect the amount of water used by
CAMPBELL for any extended period of time. For the purpose ofthis Agreement, a significant effect would
be a change that would cause or contribute to Campbell's water consumption varying by 10% or more on
an average daily basis. For any changes such as these, the CITY will maintain the right to limit any
increase in water sold to CAMPBELL if it would adversely impact the integrity of the CITY's water
system. The CITY would then work with CAMPBELL, in good faith, to meet CAMPBELL's water needs.
III. Rel!ulations
3.1 CAMPBELL may not permit any water furnished hereunder to be used to supply any other party
without specific written approval of the City Council of the CITY. This shall not apply to emergency
service provided to other CITY water users.
IV. Ril!hts
4.1 The CITY reserves the right to inspect, test, repair and replace the water meter( s) used to measure
Water Purchase Contract - Page 2
CAMPBELL's water consumption as required. Such replacement, calibration or repair shall be paid one
half by CITY and one half by CAMPBELL.
4.2 The CITY and CAMPBELL each reserve the right, either in law or in equity, by suits, mandamus
or other proceeding, to enforce or eompel performance of any or aH covenants herein contained.
V. Water aualitv
5.1 The CITY shaH supply CAMPBELL with water of quality equal to or exceeding the State of
Texas drinking water quality requirements for drinking water supplied for pu(blic areas.
5.2 The CITY shaH supply monthly, if requested by CAMPBELL, a wat+r quality analysis report of
the water supplied to CAMPBELL. CAMPBELL may request the report moreiJTequently, but will pay the
cost of analysis for any additional reports generated in excess of one per motith.
5.3 The CITY bears no degree of responsibility for the water quality at anr point beyond the meter( s)
used to register CAMPBELL's water consumption. CAMPBELL bears the re ponsibility for maintaining
the water quality at any point beyond the meter( s) vault and within CAMPB LL's distribution system.
5.4 CAMPBELL shaH notify and keep the CITY informed of persons r sponsible for the integrity
of CAMPBELL's distribution system.
5.5 Each ofthe parties shall immediately notify the other party's CityM ager or Plant Manager, or
such manager's designee, as the case may be, of any emergency or condition vvjhich may affeet the quality
or quantity of water in either party's system.
5.6 The CITY reserves the right to make inspections ofthose facilities îhiCh may affect the quality
of the water supplied to CAMPBELL and perform required tests.
VI. Equipment and Operation
,
6.1 CAMPBELL shaH provide and maintain aHlines and valves on C~PBELL's side ofthe water
meter(s) used to register CAMPBELL's water consumption, which meter(s) mFks the limit ofthe CITY's
Water Purchase Contract - Page 3
responsibility for maintenance. CAMPBELL shall maintain at all times, in working order, a valve
immediately upon CAMPBELL's side of the meter(s), which valve can be usfjd for protecting the CITY's
system trom contamination in the event of CAMPBELL's system becoming cqntaminated, or in the event
the integrity of CAMPBELL's system is violated. CAMPBELL's valve may be used by the CITY to proteet
CAMPBELL's system or to facilitate repair of CITY's system.
6.2 The CITY's representative will inspect monthly the meter(s) measuring the supply of water
furnished to CAMPBELL, and will report when the same is known or suspected to be registering
incorrectly. The meter(s) shall be repaired by a service representative certified to work on the meter(s)
being repaired. In the event the meter(s) must be replaced, CITY and CAMPBELL will agree upon a (the)
replacement meter(s) and the method ofreplacement.
6.3 The CITY's representative assisted by a service representative certified to work on the meter(s)
being repaired, will during each calendar year, and at least quarterly, (with Jarruary, February and March
comprising the first quarter, and every three months thereafter comprising a qu¡uter), test the accuracy and
performance of each meter and will calibrate the meters measuring CAMPBEtL's consumption, to verify
I
their accuracy. The trequency oftesting may be reduced by mutual agreeme,* if meter aecuracy appears
to be constant. The CITY may, at its discretion, choose to calibrate the m~ter(s) more frequently, if
conditions so warrant. The cost ofthe calibration will be distributed in accordtnce with paragraph 4.1. A
representative of CAMPBELL will be notified in advance of any testing andlot calibration and shall have
the right to witness any such testing. All testing will be performed by a factory representative or mutually
agreed upon testing service.
6.4 When it is determined that a water meter has registered incorrectly, am estimate of the amount of
water furnished through the faulty meter shall be prepared by CITY's Director IOfFinance for the purpose
of billing or crediting CAMPBELL. The estimate shall be based upon the ave~age of correct readings for
Water Purchase Contract - Page 4
the same or equivalent months in the preceding three (3) years, or if available and in lieu of said three (3)
year average, based on such other method which would more accurately reflect the actual consumption for
the period in which the meter failure occurred as mutually agreed upon by the City Manager and Plant
Manager of the respective parties.
6.5 For the meter(s) to be determined as "registering incorrectly," the meter(s) must be found to be
in error by plus or minus 2.5%, or greater. If the degree of error is plus or minus 2.5%, or greater, then the
estimated amount of water furnished to CAMPBELL will be calculated as, stated in the immediately
preceding paragraph.
VII. Rates
7.1 For purposes of billing under this Agreement, a day shall be that period of time beginning at
12:00 midnight and continuing through II :59 p.m.
7.2 CAMPBELL will be charged a two-part rate based on CAMPBELL's¡treated water consumption
and Maximum Day Demand.
7.3 Charges for treated water furnished to CAMPBELL during the Initial Period of this Agreement
shall be ftom the date of execution through May 31, 2004 and have been computed as follows:
7.3. I An annual demand charge per million gallons per day (MGD) of Maximum Day Demand of
water delivered to CAMPBELL shall be $72,000 per MGD.
7.3.2
The volumetric charge shall be $0.45 per 100 cubic foot of trfated water withdrawn by
CAMPBELL ftom the CITY's water utility system.
7.4 For the Initial Period, CAMBELL's Maximum Day Demand shall b~ established at 6.0 MGD.
7.5 Each twelve (12) month period following the Initial Period, beginning June I and ending May
31 of the following year, shall be defined as a "Rate Year."
7.6 For cost of service studies following the Initial Period, and except for data associated with the
Water Purchase Contract - Page 5
Maximum Day Demand, historical data accumulated during each twelve-month period ending September
30 of the prior year, hereafter referred to as the "Test Year," shall be used.
7.7 Prior to the end ofthe Initial Period, a detailed Cost of Service Stupy will be perfonned by an
independent utility rate consultant chosen by the CITY, such study to be perfortned in accordance with the
methodology described in that excerpted portion of the Reed, Stowe & Yank~, LLC study, March, 2003,
attached as Exhibit I. The Cost of Service Study shall be developed on an aclual historical cost test year
basis (for the Test Year) allowing for reasonable and necessary expenses ofp~oviding such water service
and allowing for known and measurable adjustments, including satisfying tire City's obligations under
current and future bond covenants. Thereafter, on an annual cycle, a detailed çost of Service Study shall
be perfonned by an independent rate consultant chosen by the CITY, again u$ing the same methodology
as the excerpted portion of the Study in Exhibit I, unless and until a differe~ methodology is mutually
agreed upon in writing by CAMPBELL and the CITY. CAMPBELL shall pay ~e cost of each annual Cost
of Service Study, payable within thirty (30) days of CAMPBELL's receipt offnvoice from the CITY.
7.8 During the Initial Period and any given Rate Year, should CAMPB~LL's actual Maximum Day
i
Demand exceed the Maximum Day Demand used in the most recent Cost oflservice Study, Campbell's
will be assessed an excess demand charge ofl.5 times the Annual Demand C~arge (per MGD) times the
Excess Demand. Payment of the Excess Demand Charge shall be due thirty PO) days within receipt of
I
invoice from the CITY. Beginning the month after this event, this event Wil~ also immediately change
CAMPBELL's current Maximum Day Demand and Monthly Demand Charg9 for this Agreement to the
new actual Maximum Day Demand and adjusted Monthly Demand Cha~e. AS AN EXAMPLE,
ADJUSTMENTS FOR AN INCREASE FROM A MAXIMUM DAY DEM ND OF 6.0 MGD TO A
MAXIMUM DA YDEMAND OF 6.5 MGD ARE CALCULATED IN THE EX PLE GIVEN BELOW.
Example:
Water Purchase Contract - Page 6
Maximum Day Demand
Annual Demand Charge (per MGD)
Total Initial Annual Demand Charge
($72,000 x 6 MGD)
Monthly Demand Charge ($432,000/12 months)
6MGD
$ 72,000
$432,000
$ 36,000
Actual demand recorded
Excess Demand (6.5 MGD - 6 MGD)
6.S MGD
MGD
Excess Demand Charge ($72,000 x 1.5 x 0.5 MGD Excess Demand)
Additional amount due CITY in thirty (30) days
$ 54.000
$ 54,000
Annual Demand Charge (Per MGD)
Adjusted Total Annual Demand Charge
($72,000 x 6.5 MGD)
Adjusted Monthly Demand Charge ($468,000/12 months)
$ 72,000
$468,000
$ 39,000
Should the new Maximum Day Demand again be exceeded durin a given Rate Year, similar
calculations and a designation of a new Maximum Day Demand for the Rat Year shall be made.
The highest Maximum Day Demand in a given Rate Year that exceeds he current Maximum Day
Demand shall be used as the Maximum Day Demand in the subsequent year's ost of service study, unless
a higher Maximum Day Demand is requested by CAMPBELL and accepted y the CITY.
Example:
Maximum Day Demand (initial estimate) 6. MGD
Maximum Day Demand (Actual) 6. MGD
Maximum Day Demand for subsequent cost of service study 6.5 MGD
If a higher Maximum Day Demand than actually experienced is requ ted by CAMPBELL, and
accepted by the CITY, CAMPBELL's Total Annual Demand Charge will be t e Annual Demand Charge
(per MGD), calculated using the actual Maximum Day Demand for the subse uent cost of service study,
times the requested Maximum Day Demand.
7.9 CAMPBELL's volumetric rate shall be based on CAMPBELL's t eated water consumption
during the twelve-month prior Billing Year, adjusted for any known and mea urable changes.
Water Purchase Contract - Page 7
7.10 The following example illustrates the calculation of CAMP BEL 's Annual Demand Charge
(per MGD) and volumetric rate under this Agreement.
Example:
CAMPBELL's Extra Capacity costs
CAMPBELL's Maximwn Day Demand (MGD)
CAMPBELL's Annual Demand Charge (per MGD)
$ 432,000
-;- 6.0
$ 72,000
CAMPBELL's Base and Customer costs
CAMPBELL's water consumption (CCF)
CAMPBELL's volumetric rate (per CCF)
$ 540,000
-;-1 00 000
$ 0.45
VIII, Payment of Chan!es
8.1 Rates under Article VII of this Agreement, for CAMPBELL's treate water consumption, shall
be billed by the CITY on a monthly basis with such billing being rendered on r about the same day each
month. CAMPBELL's monthly payment shall consist ofthe volwnetric charg for actual water taken plus
one-twelfth ofthe Annual Demand Charge, plus any additional amount due as alculated under Article VII
of this Agreement for an adjustment to the Maximwn Day Demand. In the e ent CAMPBELL sha1l fail
to make any payment required by this Agreement within twenty-one (21) day fo1lowing the bi1ling date,
the CITY may suspend water service authorized by the Agreement after prov ding CAMPBELL five (5)
working days written notice of its intention to suspend service. It is agree that this paragraph sha1l
supersede Sections 34-29 and 34-30 ofthe Code of Ordinances of the City of aris, to the extent that they
concern water service, as we1l as any other Code of Ordinance provisions wi h which it may conflict.
IX. Force Ma'eure and Contract Administrati n
9.1 It is agreed that in the event and to the extent that fire, explosion, ac ident, war, act of God or
the public enemy or any natural disaster prevents the performance of either p y hereto, such party shall
be relieved of the consequence thereof, and there sha1l be no liability fì r payment on the part of
CAMPBELL or for failure to deliver potable water on the part of the CITY, otwithstanding any other
Water Purchase Contract - Page 8
provision of the Agreement, so long as and to the extent that perfonnance s prevented by such cause;
provided, however, that the parties shaU use aU due diligence in their efforts t resume perfonuance at the
earliest practical time.
9.2 This Agreement shan be subject to and in an things governed by
icle Y, Chapter 34 of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Paris, dealing with Drought Continge cies, or any other similar
provisions as the same shan be adopted by the City dealing with water cons rvation, water curtailment,
or drought contingencies.
9.3 This Water Purchase Contract win replace in its entirety the Wate Purchase Contract dated
October I, 1993, entered into between the CITY and CAMPBELL, and this greement shan be in force
and effect for a period of three (3) years in addition to the Initial Period as def¡ ed in Paragraph 7.3 hereof,
ending May 31, 2007. Thereafter such Agreement shall be automaticany rene able for additional one (1)
year tenus, unless either party provides written notice to the other party 0 intent to negotiate a new
contract, such notice to be given at least ninety (90) days prior to the end da e of the then current tenu.
Thereafter, a new service contract will be negotiated, provided this Agreeme t shall remain in full force
and effect for a period not to exceed twelve (12) months or until a new contra t is negotiated, whichever
event occurs first. If a new contract is not negotiated as provided herein, the te charged for water shall
be as established in the CITY's current rate ordinance for non-residential cust mers.
9.4 No officer, official or agent ofthe CITY or CAMPBELL, has the p wer to amend, modify or
alter this Agreement or waive any of its conditions or to bind the CITY, or C MPBELL, by making any
promise or representation not contained herein.
9.5 This Agreement, except by operation of law, shall not be assigned or ransferred by either party,
without the prior written consent of the other party.
9.6 The CITY win not be responsible in damages for any interruption or tailure to supply water and
Water Purchase Contract - Page 9
I
shall be saved and held hannless from all damage of any kind, nature and destriPtion which may arise as
a result of making this Agreement and furnishing water hereunder, except Wh¡' re the CITY has the ability
to supply the water and refuses to do so or where the CITY has failed to abi e by any of its obligations
under this Agreement.
9.7 Any written notice required or pennitted under the tenus of the A~eement shall be given and
be deemed to have been duly served if either (I) delivered in person (including ~eputable overnight courier
service), or (2) deposited certified mail, return receipt requested, postage preP1d in the United States mail,
addressed to the designated representative of the respective parties which ar designated as follows:
Water Purchase Contract - Page 10
CAMPBELL
Vice President, Southwest Region
Campbell Soup Company
P. O. Box 116
Paris, IX 75461-0116
CITY
City Manager
City of Paris
P.O. Box 9037
Paris, IX 75461-9037
With a copy to:
Secretary
Campbell Soup Company
P. O. Box 391
Camden, New Jersey 08101
With a copy to:
City Clerk
City of Paris
P.O. Box 9037
Paris, TX 75461-9037
9.8 If any term or provision ofthis Agreement shall be declared unconsti tional or void by any court
of competent jurisdiction, the constitutionality and validity of the remainder f said Agreement shall not
be affected hereby, and to this end the terms and provisions of said Agreement re declared to be severable.
9.9 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed 0 create the relationship of
principal and agent, partnership, joint venture, landlord and tenant, or any elationship or association
whatsoever between CITY and CAMPBELL, other than as expressly set fort herein.
9.10 This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding between he parties, and any other
understandings or agreements shall be cancelled and superseded by this A eement upon the date of
execution hereof. None of the terms of this Agreement shall be waived, disc arged, altered or modified
in any respect, except by an agreement in writing signed by both parties and s ecifically referring to this
Agreement The captions in this Agreement are included for convenience onl and shall not be taken into
consideration in any construction or interpretation of this Agreement or an of its provisions.
This
Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with th laws of the State of Texas.
The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to, bind and inure to the benefit of the CITY and
CAMPBELL, and their respective successors, legal representatives and perm'tted assigns, if any.
Water Purchase Contract - Page 11
X. Authority to Contract
10.1 The parties recognize and agree that Section 34-2 of the Code of Or inances ofthe City of Paris
requires that consumers or purchasers desiring water at minimum delivery pr ssure, particular flow rate,
volume in excess of 1.5 million cubic feet per month, or which require constru tion of oversized additions
to the CITY's system, be delivered water pursuant to a written contract upon uch terms, conditions and
at such rate as may be fixed by the City Council of the City of Paris. This greement is such a written
CITY OF PARIS, PA
,2004.
contract.
EXECUTED by the City of Paris, Texas this - day of
Curtis Fendley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Mattie Cunningham, City Clerk
EXECUTED by Campbell Soup Company this ;).S day of
/YJ
C- f-
,2004.
~ C"".'BELL SOUP C MPANY
~ -i ¡:,. Ì)... -
. , Vice Pr sident - Mfg.,
Paris Operations
ATTEST:
, Secretary
Water Purchase Contract - Page 12
CITY OF
PARIS, TEXAS
-0
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER
COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN
REVISED DRAFT
MARCH 2003
EXHIBIT J:.
March II, 2003
Mr. Mike Malone
City Manager
City of Paris
135 First Street, S.E.
Paris, Texas 75460
Dear Mr. Malone:
The City of Paris ("City") engaged the services of Reed, Sto e & Yanke, LLC to
conduct a Cost of Service and Rate Design Study for the water and wastewater operations
of the City. The attached revised draft report presents our finding and recommendations
from the Cost of Service and Rate Design Study.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our professional serviceJto the City and would
like to express our sincere appreciation to you and your staff me bers for supplying the
needed infonnation and data to conduct the Cost of Service and ReDesign Study.
Should you, your staff, or council members require additional info ation or clarification
regarding the Cost of Service and Rate Design Study, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Jack E. Stowe, Jr. (512) 450-0991 or Mr. Darrell Cline at (214 448-9443.
Very truly yours,
Reed, Stowe & Yanke, LLC
Table of Contents
CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS
WATER AND WASTEWATER
COST OF SERVICE STUDY
I
. I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARy............................................................j........................1
CHOICE OF TEST YEAR AND ALLOCATION METHODOLOGy....J.,......................7
ANALYSIS OF TEST YEAR DATA .............................................j......................l1
CUSTOMER CLASS DISTRIBUTION FACTORS """""""""""""~1......................16
W ATERAND WASTEWATER UTILITY FINANCIAL OPERATIONi"....................l7
WATER UTILITY SYSTEM- FINANCIAL DATA ........................1......................20
REvIEW OF W ASTEWA TER SYSTEM DATA ..............................1......................22
I
VIII. DETERMINATION OF TEST YEAR REVENUE REQUIREMENT.....¡......................25
IX. RATE DESIGN.....................................................................""'1......................28
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDICIES I
APPENDIX A OPERATING CHARACTERISTICCS OF UTILI Iy SYSTEM
APPENDIX B CONTRACT CUSTOMERS ~
APPENDIXC DETERMINATION OF RETAIL WATERANDtASTEWATER
RATES I
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
REVISED DRAFT
I.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A.
Introduction
The City of Paris ("City") authorized Reed, Stowe & Yanke, LLC to perform a water and
wastewater cost of service study. This report describes the study performed for the City and
makes recommenda~ions with respect to rates to be charged to the City's water and wastewater
customers.
The report consists of nine sections, including the Exttcutive Summary section.
Also attached are three appendices to supplement the findings ofthe report.
Following the Executive Summary, Sections II through VI develop the methodology,
assumptions and the revenue requirement for the water utility portion of the City's Water and
Wastewater Utility. Sections VII and VIII develop the methodology, assumptions and the
revenue requirement for the wastewater utility portion of the City1s Water and Wastewater
Utility. Finally, Section IX of the report develops the rate schedules; for water and wastewater
services provided by the City.
The three appendices following the report consist of Appendix A, ope~ating characteristics of the
system, Appendix B, contract customers, and Appendix C the determination of the retail water
and wastewater rates.
B.
