Laserfiche WebLink
PAT MAYSE WATER STUDY COMMITTEE <br />Draft of Potential Recommendations <br />June 25, 2009 <br />We recommend that the City Council: <br />Provide the Committee's work so far to the City of Irving, and allow them to develop <br />their own proposal based upon the information therein. Ask for more specificity in the <br />proposal regarding pricing, interest in interruptible flows, and relationship of the Hugo <br />contract to Paris; or <br />2. Terminate negotiations and do nothing further because there is not enough water <br />available. The City of Irving has suggested a minimum need of 20-25 MGD. Our studies <br />show that the City's available surplus is 12.8 MGD at present, decreasing to 72 MGD by <br />2060 based on current contracts; or <br />3. Recommend to the City Council that there is some surplus water for sale under certain <br />conditions. Those conditions are that for the years through 2020, a minimum of 12.8 <br />MGD; the years through 2040, 8.6 MGD; and years through 2060, 7.2 MGD. These <br />amounts would be available for sale to an outside entity on a firm basis. In addition an <br />interruptible supply can be offered to an outside entity that most likely will satisfy up to a <br />25 MGD requirement in most years, subject to first satisfying existing and future Lamar <br />county customer's needs and subject to discontinuing the delivery of water under such <br />contract when the lake level reaches elevation 448. The above recommendations are to <br />pursue a combined limited firm supply of water supplemented with an interruptible <br />supply. Elevation 448 was selected to protect current recreational access to the lake. <br />4. Offer an interruptible supply. Make water available to the outside entity only when the <br />lake is above elevation 448. <br />5. Initiate discussions with existing contract customers to determine if there are mutually <br />beneficial terms under which contracted amounts of water could be modified to reflect a <br />maximum annual volume as well as a peak day use, thus freeing up additional water. For <br />example if all contracts were modified to include a maximum annual volume of 125% of <br />the maximum current historical usage, this would free up 15.2 MGD. If added to the <br />uncommitted 8.6 million gallons in 2040, this would meet the City of Irving's <br />requirement. <br />6. Recapture the effluent from its wastewater treatment plant, and from Campbell Soup, by <br />constructing the Consultant's suggested diversion structure at Hicks Creek, and diverting <br />this water back to Lake Crook. Operate Lake Crook and Pat Mayse as a system with <br />water from Lake Crook being the first water sold to an outside entity. Use the existing <br />1 <br />'~M 000036 <br />