1805 ORD CLOSING HEARING GIVEN TO REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING ON CERTAIN STREET IN COP

Home Browse Search

(2) That the City Council has heard all persons who appeared and desired to testify, object or protest as to the special benefits in enhanced value to accrue to said abutting property and the real and true owners thereof as compared with the portion of the cost of constructing said improvements proposed to be assessed against said abutting property, and has heard all parties appearing and offering testimony, together with a11, objections and protests relative to such matters and relative to any errors, invalidities, or irregu- larities in any of the proceedings and contract for said improve- ments, and has given a full and fair hearing to all parties making or desiring to make any such protest or objection or to offer testi- mony, and has fully examined and considered all of said evidence, matterss testimony, and objections offered. (h) That the City Council did consider and correct all errorsa invalidi- ties, or deficiencies call.ed to its attention and did find that al], proceedings and contracts were proper and in accordance with the laws under which same are being had and with the directives of said City Council in reference to such improvementsy and that the same are, in all respects, valid and regular, as corrected. The Mayor announced that the hearing was closedp and directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance incorporating the findings of the City Council when made. (i) That based on the evidence, matters, objections, and testimony con- sidered at such hearing, the City Council has determined that the proper- ties, and each and every parcelcf such property abutting upon the street and units as hereinafter set out will be enhanced in value and specially benefited by the construction of such improvements in anan-cxznt in excess of the amount of such improvements proposed to be, and as hereinafter assessed against each of said parcels of property abutting upon said street and the real and true owners thereof. (j) That the City Council is of the opinion and finds that the Front Foot Plan or Rule would result in justice and equity between all parcels of pro- perty within the same unit; and the City Council has determined to appor- tion and assess the costs on the Front Foot Plan or Rule, except in the following situations and adjustments in assessments against corner proper- ties, so as to produce a substantial equality of benefits received and burdens imposed. None And the City Council has further found upon the evidence considered