Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />(advanced) ¡according to the Water Conservation Guidebook published in 1993 by the <br />American Water Works Association. Below is the resulting calculation: <br />I <br />i <br />, <br /> <br />Potential re uction in water use (Most Likely scenario) = (188.7 X 2%) = 3.77 gpcd <br /> <br /> <br />cd <br /> <br />Average <br /> <br />ual per capita use for Paris water system = 188.7 gpcd <br /> <br />Potential r uction in water use (Advanced scenario) = (188.7 X 5%) = 9.44 gpcd <br /> <br />Technical <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />V. RedUC~g Dry-Year Irrigation Water Use: <br /> <br />The CEQ and TWDB have estimated that the potential savings for reducing dry- <br />year irrigat on is between 10.5% (Most likely) to 20% (Advanced) of the dry-year water <br />demand in cd. These savings result from xeriscaping (using drought-tolerant, low <br />water dem d landscapes) and decreasing watering of tradition landscaping by using <br />efficient w tering methods. Below is the resulting calculation for Paris: <br /> <br />Paris dry-y ar demand = 208.1 gpcd <br /> <br /> <br />Paris avera e demand = 188.7 gpcd <br /> <br />Dry-year i .gation use = dry-year demand - average demand = 208.1 - 188.7 = 19.4 gpcd <br /> <br /> <br />Potential r duction in water use (Most Likely scenario) = (19.4 X 10.5%) = 2.04 gpcd <br /> <br />Potential r duction in water use (Advanced scenario) = (19.4 X 20%) = 3.88 gpcd <br /> <br />cd <br /> <br /> <br />Calcu ation of the Total Technical Potential for reducing municipal per capita water <br />use is dete ined by adding the individual technical potential amounts in items I through <br />V above. e following table is a summary of these calculations for the City of Paris <br />water system: <br /> <br />8 <br />