Findin!!s aeRate Study
a.
The total revenue requirement for the Water Utility portion of the test year for the
retail rate determination is estimated to be $6,451,618.
City of Paris. Te,as
Water and Wastewater Cas' of Service Study
Ma,.h 2003
REVISED DRAFT
b.
The total revenue requirement for the Wastewater Utility portion of the test year
is estimated to be $4,372,792.
c.
Since the 1999 study, total water consumption has fallen from 546 million cubic
feet to 498 million cubic feet in 2001, a 9% decrease. This decline is primarily a
result of a reduction in water purchases by Campbell Soup, as well as a decline in
wateryurchases by the Residential customer class.
d.
In 1998, the Residential wastewater winter average was 675 cubic feet. The
winter average for 2001 declined to 651 cubic feet, a 4% decrease.
e.
There appears to be a discrepancy between the City's residential water billings
and wastewater billings. The City uses the months of November, January and
February to calculate the residential wastewater winter average, which is used as
the maximum monthly volume ("cap") that can be billed a customer during the
following year. Generally, wastewater billings remain slightly below the winter
average during winter and spring months, however, as water consumption
increases during the summer and fall months, the wastewater billings approach
the winter average cap. The City's wastewater billing infonnation shows that the
wastewater billings have stayed well below the winter average (approximately
100 cubic feet on average). In fact, June 2001 had the lowest wastewater billings
for FY 2000/2001, even though it was the third highest month in water
consumption.
f.
Contract customers are estimated to produce the following revenues:
.
Campbell Soup
$1,211,691
.
Lamar County Water Supply District
$668,320
CityolParis. Texas
Waltr and Wastewater Cast olSe"ice Study
March 2003
2
REVISED DRAFT
. Tenaska III
$364,286
. Lamar Power
$275,791
. Marvin-Jennings Clardy WSC
$45,842
g.
Under the proposed rate structure, the water monthly base charge for a 5/8" or
3/4" meter residential customer will increase from $5.91 to $7.00, while water
rates (or all residential customers in excess of base volumes will increase from
$2.15 to $2.45 per hundred cubic feet (CCF).
h.
Under the proposed rate structure, the wastewater monthly base charge for a 5/8"
or 3/4" meter residential customer will increase from $6.31 to $7.50, while
wastewater rates for all residential customers in excess of base volumes will
increase from $3.10 to $3.25 per CCF.
1.
The combined water and wastewater monthly charge for the average residential
customer will increase from $36.45 to $40.98.
j.
The following provides examples of the rate increases on average customer
consumption for various meter sizes:
RESIDENTIAL
Billing Units
Water / Current Proposed Percent / Dollar
Meter Size Wastewater (CCF) Monthlv Bill Monthlv Bill Increase
5/8" and 3/4" 750/600 $36.45 $40.98 12.4% / $4.53
1" 2,000/1,600 $104.56 $114.00 9.0% / $9.44
I Yz" 2,700/2,000 $132.01 $144.15 9.2%/$12.14
2" 6,500/6,000 $337.71 $367.25 8.7% / $29.54
City of Paris. Teeas
Water and Wastewater Cost ofServiceSwdy
March 2003
3
REVISED DRAFT
COMMERCIAL
Billing Units Current Proposed Percent / Dollar
Meter Size (CCF) Monthly Bill Monthly Bill Increase
5/8" and 3/4" 1,000 $59.74 $65.80 10.1 % / $6.06
I" 2,800 $148.10 $167.20 12.9% / $19.10
I W' 5,500 $282.29 $313.00 10.9% / $30.71
2" 14,000 $704.74 $772.00 9.5% / $67.26
3" 34,000 $1,735.05 $1,890.00 8.9% / $154.95
k.
The unaccounted for treated water loss is approximately 18 percent. This may be
due to under-registration by meters and/or losses in the distribution system.
C.
Recommendations
a.
It is recommended that the new water and wastewater rates proposed in Section
IX of this report be adopted.
b.
The City should continue its rehabilitation program of the water and wastewater
systems in order to reduce lost and unaccounted for water and meet mandatory
improvements required by federal and state agencies.
c.
As recommended in the 1999 Rate Study, we once again recommend that in order
to stabilize wastewater revenues, the City should move from billing at a
maximum winter average, to a flat winter average.
The City is currently
experiencing notable revenue fluctuation and underperformance from the
maximum winter average method. Moving to a flat winter average will help to
CilyofPo,is. T~'as
Wot., and Wastewo/" Cost ofSenlice Study
Ma"h 2003
4
REVISED DRAFT
alleviate revenue fluctuation and improve revenue performance through more
reliable projections.
A flat winter average is used under the assumption that on average throughout the
year, customers will contribute water volumes to the City's wastewater system
equivalent to the winter average.
From a billing standpoint, the flat winter
avera~e means that once a customer's winter average is determined, that customer
will be charged that winter average volume every month (revenue stability and
predictability). In addition, because of consistent volumes charged each month, it
will be easier for City staff to determine and track whether the billing system is
accurately capturing and billing the appropriate volumes.
d.
Due to the declining water volumes purchased by the City's largest customer,
Campbell's Soup, as well as declining water volumes purchased by the
Residential customer class, we recommend that the City begin reviewing their
water and wastewater rates on an annual basis to ensure that the rates are
sufficient to meet cost demands.
e.
In August 1999, Lamar County Water Supply District (LCWSD) purchased 38.7
million gallons of treated water through the City's distribution system. The City's
contract with LCWSD states that LCWSD can not purchase more than 1.4 million
gallons of water per day through the City's distribution system. The average daily
water purchased by LCWSD in August 1999 was 1.25 million gallons. It is
highly unlikely that LCWSD was able to maintain a steady rate of 1.25 MGD.
We recommend that the City closely monitor LCWSD's distribution
City o¡ Paris. Texas
Waler and Wastewater Casl o¡Service Swdy
March ZO03
5
REVISED DRAFT
consumption, in order to ensure compliance with the contract and limit undue
demand on the City's water distribution system.
City of Paris. Texas
Water and Wos/ewaterCos/ of Sendee Study
Mareh 1003
6
REVISED DRAFT
II.
CHOICE OF TEST YEAR AND ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY FOR
WATER RATE STUDY
A.
Test Year
Based on the revie)V of the water production and consumption data of the City's water utility
system, the twelve-month period of October 2000 through September 2001 was chosen as the
"test year" for the water rate study.
B.
Allocation
The purpose of the cost allocation is to express the utility's total cost of service in terms of costs
associated with the various components of that service. This approach allows the costs to be
recovered from the customers of the system in accordance with their use of the various
components. Allocation allows the utility to achieve equity in water and wastewater rates,
assuring that the customers pay for service on the basis of their use of the system. Typically, the
allocation process is handled in steps - first, allocating costs to the various service functions and
then distributing them to customers according to their use of each function. In general, the
service costs are associated with supplying both the customer's average and peak rates of use and
with customer meter reading, accounting, billing administration and fire service.
C.
Cost Functionalization. Allocation and Distribution Method
The base-extra capacity method of functionalizing, allocating cost to service functions, and
distributing costs to customer classes is commonly used in the water utility industry. This
Cityol?or;s. Tems
Waler and Wastewater Cost olService Study
March 2003
7
REVISED DRAFT
method recognizes the differences in the cost of providing service due to variations in average
rate of use and peak rate of use by a customer class. The method also recognizes the effects of
system diversity on costs. Costs are generally divided into three components: (a) base costs, (b)
extra capacity costs and (c) customer costs. Base costs are those that tend to vary with the total
quantity of water used plus capital costs and operation and maintenance costs needed to provide
service to customers, under average load conditions. Extra capacity costs are those costs incurred
above the average operating conditions, and are necessary to support peaking conditions.
Customer costs are those associated with serving customers regardless of the amount of water
used, i.e., meter reading, accounting, billing, etc.
The allocation of cost between base and extra capacity components depends upon the design and
use of the particular portion of the water system being analyzed. If an asset of the water system
is designed to meet only the average demand on the system - a raw water supply reservoir for
instance - the capital costs and operation and maintenance costs for that asset are totally allocated
to the base component. If the asset is designed to provide additional capacity which is needed to
provide peak demand on the system, the capital and operating costs associated with the asset are
allocated to base and extra capacity components in the same proportion that the capacity of the
asset is used for average and peak use. The appropriate allocation factors between base and extra
capacity usually vary from system to system. Therefore, they should be determined from actual
operating history or design criteria of the system.
The other important consideration for setting equitable rates for utility service is the
establishment of customer classes for cost distribution after costs are allocated to service
City of Paris. Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost of Sendee Study
March 2003
8
REVISED DRAFT
functions. A customer class should include only those customers who; (a) are in similar location
in relation to the utility, (b) use the same or similar facilities of the utility, (c) receive similar
service from the utility, and (d) place similar demands of the utility. It is important to note that
makeup of the customer class can change depending upon the particular asset that is being
allocated. A customer class that is appropriate for allocation of one type of cost, e.g., water
treatment costs, max include customers that would not be appropriate to the class when another
type of cost of assets is allocated, e.g., treated water distribution costs. The objective of cost
allocation and ultimate distribution to customer groups is to avoid cross-subsidization, and it is
important with that objective in view, differences in service commitment and service
requirement be given full consideration in determining customer classes.
D.
Determination of Customer Classes
The City's water utility serves residential, commercial and industrial customers. Besides these
customers, the City has four treated water contract customers, Campbell Soup, Tenaska III,
LCWSD, a municipal utility district that retails to its own customers, and Marvin-Jennings
Clardy WSC, a water supply corporation that retails to its own customers. In addition, the City
has a contract to provide raw water to Lamar Power Partners. Small industrial customers have
been grouped with commercial customers to correspond to the City's current rate structure. The
following lists the treated water customer classes isolated in the report.
a.
Residential customers
b.
Commercial customers (including small industry)
c.
Campbell Soup
d.
Tenaska III
Cityo/Paris. Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost D/Service Study
March ZO03
9
REVISED DRAFT
e.
Lamar County Water Supply District
Marvin-Jennings Clardy WSC was not isolated as a customer class for rate determination due to
the nature oftheir contract, which determines the rate from a previously agreed upon volumetric
rate adjusted annually for inflation. Certain adjustments must be made in the cost of service and
rate design study ,to recognize Marvin-Jennings Clardy WSC's contract.
The adjustments
included, removing Marvin-Jennings Clardy WSC's consumption from the rate calculation and
recognizing their estimated revenues from the contract rate charge as a revenue offset in the cost
of service determination. Lamar Power Partners was isolated as a customer class, however, its
raw water rate was calculated separately and the revenues associated with the raw water
purchases were used as an offset to calculate the treated water rates. These adjustments help to
prevent an overestimate of consumption and an underestimate of revenues.
Cityo/Poris. Tems
Water oed Wastewater Cost a/Service SIIIdy
Morch 2003
10
REVISED DRAFT
1lI.
ANALYSIS OF TEST YEAR DATA
A.
Water Utility System Data
The City maintains daily treated water production data at the treatment plant. The system peak
pumpage of treated :vater recorded on July 25, 2001 was 20.428 million gallons with a peak to
average day ratio of 1.66 (20.428 MGD/ 12.322 MGD). Table A-I in Appendix A shows the
system demand and capacity factors for the test year.
B.
Allocation Operation and Maintenance Expenses to Functional Cost Components
In order to recognize that certain facilities of the City's water utility system are used in common
by two, three, four or all five of the customer classes identified in Section II, five customer
groups have been formed for system cost allocation purposes. These cost factors have also been
separated into three principal components of Base, Extra Capacity, and Customer costs to
provide a means of further distributing functionalized costs to the various customer classes on
the basis of the respective responsibilities of each group for each particular cost function.
Each element of cost is allocated to functional cost components of the system on the basis of the
parameter or parameters having the most significant influence on the magnitude of the element
of cost.
Operation and maintenance expenses are allocated directly to appropriate cost
components. Similarly, debt service costs are allocated to the appropriate cost functions.
CityolParis, Te,as
Water and Wastewater Cost olService Study
March 2003
11
REVISED DRAFT
c.
Distribution of Functionalized Cost Components to Customer Groups
This is the final step in determining the revenue requirement of each individual group of
customers from the total revenue requirement of the water system as a whole.
The
functionalized cost factors are determined for each individual customer group on the basis of
each group's annual usage characteristics.
Due to the point-of-take of water for three of the four contract customers, transmission and
distribution costs were isolated. While the water treatment plant is used and useful in providing
service to all customers of the City, the same does not hold true for the treated water
transmission and distribution system. Campbell Soup and Tenaska III currently receive treated
water directly from transmission lines from the treatment plant, not from the City's distribution
system. LCWSD receives the bulk of their water purchases through the City's transmission
lines. In the absence of detailed distribution system analysis during peak hour flow conditions,
the treated water transmission and distribution system has been segregated by inch-feet into three
groups - lines less than 8 inches in diameter, lines between 8 inches and 24 inches in diameter,
and lines greater than 24 inches in diameter - for cost allocation purposes between the classes of
treated water customers. Table A-2 in Appendix A shows the percentages of inch-feet of treated
water transmission lines separated into the three pipe size groups.
D.
Treated Water Loss Allocation
No treated water loss has been prorated to water received by Campbell Soup, Tenaska III and
LCWSD. Table A-3 in Appendix A shows treated water allocation percentages to City's retail
Cif)! of Paris. Texas
Woterand Wastewaler Cost of Service Study
March 2003
12
REVISED DRAFT
customers, Campbell Soup, LCWSD and Tenaska III, including treated water losses allocated to
the retail customers of the City.
E.
Treated Water Use and Capacity ReQuirements of Customer Classes
To distribute functionalized system component costs to customer classes - residential class,
commercial class, Çampbell Soup, LCWSD and Tenaska III, assumptions had to be made as to
peak-day demands of residential and commercial classes of customers. The actual test year
average-day demands and peak-day demands were used for Campbell Soup, LCWSD and
Tenaska III. Table A-I in Appendix A shows the individual customer classes' average and peak-
day demands. Campbell Soup's water purchases from the City has declined over the past two
fiscal years (FY 1999/2000 and FY 2000/2001) and is continuing that trend this fiscal year (FY
2001/2002). In order to recognize the decrease in water purchases by Campbell Soup, the latest
available water purchases (October 2001 through January 2002) were combined with February
2001 through September 2001 as an estimate for FY 2001/2002 water consumption. It was
estimated that Campbell Soup would experience the same peak day volumes as incurred in FY
2000/2001. The table also shows the capacity factors for the classes as well as their relative
percentages of base and extra capacity components of the system used and useful in providing
service to the five customer classes during the test year.
City of Paris. Tems
Water and Wa.Slewaler Cast oflk",;ce Study
March 2003
13
REVISED DRAFT
F.
Treated Water System Allocation
Distribution Lines
Since the entire treated water transmission and distribution system is not allocable to all of the
five customer classes, system cost allocation percentages of the distribution system not common
to all are determine~ separately. All lines larger than 24 inches in diameter are assumed to be
common to all treated water customers.
Hydrants
Fire protection service is not common to all five customer classes of the City's water system.
Therefore, operating and maintenance costs associated with fire service are distributed to the
residential and commercial customers of the City on the basis of their meter equivalency
demands.
Meters
Meter costs are distributed on the basis of equivalent 5/8" meters. Table A-4 in Appendix A
shows the number of equivalent meters in the City's water system. Costs are distributed on the
basis of the number of equivalent meters.
Warehouse
Warehouse costs are allocated to the customer classes based upon the functionalized component
allocation factors as shown on Table A-6 in Appendix A.
Hillin!!: and Collectin!!:
Other billing and collecting costs are allocated to all five customer classes based upon the
number of test year bills sent to each customer class.
CllyofPar;., Te<as
Water aad Wastewaler Cost of Service Study
March 2003
14
REVISED DRAFT
Administrative Fees
Administrative fees cover the expenses of the general government in connection with
administering the Utility Fund. Such costs vary by customer class depending on the demands
and requirements placed on the system by each class and are appropriately allocated among
classes based upon the relative total revenue requirements of each class.
Ciryo/Paris, Te:<as
Water and Wastewater Cost a/Service Study
March 2003
15
REVISED DRAFT
IV.
CUSTOMER CLASS DISTRIBUTION FACTORS
A.
Distribution Factors for Operation and Maintenance Expenses
All system operation and maintenance expenses are functionalized and allocated according to the
allocation units shgwn in Table A-6 in Appendix A. These functionalized costs should be
distributed to the five customer classes based upon the system base, base/max day, except for
meters, hydrants, billing/collecting and administrative fees. Operating and maintenance expense
for the exceptions are allocated as described in detail in the previous section. Table A-6 in
Appendix A gives the cost distribution units for the total test year operation and maintenance
expenses ofthe City's water utility system allocable to each of the customer classes.
B.
Debt Service Cost Distribution
All debt service and other capital expenditures should be allocated to the customers on the basis
of distribution factors for plant responsibility as well as specific usage of the proceeds of each
bond issue.
City of Paris. rexas
Waler and Wastewat., Cost afService Study
March 2003
16
REVISED DRAFT
v.
WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY FINANCIAL OPERATIONS
A.
Determination of Test Year Revenue ReQuirements
To recognize the City's contract customers' contractual terms two test year revenue requirements
were developed, on¡:: for the contract customers, and one for the retail customers. Table B-1 in
Appendix B shows the revenue requirement, as adjusted, for the test year for the contract
customers. Table C-l in Appendix C shows the revenue requirement, as adjusted, for the test
year for the retail customers. The revenue requirement for the contract customers was developed
on the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001 actual expenses, while the retail customer revenue
requirement was based on the City's FY 2001/2002 budget. Adjustments and reclassifications to
the revenue requirements are as follows:
Raw Water Supply
Since the City budgets both raw water supply and water treatment O&M expenses in
Water Production, it is necessary to separate raw water supply costs into their own
separately-allocable cost section. Production electricity is allocated between supply and
treatment based upon the ratio of supply and treatment electricity expense to production
electricity expense.
Water Distribution and Transmission
Water distribution and transmission costs must be reclassified from expense type to cost-
causal categories. Personnel, supplies, contractual, building maintenance, equipment
maintenance, sundry costs, and equipment capital outlay are classified into the three
categories of distribution and transmission (less than 8", 8" to 24", and greater than 24")
City of Paris. rems
Walerand Was/ewaler Cos/af&rviceSllldy
March 2001
17
REVISED DRAFT
based upon the test year water system inch-feet percentages calculated on Table A-2 in
Appendix A. Hydrants/valves and meters/meter boxes remain separate categories for
cost allocation purposes.
Debt Service
The contracts for Campbell Soup and Tenaska III allow for adjustments in known and
measurable c:hanges from the end of the fiscal year to the cost of service determination.
Debt Service is based on the projected principal and interest payments for FY 2002/2003
of the City's Current outstanding debt issues.
B.
Allocation of Revenue Requirements to Water and Wastewater
Table B-1 in Appendix B and Table C-l in Appendix C present the allocation of the total utility
revenue requirement to water and wastewater for applicable treated water contract customers and
retail customers, respectively.
Raw water supply, water production, water distribution and
transmission, wastewater maintenance, wastewater treatment, and lift stations costs are directly
assigned to their respective function. Other operations and maintenance costs are allocated
between water and wastewater as follows;
'Varehouse
Warehouse costs are allocated 50/50 between water and wastewater under the assumption
that it services the water and wastewater system equally.
Hillin!! and Collectin!!
The billing and collecting function has been allocated 50/50 between water and
wastewater under the assumption that it services the water and wastewater system
equally.
City a/Paris. Tems
Water and Wastewater Cost a/Service Study
March 1003
18
REVISED DRAFT
Administrative Fees
Administrative fees are allocated between water and wastewater based upon the ratio of
operations and maintenance expenses assigned to each.
