My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-052-RES APPROVE SYSTEM OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS FOR CITY MGR, CITY ATTY AND MUNI COURT JUDGE
City-of-Paris
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
1889-2010
>
2003
>
2003-052-RES APPROVE SYSTEM OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS FOR CITY MGR, CITY ATTY AND MUNI COURT JUDGE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2006 4:27:58 PM
Creation date
5/12/2003 1:28:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
2003
Doc Type
Resolution
CITY CLERK - Date
3/6/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Executive Being Evaluated: City Attorney <br />Evaluator: <br />Evaluation Date: <br /> <br />INSTRUCTIONS FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVES <br />BY CITY OF PARIS CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />Use the following guidelines to evaluate employee's performance for each performance <br />category listed on the Executive Performance Evaluation Sheet: <br /> <br />Exceeds Requirements: Performance is well above the normal standards forthis position. <br />Score with a numerical score of 1. <br /> <br />Satisfactorily Meets Requirements: Employee consistently demonstrates competent <br />performance in the specific job responsibility or criteria. Score with a numerical score of <br />~. <br /> <br />Requires Improvement: Performance periodically or regularly falls short of normal <br />standards. The evaluation indicates the evaluator's belief the employee can and will make <br />necessary improvements in this performance category. Score with a numerical score of <br />2. <br /> <br />Unsatisfactory: Performance is clearly inadequate. Employee has demonstrated an <br />inability or unwillingness to improve or to meet standard performance levels. Score with <br />a numerical score of 1. <br /> <br />Evaluation forms should be completed by each individual Council Person, following careful <br />individual consideration, and before the formal evaluation meeting, without collaboration <br />with other Council Persons in any way. <br /> <br />In the event an evaluation of 2 or less is aiven in anv specific performance category. the <br />evaluator must indicate by comments in the lines followina that criteria specific instances <br />iustifyina the low evaluation and suggested actions to improve the evaluation. <br /> <br />After the Executive Performance Evaluation Sheet is completed by each Council Person <br />the Performance Evaluation Overview must be completed to determine the composite <br />average in each performance category and the overall Average Composite Evaluation <br />Rating. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT B <br />Page I of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.