Rgurp n " gn r. u& 0pI /or doW«d'n i'PTIlm Ir':lariS, TeKi!!n,
<br />i ii�ii? I%vomay I teto a d oii o 115S t II e e is 11VI a II Iri St re a ra d La ii r IIS r Ave r� u e /C' " I a II�. IIks; ide Il 11 I e St a e t
<br />,4, BIIef fd.st Ryof Mine,,,."wr;y and 'IVO) -Wary"tti"idmets
<br />Since the founding of cities in the United States, starting in 1565 with St. Augustine, until about 50 years
<br />ago, all streets were two-way. Of course, for thousands of years before that, paths, trails, and streets in
<br />Native American villages and along their trading routes were also two-way. There were lots of good
<br />reasons for the two-way operations. The most obvious reasons are the convenience of being able to go
<br />either way along a street, direct routing, and shorter trips. Such traditional reasons weren't widely
<br />recognized, documented, assigned technical names, or even measured because that was just the way
<br />things were for thousands of years. The basic idea of two-way streets was never in question. However,
<br />4
<br />I
<br />6
<br />YN.fm.
<br />I
<br />d
<br />J
<br />y
<br />T
<br />I
<br />j
<br />o
<br />ie
<br />i;
<br />d
<br />Rgurp n " gn r. u& 0pI /or doW«d'n i'PTIlm Ir':lariS, TeKi!!n,
<br />i ii�ii? I%vomay I teto a d oii o 115S t II e e is 11VI a II Iri St re a ra d La ii r IIS r Ave r� u e /C' " I a II�. IIks; ide Il 11 I e St a e t
<br />,4, BIIef fd.st Ryof Mine,,,."wr;y and 'IVO) -Wary"tti"idmets
<br />Since the founding of cities in the United States, starting in 1565 with St. Augustine, until about 50 years
<br />ago, all streets were two-way. Of course, for thousands of years before that, paths, trails, and streets in
<br />Native American villages and along their trading routes were also two-way. There were lots of good
<br />reasons for the two-way operations. The most obvious reasons are the convenience of being able to go
<br />either way along a street, direct routing, and shorter trips. Such traditional reasons weren't widely
<br />recognized, documented, assigned technical names, or even measured because that was just the way
<br />things were for thousands of years. The basic idea of two-way streets was never in question. However,
<br />4
<br />I
<br />6
<br />YN.fm.
<br />1
<br />I
<br />j
<br />o
<br />c'
<br />, d
<br />J
<br />Id411ag'
<br />3�
<br />„�
<br />I
<br />/
<br />i
<br />�I
<br />Rgurp n " gn r. u& 0pI /or doW«d'n i'PTIlm Ir':lariS, TeKi!!n,
<br />i ii�ii? I%vomay I teto a d oii o 115S t II e e is 11VI a II Iri St re a ra d La ii r IIS r Ave r� u e /C' " I a II�. IIks; ide Il 11 I e St a e t
<br />,4, BIIef fd.st Ryof Mine,,,."wr;y and 'IVO) -Wary"tti"idmets
<br />Since the founding of cities in the United States, starting in 1565 with St. Augustine, until about 50 years
<br />ago, all streets were two-way. Of course, for thousands of years before that, paths, trails, and streets in
<br />Native American villages and along their trading routes were also two-way. There were lots of good
<br />reasons for the two-way operations. The most obvious reasons are the convenience of being able to go
<br />either way along a street, direct routing, and shorter trips. Such traditional reasons weren't widely
<br />recognized, documented, assigned technical names, or even measured because that was just the way
<br />things were for thousands of years. The basic idea of two-way streets was never in question. However,
<br />4
<br />
|