Debt Service
Debt servic~ costs for outstanding debt issues are allocated based upon historical records
of assets, capital improvement plans and discussions with City staff.
City 01 Paris- rexas
Waler and Wastewater Cost olService Study
March 1003
19
REVISED DRAFT
VI.
WATER UTILITY SYSTEM - FINANCIAL DATA
A.
Functionalization of Revenue Requirement
Table C-2 in Appendix C details the functionalization of adjusted expense levels into the various
Base-Extra Capacity and Customer Components ofthe System on the basis of factors previously
discussed in Section II of this report. The components and related expenses are as follows:
Base
Extra Capacity
Customer Costs
Revenue
Requirement
$4,353,520
1,750,820
347,277
Total Revenue Requirement
$6,451,618
B.
Allocation of Revenue Requirements to Customer Classes
Based upon the customer class allocation percentages developed in Section III of this report, the
Water Utility's revenue requirement has been allocated to the various customer classes (before
adjusting for contract customers' terms) as follows:
Campbell Soup
LCWSD
Revenue
Requirement
$2,174,171
1,690,964
1,277,184
924,105
385,193
Residential
Commercial
Tenaska III
Total Revenue Requirement
$6,451,618
CiryolParis. Texas
Water aad Wastewater Cost alService Study
March 2003
20
REVISED DRAFT
Table C-3 in Appendix C presents a detailed description of the various components of costs
assigned to each customer class.
CiryolPoris. Texas
Walerand WastewolerCost olService Study
March 2003
21
REVISED DRAFT
VII.
REVIEW OF W ASTEW A TER SYSTEM DATA
A.
Review of Historical Wastewater Data
To determine a comparison of wastewater production to water consumption by the City's water
utility customers, av:ailable test year data was analyzed for the purpose of this study. From the
test year residential water consumption, water-only (customers with sprinkler meters and septic
tanks) consumption was removed.
Commercial contribution to the wastewater system is estimated from the commercial and retail
industrial water consumption after eliminating the consumption of the water-only accounts.
Since the commercial and industrial water consumption exhibits minimal seasonal variation,
nearly 100 percent of the water consumption of these customers contribute to the wastewater
system.
B.
Svstem Wastewater Loadiol! Data
A review of the data on wastewater treatment obtained from the City indicates that the facilities
have performed well under normal loading conditions. The following table shows the range of
flow and wastewater influent strengths for the test year.
Cityo/Paris. Tetas
Water and Wastewater Cost o/Service Study
March 2003
22
REVISED DRAFT
\Vastewater Inlluent Characteristics
Flow in
Period MGD BOD TSS NH3
mgL! Ibs. mgL! Ibs. mgL! Ibs.
Test Period 4.73 113.19 1.63M 120.11 1.73M 6.59 .10M
Average
The average flow, BOD, TSS and NH3 of the wastewater system are well within the design
parameters of the City's wastewater treatment facilities.
c.
Determination of Customer Classes
The City has a special contract with Earthgrains with respect to wastewater discharge.
Earthgrains wastewater rate is not based on the total cost of service for the wastewater utility
since Earthgrains contributed up-front capital to reserve a certain capacity in the wastewater
treatment plant for future use. In order to recognize Earthgrains' contract with regard to the cost
of service and rate design study, Earthgrains' wastewater volumes were removed from the rate
calculation and their revenues were recognized as revenue offsets. These adjustments help to
prevent an overestimate of wastewater billing units and an underestimate ofrevenues.
For the purpose of distributing the total revenue requirement for the system, the wastewater
utility customers are divided into two classes: residential and commercial. For rate design
purposes, residential customers are assumed to discharge wastewater of normal system strength,
while commercial customers are assumed to discharge at slightly higher strengths based upon
industry standards. Any metered commercial customer that discharges wastewater of strength
Ciry of Paris. Te.tas
Water and Wastewater Cast afService Study
March 2003
23
REVISED DRAFT
greater than these criteria set for residential and commercial customers pays for the added cost of
treatment required.
D.
Allocation Factors for Customer Class Revenue Requirements
For cost allocation purposes, conditions corresponding to an average flow of 4.73 MGD with
BOD of 113 mg/I or.1,628,146Ibs., TSS of120 mg/I or 1,727,729Ibs. and ammonia loading of7
mg/I or 94,728Ibs. are assumed. (Table C-6, Appendix C)
CityojPads, Texas
Waterand Wastewater Cost ajService Swdy
March 2003
24
REVISED DRAFT
VIII. DETERMINATION OF TEST YEAR REVENUE REOUIREMENT
Table C-l in Appendix C shows the revenue requirement, as adjusted for the test year. As
shown in this exhibit, the total revenue requirement for the City's Wastewater Utility is
estimated to be $4,372,792. The initial beginning point in developing the total wastewater utility
revenue requirement was the City's FY 2001/2002 budget adjusted to incorporate the projected
FY 2002/2003 debt service.
A.
Functionalization of Revenue ReQuirement
Unlike the water utility system, where separate consideration of extra capacity components of
plants and facilities is crucial to equitable allocation and cost distribution among customer
classes, it is not necessary to account for extra capacity in the allocation and distribution of costs
among wastewater utility customers unless there is large reserve capacity in the system.
The City's wastewater operation and maintenance expenses can be functionalized into the
following service cost functions:
a.
Warehouse
b.
Billing and Collecting
c.
Sewer Maintenance (Wastewater Collection)
d.
Wastewater Treatment
e.
Lift Station
CityojP.,;s, Texas
Wolerand Wastewaler Cost ojServiceS/lldy
March 2003
25
REVISED DRAFT
Warehouse
Since wastewater warehouse operations serve both treatment and collection, warehouse costs are
functionalized based upon composite allocation factors.
Billint! and Collectint!
These are costs ass~ciated with meter reading, billing, administration and other functions of the
wastewater utility that are independent of quantity and quality of the wastewater contribution by
a customer.
Sewer Maintenance
Since wastewater flows do not vary significantly except due to infiltration/inflow, which must be
shared by all customers of the system, allocation and distribution of all costs for wastewater
collection may be made among customer classes on the basis of average annual wastewater flow
contribution to the system. All capital costs and operation and maintenance costs associated with
the wastewater collection system should be allocated on the basis of relative percentages of
wastewater flow during the test period.
Wastewater Treatment
Factors affecting wastewater treatment are different and many.
Not only the volume of
wastewater contribution by a class of customer is relevant, but also the quality of the wastewater
is important. Treatment facilities must be designed to meet both the hydraulic loading and the
biochemical loading.
Historically, the City's wastewater utility has measured wastewater
strength in tenDS of three parameters:
a.
BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand)
b.
TSS (Total Suspended Solids)
City of Paris. Te,as
Water and WaSlewa/er COSI of Service Study
March ZO03
26
REVISED DRAFT
c.
Ammonia (NH3)
Costs of operating and maintaining the treatment plant, therefore, must be allocated and
functionalized by these parameters, BOD, TSS and NH3, so that revenues may be collected from
the customer on the basis of not only quantity of wastewater, but also quality of the wastewater.
Lift Station
Lift stations are Ui~ed to elevate waste along the wastewater collection system or into to the
treatment plant.
Since the costs associated with lift stations depend on the quantity of
wastewater and not the quality of wastewater, lift station costs were functionalized to flow.
Employing the appropriate factors, the test year wastewater revenue requirement has been
allocated to the functions of Flow, BOD, TSS, Ammonia, and Customer Costs. The results of
this allocation are shown on Table C-5 in Appendix C and are summarized as follows:
Customer Costs
$2,455,548
1,058,362
580,098
44,736
234,047
Flow
BOD
TSS
Ammonia
Total
$4,372,792
City of Poris. re.ms
Water and Wastewater Cost ofSe",;ce Stlldy
March 2003
27
REVISED DRAFT
IX.
RATE DESIGN
A.
Water Rates
Consultant Recommended Water Rate Schedule
RESIDENTIAL CLASS
Base Cost
Excess of Base
Meter Size (Inches)
(Cubic Foot)
(Per CCF)
5/8 and 3/4
$7.00 for first 200
$2.45 for each add. 100
I and larger
$34.00 for first 1,000
$2.45 for each add. 100
COMMERCIAL CLASS
8 and larger
Base Cost Excess of Base
(Cubic Foot) (Per CCF)
$8.50 for first 200 $2.45 for each add. 100
$34.00 for first 1,000 $2.00 for each add. 100
$120.00 for first 3,000 $2.00 for each add. 100
$2,000 for first 100,000 $2.00 for each add. 100
$3,000 for first 150,000 $2.00 for each add. 100
$4,000 for first 200,000 $2.00 for each add. 100
Meter Size (Inches)
5/8 and 3/4
I and 2
Larger than 2
4
6
Citya[Paris. Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost a[ServleeStudy
Mareh 1003
28
REVISED DRAFT
B.
Analysis of Campbell Soup Company Contract
Based on Campbell Soup's current contract rate and estimated volumes, Campbell Soup will
provide $1,211,691 in revenue, as shown in Table B-2 in Appendix B.
C.
Analysis of Lamar County 'Vater Supply District Contract
Under the current c°.ntractual agreement with LCWSD, it is estimated that the City of Paris will
recover $668,320 from LCWSD water purchases through the City's transmission system. Due to
the unpredictability of LCWSD's water purchases through the City's distribution system,
estimated water distribution revenues were not detennined, however, a rate is provided based on
FY 2000/2001 data.
LCWSD revenues derived by the contract billing method and the
distribution rate are shown in Table B-2 in Appendix B.
D.
Analvsis of Ten ask a III Contract
Based on Tenaska III's current rate and estimated volumes, Tenaska III will provide $364,286 in
revenue as shown in Table B-2 in Appendix B.
E.
Analysis of Marvin-Jenninl!s Clardy WSC Contract
Based on the cpr increased allowed per the Marvin-Jennings Clardy contract, it is estimated that
Marvin-Jennings Clardy WSC will provide $45,842 in revenue as shown in Table B-2 in
Appendix B.
Cilya/Paris. Tetas
Water and Wastewater Cast a/Service Sludy
March 2003
29
REVISED DRAFT
F.
Lamar Power Partners
Per the contractual terms with Lamar Power Partners, it is estimated that Lamar Power Partners
will provide $275,791 in revenue from raw water purchases to the City as shown in Table B-2 in
Appendix B.
G.
Wastewater Rates
Consultant Recommended Wastewater Rate Schedule
RESIDENTIAL CLASS
Meter Size (Inches)
Base Cost
(Cubic Foot)
Excess of Base
(Per CCF)
5/8 and 3/4
$7.50 for first 200
$3.25 for each add. 100
I and larger
$36.00 for first 1,000
$3.25 for each add. 100
COMMERCIAL CLASS
Meter Size (Inches)
Base Cost
(Cubic Foot)
Excess of Base
(Per CCF)
5/8 and 3/4
$10.50 for first 200
$3.40 for each add. 100
I and 2
$36.00 for first 1,000
$3.40 for each add. 100
Larger than 2
$62.00 for first 2,000
$3.40 for each add. 100
CityofPa,is. Texas
Wat"aad Wastewat" Cost ojSe/'ViceStudy
Ma,.h ZO03
30
REVISED DRAFT
Excess Strength Charge
BOD
$0.65/lb above 250 my I
TSS
$0.34/1b above 250 mg/I
NH3
$0.47/lb above 30 mg/I
Residential wastew~ter customers are currently billed on a maximum winter average, which
places a cap on the monthly wastewater volumes that are billed. The use of a maximum winter
average results in irregular monthly billings, placing increased risk on the City. To mitigate the
risk associated with the maximum winter average, the City should implement a flat winter
average for determining residential wastewater volumes. The flat winter average assumes that a
residential customer's monthly wastewater volumes on average will reflect the winter average,
that is, some months the residential customer will contribute more to the wastewater system and
some months will contribute less. However, the maximum winter average assumes that the
residential customer will not exceed the winter average. The proposed residential wastewater
rates were calculated using a flat winter average, assuming 625 cubic on average per residential
wastewater customer.
For wastewater service to customers who do not receive water service from the City, monthly
billings should be based upon consumption information obtained from the water supplier. If the
City experiences additional costs in obtaining the wastewater data, these costs should be included
in billing the wastewater customers.
CityalParis. Texas
Water and Wastewater Cast alService Study
March 2003
31
REVISED DRAFT
Commercial and industrial customers should be billed on the basis of 100 percent of the actual
metered water consumption except those customers whose wastewater is metered. The latter
should be billed for 100 percent of the metered wastewater.
Unit charges for BOD, TSS and ammonia are computed so that individual customers that exceed
the limits adopted <;10 the basis of domestic wastewater can be charged for excess strength
according to the unit charges in the rate schedule on Table C-6 in Appendix C.
City 01 Paris. Texas
Water and Wastewater Cost olService Study
March 2003
32
TABLE A-I
CITY OF PARIS
WATER UTILITY
CUSTOMER USE AND CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS
BASE-EXTRA CAPACITY METHOD
TEST YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 31, 2001
CAPACITY TOTAL
AVERAGE DAY FACTOR CAPACITY EXTRA CAPACITY
(000', (000',
CUSTOMER CLASS GALLONS) % PEAK DAY % PEAK DAY GALLONS) %
RESIDENTIAL 2.689 21.82% 139% 3.745 1.055 13.02%
COMMERCIAL 3.257 26.43% 109% 3.554 297 3.67%
CAMPBELL'S SOUP 2,893 23.48% 231% 6,694 3.801 46.90%
TENASKA 11I 1.032 8.38% 183% 1,887 855 10.54%
LAMAR COUNTY 2,451 19.89% 186% 4.548 2,097 25.87%
TOTAL SYSTEM 12,322 100.00% 166% 20,428 8,106 100.00%
Page I of I
TABLE A-2
CITY OF PARIS
WATER UTILITY
WATER AND W ASTEW ATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
TREATED WATER DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION LINES
SIZE INCHES LENGTH FEET INCH-FEET PERCENT CLASS
0.75 1,356 1,017
1.00 1,054 1,054
L50 585 878
2.00 102,064 204,128
3.00 351 1.053
4.00 113,t53 452,6t2
6.00 297,777 1,786,662
SUBTOTAL 516,340 2,447,404 25.72% <8"
8.00 t39,449 1,1l5,592
10.00 75,557 755,570
12.00 114,935 1,379,220
14.00 1l,555 161,770
16.00 9,343 149,488
t8.00 6,000 t08,000
20.00 26,182 523,640
24.00 t4,954 358,896
SUBTOTAL 397,975 4,552,176 47.84% 8" - 24"
30.00 t5,293 458,790
33.00 12,062 398,046
36.00 46,060 1,658,160
SUBTOTAL 73,415 2,514,996 26.43% >24"
TOTAL 987,730 9,514,576 100%
Pagetofl
TABLE A-3
CITY OF PARIS
WATER UTILITY
TREATED WATER LOSS ALLOCATION
YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 31, 2001
TOTAL TREATED
WATERALLOCATlON
TREATED WATER SOLD TOTAL INCLUDING LOSS
VIA VIA
TRANSMISSION DISTRIBUTION
CUSTOMER CLASS (Cuft.) (CuR) PERCENT LOSS (Cu ft.) (Cu ft.) PERCENT
RESIDENTIAL 77,000,132 15.45% 48,236,965 125.237,097 20.74%
COMMERCIAL 94,187,763 18.90% 57.475.006 151,662,769 25.11%
CAMPBELL SOUP 154,405,054 30.99% 154,405,054 25.56%
TENASKA 111 50,381,822 10.11% 50.381,822 8.34%
LAMAR COUNTY WSD 113,772,777 5,838.743 24.01% 119.611,520 19.80%
MJCWSD 2.688,010 0.54% 2.688,010 0.45%
TOTAL SYSTEM 318.559.653 179,714,648 498.274,301 105.711.971 603.986,272 100.00%
¡PERCENT 52.74% 29.75% 17.50% 100.00%1
Pagel of!
TABLE A-4
CITY OF PARIS
WATER UTILITY
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
EQUIVALENT METERS BY CUSTOMER CLASS
3/4" or
CUSTOMER ClASS less 1" t1/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 20" TOTAL
RESIDENTIAL
NUM8ER 8,403 32 34 7 8,476
EQUIVALENTS 8,403 53 114 37 8,607
COMMERCIAL
NUM8ER 1,169 138 161 154 14 9 1 1 1 t,64B
EQUIVALENTS 1,169 231 536 B21 140 ISO 33 S3 314 3,447
CAMP8ELL SOUP
NUMBER 1 1
EQUIVALENTS 314 314
TENASKA III
NUMBER 1 1 2
EQUIVALENTS 17 53 70
LAMAR COUNTY WSD
NUMBER 2 t 3
EQUIVALENTS 107 77 183
TOTAL SYSTEM
NUMBER 9,572 170 19S 161 14 10 1 4 1 2 10,130
EQUIVALENTS 9,S72 2B4 650 BS8 140 167 33 213 77 62B 12,621
Page 1 ofl
TABLEA-5
CITY OF PARIS
WASTEWATER UTILITY
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
EQUIVALENT METERS BY CUSTOMER CLASS
3/4" or
CUSTOMER CLASS less 1" 11/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 20" TOTAL
RESIDENTIAL
NUMBER 8,lS4 31 33 7 0 0 0 8,22S
EQUIVALENTS 8,154 51 111 36 0 0 0 8,352
COMMERCIAL
NUMBER 1,038 123 143 137 12 8 1 1 0 0 1,463
EQUIVALENTS 1,038 205 476 729 124 133 30 47 0 0 2,783
CAMPBELL SOUP
NUMBER 1 1
EQUIVALENTS 0 0 0 0 0 314 314
TOTAL SYSTEM
NUMBER 9,192 154 176 144 12 8 1 1 0 1 9,689
EQUIVALENTS 9,192 256 587 765 124 133 30 47 0 314 11,449
Page I oft
TABLE A-6
CITY OF PARIS
WATER UTILITY
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
CUSTOMER CLASS ALLOCATION UNITS
Item Total Residential Commercial Campbell Soup Tenaska III LCWSD
O&M Exuenses
Supply 12,322 2,689 3,257 2,893 1,032 2,451
Treatment
Base 12.322 2.689 3,257 2,893 1,032 2,451
Max Day 8.106 1,055 297 3.801 855 2,097
Trans. & Dist.
