|
enough q0hern, to build a memorial structure to highlight not only the children's wing, but also acknott'ledge
<br />thefbi-ii,iets(,initai-iuirr. Coca-Cola ivould look to the commission to help design the memorial and its content.
<br />Xo other person spoke for or against the demolition of the structure.
<br />Commissioner Dux commended Coca-Colaforhaving the insight and ivillingness to construct an inteilvetive
<br />marker to recognize the histoi3, of the site and the building. He asked if they knew who theYplanned on working
<br />with to develop the content on the plaques, Mr. Gent stated that the, contractor who will be ;vorking oil, the
<br />demolition will also be helping construct the monument. Commissioner Dux said theY might want to consult
<br />with Skij)pei'Sleely-, with the Lamar County Histork.wl Museum, located behind MeCoca-Cola property.
<br />Hearing no other comments, the public hearing was then closed;
<br />Commissioner Dux asked if the conunission had arty other question concerning the Certificate: of
<br />Appropriateness. Conunissioner Ennnite asked if the monuinent design would be coming back to the
<br />commission, and Mr. A, H' Clem said yes, they would be looking to the commission for content, Commissioner
<br />Ennnite made the motion that the demolition order be approved, seconded by Commissioner Mandiver, motion
<br />carried 4-0.
<br />Discussion on Certafieate o,I'Al)l)i-ol.)i-i(iteness,fer?-.15 SE I" Street, Lickety Split Wine Bar, Fence.,
<br />No applicant was present, so Commissioner Dux recommended the commission neither approve nor deny an.),,
<br />applications until (in applicant is present. A motion ivas made to table the application request /�y Commissioner
<br />Vandiver, seconded by Commissioner Emmil.e, motion carried.
<br />Commissioner lux stated that he did have some questions about 1heproject. Carla Easton, the City Engineer
<br />explained the city Tvas working with Ms. Beavers, and addressed the commissioner "s" questions noting some of
<br />them ware a that did not involve the citY. Coiyitni.v,yioiie),Dux aiidColiiiiii's,vt'onei,
<br />Vandiver hada question about the amended application, egress, and permissionfi-om the Fire Marshall./or
<br />safety. Als. Easton clarafled some ref the easement details, and explained how- it was worked out benveen the
<br />propert), owners. Shefhrther e.ylained ono, reason the'limcing came to the historic preservation commission
<br />for review was because of the waY the fences was attached to the buildings. Otherwise it would have been
<br />approved in house.
<br />Thecommission discussed setting some goals for public outreach and education aimed at property owners with
<br />historic, homes and buildings, within the historic! districts. Chairman Dux suggested instead of running into
<br />problems with people not knowing what can and cannot be done in the district, outreach of what the rules are
<br />and the reason for the rule might help. He noted there should be some positive outreach tocontractors,
<br />realtors', building owners too. He asked 4',Ihere were an ' y ideas jrom the commission. Ms. Easton talked about
<br />the Community Development department is under the same serutiyq as the commission and there '
<br />'Y is an ongoing
<br />outreach campaign going ng onto help to educate the public, She mentioned the City of Paris used Facebook as a
<br />tool to blast out the information. Size had also arranged a stakeholders meeting about the permitting process,
<br />hoping to have a good dialogue with them to see if'thev can come up i,vith ideas on wvhat could be improved on
<br />the Citj) standpoint.
<br />Commissioner Dux also talked about aproperty tour with information and Commissioner Enimile mentioned
<br />Presen,ation month in Mqv might be a good time to try to do a property tour and she would visit with the Main
<br />Street Advisoiy board about a partnership.
<br />Consent agenda
<br />It was determined that the structures are not eligible to he designated on the National Register of Historic
<br />Places, as a recorded Texas Historic Landmark, or as historic property (is designated b'Y the City Council ref the
<br />Ci(v Qf Paris. Commissioner Barbee made the motion to take no opposition to the recommendations from the
<br />Code inspectors on the properties 1000 NE 3"'Street & 603 6"' AT
<br />HPO ivus not present to give report but the
<br />following was presented in the agenda items with additional notes:
<br />
|