06 - Board & Commission Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

enough elf thein to build a nieniorial structure to highlight not only the childrens wing, but also acknowledge the former sanitarium. Coca-Cola would look to the commission to help design the memorial and its content. No other person spokefor or against the deniolition of the structure. Commissioner Du.i commended Coca-Cola.fiv having the insight and willingness to construct an interpretive marker to recognize the histonerf thesite and the building, He asked ifthe knew who the -king Y _y planned on ivot ivith to develop the content on the plaques. Mr, Clem stated that the contractor vvho will be working on the demolition will also be helping ., construct the monument, Commissioner Dux saidthe ' y might want to consult with Skipper,Steely, with the Lamar County Historical Musewn, located behind the Coca-Cola property. Hearing no other comments, the public hearing was then closed,, Commissioner Dux asked if the commission had any other question concerning the Certificate of Appropriateness. Commissioner Enzinite asked ?f monument design would be coining back to the commission, and Mr. A. TV. Clem saidyes, they would be looking to the commission for- content. Conniiissioner Emmite made the motion that the demolition order be approved, seconded bY Commissioner Vandiver, motion carried 4-0. DisCUSSiOn 077 Certificate ol'Appropriatenessfim- 15 SE I" Street, Licketv Split Wine Bar, Fence: No applicant was present, so Commissioner Dux recommended the commission neither approve nor deiq aray applications until an applicant is present. A motion was made to table thea aPplication request bY Commissioner Vandiver, seconded by Commissioner Einniite, motion carried Commissioner Dux stated that he did have some questions about the project. Ca) -la Easton, the City Engineer explained the city teas working with Ms. Beaverv, and addressed the connnissioner,s.� questions noting some of thein were a thaidid not involve the city. Coir��iini,"iotiei-Dux acrd COnt)ltiSSiOl7cr Vandiver had a question about the amended application, egress, and permission firom the Fire Alarshallftir saft,ty. lvls. Easton clarified some of the easetnent details, and explained how it was worked out between the property oivners. She fio-ther explained only reason thefincing came to the historic preservation commission for review was because of'the vvaY the./ence was attached to the buildings. Otherwise it would have been approved in house. .The commission discussed setting some goals for public outreach and education aimed at property owners with historic homes and buildings within the historic di.qricts. Chairman Dia: suggested instead ref running into problems with people not knowing vvhat can and cannot be done in the district, outreach oj'what the rules are and the reason for- the rule might help, He noted there should be some positive outreach tocow.ractors, reallors, building owners too. He asked iffhere ivere anjr ideasfi,om the commission. Ms. Easton talked about the Community Development departnru,,nt is under the same scrutiny as the commission and there is an ongoing outreach campaign going onto help to educate the public, She mentioned the City of'Paris used Facebook as a tool to Mist out the in1brination. She had also arranged a stakeholders tneeting about the permitting process, hoping to have o good dialogue ivith them to see Y'thejcan come ty�) with ideas on n,hat could be improved on the City standpoint. Commissioner Dux also talked about a properly tour with information and Coaunissioner Enunite mentioned Preservation month in Meq might be a goodlinle to try to do a properiv four and she ivould visit )vil.h the Alain Street Advisoij, board about a partnership. Consent agenda It was determined that the structures are not eligible to be designated on the National Register oflistoric Plac',es, as a recorded Texas Historic Landmark, or as historic property as designated by the City Council of the Cit.),, of Paris. Commissioner Barbee made the motion to take no opposition to the recommendationsftorn the Code inspectors on the propertics 1000 NE 3"'Street & 603 6"' NE. IIPO was not present to give report but the./bIlovving was presented in the agenda items with additional notes: