Laserfiche WebLink
(f) That after due publication of notice9 as required by law, on the 7th day <br />of November9 A. D., 1966, at 7:00 otclock P.M., said hearing was opened <br />and held in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time and <br />place an opportunity was given to all of the above mentioned parties and <br />agents and attorneys to be heard or offer evidence as to al,l. matters in <br />accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time the following <br />appeared and testified as follows: <br />Richard Babb, the City Engineer of the City of Paris, briefly described the <br />improvements proposed to be constructed and explained the method of <br />apportionment of the costs of such improvements between the City and the <br />abutting property and the owners thereof. <br />The City Attorney then pointed out that notice of the hearing had been pub- <br />Iished in the Paris News at the time and in the manner required by law, <br />and that such contained proposed rates to be assessed against the abutting <br />property and its owners, and that a copy of the notice had been mailed to <br />the abutting property owners. <br />The City Manager, H. C. Kennemer, testified and advised the Council of the <br />respective values of the improvements and the degree to which they en-. <br />hanced the value of the respective abLtting property owners, and that, in <br />his opinion, the abutting properties, and each of them, would, if said <br />street were improved, in accordance with the contract and plans and speci- <br />fications, be enhanced in value in an amount greater than the proposed <br />assessments against such properties. <br />(g) That at said hearing the following property owners were present and <br />offered objections or testimony as to said improvements,, contractsp or <br />assessments therefor, or as to proceedings with reference thereto. <br />(1) None <br />