Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 14 <br />memorandum <br />TO: City Council <br />Gene Anderson, Interim City Manager <br />FROM: Bob Hundley, Chief of Police <br />SUBJECT: MOTEL ORDINANCE REQUEST <br />DATE: February 4, 2020 <br />BACKGROUND: In 2019, a citizen presented the council with a petition requesting adoption of <br />an ordinance that would help control criminal activities at local hotels and rental properties in the <br />city. An ordinance from the city of Grand Prairie was also presented as an example of what that <br />city and others had put into place for crime control. Council discussed this issue in two meetings <br />in the fall of last year. A supplemental report was delivered to Council in January of 2020. <br />STATUS OF ISSUE: At that time, the city council directed me to report back to Council in <br />February regarding the on-going issue. <br />In the attachments to this memo, I have included a summary of the calls for service to all motels <br />in the city along with individual reports regarding calls for service to each motel. Please be assured <br />that if a motel is turning a blind eye to issues of selling drugs, harboring criminal activity or <br />providing a base of operations, more attention from the police will be forth coming. I also would <br />be remiss if I did not point out that lower call volume is not unexpected during the winter months. <br />It is my opinion that an ordinance crafted on one such as the Grand Prairie model would not be of <br />benefit to reducing these calls for service in this case. This ordinance relies on inspections by <br />building officials regarding the physical plant of the motel along with different tiers of response <br />based on calls for service. It is my opinion that an ordinance regarding inspections on motels would <br />be placing an undue burden on motels which have a very low incidence of police calls which would <br />be most of the motels in Paris. <br />Should we decide to craft an ordinance requiring action for locations with heavier than `normal' <br />police calls for service, we would have to be very cautious as to what calls for service would be <br />counted. For example, should a person become ill, depending on how the call is received, a fire <br />call, an EMS call and a police call would be created for one incident. A traffic accident on the <br />parking lot should not be counted. A family checking on the welfare of someone in the motel <br />should not be counted. The report of calls for service can become subjective quickly if these type <br />calls are not identified initially in the ordinance. <br />