Dist. < 8"
Base 5,946 2,689 3,257
Max Day 1,353 1,055 297
Trans. 8" to 24"
Base 5,946 2,689 3.257
Max Day 1.353 1.055 297
Trans. > 24"
Base 12,322 2.689 3,257 2,893 1.032 2,451
Max Day 8,106 1,055 297 3.801 855 2,097
Meters 12,621 8,607 3,447 314 70 183
Hydrants 12.054 8,607 3,447 0 0 0
Warehouse 12.322 2,689 3,257 2,893 1,032 2,451
Billing & Collecting 121,555 IOt,712 19,771 12 24 36
Admioistration Fees Allocated based on revenue requirement
Debt Service
Supply 12,322 2,689 3,257 2,893 1,032 2,451
Treatment
Base 12,322 2,689 3.257 2.893 1,032 2,451
Max Day 8.106 1,055 297 3,801 855 2.097
Dist.<8"
Base 5,946 2,689 3.257
Max Day 1,353 1,055 297
Trans. 8" to 24"
Base 5,946 2.689 3.257 0 0
Max Day 1,353 1,055 297 0 0
Trans. > 24"
Base 12,322 2,689 3,257 2,893 1.032 2,451
Max Day 8.106 1,055 297 3,801 855 2,097
Billin8 & Collection 121.555 101,712 19,771 12 24 36
Page 1 ofl
B
TABLE B-1
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 100/ Actuals
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Warehouse
Personnel Cost
Salories & Wages
Social Security
TMRS & Pension
Employee Hospitalizations Ins
Worke(s Compensation Ins
Unemployment Compensation
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL
~
Office Supplies
Postage
Wearing Apparel
Motor Vehicles - Gasoline
Motor Vehicles - Oil & lubricant
MotorVehicles-Tires
Laundry Cleaning Etc
SUBTOTAL
~
Communications - Telephone
Insurance & Bonds
Travel Expenses
Utilities - Electricity
Utilities - Water and Gas
Training - Tuition
SUBTOTAL
Maintenance, Buildin.s
Buildings & Grounds
SUBTOTAL
Maintenance
Furniture & Fixtures
Machinery Tools Equipment
Motor Vehicles
Electronic Data Processing
SUBTOTAL
Pagel of 14
63,3/1 31,656 31,656
4,897 2.449 2.449
5,/09 2,555 2,555
7,9/1 3.956 3,956
1,704 1,352 1.352
708 354 354
84,643 42.321 42,321
407 204 204
311 161 161
111 III III
350 175 175
/5 8 8
41 21 21
/,357 679 679
1,059 1,029 1,029
/,910 960 960
569 285 285
518 264 264
5,075 2,538 2.538
/34 67 67
/34 67 67
689
689
/,378
692
/,385
692
CrTYOFPARlS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FV 2001 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 200/ Actual<
Allocated to
Wate<
Allocated to
Wastewater
Sund", Charm
Auditing
SUBTOTAL
Eauioment
Machinery-Tools-Equipment
Motor Vehicles
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL WAREHOUSE
I
Personnel Cost
Salaries & Wages
Social Security
TMRS & Pension
Employee Hospitalizations Ins
Worke<'s Compensation Ins
Unemployment Compensation
Overtime
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL
~
Office SuppHes
Postage
Wearing Apparel
Motor Vehicles - Gasoline
Motor Vehicles - Oil & Lubricant
MotorVehicles-Tires
Motor Vehicles - Batteries
Laundry Cleaning Etc
Mechanical
SUBTOTAL
Contractual
Communications - Telephone
Car Allowance
Insurance & Bonds
Travel Expenses
Utilities, Electricity
Associations
Utilities - Water and Gas
Training - Tuition, Etc.
Consultants
SUBTOTAL
Billing & Collection
Page2afl4
/35
68
68
/35
68
68
92,729 46,365 46,365
272,5/7 136,258 136.258
22,500 11,250 11.250
27.46/ 13,731 13.731
39.043 19.521 19.521
4.089 2.044 2.044
74 37 37
4.722 2,361 2,361
370.405 t85,202 185.202
28.909 14,454 14.454
42.8/0 21,405 21.405
2.830 1.415 1,415
2.937 1,469 1.469
92 46 46
29/ 145 145
65 32 32
/9 10 10
77.952 38.976 38.976
2.188 1,094 1.094
/6.800 8,400 8,400
4./88 2.094 2.094
3.801 1,901 1,901
/.399 700 700
28.377 14.189 14.189
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERYlCE STUDY
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 1001 Actuals
Al1ocated to
Water
Al1ocated to
Wastewater
Maintenance - Buildin.s
Buildings & Grounds
SUBTOTAL
Maintenance
MachineryTools Equipment
Instruments Etc. Radio Maint
Motor Yehicles
Electronic Data Processing-
Maintenance Agreement
Tire Repair
SUBTOTAL
SundrY Charm
Auditing
Safekeeping Fees
Medical Expenses
SUBTOTAL
Buildin.s Structures
Buildings
SUBTOTAL
~
Furniture & Fixtures
Machinery-Tools-Equipmcnt
Motor Yehicles
Communi"tion System
Miscel1aneous
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL BILLING & COLLECTION
Pagd of 14
9,488 4,744 4,744
9,488 4,744 4,744
1,710 1,355 1.355
/.656 828 828
/35 67 67
/7,758 8,879 8,879
22,159 1 t.129 11,129
1,000 1,000 1,000
625 313 313
1,615 1.313 1,313
1,578
7,359
1,289
3,679
1,289
3,679
4,968
4,968
9,937
52/,041
260,521
260,521
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Account Description
Allocated to
Wastewater
Water Production
Personnel Costs
Salaries & Wages
Social Security
TMRS & Pension
Employee Hospitalization Ins
Worker's Compensation Ins
Unemployment Compensation
Overtime
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL
~
Office Supplies
Postage
Food
Wearing Apparel
Motor Vehictes. Gasoline
Motor Vehicles. Oil & Lubricant
MotorVehicles-Tires
Motor Vehicles - Batteries
Minor Apparatus
Laundry Cleaning Ele
Chemical Medical Ele
Mechanical
Botanical Seeds Etc
Other Supplies
Photographic Supplies
Furniture & Fi",ures - Minor
SUBTOTAL
Contractual
Communications - Telephone
Car Allowance
Insurance & Bonds
Court Cost - Special Service Fees
Travel Expenses
Publications
Utilities. Electricity
Freight & Express
Miscellaneous
Associations
Utilities - Water & Gas
Training-Tuition
Building Rental & Maintenance
Testing, Analysis
SUBTOTAL
Page 4 of 14
FY 200/ Actua/,
Allocated to
Water
454.528 454.528
36.88/ 36.881
45.0/4 45.014
6/.275 61,275
/2.480 12,480
23.0/5 23.015
4.554 4.554
637.745 637.745
5.895 5,895
3.392 3.392
300 300
5.94/ 5.941
4.946 4,946
598 598
/.772 1.772
205 205
3./0/ 3.101
/.958 1,958
354.993 354.993
/83 183
/58 158
99 99
383.54/ 383.541
/1./35 11.135
29.395 29.395
3.026 3.026
389 389
49.876 49,876
/26 126
/3.4/9 13.419
3./17 3,117
673 673
3.446 3,446
6.688 6.688
/2/.289 121.289
crTY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Aocount Description
Allocatod to
Wastewat"
FY 200/ Ac/uals
Allocalod to
Walor
Mainlonance - Buildinas
Buildings & Grounds
Bridges & Cutverts
Fillor Beds & Valves
Sidewalks & Curbs
Stonn Sewers
Street & Alley Repairs
Manholes Lampholes Etc
Plant Towers Etc
Meters & Meter Boxes
Service Lines
Hydrnnts & Valves
Oth" - Studge Removal
Screening-Landfill Fees
SUBTOTAL
Maintenance - Eouioment
Furniture & Fixtures
Machinery Tools Equipment
Instruments Etc - Radio Maint
Motor Vehicles
Lease & Rental - Equipment
Pumps & Motors
Electronic Data Processing
Mainlonance Agreement
Tire Repair
SUBTOTAL
Sund" Char...
Judgements Damages Etc
Auditing
Medical Expenses
SUBTOTAL
Buildin.. Structures
Buildings
SUBTOTAL
~
Furniture & Fixtures
Machinery.Tools-Equipment
Instruments & Apparntus
Motor Vehictes
Communication Syslom
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION
PageS of 14
9.189 9.1&9
844 844
85.266 85,266
2/7 211
453 453
66,956 66,956
6.80/ 6,801
2.530 2,530
10.665 10,665
8.683 8,683
/91.603 191,603
445 445
31,957 31,951
3.465 3,465
2.823 2,823
705 105
/5.837 15,831
785 185
794 194
151 151
56.961 56,96t
7.500 1.500
85 85
7.585 1,585
3,044 3.044
3,535 3,535
6,579 6,519
1,405,303 $ 1,405,303
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Account Desoription
Raw Water Supply
Utilities - Electricity
Spe<:ial Project - lake Crook Dam
Operation & Maintenance - Pat Mayes
Water Stor>ge Rights
TOTAL RAW WATER SUPPLY
Water Transmission, DIstribution
Distribution <8"
Transmission 8- to 24-
Transmission >24-
Meters and Meter Boxes
Hydr>nts and Valves
TOTAL WATER TRANSMISSION -DISTRIBUTION
Sewer Maintenance
Personnel Cost
Salaries & Wages
Sociat Security
TMRS & Pension
Employee Hospitalization Ins
Worke~s Compensation rns
Unemployment Compensation
Overtime
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL
~
Office Supplies
Postage
Food
Wearing Apparel
Motor Vehicles - Gasoline
Motor Vehicles, Oil & Lubricant
Motor Vehicles - Tires
Motor Vehicles - Batteries
Laundry Cleaning Etc
Chemicat Medical Etc
Photographic Supplies
SUBTOTAL,
Page 6 of 14
FY 200/ Actuals Allocated to Allocated to
Water Wastewater
458.089 458,089
38.702 38,702
34.356 34,356
49,826 49,826
580,973 580.973
308.038 308,038
675,664 675,664
373.292 373.292
/6/,028 161,028
8,933 8,933
1,526,956 5 1,526,956
/59.975 159,975
/5.198 15,198
/8,550 18,550
25,/60 25,160
3.743 3,743
36,409 36,409
2.283 2,283
261,3/8 261,318
676 676
362 362
258 258
3,365 3.365
/4,967 14.967
1,109 1,109
3.733 3,733
172 172
399 399
6.093 6,093
3/,/36 31,136
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 200/ Actual<
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Contractual
Communications, Telephone
Insurance & Bonds
Court Costs - Special Service Fees
Travel E<penscs
Utilities - Electricity
Freight & E<prcss
Miscellaneous
Associations
Utilities-Water&Gas
Training-Tuition
SUBTOTAL:
Maintenance, Buildin.s
Buildings & Grounds
Sanitary Sewer
Street & Alley Repairs
Manholes Lampholes Etc
Service Unes
Service Force Main
Bridges & Culverts
SUBTOTAL
Maintenance - Eouioment
Furniture & Fi<turcs
Machinery Tools Equipment
Instruments Etc - Radio Maint
Motor Vehicles
Lease & Rental Equipment
Electronic Data Processing
Tire Repair
SUBTOTAL
Sundrv Charm
Judgments Damages Etc
Auditing
Medical Expenses
SUBTOTAL:
Buildin.s - Structures
Sanitary Sewer
Manholes Lampholes Etc
Service Unes
Sewer Mains
SUBTOTAL
Page7ofl4
2.2/3 2.213
3.647 3.647
2.420 2,420
95 95
298 298
2.100 2,100
8/0 810
/1.58/ 11.581
73/ 731
23.378 23.378
171.751 171,751
8.606 8,606
6.392 6,392
1.284 1,284
/96 196
212.337 212,337
27,911 27,911
59/ 591
17.7/3 17,713
2/.095 21,095
344 344
67.654 67,654
500 500
2.000 2.000
306 306
2,806 2.806
2.033 2,033
595 595
4,035 4,035
6.663 6,663
CrTYOFPARlS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Account Description
Allocated to
Wastewater
~
Machine'Y-Tools-Equipment
Motor Vehicles
SUBTOTAL:
Force Account Proiect
Public Works Miscellaneous r & r
SUBTOTAL:
TOTAL SEWER MAINTENANCE
FY 100/ Actuals
1.194
/.194
594,789
Wastewater Treatment
Personnel Cost
Salaries & Wages
Social Sccurity
TMRS & Pension
Employee Hospitalization Ins
Worke~s Compensation rns
Unemployment Compensation
Overtime
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL
Pagegofl4
616.13/
5/.405
61.716
8/.166
9.753
/.653
40.509
5.110
877.761
Allocated to
Water
1.294
1,294
594,789
626,231
51.405
61,726
81.266
9.753
r,653
40,509
5,220
877,762
CrTYOFPARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 200/ Actuals
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
~
Office Supplies
Postage
Food
Wearing Apparel
Motor Vehicles - Gasoline
Motor Vehicles, Oil & Lubricant
Motor Vehicles - Tires
Motor Vehictes - Batteries
Minor Apparatus
Laundry Cleaning Etc
Chemical Medical Etc
Mechanical
Botanical Seeds Etc
Other Supplies
Photographic Supplies
SUBTOTAL
~
Communications - Telephone
Insurance & Bonds
Court Cost - Special Se",ice Fees
Travel Expenses
Publications
Utilities - Electricity
Freight & Express
Miscellaneous
Associations
Utilities-Water&Gas
Training-Tuition
Testing-Analysis
Contractual
SUBTOTAL:
Maintenance - Buildin.s
Buildings & Grounds
Bridges & Culverts
Filter Beds & Valves
Sidewalks & Curbs
Street & Alley Repairs
Manholes Lampholes Etc
Meters & Meter Boxes
Sc<vice Lines
Hydrants & Valves
Other - Sludge Removal
Screening - Landfill Fees
SUBTOTAL
Page90fl4
3.796 3.796
723 723
42/ 421
8.359 8.359
7.693 7.693
609 609
/.354 1.354
/93 193
3.530 3,530
2,744 2.744
94.8/3 94.g13
3.364 3.364
53/ 531
/63 163
/28.292 128.292
2.466 2,466
9.904 9,904
/.744 1.744
284 284
274.289 274.289
167 167
3/.686 31.686
2.557 2.557
1.245 1.245
5.574 5.574
15.996 15,996
345.913 345.913
9.119 9.119
81 81
956 956
210 210
1.448 1.448
220 220
11.356 11.356
8.853 8.853
3,72/ 3,721
35.964 35,964
crTY OF PARIS
WATER Ai'iD WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Account Desoriptian
FY 200/ Actua/,
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Maintenan" ' Eauioment
Furniture & Fi.tures
Machinery Tools Equipment
Instruments Etc ' Radio Maint
Motor Vehicles
Miscellaneous Repair
Lease & Rental, Equipment
Pumps & Motors
Electronic Data Processing
Maintenan" Agreement
Tire Repair
SUBTOTAL:
SundrY Char...
Auditing
Judgement. Damages. Etc.
Medical E.penses
SUBTOTAL:
Eauioment
Machinery-Tools-Equipment
rnstruments & Apparatus
Motor Vehicles
Communication System
Buildings
SUBTOTAL
Total Wastewater Treatment
LIft Station
Personnel Cost
Salaries & Wages
Sociat Security
TMRS & Pension
Employee Hospitalization Ins
Worke~sCompensation Ins
Unemployment Compensation
Overtime
Stability Pay
SUBTOTAL
Page lOafl4
283 283
63.010 63,020
29./84 29.t84
3.993 3.993
154 254
/.635 1.635
/74.3/0 174.310
550 550
540 540
9 9
273.779 273.779
8.500 8.500
295 295
335 335
9./30 9.130
/.27/ 1,271
3.688 3.688
/.503 1,503
6.46/ 6,461
/,677,302 1,677,302
1/8./08 118.108
9.77/ 9,771
1/.926 11.926
/6.649 16,649
/.833 1.833
8.563 8,563
/.056 1,056
/67.906 167.906
crTY OF PARJS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 200t ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 200/ Actuals
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Suoolies
Office Supplies
Postage
Food
Wearing Apparel
Motor Vehicles - Gasoline
Motor Vehicles - Oil & Lubricant
Motor Vehicles - Tires
Motor Vehicles - Baneries
Minor Apparotus
Laundry Cleaning Ele
Chemical Medical Etc
Mechanical
Botanical Seeds Ele
Other Supplies
Photographic Supplies
SUBTOTAL
Contractual
Communications - Telephone
Car Allowance
Insurance & Bonds
Trove! Expenses
Publications
Utilities-Electricity
Freight & Express
Miscellaneous
Associations
Utilities - Water & Gas
Troining - Tuition
Testing-Analysis
SUBTOTAL
Page 11 ofl4
7 7
33/ 331
960 960
3.83/ 3.831
208 208
47 47
6 6
/5 IS
/8 18
15./75 15,175
24 24
20.620 20,620
8.02/ 8,021
(66) (66)
3.460 3.460
237 237
24 24
81.37/ 81,371
676 676
400 400
/.489 1,489
95.6/2 95,612
CtTYOFPARlS
WATER ANI> W ASTEW ATER COST OF SERVICE STUI>Y
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Aeoount Description
FY 2001 Actuals
Alto"ted to
Wot"
Altoc"ed to
W"tew""
Mointenonce - Buildin..
Buildings & Grounds
Bridges & Culverts
Filter Beds & Vatves
Sidewalks & Curbs
Storm Sewers
Street & Alter Repoirs
Meters & Meter Boxes
Hydronts & Valves
Screening. Landfilt Fees
SUBTOTAL
Mointenonce . Eouioment
Furniture & Fixtures
Machinery Tools Equipment
Instruments Elc - Rodio Maint
Motor Vehicles
Leue & Rental, Equipment
Pumps & Motors
Electronic Dolo Processing
Tire Repoir
SUBTOTAL,
Sundrv Chorm
Auditing
SUBTOTAL,
EouiDment
MoIor Vehicles
Instruments & App"""s
Communic"ion System
Buildings
Standpipes & Reservoirs
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL LIFT STATION
Page 120fl4
1.708
1.708
1.394 1.394
50 50
3.153 3,153
2.124 2,124
363 363
425 425
395 395
16.705 16.705
51 51
20,062 20,062
2.000 2,000
2.000 2,000
1.986 1,986
1.986 1,986
3/1,339 311,339
crTY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 2001 Actuals
Allocated to
Wate<
Allocatcd to
Wastcwate<
Debt Service
Debt Service
Wate<works and Sewer System Revenue Bonds Series 1992
Waterworks and Sewe< System Reven", Bonds Series 1994
Waterworks and Sewe< System Revenue Bonds Sedes 1997
Waterworks and Sewe< Sy¡tem Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 1998
Waterworks and Sewer System Revenue Bonds Series 1998
Waterworks and Sewer System Revenue Bonds Series 2000
Waterworks and Sewer System Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2001
Debt or Contingency
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL DEBT SERVrCE
Utility Franchise Fee
Administrative Fees
TOTAL EXPENSES
Revenue Offsets
Sewe<Taps
Water Taps
Misc. Wate< and Sewe<
Sanitation Billing Fee
Service Charges
Bulk Wate< Sales
Sewer Dumping Fees
Wate< and Sewe< Charge Offs
Water and Sewer Returned Checks
Water and Sewe<Copies
Interest Earned
Contract Custome< Billing
SUBTOTAL:
Total Revenue Offsets
Page 130f14
464,220
437,025
711.630
845,679
739.653 554,739 184,913
613,441
3,811.648 $ 2,349.920 1,461,727
3,811,648 2,349,920 t,461,727
345,535 202,914 142,621
750,000 440,435 309.565
11,617,616 6,813,387 4,804,229
13.990 13,990
19.834 19,834
(33,893) (t6,947) (16.947)
75,286 37,643 37,643
76.492 76,492
14.634 7,317 7.317
46,037 46.037
(71.796) (35,898) (35,898)
5,850 2.925 2,925
119 60 60
164.814 82.407 82,407
311,366 173.833 137,533
3/1,366 173,833 \37,533
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERYICE STUDY
FY 2001 ACTUALS
Account Description
FY 200/ Acluals
Allocated to
Water
Allocated to
Wastewater
Other Conlractual Reveoue Offsets
Lamar Power Partners
Surcharge
Mcrico Flow
Merico Sampling & Auditing
Merico Administrative
Total Olher Contraclual Revenue orrsets
Tolal Revenue Requlrem~nt
Pagel40rl4
275,79/ 275,791
208,997 208,997
220,23/ 220,231
14,425 14.425
13,230 13,230
732,674 275,79/ 456,884
/0,573,576 S 6,363,764 S 4,209,8r2
Tenaska III
TABLE B-2
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE MODEL
CONTRACT CUSTOMER BILLING CALCULA nONS
Tenaska Revenue Requirement
Test Year Consumption
Volumetric Rate
Total Revenue
Page2of6
364,286
50,381,822
0.72 PerCCF
364,286
TABLE B-2
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE MODEL
CONTRACT CUSTOMER BILLING CALCULATIONS
Lamar Countv WSD - Transmission
Deoreeiation
Water Treatment Plant in Place at 10/01/84
Assets Placed in Service After 10/1184
Capital Outlays Since 10/1/84
Total Depreeiation
Bond Interest and A2Cnt Fe<:s (Production Related)
1992 WW/SS
1994 CO.
1997 CO.
1998 Tax & Revenue
1998WW/SS
2000 WW/SS
2001 Refunding
Total Bond Interest and Agent Fees
Total Capital Costs
Contractual Amount of Capital Costs
Production O&M
Less Lamar Power Offset
Production O&M Applicable to LCWSD
LCWSD Test Year Sales
Total System Production
Contractual Amount ofO&M
Administrative Charge
Subtotal
Profit
Revenue Requirement
Volumetric Rate
Total Revenue
$
21.0% $
19.9% $
6.5% $
10.0% $
Page30f6
92,418
310.574
15,332
418,324
32,963
117.900
243.430
86,451
480,743
899,067
188,804
1,986,276
67.545
1,918,731
894,694,170 Gallons
4,497,711,000 Gallons
381,678
37,081
607,563
60,756
668,320
0.56 PerCCF
668,320
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE MODEL
CONTRACT CUSTOMER BILLING CALCULA nONS
Lamar Countv WSD - Distributiou
DistributionO&M
Distribution O&M
Less:
MeIer & Meter Boxes
Service Lines
Fire Hydranls & Valves
Total DistribulionO&M
Debt Service (Distribution-Relaled)
1992 WW/SS
1994 c.o.
