Laserfiche WebLink
A discussion followed with Mr. Boothe and Mr. Sudduth strongly against tie - <br />down fees because they did not think tie -down regulations could be enforced. <br />Mrs. Campbell and Dr. Keller stated they were for the tie -down fees because <br />it would: 1) guarantee permanent assigned spaces for local pilots and 2) <br />enhance airport revenues. <br />Motion was made by Mr. Sudduth, seconded by Mr. Rex: The Board recommends <br />that tie -down fees not be imposed at this time. Motion passed 2 -1, with <br />Dr. Keller and Mr. Boothe abstaining because of personal interests, both with <br />aircraft subject to these fees. <br />Mr. Sudduth and Mr. Boothe stated they felt the intent and recommendations of <br />the Board are being ignored. They said the Board met in June with T.K. Haynes <br />and David Doty to discuss what the City wished the Board to do in their work. <br />They wondered what the Council wished them to do if they are not going to <br />consider the advice of the Airport Board. <br />OLD BUSINESS: <br />1. Ramp and Fuel Status: Mr. Collier reported the ramp and fueling system <br />is complete. <br />2. Budget Status: Mr. Collier reported he has not seen a copy of the <br />adopted budget. <br />NEW BUSINESS: <br />1. New Permits: No permits to review. <br />2. Options on moving Operations Office from current location: It is the opinion <br />of the Board that moving the Operations Office to a new location will result <br />in a considerable savings to the City. <br />3. Promotion of Airport to Public: This item will be postponed until the next <br />meeting. <br />Mr. Sudduth asked that the Board include on the Agenda for October the study <br />of the concept of forming an Airport Authority. <br />The Board wrote the Agenda for the next meeting. <br />Motion was made by Mr. Sudduth and seconded by Mr. Booth to adjourn. The <br />motion was passed 5 -0. <br />