My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
22 - Disannextion Request - 660 adn 680 CR 32900 LCAD Parcels 50055 and 50056
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2021
>
05 - MAY
>
May 24
>
22 - Disannextion Request - 660 adn 680 CR 32900 LCAD Parcels 50055 and 50056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2021 12:10:55 PM
Creation date
5/20/2021 11:59:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART II: PURPOSE & INTENT <br />The City of Paris seeks to annex property within its extraterritorial JuNsd;coon for the fallowing <br />purposes: <br />To promote orderfyr growth by facilitating long-range planning for the provision of municipal <br />services and by applying appropriate land use regulations, development standards, property <br />maintenance standards, fire codes, construction codes, and emrlronmental regulations. <br />• To diversify the economic base and create job opportunities by annexing property for <br />commerdaI and industrial development. <br />To fulfill these purposes, the city has formulated this annexation policy in order to: <br />Provide the city council with more specific, objective, and prescriptive guidance for making <br />annexation decisions. <br />Enable the city to be more proactive in identifying areas for annexation by providing for a <br />regularly updated annexation program. <br />Provide for meaningful public participation in formulating the annexation program as part of the <br />regular update of the city's comprehensive pian. <br />Issues that should be considered include: <br />Pbvsicai Boundaries <br />Proposed annexations should acknowledge, so far as possible, existing or proposed physical <br />features which can constitute boundaries between different areas. For example, natural <br />features such as rivers, streams, or pronounced topographic changes, and man-made elements <br />like railroads and existing or planned expressways and freeways, can be appropriate boundaries <br />between the annexation areas of two or more communities. <br />Legal and Administrative Boundaries <br />Invisible boundaries are sometimes just as important as the strong visible barriers just <br />described, County lines are permanent political boundaries that can serve as appropriate <br />annexation limits. Though existing property lines, easements, corporate limits and the <br />administrative boundaries of park districts, fire protection districts, and elementary and high <br />school districts, can and do change, they should be respected as far as possible to avoid <br />confused jurisdictions and administrative problems. <br />Natural DI,bagg Divides <br />Because of the high Capital costs associated with sanitary sewer installations (as well as, of <br />course, other utility installations), municipalities should typically annex within natural drainage <br />basins to achieve the economies of gravity sewer flow. In areas, however, where, for example, a <br />countywide sewer system has been proposed, drainage divides are less important as a guideline <br />for annexation boundaries. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.