1997 CO.
1998 Tax & Revenue
1998 WW/SS
2000 WW/SS
2001 Refunding
Total Debt Service
Subtotal
Administrative Charge
Subtotal
Profit
Total Applicable COSls
LCWSD Distribulion Sales
Total System Distribution Sales
Contractual Amount ofO&M
Distribution Rale per CCF
1,526,956
206,269
5.080
23,369
234,719
1,292,237
85,092
90,071
115,222
16t,Ol7
554,739
116.799
1.122,940
2.415,177
6.5% $ 156.987
2,572,164
10.0% $ 257,216
2,829,380
5,838,743
172.935,698
3.4% $ 95,527
1.64
Page4of6
TABLE B-2
TABLE B-2
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE MODEL
CONTRACT CUSTOMER BILLING CALCULATIONS
MJC-WSC
MJC,WSC Test Year Sales
Volumetric Rate
Total Revenue
Page50f6
20,106,315
2.28 PerlOOOGallons
45,842
TABLE B-2
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE MODEL
CONTRACT CUSTOMER BILLING CALCULA nONS
Total Raw Water
Cost or Service
LPP
Cost or Service
Lamar Power Partners
O&M Expense"
Warehouse
Billing & Collecting
Raw Water Production Electricity
O&M - Pat Mayse
Other Raw Water O&M
Water Transmission O&!Io1
Water Transmission Capital Outlay
Water Storage Rights
Spare Parts Cost Directly Related to FP&L Pipeline
O&M Costs Directly Related to FP&L Pipeline
Electricity Costs Directly Related to FP&L Pipeline
Total O&M Expenses
Debt:
Debt Service
10% Debt Service Coverage
Total Debt Service
198,357 4t,707
75,000 15,770
25,000 5,257
288,052 60,567
60,000 12,616
646,409 135,916
33,008 6,940
70.731 14,872
83,744 17.608
187,482 39.421
325,925 68.530
32,592 6,853
358,517 75,383
1,192,409 250,719
5,752.029 1,209,435
0.20730 Per 1,000 Gallons 0.20730 Per 1,000 Gallons
0.02073 Per 1,000 Gallons
0.22803 Per 1,000 Gallons
275,791
Non-Operating Expenses:
PILOT
Administrative Transrer to General Fund
Working Capital- 30 Days
Total Non-Operating Expenses
Total Cost orService
Test Year Raw Water Sales (Ooo's Gallons)
Raw Water Rate
10% Mark-up
FP&L Raw Water Rate
Total Revenue
Page6of6
c
TABLEC-I
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OFSERvrCE STUDY
1001.1001 BUDGET
A"ou", D=ripriou BudS" 2001 - All","" 10 AII"",.dto
2002 W"" W""w""
Wmho...
~
S,I,ri,,&W,g" 71,8PO 35.945 35,945
S",i,1 Suourity MP9 2,750 2.750
TMRS & P.o,ioo 7,088 3.544 3.544
EmploY" Ho'Pitoli"rio., r., 8.400 4.200 4.200
Wolk.(, Comp..".o. I., 3./11 1,561 1.561
U..mploym..t Comp.....o.
StobiHtyP'y TBO 390 390
SUBTOTAL 96.779 48.390 48.390
-
om" Suppli" 1.000 500 500
Po,tog. 200 roo 100
W..ri.gApp",1 300 ISO ISO
Moto,V.hic1"-G",,Ii.. 400 200 200
Molor V.hic1,,-Oil& Lubrieon' 90 45 45
MoloIV.bic1"-Ti,,, 250 125 125
Lou.d", C¡.oni.g Etc 50 25 25
SUBTOTAL 2.290 1.145 1.145
~
Communi...o., - T.I'Pho.. 2.240 1.120 1.120
I.'un.." & Bo",b 1.920 960 960
T,...I Eop..." 300 150 ISO
Uriliri".EI"uidty 750 375 375
Utiliri"-W..",.dG,, 500 250 250
T"i.i.g-Tui.o. 300 150 IW
SUBTOTAL 6,010 3,005 3.005
M,i.".,... - Buildi...
Buildi... & Groun'" 500 250 250
SUBTOTAL 500 250 250
~
Fumilu" & Fiolu'" 75 3g 38
M..hi..",TooI, ,",uipm..t 300 150 ISO
MolulV.hiel" 400 200 200
Eluotro.ie [Jato Proemi.g 5.000 2.500 2.500
SUBTOTAL 5.77J 2.gg8 2,888
P'gol of 12
CITY OF PARr5
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERvrCE STUDY
1001-1001 BUDGET
Aeoount "',.,;p"on
Bud." 200/-
2002
AII""todto
W""
AII"""dto
W,",w""
~
Audl'ng
SUBTOTAL
~
Moohin",,-Toolo-Equlpm,nt
Moto,V,hid"
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL WAREHOUSE
Blliiog & ColI,,"on
I
~
S,lorie, & W'g"
S",i,IS"urity
TMRS & P"",loo
Emplo)", H°'l'i..Ii,,"on' In'
Wolk,'" Compen,,"on rn,
Unemployment Compo",'on
Overtime
S..biJity P'y
SUBTOTAL
~
Office Suppll"
Po,..ge
W"riug App",1
MotolV,hid"-G",,lIn,
Moto' V,hkl" - Oil & Lubri"n'
MototV,hi'I"-TI",,
MotolV,hid"-B,..ri,,
Lound", Cleaning Ele
M"hank,1
SUBTOTAL
~
Communi"rion, - Tel,phone
COt Allowance
I..utance & Bond,
T,ml Exp""'"
Urillri" - EI"tridty
Aosoe"rion'
Urillri,,- W'to,andG"
Ttainlng - Tulrion. Ele.
Consultan..
SUBTOTAL
p,..10r12
200 100 100
200 100 100
5,000 2,500 2.500
5,000 2,500 2,500
1/6,554 5g,171 58,277
2B7,560 143,780 143.780
2/,99B 10.999 10.999
28,345 14.173 14,173
46,200 23,100 23.100
3,500 1.750 1.750
5,1/8 2.559 2.559
392,72/ 196,361 196,361
25,000 12.500 r2,500
48,000 24.000 24,000
/.800 900 900
3,000 1,500 1,500
150 75 75
500 250 250
/25 63 63
75 38 38
78,650 39,325 39.325
2,500 1.250 1,250
/6,800 8,400 8.400
4,500 2,250 2.250
500 250 250
4,500 2,250 2.250
250 125 125
/,300 650 650
200 100 100
30.000 15.000 15.000
60,550 30,275 30.275
CITY OF PARrs
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STIJDY
2001,2002 BUDGET
A"aun' o."riprian
Bud", 2001 .
2002
Allocat,dto
W.",
Allocat,dto
W""wat,,
M.;n"n.." - BuHd;n"
Building. & Ground.
SUBTOTAL
~
M"hin"Y Toob Equ;pmoo'
I..trum"," E". "'dia M.in'
MatotV,hid..
E!,,""ni, D... Proc,..;ng
M.in"n"" A_moo,
SUBTOTAL
~
Audiring
S.r,k'cp;ng Fm
SUBTOTAL
BuHd;n"Stru,tu".
Buildings
SUBTOTAL
~
Furni"", & Fix""..
M"hin"Y.Toob-Equipmoo'
MntotV,hi""
Cammuni"rian S>,,"rn
Mi",II..,aus
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL BrLLING & COLLECTrON
p...3arI2
15,000 7.500 7.500
15,000 7.500 7,500
5,000 2,500 2,500
600 300 300
1,000 500 500
15,000 7.500 7.500
700 350 350
22,300 11,150 11,150
2,000 1,000 1,000
1,200 600 600
3,200 1,600 1.600
572.421
286,211
286,211
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
2001-2002 BUDGET
Aoooo", D=riprion
AII",a"dto
W..I,wa",
Budg" 1001-
1001
AII",a"dto
Wal"
Wal" P,odu,don
~
Salaries & Wages
S",iaIS",.m'Y
TMRS & P,n,ion
Employ.. Ho'pitaU"oon rn,
Wolk,', Comp,nsaoon rn,
Un,mploym,nl Comp,nsation
O"rtime
StabiUty Pay
SUBTOTAL
~
om" SoppUes
Po,tag,
Food
Wearing Appml
Motol VeUie!es - GasoUne
MotorVehloles,OIl&Luhricanl
Motor Vehicles - Ti",
MotorV,hie!es-Battories
Minol Appm""
loondry Cleaning Eto
Ch,mica! Modical Eto
M",hanical
Botanical S.."' Eto
Oth" SoppUes
Photogtaphi, SoppUes
Fomitute&Flx....s-Minol
SUBTOTAL
~
Commonicaoons - T,lephooe
Car Allow.."
lusomo" & Boo",
CoortCost - Spedal Servlo, Fm
Tmvel Eap..ses
Poblloaoous
UoUoes - EI"tridty
...ighl & Eap"ss
Mis"I1.."..
Ass",iaoous
UoUoes-Wa",&G..
Ttainiog - Toiooo
Bollding R..tal & Maio"n.."
Tesliog-Analysis
SUBTOTAL
Page 4 orr2
480,171 480,271
38,718 38,718
49,901 49.902
71,400 71,400
/3,855 13,855
1,000 2.000
10,000 10,000
5.165 5,165
671,3/1 671.311
5.500 5,500
5.500 5.500
100 100
7,000 7,000
5,000 5,000
700 700
1,000 1.000
500 500
7,000 7,000
1,500 2,500
400,000 400,000
100 100
150 250
700 700
300 300
500 500
436,650 436.650
11.000 12,000
19,000 29.000
1,500 2,500
1,000 1.000
73,731 73,732
250 250
IJ,ooo 15,000
1,500 2.500
6,000 6,000
7,000 7,000
10,000 10.000
158,981 158,982
CITY OF PARrs
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
1001,1001 BUDGET
A"oont D,"riptlo.
Alloc"od 10
W","'.."
M,'.".'." - Bulldi...
Bulldi.g, & Grou.d,
Bridg.. & Cui..",
Fil",¡¡'<h & V,I",
Sld,w,lb & Curb,
Slonn S,w,,"
S.....&AII'yR'p,in
M,.hol.. lomphol.. Ele
P¡,.tTowmE"
M,"n&M.."Bom
S""k, li...
Hyd"... & V,lv"
0"" - Siudg' R,mova'
Smonl.g-lo.dfill Fm
SUBTOTAL
M,I.lon,." - Eoulom'.1
Fuml.." & Fl...",
M"hl."" Tool, £qulpmont
r.,trum'." Ele - Radio M,i.t
Motor V,hid..
[,em & R,...I- Equipm,.t
Pump, & MaIO"
EI"oo.k D,.. P,ocmi.g
M,'.".'." Agro,m'.t
T'"R,p'"
SUBTOTAL
~
ludg,m,... D","g" Ele
Auditi.g
SUBTOTAL
Bulldl... Stru,..",
Bulldi.g,
SUBTOTAL
~
Fumi.." & Fi,"r..
Ma,hi."y'Tool,-Equipm'.t
r.strum.u.. & App",""
Molo,V,hid"
Commu.i"tlo. S>,,"m
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL WATER PRODucrroN
P'g. 5 of11
Bud", 2001-
2002
Alloc",dlO
W""
15,000
500
25,000
1,000
250
5,000
/,000
40,000
7,000
5,000
10,000
15.000
500
25,000
1,000
250
5.000
1,000
40.000
7.000
5,000
10.000
109,750 109,750
600 600
30,000 30,000
5,000 5.000
3,000 3,000
500 500
30,000 30,000
1.500 2.500
1,000 1.000
500 500
73,/00 73.100
7.500 7.500
7.500 7,500
70,000 70.000
70,000 70.000
12,750 12.750
2,500 2.500
58,000 58,000
73,250 73,250
1.600,541 S 1,600,543
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERvrCE STUDV
2001,2002 BUDGET
Aocoon' !)osorip.on
B"dget 1001-
1001
All"""", 10
W""
AlIoco"" 10
Wo"ewo'"
Row Wo'" S"pply
u,m,ies - Electridty
Spedol Proj,,'- uke C",k Dom
00"'.0' & Moint,""" ' Pot Moyes
W"" SIO"gelUgh~
TOTAL RAW WATER SUPPLY
Wo'" T,mmt..to', m,t,tb"tio'
Di,trih",io' <goo
T"n,mi..io, goo 10 24"
T"..mi"io, >24"
Mele" ..d Met" 80m
Hyd",~..d Volm
TOTAL WATER TRANSMrSSION "DISTRIBUTION
Sewer Moln',",""
~
So'ories & Woges
SocioIS",rity
TMRS & Pe"ion
Employee Ho'pi"liu.o, r..
Wo,ke~' Comp,"".on ¡..
Unemployment Comp,"".o,
O".ome
S"hmtypoy
SUBTOTAL
~
om" S'pplies
Po"'ge
Food
W"ri'g App"el
MolO,Vehicles-G""line
MolO' Vehicles - Oil & Lobri",'
Motee Vehicles - Tim
MOIO,Vchicles-&tteries
uond'Y Cl",i'g Ele
Chemi,,1 M",I,,¡ Etc
Photognphlc S'pplies
SUBTOTM,.,
pogc60rl2
458,089 458,089
15,000 25.000
75,000 75,000
60,000 60,000
618,089 618,089
280,310 280.310
585,79/ 585,791
323,639 323,639
100,000 100,000
1.289.741 S 1.289.74!
186,282 186,2'2
16.806 '6.'06
21,665 21,665
29,400 29,400
3,600 3,600
2,000 2.000
40,000 40,000
1,535 2,535
302,288 302,288
700 700
200 200
250 250
3,000 3,000
15,000 15,000
1,500 1,500
J,j00 1.500
400 400
1,000 1,000
5,000 5.000
500 500
29.050 29,050
CITYOFPARrS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERvrCE STUDY
2001,2002 BUDGET
A"ount "',,"prion
Budg" 1001 -
. 1001
An",a"dto
Wa'"
An",a"dto
W.."w,",
~
Communioario", - T,I,phono
I",~'n" & Bood,
Court Co," - Sp,dal S",,;o, F",
T,,!Vet E.peos"
VriHri"-EI,,tri,ity
F«lght & E.p""
Mi"etlan<ous
Ass",iarion'
VriHri".Wa",&G..
T",inin, - Tuirion
SUBTOTAL,
Main'","" - Bundin..
Bundin.. & Grounds
Sanitary Sew"
Stt<et & An,y R",ai"
Manhol" umphol" Ele
S'M" Lio"
SeM" Fo"" Main
SUBTOTAL
M,in"n"'" - Eouiom'n'
Furni""" & Fi""'"
M"hin,ry Tool, Equipm'n'
rn"rum,n" Ele - Radio M,in'
Moto,V,hic1"
U.., & R,ota! Equipm,",
E!"ttool, D'ta Proc",io,
Ti«R'p,l,
SUBTOTAL
~
ludgm,n" D'm'", Ele
Audirin,
M,dioal ""p,n",
SUBTOTAL,
Bundin.. - Stru,to",
S,nitaryS,w"
M'nhol" umphol" Ele
S""I"Liri"
S,w"M,in,
SVBTOTAL
~
M"hin"Y-Toob-Equipm'nt
Mo,..v.hic1"
SUBTOTAL,
rag' 7 om
1,000 2,000
5,000 5,000
400 400
1,500 2.500
400 400
1,400 1.400
1,000 1.000
/1,700 12.700
800 800
10,000 20,000
50,OIJ{) 50.000
5,000 5.000
5,000 5,000
6.0IJ{) 6,000
86,800 86,800
100 100
30,500 30,500
I,OIJ{) 1,000
20,000 20.000
30,000 30.000
100 100
600 600
81,300 82,300
1,000 1,000
1,000 2,000
2,000 2.000
5,000 5.000
10,000 10,000
10.000 10.000
20,OIJ{) 20,000
78,500 78,500
78,500 78,500
crTYOFPARlS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERvrCE STUDY
2001-2002 BUDGET
A"o,"' [)eseriprion
Budge/2oo1 -
2002
Allo""d te
W..~
AII",..odte
W.."w..~
Fol" A"o,"' Prol«,
PubHe Wo"" Mlse,II,"eou' r & r
SUBTOTAL,
TOTAL SEWER MArNTENANCE
W,stew.... T/,,'m,"'
~
S,I,ries&W'ges
S",I,IS"urity
TMRS & Pe",lo"
Employee Hospl"ll"rio" I",
Wolk,'s Comp,...rio" I",
U",mpIo,,"e"' Comp,""rio"
O",um,
S"b;!;tyP,y
SUBTOTAL
-
om" SuppHes
Po,"ge
Food
W"ri"g AppmI
Mo",Vehkles-O,soH",
Mote/V,hlcles -Oil & Lubri,,"'
Mote/V,hlcles-Tlte,
Moto/V,hlcles-s.",ries
MI"ol Appmtu'
Lau"dry CI,,"I"g Eto
Chemk,1 Medl,,1 Eto
M"h"I,,1
Bo""I,,1 Seeds Eto
Oth~ Supplies
Phote""phk SuppII"
SUBTOTAL
~
Commu"k,rio", - Tel'pho",
I"su"",, & Bo"ds
Court Cost - Speel,1 S",i" F'"
T""I Exp'"se,
Publl"rio"s
UriHri"-EI,,oieity
Ftelgb' & Expte"
Mlse,II,",o",
Assocl,rio",
Urillri,,-W....&O..
T"I"I"g - Tulrio"
Tesri"g-Ao"Y'I,
SUBTOTAL,
p,.. 8 ofI2
616,638
616.638
688,727 688.727
55,525 55,525
7U67 71.567
105,000 105.000
10,285 10.285
3,000 3,000
16,000 16.000
6,120 6.120
956,224 956,224
J,JOO 5,500
1,050 1,050
500 500
8,200 8,200
11,000 11.000
500 SOD
1,500 1.500
140 240
9,000 9,000
3,650 3,650
80,000 80,000
2,000 2,000
750 750
750 750
550 550
125,190 125.190
3,000 3.000
9,900 9.900
2,000 2,000
500 500
235.000 255.000
250 250
36,000 36,000
3,000 3,000
2,800 2.800
5,500 5,500
20,000 20,000
337,950 337.950
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
2001-2002 BUDGET
A"ounl De","ption
Budget 2001 -
2002
Allocotedto
W"u
Alloc"edto
W"tew"u
Mo;ntenonce - BuHdin..
