<br />THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.
<br />
<br />I As Emission Restrictions Loom~ TXU Bets Big on Coal
<br />
<br />Continued Ft:tma Ant Page , plants hold ,considerable upside. TXU - big Is on the hOrlz.on. There are proposals given "allowances" -essentially, rights to
<br />reduce atmospheric pollution. "CarbQn dI. mines Its own coal In Texas and Is the,' to bulld about two dozen such plants In the pollute-which they could use themselves
<br />oxide Is a big game-changer." " nation '5 No. 10 coal Producer. Mr. Wilder U.S. In coming years, perhaps one-quaner or sell to others.
<br />TXU's Mr. Wilder declined to be Inter. projects that the new plants eventually of the planned new coal-tired plants. The allowances were Intended to soften
<br />Viewed. When he unveiled hJs plant. build- will add $1 billion or more to the compa. Duke Energy, which produces more the blow for companies that had made Invest.
<br />Ing plan In May, he dubbed It a "clean ny's annual profits. TXU Is attempting to than half Its power from coal, owns the mentdecls1onswlthoutknow!nglheYwould
<br />coal Initiative. " He said It was voluntary raise Sl1 bUllon to fund their construc- Wabash gasification plant and Is consll!- later face antipollution measures-to
<br />andwOuldreducebY2O%TXU'semlsslon tlon, and has approached banks, Invest- erlng building a larger one nearby, as "grandfather" them. Overt1rne,thenwnber
<br />of regulated pollutants Includlrig sulfur ment funds and industrial customers for well as a nuclear plant In South Carolina. of annual allowances handed out was re-
<br />dioxide, nitrogen oxides and mercury, loans and equity Investments. Mr. Wilder Although Ills also planning a new pulver. duced. That drove up their resale value and
<br />due to the Installation of more pollution- recently told analysts that TXU Is the IZed-COal-burnlng plant In North Caro- proVIded companies with an Incentive to In.
<br />control equipment on older plants. only company that can build so many IIna. the company says It favors federal stall poUution~ntrol equipment.
<br />Environmentalists say "clean coal" Is a plants in so short a period of time. greenhouse-gas regulation. Many believe the government eventu-
<br />misleading label. The reductions, they say, It is unclear whether the federal gov- One concern about gasification Is that ally will adopt a similar system to control
<br />aren't as voluntary as the company claims. ernment will move to limit carbon-mox- It can add $200 milllon or more to the cost carbon-moxide emissions. In late 2004,
<br />TXU Is required to reduce its emissions of Ide emissions. President Bush favors vol. of a SI billion coal power plant. But the TXU consultants adVised the company
<br />certain pollutants by 2015, and its plan ~tary reductions, as does TXU. But su~ Department of Energy reported that in. against trying to cut such emissions In
<br />moves up the timetable to 2010. "I think we port for mandatory reductions is growln stalllng carbon-i1ioxlde controls at pulver. anticipation of federal action. In a writ.
<br />should be applauded for It, " says MIke Mc- In Congress. Earlier this year, two sena. Ized-coal-burnlng plants, could' be so ten report, the consultants said that such
<br />Call, chief executJve of TXU Wholesale, the ors from New Mexico- Pete Domenlcl, a costly It would wipe out the cost dlfferen. "early actions" could reduce the allow-
<br />unit that runs TXU's generatJon business. Republican who heads the Energy and tlaI between the two technologies. aIlces that TXU receives In the future.
<br />Critics fault TXU for simultaneously Natural Resources committee, and Je Bechtel Corp. and General Electric Co. "The argument In support of grandfa.
<br />building so many coal.burnlng plants, Bingaman, the COmmittee's ranking are working together to design a gaslflca. therlng breaks down when you're talking
<br />each with a,50-year life expectancy. A mocrat-issued a white paper saying tlon power plant that would cost about as about plants being built to squeeze In
<br />more responsible approach, some say, the threat of global Warming Is real and much to build as the type of plant that TXU under the wire," says Bruce Biewald,
<br />would be to build only a few plants now, action must be taken. The paper said a intends to build. "We think the technology preSident of Synapse Energy Economics
<br />delaying the rest to take advantage of program for regulating carbon-i1ioxide is proven," says Bruce Morton, head ofthe Inc., a Cambridge, Mass., consulting
<br />ImproVIng carbon-i1ioxlde reduction tech- emissions was needed, and it solicited project for Bechtel, a global engineering finn that often works for state utlllty com-
<br />nology. TXU says bull ng a1111 plants at suggestions from the power Industry. firm based In San Francisco. missions. "It's not Intended for guys that
<br />lnce wil -reduce th st of each one. In its tten~re ns, TXU d It . During a recent meeting with ana. are adding to the problem because
<br />In s public arances, Mr. Wilder opposes egu, latlon be use would Iysts, Mr. Wilder said TXU examined gas- they've got their heads in the sand..
