Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,M <br /> <br />MURPHY APPRAISALS 0 [E /1 . <br />o"a filal, C77pp'taLfiUfi <br />W.T. "Bill" MURPHY ASA. IFAS. MGA, SRA <br />and {!onfiu.[tanh <br /> <br />1310 N.MAIN PLACE-surTE D P 0 lOX'. <br />TELEPHONE 7....3394 <br />PARIS, TEXAS <br />75.10 <br /> <br />October 24, 1986 <br /> <br />Mr. John Buss, Director of Engineering <br />City of Pa ri s <br />Box 1037 <br />Paris, Texas 75460 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Buss: <br /> <br />I submit herewith my market value appraisal report of the damages caused by the taking <br />of a 2.51 subsurface utility easement at the improved site of 240 acres located B.5 <br />miles northeast of Paris, Texas. <br /> <br />The purpose of my appraisal is to estimate the damages to property as the result of <br />a taking by the City of Paris, Lamar County, Texas, in due process, and to provide a <br />basis for just compensation. <br /> <br />Definition of Market Value <br />Market value is the highest price which a property will bring if exposed for sale in <br />the open market for a reasonable time by a willing seller and sold to a willing buyer, <br />neither being under any compulsion to act, both the seller and buyer having full <br />knowledge of all the uses and purposes for which the property is being used and for <br />which it is capable of being used. <br /> <br />Definition of Just CQmQeDsation <br />The U.S. Supreme Court case of Olson vs. United States, 292 U.S. 246, is most often <br />cited as the authority on condemnation law, and defines just compensation as follows: <br /> <br />"Just compensation includes all elements of value that inhere in the property, <br />but it does not exceed market value fairly determined. The sum required to be <br />paid the owner does not depend upon the uses to which he has devoted his land, <br />but is to be arrived at upon just consideration of all the uses for which it <br />is suitable. The highest and most profitable use for which the property is <br />adaptable and needed or likely to be needed in the reasonably near future is to <br />be considered, not necessarily as the measure of value, but to the full extent <br />that the prospect of demand for such use affects the market value while the <br />property is privately held." <br /> <br />Definition of Highest and Best Use <br />Highest and best use is the most profitable likely use to which a property can be put. <br />The opinion of such use may be based on the highest and most profitable continuous use <br />to which the property is adapted and needed, or likely to be in demand for, in the <br />reasonably near future. However, elements affecting value which depend upon events or <br />a combination of occurrences, which - while within the realm of possibility _ are not <br />fairly shown to be reasonably probable, should be excluded from consideration. Also, <br />if the intended use is dependent on an uncertain act of another person, the intention <br />cannot be considered. <br /> <br />Highest and best use is also defined as that use of land which may reasonably be <br />expected to produce the greatest net return to land over a given period of time; that <br />legal use which will yield to land the highest present value, sometimes called its <br />optimum use. <br /> <br />In my opinion, the damages to the <br />Fair market value prior to the <br /> <br />240-acre subject property are as follows: <br /> <br />taking <br /> <br />$276,000 <br />