My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-May 2009 Financial Report
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2009
>
06 June
>
06-22-2009
>
08-May 2009 Financial Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2012 8:16:54 AM
Creation date
6/19/2009 5:57:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
08
AGENDA - Type
AGENDA
Description
May 2009 Financial Report
AGENDA - Date
6/22/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Paris <br />May 2009 Financial Report Comments <br />Net to Date Comparison of Revenues: <br />Property tax collections are 1.4% less than this point last year. I have spoken with the City's <br />delinquent tax attorney firm about contacting some of the larger delinquent accounts from the <br />current year. <br />2. Sales tax collections are 18.8% above last year's collections to date. Sales tax remittances to the <br />City from the State reflect sales from two months earlier. May collections reflect March sales. <br />3. Hotel occupancy taxes stand 27.3% over this same time last year. All hotel taxes are current <br />except for La Quinta which is delinquent for the first quarter of 2009. Both the City Attorney <br />and I have sent payment demand letters to them. <br />4. Franchise taxes are up 5.6% at this point. <br />5. Permit fees are up 213.4`Yo due to Paris High School's building permit fee of nearly $90,000. <br />6. Municipal Court fines are down 10.3% after eight months of activity. <br />7. Hanger lease payments and interest earnings are down compared to last year but this is due to <br />the somewhat irregular timing of such payments. At times renters will get behind a month or <br />two then catch up and sometimes they pay in advance knowing that they are going to be away <br />for a while. Over the course of the year this works itself out but it can at give a distorted view <br />of collections during the year. Likewise, interest revenue does not take place evenly throughout <br />the year. <br />8. EMS fees are 3.7% behind last year. <br />9. Miscellaneous collections are down for two primary reasons. First, last year's collections <br />included revenue collected from the sale of the abandoned Southern Disposal dumpsters. <br />Second, the construction deposits for the Holiday Inn Express and the Comfort Inn were initially <br />placed in miscellaneous revenue. The deposits were moved in July 2008 to an appropriate <br />holding account. <br />10. Total General Fund revenues are 2.8% above last year's receipts at this time. General Fund <br />revenues to date equal 79.1% of that budget while the City is only 66.66% through the budget <br />year. The difference between actual collections to date and budget collections to date is <br />because the City has collected 96.9% of its current taxes and 77.0% of its sales tax revenues. <br />11. Total General Fund expenditures are 5.1% more than last year, but within the current budget <br />amounts. General Fund expenditures are at 62.99% of budget while the City is 66.66% through <br />the budget year. <br />12. Water revenue is up 3.1% while sewer revenue is up 10.19'0. <br />13. In the Water & Sewer Fund, the receipts from the City of Irving represent reimbursements <br />under the MOU agreement. A total of $142,536.75 had been billed to Irving as of May 31st and <br />$142,536.75 has been collected. <br />14. Water & Sewer interest revenue is down but that is mostly a reflection of changing investment <br />maturity dates which affect the cash flow of interest payments. Changing interest rates also <br />have some impact on this line item. <br />15. The Water & Sewer Miscellaneous line item is down due to increased charge offs. I investigated <br />this matter and found that the billing clerk had failed to journalize some charge offs on a timely <br />basis resulting in an unusually large charge off when the transactions were finally journalized. <br />This matter has been discussed with her and should not happen again. The Office Manager will <br />monitor this situation. <br />a u 0 0 0 G:3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.