My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-099-RES CANVASSING THE RETURNS FOR NOV 4,2008 ELECTION FOR ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ON LIMIT AMOUNT OF TAXES ON RESIDENCE HOMESTEAD FOR DISABLED OR 65 YR OLDER
City-of-Paris
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
1889-2010
>
2008
>
2008-099-RES CANVASSING THE RETURNS FOR NOV 4,2008 ELECTION FOR ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ON LIMIT AMOUNT OF TAXES ON RESIDENCE HOMESTEAD FOR DISABLED OR 65 YR OLDER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2012 1:06:52 PM
Creation date
12/15/2008 10:34:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
2008-099 RES
Doc Type
Resolution
CITY CLERK - Date
11/17/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"Proposition No. 1 <br />❑ FOR That the total amount of ad valorem taxes imposed <br />by the City of Paris, Texas on the residence <br />homestead of a person who is disabled or is <br />sixty-five (65) years of age or older may not be <br />increased while it remains the residence homestead <br />❑ AGAINST of that person or that person's spouse who is <br />disabled or sixty-five (65) years of age or older, <br />except for any increases that may be allowed by <br />Section 11.261 Texas Tax Code, as amended from <br />time to time." <br />Section 3. That, in Council District 1, a total of 202 votes were cast regarding <br />Proposition 1 as follows: <br />District 1 <br />Earl Votin <br />Election Da <br />Total Votes <br />Percenta e <br />For Pro osition <br />68 <br />113 <br />181 <br />89.60% <br />A ainst Pro osition <br />10 <br />11 <br />21 <br />10.40% <br />TOTAL VOTES <br />78 <br />124 <br />202 <br />100.00% <br />Section 4. That, in Council District 2, a total of 76 votes were cast regarding <br />Proposition 1 as follows: <br />District 2 <br />l Votin <br />Ear <br />Election Da <br />Total Votes <br />Percenta e <br />For Pro osition <br />37 <br />30 <br />67 <br />88.16% <br />A ainst Pro osition <br />6 <br />3 <br />9 <br />11.84% <br />TOTAL VOTES <br />43 <br />33 <br />76 <br />100.00% <br />Section 5. That, in Council District 3, a total of 303 votes were cast regarding <br />Proposition 1 as follows: <br />District 3 <br />Earl Votin <br />Election Da <br />Total Votes <br />Percenta e <br />For Pro osition <br />149 <br />144 <br />293 <br />96.70% <br />A ainst Pro osition <br />0 <br />10 <br />10 <br />3.30% <br />TOTAL VOTES <br />149 <br />154 <br />303 <br />100.00% <br />Section 6. That, in Council District 4, a total of 256 votes were cast regarding <br />Proposition 1 as follows: <br />District 4 <br />Earl Votin <br />Election Da <br />Total Votes <br />Percenta e <br />For Pro osition <br />157 <br />84 <br />241 <br />94.14% <br />A ainst Pro osition <br />6 <br />9 <br />15 <br />5.86% <br />TOTAL VOTES <br />163 <br />93 <br />256 <br />100.00% <br />Section 7. That, in Council District 5, a total of 388 votes were cast regarding <br />Proposition 1 as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.