My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/02/2013 MINUTES
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
BUILDING AND STANDARDS COMMISSION
>
1979-2016
>
2013
>
04/02/2013 MINUTES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2017 3:04:02 PM
Creation date
2/16/2017 3:04:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to the neighborhood with building these structures. <br />Hayden Swaim, 3645 Reno Drive, spoke in favor of the petition. Mr. Swaim stated <br />he is the contractor for Mr. Ron Mayes. Mr. Swaim further stated he has built <br />several of these structures before and they are extremely nice homes. <br />B. Seven individuals spoke in opposition. <br />Jean Ferguson, 544 20th Street S.E., spoke in opposition to the petition. Mrs. <br />Ferguson stated she had a concern that it would bring the market value down on <br />their neighborhood and there would be no yard left with the structure they want to <br />build. <br />Kerri Priest, 2020 Simpson Street, spoke in opposition to the petition. Mrs. Priest <br />stated she had concerns about there being no parking and this area has too much <br />traffic for people to park on the street. Mrs. Priest further stated that she felt the <br />same way as Mrs. Jean Ferguson that it would bring the market value down on their <br />neighborhood. <br />David Hobbs, 2021 Simpson Street, spoke in opposition of the petition. Mr. Hobbs <br />stated that the property is able to build on but Mr. Swaim and Mr. Mayes are trying <br />to configure the structure in the wrong way which would require a variance. Mr. <br />Hobbs further states that he is against the variance and has five reasons; it's not <br />desired in the neighborhood, it's not good for health and safety, hardship, scale of <br />the property and it would be granting special privileges. <br />David Darrow, 2108 Simpson Street, spoke in opposition of the petition. Mr. <br />Darrow stated he had concerns that market value in the neighborhood would drop <br />and parking might cause traffic issues. <br />Betty House, 545 20th Street S.E., spoke in opposition of the petition. Mrs. House <br />stated she had concerns that market value in the neighborhood would drop, parking <br />might cause traffic issues and the shade trees would be gone. <br />Jim and Phalia Blassingame, 1941 Clarksville Street, Shawn Napier read their <br />email into the record in opposition of the petition. Mr. and Mrs. Blassingame stated <br />they feel there is a valid reason for the minimum lot depth of at least 100 feet which <br />Zoning Ordinance 1710 requires. There is a wonderful duplex across the street that <br />has parking in the back, a beautiful yard and they never have to park in the street. If <br />a Two - Family Dwelling were to be built at 555 20' Street S.E., those benefits <br />would not exist and the living conditions would be cramped at best. <br />David Lederer, 554 20th Street S.E., spoke in opposition of the petition. Mr. Lederer <br />stated he had concerns that parking might cause traffic issues and there is just no <br />room for a two - family dwelling home. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.