<br />m talns th ore power generation is "stunt conomjcr' gro h" a because Iflcation and concluded that the technol. Some companies think allowances
<br />enUy needed. At TXU's annUal mt:et. "the ouldJlot be y re nvtronmen. ogy wasn't sufficiently proven. "It's a should be doled out in a way that rewards
<br />:ng on May 19 he dI ayed a ChlW'f on tal benefits:" Th U.S. should take no gleam In someone's eye," he said. He companies for early, voluntary reduc.
<br />nfant mo ty, ng that ~trles action on mandatory carbon-dioxIde re- sald it would be financially risky for the tions. In 2002 the state of CalifOrnla cre-
<br />vlth hi per-c ta electri~ usage ,ductlons, TXU wrote, "unless all nations company to rely on the technology In Its ated an organization called the Callfor.
<br />lave lower ciden~e 0 arly death : adopt similar programs." current building program. nia Climate Action Registry to document
<br />han coun s with Ii electricity. He' TXU executives contend that the cur. Other TXU executives say they are and verify reductions of several green.
<br />rgued ' at Texas' el ctrlcity surplus is rent Congress is unlikely to act. "It's eas- interested In gasification down the road, house gases by companIes and public
<br />literally melting away" and that the ier to stop a blll than pass a blll," says but they want to own the technology. Mr. agencies. The group's goal is to secure
<br />tate needs TXU's new plants to buttress TXU's Mr. McCall. "It will only take 40 McCall, who runs the generation unit, credit for companies that take early ac-
<br />:s standard of liVing. senators to block carbon regulation." says the'firm is in talks with an unidenll. tion. Energy producers such as PG&E
<br />"We know what we do is a valuable There are ways to make electricity fled vendor about a possible gasification Corp., Mlrant Corp., BP PLC and the Los
<br />ling to society," he told shareholders. with coal that make It possible to sepa- design. "We're trying to do it In a proprl. Angeles Department of Water and Power
<br />r\nd pan of the debate of this new build rate out the carbon dioxide. A process etary way," he says. are participants.
<br />rogram that we have... with some of our called gasification is one way. Coal is For now, gasification plants are being Some states,including Washington, Or.
<br />lponents...is {that) you have to look at first converted Into a combustible gas, planned mostly In states that are trying to egon, California, and Vennont, are factor.
<br />Ie whole system of nefits and co to then that gas is burned to make electric. limit carbon-i1loxlde emissions, and In ing In the environmental aspects of pro-
<br />1C,~ety, e's no form of ele ricUy ity. Gasification otters two advantagt:.S those where utility-rate regulations make posed new plants when deciding what to
<br />da at c generat without over traditional coal Incineration. When It feasible for builders to recoup their authorize. Colorado and Wyoming, big
<br />socie arm.. the coal Is converted to a gas, many pol. costs. Such plants aren't going-to Texas, coal.productng states, are pushJng gasifi.
<br />Mr. WiI er'sstancefits slmageasan lutants are left behind and don't go up which deregulated Its electricity market cation projects. Seven Northeastern and
<br />)Qoclast who Is determined to transform the smokestack. And it is easier to cap- more extensively than many other states. Midwestern states agreed last year to cre-
<br />W from a stodgy utility company into a ture carbon dioxide, whJch can then be TXU'sdecislon to bulldpulverlzed-coal ate their own regional greenhouse-gas re-
<br />fhly profitable one. During hJs first two injected into the ground or ased In some plants-and to build them quickly-may 'ductlon program. "
<br />ars on the job, he sold noncore busi. other Industrial process. stem in pan from the way the federal gov.t, Texas gives no special conSideration-;,
<br />sses, nearly doubled utJllty rates and Two gasification power plants have ernment has Instituted pollution regula. to gasification plants. Late last year,
<br />en outsourced customer serVIce to take been operating near Tampa, Fla., and in tlons in the past. A 1990 federal program to Gov. Rick Perry signed an executive or-
<br />vantage to the 1999 deregulation of Tex. Wabash,lnd., for more than adecade, bullt reduce emissions of sultur dioxide, a con. der Instructlng state agencies to expedUe
<br />electricity Industry. with big federal subsidies. A new genera- tributor to acid rain, employed a "cap and . applications for new plants, especially
<br />"" TXU, lb, pion.", ''''''fi,,' "".'" ""'Wl'" p"'"".... "" lwl,,,, ""'- ",10m. ........ .,n"on.." . ,"",,=,., 1o><?I" m",' ",.. )
<br />
<br />M FRIDAY, JULY 21, 2006
<br />
<br />'~"-'r'-"-~.
<br />
<br />-r-~'-.-""-'--"-'-'-"
<br />
|