Laserfiche WebLink
mernbei• may do so b>> reguesting tlTat the iteiiibe removed fi-orn the consent agerida and considered <br />as a sepai•ate itefn.J <br />5. Discussion of and possible action regarding the.following structures coiisidered by code inspectors <br />to be in violation of'Ar•ticle III of Cliapter 7 of the Code of 'Ordinances of the Cit.), of Paris, Pai-is, <br />Tezas, entitled "Substandard aiid Danger-oiss Buildings and Structui-es, " to detei•mine tivlzether sucll <br />buildings or stf-uctures can be rehabilitated and desigrlated on the National Register of Histoi•ic <br />Places, as a recorded Texas Historic Landmar•k, or as histof•ic property as designated by the Citv <br />Gou»cil of 'the City of Paris: <br />A. 835 East Polk <br />B. 1818 West Hendei-son <br />C. 1365 Gf-aham <br />D. 127518" Street N. W. <br />E. 47 ]2l1' Street S.E. <br />Motion was made by Paul Denney, seconded by Douglas Cox to send all structures to the Building <br />and Standards Commission for demolition since they cannot be rehabilitated nor do they have <br />significant historical value. Motion carried 6-0. <br />6. Discussion of and possible action on recommendations fi-om the sub-committee on Historic <br />Preser-vation handouts foi• the pisblic. Matt Coyle presented a rough draft of the proposed handout. <br />Mr. Coyle further requested feedback from commissioners regarding information the handout <br />should or should not contain. Proposing a contact person placed on the brochure either with the <br />City of Paris or the commission, in case an individual had questions. The decision was made to <br />place the City of Paris as contact point, because the commission members change. Commission <br />approved the handout. <br />7. Discussioiz of and possible action on comparative language of the Design Guidelines on siglzage <br />vefsus the Sign Ordinance. Ben Vaughan addressed commission regarding the sign ordinance and <br />conflicts with Design Guidelines. Commissioners requested Mr. Vaughan come back at the next <br />meeting with changes that need to be made. <br />8. Request items for.future agendas. Sign ordinance vs. design guidelines. <br />5. Meeting adjourned at 12:47 p.m. <br />APPROVED TH1S 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2010. <br />A ' arrett, Chairman <br />2n <br />