13 - Council Minutes (4/5/01) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Regular City Council Meeting April 5, 2001 Page 9 and that at that time, the City Council may impose conditions relative to the standard of development with regard to specifics of the Planned Development. After further discussion, Ray Spencer came forward advising that the people in West Virginia , who are going to build this project, will furnish everything that is needed, but they want assurance that the church has the right planning before they start the project. Mr. Spencer further advised they will meet all city requirements that will be needed and that if the church can get the right zoning, these people will do the balance of the work. City Attorney Schenk read the following requirements for a Planned Developme nt District: “The City Council shall require a comprehensive site plan of the development. Such site plan shall be approved and filed as part of the ordinance prior to the issuance of any Building Permit in a Planned Development District. Such required plan and ordinance shall set forth the requirements for ingress and egress to the property, public or private streets or drives, with adequate right-of-way to conform to the Thoroughfare Plan of t he City of Paris, sidewalks, utilities, drainage, parking space, height of building, maximum lot coverage, yards and open spaces, screening walls or fences and other development and protection requirements considered necessary to create reasonable transition to and protection of the adjacent property.” ORDINANCE NO. 2001-017 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1710 OF THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS, AND CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES ESTABLISHED BY THE ZONING MAP OF SA ID CITY; ESTABLISHING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (B) DISTRICT (C) ON LOT 6, CITY BLOCK 33 1 , ON PROPERTY BELONGING TO RAY SPENCER, SO AS TO INCLUDE THEREIN TERRITORY FORMERLY DES IGNATED AS A ONE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT NO. 2 (SF- 2); DESIGNATING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (B) DISTRICT SO ESTABLISHED; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $2,000.00; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PART S OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF MAY 1, 2001, WAS PRESENTED.