Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />is" <br />�ffIff r ECroW>uAM CAVEA <br />Discuss and Consider Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting held October 17, 2023 <br />Chairman Bray presented the October 17, 2023, meeting minutes for review and discussion. <br />Mr. Roddy made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Mr. Terrell seconded the motion. <br />Vote: 5 -ayes to 0 -nays <br />Discuss and Consider Approval of the September and October 2023 Financial Statements <br />Secretary and Treasurer Chase Coleman presented financial reports ending September 30, 2023, and <br />October 31, 2023. Mr. Coleman provided a brief report on year-end encompassing the last twelve <br />months, stating that total sales tax revenue received were $2,471,827 and total expenses reported were <br />$1,801,747, which left a net income of $607,080. During the discussion, Mr. Coleman noted that <br />October was another strong month for sales tax totaling $200,712. <br />After a brief discussion among members of the board, the discussion concluded. <br />Mr. Homer moved to approve the September and October 2023 financial reports. Mr. Roddy seconded <br />the motion. <br />Vote: 5 -ayes to 0 -nays <br />Discuss and Consider Approval of the recommended bid of J & L Paving, LLC. for the NW Industrial <br />Park EDA Expansion Project as the low bidder presenting the best value to the project <br />Ms. Hammond provided a brief recap of the EDA project stating that in October, the PEDC went out to <br />bid for the addition of a deceleration lane on Loop 286 for the reconstruction and expansion of 34th <br />Street and the extension of J. Eagan to 34th Street at Northwest Industrial Park as part of the EDA grant <br />awarded in April earlier in the year. On November 16th, bids were publicly opened and in response, the <br />PEDC received two bids. The first bid was from J&L Paving at $1,151,367.69 and the second bid was from <br />Richard Drake Construction at $1,478,764.95. <br />Ms. Hammond explained that both bidders were vetted and deemed qualified bidders and noted that all <br />materials were provided in the board member packet for review including a recommendation from the <br />engineer of record for the EDA grant, Shawn Napier of EST. She stated that both bid submittals included <br />a detailed bid package, proof of coverage, bid sheet with tabulations, SAM.gov active registration, and <br />for the recommended bid, previous work experience and comparable work experience are included. Ms. <br />Hammond noted that there is an extensive process provided by the EDA that must be conducted with a <br />vast amount of documentation. <br />Ms. Hammond asked members of the board to reference EST's letter recommending awarding the <br />construction contract to J&L paving based on being the lowest qualified bidder. As a point of reference, <br />Ms. Hammond stated that when the PEDC submitted the EDA grant, the budget that was estimated by <br />the engineer of record was $1,485,000, noting that the low bidder came in considerably under budget. <br />Ms. Hammond stated that if the board accepts the recommendation, this recommendation still requires <br />the EDA to sign off, noting that the PEDC has submitted the recommendation to the EDA concurrently to <br />keep the process in motion. Ms. Hammond concluded her portion of the discussion by reiterating that <br />there is a lengthy checklist associated with the process and asked Mr. Napier of EST, the engineer of <br />record, to provide additional comments regarding the recommendation process. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />