My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2026 Agenda Packet
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2026
>
02-09
>
02-09-2026 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2026 10:51:03 AM
Creation date
2/5/2026 10:49:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rose wanted to clarify that all city departments have capital plans, which was <br />something recently started by her. Capital Plans are something that the city <br />addresses and the council must be involved in because they are money related. <br />This is where the City Manager's role lies. Regarding other items, such as <br />endowments, the Library Board is involved in helpingwith that, but the City <br />Manager must take part in working with that. <br />Steve stated his concern was less about keeping the building running and more <br />about the services offered at the library now and in the future. If there's funding <br />required for those items, Steve asked how those get addressed to the council for <br />evaluation. Steve also reiterated that simply because the goals are listed on the <br />SP, that doesn't mean it's a commitment from the city or anyone else; it's just a <br />List of things the board would like to accomplish, and a strategic manner of how <br />the board discussed doing them. <br />After much discussion back and forth, Rose noted that Connie must take <br />direction from different places, and for the Library Board to be please patient <br />during the process. Steve summarized that his goal is not so much to create <br />conflicting priorities, but if there are discussions regarding the SP, to please bring <br />those to the Library Board so that not to forget this group exists. <br />Connie added that she wants to magnify all that is mentioned on the graphs she <br />had and provide updates, but she feels it should be more focused on services, <br />resources, and programs. She feels that the current SP needs to be reworked, <br />especially because there is a new City Manager and new Library Board <br />members. Connie is focused on her desire to better the library from the inside <br />out. She is not currently comfortable with an expansion because she is <br />concerned about doing the best she can with the space she has right now. <br />Abigail suggested going through each of the items on the SP, notating the growth <br />that has been made. Then, add those items to a list for observable progress and <br />then have an additional list for future goals. <br />Steve moved on and asked for the board to review Years 2 through 5 of the SP, to <br />determine what items would be capital allocations versus something that could <br />easily be accomplished without additional steps. <br />The board addressed Delivery Services for Shut-ins, which Connie said can be <br />accomplished on a small scale. Expanding the program would require separate <br />transportation. Steve then asked about the Mobile Library. Connie stated that <br />would be a part of Capital. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.