My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Final Draft - Infiltration and Inflow Report June 1998
City-of-Paris
>
City Clerk
>
Annexation Ordinances
>
Final Draft - Infiltration and Inflow Report June 1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2012 2:24:33 PM
Creation date
9/14/2011 3:44:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EMS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
consideration soil conditions, existing underground utilities, high water tables or <br />excessive rock excavation. <br />The PIPE° computer model was used to rank each defect by priority number <br />(Appendix C). The priority number was determined by dividing the gallons of I/I <br />eliminated by the estimated rehabilitation cost. It should be emphasized that this <br />priority number is based on the amount of I/I observed or expected to enter <br />through the defect. Although structural defects may not currently contribute I/I, <br />and as such their priority number will be zero, they may impact the capacity of <br />existing lines and/or maintenance costs and are recommended to be included in an <br />overall rehabilitation program. <br />A prioritized ranking was determined for each individual manhole and line <br />segment based on the total I/I removed divided by the total rehabilitation cost for <br />that structure, assuming that all defects are repaired. Appendix B provides <br />prioritization of each manhole and line segment from the highest rank to the <br />lowest rank. Also, a prioritization of each manhole and line segment is included <br />based on the highest I/I removal to the lowest. <br />Presented for each identified problem is a method of rehabilitation and its <br />estimated cost (refer to the "Rehabilitation Methods and Costs", Table IV-2, page <br />IV-5). In addition, each defect in the priority number rankings (Appendix B and <br />C) can be identified in the field notes (Appendix E) by reference to the upstream <br />manhole number and sub-basin. <br />ADS Environmental Services, Inc. <br />IV-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.