My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Board Minutes
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2017
>
11 - NOVEMBER
>
11-13-2017
>
06 - Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2017 2:38:34 PM
Creation date
11/9/2017 2:17:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
06
AGENDA - Type
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Preservation Services recommends the retention and repair of original windows whenever <br />possible. We believe that the repair and weatherization of existing wooden windows is more <br />practical than most people realize, and that many windows are unfortunately replaced because of <br />a lack of awareness of techniques for evaluation, repair, and weatherization. Wooden windows <br />which are repaired and properly maintained will have greatly extended service lives while <br />contributing to the historic character of the building. Thus, an important element of a building's <br />significance will have been preserved for the future. <br />Chairman Dux went on to explain the Design Standards, for the.Paris Historic District <br />talk about the windows and types, of replacements,. Commissioner Dux asked for clarification as <br />to the type of windows being vinyl, or vinyl clad wooden windows Ms. Daniel was proposing. <br />Ms. Daniel confirmed that the application was,for vinyl clad wooden windows. Commissioner <br />Diet said he had driven by and noticed that some of the windows looked original, in which Ms. <br />Daniels stated 10 years ago the windows were bricked up, and that when the bricks were <br />removed all that was left was some rotten pieces offromes, and so they replaced all of the <br />windows 10 years ago. She told the commission the windows don't open and close, they weren Y <br />done well, they are not insulated, single pane glass, but they did what they could afford at the <br />time, and now they want make them better. <br />Commissioner Dux also had an article from the magazine "This Old House " with <br />information comparing window types with substitute materials, noting the defects of'vinyl <br />windows. He asked her ifshe would be willing to withdraw her application and review the <br />information and come back to the commission, He let her know most preservation commissions <br />wouldn ? allow vinyl of any type. Ms. Daniel stated that she had the vinyl windows approved on <br />the front of her building several years ago, and it was her understanding that this was allowed. <br />There was more discussion on windows panes requested by Als. Daniel, appropriate divided light <br />panes, scale, size and dimension of the windows and the windows on the buildings next door. Ms. <br />Daniel said she had talked to the HPO, and had been told that divided light panes that had <br />divider mullions sandwiched between two pieces qfglass would not be acceptable, so they were <br />going with single pane over single pane window cis pictured <br />Commissioner Dux said he understood that there may have been some confusion if in the <br />past vinyl clad windows had been approve. He also stated there are also some nuances about <br />aluminum windows in the standards being allowed if they are powder cooled Ms. Daniel said it <br />is incrediblyfirustrating us a business owner and someone that is trying to do something good to <br />her building, and there seemed to be some changes in the commission decision process, because <br />the first time they had to spend an extra $4000 to get vinyl clad windows instead of aluminum <br />windows, and now this time it is dif <br />ffierent standard, She also stated that she was told originally <br />that the rear of'the building didn ifiall under the purview of'the commission, but now recognizes <br />this has changed too. She also stated that she wouldn t have done any work without a COA had <br />she known the back of the building was in the purview, because she is a supporter of downtown <br />and tries very hard. Shefth as ifsome misunderstandings were being held against her. <br />Commissioner apologized to Ms. Daniel.lbr any misunderstandings and told her nothing was <br />being held against her Commissioner Hider asked if it would be reasonable to make an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.