Laserfiche WebLink
to employment (as defined in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity <br />Act (29 U.S.C. 3102(24)), including women and people from underserved <br />communities as defined by Executive Order 14091; <br />iv. Using agreements intended to ensure uninterrupted delivery of services; using <br />agreements intended to ensure community benefits; or <br />V. Offering employees of a predecessor contractor rights of first refusal under a <br />new contract. <br />2. Recipients and subrecipients may use the practices listed in paragraph (1) if consistent with <br />the U.S. Constitution, applicable Federal statutes and regulations, the objectives and <br />purposes of the applicable Federal financial assistance program, and other requirements of <br />this part. <br />§ 200.319 Competition. <br />(a) All procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that <br />provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and <br />§ZQQJ40 '. <br />(b) To ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, <br />contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, or <br />invitations for bids must be excluded from competing on those procurements. <br />(c) Examples of situations that may restrict competition include, but are not limited to: <br />1. Placing unreasonable requirements on firms for them to qualify to do business; <br />2. Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding; <br />3. Noncompetitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies; <br />4. Noncompetitive contracts to consultants that are on retainer contracts; <br />S. Organizational conflicts of interest; <br />6. Specifying only a "brand name" product instead of allowing "an equal" product to be offered <br />and describing the performance or other relevant requirements of the procurement; and <br />7. Any arbitrary action in the procurement process. <br />(d) The city must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must <br />ensure that all solicitations: <br />1. Are made in accordance with § 200.319(b); <br />2. Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the property, <br />equipment, or service being procured. The description may include a statement of the <br />qualitative nature of the property, equipment, or service to be procured. When necessary, <br />the description must provide minimum essential characteristics and standards to which the <br />property, equipment, or service must conform. Detailed product specifications should be <br />avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to clearly and accurately <br />describe the technical requirements, a "brand name or equivalent" description of features <br />may be used to provide procurement requirements. The specific features of the named brand <br />must be clearly stated; and <br />3. Identify any additional requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors that <br />will be used in evaluating bids or proposals. <br />(e) The city must ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms, or products used in procurement <br />transactions are current and include enough qualified sources to ensure maximum open <br />competition. When establishing or amending prequalified lists, the city must consider objective <br />factors that evaluate price and cost to maximize competition. The city must not preclude potential <br />bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period. <br />(f) To the extent consistent with established practices and legal requirements applicable to the city, <br />this subpart does not prohibit recipients or subrecipients from developing written procedures for <br />procurement transactions that incorporate a scoring mechanism that rewards bidders that commit <br />to specific numbers and types of U.S. jobs, minimum compensation, benefits, on -the -job -training for <br />