My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/07/2025 Minutes
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2025
>
01/07/2025 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:56:34 PM
Creation date
3/18/2025 12:55:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment Meeting <br />January 7, 2025 <br />Page 2 <br />No one else spoke 'in favor or opposition of the request. <br />Public heating was declared closed. <br />Motion was made by Richard Thompson, seconded by Ben Vaughan to deny the variances <br />to the City of Paris Accessory Building Regulations based on the following findings. <br />Motion carried 5 ayes - 0 nays. <br />9 <br />FINDINGS. <br />1 The accessory structure setbacks cannot be met. <br />2. The lot is platted. <br />3. The request for variances is not in harmony with the general purposes and intent of area <br />regulations for accessory buildings in residential and apartment districts contained in the <br />Zoning Ordinance 1710 Subsection 13-101. (c) and will not protect the character of the <br />immediate vicinity of the area. <br />4. There are no special or unique condition(s) of restricted area, shape, topography, or <br />physical features that exist on the subject parcel of land that cause unusual and practical <br />difficulty or unnecessary hardship in compliance with the provisions sought here to be <br />varied. <br />5. The hardship +.r to be avoided is the result of (a) the applicant's own actions (self - <br />V <br />imposed or self-created), and no (b) economic or financial "hardship." <br />6. The provision of the ordinance regulation that are sought to be varied, does not deprive the <br />applicant of reasonable rights to use the property that are commonly enjoyed by other <br />r 'dential properties in the SF -2 Residential Zoning District which are required to comply <br />esi <br />with these same ordinance provisions. <br />Chairperson <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.