BuHdings & Grounds
Bridges & Culverts
FHtu Beds & Vol",
Sidewolks & Cu,bs
SUeel & Alley Repoi"
Manboles Lompholes Ete
Met'" & Metu 80",
Semce Unes
Hyd"n~ & Volves
Oth" - Sludge Removol
S",ening - Londfill Fees
SUBTOTAL
Mointenonce - Eouiome",
Furo;tu..&Fixtu..s
Maeh;nery Tools Equipment
Instrumen~ Ete - Radio Mainl
Moto,Yehicles
Miscelloneous Repoi,
Le... & Rental - Equipmeol
Pumps & Moto"
Electronic Dota !'roo",ing
Mointenon« A",ement
Ti..Repoi,
SUBTOTAL,
~
Auditing
SUBTOTAL,
~
M"hinery.Tools.Equipment
Instrumen~ & App",tus
Moto,Yehicles
Communkotion S>"lem
BuHdings
SUBTOTAL
Totol Wo.tewote, T,..lmeot
Pogo 9 or 12
31,000 31,000
225 m
7,500 7,500
500 500
7,gOO 7,gOO
250 250
250 250
1,250 1.250
16,000 16.000
12,000 12,000
8,500 8.500
85,275 g5,275
2,000 2.000
50,500 50.500
32,500 32.500
6,500 6,500
500 500
3,300 3,300
72,000 72.000
1,500 1.500
800 gOO
100 100
169,700 169,700
8,500 g,500
8,500 8,500
24,000 24,000
6,800 6,800
8,000 8,000
40,000 40,000
78,800 78,800
1,761,639 S 1,'61,6J9
CITYOFPARrS
WATER AND W ASTEW A TER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
2MI.2002 BUDGET
A«ount De~riprion
Budget 2001 -
2002
AII",a"dto
Wat"
AII",a"dto
W,,"wa",
UftSlltion
~
Salari" & Wag"
S",'oIS"urity
TMRS & Pension
Employ" Hospitan"rion rns
Wo,kds Comp'nsarion rns
Un,mploym,nl Comp,nsarion
Ovo<rim,
StabilIty Pay
SUBTOTAL
~
om" suppn"
Postag,
Food
Wonring Appuel
Motot V,hid" - Gnsonn'
MototV,hld" -Oil & Lubri"nt
Moto,V,hid,,-TI«s
MoIO.V,hld"-Bo.,ri,,
MInot AppOto""
(aundry Clon.'.g [to
Ch,ml,,1 M,d"ol [to
M"hon"ol
Botani,,1 S"d> [to
Oth" SUPPn"
Photognphio suppn"
SUBTOTAL
Connaoluo!
Communi"rions - ToI",hon,
COt Allowon..
rnSUtOn" & Bonds
T.ml Exp"",
Pubn"rions
Urinri"-E!,,tri"ty
F«lght & E,p«..
Mlsu,IJanuous
Assouiorions
Urinri,,-w..,,&Gns
TtOlning - Tuirion
T"ring - Anolysls
SUBTOTAL
Page 10 of12
103,711 103,721
8,8/6 8.816
11,364 11,364
16.800 16.8M
/.JJj 1.555
I,OGO 1,000
10,000 10,000
J.200 1,200
154,457 154,457
400 400
/50 150
50 50
J.200 1.2M
3,000 3,000
400 400
600 600
/50 150
250 250
200 200
15,750 15,750
100 1M
100 100
100 100
100 100
22,550 22,550
7,250 7,250
3.500 3,500
500 5M
300 300
80,000 80,000
/50 150
/.JOO r.500
300 300
1,500 1,500
750 750
500 500
'0,250 '6,250
CrTYOFPARlS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
2001-2002 BUDGET
Account De",rip"on
Budget 200/-
2002
Allneatedto
W""
Allne"ed 10
W"tew""
Ma;ntenance - Build;n..
Buildings & Grounds
Bridgos & Culve'"
Fillet Be"'& Valvos
Sidewalks & Curbs
Stonn Sew",
S..er & Aney Repa;rs
MeretS & Mer" Bom
Hydrsnu & Valves
Smen;ng - Landfill Fees
SUBTOTAL
Maintenance - Fouloment
Fumitute&FõxlUtes
Moohi",')' Too~ Equipme"
rnslrumenU Ele - Radio Maint
MotorVehides
Le"e & Rental- Equipment
Pumps & Motors
EI"lruni, Da.. ",neessing
TiteRepair
SUBTOTAL
~
Audi"ng
SUBTOTAL
~
Molot Veh;des
InslrumenU & Appa"tns
Comm""i,,"on System
Buildings
Standpipes & ResetVo;rs
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL LIFT STATION
Debt Sm""
Debt Servi"
Wale<works and Sew" System Revenue Bonds Series 1992
W"....otks ond Sew" System Revenue Bonds Series 1994
Wate<wotks and Sew" System Revenue Bonds Series 1997
W"e<works and Sew" System Revenue Refund;ng Bonds Series 1999
W"....orks and Sew" System Revenue Bonds Series r998
Wate<wotks and Sew" System Revenue Bonds Series 2000
Wate<wotks and Sew" System Revenue Refund;ng Bonds Series 200 I
Debt 0' Con"ngen,y
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE
U"Hey F"""hise Fee
Adm;n;s"'"ve Fees
TOTAL EXPENSES
Page II ofl2
/0.000 10.000
500 500
500 500
500 500
500 500
500 500
500 500
3,000 3,000
5,000 5,000
1/,000 21,000
250 250
9,000 9,000
3,000 3,000
2,000 2,000
350 350
/7.500 17.500
250 250
75 75
32,'25 32.425
2,000 2,000
2,000 2.000
',000 4,000
8.000 8,000
/2,000 12,000
340,682 340.682
'6',no
437,025
7/1,630
845,679
739,653
6/3,4</
554.739 184,913
S 2.349.920 S 1.461,727
2.349,920 t,46t,n7
203,736 146,264
436,577 m.423
6,843,094 4,9S4,861
3,BII,6'8
J.811,648
350.000
750,000
11,827.955
crTY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
2001-2002 BUDGET
A"ountDm"p"on
An",a"dto
Wa",w""
Rev,"ue Off.."
S,w" Tap,
Wa'"Tap,
Mi". Wa""nd S'w"
Sanimrion Billing Fe<
S""k,Ch"g"
BulkWa",Sal"
S,w" Dumping Fm
Wa",and 5<w"Ch"go Off,
Wa", and S,w" a'tuoi,d Ch"k,
Wa",and5<w"Copi"
rnt"", "rn,d
Con"" Custom" BiIHng
SUBTOTAL
Total ReveD", Off.."
Oth.. Contm'u,1 Rmnue Off.."
Lam" Pow" Pann",
Su.ch"g"
M,",o Aow
Mo",o Sampling & Audiring
Mori,o Admini,..ôvo
Total Olh.. CDntmtu,1 Rmn", Off""
Tot,1 Rovenu, Roqu¡"m,"t
PagoI2of"
Budget 200/-
2002
An",a"dto
Wa",
/4.500 14.500
20,000 20,000
74,385 37,193 37,193
70,000 35,000 35,000
10,000 10,000
55,000 55,000
(60.0001 (30,000) (30.000)
6,900 3.450 3,450
85 43 43
80,000 40,000 40,000
270,870 115,685 155,185
270,870 115.685 l55,t85
275,791 275,791
208,997 208,997
220,231 220.231
14.425 14,425
13.230 13.230
732,674 27S,79r 456.884
S 10,8U.410 $ 6.4Sr.6r8 $ 4,372.792
TABLEC-2
crTYOF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
BASE-EXTRA CAPACITY METHOD - BUDGET
"'0 Cop,,;', E...-Cop Cooto"", COOlom~
A"o~ID, . lIon Bnd " Buo% Bu, AlI",orion % AlI",orion C"'"% COO"
W",hoo",
~
Solori" & Wog" 35,945 100.00% 35,945 0.00% 0.000/.
S",~IS_1y 2,750 100.00% 2.750 0.00% 0.00%
TMRS & P=loo 3,544 100.00% 3,544 0.00% 0.00%
Emplo", Ho",ial;,.rio", 1m 4,200 100.00% 4,200 0.00% 0.00%
W".",.Cornp""oriooln> 1.561 100.00% 1,561 0.00% 0.000/.
UoornployrnoolCOrnpOO..rioo 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
SabililyPs, 390 100.00% 390 0.00% 0.000/.
100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% O,()O% 0.00%
SUBTOTAL ",3'" ",390
s..m
Offi"Snppll" 500 100.000/. 500 0.00% 0.00%
P","g' 100 100.00% 100 0.00% 0.00%
W,uingApp=' ISO lOO.OO'~ ISO 0.00% 0.000/.
Moto.V,hld,,-Guolin, 200 100.00% 200 O.OO'~ O.OO'~
Mnto. V,hld,,-Q;I & Lohri"'1 05 100.00% 05 0.00% 0.00%
Moto<V,hid,,-T... 125 100.00% 125 O.OO'~ O.OO'~
'-'~""CI,..ing Efc 25 100.00% 25 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 0.00% O.OO'~
100.00% 0.00% 0.000/.
SUBTOTAL 1.105 1,145
~
Co~~i"rio",-T"nphooo 1,120 100.000/. 1,120 0.000/. 0.00%
10.-,,& Boo'" 960 100.000/. 960 0.00'/. 0.00%
Tlml E.,.....> ISO loo.OO'~ ISO 0.00% 0.00%
Urillri"-EI,,tridly J7S 100.00% J7S 0.000/. 0.00%
Uriliri"-W",,..dGu 250 100.000/. 250 O.OO'~ 0.00%
Tnining - Tnirion ISO 100.00'~ ISO 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 0.00% 0.00'/.
100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 3,005 3,005
Msin"".."-Bnildin,,
Bnilding,&GIO~'" 250 100.000/. 250 0.00% 0.000/.
100.00% 0.000/. 0.00%
100.00% 0.00'/. 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 250 250
~
F=i..' & Pi..." " 100.00'~ " 0.00% 0.00'/.
M"hin",Too"Eqnip~1 ISO 100.00% ISO 0.00% 0.00%
M""V,hid" 200 100.00% 200 O.OO'~ 0.00%
EI"noni, Doa ""...ing 2,500 100.000/. 2,500 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 0.00% 0.000/.
100.00% 0.00% O.OO'~
SUBTOTAL 2",g 2",g
~
Anditing 100 100.00% 100 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
100.00'~ 0.00% 0.000/.
SUBTOTAL 100 100
-.-
M"hin",-TooI~Eqnip~1 2,500 100.000/. 2~00 0.000/. 0.00%
Mot"V,hid" 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 0.00% O.OO'~
100.00% 0.00% 0.000/.
SUBTOTAL 2,500 2,500
TOTAL WAREHOUSE ",217 ".217
P,g" or5
A"o~' D""'o.oo
CrTYOFPARJS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERyrCE STUDY
BASE-EXTRA CAPACITY METHOD- BUDGET
Em C..."'" .....C., C...."'" C"'o"",
B,d", B~% B~Allo"'o, % AII",..oo CO"' % CO"'
143,780 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 143,780
10,999 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 10,999
14,173 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 14,173
23,100 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 23,100
1,730 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 1,730
0.00% 0.000/0 100.00%
0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2,559 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 2,559
0.00% 0.000/0 100.00%
0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
196,361 I96~6I
12,500 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 12.500
24,000 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 24,000
900 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 900
1,500 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 1.500
73 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 75
2SO 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 2SO
63 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 63
" 0.00% 0.00% 100.000/. "
0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
0.000/. 0.00% 100.00%
39,325 39.325
1,2SO 0.00% 0.00"10 100.00% 1,2SO
8,400 0.00% 0.00"10 100.00% 8,400
2,2SO 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 2,2SO
2SO 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 2SO
2,2SO 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 2,2SO
12S 0.000/. 0.00% 100.00% 125
650 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 650
100 0.00% 0.000/. 100.00% 100
",000 0.000/. 0.00% 100.00% ",000
30,275 30,275
7,'00 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 7.500
0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
7,500 7,SOO
2,500 0.00% 0.000/. 100.00% 2~00
300 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 300
500 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 500
7,500 0.00% 0.000/. 100.00% 7.500
350 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 350
0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
II,ISO II,ISO
1,000 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 1.000
600 0.000/. 0.00% 100.00% 600
0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1,600 1,600
0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
0.000/. 0.00% 100.00%
0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
I
~
S,',,;,,&.W'8"
Sod,IS<=ri",
TMRS &. P,",lo,
Emplo,.. H...i"lIn'o.. In,
W""..., Com....,.o, In,
U""'PI,Y"""' Comp,"y'O'
O""'m,
S"bill",P,y
BIIII,< &. ColI,ctlo,
SUBTOTAL
S!oRJilig
om"S'ppll"
Po"'g'
WooringApl"'ol
Mo..,Y,lrid"-G",,,1in,
Mo..,Y,bld"-Q;I&.L,bri",,,
Mo",Y,lrid,,-T...
Mo""Y,bld"-B,.ori,,
L."'dryClomingEk
M"iw>i",
SUBTOTAL
~
Co=",I"'o..-T",,,b,",
CM Allow"""
1m_" &. Boo'"
T""I Ex"",,,
U'II'"-EI".;",,,
""0""00'
U'II'".W.""..dGu
T"ining. T,I.o" Ek.
Co",I",,"
SUBTOTAL
M,in."..".8";ld;,,,
B,lIdin..&.Grooo'"
SUBTOTAL
~
M"bin"" Too' E,,;pm,"'
In"""",",, Ek. R,di. M,in.
M.""Y,bld"
EI,,"",I, D," ,,",,'ning
M,in...""'A""",,",
SUBTOTAL
~
A,dlring
s,r"""ing""
SUBTOTAL
B,ildin"S""""",
B,lIding'
SUBTOTAL
P'g' 2 0"
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERyrCE STUDY
BASE.EXTRA CAPACITY METHOD, BUDGET
E,'" c,p",,>, E,"'.cop C~to~ C~'om~
A",,~,D, .... Bod" B~% B~AII~.aon % AII~.ann C..u% c..u
WiRmm!
F=i..,"-Fix""" 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
M"hm"Y.TooI~Eqo;pm"" 0.00"1. 0.00% 100.00"/.
MoI..V,hid" 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Comm~k'a.. S,.."," 0.00"1. 0.00% 100.00%
MiK,lIm"'~ 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
0.00% 0.00% 100.00"1.
0.00% 0.00% 100.00"/.
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL BILLlNG"- COLLECTION 286,211 286,211
W.." Prod,,"on
~
S.I.,;",,- W'S" 480;11 60.32% 289,707 ".6S% 190,"" 0.00%
S~i.IS"uri,>, 3&,718 60.32% 2),'" )9.6S% 1S,36) 0.00%
TMRS "- p",.lnn 49,902 60.)2% )0,102 )9.6S% 19,800 0.00%
EmploY" Ho'Piul",ann I.. 11,400 60.32% 4).070 )9."% 28,330 0.00%
W..k,ÒCo"""""aon In. \3,'" 60.32% 8.'" )9.68% ',497 0.00%
U~mploym"" Cnmp<nya.. 2,000 60.32% 1,206 )9."% 794 0.00"1.
O-m' 10,000 60.32% 6,032 )9."% ),9" 0.00%
Subili,>, P.y ',16S 60.32% ),116 )9."% 2,049 0.00%
60.32% ".6S% 0.00"/.
60.32% ".6S% 0.00"1.
SUBTOTAL 611,)11 404.946 266~6S
~
om" Suppli" ','OIl 60.32% ),31S ".68% 2,182 0.00%
P..US' '.'00 60.32% )~18 )9.68% 2,182 0.00%
Food lOll 60.32% 60 ".,,% 40 0.00%
W_SApp"'l 7,000 60.32% 4;23 ".,,% 2,777 0.00"1.
Mnto,Vdud".G...lm, ',000 60.32% ),016 ".68% 1,984 0.00%
Mnto' V ,hid". Oil "-Lobri'ml 700 60.32% 422 ".68% '" 0.00%
Moto,V,hid".T1= 1.000 60.32% 60) ".,,% )97 0.00%
Mo...V,hid".B'"m" SOO 60.32% )02 ".,,% 198 0.00%
Mm..App""" 7,000 60.32% 4,223 ".,,% 2,777 0.00"/.
'-'~dry CI=mS EI< 2,'00 60.32% 1.'08 ".,,% "2 0.00%
Ch<mi"IM,di"IEI< 400,000 100.00% 400.000 0.00"1. 0.00%
M"hmi,,1 100 60.32% 60 ".,,% 40 0.00%
Bo...i"IS,,"'EI< 2SO 60.32% ISI 39."% " 0.00%
Oth~Suppli" 700 60.32% 422 ".,,% 278 0.00"/.
Photosnph;, Suppli" )00 60.32% 181 ".,,% 119 0.00"/.
F=i.., "-Fix..",. Mm.. '00 60.32% "2 ".6S% 198 0.00%
60.32% ".,,% 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 436,6SO 422,108 14,'42
~
Comm~i"ao",' T'I<ph.., 12,000 60.32% 7.2" ".,,% 4,761 0.00%
C~ Allowm" 60.32% ".,,% 0.00%
In""m" "- B..", 29,000 60.32% 17,493 ".,,% II,SO7 0.00%
Court C..,. Sp"i.1 S""i" F= 60.32% ".,,% 0.00%
T.."IE,p"'~ 2,'00 60.32% I,'OS ".,,% "2 0.00%
Publi"a.., 1,000 60.32% 603 ".,,% "7 0.00%
Ualia".EI"tri"'>' 73,732 60.32% 44.477 ".68% 29,'" 0.00%
F";Sh' "- Exp"" 2SO 60.32% .,1 ".,,% " 0.00%
M",dlm..~ IS.OOO 60.32% 9,048 ".,,% ','" 0.00"1.
A..od.ao.. 2,'00 60.32% I.SO8 ".,,% "2 0.00"/.
Ualia".W."",-G" 60.32% ".,,% 0.00%
T..mmS' Toia.. 6,000 60.32% ),619 )9.6S% 2,)81 0.00%
BoildmS R",ul "- M.m'",.." 7.000 60.32% 4,223 ".,,% 2,777 0.00%
T"rinS.An.I,..;, 10,000 60,32% 6,032 ".6S% )."S 0.00%
60.32% ".68% 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 1S8,982 ",901 63,OS2
P'S"of'
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDV
BASE-EXTRA CAPACITY METHOD. BUDGET
E,u. C.p.dty Em,C'F Cw'o~ Cw'om~
A"~tD"," rioo BwI" B~% B~ AII".rioo % AII".rioo Co.. % Co..
M.iolm~'" Bu;ldio..
Buildiog.&G,o~'" 1S.000 60.32% "t).!g ".68% '.952 0.000/.
Bridg" & CuI"", '00 60.32% 302 ".6g% 198 0.00%
F;It~ B"" & V.I". 2',000 60.32% 1S,080 3'.6g% ','20 0.00%
S;d<w.lk> & Cmb. 1.000 60.32% 603 ".68% 397 0.00%
SIo~S~~ 250 60.32% ISI ".68% 99 0.00%
So", & All" R'P'" ',000 60.32% 3.016 3'.6'% 1,984 0.00%
M~hol" '-'mpOOI" Eœ 1,000 60.32% 603 ".6'% "7 0.00%
FI~tTo"",Eœ 40,000 60.32% 24.12' ".68% 1S,'7I 0.00%
M"~& M,"'Bo,," 7,000 60.32% 4,223 ".68% 2,777 0.00%
S.m"Lio" ',000 60.32% 3.016 ".6'% 1.984 0.00%
H,""".&V.I", 10,000 60.32% 6,032 ".6'% 3,'68 0.000/.
