Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l!S-1t:>-1l.l98 y,~ <br /> <br />"'~UM VW~Vt.:.Il;.\"'H .11\1("" ~~ ~-'~ ~"''''~ <br /> <br />", J <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Eight separate GPR transec1s were acquired across this portion of the site. <br />Figure 2 shows the location of these transects at the site. <br /> <br />~dC. or 'tuihU"C <br /> <br />. -'CODere-l.~ W.ll 1, I' Ifj.,h) <br /> <br />Concrete 'ad <br /> <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Cnn: <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />CPR Tr~~cb <br /> <br />'~nc.. Po,U <br /> <br />~ M,to. Pht. wI <br />""11 ripe and VeAl <br /> <br />. S\lrt_c~ JJeb..is <br /> <br />, <br />. . <br /> <br />"'JU h:cl <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />. t <br />, " <br /> <br />ht Sl...t U:. <br /> <br />'Fenct <br /> <br />Figure 2. GPR Transect: Locatlons. <br /> <br />All transects were performed on the grass surface as shown in Figure 2. <br />Typically, if a UST is present and detectable in a GPR transect, there will be a <br />characteristic signature or outline which is presellt for each UST that is located, <br />and, the signature(s) will be present in several of the transects which cross the <br />UST(s). <br /> <br />No UST related anomalies were detected in any of the GPR transects. <br />However. there was one area that may have exp'3rienced previous excavation. <br />There also appeared to be a large amount of subsurface clutter, possibly due to <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />WaueTech <br /> <br />TIN ,<; '''Ill 'A"::> <br /> <br />S04 928 2B26 <br /> <br />P!'lGE,03 <br />