Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meeting <br />December 12, 2022 <br />Page 6 <br />Property Tax Code. Mr. Pounders said Mr. Mack had identified some of these properties as <br />possibly being able to be used in the 5 In 5 Program. He also said if the Resolution before them <br />was approved, the City would withdraw prior approval for sale of these properties as the City <br />desired to re -purpose some of the Trustee properties as part of the 5 In 5 Program. <br />A Motion to approve this item was made by Council Member Pankaj and seconded by <br />Council Member Pilgrim. Motion carried, 5 ayes — 0 nays. <br />21. Discuss and act on a request from Tekmak Development for a variance from distance <br />restrictions under Article 5.03 Alcoholic Beverages Section 5.03.003. <br />Council Member Pankaj said he had a conflict and needed to be recused on this item. A <br />Motion to recuse Council Member Pankaj was made by Council Member Pilgrim and seconded <br />by Council Member Moore. Motion carried, 5 ayes — 0 nays. <br />Mr. Mack explained Thomas Kirkland, President of Tekmak Development Company, <br />requested,a variance to City Code Section 5.03.00.3 pertaining to the restrictions for -proximity of <br />establishments selling alcoholic beverages to the site of the new Marriot Hotel in order, to receive <br />a TABC license, Mr. Mack said that North Lamar ISD High School property line was slightly <br />less than the 300' requirement but if you measure from the high school building to the hotel <br />building, the distance was far greater than 300'. Mr. Mack also said the area within the hotel <br />devoted to alcohol service was very small and would serve to provide on-site service to the hotel <br />and community patrons utilizing the event center space. He reported that the notice was sent to <br />North Lamar ISD well in advance to the City Council meeting but as of this date, there had been <br />no response. Mr Mack said staff recommended. approval of the variance. <br />A Motion to approve this item was made by Council Member Pilgrim and seconded by <br />Council Member Moore. Motion carried, 4 ayes — 0 nays. <br />A Motion to return Council Member Pankaj to the meeting was made by Council <br />Member Pilgrim and seconded by Council Member Moore. Motion carried, 4 ayes — 0 nays. <br />22. Discuss and act on RESOLUTION NO. 2022-071: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY <br />COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS, APPROVING ADDENDUM NUMBER <br />THREE TO THE SEWER SERVICE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARIS <br />AND THE CITY OF TOCO DATED DECEMBER 8, 1969 AND AUTHORIZING THE <br />MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAME; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS <br />RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br />City Manager Grayson Path gave a brief history of this item beginning with December 8, <br />1969, when the City of Paris entered into an agreement with W.E. Thompson on behalf of the <br />Toco Water Supply Corporation for wastewater services. He said the agreement included that <br />Toco would construct and own all sewer lines within their jurisdiction and also construct the <br />necessary transmission infrastructure to feed wastewater to Paris for treatment. As part of that <br />agreement, Paris would own and maintain the transmission infrastructure outside of Toco. Mr. <br />Path said Paris was working through the Lamar County Water Supply District for them to bill <br />