My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-034 - Atmos Energy Rate Adjustment - 2020 Rate Review
City-of-Paris
>
City Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
2011-2020
>
2020
>
2020-034 - Atmos Energy Rate Adjustment - 2020 Rate Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2020 12:27:02 PM
Creation date
9/15/2020 11:55:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2020. This should save ratepayers approximately $9 million such that the case is functionally <br />equivalent to ACSC's consultants' recommendation of $80.8 million. <br />The Executive Committee recommends a settlement at $90 million. The Effective Date for <br />new rates is December 1, 2020. ACSC members should take action approving the Resolution <br />before November 1, 2020. <br />PROOF OF REVENUES <br />Atmos generated proof that the rate tariffs attached to the Resolution will generate $90 <br />million in additional revenues from ACSC Cities. That proof is attached as Attachment 1 to this <br />Staff Report. ACSC consultants have agreed that Atmos' Proof of Revenues is accurate. <br />BILL IMPACT <br />The impact of the settlement on average residential rates is an increase of $5.15 on a <br />monthly basis, or 9.9 percent. The increase for average commercial usage will be $15.48 or 6.56 <br />percent. A bill impact comparison is attached as Attachment 2. <br />SUMMARY OF ACSC'S OBJECTION TO THE UTILITIES CODE SECTION 104.301 <br />GRIP PROCESS <br />ACSC strongly opposed the GRIP process because it constitutes piecemeal ratemaking by <br />ignoring declining expenses and increasing revenues while rewarding the Company for increasing <br />capital investment on an annual basis. The GRIP process does not allow any review of the <br />reasonableness of capital investment and does not allow cities to participate in the Railroad <br />Commission's review of annual GRIP filings or allow recovery of Cities' rate case expenses. The <br />Railroad Commission undertakes a mere administrative review of GRIP filings (instead of a full <br />hearing) and rate increases go into effect without any material adjustments. In ACSC's view, the <br />GRIP process unfairly raises customers' rates without any regulatory oversight. In contrast, the <br />RRM process has allowed for a more comprehensive rate review and annual evaluation of expenses <br />and revenues, as well as capital investment. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.