Oth~. Siudg' R,m.,.1 60.32% ".68% 0.00%
S=io,.Laudfill F", 60.32% ".68% 0.00%
60.32% 39.68% 0.00%
60.32% ".6'% 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 109.750 66.203 43,'47
M.;o'm~,,-Eoulomml
Furnl"",&Fi"""" 600 60.32% 362 ".6'% 238 0.00%
M"hio"" Tool. Equ;pmm' 30,000 60.32% IS,O'6 ".6'% 11,'04 0.00%
In.""""". Eœ. R.d;oM.iol '.000 60.32% 3,016 39.68% 1,984 0.00%
Molo,V,hld" 3.000 60.32% 1,810 ".6'% 1,190 0.00%
L_&Rm.I-Equ;F~1 '00 60.32% 302 ".68% 198 0.00%
Pump, & Molon 30,000 60.32% 1S,O96 ".6'% 11,'04 0.00%
EI~""u;, D.. ,,",...iog 2,'00 60.32% 1,'0' ".6'% 992 0.00%
M.io"'~"A"""", 1,000 60.32% 603 ".6'% "7 0.00%
T"'R'P" '00 60.32% 302 ".6'% 19' 0.00%
60.32% ".6'% 0.00%
60.32% ".6'% 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 73,100 44.095 29,00'
~
Judg,mm. Domag" Eo< 60.32% ".6'% 0.00%
AwI;,iog 7,'00 60.32% 4,>24 39.68% 2,976 0.00%
60.32% ".6'% 0.00%
60.32% ".6'% 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 7,'00 4,>24 2.976
Buildio..S""""",
Buildio" 70,000 60.32% 42.22> ".68% 27,775 0.000/.
60.32% 39.6'% 0.00%
60.32% ".68% 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 70,000 42,225 27,775
~
Furnl... & F;xna" 60.32% ".6'% 0.00%
M"hio"".Tool~Equ;Fmm' 12,750 60.32% 7,691 ".6'% ',0" 0.000/.
In.uumm. & AppM"" 2.'00 60.32% 1,'0' ".6'% 992 0.00%
Molo,V,hld" 58,000 60.32% 34.987 ".68% 23,013 0.00%
Co~~I",rioo S",= 60.32% ".6'% 0.00%
60.32% ".6'% 0.00%
SUBTOTAL 73~'0 44,1S6 29,064
TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION 1.600,543 1,12',187 476~'6
Row W.." Supply
Uriltri".EI"uidty '58,0"' 100.000/. '58,0"' 0.00% 0.00%
Sp«i.IP,oj",-L.k,C=kD.m 25,000 100.000/. 25,000 0.00';" 0.00%
Op=rioo&M.io...~".P..M.", 75,000 100.000/. 75,000 0.00% 0.000/.
W.'" S'~g' Righ. 60,000 100.00% 60,000 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 0.000/. 0.00%
100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL RAW WATER SUPPLY 61S,'" 618,0"
F.g,'of>
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERyrCE STUDY
BASE-EXTRA CAPACITY METHOD, BUDGET
E,.. Copooily E,tto.Cop C~toma C~toma
Bod" B~% B~AII~orio. % Allo"ri.. CO," % Co,"
2S0,310 60.32% 169,OSS 39.6S% 111,223 0.00%
5S5,791 60.32% m,m 39.6S% 232,433 0.00%
323,639 60.32% I9S~24 39.68% 128.41S 0.00%
100,000 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100,000
0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
'~89.741 117.671 472,070 100,000
2,349.920 ".78% 1,54S,174 J4.IS% 802,394 0.07% 1,752
203,136 100.00% 203,136 0.00% 0.00%
436,577 100.00% 436,577 0.000/. 0.00%
6.543,094 4.704,311 1.750,820 387,962
20,000 100.00% 20,000 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 0.000/. 0.00%
37,193 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 37,193
35.000 100.00% 35,000 0.00% 0.000/.
10,000 100.00% 10,000 0.00% 0.00%
(30,000) 100.00% (30,000) 0.00% 0.000/.
3,4SO 0.00% 0.00% 100.000/. 3.450
4J 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 4J
40,000 100.00% 40,000 0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
I IS,"S 75,000 40.685
115,685 75.000 40.685
27S.791 100.00% 27S,791 0.00% 0.00%
27S,791 27S.791
6.451.618 4,353,520 1,750,820 341,277
A=""' D..m ri..
W.", T"..ml,,'oo - O"'nbolloo
Oi'lnòunoo <S'
Tlm'mi"i..S'",,'
T'm=i"ioo>24'
M"",md M"a Bo",
Hy",,""mdVo""
TOTAL WATER TRANSMISSION - DISTRIBUTION
O,b,S""I<,
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE
U",ilyF"",bi",F~
Admini,..ri" Fon
TOTAL EXPENSES
Rmou, OIr.."
W"aT.p'
Mi".Wo"'mdS~a
Smimri.. Billin8 F~
S~i~ C""S"
BolkW.."S.I"
Wo",..dS~aC"""OfT,
W.",..dS~aR'Iurn"'Cb~ks
W.",..dS~aCop;"
1n1"",E~'"
Co."" C~tom« Billin,
SUBTOTAL,
To"l Rmou, OfT.."
Olb" Coolml..1 Rmo.. OfT....
um.. Powa p""""
Tot,1 Olb" Cool""..1 Rmou, OfT.."
To'" Rmou, R'qol~m'ol
Po," of!
Item Total Residential Comme'cial Campbell Soup Tenaska 111 LCWSD
O&M E.oenses
Supply 618,089 \34,889 163,35\ 145,109 51,789 122,952
Production
Base 1,\24,187 245,337 297,105 263,926 94,\94 223.626
M.. Day 476,356 62,027 \7,480 223,403 50,220 \23,227
Trans. & Dis!.
Di5l.<8"
Base 169,088 76,476 92,6\2
Max Day 111,223 86,770 24,453
Trans.8"to24"
Base 353,359 159.818 193,540
M.. Day 232,433 181,33\ 51,101
Trans. > 24"
Base \95,224 42,605 5\,595 45.833 16.358 38,834
Max Day 128,4\5 \6,721 4.7t2 60.224 13.538 33.219
Meters 100,000 68,\95 27.309 2,489 555 1,453
Hydrants
Wacehouse 58,277 12,718 15,402 13,682 4,883 11.593
Billing & Colle<:ting 286,211 239,488 46,553 28 57 85
Debt Service
Supply 325,925 71,128 86,137 76,517 27,309 64.834
Production
Base 567,939 \23,944 150,097 133,335 47.587 112,976
Max Day 373,579 48,644 13,709 \75,203 39,384 96,640
Dis!.<8"
Base 401,754 181,706 220.047
M..Day 264,266 206,166 58,100
Trans. 8"t024"
B,.. 103,309 46,725 56,584
M.. Day 67,955 53,015 \4.940
Trans. > 24"
Base \46,848 32,047 38,8\0 34,476 12,304 29,21 t
Max Day 96,594 12,578 3,545 45,301 10,183 24,988
Billing & Collection 1,752 \,466 285 0 0 \
Subtotal 6,202,781 2,103.793 1,627,466 1.219,526 368,359 883,636
Administration Fees 640,3\3 217,\75 \68,003 125.892 38.026 9\,2\8
Total Revenue Requirement 6,843,094 2.320,968 \.795,470 \,345,417 406,385 974,854
Page \ of2
Total Residential Commercial Campbell Soup Tenaska 111 LCWSD
Base 4.704,311 1,344,568 1.533,283 838.769 292,448 695.243
Max Day 1,750,820 667.251 188,039 504,131 113,325 278.073
Customer 387,962 309.148 74,147 2,518 611 1,538
6,843.094 2,320.968 1,795,470 1.345,417 406,385 974.854
Base Revenue OtTsets
Water Taps 20,000 5,716 6,519 3.566 1,243 2,956
Misc. Water & Sewer
Bulk Water Sales 10,000 2,858 3,259 1,783 622 1,478
Service Charges 35.000 10,004 11,408 6,240 2,176 5,173
Water and Sewer Charge OtTs (30,000) (8,574) (9,778) (5,349) (1,865) (4,434)
rnterest Earned 40,000 11,433 13.037 7,132 2,487 5,912
75,000 21,436 24,445 13.372 4,662 11,084
Customer Revenue OtTsets
Sanitation Billing Fee 37,193 29.637 7,108 241 59 147
Water and Sewer Returned Checks 3.450 2,749 659 22 5 14
Water and Sewer Copies 43 34 8 0 0 0
Contract Customer Billing
40,685 32,420 7.776 264 64 161
Florida Power & Lieht
Base 189,779 54,242 61.855 33,837 11,798 28,047
Extra 71,775 27,354 7.709 20,667 4,646 11,400
Customer 14,237 11,345 2,721 92 22 56
275,791 92.940 72,285 54,596 16,466 39.503
Total Residential Commmial Campbell Soup Tenaska 111 LCWSD
Base 4,439,532 1,268,890 1,446,983 791.559 275,988 656.111
Max Day 1,679.045 639.897 180,331 483,464 108,680 266,674
Customer 333,041 265,384 63.651 2,161 525 r,320
6,451,618 2,174,171 1,690,964 1,277,184 385,193 924.105
Contract Revenue OtTsets
Residential Commercial
MJC,WSC $ 25,787 $ 20,056
Campbell Soup (36,841) (28,653)
Tenaska 111 (11,760) (9,147)
Lamar County (143,881) (111.904)
Total Contract Revenue OtTsets (166,696) $ (129,648)
Total Residential Comme.-cial
Base 2.941,967 1.379,703 1,562,264
Max Day 890,477 695,780 194.698
Customer 329.035 265,384 63,651
4,161,479 2,340,867 1,820,612
Page20f2
TABLE C-4
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
PROPOSED WATER RATES
PROPOSED WATER RATES
RESIDEI'òTlAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential I" Meter or Greater
COMMERCIAL RATES
$7.00 for firs! 200
34.00 for first 1,000
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial I" to 2" Meter
Commercial 3" Meter
Commercial 4" Meter
Commercial 6" Meter
CommercialS" Meter or Greater
$8.50
34.00
120.00
2.000.00
3,000.00
4,000.00
for flfs! 200
for first 1,000
for flfSt 3,000
for flfs! 100,000
forflfSt 150,000
for first 200,000
CURRENT WATER RATES
RESIDEI'òTIAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential I" Meter or Greater
COMMERCIAL RATES
$5.9t for firs! 200
29.57 for first t.OOo
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial r" to 2" Meter
Commercial 3" Meter
Commercial 4" Meter
Commercial 6" Meter
CommercialS" Meter or Greater
56.99
29.57
106.91
1,600.00
2.375.00
3,150.00
for flfs! 200
for first 1,000
for first 3,000
for firs! 100,000
for first 150,000
for first 200,000
Page I of I
Volumetric Rate (Cubic Foot)
$2.45 perCCFaboveBaseVolume
$2.45 per CCF above Base Volume
Volumetric Rate (Cubic Foot)
$2.45 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.00 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.00 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.00 perCCFaboveBaseVolume
$2.00 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.00 per CCF above Base Volume
Volumetric Rate (Cubic Foot)
$2.15 per CCF above Base Volume
$2.15 per CCF above Base Volume
Volumetric Rate (Cubic Foot)
$2.15 per CCF above Base Volume
$\.70 per CCF above Base Volume
$\.70 perCCF above Base Volume
$\.70 per CCF above Base Volume
$\.70 per CCF above Base Volume
$1.70 perCCF above Base Volume
c",yom,"s
WATER ANI) WASTEWATER COST 0' SERVlC' ST1Jt)Y
FlOW.OOO TSS """"" COST A1.LOCATION
"~AI""", 000' OODA"œ"" "" TSSAllœ"'" NIDAI'œ"'" 0._. C~~.C
C~,
".", "'" "~,, "'" ,.", U", ,.,,' "" '" '.00%
"'" 'U" I.'" "'" "" U", 'OS "" " '00%
,.'" ".," '.1" ""'ó "" u,,~ ,.. I."~ " '.00%
'.'00 "'" ",.. "",. ,-'" U.,,~ "" "" " '00%
I.'" "'" '" """. .00 U.,,~ '" I."~ " '00%
""" "'" U.,,~ "'~ "'"
"" ".," '" "'" 100 u,,~ ..,,~ , '00%
"'" "'" u,,~ "'~ '00%
""" "'" U"., .."" '.00%
".3'" ,",,"' '.'"
,., "'" '" "'" '" u,,~ " "'" , "'"
100 """ " ",,~ " u,,~ " ",.. , '00%
'" "'" .. ""~ '" ""~ " "" , '00%
'00 "'" "9 "'" " U.,,' '" "" , '00%
" "'" " "", " "'" " '" , '.00%
'" ".," " """. 32 "'" " ,.," , '.00%
" """ U "'" , u.,,' " .'" , '.00%
"'" ""., u,,~ I.'" '.00%
"'" "'" U", I.'" "'"
I.'" "'" ... "'" '" u", '" "" " "'"
"" "'" SO, "'" ". u", '" "" " "'"
'" """ .. "'" " u", " ..", , "'"
m "'" '" "'" .. u", " "" , "'"
,so "'" '" "'" .. u.,,' " ,."" 3 '00%
'" ,W" .. "'" " u", " "'" , '00%
"'" "",. u", "" "'"
"'" "'" U", I.'" '.00%
3.00' ..",
,SO "'" '" "'" .. u", "" 3 '.00%
"",. ""., U".. "" "'"
""" """. u", "" "'"
" "'" " ".",. " u,,~ " '" , '.00%
'" "'" .. "."", " "'" " "" , "'"
200 "'" '" "", " "'" '" "" , '.00%
'.'00 """ ,.m ".".. .., u", '" "" " '.00%
,U" "'" u.,,~ "" '.00%
"'" "'" U"., I.'" '.00%
',m
100 ,w" " ",,~ " u", "" I "'"
""" ""~ u,,~ "" '00%
"'" "",. "'" "" "'"
'.'00 "'" I,m "'" ... u,,~ ..", " ,.""
"'" "'" u"., "" "'"
""" "'" u", ,."" ,.""
"'" "'" u", "" "'"
"'"
"'.'" '.00% "'" "'" "'" 100"" ",.'"
..... '00% '.000'. '00% "'" 100"" "'"
U"" '.00% '000' "'" "'" 100.00% 1<173
23.100 "'" '.00% '.00% "'" 100."" ",100
I.'" "'" '00% "'" ,."" 100."" I.'"
,."" '00% '00% '.00% 100""
,."" "'" "'" "'" 100.""
,.", ,."" "'" '00% '.00% 100"" ,.",
'.00% '00% "'" "'" 100""
'00% '.00% '00% "'" 100.00%
",3"
".'" "'" '.00% "'" ,."" 100"" ".'00
".000 "'" '.00% "'" '.00% 100"" 2<000
.. "'" ,."" '00% "'" 100.00% "
1.'00 '00% '.00% '.00% '.00% 100.00% 1.'00
" '.00% '00% '00% "'" 100.00% "
'" '00% '.00% '00% "'" '00,"" '"
" '.00% '00% '00% "'" 100.00% "
" "'" '.00% '00% '00% 100"" "
"'" '00% '00% ,."" 10000%
"'" "'" '00% "'" 10000%
".m 39.m
"""""",,"'"
w...o...
""""""'"
",.,.nos.
"".....ri.
""......,..
Empl"" """..",,,.., I..
W.k.., c.m""",.. I..
"=..,.,w'C~.....,..
S..""",.,
SUBTOTAL
""""
o...S."".
=S"'.d
_V".I..O_""
_V"'d..o;l A '._.m'
,.... V"'d.. TO.
","""O_'s'"
-
c.mmu."'~.Td"'",
""",_.A"'"
T.."".",,-
""".."",,",.
""',....W_..«.
T"".S.T."'"
SUBTOTAL
~;;::.;.=...
SUBTOTAL
..........
,_"..AFlow,
M....,T'......"",,,
M_V"'d.
"""",.o.ohœ...,
SUBTOTAL
"""""""
A",".,
SUBTOTAL
"""""
"""..,.TooI."","",
_V".I.
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL WARENO",'
I
"""""--'"
S.orion...
""d ,".n.
TM".."'"
Em,-"""""",~,,,
Wœ"',C-""......
Uo=,..,...,c.m""....
"'~Im.
S""".",
""'..ACd",'n
SUBTOTAL
""""
O"'S."".
-,.
W",",_d
_V".'œ.O""'"
_V"'<I..Oi'A"""..,
_V".I..".
_V".,.."""
......,O_.S'"
M.O...d
SUBTOTAL
",.""
""""""
c.,.ml",,",.Td_,
c..",.......,
,__,....",
T,""'."",-
""'a."","';,
...,.;"...
",m"a,W"."'Oa
T"".,.T.I,".'"
C~.I~m
SUBTOTAl
~,~:~;'~'¿,'::::""
..". 0-
I.'" 0.-
2."0 0.-
2" 0.-
2."0 0.-
m 0-
"'0 0.-
100 0.-
".000 0-
".m
'.500 0.-
. 000".
. 0-
. 0-
. 0-
. 0.-
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 0-
. 0.-
. 0.-
. 0-
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 000%
. 0.-
. 000%
0.00%
000%
000%
000%
000%
000%
000%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00% 1.2"
100.00% I.'"
100.00% .",
100.00% 2"
100.00% ,",,0
'00.00% m
'00.00% '"
'00.00% 100
'0000% ".000
".m
100- 1.500
'0000%
10000%
'.500
100.00% 2.500
100- 200
100.00% 500
'00.00% 2.200
100.00% 2"
'00.00%
'00.00%
'0000% '.000
'00.00% '"
'00.00%
,.'"
'0000%
'00.00%
'00.00%
'0000%
100.00%
10000%
100-
10000%
10000%
10000%
""211
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 000%
. 000%
. 0.00".
000%
0.00%
000'.
"""""'"
M..,..,T~'."",.~,
"_.m '" ""0 M,.
_V"",.a
".~.Dmh._I",
M"._"A._.'
"""""""
~:~~,,'-
2.500 000%
200 000".
500 0.00%
7.'00 000%
2" 0.00%
. 000%
. 000%
"."0
'.000 0.00%
'" 0.00%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.-
. 0.-
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 0.00"
. 000%
0.00%
0.00%
000%
0.00".
0.00%
000%
0.00%
SUBTOTAL
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
0-
000%
0.00%
. 000%
000%
000%
0.00%
--
".-p
. 0.00"
. 000%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 0.00".
. 000%
0.00%
000%
0.00%
""""'"
'~loo,'T-a
"",_.,.TooI..Eq",.-
_V""'a
c.,.ml"'~S,.-
M',"m-
TOTAL BlLLlNO. COLUmON
"""""-""
"',""W....
""""',,",
TM"'_;~
'm,'"",,_'",I~'~'..
W.'o'.C'"'_'~I..
"'-".,..., c.""".,..
D,,"w,
Sm"',",
""'"
om"s,..'.
-"
,...
W_,_d
M_V"""a.O-'"
M.. V"'.la.OII' "'bri,m'
_V"'.la."a
_V"'.la."'.la
um""a..._".
Cb_I,,'M"""""
-"".'"..'.
""""""
C_u."',.Td_,
"oom,,"""
C_C_.S",I"""",,-
T,..",."",-
"""a."""",,
'nI"'U,,-
M'."",_.
",,",I......
","".W_oa.
T,.._,.T."..
SUBTOTAL'
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 000%
""211
",m 10000%
".,,' 10000%
".", 10000"
".'" 10000%
2.'" '0000'.
2.000 '00.00%
"'.000 '0000"
2.'" '0000%
. '0000%
. '0000%
'" 10000%
200 10000%
"0 10000%
2.000 10000%
".000 '0000%
1.'00 '0000%
1.'00 '0000%
'" 100.00%
'.000 10000%
'.000 10000%
'00 10000%
10000%
".0"
'000 '0000%
'.000 '0000%
. 10000%
'" 10000%
2.'00 10000%
10000%
10000%
'" 10000".
