My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-04-16-Minutes
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
PEDC
>
1993-2016
>
2003
>
2003-04-16-Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2006 4:35:37 PM
Creation date
2/21/2017 11:49:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
2003
Doc Type
Minutes
CITY CLERK - Date
4/16/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />President Guest called for consideration of and action on a resolution approving <br />and adopting Development Covenants for the Paris Business Park. <br /> <br />Mr. Vest explained that these covenants would govern the Industrial Park. City <br />Attorney Schenk has looked at them and has prepared a twelve page summary <br />of his suggested changes. Mr. Vest said these covenants call for a property <br />owners association. <br /> <br />Mr. Vest said that the City Attorney is leaning more towards a corporation entity <br />that would govern the Park. City Attorney Schenk said that the only reason that <br />he did that was under Article 1, Definition, it states that "the Association will <br />mean or refer to Paris Business Partners Property Owners Association, Inc.". <br />That is the reason he made reference to those issues of an incorporation entity. <br />Mr. Vest said he did not think it would make a whole lot of difference either <br />way they go. Mr. Vest said he has visited with the architect who has done this <br />for dozens of developments, and his recommendation is for an association. Mr. <br />Vest said it was the architect's recommendation to keep it as simple as possible. <br />He said that the second thing they should keep in mind is for the association or <br />the corporation to accomplish what they wanted to do. Mr. Vest felt they should <br />look through this covenant and decide what they wanted to do, but for his <br />money, all common areas are properly maintained and the development <br />standards are adhered to, and to remove PEDC as the perpetual caretaker once <br />a percentage of the park is sold. PEDC has a very minimum role in this <br />association and it will not be eliminated but it will have a lesser role. <br /> <br />Director Fendley wanted to know if there was an association, if he was a <br />member of that group and had a business in the park, would he assume some <br />liability as an individual, more so than he would if it was an incorporated entity? <br />City Attorney Schenk said he thought that was true, by law, they will assess <br />liability to someone or some entity. City Attorney Schenk said he was not <br />making a recommendation either way and a number of his comments do not <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.