Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 <br />Chad Lindsey made a motion to approve this item. Further discussion from the Commission <br />regarding duplexes. City Attorney- Stephanie Harris advised the Commission that the only <br />item before them is the plat and if it meets the plat requirements they are required to approve <br />the plat. Harris further states if there are questions about future zoning it should be placed on <br />a future agenda. Further discussion by commission with question if they can table the item. <br />Harris explained the plat shot clock. Developer Randy Hider, 120 E Long, asked to speak to <br />the Commission. The Chairman granted permission. Hider explained that he is following the <br />proper design standards and the zoning ordinance. Hider further states that the Commissions <br />only responsibility here is to approve or deny the plat based on the City of Paris requirements. <br />Hider states that there was initial pushback from the Historic Preservation Commission and <br />the item was tabled but they found that he is following all of the requirements, therefore, made <br />the appropriate decision to approve it. Hider asked the Commission if they have seen the <br />proposed project and they had not. Fendley states there is a motion on the floor by Chad <br />Lindsey to approve the item and asked if there is a second. Francine Neeley made a motion to <br />approve. Spain asked if the item could be tabled. Todd explained the shot clock requirements <br />for plats and if a decision is not made timely it would automatically be approved. Further <br />discussion from the Commission. Motion failed due to opposition from Clifton Fendley, Adam <br />Bolton, Chance Abbott and Robert Spain. Inaudible discussion from audience. Chance Abbott <br />made a motion to deny this item and was seconded by Robert Spain. Motion was 5-1 with <br />Chad Lindsey opposed and Francine Neeley abstained. <br />The City Attorney Stephanie Harris advised the Commission in this denial that they are <br />required by law to provide a reason for denial tied back to the ordinance. It would be helpful <br />to staff if you can articulate the reason for denial so they can provide the reason to the property <br />owner. Chairman Clifton Fendley states a member from the Historic Preservation Commission <br />is present if they want to allow her to speak. Fendley recognizes the member of the Historic <br />Commission. Jessica Holtman, 722 S Church Street states that she is a resident of S Church <br />since 2018 and also on HPC. Holtman states technically the vote coming forward from HPC <br />was an approval but it wasn't at first. Holtman further states that she was the only member that <br />stood up and said she would deny it and she has her own reasons for doing that. Mostly because <br />she is an owner of a historic property on Church Street and has invested her money to live there <br />and raise her kids there. Holtman states that she does not understand how a duplex meets the <br />purpose and intent of the design standard specifically as it pertains to Church Street Proper. <br />Holtman states that they had to do what the City Attorney said they needed to do and that's <br />what got done. Holtman further states that several on the Commission felt they didn't have a <br />choice in the matter. Holtman states that a duplex does not follow the continuity of the street <br />and this has been a very hot topic. She is trying to figure out the legality of denying the design <br />standard, denying the plat. Holtman states she just wanted to provide insight for the planning <br />commission from the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission. <br />The will of the Commission is to reconsider the motion for item 11. A motion to reconsider <br />was made by Clifton Fendley and seconded by Adam Bolton. <br />A Motion to approve the preliminary plat was made by Board Member Clifton Fendley and <br />seconded by Board Member Francine Neeley. Motion carried, 6 ayes — 0 nays. <br />