Laserfiche WebLink
<br />There is no one factor that tilted the Steering Committee toward accepting a Settlement with TXU. Instead, <br />all of the following factors were influential: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Most residential customers remain on price to beat (PTB) rates. Cost of service rate reductions cannot <br />be shared with PTB customers until after January 1, 2007. Neither a litigated outcome nor a settlement <br />will benefit PTB customers before that date. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />The settlement delays rather than terminates a rate review. TXU must file a statewide case on or <br />before July 1, 2006. The settlement provides that the Company must cooperate with cities in the <br />interim period before the rate filing by funding a cities' consultant to evaluate affiliate transactions of <br />TXU. Additionally, the Company must provide up to $2 million of reimbursement of cities' future rate <br />case expenses. Without the settlement, the Steering Committee would have to make assessments to <br />raise a comparable amount of money. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Cities have been consistently treated unfairly in the cost allocation/rate design process associated with <br />the transition from regulated to competitive industry. This is especially true with regard to street <br />lighting and water pumping. The settlement guarantees that TXU will propose fixes to those tariff <br />problems when it files its rate case. That is particularly significant since rate design issues typically do <br />not receive adequate consideration in a rate case. The settlement provides specific relief to cities that <br />would be difficult to obtain in a rate case. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />TXU has agreed to provide the Steering Committee $8.5 million after approval of the Settlement <br />Agreement is obtained from cities. A payment of $8 million will be paid in 2006 and a third payment <br />in 2007 will be based on $8 million pro rata to the point of a final rate order from the Public Utility <br />Commission. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />CAPP has an extremely important legislative agenda and the potential benefit to residential citizens and <br />the cities where they reside from the four bills drafted by CAPP exceed benefits expected from a rate <br />case. It is better to postpone the rate case and concentrate current efforts on the Legislature. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adoption of the Resolution ratifying the Settlement Agreement. IF THE <br />SETTLEMENT IS APPROVED, THE CITY OF PARIS' ESTIMATED SHARE OF THE INITIAL <br />SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS IS $64,197.72. <br />