I.'" '0000%
1.000 '0000%
. '0000%
10000%
"'00
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
000%
000%
. 0.-
. 0.00%
. 0-
0""
0.00%
000%
0.-
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
000%
000"
"'.m 0.00%
".,.. 000%
".", 000%
".'" 000%
"'00 0.00%
2.000 000%
".000 000%
2.'" 000%
. 000%
000%
000%
. 000%
. 0-
0.00%
. 0.00'.
. 000%
. 000'.
000%
000%
0""
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
000%
000%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
000'.
000%
000%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
'" 0.00%
200 000%
2" 0.00%
2.000 000%
".000 000%
1.500 000%
1.300 0.00%
000 0.00%
'.000 000%
',000 0.00%
'00 0.00%
. 000%
"."0
0.00%
0.-
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 0.-
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
000%
0.00%
0.00%
000%
0.00%
000%
0.00%
0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0-
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
2.000 000%
'.000 0.00%
. 000%
'" 0.00%
2.300 0.00%
. 000%
0.00%
'" 0.00%
'-'" 0.00%
1.000 000%
. 0.00%
000%
. 000%
0.00%
. 0-
. 0-
0.-
0-
0.00%
000%
000%
000%
000%
0.00%
0.00%
000%
0.00%
0.00%
000%
0.-
0.00%
000%
000%
000%
000%
0.00%
. 0.00%
. 000%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.-
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 0.00%
. 000%
".'"
"..""
M,"'m_,,""',n
""'p"""'"
...,..,-
S,w""'""",.
""........,....,-
..... u..
,,",,"M"".
SU1ITOTAL
~.::':':',;::;~~mo
M.hi,.,T,,"""..m'
1._no'.""",M""
"""'V~"'.
L_"""'Eq.'..n'
EI.'n" Do" ""M.,
Ti.......
"""'-"I.Iwo
l.d"noO~".,.
."'"",
M",," '0"'"
~
Sn'..,-
Mnh.. "",.... ,.
",""L..
S_MoO.
.......
M.h...,.T,"",""..n'
"""'V~,..
SUBTOT""
~
....",W."""",n_'"
TOTAL SlWER M'>NT'NANC'
Ww.~,.. T'n'M"
'""""'-Om
",.'dW...
"""S...-
TMRS "."'n
,,",""'_""""","
W.....C~""W'n",
Uow_noCom"".....
"'....,
S"hm_,.,
""'"
om",""".
""'"
'""
W...,-"
"""'v~"'..o...,..
",,",V",,',.O"""'.n'
M_V~"'.",.
M_V~',.........
M'_App~..
"'_0""',,,.
Ch""""M"",".
M.On",'
-,......,.
""..."',.
Ph-"'.S."".
~
Com.u""n, ' T"_'
I.M_"""
c..n""",S.."""",'~
T.."""...~
"........
"""""""'-
""""""M
M""""-.
"'-i""'"
""""'.W..'O.
T".',.,T."'"
T""'"""""
SURTorAL.
100 '0000% 100 000% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
".000 10000% ".000 000% 000% 0.00% 000%
"... 100.00% ,... 000% 0.00% 0.00% 000%
,... 100.00% '.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
,... 10000% ,... 0.00% 000% 000% 0."'"
... '00.00% ... '00% ,~. '00% '.00%
'00.00% '00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0.00%
..."" ""00
000 10000% 100 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0.00%
".'00 100"'" ".'00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0"'"
'." ,OO~. "000 0.00% 000% 0.00% 000%
".. '00.00% ".000 """ o.~. 0.00% 0.00%
"... '00.00% ".000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
'00 10000% '00 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0"'"
'" 10000% '" 0.00% o~. 000% 0.00%
'00.00% 000% 0.00% O.~, 000%
,,-'00
..000 '0000% I." 0.00% 000% 000% 000%
,... '00.00% 2." 0.00% 0"". 0."'" 0.00%
2." 000.00% ,... 000% 000% 0.00% 0.00%
'0000% 0.00% ,~. '00% 0"'"
"... '0000% "... 0.00% ,."". '00% 0.00%
".000 100.00% "." 0.00% '00% 0."'" 000%
100.00% 0"'" 0"'" 000% 000%
10000% 0.00% '00% 0.00% 000%
10000% 0.00% 000% 0"'" 0.00%
".'00 100.00% ""'" 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 000%
'00.00% 0.00% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
10000% 0.00% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
'00.00% 0.00% 000% 000% 0.00%
"'00 ".'00
'0000% 000% o.~. '.00% 000%
'0000% 000% 0.00% '.00% 0.00%
00000% 0.00% '00% o~. 0.00%
",.'" """ ",.,,' "..... ",.,,' "'" ",."" """ ".'" """
".m """ ".'" "..... ".," """ ".," """ I.'" 000%
""" """ ".m ".,," ".", """ ".'" "'" ,.," '.00%
",... """ ".'" """ 'W. ".,," ".'" "'" ,.," 0.00%
".m """ ,.,,' """ '."0 ""'" ,.," "'" '" 0"'"
,... """ "0 ".,," '.'" ""'" '" "'" " 0.00%
"... """ '.m """ ,.", ""'" "" ,.,ow. '" 0"'"
,.," """ ,.m ".,," '.'" """ I.'" ,.,'" '" 0"'"
""" """ """ "'" 000%
,,"" """ """ "'" 000%
","" '00.'" "'.,,'
'.'00 """ '.0" ...... '.m """ ..,.. "'" 0" 000%
,.'" "."" '" ...... '" """ '" "'" " """
". "."" 0" ...... '" """ D' "'" " 0.00%
.,00 """ ,.m ".... ,.,,' """ '.m "'" m 000%
"." """ '.'" ....... '.'" ""'" ,.", "'" m 0"'"
'00 """ '" ....... '"~ """ '" "'" " 0.00%
"'00 """ '" ".,," '" """ ... "'" " 0"'"
,.. """ " ".,'" ", "'" " "'" , 0"'"
'." """ ..... ".,'" ,.m ""'" 2.'" ,.,'" ,.. '00%
'."0 """ ,.. "."" I.'" "'" ... '.1'" " 000%
".000 """ ".", ...... ".", """ "".. "'" ,.," 000%
,... "."" "0 ..,'" ... "'" '" "'" " 0."'"
"0 """ '" ".... '" """ ,~ ,.,'" " 000%
"0 """ '" ...... '" """ ,~ "'" " 0"'"
'" """ lIS ...... m """ "0 "'" " 0"'"
""" ...... """ '.1'" 0.00%
""" ".,," """ "'" 000%
"'.,.. '2.1"
>.000 """ '" ".,'" '.'" """ '" ,.,'" " 000%
'."" """ ,.". ".... .", """ ,.," "'" '" 0."'"
"."" ".... ""'" "'" 0."'"
,... """ "0 ...... ... """ '" ,.,'" " 000%
'00 """ '" ...... '" ""'" D' "'" " 0.00%
m." """ ".m """ """ ,,"" ".m "'" ,.'" 0.""
'" """ " ...... '" ".,," " '.'.'. , 0."'"
,... """ 7.'" ...... ",m """ '.'" ,.,'" '" 000%
J." ""'" "0 ....... I.'" """, '" "'" " 0""
'."" "'."" >T' ".,'" I.m ""'" 702 "'" " 000%
""" """ ,.,,' ".11" '.m ",,% I.'" "'" '" 0.00%
"000 """ '.'" .."" '.'" ",,% J.'" "'" '" 0.00%
""" "."" """ '.1'" 000%
""" ".,'" """ "'" 000%
".", "'.'" 7,œ'
"ph"
~t:~;;o~:'n
"",.AC,I-
FI".""AV"..
S"~.lbA""""
S"~A""n_.
""""'........."."
".., A "-....
..... u..
H"'~.AV,,-
""'..SI",o"'~"
",_.,.LM4fi"F~
JI.OOO "... "01 49.61% ".201 ""'4 1.441 21~' '" 0.00%
m """ " ..."" '" 2"", .. 2.1'" S 000%
",., """ I.'" .."" S."" "'.. 2.M' "'" '" 0.00%
.., """ "s ..."" '" """ D' 2'"" II 0.00%
0.0" """ I.'" ..."" '.m ",m U" "'" '" 0.00%
"0 "."" " ..."" '" ",.. .. ,."". S 000%
210 """ " """ '" 2"", .. 21'" S 000%
1.210 """ 2" 49."" 621 "'.. '" U.' 26 0.00%
11000 """ ,.'" 49."" ,.", 2"" .'" 2.1.' ". 0.00%
".000 """ 2.S" 49.'" S."2 2",' "'" 21'" 2S2 0.00%
,.soo """ I.'" ".'1% ,.m 21'" '-'IS U"" '" 0.00%
""" ...., 212S' 2.'.. 000%
20"" ...." 2"", 21"" 000%
'.000 """ 020 ....." '" 2"" S" "., 02 000'4
'o.soo 20"" 1M" ....." 21.'" 21"" D.'" 21.. 1.001 000'4
moo 20."" .,n ....." ".1" 2"", .,SO U.' .., 0.00'4
"00 20"'4 I.'" ...,'" W. "", I.no '.'.4 '" 000%
SOO """ '" ..,'" ,SO "", D' ".. II 000%
'.'00 20."" OS, ....., I.OS' 212S' '~ U"" " 0.00%
12.000 20"" ".IIS ..."" ".no 212S' "... U.' I.'" 0.00%
1.100 20"" '" ..,'" 70S 2"" '" 2.1.' " 000%
'00 20."" "S ...S'" '" 212S' '" U.' D 000%
100 "... " "'1% " "'S% 21 '.10'. , 0.00%
""" ....., "',., '.1.. 0.00%
"... ..,'" 212S' ".. 000%
".",
'.soo """ I.'" ,"'" '.m "", "" 2.10', '" 000%
"... ...,'" "'S% 2.1"" 000%
"."'. ..,'" 212S' ".. 0.00%
'.m "IS
".000 "... ..." ..,'" II.'" """ "SS 2'"" '" 000%
..... ".... I.'" ....., ,.", 2",,' I.'" 2.'"" '" 0.00%
'.000 ".... I.'" ...., ,.'" 2",' W' '.1"" '" 0.00%
".... ..,'" "'S% U'" 000%
,".000 """ ,.," ....., ".on 2S2S' 21'" ... 0.00%
""'4 "'1% 212S' """ 000%
,...., 21.'"
"'.'" m.II' "'.'" """
",.", 100.00" ",.", 0.00% MOO'. 0.""". 0.00%
,.'" 100.0000 ,.'" 000% 0.00'4 0.00% 0.00%
II.'" '00.00'4 II.'" 000% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
"'00 100.00% "'00 000% 0.00% 000'4 0.00%
I.SSS 100.00% ,.m 000% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
'.000 100.00% 1.000 000% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
".000 10000'4 ".000 0.00% 000% 0.00% 000%
1.'00 100""". ,",00 0.00% 000% 0.00'4 000%
100.00% 000% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
'0000% 0.00% 0.00% 000%
IS'.'"
'" 100""". '00 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0.00%
ISO 10000% ISO 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0.00%
" 100.00% " 000% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
1.'00 10000% 1.'00 0.00% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
'.000 10000% '.000 000% 0.00% 000'4 000%
'" 10000% '" 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0.00%
000 10000% 000 000% 0.00% 000% 000%
ISO 10000% ISO 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0.00%
210 100.00% 210 000% 0.00% 0.00% 000%
'00 10000% '00 0.00% 0.00% 000% 000%
IS.'SO 10000% IS."O 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0.00%
100 10000% 100 0.00% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
'00 10000% 100 0.00% 000% 000% 000%
100 10000% 100 0.00% 0.00% 000% 000%
100 100.00% 100 000% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
'00.00% 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0.00%
'00.00' 0.00% 000% 0.00'4 0.00%
'.2" 10000% ,.", 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
10000% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 000%
,.soo 10000% ,.soo 000% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
SOO 10000% soo 000% 0.00% 0.00% 000%
soo 100.00% SOO 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0.00%
10.000 100.00% 10,000 000% 0.00% 0.00% 000%
ISO 10000% ISO 0.00% 000% 000% 0.00%
I.SOO 10000% I.SOO 0.00% 000% 000% 0.00%
'00 100.00% '00 000% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
"'" 100.00% I.SOO 000% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
'SO 100.00% "0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
'00 10000% '00 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 000% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
10000% 0.00% 000% 000% 0.00%
96,2SO
~:::,::~~O~:;~=D'
".'."'~.""pmD'
I,_DO '0. "'. ",I",
"""""kl.
"'.dl~_,."""
'~o""ol.".lpmD'
.......,.......
EI._Io "'" ,.~I"
",'"'n~"^,,~D'
TO._,
~
"",,,
.......
""'.""".","nl
._moA_~
","",V"'<I.
Cpm.dl..,.. S,.=
M"p
'",'W~o."""n'_.'
"""""""
"""nOW...
Sod.._.
'""Um,'"
Em,_"""""""~",,
W«"",C~.........,
U"~p"'m' Com........
00-'..
So,;"""
""""
om.. So,,".
::;,.
w~,.,_.
""",V~"'n.e......
"""'V~"'m.O"""';~'
""",V"""m.TO"
""",V~"'m"",.I.
"--,,.
"_a_I,,,.
a.~InI""""m
""'~k,I
"'.'o.S"",'m
"".S.,,"n
_...ks.ppJlm
.....-
Commuk""",,_,
c.",.......
'.Md'" ......
"""-~
".kod~,
"mlln.EI""',;"
F"""',.-
",.dl~-
"-,....,
W""m.W...e.
,....,.T."...
'~""'.'"
......rs
"."a..~."i.i.n
""".p""""'"
'"...,c......
fil~"'OV..-
.....,..,.,...
-......
"'~U,.,..,...
"..., ".. ....
.,.,....>v..-
SO_-,. uod'" F-
lo.cOO 100.00% .... 000% 0.00% 0.00% 000%
'" 100.00% '00 0"'" 0.00% 000% 0.00%
'" '00.00% '00 000% 0.00% 000% 000%
,.. 10000% '00 0"'" 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
'00 10000% '" 000% 0.00% 000% 0"'"
'00 100.00% '" 000% 0.00% """ 0"'"
'00 100.00% '" 0"'" 0.00% '00% 0.00%
,... 10000% ,,"00 0."'" 0.00% 000% 0."'"
'." 10000% ,... 000% 0."'" 0"'" 000%
10000% 0.00% 0"'" 000% 0.00%
'00.00% 0.00% 0."'" 000% 000%
"0 100"'" '" 0.00% 000% 0"'" 0"'"
9.000 10000% ,... 0."'" 000% 0.... O-
J." 100."'" ,... 0"'" 0.00% 0"'" 0."',
2." 100"'" 2." 0."'" 0 OW. 0.00% 0"'"
'50 100"'" no 0."'" 0.00% 0"'" 0.00%
".'00 100."'" ".'" 0"'" 000% 0.00% 0.00%
'50 '0000% "0 0."'" 0.00% 0"'"
" '0000% " 0.... 0.00% 000% 000%
'00"'" 0."'" """ 000% 000%
100"'" 0.00% 0000. 0"'" 0"'"
32.'"
,.~ '0000% ,~ 000% 0."'" 'ow. 0."'"
10000% 000% 0"'" """ 0."'"
10000% 0.000. 0.00% 'ow. 0.00%
.~ 100.00% '.~ 0.00% 000% 000% 0."'"
10000% 000% 000% 000% 0.00%
10000% 0.00% 0."'" 0.00% '.00%
,.~ 10000% ,.~ 000% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
100"'" 000% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
~:i:~'F¡:;~_m'
".a..,Too. ""i",a'
_~ma."'."'_M,""
_V".I.
"""""".".¡",a'
"""n"""
"=ooi. Do. h__'"
"...,..
SUBTOTAl..
""""""'"
A."""
""-
,,_V".,-
.._a.'A_"u
c...moo""",S,,,-
"""'p
Swo4pi",.........
SUBTOTAl.
TOTAl. U""TATOON
O........~
0"" Ca",..."'"., 0.....
........
M."'fI-
"""""""""'"
"."'Adm",..",..
T...O....Ca",.,.."""""".
I.",.m ".'0% '.""'" ".,.. m.m """ "'.'" II.'" 0"" J.'"
""'" 10000% ""'" 000% 0.00% 0.00% 000%
m.", 10000% m.", 0."'" 0"'" 000% 0.00%
I."'~" ....." ...."
11.'00 '00"'" II.'" 000% 000% 0.00% 0"'"
'0000% 0.00% 0.00% 000% 000%
".", 000% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% '00"'" ".1"
".~ '0000% ".~ 000% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
".~ '0000% ".~ 000% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
"O.~' 10000% (,.~) 000% 000% 0.... 0.00%
'"'" 000% 0"'" 0"'" 0."'" 10000% '.'"
" 000% 0."'" 0."'" 0.00% 100.00% "
".~ 100.00% ".~ 0.00% 0.00% 000% 0.00%
10000% 0"'" 0.00% 000% 000%
"'.'00 ".'"
",.," "... ".,oo .."" ",.," ,1.33" ""0 210% ".. 000%
nom 10000% "'.m 0"'" 0.00% 000% 0.00%
II.m "... ,.m ,..", '.1" """ '.m >.10% ,OJ 000%
,WO 000% 000% 000% '.00% 100.00% 13.2"
"..... "'.UT 110.'" "-'"
.""" ."'.... I.""'" "'.'" ...'" ""0"
TOTAl..EaTS"',C,
"",F__a"F'
Adm.,..",..F-
....T'n
Mi.. W"""dS~.
Smi.;oo~",",F~
_.aw..
.... """.'S F-
W".mdS~.Cb...O'"
W".""".""odCb."
W"""dS_C"i.
"'.~E_od
Cooo., C_. ~""
SUBTOTAl..
T.""""""'~'
T..............I,,_"
....'",
TABLE C-6
CITY OF PARIS
WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY
PROPOSED WASTEWATER RATES
EXCESS CHARGE
BOD Revenue Requirement
BODtbs.
BOD Rate
$ 1,058,362
1,628,146
0.65 Per lb. above 250 mWl
580,098
1.727.729
0.34 Per lb. above 250 mWl
44,736
94,728
0.47 Per lb. above 30 mWl
TSS Revenue Requirement
TSStbs.
TSS Rate
NH3 Revenue Requirement
NH31bs.
NH3 Rate
PROPOSED WASTEWATER RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Volumetric Rate (Cubic Foot)
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential I" Meter or Greater
$7.50 for first 200
36.00 for first 1,000
$3.25 per CCF above Base Volume
$3.25 per CCF above Base Volume
COMMERCIAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Volumetric Rate (Cubic Foot)
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial I" to 2" Meter
Commercial Larger than 2" Meter
$10.50 forfirst200
36.00 for first 1,000
62.00 for first 2,000
$3.40 per CCF above Base Volume
$3.40 per CCF above Base Volume
$3.40 per CCF above Base Volume
CURRENT WASTEWATER RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Volumetric Rate (Cubic Foot)
Residential 3/4" Meter or Less
Residential I" Meter or Greater
$6.31 forfirst200
34.89 for first 1,000
$3.10 perCCFaboveBaseVolume
$3.10 perCCFaboveBaseVolume
COMMERCIAL RATES
Base Charge (Cubic Foot)
Volumetric Rate (Cubic Foot)
Commercial 3/4" Meter or Less
Commercial I" to 2" Meter
Commercial Larger than 2" Meter
$9.39 for first 200
29.07 for first 1,000
54.74 forfirst2,ooO
$3.27 per CCF above Base Volume
$3.27 per CCF above Base Volume
$3.27 per CCF above Base Volume
Page lofl